enhancing the success of students in arkansas colleges and universities jim purcell
Post on 19-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Enhancing the Success of Students in Arkansas Colleges and Universities
Jim Purcell
“Picking a college is like falling in love.”Stephen Joel Trachtenberg, President
George Washington University
It is a relationship
• Chosen because of: – Convenience– Cost – Arranged– Family tradition– Lack of knowledge of other options
• Continues if:– it works for me – I am validated – I am successful– All involved parties work at it
• Transition points– Admission– Orientation– Every registration– Freshman to sophomore– Transfer– Entrance into major – Graduation
Significant moments in the relationship between a student and their college
What can faculty, staff and administrators do to enhance that relationship?
At the state level, what can be done to enhance student success?
Speed to Market and Close to Customer
Ed Barlow, Futurist:
1. Implement a series of initiatives that expedite the number of degrees produced and the speed at which degrees are produced.
2. Enhance the production of degrees in high –demand programs that are needed for the modern Arkansas economy.
3. Incentivize students to complete a degree and to work in Arkansas.
1. Strengthening the Arkansas Education Pipeline
2. Improving Preparation 3. Decreasing Remediation 4. Accessing Financial Aid5. Increasing Retention and Graduation6. Enhancing Funding and Governance 7. Addressing Data Needs8. Supporting Economic Development 9. Issues for Further Study
Senator Jimmy Jeffress
The following successes were accomplished with the help of legislative support during the last two years:•Developed a universal scholarship web application that allows students to apply for the state’s 21 scholarship programs via one online application. • Reduced the major factor for tuition and fee increases in Arkansas which were caused by large numbers of tuition waivers in the form of institutional scholarships. These tuition waivers resulted in higher tuition costs for all students. • Provided for the seamless transfer of credits earned in completing an AA/AS degree to the universities. • Developed a “Comprehensive Accountability Report” that provides the good, bad and ugly of higher education (in general) and for each institution. • Expanded the eligibility for the state’s need-based scholarships to adult learners. Low income adults can now qualify for a $1,000 annual scholarship. • Developed the state’s lottery scholarship criteria. In addition to $53 million in new financial aid for traditional students, scholarship funds were also allocated for adult learners/returning students ($12 million) and currently enrolled students ($43 million for 2010 to be phased out over the next 3 years). The scholarship criteria for continuing eligibility are designed to encourage speed to graduation.• Established a standard remediation exit measure as a requisite for students moving into credit bearing courses in the remediated subject.
The following initiatives were conducted through ADHE policy revisions and receipt of grant funds.
• Based ten percent of the funding formula upon course completion FTE. • Doubled the academic program degree production standard from 3 to 6 degrees per
year . Slightly lower productivity standards for STEM and technical majors.• Altered the academic program review process to include technical experts for AS and
Certificates and out-of-state reviewers for BA/BS baccalaureate. • Developed a “financial condition” report that shows how higher education institutions
spend and manage their money. • Changed the metric for determining if an institution was financially viable to borrow
funds. In addition, institutions had to declare source of funds for maintenance. • Provided extensive professional development on student success strategies. • Promoted the importance of college readiness, college attendance and financial aid in
Arkansas high schools. Acquired more than $1,000,000 a year in funding from grants. • Provided for 43 Career Coaches to work in Arkansas’s poorest communities and high
schools with low college attendance. • Conducted a two-year adult learner task force of institutional leaders to determine
how our institutions could be more adult-friendly. • Implemented initiatives to develop sustainable communities by creating partnerships
between colleges/universities, community-based organizations and state agencies.
Top three reasons students leave college:
• Academic difficulty • Money• Personal Issues
Colleges and Universities have a moral obligation to assist in the success of students they have admitted
State Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of AdultPopulation with Bachelor's Degree or Higher (2008)
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000
$28,000
$30,000
$32,000
$34,000
$36,000
$38,000
15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Percentage of Adult Population with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Per
Cap
ita
Inco
me
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2006
DC
TX
NM
FL
NDNC
AL
IN
LA
MIWI
SD
WY
TN
NV
AR
IAOH
ID
SCKY
MS
WV
MOME
AZ
VA
NJ
PA
MD
MT
CT
MA
CO
NE
AK
GAHI
KSOR
DE
IL
RI MN
WA
UT
VT
NHNY
CA
OK
No state with a low proportion of Bachelor’s degrees has a high per
capita income.
No state with a high proportion of Bachelor’s
degrees has a low per capita income.
2008= 18.8%
2002= 19.7%
2006 2005 200220072008
12
By the end of this decade, more than 60% of jobs will require college education1
26%Today, 26% of Arkansas’s young adults aged 25-34 have a college degree.2
1 Carnevale, T., Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, 2009. High-growth fields based on national projections of total new and replacement jobs. http://cew.georgetown.edu/research/jobs/79012.html2 “College degree” means an associate degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2008 (from U.S. Census Bureau, 2008 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample File.) http://www.higheredinfo.org
Is 26% enough?
What percentage of our young adults have a college degree? (associates or bachelors)
Current percentage of young adults (25-34) with a college degree3
3 “College degree” means an associate degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2008 (from U.S. Census Bureau, 2008 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample File.) http://www.higheredinfo.org
45% - 53%
39% - 44%
33% - 38%
26% - 32%
31%
36%
36%
29%31%
28%
41%
34%
36%
38%
48%34%
41%
44%
44%
50%
30%
37%
39%
34%
43%
46%
30%
40%
35%
26%
32%
36%
32%
48%
28%
43%
31%
36%
36%
32%42%
36%
36%
34%
28%
45%
44%46%
53%
46%
46%
41%
36%
43%
Current percentage of young adults (25-34) with a college degree3
3 “College degree” means an associate degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2008 (from U.S. Census Bureau, 2008 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample File.) http://www.higheredinfo.org
Arka
nsas
Loui
siana
Nev
ada
Wes
t Virg
inia
New
Mex
ico
Alas
kaO
klah
oma
Ariz
ona
Tenn
esse
eTe
xas
Alab
ama
Kent
ucky
Miss
issip
piG
eorg
iaId
aho
Sout
h Ca
rolin
aW
yom
ing
Flor
ida
Calif
orni
aD
elaw
are
Indi
ana
Mai
neM
ichi
gan
Mon
tana
Nor
th C
arol
ina
Ohi
oO
rego
nM
issou
riU
tah
Was
hing
ton
Wisc
onsin
Colo
rado
Haw
aii
Kans
asVi
rgin
iaIll
inoi
sPe
nnsy
lvan
iaRh
ode
Isla
ndN
ebra
ska
Sout
h D
akot
aVe
rmon
tM
aryl
and
Conn
ectic
utIo
wa
New
Ham
pshi
reN
ew Je
rsey
Min
neso
taN
ew Y
ork
Nor
th D
akot
aM
assa
chus
etts
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
26%
53%
U.S. Census BureauData Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3)
18.1% - 28.1%
12.0% - 18.0%
6.3% - 11.9%
White15.5%
Union14.9%
Yell10.9%
Scott16.4%
Clark19.8%
Ashley10.1%
Polk10.9%
Pope19.0%
Drew17.3%
Clay7.4%
Benton20.3%
Desha11.1%
Lee7.3%
Logan9.4%
Saline9.6%
Pulaski28.1%
Arkansas12.2%
Newton11.8%
Lonoke14.6%
Cross9.9%
Chicot11.7%
Dallas9.6%
Stone9.8%
Prairie9.0%
Sharp9.2%
Phillips12.4%
Grant11.0%
Madison10.1%
Fulton10.5%Carroll
13.8%
Jefferson15.7%
Miller12.5%
Searcy8.4%
Pike10.1%
Izard11.7%
Marion10.4%
Poinsett6.3%
Boone12.7%
Baxter12.8%
Garland18.0%
Perry11.1%
Sevier16.6%
Mississippi11.3%
Bradley11.9%
Washington24.5%
Monroe8.4%
Johnson13.1%
Ouachita12.7%
Lincoln7.6%
Columbia16.8%
Nevada10.7%
Greene10.9%
Jackson10.3%Franklin
11.0%
Faulkner25.2%
Calhoun7.3%
Conway11.5%
Van Buren11.5%
Craighead20.9%
Randolph10.6%
Crawford9.7%
Woodruff8.0%
Cleburne13.9%
Montgomery8.8%
Lawrence8.5%
Crittenden12.8%
St. Francis10.3%
Cleveland10.0%
Hot Spring11.2%
Sebastian8.4%
Little River9.9%
Howard11.6%
Hempstead11.0%
Lafayette9.5%
Independence13.7%
Arkansas ranked 51st (16.7%) Nation-wide in 2000 for Bachelors & Higher
Percent of County Populationthat hold Bachelors & Higher 2000
Pope 19.0%
Washington 24.5%
Pulaski 28.1%
Clark 19.8%
Benton 20.3%
Faulkner 25.2%
Craighead 20.9%
Percent of County Population(Associate Degree Holder) 2000
U.S. Census BureauData Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3)
4.19% - 6.37%
3.00% - 4.18%
1.80% - 2.99%
White3.97%
Union4.18%
Yell1.80%
Scott5.07%
Clark3.23%
Ashley2.83%
Polk3.95%
Pope3.45%
Drew2.84%
Benton4.60%
Desha2.13%
Logan4.02%
Saline4.56%
Pulaski4.69%
Arkansas3.16%
Newton3.35%
Lonoke5.30%
Chicot2.47%
Prairie3.16%
Dallas2.99%
Clay2.55%
Phillips4.90%
Madison2.49%
Fulton2.77%Carroll
3.82%
Grant2.95%
Jefferson3.27%
Miller3.99%
Cross3.17%
Lee4.30%
Stone2.50%
Searcy3.58%
Sharp3.75%
Pike2.42%
Marion4.69%
Poinsett2.20%
Boone5.18%
Izard4.29%
Baxter4.69%
Garland4.45%
Sevier6.37%
Perry2.71%
Mississippi4.00%
Bradley2.32%
Washington3.51%
Monroe3.23%
Johnson1.97%
Ouachita4.91%
Lincoln3.34%
Columbia2.86%
Nevada2.42%
Greene2.86%
Jackson3.07%Franklin
4.55%
Faulkner4.15%
Calhoun3.48%
Conway2.92%
Van Buren3.15%
Craighead3.53%
Randolph3.20%
Crawford5.40%
Woodruff2.01%
Cleburne3.97%
Montgomery4.04%
Lawrence2.66%
Crittenden3.20%
St. Francis3.76%
Cleveland3.43%
Hot Spring4.00%
Sebastian3.69%
Little River3.63%
Howard3.35%
Hempstead3.24%
Lafayette3.23%
Independence2.90%
Arkansas ranked 50th (4%) Nation-wide in 2000 for Associate Degree Holders
Where Arkansas Bachelors Degree (and higher) Holders live
(2000)
U.S. Census BureauData Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3)
23.00%
2.31% - 8.00%
0.10% - 2.30%
Yell0.5%
White2.3%
Union1.5%
Scott0.2%
Polk0.5%
Clark0.9%
Pope2.3%
Drew0.7%
Ashley0.5%
Clay0.3%
Benton7.0%
Desha0.4%
Lee0.2%
Pike0.3%
Logan0.5%
Miller1.1%
Saline3.2%
Izard0.4%
Grant0.4%
Pulaski23.0%
Arkansas0.6%
Newton0.2%
Lonoke1.7%
Cross0.4%
Chicot0.4%
Dallas0.2%
Stone0.3%
Perry0.3%
Prairie0.2%
Sharp0.4%
Phillips0.7%
Fulton0.3%
Madison0.3%
Carroll0.8%
Jefferson2.9%
Searcy0.2%
Marion0.4%
Poinsett0.4%
Boone1.0%
Baxter1.3%
Garland3.9%
Sevier0.3%
Mississippi1.2%
Bradley0.3%
Washington8.0%
Monroe0.2%
Johnson0.7%
Ouachita0.8%
Lincoln0.3%
Columbia0.9%
Nevada0.2%
Greene0.9%
Jackson0.4%Franklin
0.4%
Faulkner4.4%
Howard0.4%
Calhoun0.1%
Conway0.5%
Van Buren0.5%
Craighead3.7%
Randolph0.4%
Crawford1.1%
Woodruff0.2%
Cleburne0.8%
Montgomery0.2%
Lawrence0.3%
Crittenden1.3%
St. Francis0.6%
Cleveland0.2%
Hot Spring0.8%
Sebastian4.3%
Little River0.3%
Hempstead0.6%
Lafayette0.2%
Independence1.1%
Arkansas ranked 51st (16.7%) Nation-wide in 2000 for Bachelors & Higher
60% of all AR college graduates reside in 9 counties
Pulaski 23.%
Where Arkansas Associate Degree Holders live
(2000)
U.S. Census BureauData Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3)
15.90%
1.96% - 6.83%
0.17% - 1.95%
White2.41%
Union1.80%
Yell0.35%
Scott4.07%
Clark0.64%
Ashley0.64%
Polk0.77%
Pope1.70%
Drew0.47%
Benton6.58%
Desha0.29%
Logan0.87%
Saline1.19%
Arkansas0.63%
Newton0.28%
Lonoke2.55%
Chicot0.32%
Pulaski15.90%
Prairie0.30%
Dallas0.26%
Clay0.45%
Phillips1.09%
Madison0.33%
Fulton0.33%Carroll
0.95%
Grant0.46%
Jefferson2.49%
Miller1.48%
Cross0.56%
Lee0.49%
Stone0.29%
Searcy0.37%
Sharp0.53%
Pike0.27%
Marion0.78%
Poinsett0.53%
Boone1.72%
Izard0.59%
Baxter1.95%
Garland4.01%
Sevier6.83%
Perry0.27%
Mississippi1.82%
Bradley0.28%
Washington4.74%
Monroe0.31%
Johnson0.42%
Ouachita1.34%
Lincoln0.46%
Columbia0.66%
Nevada0.23%
Greene1.01%
Jackson0.54%Franklin
0.76%
Faulkner3.03%
Calhoun0.20%
Conway0.56%
Van Buren0.53%
Craighead2.58%
Randolph0.56%
Crawford2.62%
Woodruff0.17%
Cleburne0.99%
Montgomery0.38%
Lawrence0.45%
Crittenden1.39%
St. Francis0.66%
Cleveland0.28%
Hot Spring1.17%
Sebastian0.31%
Little River0.47%
Howard0.45%
Hempstead0.69%
Lafayette0.26%
Independence0.95%
Arkansas ranked 50th (4%) Nation-wide in 2000 for Associate Degree Holders
58% of all associates degree recipients reside in 12 counties
• Strengthening the Arkansas Education Pipeline
4641
29
1612
4
100
74
9th GradeEnrollment
High SchoolGrads
EnrolledDirectly into
College
First-timeFull-timeDegreeSeekingCohort
RetainedAfter 1 Year
GraduatedWithin 6Years
WithAssociate
Degree
WithBachelorDegree
Percent 96-97 Arkansas 9th Grader’s Progression into High School and College (percent)
100%
71%
28%
Fall 2000 College Freshmen
96-97 Arkansas 9th Grader’s Progression into High School and College (number)
17,11615,172
10,701
5,817
37,160
1,4934,324
27,335
9th GradeEnrollment
High SchoolGrads
EnrolledDirectly into
College
First-timeFull-timeDegreeSeekingCohort
RetainedAfter 1 Year
GraduatedWithin 6Years
WithAssociate
Degree
WithBachelorDegree
Fall 2000 College Freshmen
100%
71%28%
Arkansas_cnty.shp12 - 2526 - 4950 - 74
Reading Remediation Rates by CountyFall 2007
% Needing Remediation
First-time entering (full- and part-time) students seeking an associate or baccalaureate degree.
Arkansas_cnty.shp16 - 2526 - 4950 - 69
English Remediation Rates by CountyFall 2007
% Needing Remediation
First-time entering (full- and part-time) students seeking an associate or baccalaureate degree.
Arkansas_cnty.shp23 - 2526 - 4950 - 81
% Needing Remediation
Math Remediation Rates by CountyFall 2007
First-time entering (full- and part-time) students seeking an associate or baccalaureate degree.
Arkansas_cnty.shp33 - 4950 - 7475 - 93
% Needing Remediation
Unduplicated Remediation Rates by CountyFall 2007
First-time entering (full- and part-time) students seeking an associate or baccalaureate degree.
Arkansas Public Universities Six-Year Graduation Rates (2001 Cohort)
25.2%
22.3%
28.8%
19.2%
29.5%
58.9%
45.9%
0.0% 70.0%
Reading*
English *
Math *
Math, Reading and English
Any Remediation
Not Remediated
Fall Cohort
A student who has to take remediation graduates at less than half the rate of students who come to college with the requisite skills.
Arkansas Public Community Colleges Three-Year Graduation Rates (2004 Cohort)
10.8%
11.5%
14.1%8.9%
14.6%
36.7%
21.2%
0.0% 50.0%
Reading*
English *
Math *
Math, Reading and English
Any Remediation
Not Remediated
Fall Cohort
Cost of Remediation
$53,800,000Equivalent to the combined budget of seven of Arkansas’s community colleges.
2007-08 - $65.7 million with $24 million (36%) of those expenditures subsidized by state general revenues.
While we did not create the remediation crisis, How we do remediation has to change:
Targeted FasterBetter
AN ACT TO REQUIRE CLEAR EXIT STANDARDS FOR ALL REMEDIAL COURSES TAKEN AT STATE-
SUPPORTED INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION; TO IMPROVE THE TEACHING
TECHNIQUES OF REMEDIAL COURSES; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
Representatives: J. Roebuck, D. Hutchinson, M. Burris, Carnine, Clemmer, Cole, Nickels, Saunders, G. Smith, Stewart, Abernathy
Senators : G. Baker, Madison
HB 1990/ Act 971
• The board, in collaboration with state-supported institutions of higher education, shall develop by institution uniform measurable exit standards for remedial courses that are comparable to the ACT or SAT equivalent required for college-level enrollment in credit courses to be implemented no later than the fall semester of 2010.
If you got into remediation because you did not meet a certain threshold, you should get out of remediation when you meet that threshold
com·pa·ra·ble: • able to be likened to another; similar. • of equivalent quality; worthy of comparison
ADHE preference: Nationally normed test that has been correlated to the ACT.
Other aspects of the Act 971• The board shall work with state-supported institutions of higher
education to:– (A) Develop innovative alternatives to traditional instruction and delivery
methods for remedial courses; and– (B) Provide professional development opportunities to help remedial
education faculty gain knowledge in best practices and trends in the instruction and delivery of remedial education.
… by institution uniform measurable exit standards
Institution English Math Reading
4-YearASUJ Compass Compass Compass/Nelson-DennyATU Compass Compass CompassHSU Compass Compass CompassSAUM Compass Compass CompassUAF Compass and Essay MyMathTest CompassUAFS Asset Asset AssetUALR Compass * CompassUAM Asset Asset AssetUAPB Compass Compass CompassUCA Compass Compass Compass
Institution English Math Reading2-YearANC Compass/Asset Compass/Asset Nelson-DennyASUB ACT/Compass/Asset/SAT ACT/Compass/Asset/SAT ACT/Compass/Asset/SATASUMH Compass Compass CompassASUN Compass Compass CompassBRTC Compass Compass CompassCCCUA Compass/Asset Compass/Asset Compass/AssetEACC Compass/Asset Compass/Asset Compass/AssetMSCC Compass Compass CompassNPCC TABE TABE TABENAC Compass Compass CompassNWACC Compass E-Write Compass CompassOTC Compass E-Write Compass Nelson-DennyOC Compass Compass CompassPCCUA Compass/Asset Compass/Asset Compass/Asset/Nelson-Denny
PTC Compass Compass CompassRMCC Compass/Asset Compass/Asset Compass/AssetSACC Compass Compass Nelson-DennySEAC Compass Compass CompassSAUT Compass Compass CompassUACCB Compass/Asset Compass/Asset Compass/AssetUACCH Compass Compass CompassUACCM ACT/Compass ACT/Compass ACT/Compass
… by institution uniform measurable exit standards
Point of Contention
• develop by institution uniform measurable exit standards for remedial courses that are comparable to the ACT or SAT equivalent required for college-level enrollment in credit courses
Implementation highlightsAll students enrolled in developmental courses that immediately lead to college-level courses must be tested in Fall 2010 at the end of the semester using an examination comparable to the ACT. Students should not be barred from enrolling in college-level courses based on their developmental course post-test score for Fall 2010.
Students that do not attain a score comparable to an ACT of 19 will not be required by ADHE to undergo further developmental instruction—that decision will be at the discretion of the institution awarding the developmental course credit.
Implementation highlights There may come a time where we, as an academic community, are comfortable with utilizing an exit assessment to determine course progression. It should be based upon research over the next few years relating to modifications of our remedial education courses and subsequent student success. ADHE will collect data to determine the number of developmental students who meet the ACT 19 threshold upon exiting the developmental courses for the purposes of guiding our future conversations.
Post-testing developmental education and the early taking of developmental coursework for Lottery Scholarship recipients will lead to better prepared students and higher retention and graduation rates.
5.5% - 7.2%
4.5% - 5.4%
3.1% - 4.4%
2.0% - 3.0%
2005 Loan Default Rates
Source: U.S. Department of Education
6.8%
(5th)
6.9%
7.1%
7.2%
2.0%
2.6%
6.9%
2.2% (DC)
2.3% (VT)
6.8% - 9.7%
5.0% - 6.7%
3.6% - 4.9%
2.3% - 3.5%
2006 Loan Default Rates
Source: U.S. Department of Education
7.6%
(4th)
8.8%
9.3%
9.7%
7.4%
2.3%
2.4%
2.4% (VT)
2.4%
7.6% - 9.8%
6.2% - 7.5%
4.5% - 6.1%
2.3% - 4.4%
2007 Loan Default Rates
Source: U.S. Department of Education
9.0%
(4th)
9.3%
9.3%
9.8%
8.8%
2.8%
2.3%3.1%
How college is paid for has to change.
• Academic Challenge:– $2,500 for Community College students– $5,000 for University students– Traditional Students --$53 million – Adult learners/returning students --$12 million– Current Achievers --$43 million
• for 2010 to be phased out over the next 3 years.
– The scholarship criteria for continuing eligibility are designed to encourage speed to graduation.
• Expansion of need-based aid to Adults
It is our hope that the Arkansas Academic Challenge Lottery Scholarship will:
increase student successreduce student loansdecrease loan default ratesprepare more students for high wage high demand
jobsbenefit Arkansas’s economyOutreach:
SayGoCollegeCareer Coaches
The Lottery Act requires students to:--- complete remediation within the first 30 hours of coursework --- take 15 hours each semester (first term Freshmen can take 12)--- 8 semesters going full-time
Financial Aid Applications as of March 30, 2010
• Academic Challenge Scholarship– Nontraditional 16,483 – Traditional 12,849
• GO! Opportunities Grant 18,171 • Workforce Improvement Grant 6,948• Governor's Scholars Program 6,100 • Teacher Opportunity Program 1,020 • Arkansas Single Parent Scholarship Fund 428 • State Teacher Education Program 395 • Military Dependents Scholarship 288• Minority Teacher Scholarship 231
Student Transfer
• Arkansas is ranked fourth among states in adult migration within the state . . .
Thus
• Seamless transfer of credits is essential to student success
Social Science
Humanities/ Fine Arts
Math
US History/Gov’tEnglishScience
Lower Level General Education Courses: Required by major Prerequisites for major courses Required by an accrediting/licensure body
State Core 35 hrs.
Major Program RequirementsMajor Requirements:
Minimum of 30 hours with 20 hours of upper level coursework in the major.
Upper level major courses
Lower level major courses
Arkansas Baccalaureate Degree Education Requirements
Institutional general education core requirements 10-25 hrs
Minimum of 40 hours of upper level courses are required for a baccalaureate
AA/AS/AAT
Issues needing to be addressed
• AA/AS programs must contain transferable college credit.
• Universities need to clarify what specific general educations courses are required for the major.
Arkansas Higher Education is Changing
123,139
138,809
173,974
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
En
roll
men
t
Annual Unduplicated Enrollment, Public Institutions Only
41 percent increase in enrollment
Credit Hours Taken Are Increasing
2,266,770
2,647,718
3,331,478
2,000,000
2,200,000
2,400,000
2,600,000
2,800,000
3,000,000
3,200,000
3,400,000
AY1997 AY1998 AY1999 AY2000 AY2001 AY2002 AY2003 AY2004 AY2005 AY2006 AY2007 AY2008 AY2009
SSCH
Academic Year
SSCH of Public Institutions
47 percent increase in credit hours
Credentials Awarded are Increasing
15,531 15,498 15,857
16,674 16,942
18,132
19,840 20,162
21,608
22,475
23,543
25,019
27,833
15,000
17,000
19,000
21,000
23,000
25,000
27,000
29,000
AY1997 AY1998 AY1999 AY2000 AY2001 AY2002 AY2003 AY2004 AY2005 AY2006 AY2007 AY2008 AY2009
Cre
den
tial
s
Academic Year
Credentials Awarded, Public Institutions Only
79 % Increase in Credentials
234 % Certificate of Proficiency
31 % BA/BS Degrees
192 % Technical Certificates
120 % Associates Degrees
49 % Masters Degrees
93 % Doctoral Degrees
CP, 4,026 14%
TC, 3,716 13%
ASSOC., 6,264 23%
BACH., 9,682 35%
MASTERS, 3,150
11%
DOCTOR; 288; 1%
FIRSTPROF; 506; 2%OTHER; 201; 1%
2009 Degree Type
We all have a role to playIssues that higher education will be addressing in the next few years
• Improving remediation – assure skill attainment and maximize student success
• Reduction of tuition-based scholarships to 20% of tuition
• Seamless transfer of credit among institutions • Administration of the Arkansas Lottery Scholarship• Maintaining scholarship programs (fund balances, etc)• Maintaining state support for institutions • Increased accountability• Distance learning• Program viability/review
civic involvementcivic involvementvolunteer activity by
education levels
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003). Volunteering in the United States, 2003. USDL03-888. U.S. Department of Labor.
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some College
B.A. or Higher
9.9%(48 hours)
21.7%(48 hours)
34.1%(52 hours)
45.6% (60 hours)
Perc
enta
ge V
olun
teer
ing
blood donation by education level, 1994:
Source: DBD Worldwide. (2000). DBD Lifestyle Survey. Chicago. Available at www.bowlingalone.com.
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some College
B.A. or Higher
6%
11%
13%
17%
Perc
enta
ge D
onati
ng B
lood
percentage who donate regularly
civic involvementcivic involvement
participation assistance programs
Source: Postsecondary Education Opportunity, May 28, 1997, pg 47.
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some College& Bachelor’s
Degree or More
24.3%
10.2%
4.6%
Ever Participated in Assistance Programs
education level
governmentgovernment
governmentgovernmentincarceration rates by
education levels
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some CollegeB.A. or Higher
1.9%
1.2%
0.3%0.1%
Perc
enta
ge In
carc
erat
ed
Source: Harlow, C.W. (2003). Education and Correctional Populations. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice. NCJ195670.
economicPercent Below Poverty
Threshold, 2004
economicPercent Below Poverty
Threshold, 2004
Census Bureau
40%
30%
10%
0%
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some College
B.A. or Higher
32%
15%
10%
4%
Perc
enta
ge H
ome
Ow
ners
hip
20%
economiceconomicunemployment rates and
education level, 2004
Source: Employment Policy Institute
10
8
6
4
2
0
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some CollegeB.A. or Higher
9.7%
7.5%
5.1%4.6%
Quality of LifeQuality of LifeHome Ownership
Census Bureau, American Housing Survey for the United States:2005
80%
70%
60%
50%
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma Some College
B.A. or Higher
58%
69%66%
75%
Perc
enta
ge H
ome
Ow
ners
hip
Seatbelt Use while intoxicated, 1990
Source: American Journal of Public Health
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Less Than High School Diploma
High School Diploma
Some College
B.A. or Higher
39%41%
52%
66%
Perc
enta
ge D
onati
ng B
lood
percentage who use seatbelt
SafetySafety
15%20%
31%
78%
economiceconomic
Average family income by educational attainment,
2003
Source: Postsecondary Education Opportunity, 2005
25
175
50
100
75
125
150
0LT-9 9-12 HSG Some ProfMA PhDBAAA
Inco
me
($00
0)
College
3,798,9405,254,193Professional degree
2,527,3243,982,577Doctorate
1,507,8232,963,076Master's degree
$1,111,921$2,567,174Bachelor's degree
346,1201,801,373Associate degree
270,5691,725,822Some college, no degree
01,455,253High school graduate
-304,5551,150,698High school dropout
-$478,903$976,350Less than 9th grade
DifferenceCompared to
High School Graduate
EstimatedLifetimeEarnings
Education Level
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 2005
The Impact of Education on Individuals:Lifetime Earnings
economiceconomic
At the end of WWII, the U.S made a bold decision to invest in the future of its economy by providing $1.9 billion annually to the education of returning veterans of the war. This commitment to human capital helped enable the WWII generation to become the “greatest generation.”
Possibly, Arkansas’s greatest generation is at the schoolhouse door waiting for the opportunity to propel Arkansas into the global economy.
AY2005 AY2006 AY2007 AY2008 AY2009 140,000
145,000
150,000
155,000
160,000
165,000
170,000
175,000
180,000
154,125
173,974
Annual Unduplicated Enrollment, Public Institutions Only
Academic Year
En
roll
men
tArkansas Higher Education is Changing
13 percent increase in enrollment
Credit Hours Taken Are Increasing
2,990,779
3,331,478
2,000,000
2,200,000
2,400,000
2,600,000
2,800,000
3,000,000
3,200,000
3,400,000
AY2005 AY2006 AY2007 AY2008 AY2009
SS
CH
Academic Year
SSCH of Public Institutions
11 percent increase in credit hours
Credentials Awarded are Increasing
21,608 22,475
23,543
25,019
27,833
15,000
17,000
19,000
21,000
23,000
25,000
27,000
29,000
AY2005 AY2006 AY2007 AY2008 AY2009
Cre
den
tial
s
Academic Year
Credentials Awarded, Public Institutions Only
29 % Increase in Credentials