englishcomplaint form.rev.042313 adalberto cervantes rodriguez

Office for Civil Rights Discrimination Complaint Form

1. Enter information about yourself.

First Name: _Adalberto______ Last Name _Cervantes Rodriguez_______________

Address: _____5414 Lancashire

Drive_____________________________________________________________

City: ____San Antonio________ State:_______TX_________ Zip Code: __78230__________

Phone Number—Day: ____+1210807336______________ Evening: ________________________

Best Time to Call You: __From 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM_____________________

Your E-mail Address:

[email protected]__________________________________________

2. Who else can we call if we cannot reach you?

Contact's Name: _______________NA___________________ Relationship to you: ____NA_______

Contact’s Daytime Phone Number: _____________________NA___________________________

3. Who was discriminated against? Check all that apply.

X Yourself Someone else

If someone other than yourself, please include:

Injured Person's Name: _____________________________________________________

Phone Number—Day: _______________________ Evening: ________________________

Relationship to You: (e.g., son or daughter) __________________________________________

Injured Person's Address, if different than your address: _______________________________

City: ________________________ State:___________________ Zip Code: ______

If the person discriminated against is age 18 or older, we will need that person's signature before we can proceed with this

complaint. If the person is a minor, and you do not have legal authority to file a complaint on the student's behalf, the

signature of the child's parent or legal guardian is required.

4. What institution discriminated? (OCR's laws cover educational institutions such as school districts, colleges and universities, public libraries and state vocational rehabilitation agencies)

Institution Name: _____Oracle and Pemex/ IMP________________________________

Address: _______________well known________________________________________________

City: ______________________________State:__________________ Zip Code: ________

– Discrimination Complaint Form and Attachments

School or department involved: ___IPN-UPIICSA________________________________________

Have you tried to resolve the complaint through the institution's grievance process, due process

hearing, or with another agency?

XX Yes No

If yes, provide the following information:

Agency Name: ____________Several_______________________________ Date Filed:___________

Current status of the complaint:

___No advance______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________ (If more space is needed , please use a separate sheet of paper.)

5. Describe the discrimination OCR enforces regulations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin; sex; disability; and/or age.

On what basis were you discriminated against? (You may select more than one)

race or color xxx xx national origin disability sex age

retaliation because you filed a complaint or asserted your rights

In the space provided below please describe each discriminatory action separately. For each action,

you need to provide the following information:

· date(s) the discriminatory action(s) occurred;

· name(s) of individual(s) who discriminated;

· what happened;

· witnesses, (if any);

· why you believe the discrimination was because of [race, gender, disability, or whatever basis

you indicated above] or why you believe the action was retaliatory.

_________It is given in the body of the email (attachment)__________________________

How did Oracle steal my ideas?

From: Adalberto Cervantes Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:54 AM To: [email protected] ; [email protected]

Subject: Re: How did Oracle steal my ideas? I studied at IPN

From: Adalberto Cervantes Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 4:09 AM

To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

Subject: Fw: How did Oracle steal my ideas? I studied at IPN


mailto:[email protected]












To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]




[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]


From: Adalberto Cervantes Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 3:38 AM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Natasha DeKroon, CISA, ACDA ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Reiner Kraakman


From: Adalberto Cervantes Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 3:16 AM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;


[email protected] ; Reiner Kraakman ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]


From: Adalberto Cervantes Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 3:15 AM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Brian Pentland ;

Reiner Kraakman ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Oscar [BMX-

BNAMEX] Rodriguez Villanueva ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Alejandro Cervantes ; ADALBERTO CERVANTES y FERNANDEZ ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; Vero Collins ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

















































































































































































To: LinkedIn Customer Support ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;



[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;


[email protected]

Subject: How did Oracle steal my ideas? I studied at IPN

From: Adalberto Cervantes Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 8:33 AM


[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Reiner Kraakman ; [email protected] ;


[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Subject: Fw: Are really the Mexican and United States governments working mutually against illegal businesses? I studied

at the IPN

Subject: Fw: Are really the Mexican and United States governments working mutually against illegal businesses? I studied at the IPN Are really the Mexican and United States governments working mutually against illegal businesses?

What we can see it is that criminals are getting into the political power receiving huge amounts of bribes, illegal

management businesses is more relevant than the economy and people of both countries, it seems that basic economic

principles are forgotten in the underground of the legal businesses.

Using media, tax money, killing civilians, slavery children among others is only the peak of the iceberg. Bribes have

increased given by the BRIC countries as well as supporting all kind of illegalities to increase the wealthiest of the Forbes

richest men in the world using Free Trade Agreements when there is no scientific evidence that the accounting principles

are even the same in all these countries wishing to increase their commerce, so financial, economic, engineering,

accounting frauds are common in this global economy affecting millions of people in extreme poverty while the politicians

are getting more and more money on their side all the time, they are using high school consultant coming from Indian origin

(Muslim) through IT monopolies and Chinese cyber-attacks in the Cool War.

It is important that the education must be a priority for Latinos in general especially in USA as well as the priority of

interest not allowing any more criminals to receive any kind of USA visa protecting our border. The Free Trade

Agreements should be evaluated on bases of the comparison of prices for the same product, service or ideas among the

participant countries; it should not be fair to receive them several times more expensive that the country of origin. Stop

helping unplanned immigrates with our tax money, in other case the immigrates´ country has to invest at the same level in

our economy.

Common people has to understand the economic mistakes done are planned, protecting extremist groups like the Opus Dei,

the white supremacists (slavery-Nazis using Cold War techniques in LATAM), and other mafias around the world. They are

creating a fantasy world that gives magical solutions using these criminal groups in business and government; nobody is

impressible to solve scientifically all this situation and they are killed using the force of the Agencies, China and India with

electronic weapons worldwide. Only the mafia people are the one defining our future while the BRIC countries are taken

advantage, the dark side and the use of the force are better than scientific and technological knowledge for these unethical





























































politicians.

It is important to legalize what it has to be legalized to be more focus in the real economy, and real problems, instead of

being working in the unknown illegal businesses and Walt Disney´s fantasies. It is a waste of government time to continue

in this unproductive path, and damaging people using the New Order technology (evil Chinese technology) at the same

time.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/MAP.OPM/?fref=ts https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=356522697781800&set=a.306393222794748.54543.306389076128496&type=1&theater Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=13169407&trk=tab_pro http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez USA address: San Antonio, TX. US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316 Teléfono en el DF. 84212986 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damager From: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:31 PM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; interpol-


[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

Subject: Fw: Possible human traffic activities between DIF Mexico and CPS San Antonio and relation with the catholic Pope.

Possible human traffic activities between DIF Mexico and CPS San Antonio, and relation with the catholic Pope.

The pope start visiting and made business with them, The catholic church has to recuperate the money of the sues

against them in ...USA. He knew about the killing of millions of Chineses of a religious group, Chineses offered

him the life of the Chinese children of this religious group (Genocide massacre in China). Good opportunity, he

contacted Hillary Clinton, and Calderon, opus dei members, business done in high level.

It seems that Joaquin Castro works for the China Imperium including India and their satellites countries like

Mexico. Human Traffic between DIF Mexico to CPS San Antonio of Mexican, children from India and Chinese

children. Allowing investment of American and Mexican mafias in San Antonio. Shame on Joaquin Castro. The

true will come soon.

Calderon and his wife controlled DIF Mexico, the only entity similar to Child Protective Services in USA and

with legal authority to USCIS (Immigration), Calderon and his wife were the only taking decision of adoption in

Mexico through the States, instead of help many children to legalize their situation in the States, they used them

as a personal business, each child more than 15,000.00 USD, they were coming from China, India and also

Mexican children to be given in adoption in the States, no body (Mexican, Mexican American families), even the

personnel in DIF Mexico knows that DIF is the only legal entity recognized by USCIS to do that. Only my

estimates annually with Chinese children are more 200 million dollars, but it was only a personal business of

Calderon and Fox that no Mexican or Mexican American was beneficiated. Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA

https://www.facebook.com/groups/MAP.OPM/?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=356522697781800&set=a.306393222794748.54543.306389076128496&type=1&theater


























http://www.linkedin.com/pub/adalberto-cervantes-rodriguez/4/4b1/227 http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez USA address: San Antonio, TX. US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316 Teléfono en el DF. 84212986 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage http://revoluciontrespuntocero.com/tras-difusion-de-video-redes-sociales-reportan-decenas-de-muertos-en-michoacan-video/ Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=13169407&trk=tab_pro http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez USA address: San Antonio, TX. US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316 Teléfono en el DF. 84212986 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage From: Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 3:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Fw: This is called the New Order. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=470812106320422&set=vb.138602119541424&type=2&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151547746248570&set=o.165801456790697&type=1&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=248549125288355&set=a.154531638023438.38268.154530528023549&type=1&theater Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=13169407&trk=tab_pro http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez USA address: San Antonio, TX. US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316 Teléfono en el DF. 84212986 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no

http://revoluciontrespuntocero.com/tras-difusion-de-video-redes-sociales-reportan-decenas-de-muertos-en-michoacan-video/

http://revoluciontrespuntocero.com/tras-difusion-de-video-redes-sociales-reportan-decenas-de-muertos-en-michoacan-video/



https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=470812106320422&set=vb.138602119541424&type=2&theater

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151547746248570&set=o.165801456790697&type=1&theater




liability for any damage From: Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:38 PM To: ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;



[email protected] Subject: It takes time but I have it. I have this stuff in my body https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=558127727561503&set=a.397732896934321.99189.118221548218792&type=1&theater How to protect yourself against implanted devices for IT connectivity? You have to know like other chip or electronic

device, they are not working properly if you use magnetism, water or other solutions like cream, or electricity, this external

factor among others the materials use to have like cold, hot, so weather conditions like atmospheric pression , definitely

will impact the well function of the devices implanted in a body.

Buy massage electronic devices, magnetos, use the power connector of the computer, mobile phone with water, they will

work among others. Certain part of your body will be hot because of the attack, use the magnetos, they will be warm also.

Use a hat with magnetic structure; they use the magnetic material where they are selling material

Body knows that you have something that it is not part of your body, you will feel like an insect bite without a trace, but

suddenly the touch of your hand and a pump will find something, here they are, use a needled disinfected try to extract

them. You have to do it because in spite it can protect someone also it can produce sicknesses, heart attacks, trucks, a lot of

pain, swelling of the legs , headaches, difficulty to pup, among others.

You have to do it yourself, because if someone attacks, they have the mechanism even to get in the hospital you are, to have

you harmed, so do not do anything risky, especially if you alone, ask someone be with you all the time, do not ask for

ambulance, go you self to the ER. In the first place, you were sedated, and a Chinese inserted the methodic device like

acupuncture technique, of course there is another way to send you to a mental hospital, thinking that nobody believes you.

Do not be panic, if you know to drive, have money, and start traveling long distances.

They need at least two days to make it work the implanted devices in your body, the first one is to implant them in your

body, the second one is calibrate the devices in your body, it can identify your sicknesses in all over your body, everything.

Be out of the spectrum of the internet signals, they are using against you, identify if only they are using blackberries, mobile

phones, personal computers near your job, or everywhere you go, including your house. It is that the case, it is good because

it means that first they have to find you, it is easy for them because you might have chips in both ear, do not be panic. The

harmful way of attacking you, it is using a satellite, they have a lot of power and connectivity everywhere, they can see you

in third dimension like to have a doctor near you but it is really a butcher.

Try to find more about the devices and how to destroy them, they are like nails, it seems they can see through your body in

detail, they are like little transparent plastic material, and they are others like a hair, but they can be burn, do it.

Do not allow surgeries over you in Sparrow Hospital using Androit and Google technology, they will know where are you

all the time, and they will attack your central system with a complex microsurgery, starting in your ear to your brain. The

implanted devices might have connectivity even with sophisticated equipment use at the Hospital.

Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA




































http://www.linkedin.com/pub/adalberto-cervantes-rodriguez/4/4b1/227

http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez

USA address: San Antonio, TX.

US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316

Teléfono en el DF. 84212986

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the

named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately

if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should

check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any

damage

From: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:31 PM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

[email protected] ; [email protected] Subject: Re: Calderon and Fox used the international legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico agains me Ya se hizo en el Estado de México, aunque soy del DF Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA http://www.linkedin.com/pub/adalberto-cervantes-rodriguez/4/4b1/227 http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez USA address: San Antonio, TX. US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316 Teléfono en el DF. 84212986 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage From: Visitaduria Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:37 AM To: Adalberto Cervantes-Rodríguez Subject: RE: Calderon and Fox used the international legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico agains me GRACIAS POR SU COMENTARIO, PUEDE INICIAR SU QUERELLA POR EL DELITO DE AMENAZAS, POR

MEDIO DEL M.P. VIRTUAL A LA PAGINA WWW,PGJDF.GOB.MX De: Adalberto Cervantes-Rodríguez [mailto:[email protected]]

Enviado el: Domingo, 30 de Diciembre de 2012 12:22 p.m. Para: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Procurador General de

Justicia del Distrito Federal; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; patricia zenil;

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Visitaduria; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Asunto: Calderon and Fox used the international legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico agains me











Calderon and Fox used the international legal and illegal security network in USA and

Mexico against me, after a comment on line in Excelsior and Universal about the

issue of two plagiarisms of Fox in Mexico at Universidad Iberoamericana for hic

Bachelor´s degree and also in his thesis presented at an American University

for his PhD. It was long time ago but since then he has been using the

international legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico against me

for almost three years, as a personal issue. Also I used to work in Hildebrando,

Calderon´s family business and both of them decided to use this international

legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico against me because of my comments on line about the

plagiarism of Fox using government documents as Theses.

Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA



USA address: San Antonio, TX.

US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316

Teléfono en el DF. 84212986

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the

named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately

if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should

check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any

damage

How did Oracle steal my ideas? I love technology my Bachelor?s, Master's and Doctoral?s theses were about ERP, accounting, modules, productivity, costing, economy systems. Since then, I continue working and writing about it. I am really strong technically in these areas. I hope that I have the money, resource, and I have lived in the States when I finished my master?s degree I will create an American SAP, but at the IMP (Mexican Petroleum Institute) decided to invest in Oracle and stole my idea to be develop by Oracle after my thesis, I was working in the scientific and applied research areas at IMP when this happened. My wife told that we can sue the Mexican Petroleum Institute to use my thesis and send my idea to Oracle in the biggest investment to start Oracle as a business, never seen by a Mexican Government Institute. Of course my IMP bosses did not tell me about that and they did not invite me, and I found like 6 years ago, such a coincidence...today I am a US citizen. Its better for development professional. But your ex boss hasnt ethic. Congratulations. Sï¿œ solamente me felicitaban por mi tesis de maestrï¿œa en UPIICSA, cuando los veï¿œa en la calle, pero no me dijeron que la usaron como base para convencer gente de PEMEX y despuï¿œs financiar a Oracle para iniciarlo en el negocio de base de datos y ERP. que gachos, pero ï¿œno existe la posibilidad de demandarlos? Pero ï¿œï¿œha sido una investigaciï¿œn financiada por ellos??, en ese caso no podrï¿œan usarla para negocios privados. Si estoy en eso, por eso lo estoy haciendo pï¿œblico, tengo que buscar alternativas, yo no entendï¿œa porquï¿œ me felicitaban, decï¿œan que mi tesis habï¿œa causado impacto...pero nada mï¿œs...me entero hace 6 o 7 aï¿œos por internet de cï¿œmo empezï¿œ Oracle en el negocio. habï¿œa varios becados del IMP en Stanford University, inclusive a mï¿œ tambiï¿œn me beco CONACYT, pero no pude irme en ese tiempo.


Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez, PhD, MS, MBA http://www.linkedin.com/pub/adalberto-cervantes-rodriguez/4/4b1/227 http://www.facebook.com/#!/adalberto.cervantes.rodriguez USA address: San Antonio, TX. US Mobile phone. +210-807-3316 Telï¿œfono en el DF. 84212986 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for [recipient name]. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________ (If more space is needed, use a separate sheet of paper.)




Do you have written information that you think will help us understand your complaint?

XXX Yes No

You will be contacted with instructions for submitting this information (please do not send original

documents).

6. Your complaint must be filed within 180 days of the discriminatory action.

The laws that we enforce require that complaints be filed with our office within 180 days of the alleged discriminatory

event. If any of the alleged discriminatory actions took place more than 180 days before the postmark or receipt date

of this complaint, you may request a waiver of the 180-day limit.

Provide the date that the last act of discrimination occurred: _It is reported already to Department of State

and DHS_______________________

Are you requesting a waiver of the 180-day filing time limit for discrimination that occurred more

than 180 days before the filing of this complaint?

Yes XXX No

Provide your reason for not filing complaint before 180 days below:

___________I did not know the details_______________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________ (If more space is needed, use a separate sheet of paper.)

7. What would you like the institution to do as a result of your complaint? What remedy are you

seeking?

______Do something legally, Pemex is located in Texas and Mexico City, IMP at Mexico City and

Oracle at California, USA_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________


_______________________________________________________________________________ (If more space is needed, use a separate sheet of paper.)


8. Please read the Consent Form contained at the end of this document and information about OCR's

Complaint Processing Procedures that are a part of this package. Before we can complete initial

processing of your complaint, you must sign your complaint and the Consent Form authorizing us to

proceed. Sign the form below, date, and mail it to:

U.S. Department of Education

Office for Civil Rights

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1620

Dallas, Texas 75202

214-661-9600; 214-661-9587-FAX; e-mail: [email protected]

Signed electronically by Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez 5/7/2003

(Signature) (Date)



United States Department of Education

Office for Civil Rights

CONSENT FORM- FOR USE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION

Complainant's Name (print or type): ___Adalberto Cervantes-Rodriguez__ PHONE:__+12108073316________

Institution Against Which Complaint Filed: ______Oracle and PEMEX/IMP_____________________________

Please sign and date section A or section B and return to the above address:

I have read the section, "Investigatory Uses of Personal Information" in the OCR document "Information about OCR's

Complaint Resolution Procedures," which explains OCR's use of personal information. I understand that the Privacy Act of

1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, govern the use of personal information

submitted to all Federal agencies and their individual components, including OCR. I will cooperate with OCR's

investigation and complaint resolution activities undertaken on my behalf. I understand that my failure to cooperate with

OCR’s investigation may result in the closure of my complaint.

A. I give OCR my consent to reveal my identity (and/or that of my minor child/ward on whose behalf the complaint is

filed) to the institution alleged to have discriminated, as well as other persons and entities outside if OCR, in the

course of its investigation or for enforcement activities, finds it necessary to do so.

_Signed electronically by Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez _____5/7/2013______________

Signature Date

OR

B. I do not give OCR my consent to reveal my identity (and/or that of my minor child/ward on whose behalf the

complaint is filed). I understand that OCR may have to close this complaint if OCR is unable to proceed with an

investigation without releasing my identity (and/or that of my minor child/ward on whose behalf the complaint is filed).

____________________________ ______________________

Signature Date

Alternatively, if you are not filing this complaint on your own behalf or on behalf of your own minor child/ ward, you

are responsible for obtaining written consent from the person on whose behalf the complaint is filed or, if he or she is

a minor, that person’s parent/ guardian.


I have read this document, and I agree with the person who filed this complaint. I wish you to proceed with OCR's

investigation and resolution process. I give my consent for OCR to reveal my identity to other persons to the extent

necessary for the purpose of resolution or investigation of this complaint.

Name (print or type): __________________________________________________

_____________________________ _______________________

Signature Date

January 2010

OCR COMPLAINT PROCESSING PROCEDURES

OCR COMPLAINT PROCESSING PROCEDURES

LAWS ENFORCED BY OCR

OCR enforces the following laws:

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or

national origin;

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability;

Age Discrimination Act of 1975, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age;

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of

disability;

Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act, part of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which prohibits

denial of access to or other discrimination against the Boy Scouts or other Title 36 U.S.C. youth groups in

public elementary schools, public secondary schools, local education agencies, and state education

agencies that have a designated open forum or limited public forum.

EVALUATION OF THE COMPLAINT

OCR evaluates each complaint that it receives in order to determine whether it can investigate the complaint.

OCR makes this determination with respect to each allegation in the complaint. For example, OCR must

determine whether OCR has legal authority to investigate the complaint; that is, whether the complaint alleges a

violation of one or more of the laws OCR enforces. OCR must also determine whether the complaint is filed on

time. Generally, a complaint must be filed with OCR within 180 calendar days of the last act that the

complainant believes was discriminatory.1 If the complaint is not filed on time, the complainant should provide

the reason for the delay and request a waiver of this filing requirement. OCR will decide whether to grant the

waiver. In addition, OCR will determine whether the complaint contains enough information about the alleged

discrimination to proceed to investigation. If OCR needs more information in order to clarify the complaint, it

1 Complaints that allege discrimination based on age are timely if filed with OCR within 180 calendar days of the date the complainant

first knew about the alleged discrimination.


will contact the complainant; the complainant has 20 calendar days within which to respond to OCR’s request for

information.

OCR will dismiss a complaint if OCR determines that:

OCR does not have legal authority to investigate the complaint;

The complaint fails to state a violation of one of the laws OCR enforces;

The complaint was not filed timely and that a waiver will not be granted;

The complaint is unclear or incomplete and the complainant does not provide the information that

OCR requests within 20 calendar days of OCR’s request;

The allegations raised by the complaint have been resolved;

The complaint has been investigated by another Federal, state, or local civil rights agency or

through a recipient’s internal grievance procedures, including due process proceedings, and the

resolution meets OCR regulatory standards or, if still pending, OCR anticipates that there will be a

comparable resolution process under comparable legal standards;

The same allegations have been filed by the complainant against the same recipient in state or

Federal court;

The allegations are foreclosed by previous decisions of the Federal courts, the U.S. Secretary of

Education, the U.S. Department of Education’s Civil Rights Reviewing Authority, or OCR policy

determinations.

OPENING THE COMPLAINT FOR INVESTIGATION

If OCR determines that it will investigate the complaint, it will issue letters of notification to the complainant and

the recipient. Opening a complaint for investigation in no way implies that OCR has made a determination with

regard to the merits of the complaint. During the investigation, OCR is a neutral fact-finder. OCR will collect

and analyze relevant evidence from the complainant, the recipient, and other sources as appropriate. OCR will

ensure that investigations are legally sufficient and are dispositive of the allegations raised in the complaint.

INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPLAINT

OCR may use a variety of fact-finding techniques in its investigation of a complaint. These techniques may

include reviewing documentary evidence submitted by both parties, conducting interviews with the complainant,

recipient’s personnel, and other witnesses, and/or site visits. At the conclusion of its investigation, OCR will

determine with regard to each allegation that:

There is insufficient evidence to support a conclusion that the recipient failed to comply with the law, or

A preponderance of the evidence supports a conclusion that the recipient failed to comply with the law.

OCR’s determination will be explained in a letter of findings sent to the complainant and recipient. Letters of

findings issued by OCR address individual OCR cases. Letters of findings contain fact-specific investigative

findings and dispositions of individual cases. Letters of findings are not formal statements of OCR policy and

they should not be relied upon, cited, or construed as such. OCR’s formal policy statements are approved by a

duly authorized OCR official and made available to the public.

RESOLUTION OF THE COMPLAINT AFTER A DETERMINATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE

If OCR determines that a recipient failed to comply with one of the civil rights laws that OCR enforces, OCR will

contact the recipient and will attempt to secure the recipient’s willingness to negotiate a voluntary resolution

agreement. If the recipient agrees to resolve the complaint, the recipient will negotiate and sign a written

resolution agreement that describes the specific remedial actions that the recipient will undertake to address the

area(s) of noncompliance identified by OCR. The terms of the resolution agreement, if fully performed, will


remedy the identified violation(s) in compliance with applicable civil rights laws. OCR will monitor the

recipient’s implementation of the terms of the resolution agreement to verify that the remedial actions agreed to

by the recipient have been implemented consistent with the terms of the agreement and that the area(s) of

noncompliance identified were resolved consistent with applicable civil rights laws.

If the recipient refuses to negotiate a voluntary resolution agreement or does not immediately indicate its

willingness to negotiate, OCR will inform the recipient that it has 30 days to indicate its willingness to engage in

negotiations to voluntarily resolve identified areas of noncompliance, or OCR will issue a Letter of Finding to the

parties providing a factual and legal basis for a finding noncompliance.

If, after the issuance of the Letter of Finding of noncompliance, the recipient continues to refuse to negotiate a

resolution agreement with OCR, OCR will issue a Letter of Impending Enforcement Action and will again

attempt to obtain voluntary compliance. If the recipient remains unwilling to negotiate an agreement, OCR will

either initiate administrative enforcement proceedings to suspend, terminate, or refuse to grant or continue

Federal financial assistance to the recipient, or will refer the case to the Department of Justice. OCR may also

move immediately to defer any new or additional Federal financial assistance to the institution.

RESOLUTION OF THE COMPLAINT PRIOR TO THE CONCLUSION OF THE INVESTIGATION

Early Complaint Resolution (ECR):

Early Complaint Resolution allows the parties (the complainant and the institution which is the subject of the

complaint) an opportunity to resolve the complaint allegations quickly; generally, soon after the complaint has

been opened for investigation. If both parties are willing to try this approach, and if OCR determines that Early

Complaint Resolution is appropriate, OCR will facilitate settlement discussions between the parties and work

with the parties to help them understand the legal standards and possible remedies. To the extent possible, staff

assigned by OCR to facilitate the Early Complaint Resolution process will not be the staff assigned to the

investigation of the complaint.

OCR does not approve, sign or endorse any agreement reached between the parties as a result of Early Complaint

Resolution, and OCR does not monitor the agreement. However, if the recipient institution does not comply with

the terms of the agreement, the complainant may file another complaint with OCR within 180 days of the date of

the original discrimination or within 60 days of the date the complainant learns of the failure to comply with the

agreement, whichever date is later.

Resolution of the Complaint Prior To the Conclusion of an Investigation

A complaint may also be resolved before the conclusion of an investigation, if the recipient expresses an interest

in resolving the complaint. If OCR determines that resolution of the complaint before the conclusion of an

investigation is appropriate, OCR will attempt to negotiate an agreement with the recipient. OCR will notify the

complainant of the recipient’s request and will keep the complainant informed throughout all stages of the

resolution process. The provisions of the resolution agreement that is reached must be aligned with the complaint

allegations and the information obtained during the investigation, and must be consistent with applicable

regulations. A resolution agreement reached before the conclusion of an investigation will be monitored by OCR.

APPEAL OF OCR’S DETERMINATIONS

OCR is committed to a high quality resolution of every case. OCR affords an opportunity to the complainant to

submit an appeal of OCR's dismissal or administrative closure of a complaint or letter finding insufficient

evidence of a violation. The appeal process provides an opportunity for complainants to bring information to

OCR’s attention that would change OCR’s decision. The appeal process will not be a de novo review of OCR’s

decision.


If the complainant disagrees with OCR’s decision, he or she may send a written appeal to the Director of the

Enforcement Office (Office Director) that issued the determination. If the complainant has documentation to

support the appeal, the documentation must be submitted with the complainant’s appeal. In an appeal, the

complainant must explain why he or she believes the factual information was incomplete, the analysis of the facts

was incorrect, and/or the appropriate legal standard was not applied, and how this would change OCR’s

determination in the case. Failure to do so may result in the denial of the appeal.

In order to be timely, an appeal (including any supporting documentation) must be submitted within 60 days of

the date of the determination letter. The Office Director may exercise discretion in granting a waiver of the 60-

day timeframe where:

1. the complainant was unable to submit the appeal within the 60-day timeframe because of illness or

other incapacitating circumstances and the appeal was filed within 30 days after the period of illness

or incapacitation ended; or

2. unique circumstances generated by agency action have adversely affected the complainant.

A written response to an appeal will be issued as promptly as possible. The decision of the Office Director

constitutes the agency’s final decision. The decision will inform the complainant that he or she "may have the

right to file a private suit in federal court whether or not OCR finds a violation."

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Right to File a Separate Court Action

The complainant may have the right to file suit in Federal court, regardless of OCR’s findings. OCR does not

represent the complainant in case processing, so if the complainant wishes to file a court action, he or she must do

so through his or her own attorney or on his or her own through the court’s pro se clerk’s office.

If a complainant alleges discrimination prohibited by the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, a civil action in

Federal court can be filed only after the complainant has exhausted administrative remedies. Administrative

remedies are exhausted when either of the following has occurred:

1) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint with OCR and OCR has made no

finding; or

2) OCR issues a finding in favor of the recipient. If this occurs, OCR will promptly notify the complainant

and will provide additional information about the right to file for injunctive relief.

Prohibition against Intimidation or Retaliation

An institution under the jurisdiction of the Department of Education may not intimidate, threaten, coerce, or

retaliate against anyone who asserts a right protected by the civil rights laws that OCR enforces, or who

cooperates in an investigation. Anyone who believes that he or she has been intimidated or retaliated against

should file a complaint with OCR.

Investigatory Use of Personal Information

In order to investigate a complaint, OCR may need to collect and analyze personal information such as student

records or employment records. No law requires anyone to give personal information to OCR and no formal

sanctions will be imposed on complainants or other persons who do not cooperate in providing information

during the complaint investigation or resolution process. However, if OCR is unable to obtain the information

necessary to investigate a complaint, we may have to close the complaint.


The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, govern

the use of personal information that is submitted to all Federal agencies and their individual components,

including OCR. The Privacy Act of 1974 protects individuals from the misuse of personal information held by

the Federal government. It applies to records that are maintained by the government that are retrieved by the

individual’s name, social security number, or other personal identifier. It regulates the collection, maintenance,

use and dissemination of certain personal information in the files of Federal agencies.

The information that OCR collects is analyzed by authorized personnel within the agency and will be used only

for authorized civil rights compliance and enforcement activities. However, in order to investigate or resolve a

complaint, OCR may need to reveal certain information to persons outside the agency to verify facts or gather

additional information. Such details could include the age or physical condition of a complainant. Also, OCR

may be required to reveal information requested under FOIA, which gives the public the right of access to records

of Federal agencies. OCR will not release any information to any other agency or individual except in the one of

the 11 instances defined in the Department's regulation at 34 C.F.R. § 5b.9(b).

OCR does not reveal the name or other identifying information about an individual unless it is necessary for

completion of an investigation or for enforcement activities against an institution that violates the laws, or unless

such information is required to be disclosed under the FOIA or the Privacy Act. OCR will keep the identity of

complainants confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of the civil rights laws, or

unless disclosure is required under the FOIA, the Privacy Act or otherwise by law.

FOIA gives the public the right of access to records and files of Federal agencies. Individuals may obtain items

from many categories of records of the Federal government, not just materials that apply to them personally.

OCR must honor requests for records under FOIA, with some exceptions. Generally, OCR is not required to

release documents during the case evaluation and investigation process or enforcement proceedings, if the release

could affect the ability of OCR to do its job. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A). Also, a Federal agency may refuse a

request for records if their release would result in an unwarranted invasion of privacy of an individual. 5 U.S.C. §

552(b)(6) and (7)(C). Also, a request for other records, such as medical records, may be denied where disclosure

would be a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy

englishcomplaint form.rev.042313 adalberto cervantes rodriguez

Technology

adalberto cervantessent

injured persons address

email address

zip code

following information

phone numberday

basis of race

persons signature