entrepreneurship, innovation, and competitiveness professor michael j. enright enright, scott &...
TRANSCRIPT
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 1
Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Competitiveness
Professor Michael J. Enright
Enright, Scott & Associates
University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute for Economics and Business Strategy
Astana Economic Forum, 2015
2015-05
© Copyright Michael J. Enright , 2015 This presentation is incomplete without the spoken commentary.
Please do not duplicate, store, or transmit in any form without the permission of the author.
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 2
ESA and Competitiveness
• Professor Michael Enright helped design and then managed the Competitive Advantage of Nations Project at Harvard Business School in the 1980s
• ESA undertook the first competitiveness project in a developing country based on the CAON methodology (1992-94)
• ESA has undertaken detailed national, regional, and local competitiveness assessments in 20 countries all around the world
• ESA has made major methodological enhancements over the years to focus on the practical aspects of improving competitiveness
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 3
The Competitiveness Imperative
• The global economy is a tough environment and it promises to become only tougher in the future.
• Many of today’s problems have arisen because individuals, companies, and nations have tried to borrow, rather than earn their prosperity.
• More and more countries are entering international competition in more and more industries.
• Globalization and the rise of the “Flat World” are making enhanced competitiveness vital for all nations.
• The simple fact is that individuals, companies, and nations have to improve their competitiveness if they are to achieve a prosperity that is sustainable.
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 4
Our Approach to Competitiveness
1. Generate a proper overall competitiveness index
2. Use data and benchmarks creatively
3. Bring business into the frame
4. Organize the pieces into a useful framework
5. Develop strategies and policies appropriately
• The steps can be used individually or together
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 5
What is Competitiveness About?
• “Competitiveness equals productivity. Productivity should be the central goal of economic policy.” - Michael Porter
• “Productivity isn’t everything, but in the long run it is almost everything.” - Paul Krugman
• “Competitiveness is the set of institutions, policies, and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country.” – WEF
• A New Competitiveness Index, The ESA Productivity Competitiveness Index (EPCI)TM
– GNI / Pop(15-64) with highest value scaled to 100– One year snapshot and 3 year rolling average– Coverage 172 countries 1990-2014– Simple, performance only, measures productivity
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 6
ESA Competitiveness Index, EPCI1, 2014
Country Rank Index Country Rank Index
Norway 1 100.00 Singapore 13 46.71
Switzerland 2 80.37 Austria 14 46.40
Luxembourg 3 65.90 Netherlands 15 46.01
Qatar 4 65.77 Germany 16 45.07
Australia 5 63.30 Belgium 17 44.58
Macao 6 62.48 Iceland 18 42.32
Denmark 7 60.69 France 19 42.21
Sweden 8 60.11 Ireland 20 41.45
Kuwait 9 55.11 Japan 21 41.24
United States 10 51.91 United Kingdom 22 38.30
Canada 11 47.89 Israel 23 36.87
Finland 12 47.09 New Zealand 24 36.03
2015-05
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 7
ESA Competitiveness Index, EPCI1, 2014
Country Rank Index Country Rank Index
Estonia 36 17.29 Montenegro 70 6.82
Czech Republic 38 16.46 Belarus 73 6.58
Slovak Republic 41 15.35 Azerbaijan 74 6.54
Latvia 42 14.73 Macedonia 96 4.27
Lithuania 46 13.86 Ukraine 104 3.61
Russia 47 12.63 Armenia 110 3.38
Croatia 48 12.62 Georgia 111 3.34
Poland 52 11.66 Moldova 122 2.20
Kazakhstan 54 11.05 Uzbekistan 128 1.85
Romania 63 8.44 Kyrgyz Republic 142 1.18
Turkmenistan 69 6.99 Tajikistan 145 1.08
2015-05
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 8
ESA EPCI1, Kazakhstan Rank
20
14
20
13
20
12
20
11
20
10
20
09
20
08
20
07
20
06
20
05
20
04
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
19
99
19
98
19
97
19
96
19
95
19
94
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
54616366
73717678
8793
104102108
114115106104105105
9591
2015-05
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 9
Comparison EPCI1 and WEF Values, 2014
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
EPCI1
No
rma
lize
d W
EF The WEF index
does not come close to matching actual productivity measures
2015-05
WEF = EPCI1 line
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 10
Comparison EPCI1 and WEF Ranks, 2014
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
EPCI1
WE
F
The WEF ranks differ from the productivity- based ranks by an average of 17 positions out of 135
2015-05
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
WEF Rank “Too Low”
WEF Rank “Too High”
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 11
Using Data and Benchmarks Creatively
• Competitiveness reports are extremely useful as sources of data– WEF, IMD, CASS, IFC, WB KEI, HF, FI, UBS, Mercer, GEM, etc.
• But one must use the right comparisons and benchmarks– Versus the “world’s best” is relevant for only a few countries– Need to use the right benchmarks and sequencing
• ESA benchmarks – Past performance /Comparators / Competitors / Customers – What countries can we learn the most from?
• ESA takes the benchmarks and compares across a huge range of variables to find the gaps, opportunities, advantages, disadvantages
• ESA then prepares a detailed, country-specific, step-by-step roadmap to achieve improvement
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 12
Use Data and Benchmarks CreativelyA Sequenced Approach to Development
Status Quo Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 40%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
P6P5P4P3P2P1
ESA Index
2015-05
Change to match P2
Change to match P3
Change to match P4
Change to match P5
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 132015-05
Bring Business and Industry Into the FrameImportance-Performance Competitiveness Analysis TM
2Good performance,
but not so beneficial
1Leverage, market,
exploit, further develop
3Poor performance, but does not matter
much
4Fix, mitigate,
overcome
Importance
Per
form
ance
Low
Low
High
High
“Importance-Performance Competitiveness Analysis” and “IPCA” are both trademarks of Enright, Scott & Associates, Ltd.
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 14
IPCATM Australia Architectural Services
2015-05
Importance
Per
form
ance
1.00 4.00 7.001.00
4.00
7.00
4.90 4.90
4.504.504.70
5.004.90
4.50
4.90
4.404.60
3.10
5.50
4.504.25
4.40
5.00
3.10 3.00
4.40
5.40
4.704.60
3.80
4.504.78
4.00
4.895.004.70
5.40
4.90 4.90
3.44
2.89
4.56
3.44
4.103.78
4.33
2.67
3.80
4.604.80
4.11
3.22
4.40
3.33
4.004.30
4.60
3.22
4.104.00
4.504.404.11
4.674.89
4.56
4.224.004.00
4.504.80
4.40
3.30
4.003.75
5.50
4.00
3.50
4.80
3.20
4.404.44
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 15
Organize the Pieces into a Useful Framework
2015-05
CompetitiveIndustries/Activities
PotentialIndustries/Activities
Supranational Cluster FirmNational Industry
Source: Michael Enright
Competitiveness is not additive. No single level can make a nation, region, or city competitive, any single level can make it uncompetitive.
This is what the standard approaches miss.
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 16
So how do we improve productivity?
• Get more people employed in carrying out existing activities
• Carry out existing economic activities more efficiently (learning, better methods, better equipment, better organization, etc.)
• Add more value in existing goods and services (higher quality, more knowledge embedded, better branding, better logistics, etc.)
• Develop new goods and services that meet customer needs
• Etc.
• For many countries improving productivity means leveraging the knowledge-innovation-creative economy
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 17
The Knowledge-Innovation-Creative Economy
• Generates value through developing and leveraging knowledge, IP, and intangible assets
• The K-I-C economy includes– Science and technology-based business– Innovative service sectors / Creative and cultural industries– Use of advanced technology in “low-tech” and “mid-tech” industries– Brand development– Improved processes– New business models / marketing, distribution, management systems
• Any industry can be knowledge-intensive, innovative, creative
• Those that leverage the K-I-C economy benefit from the “Flat World,” those that don’t face difficult price competition
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 18
Entrepreneurship and the K-I-C Economy
• Entrepreneurs (and intrapreneurs) do the work of the K-I-C economy
• They combine new products, or new services, or new ways of doing things with productive resources and market demand
• Entrepreneurship involves the epitome of the K-I-C economy
• Entrepreneurial activities are the most knowledge-intensive, innovative, and creative activities carried out by the firm
• This is why the factors that influence entrepreneurship are so crucial to developing a K-I-C economy, enhancing productivity, and improving competitiveness
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 19
The GEM Report
• An extremely valuable perspective on competitiveness
• Related to the original Competitive Advantage of Nations Study at Harvard Business School (1990)– Focus on attitudes towards entrepreneurship and innovation– Use of factor-driven, efficiency-driven, innovation-driven, (wealth-
driven) stages of development
• Related to IFC Ease of Doing Business, WB Knowledge Economy– Basic requirements /Efficiency enhancers– Knowledge and innovation economy
• Adds variables specifically related to entrepreneurship obtained through extensive surveys– Early-state entrepreneurial activity– Entrepreneurial employee activity– Social entrepreneurial activity
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 20
Question: Do GEM indices match productivity measures?
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
EPCI1
No
rmal
ized
GE
M F
ram
ewo
rk
Co
nd
itio
ns A composite GEM
Framework Conditions Index does not match productivity measures
2015-05
GEM = EPCI1 line
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 21
0 20 40 60 800
20
40
60
80
EPCI1
No
rmal
ized
GE
M f
ram
ewo
rk
Co
nd
itio
ns
A composite GEM Framework Conditions Index based rank differs from a productivity based rank by an average of 16 positions out of 69
2015-05
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
Question: Do GEM indices match productivity measures?
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 22
Question: Is the “stages of development” model useful to separate countries?
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 23
Question: Is the “stages of development” model useful to separate countries?
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 24
Question: Is the “stages of development” model useful to separate countries?
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 25
Question: Is the “stages of development” model useful to separate countries?
2015-05
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 26
Question: Is all entrepreneurial activity a good thing?
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
EPCI1
No
rmal
ized
GE
M E
arly
Sta
ge
En
trep
ren
euri
al A
ctiv
ity
2015-05
GEM = EPCI1 line
Source: Enright, Scott & Associates
© Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 27
Conclusions
• Competitiveness is crucial to national economic development
• Competitiveness means being more productive, so competitiveness should be measured by productivity
• The knowledge-innovation-creative economy is all about improving productivity
• Entrepreneurs (and intrapreneurs) do the work of the knowledge-innovation-creative economy
• The GEM report provides a unique and valuable source on a critical contributor to competitiveness
• There are opportunities to re-organize GEM data for better effect
• We like our own overall approach to competitiveness
2015-05
For more information contact
© Copyright Michael J. Enright, 2015 This presentation is incomplete without the spoken commentary.
Please do not duplicate, store, or transmit in any form without the permission of the author.
Michael EnrightEnright, Scott & Associates
Phone: 852-3101-8650
Fax: 852-3101-9635
2015-05 © Copyright Michael Enright, 2015 28