environmental and social costs and benefits and how to account for them in natural resource...

37
Environmental and Social Costs and Benefits and How to Account for them in Natural Resource Decisionmaking Sandra Nichols Thiam Guinea Project Coordinator 1

Upload: corey-james

Post on 29-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Environmental and Social Costs and Benefits and How to Account

for them in Natural Resource Decisionmaking

Sandra Nichols ThiamGuinea Project Coordinator

2

Pourquoi industries extractives? Pourquoi les

mines?

3

ContaminationSometimes toxic or radioactiveLoss of drinking waterGroundwater impactsSedimentation, sometimes contaminatedHigher water levelsFloodingContamination, death of fish, aquatic life food chainErosionLoss of arable land

Changes to topographyDestruction of forestLoss of animal species or habitatDisplaced communitiesLoss of livelihoods, way of lifeCultural sitesDisparate impacts on womenClimate impactsToxins in the dust, sometimes radioactiveConflict, violence

4

Oil, Gas, Mining: What is at risk?

Water

Air

Land

5

Oil Spill

6

Mine Tailings Storage

7

Persistent Mine Waste ImpactsOk Tedi copper mine, PNG1984 – 200680 – 90 m tons of mine tailings released annually• 1,000 km of waterways impacted; flooding, contamination of water,fish, ag land• up to 3,000 km2 forest destroyed

Talvivaara, Finland2012 – present 1.2 m m3 water, sedimentpersistent overflows; contamination of heavy metals

8

Sudden Mine Waste Impacts Baia Mare, Romania Jan. 30, 2000

• 100,000 cubic meters water spilled when dam burst• cyanide and heavy metals

leaked into the Somes River, trib to the Danube

Mount Polley, BC, Canada August 2014• 4km2 tailings pond emptied in 4 days• 10 million ft3 water; 4.5 million ft3 slurry; • heavy metals

9

More than 25 years later, impacts just as severe in some places

March 24, 1989

Exxon Valdez oil tanker ran aground

10

Roman Mine in Great Britain

11

Understand the Risks

Cost-Benefit analysis traditionally considers only the costs and benefits internal to the project…

… environmental and social impacts are externalities…

… quantification of environmental harm controversial

12

Environmental (and Social) Impact Assessment

1. Screening2. Scoping3. Prediction4. Mitigation5. Management and monitoring6. Audit

13

Generalized EIA Process

14

Public Participation

• Central to E(S)IA process• Critical to project success• Often improves project • Must do stakeholder analysis to be

effective• Project proponent should pay for

potentially-impacted people to participate meaningfully

15

Prediction

• Assessments to set a baseline• Social and scientific studies• Identify potential impacts based on

the characteristics of the site• Identify alternative approaches for

the project

16

ContaminationSometimes toxic or radioactiveLoss of drinking waterGroundwater impactsSedimentation, sometimes contaminatedHigher water levelsFloodingContamination, death of fish, aquatic life food chainErosionLoss of arable land

Changes to topographyDestruction of forestLoss of animal species or habitatDisplaced communitiesLoss of livelihoods, way of lifeCultural sitesDisparate impacts on womenClimate impactsToxins in the dust, sometimes radioactiveConflict, violence

17

Mitigation of Impacts• Identify alterative operational and

technological approaches– Placement of infrastructure–Waste treatment and disposal– Runoff control– Dust suppression– Erosion control, etc…

• Throughout the project• Closure – Reclamation, Restoration,

Rehabilitation, Post-closure…?

18

Environmental Compensation

• Conservation of a similar area of land – no net loss– Biodiversity offsets– Ecosystem services esp. hydrology,

livelihoods

• Compensation funds•Complex valuation methodologies

19

Environmental Action/Management Plan

The guide to implement the approach identified by the prediction and mitigation phase of the EIA - Following mitigation measures- Carrying out compensation

measures etc.

20

Compliance Monitoring

Translating the rules to reality:• Can be costly• Highly technical• Informed public can help

21

Informed/participatory decisionmaking

• Due Process critical for proper Ex Ante consideration of env’l and social context and values

• Involves assuring that potentially impacted communities and their advocates and governments are capable of participating meaningfully

• Improves projects

22

Compensation to Communities

• Traditional village = tin roof tenement?

• Seedlings = mature fruit trees?

23

How to Share Benefits?

Central Government

Regional Government

local government

Communities

Communities

Regional Government

Local Government

Community

Community

Local Government

Community

Community

Local Goverment Community

Regional Government

Local Government Community

local government Community

extractive industry

24

Local Content

• Increasingly required by local law• Very context specific• Services, supplies and jobs

25

What if…?

26

Preparedness

• Plan ahead – be ready • Consider downstream/transboundary effects• Consider potential political constraints• Joint UNEP/OCHA Environmental

Emergencies Unit

27

Instruments for Enforcing Environmental and Social Protections

• Contract provisions• National lawe.g. Water laws protect basic

human needs; ownership

• Implmenting regulations• Constitutions• Lender standards: IFC-PS; EP; VP• Associations of companies: ICMM, IPIECA• International laws/agreements• Laws and standards of the country where the

company is based

28

Who is responsible for applying environmental and social

safeguards?• Government• Company• Community• Checks and balances critical! Need

effective monitoring but also strong judiciary and legislature

• These are inter-ministerial concerns: authorizing environment

29

Tools applied successfully

• Leading oil companies have pledged to avoid operating in natural World Heritage Sites

• Multi-sectoral decisionmaking: HidroAysén mega-dam project in 2014

• El Salvador froze the issuance of all mining licenses to conduct env’l study in 2008

30

PASCUA LAMA

31

32

• Planned to start construction in 2004

• EIAs approved in both countries in 2006

• Suit to stop the project because of risk of harms to water supply

• $5 billion spent• Construction stopped in 2013;

project now in care and maintenance

Pascua Lama

33

When should Env’l and Social Impacts be Considered?

34

35

StrategicEnvironmental (and Social) Impact Assessment

Important to take a comprehensive view of resources…

… and look at project specific impacts.

36

Env’l and Social Reasons not to develop a deposit?

• Primary forests• Biodiversity hotspots i.e. those listed

by IUCN• Water-producing regions/tops of

watersheds• World Heritage Sites – natural and

cultural sites• Indigenous lands• Conflict zones

37

Thank you

Questions?

Sandra Nichols Thiam

[email protected]