environmental and social impact assessment (esia) · 2020-07-02 · table 5-2: evaluation symbols...

144
1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) For Photovoltaic Power Plant Sainshand, Mongolia 30/9/2016 By Desert Solar Power One LLC

Upload: others

Post on 11-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

1

Environmental and Social

Impact Assessment

(ESIA) For Photovoltaic Power Plant Sainshand,

Mongolia

30/9/2016

By Desert Solar Power One LLC

Page 2: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

2

Table of Contents

1. Introduction and Project Background………………………………………….9

1.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………. …..9

1.2 Project Background …………………………………………………….........10

1.3 Scope of the ESIA…………………………………………………………..11

1.4 Methodology for the ESIA…………………………………………………12

1.4.1 Scoping……………………………………………………………..…13

1.4.2 Baseline Data Collection….……………………………………….…..15

1.4.3 Methodology and approach of ESIA…………………………….…15

1.4.4 Environmental Mitigation and Enhancement………………………...18

1.4.5 Environmental Monitoring ………………………………………..….19

1.5 Organization of this Report…………………………………………...……..19

2. The Proposed Project…………………………………………………………..21

2.1 Project Location………………………………………………...……………21

2.2 Accessibility & Transportation……………………………………………....22

2.3 Project components………………………………………………………..…23

2.3.1 PV Modules..................................................................................…...24

2.3.2 Mounting System….…………………………………………...…… 24

2.3.3 Inverters……………………………………………………………...26

2.4 Monitoring and Controlling system………………………………………….27

2.5 Civil engineering………………………………………………………….….28

2.6 Area Layout…………………………………………………………….…….29

2.7 Waste consumption and waste generation……………………………….…..29

2.8 Construction and Implementation schedule………………………………….30

2.8.1 Implementation schedule…………………………………………...…31

2.8.2 Plant operation and maintenance………………………...……………32

2.9 Power Transmission Line ………………...………………………………….32

3. Legal and Institutional Framework……………………………………......….35

3.1 Key Mongolian Laws and Policies in the Energy Sector and Key

Governmental Institutions…………………………………………………..35

3.2 Energy Law………………………………………………………………….38

3.3 Renewable Energy Law……………………………………………………..39

3.4 Environmental Policies and Laws Related to the Sector……………………39

3.5 International Requirements……………………………………………...…..41

3.6 Current Legal Status of Sainshand Solar PV Power Plant……………...…...41

Page 3: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

3

4. Environmental and Socioeconomic Baseline Conditions.………....................43

4.1 Climate…………………………………………………………………….43

4.1.1 Temperature…………………………………………………….……43

4.1.2 Precipitation…………………………………………………….……44

4.1.3 Wind………………………………………………………………….45

4.1.4 Air Quality………………………………………………….………..47

4.1.5 Solar irradiation……………………………………………………...48

4.2 Landscape and Geology……………………………………………………..48

4.2.1 Landscape……………………………………………………...………48

4.2.2 Geological structure and stratigraphy of the region……………………49

4.3 Noise……………………………………………………………………...….53

4.4 Soils………………………………………………………………………....55

4.5 Water bodies…………………………………………………………………56

4.6 Biodiversity …………………………………………………………………58

4.6.1 Environment Climate Conditions, Methods and Methodologies.........59

4.6.2 Plant Communities, State of Pasture Condition …….………………60

4.6.3 Summary of Research on Vertebrate Species……………….…………61

4.7 Historic and cultural resources……………………………………………….73

4.8 Social and economic conditions…………………………………………...…73

4.8.1 Population and Demographics…………………………………...……73

4.8.2 Employment……………………………….…………………………...78

4.8.3 Economic Development Level……………………………..…………78

4.8.4 Health Level……………………………………….…………………..80

4.8.5 Land Use…………………….…………………….…………………..80

4.8.6 Social infrastructure Development Level…….……………………..…81

5. The Analysis of Alternatives………………………………….………………..86

5.1 Site selection…………………………………………………………………86

5.2 „With Project‟ VS „Without Project‟ Alternative………………………..…87

5.3 Electricity Sources Alternatives……………………………………………..88

6. Environmental and Social Impacts Assessment and Mitigation measures...90

6.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………….90

6.2 Impact on the climate and air quality and mitigation measures……………...90

6.2.1 Assessment of impacts on the climate and air quality………………....90

6.2.2 Mitigation and elimination of the impacts on climate and air quality…93

6.3Impact on the Geological condition and the mitigation measures…………...94

6.3.1 Impact on the geological condition…………………………………….94

Page 4: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

4

6.3.2 Mitigation of the negative impact on the geological condition..………94

6.4 Impact on the soil layer and the mitigation measures………………………..95

6.4.1 Impact on the soil layer………………………………………………...95

6.4.2 Mitigation and elimination of the negative impact on the soil layer…..96

6.5 Impact on water bodies and mitigation measures …………………………97

6.5.1 Impact on the water reserves, its quality and its assessment……...…97

6.5.2 Mitigation of the impact on the water reserves and its quality……...97

6.6 Impact of noise and mitigation measures………………………………….98

6.7 Impact on visual amenity and mitigation measures………………………98

6.8 Impact on biodiversity and Mitigation measures…………………………..99

6.8.1 Impact on the flora and the mitigation measures…………………..99

6.8.2 Impact on the fauna and the mitigation measures…………………101

6.9 Impact on historical and cultural memorabilia and mitigation measures.…102

6.10 Impact on the society and economy and mitigation measures…………….102

6.10.1 Traffic………………………………………….……………………103

6.10.2 Employment Opportunities………………………………………104

6.10.3 Economy …………...……….…………………………………...….104

6.10.4 Human Health……...……………….…………………………....….105

6.10.5 Occupational and Public Health and safety………….………….….109

6.11 Impacts of Power Transmission Line ………………………………....111

6.11.1Technical Characteristics of the Overhead Line (OHL)……………..111

6.11.2Construction Works for the OHL…………………………………….113

6.11.3 Access to Construction Sites of the OHL ………………………......113

6.11.4 Impacts and mitigation measures on Archaeology and Cultural

Heritage …………………………………………………………....113

6.11.5 Impacts and mitigation measures on Air Quality…………………...113

6.11.6 Noise and Vibration……………………………………………...….114

6.12 Summary of Cumulative Impacts…………………………………………116

7. Environmental and Social Management Plan……………………………..118

7.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….119

7.2 Objectives…………………………………………………………...…….119

7.3 Environmental and Social Management Plan……………………………..119

7.4 Environmental Monitoring Program 2014-2018…………………….……134

References Cited…………………………………………………………….....139

Page 5: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

5

Figures

Figure 1-1: Map of Mongolia with Project Location

Figure 1-2: Overall ESIA process

Figure 1-3: Product Results for Consequence & Likelihood Categories

Figure 2-1: Overview of proposed PV Area

Figure 2-2: Railroad Mongolia-China

Figure 2-3: Route from rail station to PV site

Figure 2-4: System design

Figure 2-5: Sun Orbit Diagram Sainshand

Figure 2-6: Typical sketch for changing table inclinations

Figure 2-7: Conceptual Area Layout

Figure 2-8: Distance of substation - PV site

Figure 2-9: Power Transmission Concept

Figure 2-10: Existing local substation

Figure 4-1: Repetition of the wind speed

Figure 4-2: Map of Mongolia - Dornogovi province

Figure 4-3: On site view in south-west direction

Figure 4-4: On site view in west direction

Figure 4-5: Trial pits

Figure 4-6: Soil profiles

Figure 4-7: Administrative-territorial boundaries of Dornogovi Province

Figure 4-8: Population of Sainshand soum

Figure 4-9: Population and households‟ number shown by bags

Figure 4-10: Family Housing Conditions/census in 2010/

Figure 4-11: Employees by branch, at the end of the year 2013

Figure 4-12: Livestock number by types of animal husbandry

Figure 5-1 Power supply and Demand Mongolia

Tables

Table 1-1: Sainshand PV Power Project milestone

Table 1-2: Overall Environmental Impact Findings

Table 1-3: Consequence Categories and Rankings

Table 1-4: Likelihood Categories and Rankings

Table 1-5: Significance Categories

Table 2-1: Electrical Data at Standard Test Conditions

Table 2-2: Temperature Characteristics

Table 2-3: Inverter DC

Page 6: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

6

Table 2-4: Inverter AC

Table 2-5: Inverter Efficiency

Table 4-1: Average weather data of Sainshand city for 1970-2012

Table 4-2: Temperature and precipitation data for Sainshand city (1961-1990)

Table 4-3: Average wind speed (m/second)

Table 4-4: Highest wind speed (m/second)

Table 4-5: Repetition of the wind speed at the Sainshand Power Plant (%) - 2008-2012

Table 4-6: Average data of the air pollution for the 3rd

of October

Table 4-7: Typical Sound Pressure Levels Associated with Common Noise Sources

Table 4-8: Guideline Values for Community Noise in Specific Environments

Table 4-9: Plant Communities in Project Area

Table 4-10: Prominent species in Project Area

Table 4-11: Species of Amphibia and Reptilia

Table 4-12: Aves

Table 4-13: Mammalia

Table 4-14: Indicators by Bags

Table 4-15: Number of Operating Entities and Organizations by Bags

Table 4-16: Regional Development Outlook of Sainshand Soum

Table 4-17: Information about the infrastructure project near Sainshand

Table 5-1: Energy production capacity of various sites examined

Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact

Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental impacts as a result of the Proposed

Project against the „Without Project‟ Alternative

Table 6-1: Mongolian standard for the air quality in cities and settlements MNS 4585-98

Table 6-2: Air Quality Standard of the World Bank

Table 6-3: Impact on the weather quality and its assessment

Table 6-4: Assessment of the impact on the soil layer

Table 6-5: Assessment of the project impact on the vegetation

Table 6-6: Assessment of the project impact on the fauna of the project area

Table 7-1: Measures to be taken in order to reduce the impact on ambient air

Table7-2: Measures to be taken in order to reduce the impact on soil

Table 7-3: Measures to be taken in order to mitigate the impact on water

Table 7-4: Measures to be taken in order to reduce the physical impact

Table 7-5: Measures to be taken in order to reduce the negative socioeconomic impact

Table 7-6: Measures to be taken in order to reduce the impact on historical and cultural

resources

Table 7-7: Organizational chart of the Management

Table 7-8: Environmental Monitoring Yearly Plan

Page 7: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

7

Appendices

Appendix 1 Conceptual Area Layout

Appendix 2 Time Schedule

Appendix 3 Typical Monitoring System Block Diagram

Appendix 4 Overview Single Line Diagram

Glossary and List of Abbreviations and Acronyms

pv Photovoltaic

LLC Limited Liability Company

GmbH Gesellschaft mit beschraenkter Haftung( in German) means Limited liability

Company

IFC International Financial Corporation

Aimag Province (Mongolian administrative unit)

ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

PPA Power Purchase Agreement

EHS Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines 0C degrees Centigrade

CO2 carbon dioxide

dBA decibels (sound pressure level)

EAP Environmental Action Plan

EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

ESMP Environmental and social Management Plan

ERA Mongolian Energy Regulatory Authority

NDC National Dispatching Center

EU European Union

Ha hectare

Ger Traditional dwelling of Mongolians (also known as yurts)

Km kilometers

Kv kilovolts, or 1,000 volts

kW kilowatts, or 1,000 watts of energy, equal to 1 joule of energy per second

kWh kilowatt hour

LAeq equivalent sound pressure level

mm millimeters

m/s meters per second

MW Megawatt – one million watts of energy

NGO non-governmental organizations

soum Mongolian administrative unit roughly analogous to county

UN United Nations

Page 8: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

8

UNDP United Nations Development Program

v volt, a measure of resistance or potential difference

WHO World Health Organization

BEEP Building Energy Efficiency Project

BCNS Building codes, norms and standards

GEF Global Environment Facility

KEMCO Korean Energy Management Corporation

DC direct current

AC alternating current

LCC Local Control Centre

SO sulfur dioxide

CO carbon monoxide

NO2 nitric oxide

O3 ozone

PM 10 particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter

Page 9: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

9

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT

BACKGROUND

1.1 Introduction

Desert Solar Power One LLC (DSP One LLC), a project company owned by the family

owned United Green Group and the German family office Tucher & Schmied GmbH, is

intending to construct a Photovoltaic (PV) Power Plant in Sainshand in south-eastern

Mongolia (figure 1-1) with a capacity of 30 megawatts (MW). DSP One LLC, as one of

the first project companies for large-scale solar PV development in Mongolia, is seeking

financing from European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). As part of

their decision making process, EBRD requires that the proposed project be evaluated in

an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) that meets international

guidelines. The draft ESIA shall be disclosed to project stakeholders and the public in

compliance with Equator principles (EPs) and EBRD guidelines as best practice. All

stakeholder and public comments on the draft ESIA were considered in developing the

final ESIA, and will be considered in the final decisions made by EBRD.

Figure1-1 Map of Mongolia with Project location

Page 10: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

10

1.2 Project Background

The Government of Mongolia promotes electric power generation from renewable

energies to further increase its domestic total power generation capacity. Today the main

part of energy in Mongolia is produced by coal-fired plants. These plants cause

significant short-term and long-term environmental damages. For example in Ulaanbaatar

the particulate matter pollution during winter is over 20 times as high as valid

international values (Data source: Ministry of Energy Mongolia). Economic growth and a

boom in the mining sector are leading to a higher energy demand for the whole country.

Furthermore, especially during peak demand expensive electricity has to be imported

from Russia.

Therefore, the existing energy generating situation needs to be reinforced with new

climate friendly power plants like PV Power Plants in order to ensure the availability of

energy and to avoid brownouts or blackouts. Mongolia has tremendous renewable energy

resources available, in particular the energy of the sun. Mongolia has very convenient

climatic conditions for effective use of these resources. Due to PV plants Mongolia is

able to reduce the energy import expenses from Russia significantly. This has been the

political target of Mongolian Ministry of Energy, said M. Sonompil on April 29, 2013, to

make Mongolia energy self-sufficient and plans to expand energy production further to

eventually become an energy exporter. As an option to tackle the increasing energy

demand and also to foster a clean energy development, the Government of Mongolia

enacted a “National Renewable Energy Program(2005 – 2020)” and launched the

“Renewable Energy Law” in 2007 with the target to increase the renewable energy share

to 20 – 25 % by 2020 (currently 5%).

On-site investigations were conducted since January 2013 on several sites in Mongolia

and feasibility study for developing PV power plant in Sainshand was prepared in March

2013 based on a more than five-year ongoing research on the solar power yield in

Sainshand. In September 2013 the PV solar power project was approved by Technical &

Science Committee of Ministry of Energy Mongolia, and in February 2014 the

construction license was issued by Mongolian Energy Regulatory Commission. In

September 2014, the Feed-In Tariff has been approved to be 16 USD cents / kWh for 20

Years and both the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) and Dispatch Agreement have

been signed in July 2015. All necessary approvals and licenses have been obtained.

Additional details of the legal framework and project development are provided in

Chapter 3, and the proposed solar PV project is described in Chapter 2.

Please refer to the following table for milestones in regards to this project:

Page 11: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

11

No. Research/approvals/licenses Date

1 Lead study on renewable energy usage

in rural areas (financed by KfW

Bankengruppe)

Dec. 2005

2 Further studies on the Mongolian

renewable energy market

Dec. 2010

3 Memorandum of Understanding with

Ministry of Energy

Dec. 2012

4 On-site investigation (German

geologist and PV specialist) of seven

potential project sites

Jan. 2013

5 Feasibility study for the most suitable

project location

Apr. 2013

6 Project approval by the Technical &

Science Committee of the Ministry of

Energy and grid capacity study

prepared

Sep. 2013

7 Land permission on city level Dec. 2013

8 Construction license Mar. 2014

9 Power Purchase Agreement and

Dispatch Agreement signed

Jul. 2015

10 Construction start Q2 2017

Table1-1 Sainshand PV Power Project milestones

1.3 Scope of the ESIA

In order to successfully development this project, the following requirements must be met:

• The project would meet Mongolian national requirements and international lending

standards.

• The project would include all necessary mitigation measures to minimize any

significant adverse change in environmental, health and safety, and socioeconomic

conditions.

• Appropriate public consultation and disclosure are undertaken in line with EBRD

Performance Standards, ensuring all reasonable public opinions are adequately

considered prior to a commitment for financing.

Page 12: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

12

To ensure compliance with international lending requirements, the overall scope of

this assessment includes:

• Scoping and identification of key issues.

• Definition of baseline conditions of key environmental and social resources.

• Assessment of positive and negative impacts of the proposed project.

• Consultation with people who may be affected by the prospective project and other

stakeholders.

• Development of design and operating practices that are sufficient to avoid, reduce, or

compensate for significant adverse environmental and social impacts.

• Development of such monitoring programs as are necessary to verify mitigation is

effective in accomplishing its goals, and to develop and refine the effectiveness of

mitigation measures.

These requirements are discussed further in the following sections.

1.4 Methodology for the ESIA

Figure 1-2 Overall ESIA process

Scoping – identification of key

Impacts

Consultation

Baseline data collection

Impact Assessment –prediction,

analysis and determination of

significance

Mitigation – avoid, reduce,

compensate, remediate, and

enhance energy

Environmental Management Plan

–feeds into project construction

Production of the EIA Report

Page 13: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

13

This section describes the ESIA process in the context of the Sainshand PV Solar Power

Plant. The overall approach for the ESIA and reporting used the following sources of

guidance:

• European Union Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the Assessment of the effects of

certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive

97/11/EC (Council of the European Union, 1985; 1997).

• IFC Guidelines, including Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines for solar

Energy (IFC, 2007b), General EHS Guidelines (IFC, 2007a), Draft EHS Guidance for

Roads (IFC, 2006), and Operational Policy 4.01, Content of an Environmental

Assessment Report for a Category B Project (World Bank, 2007).

1.4.1 Scoping

The aim of the scoping process is to identify the potentially significant environmental and

socioeconomic issues that are associated with a project, covering the full range of

possible effects, both beneficial and adverse, and to ensure that potentially significant

issues are considered fully in the ESIA. The method used for scoping the potentially

significant impacts of this project comprised:

• Consultation with and feedback from government and private organizations and

members of the public.

• Professional knowledge of PV Solar Power Plant development and operation, and the

types of impacts this could cause.

• Preliminary knowledge of the existing environment and areas of sensitivity.

• The scoping process identified the following key issues to be assessed within the ESIA:

- Environmental benefits of using solar-generated energy to meet Mongolia‟s demand for

electricity as opposed to other methods, particularly coal.

- The vulnerability of local soils, in particular their susceptibility to erosion and

desertification.

- Potential effects on local communities, including visual and cultural effects.

- Potential effects on water from the generation and management of waste.

- Potential economic effects from employment during construction and operation.

The environmental and social impact assessment Chapter 6 of this ESIA determines

whether or not a potential impact of the proposed scheme could be considered

“significant.” An identification and assessment of environmental, socio-economic and

health & safety issues potentially arising from the project have been undertaken, and

mitigation measures were proposed aiming to reduce the potential impacts that may result

from the project. Details of impact assessment and impact significance as well as

Page 14: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

14

mitigation measures are provided in chapter 6 of this ESIA. In addition, an

Environmental and Social Management Plan (chapter7) have been developed to ensure

that potential impacts are sufficiently monitored and mitigation measures are

implemented.

The ESIA activities have been carried out jointly by a multi-disciplinary team of experts,

including environment team, and from relevant fields in house. A brief summary of the

key potential impacts and their corresponding mitigation measures and monitoring

requirements are presented in the Tables below.

Environmental

Parameter

Level of

Impact Reasons Mitigation Measures

Air Impact Low No atmospheric Emissions

from the process.

Use of PV based solar power

technology

Water Low

1. Plant will require a very

low amount of water.

2.No effluent is envisaged

to be discharged from the

plant that may have

impact.

1. In the case of wet cleaning,

the amount of water needed is

insignificant. There would be

no need of water if DSP One

LLC manages to successfully

implement dry cleaning of

Modules.

2. Drinking water requirement

shall be met from the water

reservoir of Sainshand city.

Land Medium

Impact of change in land

use

1.Site selection has been made

in consideration of avoidance

of sensitive habitats and

species and without conflicts

with other land holders

Noise Low

1.No Sources of Noise

within the project area.

2. No sensitive receptors

in the vicinity of the

project site.

1. Noise barriers will be

provided to neutralize the

noise.

2. Noise level of machines

shall be below 60- 80 dB (A)

Flora and Fauna Low

1. The site area is partially

covered with small grass

parts however an arid

sandy area in general.

2. Animal species that

lives in such open flat

terrain are not threatened

or restricted on their

1.Although there is no

significant vegetation cover

within the study area,

plantation activities will be

carried out.

2. Holes will be left in the

surrounding fence of the solar

plant so small animals are able

Page 15: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

15

environment. to pass through.

Socioeconomic Low

1. The land identified for

the project belongs to

Mongolian Government

and the PV site is marked

and reserved at the related

authority in Sainshand. So

there are no conflicts with

other landholders.

2. Influx of Labors

1. No resettlement involved as

there were no residents within

the project area.

2. Construction labors will be

housed on temporary

construction camps specially

developed for this purpose

with all basic amenities.

Table 1-2 Overall Environmental Impact Findings

1.4.2 Baseline Data Collection

(The study area was defined initially by the proposed locations of solar panels, and then

by the area that could be affected by construction and operation of the solar panels.)

Baseline data collection for the PV Solar Power Plant included a combination of desk

studies and site visits. Desk studies used existing sources of information, including data

available on the internet, reports, and data provided by the project proponent, DSP One

LLC. Site visits were undertaken in January 2013, in order to supplement and verify

information provided by desk studies.

Chapter 4 of this ESIA provides information on the baseline environment, including

natural processes that may affect the baseline over the course of project development.

1.4.3 Methodology and Approach of ESIA

Once all of the project environmental and socioeconomic impacts have been assessed, the

significance of the impacts was ranked by considering the following elements:

The consequence of identified events: the resulting effect (positive or negative) of an

activity‟s interaction with legal, natural and/or socioeconomic environments; and

Likelihood: the likelihood that an activity will occur. Agreed criteria were defined

for each level of consequence and each level of likelihood and the significance of the

impact associated with each identified aspect is the product of the consequence and

likelihood. It should be noted that the assessment has been conducted by considering

the mitigation measures normally designed into / included in the project.

The following sections briefly describe the consequence, likelihood, and significance

criteria.

Page 16: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

16

1.4.3.1 Consequence

To assign a level of consequence to each environmental and social impact, criteria are

defined for environmental and socio-economic consequence or severity. Legal issues are

embedded in both criteria sets. The consequence categories and their ranking are

presented in the following Table.

Consequence Ranking Description

Catastrophic

5 Massive effect – Persistent severe environmental damage or

severe nuisance extending over a large area. In terms of

commercial or recreational use or nature conservation, a major

economic loss for the Company. Constant, high exceedance of

statutory or prescribed limits, high profile community outrage.

severe

4 Major effect – Severe environmental damage. The Company is

required to take extensive measures to restore polluted or

damaged environment to its original state. Extended breaches

of statutory or prescribed limits, and serious community

concern and complaints.

Critical

3 Localized effect – Limited discharges of known toxicity,

considerable community concern and/or complaints. Repeated

breaches of statuary or prescribed limit. Affecting

neighborhood. Spontaneous recovery of limited damage within

one year.

Marginal

2 Minor effect – Contamination. Damage sufficiently large to

damage the environment, some community concern raised.

Single exceedance of statutory or prescribed criterion. No

permanent effect on the environment.

None 1 Slight effect – Local environmental damage. Within the fence

and within systems. Negligible financial severity.

None 0 No impact

Positive + Beneficial impact – enhances the environment

Table 1-3: Consequence Categories and Rankings

It should be noted that it is often difficult to compare impacts consistently across different

natural and socio-economic environments. When evaluating the environmental and

socioeconomic aspects, emphasis was placed on specific cause and effect relationships.

Scientific evidence as well as predictions based on observation of previous similar

activities can and have been used in the impact assessment process. Where it has not been

possible to fully quantify the effect that an activity may have on the environment or a

component of the environment, or where there is a lack of scientific knowledge,

qualitative judgment has been used. Such judgments is based on a full understanding of

Page 17: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

17

the project activities, and the team‟s knowledge of the environment, social structure and

general health aspects of the region in which the project‟s activities will occur.

1.4.3.2. Likelihood

To assign likelihood to each activity, five categories are defined and ranked. The criteria

for likelihood are shown below.

Category Ranking Definition

Certain 5 The activity will occur under normal operating

conditions

Very Likely 4 The activity is very likely to occur under normal

operational conditions

Likely 3

The activity is likely to occur at some time under

normal operating

conditions

Unlikely 2 The activity is unlikely to but may occur at some

time under normal operating conditions

Very Unlikely 1

The activity is very unlikely to occur under normal

operating conditions but may occur in exceptional

circumstances

Table 1-4 Likelihood Categories and Rankings

1.4.3.3. Significance

The significance of the impact is expressed as the product of the consequence and

likelihood of occurrence of the activity, expressed as follows:

Significance = Consequence x Likelihood

Figure below illustrates all possible product results for the five consequence and

likelihood categories.

Page 18: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

18

Figure1-3Product Results for Consequence & Likelihood Categories

Based on its consequence-likelihood score, each environmental aspect has been ranked

into five categories by order of significance as illustrated below.

Ranking

(Consequence X Likelihood) Significance

>16 Extremely dangerous

10-16 High

6-9 Medium

2-5 Low

<2 Very low or Negligible

Table1-5: Significance Categories

1.4.4 Environmental Mitigation and Enhancement

Where significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures were developed. These

measures are intended to avoid, reduce, compensate, and/or remediate adverse impacts,

or to enhance potentially beneficial impacts. Wherever possible, this is undertaken as part

of the project design, so the measures will feed back into impact assessment.

The mitigation and enhancement which should be undertaken as part of the project are set

out as an Environmental and Social Management Plan, which can then be applied in

order to manage different phases of the project. For this project, the Environmental and

Social Management Plan is presented as Chapter 7.

Page 19: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

19

1.4.5 Environmental Monitoring

Where there is uncertainty over the potential significance of an impact, mitigation may

include monitoring of that impact to determine whether additional measures are required.

Sainshand Environmental monitoring is described in Chapter 7. Furthermore,a

Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) has been developed separately to identify and

address all stakeholder concerns and a Non-technical Summary (NTS) has also been

included in a separate document.

1.5 Organization of this Report

The report consists of seven chapters (including the present chapter) and the contents of

the remaining chapters are briefly described in this section.

•Chapter 2 The Proposed Project.

This chapter provides information related to various feature of the proposed power plant

including power generation process, utilities, water and power requirement and other

proposed infrastructure facilities. It also provides the glimpse of project schedule for

approval and implementation.

•Chapter 3 Legal and institutional Framework.

This chapter describes the legal and institutional framework and context in which the

project is being proposed and developed.

• Chapter 4 Environmental and Socioeconomic Baseline Conditions.

This chapter describes the environmental setting of the solar power plant area and the

baseline environmental and socioeconomic conditions of aspects of the area.

• Chapter 5 Analysis of Alternatives.

Alternatives considered for the proposed project are evaluated and discussed with

particular emphasis on environmental considerations.

•Chapter 6 Anticipated Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures.

This chapter provides details of the environmental and social impact assessment of the

project during construction, operational and decommissioning phases. It expresses the

impacts of the proposed project on the various components of environment. Mitigation

measures are suggested along with the impact prediction.

•Chapter 7 Environmental & Social Management Plan.

Page 20: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

20

This chapter deals with Environmental and Social management plan incorporating

recommendations to implementation of the suggested mitigation measures to minimize

adverse environmental and social impacts during construction, operation and

decommissioning phases.

Page 21: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

21

CHAPTER 2 THE PROPOSED PROJECT

DSP One LLC proposes to construct and operate a PV Solar Power Plant in south-eastern

Mongolia to generate up to 30 MW of electricity for the national grid. In 2014, the

project land of 714,000 sqm has been approved by the city council of Sainshand. This

chapter describes the project in sufficient detail to allow an evaluation of the potential

environmental and social impacts that could result from project construction and

operation, and to allow development of appropriate mitigation measures to control,

reduce, or compensate for such impacts where necessary. DSP One LLC is in the process

of developing detailed designs for the project, and some specifications of the final project

could be somewhat different than described here. However, differences are expected to

be relatively minor and should not result in increased impacts.

2.1 Project location

The location for the proposed PV Power Plant is sketched in Figure 2-1. The area lies in

south-eastern Mongolia situated next to the Sainshand city in Dornogovi Province.

Around 80ha of unused land which is owned by the city of Sainshand is explored for its

aptitude for PV power generation. A general overview of the proposed PV area is

presented in Figure 2-1.

Figure2-1 Overview of proposed PV Area

Page 22: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

22

2.2 Accessibility & Transportation

Mongolia has an emerging infrastructure. For the accessibility of Mongolia from abroad,

which is required to transport equipment like inverters and modules, the railroad can be

used. The fact, that there is a railroad connecting Mongolia with China (refer to Figure2-

2), offers an ideal opportunity to transport all relevant components of a PV Power Plant.

The proposed location is very close to the rail station of Sainshand (refer to Figure 2-3).

Figure 2-2 Railroad Mongolia-China

After reaching the rail station the equipment shall be loaded onto trucks, respectively

heavy-duty trucks. Generally the accessibility to the specific site must be guaranteed for

the heaviest equipment. For photovoltaic installations such equipment is normally the

transformer. This transformer requires a crane for uploading on the site. The modules will

be transported in containers, whereby approximately 270 20-feet containers for 30 MW

photovoltaic modules will be required. The logistical efforts shall be planned sufficiently.

Transformers with a weight up to 30 tons shall be considered and at both locations (rail

station and onsite) a suitable crane shall be available for unloading the cargo from trucks

and train. The route of the trucks from the rail station to the site is shown in Figure 2-5.

The distance between both locations is approximately 8.5 km only. All related existing

roads are in adequate conditions.

Page 23: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

23

Figure 2-3: Route from rail station to PV site

2.3 Project components

The PV project contains three major components, which are PV modules, Mounting

system and Invertors. The detailed description of the main components is in the following

sub-sections:

2.3.1 PV modules

The PV modules are the main component of a PV Power Plant. The modules must with-

stand all environmental influences over the whole life time of the plant. The predefined

module manufacturer is Canadian Solar, and the module type is CS6P - 250P. One

module consists of 60 cells of polycrystalline technology. Each cell has a size of 15.6 cm

x 15.6 cm. The modules are certified according to IEC 61215 and IEC 61730. The

maximum allowed DC voltage is 1,000 V. The main module data is shown in the

following tables.

Electrical Data at Standard Test Conditions (STC)

Optimum Operating Voltage 30.1 V

Optimum Operating Current 8.30 A

Page 24: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

24

Open Circuit Voltage 37.2 V

Short Circuit Current 8.87 A

Nominal Maximum Power 250 W

Module Efficiency 15.54%

Power Tolerance -0 W to +5 W

Table 2-1: Electrical Data at Standard Test Conditions

Temperature Characteristics

Nominal Operating Cell Temperature 45°C

Temperature Coefficient Power -0.43%/°C

Temperature Coefficient Voltage -0.34%/°C

Temperature Coefficient Current +0.065%/°C

Table 2-2: Temperature Characteristics

2.3.2 Mounting system

The designed system is presented in Figure 2-4. The modules are mounted with a tilt

angle of 35° (α) according to the horizontal. The orientation is 0°, meaning the modules

face in south direction. The row distance (between two tables) is 6.00 m, which is

presented as (b). The modules lower edge is 0.80 m above ground and the upper edge (h)

reaches a height of 2.685 m. The length of the module table is 3.286 m (a) including

frames.

Page 25: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

25

Figure 2-4: System design

Figure2-5shows the Sun Orbit Diagram for the location of the PV Power Plant.

Figure 2-5: Sun Orbit Diagram Sainshand

α β

b

a

h

Page 26: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

26

2.3.3 Inverters

The inverters transform the DC current of the PV modules into AC current in order to

feed the electrical power into the public grid. The development of the power electronics

in the last decade allowed to reach very high level of DC/AC conversion and can reach

up to 98% (depending on the inverter type and manufacturer).The selected inverter with a

capacity of 630 kW is from the manufacturer SMA and the specific type is Sunny Central

630CP. The following tables present the key data for the predefined inverter.

Input (DC)

Type Sunny Central 630CP

Maximum PV Power 713 kW

Input Voltage Range MPPT 500 to 820 V

Maximum Input Voltage 1,000 V

Maximum Input Current 1,350 A

Table 2-3: Inverter DC

Output (AC)

Type Sunny Central 630CP

Nominal Output Power 630 kVA

Nominal Output Voltage 315 V

Nominal Output Current 1,155 A

Table 2-4: Inverter AC

Efficiency

Type Sunny Central 630CP

Maximum Efficiency 98.7 %

Euro-eta 98.5 %

Table 2-5: Inverter Efficiency

Page 27: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

27

2.4 Monitoring and controlling system

The photovoltaic PV Power Plant in Sainshand shall be provided with a Local Control

Centre (LCC) with monitoring functions located in the monitoring respectively

equipment room in the Control & Security Building. The Local Control Centre will be

permanently staffed. For maintenance and repair activities additional staff will be present

in the LCC.

Parameters to be monitored:

Data from inverters and string monitors

Logging of events and released commands

Weather station data

Module temperature

Fiscal meter

Power network analyzer (to monitor high and low voltage conditions and

interruption)

The complete list of monitored data will be defined in the specification of the Monitoring

system in a later stage of the project. A compilation of collected data shall be made

available at least daily at the respective LCC. If possible more frequent updates are

preferred.

All monitored data shall be archived for the whole lifespan of the PV Power Plant and

shall be made available for analysis on a central archive in the respective LCC. Any

alarms or non-normal operational conditions identified in the equipment shall be dis-

played in the respective monitoring system immediately. The performance data of the PV

plant shall be updated in a secured web server mini-mum once per day. In order to load

the data to the web server (PV PORTAL) a connection to the public telecommunication

network (internet) by modem, GSM, UMTS, ADSL, etc. is necessary. For a schematic

overview of the monitoring system please refer to Appendix 3.

2.5 Civil Engineering

The civil engineering is defining the required constructions such as buildings and roads

for the proposed PV Power Plant Sainshand. As main construction requirements due the

photovoltaic Power Plant all buildings, fences and roads will present by the specific plant

layout.

The following listed constructions must be realized to ensure a complete photovoltaic

system.

Page 28: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

28

Buildings (Transformer Buildings, Field Substation, Monitoring and Security

Building,Gatehouse)

Roads

Gravel roads are foreseen. The width of main and branch roads shall be 3.0 m. All

roads shall be designed for vehicles of the constructor staff and with a low

frequency for vehicles for delivering of the heavy transformer (only during

construction phase). The roads should have turning round areas for trucks.

Drainage

Based on the slightly steady inclined surface to north-west and due to the low

precipitation rate a drainage system against rain water and flooding is not

necessary.

Water Supply, Sewage

If existing wells cannot be used a new well will be drilled or the water will be

delivered by trucks. Enough water shall be provided for the staff located on site.

An adequate waste water sewerage system shall be constructed where sanitary

installations are foreseen.

Mounting System including foundations.

For the PV Power Plant a fixed mounting structure is foreseen. Using standardized

structures from renowned manufacturers (e.g. Schletter, Krinner, Habdank, etc.)

assures a short construction time and a reliable PV module integration. In general a

distance of 10 cm between two tables has been considered. The mounting structure

shall be designed with a minimum elevation of 80 cm (Figure 2-6). This typical

distance is used to reduce the frequency of required landscaping.

Figure 2-6: Typical sketch for changing table inclinations (*)

(*) Shown figure is used for illustrative purposes and do not reflect site conditions.

Fences: A double-rod fence and gates with bard wire and concrete foundation will

be mounted around the PV plant as border with a minimum distance of 5m to the

mounting structure.

Page 29: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

29

Provide temporary load and unload facility at rail station and on site.

2.6 Area Layout

The Area Layout presents the Power Plant with a total capacity of 30 MW. The following

Figure is presenting the Conceptual Area Layout as preview of the large scale drawing of

Appendix 1.

Figure 2-7: Conceptual Area Layout

2.7. Water Consumption and wastewater Generation

The project is expected to use limited quantities of fresh water during the three project

phase-construction, operation, and decommissioning, since such this type of projects

considered as a low water consumption projects, the project will be supplied by the water

through Sainshand city water reservoir.

Wastewater is any water that is contaminated by anthropogenic / industrial processes with

solids, temperature, chemicals and other impurities. The effluent management scheme

would essentially involve collection, treatment and recirculation / disposal of various

Page 30: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

30

effluents. Since, water is used only for the cleaning purpose of solar PV modules to

remove dust from it. The discharge water does not include any chemical or hazardous

material. Water runoff / discharge from the panels is likely to get evaporate or absorbed

into the arid ground below the panels, and no drainage canal is required. As for the

wastewater from the trailers where the construction workers will be accommodated, it

shall be collected and regularly transported offsite for appropriate treatment and disposal.

Wastes will be collected and separated for appropriate disposal too. There may be a

security building with a kitchen or lavatory on site. If so, all kitchen and lavatory wastes

will be either transported offsite for appropriate treatment or else a fit-for -purpose water

treatment plant will be built.

2.8. Construction and Implementation Schedule

The proposed time schedule of the following project phases of the 30 MW PV Power

Plant is shown in Appendix 2.The time schedule includes the following phases:

2.8.1 Implementation schedule

I. Finance and PPA phase: (approx. 14 months)

1. Conversation with banks (approx. 5 months)

First talk to banks (EBRD, IFC, DEG, FMO)

Detailed talks and meeting with banks

Negotiation term-sheet

Advisor selection regarding legal / tax / insurance / due

diligence

2. Financial approval process with banks, including negotiation of PPA

(approx. 4 months)

3. Due diligence process (approx. 3 months)

4. Working on pre- and subsequent conditions, including obtaining of

local permits (approx. 3 months)

5. EPC Contracting (approx. 2 months)

EPC Contract negotiations

EPC bankability check

Page 31: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

31

Contract award

II. EPC construction phase: (approx. 6 months)

1. Engineering and procurement phase (approx. 3 months)

Construction engineering

Procurement

Technical design approval

2. Construction phase (approx. 3months)

Mobilization / start of construction

Earth works

Foundations, buildings, roads, fencing

Mounting structure

PV Module mounting

Electrical installations

Demobilisation

3. Commissioning and acceptance phase: (approx. 2 months)

Commissioning

Acceptance tests

Authority acceptance

Plant acceptance

Final documentation

Plant start-up

2.8.2 Plant Operation and Maintenance

The operation of solar power plant is relatively simple and restricted to daylight hours.

With automated functions of inverter and switchyard controllers, the maintenance will be

mostly oriented towards better upkeep and monitoring of overall performance of the

Page 32: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

32

system. The solar PV system requires the least maintenance among all power generation

facility due to the absence of fuel, intense heat, rotating machinery, waste disposal, etc.

However, keeping the PV panels in good condition, monitoring and correcting faults in

the connected equipment and cabling are still required to get maximum energy from the

plant.

2.9 Power Transmission Line

The photovoltaic Power Plant shall feed the generated energy into the public grid. The

suitable voltage level is once indicated by the maximum installed photovoltaic power as

well as by influences of the public grid onto the photovoltaic Power Plant such as

frequency of switching on the grid connection.

The next suitable possibility to connect the PV plant to the local grid is a

110kV/35kV/10kV substation located in the east of Sainshand. The distance to the pro-

posed PV area is approximately 2.75km (refer to Figure 2-8).

Figure 2-8: Distance of substation to PV site

The PV Power Plant shall be connected via a 35 kV overhead line. Such recommendation

is based on the installed PV power of 30 MW. The interconnection point will be at the

35kV switchgear located in the local substation of Sainshand (if enough space is

Page 33: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

33

available on the busbar). Based on the location of the local substation, the connection

point on site (field substation) will be in the southern corner of the proposed site. The

field substation consists of one 35kV switchgear including an outgoing circuit breaker for

35 kV. The incoming voltage level to the field substation onsite will be 35 kV as well. 24

x 1.25 MVA Transformers distributed onsite transforms already the produced energy

from the PV plant up to a voltage level of 35 kV. The medium voltage part of the existing

local substation of Sainshand shall be extended with a new incomer including and cubicle

metering. The borderline between PV Power Plant Operator and Grid Operator is

proposed to be the incoming medium voltage over-headline from the local substation

Sainshand to the field substation on PV site. The proposed borderline is although shown

in Appendix 4.

Figure2-9: Power Transmission Concept

Page 34: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

34

Figure2-10: Existing local substation

Page 35: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

35

CHAPTER 3 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL

FRAMEWORK

This Chapter outlines Mongolian legislative environment for the project implementation

and particularly describes overall local and internationally accepted legal framework for

the renewable energy generation which was adopted in Mongolia.

3.1 Key Mongolian Laws and Policies in the Energy Sector and Key Governmental

Institutions

At present the following laws, regulations and legal documents relate to the energy

regulation process in Mongolia. Specific characteristics of certain laws will be discussed

below in the relevant section.

Laws of Mongolia:

1. Energy Law;

2. Economic Activity License Law;

3. Civil Code;

4. Minerals Law;

5. Renewable Energy Law;

6. Competition Law;

7. Environmental Protection Law;

8. Foreign Investment Law.

* The Parliament in Mongolia is also on the verge of approving the Energy Conservation Law in 2015.

In addition there is a regulatory framework governing the unbundled power sector. In

broad terms the responsibility for licensing is vested with the Ministry of Energy, and for

price regulation with the Energy Regulatory Commission.

Besides, Mongolian Government promulgated various environmental policies in the

energy sector and the following are the major documents that form the base for the

legislative development:

1. National Program of Renewable Energy 2005-2020;

2. Mongolian Integrated Power System Program 2007-2040;

3. Building Energy Efficiency Project (BEEP) started 2009

4. Mongolian Energy Sector Master Plan 2000-2020

Page 36: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

36

1. On 9 June 2005, the Parliament of Mongolia approved “A National Renewable

Energy Program” for the period 2005-2020, to facilitate the wider use of renewable

energy in Mongolia. The Program‟s goals include: a total installed capacity generated

by renewable energy power sources of 3-5% by 2010 and 20-25% by 2020 of the

total energy production; and a program for increased decentralized electrification of

remote rural villages to provide electricity to 100,000 households by 2010 and all

rural families by 2020.

In Mongolia utilization of renewable energy has been emphasized as one of the

priority areas of the energy industry in the Government policy documents (some

major ones are mentioned herein) such as the Government Action Plan (Master Plan),

millennium Development Goals, Sustainable Development Program of Mongolia for

21st century, and Regional Development Concept etc.). The Government of Mongolia

attaches great importance to the use of renewable energy for improving power supply

through research and use of environmentally friendly and new sources of energy for

the benefit of rural households who are not fully provided with power and soums and

settlements that would require significant amount of resources to get connected to

centralized power grids.

2. The Government has adopted Mongolian Integrated Power System Program policy to

ensure the reliable power throughout the country and its capital city and will develop

new generation capacity to meet increasing demand. 2007 Program on integrated

power energy system was adopted by the Parliament with the following objectives:

To create independent and reliable power system with efficient energy generation

facilities with as less as possible loss;

To secure power supply reliability in regions by constructing hydro power plants and

high voltage transmission lines to connect the plants;

To restructure energy sources and make power supply in urban and settled areas by

introducing new and efficient technology and equipment and utilizing renewable

energy sources;

To develop laws and legal basis and management principals applicable in the market

economy principals and increase participation of private sector in the energy sector.

3. The “Building Energy Efficiency Project” (BEEP) started in 2009 to support the

Government of Mongolia in enhancing energy efficiency in the wider Mongolian

building sector by removing the barriers, including noncompliant and outdated

building codes, norms and standards (BCNS). The project is funded by the Global

Environment Facility (GEF), the Korean Energy Management Corporation (KEMCO)

Page 37: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

37

and UNDP Mongolia. Its goal is the reduction in the annual growth rate of GHG

emissions from the buildings sector. BEEP will contribute to the reduction of

greenhouse gas emissions through the transformation of the Mongolian buildings

market towards more energy-efficient building technologies and services, sustainable

private house insulation and energy efficiency financing mechanisms.

4. The Energy Sector Master Plan for Mongolia (2000–2020) was prepared under two

Asian Development Bank‟s supported projects in 1994 and 1999, respectively.

During later energy sector assessment many discrepancies were noted in the power

demand forecast for the period 2000-2010, where the actual demand grew much

faster than what was projected earlier. In addition, the Government of Mongolia has

announced some specific plans and targets to this effect: (i) to attain 20% – 25%

renewable energy in the mix; (ii) to promote energy efficiency; and (iii) to realize

cross-border power supply to neighboring countries to enhance revenues through

power export. In view of these developments, there was an urgent need to

comprehensively analyze, refine and update the existing energy sector master plan for

the 2010–2020 period. The project “Updating Energy Sector Development Plan in

Mongolia” was divided into six sections as follows:

Section 1. Master Plan Assumptions / Strategic Objectives

Section 2. Macroeconomic Outlook

Section 3. Electricity Load Forecasts

Section 4. Aimag Heating Systems

Section 5. Primary and Secondary Energy Resources

Section 6. Generation and Transmission Expansion

The aims of the Strategy include: sustainable development of the energy sector,

reduced poverty and increased involvement of the private sector and public interest in

the sector through a more secure energy supply. Moreover, Mongolia‟s energy sector

should be developed within the regional energy context, while the same time taking

advantage of new technologies and sources of energy that might further promote

economic efficiency and environmental sustainability.

Key Policy Making Government Institutions and bodies

The key institutions involved in policymaking, managing and operating the energy

sector according to the Energy Law as of 2001 are:

State Ikh Khural (Mongolian Parliament) which formulates state policy on energy;

Page 38: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

38

Ministry of Energy which is in charge of the development of policy, including the

development of energy resources, energy use, import and export of energy,

construction of power plants, transmission lines, energy conservation, use of

renewable resources, regulation and international cooperation. It plays a key role

in shaping a green development strategy to suit Mongolia.

Energy Regulatory Commission which is in charge of issuing licenses, approving

tariffs and protecting the rights of consumers and licensees;

The National Dispatching Center which is responsible for coordinating daily

system operation of all power and heat sector entities including real time

coordination of power plant operation, transmission and distribution switching

operation, and operation of the heat transmission network in coordination with

combined heat and power operation. The NDC is also responsible for providing

the information necessary for settlement of spot market transactions within the

context of the wholesale electric power market.

3.2 Energy Law

Primary statute to regulate energy generation, transmission, distribution, consumption

and dispatching activities in the country is the Energy Law, passed in February 2001,

with all subsequent amendments thereto.

Energy Law provides for the legal framework for the energy sector restructuring from

being centrally planned to market-based. This law introduced the independent energy

regulator, the Energy Regulatory Authority, and vested powers and responsibilities to key

institutions involved in managing and operating the energy sector. With the 2001

establishment of the Energy Regulatory Authority (Energy Regulatory Committee since

2012), energy regulation has been in place for over a decade. Energy Law aimed to create

competition and increase private participation and investment.

Energy Law provides for method of price creation. Hence, Energy Law fixes the power

of the Energy Regulatory Commission to develop methodology of tariff determination,

definition of the tariff structure and review, approval, inspection and publishing tariffs.

Tariffs are discussed at the Board meeting and final decisions are issued in the form of

resolutions. By setting tariffs, the Energy Regulatory Commission aims to ensure the

financial viability and sustainable operations of the licensees, while balancing their

interest with those of the consumers.

Page 39: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

39

3.3 Renewable Energy Law

A Renewable Energy Law was adopted in 2007. This law sets forth feed-in tariff ranges

for renewable energy, categorized by type. Pursuant to the framework established by the

Renewable Energy Law, Energy Regulatory Commission developed and approved long

term Power Purchase Agreement signed between the “Central Regional Electricity

Transmission Network” State Owned Stock Company and private investor “Desert Solar

Power One LLC”. Approval of this agreement was in line with the green and

environmental policies.

According to the Renewable Energy Law the State Ikh Khural is the competent body for

policy development in the renewable energy sector and for ownership transfer of state

funded independent renewable energy power sources. The Cabinet is responsible for the

implementation of the Renewable Energy Law and for the approval of a list of soums to

be supplied with electricity and heat generated by the renewable energy power source.

The Ministry of Energy is the main government body in charge for the development of

implementing regulations under the Renewable Energy Law.

The main provisions of the law are as follows:

Energy Regulatory Commission shall issue licenses for construction of Renewable

energy sources and for generation and transmission of renewable energy;

The transmission licensee shall purchase the electricity supplied by a generator at

tariffs approved by the law;

Power Purchase Agreement between generator and a transmission licensee shall be

developed in compliance with the a model agreement approved by the Energy

Regulatory Commission and shall specify capacity of electricity generated and

delivered, its quality, amount, tariff, location of commercial meters, payment and

settlement conditions, duties of the parties and provisions for termination.

3.4 Environmental Policies and Laws Related to the Sector

Since 1992 the Parliament of Mongolia has passed several laws designated for the

protection of environment. Also, the State Policy on the Environment 1997 has been

formulated and constitutes the legal basis for the protection of environment and natural

resources. In 1995 the Mongolian Environmental Action Plan was presented. The

Mongolian Action Program for the 21st Century, the National Action Plan to combat

desertification, the national biodiversity action plan, the action program to protect air, the

Page 40: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

40

national action program to protect ozone layer were developed. The Mongolian Action

Program for the 21st Century includes specific considerations and recommendations

concerning the adaptation to the climate change and mitigation of GHGs emissions. The

Law on Air and Law on Environmental Protection are the main instruments for protection

of air and environment of the country.

Among other laws governing the environmental protection are:

Environmental Impact Assessment Law

Special Protected Areas Law

Land Law

Law on Fauna

Water Law

Subsoil Law

Forest Law

Household and Industrial Waste

Environmental Protection Law aims to protect the land and soil, underground resources

and mineral wealth, water, plants, animals, and air from any adverse effects in order to

prevent ecological imbalance. 2012 amendments introduced the “polluter pays” principle

and collective management of the natural resources. Polluters are liable to pay

compensation for damage caused to the environment and natural resources. The amount

of compensation payable depends on the particular resource. Natural resources in

Mongolia are all to be assessed by private environmental assessors based on procedures

which are currently being formulated by the Government. After the assessment each type

of resources is to be assigned an intrinsic value.

Besides there is a requirement on any organization whose activities involve the use of

natural resources at their own cost, to commission an environmental assessor to conduct

an environmental audit every two years, and to implement the recommendations

proposed in the audit.

Environmental Impact Assessment Law. According to the Law a person proposing a

project which will have an impact on the environment must inform and report on the

implementation of environment management plans to the local population, local

government and other stakeholders within the deadline specified by the related ministry.

Water Law as of 2004 has been revised and replaced by the revised Water Law 2012. The

Law of Fees for Use of Water and Minerals Water has been consolidated with other laws

on the use of natural resources and is replaced with the Law on Natural Resources Use

Fee 2012.

Page 41: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

41

3.5 International Requirements

Mongolia has signed several of international conventions which are relevant to the

project.

The country ratified the United Nations Framework Conventions of Climate Change in

1996. Mongolian also announced its association with actions of the Copenhagen Accord

in January 2010. Major mitigation actions include energy efficiency and renewable

energy.

Mongolia has accepted the Kyoto Protocol on 15 December 1999. Special National

Bureau was established and registered with the Secretariat of United Nations Framework

Convention on Climate Change.

In addition there are Convention to Combat Desertification 1996, Convention

Biodiversity 1993 and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of

Fauna and Flora 1996.

Guidelines and policies of the international institutional lenders such as EBRD and IFC

can also be applicable. Those policies are designed to promote sustainable development

and contain environmental and social impact criteria for a financing approval process.

3.6 Current Legal Status of Sainshand Solar PV Power Plant Project

Currently Desert Solar Power One LLC obtained the following approvals necessary for

the project implementation:

1. Feasibility Study Approval by the Science and Technology Committee at the Ministry

of Energy;

2. Grid Capacity Study conducted by the National Dispatching Center (from 2014 and

2015);

3. General Environmental Impact Assessment approved by the Ministry of Environment

and Urban Development;

4. Environmental protection action plan approved by the Ministry of Environment and

Urban Development;

5. Electricity Tariff (Feed-in-Tariff) approved by the Energy Regulatory Commission

according to the Law of Mongolia on Renewable Energy; and

6. Construction License for constructing the Solar PV Power Plant granted by Energy

Regulatory Commission.

Page 42: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

42

Desert Solar Power One LLC entered into the Power Purchase Agreement with the

Central Region Electricity Transmission Company (“PPA”). Also Dispatching

Agreement with the National Dispatching Center has been signed shortly after the PPA.

During the course of the project construction Desert Solar Power One LLC will obtain:

1. Technical Conditions for construction of Interconnection Line and all permits

associated with the Interconnection Line;

2. Full Land Use Rights in respect of the land necessary for the Solar PV Power Plant

and Interconnection Line;

3. Electric Power Generation License issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission;

4. State Commission Act in respect of the Solar PV Power Plant and the Interconnection

Line;

5. Immovable Property Certificate issued by the State Registration Office for all

facilities relating to the Solar PV Power Plant and the Interconnection Line;

6. And other civil engineering permits required for the project construction.

In conclusion, considering the above described legal framework Solar PV Power Plant

Project of Desert Solar Power One accords with the promulgated green policies and

brings desired technological know-how to the country.

Page 43: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

43

CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC

BASELINE CONDITIONS

To characterize baseline environmental and socioeconomic conditions, information was

acquired through desk studies and was supplemented with field surveys and observations.

4.1 Climate

The climate of the region is an intercontinental climate with a broad temperature range

between winter and summer. This region has cold winters and hot summers and most of

its rains fall during the summer. It is generally a region of high atmospheric pressure.

4.1.1 Temperature

The temperature changes radically throughout the year. Coldest temperatures of the year

are measured in December, January and February. The average temperature is determined

between -13.7 °C and -18.1 ° C, sometimes reaches -30 °C and -33 ° C, but from time to

time it can reach - 36° C and - 40 ° C.The cold season of the year starts from the 20th of

September and lasts until the mid-May of the next year. The warm season of the year

starts accordingly in May. The air temperature can reach +20°С, but sometimes +30°С

and higher. Total number of such warmer days in a year can reach between 30-39 days.

The annual average temperature falls into the range between +2.8° С and +6.8° С.

Year T TM Tm PP V RA SN TS FG TN GR 1970 3.5 9.9 -3.4 - 15.2 25 17 5 5 0 1

1971 - - - - - - - - - - -

1973 - - - - - - - - - - -

1974 3.4 10.0 -3.4 - 16.5 34 9 9 5 0 0

1975 5.0 11.6 -1.7 - 16.0 36 9 6 1 0 6

1976 3.0 9.7 -3.4 - 17.1 34 15 4 4 1 0

1977 3.9 10.6 -3.0 - 14.9 35 14 4 3 1 3

1978 4.2 11.5 -2.9 - 13.5 21 13 1 2 0 0

1979 4.2 11.0 -2.9 - 14.7 28 12 6 1 0 2

1980 3.8 10.4 -3.1 - 16.7 20 9 8 1 0 1

1981 3.4 10.0 -2.9 - 16.7 23 14 3 1 0 1

1982 4.6 11.1 -2.0 222.51 16.7 20 11 4 0 0 1

1983 4.3 10.9 -2.2 70.61 17.1 27 10 1 2 0 1

1984 3.4 9.9 -3.1 105.41 17.7 30 9 3 3 0 0

1985 2.8 9.2 -3.7 167.65 17.3 28 17 8 2 0 0

1986 3.6 9.7 -2.7 259.06 16.4 32 17 5 1 0 0

1987 3.1 9.0 -3.3 193.81 17.5 42 20 8 2 0 0

1988 3.6 10.1 -3.1 96.79 18.7 41 11 5 6 0 0

1989 4.6 11.2 -2.5 38.11 17.2 26 14 6 9 0 0

Page 44: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

44

1990 4.2 10.7 -2.4 1.27 16.8 35 15 8 4 0 0

1991 4.1 10.6 -2.6 0.00 16.7 30 19 2 2 1 1

1992 - - - - - - - - - - -

1993 3.9 10.1 -2.7 0.00 14.9 32 14 5 4 0 1

1994 5.0 11.6 -1.9 89.92 14.6 24 10 4 1 0 1

1995 4.8 11.2 -2.2 0.51 16.2 22 8 2 0 0 2

1996 - - - - - - - - - - -

1997 5.0 11/7 -2.1 24.89 15.5 20 5 4 1 0 0

1998 5.3 11.6 -1.3 0.00 14.6 36 14 2 7 0 0

1999 5.1 11.7 -1.9 - 13.8 27 15 8 0 0 1

2000 3.9 10.3 -2.7 146.27 12.9 29 14 9 2 0 0

2001 4.6 11.1 -2.1 397.73 13.9 25 14 3 1 0 0

2002 - - - - - - - - - - -

2003 4.2 9.9 -2.4 148.60 14.8 43 19 6 6 0 0

2004 5.7 12.4 -1.3 38.85 15.6 23 11 3 0 0 0

2005 - - - - - - - - - - -

2006 5.4 12.0 -1.8 - 16.2 32 13 2 2 0 0

2007 6.8 13.2 -0.1 - 15.4 19 15 2 3 0 0

2008 5.4 12.0 -1.8 - 15.4 40 12 3 1 0 0

2009 5.1 11.7 -2.1 - 15.8 33 15 7 1 0 0

2010 4.2 10.7 -2.9 - 16.3 36 32 2 2 1 0

2011 4.0 10.3 -2.9 117.35 14.4 31 15 5 5 0 0

2012 4.2 10.4 -2.6 - 16.2 37 17 4 4 0 0

Table 4-1 Average weather data of Sainshand city for 1970-2012

Description:

T - Annual average temperature (°C)

TM - Highest annual average temperature (°C)

Tm - Lowest annual average temperature (°C)

PP - Total volume of the annual precipitation /rain, snow/ (mm)

V - Annual average wind speed (km/h)

RA - Number of rainy days in a year

SN - Number of snowy days in a year

TS - Number of rainy days in a year with thunder and lightning

FG - Number of days with dense fog

TN - Number of days with heavy dust storms

RA - Number of rainy days with hails

4.1.2 Precipitation

In regard of the precipitation, Dornogovi Province, where the project is located, belongs

to the area with low humidity. The average precipitation in July is measured by 40-60

mm, whereas in October it reaches only 5 mm and during the winter in March the air

Page 45: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

45

humidity is about 50-60%. It rains approximately 30 days of the year, the average volume

of the precipitation are recorded at 100 mm. In a year there are approximately 112

cloudless and 40 cloudy days, whereas in the lower layer of the stratosphere

approximately 267 days were cloudless and 3 days were cloudy. It snows occasionally

from October until April around two days per month. The average snow layer thickness

reaches only 1-2 cm. while the thickest snow layers can reach up to 14 cm.

Month January February March April M

ay

June Jul

y

Au

gu

st

Se

pte

mb

er

Oct

ober

Nov

emb

er

Decembe

r

Year

Highest value°C (°F)

1.1

13.1

21.6

29.4

36.7

40.0

39.5

38.4

32.6

26.6

14.3

6.

2

40

(104) (34) (55.6) (70.9) (84.9) (98.1) (104) (103.1) (101.1) (90.7) (79.9) (57.7) (43.2)

Highest average

value°C (°F)

−11.8

−6.7

3.0

14.1

22.5

27.5

29.4

27.5

20.8

12.0

−0.6

−9.8

10.66

(10.8) (19.9) (37.4) (57.4) (72.5) (81.5) (84.9) (81.5) (69.4) (53.6) (30.9) (14.4) (51.18)

Daily average °C

(°F)

−18.1

−13.7

−4.2

5.9

14.5

20.4

22.7

20.9

13.6

4.4

−7.0

−15.6

3.6

5 (−0.6) (7.3) (24.4) (42.6) (58.1) (68.7) (72.9) (69.6) (56.5) (39.9) (19.4) (3.9) (38.56)

Lowest average value

°C (°F)

−22.8

−19.5

−10.9

−1.1

7.2

13.6

16.8

15.0

7.5

−1.4

−12.3

−20.4

−2.36

(−9) (−3.1) (12.4) (30) (45) (56.5) (62.2) (59) (45.5) (29.5) (9.9) (−4.7) (27.77)

Lowest value °C

−35

−35.8

−27.1

−22.6

−10.2

3.2

7.2

5.6

−4.4

−17.1

−28

−34.3

−35.8

(°F) (−31) (−32.4) (−16.8) (−8.7) (13.6) (37.8) (45) (42.1) (24.1) (1.2) (−18) (−29.7) (−32.4)

Precipitation,

mm

0.5

1.1

1.5

3.1

8.1

16.1

31.0

30.9

10.9

4.6

2.1

1.

4

111.3

(inches) (0.02) (0.043) (0.059) (0.122) (0.319) (0.634) (1.22) (1.217) (0.429) (0.181

)

(0.083

)

(0.055) (4.382)

Daily average

precipitation

(≥ 1.0 mm)

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.7

1.6

2.8

5.4

4.4

1.8

1.0

0.6

0.4

1

9

.

5

Source: NOAA (1961-1990) [3]

Table4-2 Temperature and precipitation data for Sainshand city (1961-1990)

4.1.3 Wind

It is constantly windy throughout the year and according to data and record of the

weather observation station of Sainshand city the wind direction comes mostly from the

north and northwest, less from the west and southeast. The wind speed can reach in

January, April and October 6 - 8 m/second. The lowest wind speed is measured in July

and reaches 2 m/second. There are 20-30 days in a year with the wind speed over 15

m/second and over 10 days in a year with black blizzard and dust storms. In average there

are 13-20 days in a year without any wind. The strongest winds are measured mostly

during the spring, whereas the lowest winds are occurring only during the summertime -

the wind speed can reach 4.2-4.3 m/second. The average wind speed reaches accordingly

Page 46: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

46

4 m/second. (Please refer to the following tables for the wind speed. Data source:

Information and Research Institute of Meteorology, Central Databank, 20130917)

Station Year Januar

y

Febru

ary

Marc

h

April Ma

y

Ju

ne

Jul

y

Au

gu

st

Se

pte

m

be

r

Oc

to

be

r

Nove

mbe

r

De

ce

m

be

r Sainshand

city

2008 3

.

3

4.2 4.6 4.9 6.5 4.4 3.4 3.9 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.2

Sainshand

city

2009 4

.

1

4.5 4.5 4.4 5.8 5.3 4.0 3.7 4.6 4.0 4.0 3.9

Sainshand

city

2010 5.0 4.4 5.3 5.4 5.6 3.8 4.2 4.4 3.7 3.9 4.0 5.0

Sainshand

city

2011 4.0 3.2 5.9 4.8 6.0 4.4 4.1 3.3 4.0 3.3 2.8 2.6

Sainshand

city

2012 3.4 4.4 4.5 5.9 5.6 5.2 3.8 4.2 3.6 4.6 4.6 4.5

Table4-3 Average wind speed (m/second)

Station Year Jan

uar

y

Fe

br

ua

ry

M

ar

ch

Ap

ril

M

a

y

J

u

n

e

J

u

l

y

A

u

g

u

s

t

Se

pte

m

be

r

Oct

obe

r

Novem

ber

De

ce

m

be

r Sainshand

city

2008 1

2

14 18 20 28 2

0

2

0

14 14 16 10 14

Sainshand

city

2009 1

8

24 24 16 24 2

0

1

8

14 20 20 14 28

Sainshand

city

2010 2

0

14 20 20 20 1

6

1

4

16 16 14 16 20

Sainshand

city

2011 1

6

16 16 20 28 1

6

1

6

16 14 14 14 12

Sainshand

city

2012 1

6

14 18 24 20 2

6

1

6

16 21 24 28 17

Table 4-4 Highest wind speed (m/second)

Station_id year calm N NE E SE S SW W NW

Sainshand

city

2008 25.8 22.1 5.1 4.6 3.8 16.2 4.6 23.9 19.7

Sainshand

city

2009 25.1 24.6 5.5 5.7 4.3 15.2 5.0 22.9 16.9

Sainshand

city

2010 24.2 25.7 5.7 5.7 4.5 12.8 3.6 24.9 17.1

Sainshand

city

2011 30.5 30.5 5.4 3.5 3.5 13.9 3.3 24.1 15.8

Sainshand

city

2012 16.8 21.9 6.3 4.9 6.2 13.3 4.7 24.0 18.7

Table4-5 Repetition of the wind speed at the Sainshand Power Plant (%) - 2008-2012

Page 47: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

47

Figure 4-1Repetition of the wind speed

4.1.4 Air Quality

Currently there is no major air pollution, before the implementation of the Solar PV

Power Plant project.

The following table shows the data of air pollution for the 3rd

of October.

Dornogovi Province

Average data of the air pollution for the 3rd

of October

Quantitative

indices

Quantitative

indices for

Sainshand city Air

quality Remarks Impact on human health

SO2 NO2

0-50 20 Very

good Green

Does not have any negative

impact on human health

51-100 55 Good Yellow

The air quality fulfills all

requirements. However,

hypersensitive people may be

influenced by some particular

polluting substances. For

example, hypersensitive

people may suffer under

respiratory diseases caused by

ozone or fine dust particles.

Table 4-6 Average data of the air pollution for the 3rd

of October

Page 48: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

48

4.1.5 Solar irradiation

Solar power is one of the major and crucial factors in the formation of the atmosphere,

circuit flow of the atmosphere, like land concave and convex in the formation of the

weather in any region. Furthermore, transformation of the solar light into heat energy

has enormous impact on the soil color, texture, plant height, density, porosity and snow

layer. In the particular area the sun shines in average during 3338 hours of the year.

During the winter season the sun shines less, e.g. during 256 hours, whereas during the

summertime the sun shines longer, e.g. during 309 hours. The total volume of the

average annual radiation in the particular province is equal to 434.5 MJ/m2. In regard of

geographical location, the Solar PV Power Plant is situated at coordinates 44.9° North

110.1° East and at 940 meters above the sea level. The selected project area is cloudless

during 257 days throughout of the year. Horizontal sun ray shading on the earth surface

is one of the most important factors of the Solar PV Power Plant. Total volume of the

solar radiation determines also the capacity and other technical specifications of

installed technical equipment and appliances. Annual total volume of the solar radiation

per field unit is 1638 KW/h, whereas diffused solar radiation per field unit is equal to

516 KW/h.

4.2 Landscape and Geology

4.2.1 Landscape

Dornogovi province has the total size of 114.5 thousand km2 and is located in the

southern part of Mongolia with steppe surface. Dornogovi province belongs to the desert

region of the country, including vast steppes, such as Ovoo, Daintovog, Baast, Naiman,

Tuulai, Tarmag and wide valleys, such as Gurvanbayan, Uneget, Tukhum, Hoer Zaan. Its

northern part is situated in the intermediary area with prairie and desert. Furthermore,

mountains and hills, such as Otsol Sansar, Ikh Baga Dulaan, Khutag Uul, Argal, Argalant,

Bayan and Arvan Naiman Bogd are located within the territory of the particular province.

The lowest point is located in the Bayangiin Desert at 703 meters above sea level.

Southern part of the province is slightly sandy.

Sainshand city is the municipal and administrative center of Dornogovi province with the

total size of 109,472.30 km2(234.6 thousand hectares) and is located 463 kilometers from

Ulaanbaatar and 245 kilometers from Zamiin-Uud border point (TN: Southern border to

China), at the altitude of 938 meters above sea level. The project area is located at

approximately 940 m above sea level, at a distance of 4 km north-west of Sainshand city

Page 49: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

49

and generally on a level earth surface. Within the project area there are very few plants.

High and tall grass doesn't grow at all.

Figure 4-2: Map of Mongolia - Dornogovi province

Figure4-3 On site view in south-west direction Figure 4-4 On site view in west direction

4.2.2 Geological structure and stratigraphy of the region

Within the sandstone deposit area rocks and stone pieces from Higher Proterozoic and

Lower Cretaceous periods, such as in Tsagaantsav, Manlai, Shinekhudag, Khukhteeg

formations. Also rocks and stone pieces from the upper fourth-modern sedimentary

Page 50: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

50

period and metamorphic rocks from upper Proterozoic period are represented in the

area.

Proterozoic formation (PR)

Higher embodiment (PR2)

A.N.Rasskazchikov (TN: Russian geologist) has estimated the age of metamorphic

rocks and stone formations, discovered and widely spread in the neighboring territory to

the Proterozoic period. This sediment along a latitude north of tectonic faults, Lower

Cretaceous period of Khukhteeg, the upper Jurassic sediments in the top layer of liparit,

quartz, dacite porphyry and flanks with its hassock layer. This sediment structure,

composition and metamorphism are relatively stable and consists of epidote-quartz-

chloride and epidote-quartz and sericite-quartz crystalline schist (slate).

Jurassic structure (J)

Higher embodiment (J a)

Jurassic consolidation is located in the upper middle and mafic effusive is spread in area

of 1140, 5m high Suul hill, situated to the south-east of the region. This sediment

consists of basalt, andesite-basalt, andesite porphyritic and rare earth elements and its

hassocks. The prevalence in spreading is recorded in case of andesite and andesite-

basalt. Particularly effusive andesite porphyritic is spread mainly around the Suul hill.

Basalt and andesite-basalt has mostly dark gray, dark brown, rosy reddish and

sometimes amugdalaceous rock textures and has the appearance of slag. Almonds or

blister have the size between 1-2 mm and 10 cm, and is often filled with chalcedony.

Dust accumulation of chalcedony occurs in the region. The main mass of basalt is dark-

colored with glazing structure and plagioclase crystals with andesite-basalt are observed

as well. The thickness of the base medium effusive thickness is estimated by researchers

and scientists at the range of 80-300 m.

Lower Cretaceous structure (K1)

Tsagaantsav formation (K1ss)

This sediment was initially named "tuffogen" and classified by V.K. Chaikovskii in

1934 as an independent svita. In 1955 the Russian geologist I.Ye.Turishyev has

implemented new dissection in the depression of Dornogovi province, nearby to

Tsagaantsav well and named it since then Tsagaantsav svita. Previous researchers

allocated these sediments based on their origin and lithological composition divided in

two sub-levels, including the lower sub-layer formation widely spread in this region.

Page 51: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

51

Manlai formation (К1mn)

Previous researchers and scientists have determined that sediments of this formation are

spread from the mountain to the west, from Oni plateau to the east, surrounded by

sediments of Tsagaantsav formation from the north and east sides of the area. This

sediment is generally slopes from the toe red, reddish brown, red colored stones,

conglomerates, gravels and sandstones. They mostly consist of sand rocks, sandstones,

clay, neutral elements, aleurolite, stones of a thin layer and lenticularis derived from

surrounding rivers and lakes.

Shinekhudag formation (К1sh)

Sediments of this formation were discovered in the north side of Tsogt steppe along to

the hills with height of 1076.0 m and 1026.4 m. Sediments are spread in a small area

stretching from east to west across the area. Sediments of this formation are mainly of a

black and dark gray, dark gray, gray, green or gray green color dominated by mud and

naangijin, "paper" schist, grained sandstones of different sizes and particles. It also

contains aleurolite, gravel of small and medium size, gravel with good and medium

smoothness on the surface, conglomerates with small amounts of stones, limestone and

shale from brooding.

Khukhteeg formation (К1ht)

Sediments of Khukhteeg formation were classified by Mongolian geologists

G.Bömböröö and B.Lkhündev within the framework of 1:200.000 scale geological

mapping works in this region during 1986-1988. Previous researchers have classified

the area initially only to the Lower Cretaceous period. Sediments in this region are

belonging in regard of their spreading to the most widespread sediments. Sediments on

the earth surface have all different appearances; however the way how they are spread

in the area is similar with any other formation sediments.

Upper Cretaceous structure (K2)

Bayanshiree formation (К2bs)

Sediments of this formation are spread in the northwestern region, has around the

western edge relatively small area. Of the sediment in the bottom of gray, light gray,

checkered gray color predominantly sandstone, gravel, small and medium pebble

conglomerate and aleurolite, and mud and stones at the top, a small pebble

conglomerate gravellite, with clay delicate stage and containing lenticular reddish,

yellowish, pale, greenish sandstone, dominated by clay, sand and pebble. In the

Page 52: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

52

sediments of the Lower Cretaceous major depression hanging around to be spread over

the surface and the occurrence is not very common.

Neogene period (N)

Sediments classified to the Neogene period are spread around the Suul hill, including

the wide surrounding area.

Miocene period (N1)

Sediments of the Miocene period are mostly particolored, but also sometimes red

colored with clay, loam, sandy loam, sandy and gravel, pebble, grainy sand structure.

Sediments derived from the lap of rivers, such as gravel and debris, pebble-dominated

lake, river originating from clay, loam, sandy loam, sandy and grainy dominated.

Fragments of the gravel composition vary depending on the results of the surrounding

rocks of different structures and compositions.

Quaternary period (Q)

Sediments of the Upper Quaternary period (QIII- IV)

Theses sediments widely, including lower Cretaceous sediments covers the whole

spread. It is spread with more thickness especially in marginal areas without any hills

and mountains. These sediments are originated from talus proluvial, proluvial-

proluvium lake and the north-east area, south-west areas, for the most part of the talus

proluvium is mostly sandy loam, sand, clay aggregate, and rare earth elements with

gravels and pebbles.

Modern sediments (QIV)

Modern sediments of the area are mostly of alluvial proluvial, elyuvi-proluvial, over

preserved from sediments are the most common. Alluvial-proluvium sediments usually

ravine, along the valleys and narrow ravines and rare earth element containing mud

stage sand or sandy loam moderate smoothness aggregates, small and medium-size

pebbles composed pebbles. Elyuvi proluvium sediments of the northwestern half of the

area is fairly widespread in various smoothness. Over preserved sediments are

widespread in the south and southeast area, and is more prevalent in the east.

Page 53: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

53

Late Paleozoic complexes (PZ3)

This region of the Late Paleozoic spread complexes based acidic and alkaline

ingredients interactive with epi-meso-abyssal phases‟ sediments complex. This

mountain area is 300 km2 wide and has a right-sided triangle shape. The boundaries are

not even, with the upper Proterozoic crystalline schist to the left and Jurassic-year-old

basalt to the north, longitude direction of tectonic faults borders. Crystalline schists

bound the boundary of chert has held strong shape.

Sediments of the Medium and Upper Quaternary period (QIII-IV)

These sediments are widely distributed across the area. Along the Erdenetsogt valley

dry riverbed between the convex smart and fills the lateral side of hill slopes flattened

surface with low or medium smoothness, smooth boulders and gravel of various sizes,

pebble and debris and sand mixture of clay, silt, clay and sand.

4.3 Noise

Noise can be defined as unwanted sound. The sound pressure level emitted from any

activity that is audible by a receiver is dependent upon a number of factors. The impact of

the noise depends not only on the sound pressure level but on elements such as the

frequency spectrum, the duration of the specific noise, the time of day, the activity, and

the attitude of the receiver.

All these aspects must be taken into account in assessing the impact of noise. There is no

information on existing background noise levels in the study area. However, the area is

largely desolate and from social interviews and the site visit, it was determined that the

wind was the dominant source of noise in the project area. They are no other sources of

noise, apart from the occasional bird call, vehicles visiting or passing the existing site,

and grazing livestock.

Noise is measured in units of decibels (dB). However, to take account of the varying

sensitivity of people to different frequencies, a weighting scale has been universally

adopted called „Aweighting‟, the results of monitoring being expressed as dB(A). In

general, the minimum perceived difference in noise level is 3dB(A) and an increase of

10dB(A) is perceived as a doubling of loudness.

Page 54: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

54

Sound Environment

Pressure Level (dBA)

Subjective Evaluation Environment

Outdoor Indoor

140 Deafening Jet aircraft at 25m

130 Threshold of pain Jet aircraft during takeoff

at a distance of 100m

120 Threshold of feeling Elevated Train Hard rock band

110 jet flyover at 300m Inside propeller plane

100 Very Loud Power mower,

motorcycle at 8m, car

horn at 3m, crowd

noise at football game

90 Propeller plane flyover at

300m, noisy urban street

Full symphony or

band, food blender,

noisy factory

80 Moderately Loud Diesel truck (65kph) at

16m

Inside auto at high

speed, garbage

disposal, dishwasher

70 Loud B-757 cabin during flight Close conversation,

vacuum cleaner,

electric typewriter

60 Moderate Air-conditioner

condenser at 5m, near

highway traffic

General office

50 Quiet Private office

40 Farm field with light

breeze,birdcalls

Soft stereo music in

residence

30 Very quiet Quiet residential

neighborhood

Bedroom, average

residence(without TV

and stereo)

20 Rustling leaves Quiet theater,

whisper

10 Just audible Human breathing

0 Threshold of hearing

Source: Ramsey and Sleeper, 1994.

Table 4-7 Typical Sound Pressure Levels Associated with Common Noise Sources

Specific

Environment

Critical health effect(s) LAeq [dB] Time base

[hours]

Outdoor living area Serious annoyance,

daytime and evening

55 16

Moderate annoyance,

daytime and evening

50 16

Dwelling, indoors Speech intelligibility and

moderate annoyance,

35 16

Page 55: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

55

daytime

and evening

Inside

Bedrooms

Sleep disturbance, night-

time

30 8

Industrial,

commercial and

traffic

Hearing impairment 70 24

Source: WHO, 1999

Table 4-8 Guideline Values for Community Noise in Specific Environments

4.4 Soils

The particular area of Sainshand soum (municipal center) of Dornogovi province is

consisting of grasslands with brown, light brown colored soil and having the structure

of the soil, concave and convex slopes containing sandy, loamy soil. During a site visit

dated 30th of January 2013 the proposed area next to Sainshand has been evaluated by

means of trial pits distributed over the area. All eight trial pits have been documented

with a handheld GPS (refer to Figure4-5) and have a maximum depth of approximately

2m. The soil profiles have been recorded and evaluated on site from a geological expert

(refer to Figure4-6).

Figure 4-5: Trial pits

Page 56: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

56

Figure 4-6 Soil profiles

The soil encountered in the trial pits consists of silty sand and sandy silt, partly with 20-

30cm thick gravel intercalations. Due to the fact that the trial pits have been performed in

January in frozen ground, the soil layer density appears to be higher than during the

summer months. In the southeast of the investigated area, the terrain is ascending to a hill

ridge. In this part, the sandy-silty soil diminishes, and the gravel content of the soil is

higher due to the nearness of the underlying rock.

The groundwater has not been encountered in the trial pits which have reached an

average depth of 2m.

The soil encountered in the trial pits consists of medium dense silty sand and sandy silt

layers from top to bottom (approx. 2m below ground surface), with 20-30cm thick gravel

intercalations. Depending on the results of pile ramming tests which are recommended to

determine the pile stability, the soil is regarded as suitable for rammed pile foundations.

A higher ram force may be required in order to penetrate gravel layers.

4.5 Water bodies

Hydro-geological conditions:

Khukhteeg (K1ht) formation of the Lower Cretaceous period contains pore-water

complex layers of water-bearing sediments of various coarse and loose cemented

Page 57: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

57

sandstone, gravellite and brown coal generation, floor, gray, dark gray siltstone and mud

stone, small and medium-sized rounded gravel conglomerates, sometimes carbonated

mixture and iron oxide and tight sandstone, coal argillite formation.

According to hydro-geological survey implemented in 2010 Khukhteeg (K1ht)

formation of the Lower Cretaceous period water contained in the water complex

belongs to Ages 2-3 and Ages of insulation in the muddy rocks (silty mud stone,

siltstone) terms.

However, weak cemented mainly contains water and various grains sandstone,

gravellite and coal joints, seams and water between layers of different hydraulic for

creating a water complex.

Sediments of the Quaternary (QIII-IV) period are of the origin of the middle-upper

quaternary slopes and foothills, modern classification of Quaternary sediments from the

river lap boulders, gravel and various grains of sand, loam, clay and silty sediments

consist mainly of rock type compositions depending on the species similar to a water

phase synthesis and the accumulation of sediments in the pore-layer type properties.

Geological, hydro-geological formation of underground water depending on the

hydraulic characteristics of surface, mostly in air pressure, and precipitation and

deposits in places around the watershed fed by the state of flow direction and north-east,

east and east to the south.

Underground water reserves:

Groundwater resources in the south of Mongolia are not studied certainly therefore we

have no definite information and data about specific features and volume of groundwater

resources in the named regional area. These sedimentary rocks and bedrocks embrace

tidal and non-tidal water layers. Surface water layers contained in sedimentary rocks are

generally regarded by rainfall infiltration but here are very little renewable chances in

underground water layers. Moreover some groundwater layers in this regional area are

defined as “closed aquifer” and it is cut off from the renewable source and considered as

depleted resources.

No shortage of underground water resources is expected within the project

implementation area or surroundings due to construction of the Solar PV power plant

and its later operation. But there is high risk of potential fuel leak of the petrol

distributing cars used in equipment transportation or construction work; another reason

is the indiscriminate release of household solid and liquid waste which has an impact on

Page 58: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

58

temporary runoff pollution and groundwater layers.

Mongolian Law on Water was debated and ratified last time in April 2004 by the

Parliament. The current Law on Water is in force since July 2004. Mongolian law on

water's surface and groundwater resources is to protect these resources over the use of

defined management responsibilities. The amount of water used will vary depending on

the license level. If the amount of water used per day is more than 100m3, the use shall

be authorized by government authority. If the amount of water used per 50-100m3, a

water use permit shall be obtained from provincial or municipal environmental

department. However, if the amount of water used per day is less than 50m3, it shall be

regulated and authorized by the related administration of soum or district. Water-use

permit, the 5-year contract extension, as well as the right to 20-year term shall be issued.

Following requirements shall be fulfilled according to the law by applicants (legal body

or entity):

Waste not up to the required standard of wastewater treatment facilities;

To reduce the amount of waste water recycling technology;

Have paid all the fees associated with the use of water; and

Water pump to be put on the water meter.

Biological soil conservation measures are not taken, or in the future be able to

salt marshes and ponds, canals, lakes, dams and water cleaning facilities to

capture and use is prohibited.

Water used to send the request along with the environmental impact

assessment.

4.6 Biodiversity

Occasional friable sand, steppe deserts with various plant species, foothills of low and

stony mountains and dried water beds can be found in this region. However, the solar

power plant to be built is located 4 km north-west of the town and the exact location has a

rough, rocky terrain with the characteristics of a steppe desert.

Most of the plant species in the region belong to the dry-rocky ecological communities

and a few others belong to the dry-salt marsh ecological communities, which can be seen

as a distinguishing feature of the area. In general, the land on which the power plant is to

be built has more or less degraded and has been widely covered by antropophilus plants.

As of fauna that represents the region in which Sainshand town is located, only few

species of vertebrates observed in addition to few ground and soil-inhabiting insects that

Page 59: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

59

is typical to extreme arid environment. The project area has avian representatives of

Passeriformes of the steppe-desert and the chance of migratory birds passing over is low.

This research on biodiversity of the region was based on the results of the field survey

that was conducted by a steppe research team between 16th

-20th

September, 2016 and

also in comparison with observation notes from other research activities conducted in the

region earlier.

4.6.1 Environment Climate Conditions, Methods and Methodologies

4.6.1.2 Summary of climate conditions that affect animal life

This land is one of the driest areas in Mongolia with steppe deserts, as well as unstable

sandhills. The Sainshand town area comprises of foothills of low mountains within the

desert steppe, a slightly muddy, sandy desert steppe area, and steppe of low productivity

with abundant Anabasis brevifolia. Primary plant species of the region include Stipa

glareosa, Anabasis bervifolia and Allium polyrrhizum. However, the project located area

is mainly represented by Reaumuria soongorica, Nitraria sphaerocarpa, Salsola rasserina

or plant species of desert types of saxaul-marsh, semi-bushes and marshy-bushes of

desert area with sandy brown steppe soil (Zygophyllum xanthoxylon) of foothills of Gobi

mountains and dried water bed marsh area of desert steppe low land. In addition to the

plant communities described above, typical Mongolian steppe with low hills and smooth

slopes are observed and prevalent plant species are Stipa glareosa, S. gobica, Ajania

trifida.

Additionally, in some areas, typical Mongolian steppe with plant species of Saltwort or

Salsola tragus occur in high and low bouldery hills, between mountains and hillsides, in

areas of rocky semi-producitve soil, and in particular, in the Dornogovi province, steppe

zones are observed predominantly with Ajania fruticulosa, Anabasis brevifolia,

Krascheninnikovia ceratoides, Kochia prostrata, Ptilafrostris pelliotii, Caragana

leucophloea, C. pygmaea, Stipa gobica, S. Glareosa.

4.6.1.2 Research methods and materials

This preliminary research has been conducted to assess the state of vertebrate species in

the region where the solar power plant is to be built. Methods include commonly used

methods in field research, traditional research methods used for collection and

observation of invertebrate, amphibians, reptiles and birds, along with other methods

such as collecting animals from their nests, night-time research, estimating populations

using extrapolation method, gathering mammals, and using live-catchers and other

Page 60: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

60

methods for various types of research on animal biology, ecology and their distinctive

way of life.

This report was written using materials from previous studies and print materials through

literature review and other resources collected from many years of field research

activities including Joint Mongolian-Soviet Biological Expedition of the 1971 summer-

fall and 1985 spring-summer; and results of the Field stationary research of the Ecology

Laboratory of the Institute of Biology from 1990-1992 and summer field research of

2002.

4.6.2 Plant Communities, State of Pasture Condition

The Sainshand soum area where the solar power plant is to be built upon is a steppe

desert area and its vast valleys are covered with plants, such as Stipa gobica, Anabasis

brevifolia, Allium polyrhizum, Scorzonera radiata Fisch. L, Saltwort or Salsola,

Heteropappus altaicus, Artemisia frigida, Artemisia rutifolia, Caragana bungei,

Caragana leucophloea and Salsola rosacea and pasture types such as Stipa glareosa-

ajania, Stipa glareosa-artemisia-allium, Stipa glareosa-allium, allium-stipa glareosa,

Stipa glareosa-atremisia, Stipa glareosa-caragana, Stipa glareosa- Anabasis brevifolia,

artemisia, Anabasis brevifolia-salsola and Peganum harmala-allium salsola-stipa

glareosa

ID Plant Community (latin) Plant Community (mongolian)

1 Stipa gobica-Allium polyrhizum Таана-Говийн хялганат бүлгэмдэл

2 Stipa glaerosa-Salsola passerina Борбударгана-Сайрын хялганат бүлгэмдэл

3 Stipa gobica-Cleistogenes soongorica Зүүнгарын хазааргана-Говийн хялганат

бүлгэмдэл

4 Caragana leucophloea – Stipa glaerosa Алтан харгана – Сайрын хялганат

бүлгэмдэл

5 Stipa gobica-Convolvulus ammanii Сэдэргэнэ-Говийн хялганат бүлгэмдэл

Table 4-9 Plant Communities in Project Area

№ Prominent species

1 Говийн хялгана (Stipa tianschanica subsp. gobica)

Page 61: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

61

2 Таана сонгино (Allium polyrrhizum)

3 Бор бударгана (Salsola passerina)

4 Caragana leucophloea (Алтан харгана)

5 Зүүнгарын улаанбударгана (Reaumuria soongorica)

Table 4-10 Prominent species in Project Area

The project area has no endemic plant species, but 5 semi-endemic species (Stipa gobica,

Stipa glaerosa, Salsola passerina, Reaumuria songarica, Thymus gobica), no endangered

species, and 2 rare species (Ephedra sinica, Stellaria dichotoma) 3 relict species

(Amygdalus pedunculata, Ulmus pumila) and no species that have entered the Red List

(2013, 2011)

4.6.3 Summary of Research on Vertebrate Species

Amphibians

The only amphibian spotted (Table 4-11) in the Sainshand area, Central Asia, due to the

severity of the climate conditions, is the Mongolian Toad (Bufo raddei). However, there

is no possibility that this animal exists on the land that the Solar Power plant is to be built.

They may move to steppe-deserts on autumn nights and may find shelter in abandoned

rodent burrows. This particular species was found in many areas of Dornogovi province,

and the western edge of its distribution range reaches along the Valley of the Lakes and

stops just before the Great Lakes Basin. However, it can be found in the mountainous

parts of the Khangai and Khentii regions, and also commonly found in steppe, steppe-

deserts and desert areas throughout Mongolia (Munkhbayar Kh., 2001 – Мөнхбаяр Х.,

2001). The Mongolian Toad was found in Sainshand area during rainy weather and also

in wet and humid areas of human settlements. They affect the population number of

invertebrates in the region greatly and become a food source for other animals, and thus,

are connected to the food chain of animals in extreme conditions significantly.

Reptilians

Reptiles are usually endemic to the Gobi region. According to the Herpetological

population distribution classification of Mongolia, observed and surveyed by us reptiles

belong to the Central and East Mongolian Districts (N. B. Ananyeva, Kh. Munkhbayar et

al., 1997 - Ананьева Н. Б., Мөнхбаяр Х. нар 1997).

Page 62: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

62

In Sainshand area, 3 species of reptiles from 3 families can be found (Table 4-11). Most

of them were found in settled areas and villages and, additionally, very few Toadhead

Agama have been seen in the area that is planned for the Solar Power Plant. However in

the Sainshand area, the Phrynocephalus versicolor of the Agamidae family, The E. Argus

of the Lacertidae family, The Agkistrodon halys of the Crotalidae family can rarely be

seen. Among these Reptiles, lizards in particular play a crucial role in the food chain,

particularly affecting the population of insects that feed on plant roots (for example the

Kasaby‟s ladybugs).

№ Species

name Zuunbayan Ugii

Tsagaan

nuur

Altan

Khokhii Sandy Rocky Steppe

Damp

place

Common

/rare

AMPHIBIA

Bufonidae

1 Bufo raddei + + + -

+ ñ

REPTILIA

Agamidae

2

Phrynoceph

alus

versicolor + + - + +

c

Lacertidae

3

Eremias

argus + + + - +

+

ñ

Colubridae

Crotalidae

4

Aqkistrodon

halys + + + + + + + + ñ

Table 4-11. Species of Amphibia and Reptilia

Page 63: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

63

Birds

Among the vertebrates of the Gobi region, one of the most widely existing, likely to

come across with humans, and likely to be found in settlements are birds. Avian studies

in the territory of Mongolia including findings and collections done by the members of

the Russian Geological Society, such as famous N. M. Przewalski and P. K. Kozlov on

their way through Mongolia are still kept today. Additionally, bird research that has been

done by various other studies including The Joint Mongolian - Soviet (former) Biological

expedition from 1971 to 1980. According to the Ornithofauna geographical distribution

classification of Mongolia (A. Bold, 1990 – Болд А., 1990), birds of this area belong to

the Zamyn Uud Depression of the Northern Gobi District.

In Sainshand town and surrounding areas, according to our research 59 species of birds of

45 genera from 2 families of 11 orders (Table 4-12) were found. None of those birds are

included in the Mongolian Red List (1987, 1997, 2013), as endangered in “the Law on

Fauna”, as well as the Government Resolution No. 164 (2000) as rare bird species (2001)

and its revision of 2012.

Species name

(Latin)

Species name

(English)

Resid

ent B

reeder

Mig

rant

Bre

edin

g v

isitor

Passage M

igra

nt

Vagra

nt

Win

ter

Mig

rant

Com

mon/r

are

/very

rare

ANSERIFORME

S

Anatidae

Tadorna

1

Tadorna

ferruginea Ruddy Shelduck

+ +

r

FALCONIFORM

ES

Accipitridae

Milvus

2 Milvus migrans Black Kite

+ +

c

Accipiter

Page 64: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

64

3 Accipiter nisus

Eurasian

Sparrowhawk

+

+

Rr

Buteo

4 Buteo hemilasius Upland Buzzard +

+

c

Aquila

5 Aquila nipalensis Steppe Eagle

+ +

Rr

Aegypius

6

Aegypius

monachus Cinereous Vulture

+ +

Rr

Falconidae

Falco

7 Falco cherrug Saker Falcon

+ +

Rr

8 Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon

+

+

Rr

9 Falco naumanni Lesser Kestrel

+ +

r

10 Falco

tinnunculus Common Kestrel +

+

c

GALLIFORMES

Phasianidae

Perdix

11 Perdix dauuricae Daurian Partridge +

+

r

GRUIFORMES

Gruidae

Anthropoides

12

Anthropoides

virgo Demoiselle Crane

+ +

r

CHARADRIIFO

RMES

Charadriidae

Page 65: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

65

Charadrius

13

Charadrius

dubius little Ringed Plover

+ +

r

Vanellus

14

Vanellus

vanellus Northern Lapwing

+

+

Rr

Actitis

15

Actitis

hypoleucos Common Sandpiper

+ +

r

Calidris

16 Calidris ruficollis

Rufous-necked

Stint

+

+

Rr

Laridae

Larus

17 Larus argentatus Herring Gull

+

+

Rr

COLUMBIFORM

ES

Pterocliaidae

Syrrhaptes

18

Syrrhaptes

paradoxus Pallas' Sandgrouse +

+

r

Columbidae

Columba

19 Columba livia Rock Pigeon +

+

c

20 Columba

rupestris Hill Pigeon +

+

Cc

Streptopelia

21

Streptopelia

orientalis Oriental Turtle Dove

+

+

Rr

CUCULIFORME

S

Page 66: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

66

Cuculidae

Cucuclus

22 Cuculus canorus Common Cuckoo

+ +

r

STRIGIFORMES

Strigidae

Bubo

23 Bubo bubo Eurasian Eagle Owl +

+

Rr

Athene

24 Athene noctua Little Owl +

+

r

APODIFORMES

Apodidae

Apus

25 Apus apus Common Swift

+ +

r

26 Apus pacificus Fork-tailed Swift

+ +

c

UPUPIFORMES

Upupidae

Upupa

27 Upupa epops Eurasian Hoopoe

+ +

c

PASSERIFORM

ES

Alaudidae

Galerida

28 Galerida cristata Crested Lark +

+

c

Melanocorypha

29

Melanicorypha

mongolica Mongolian Lark +

+

r

Eremophila

Page 67: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

67

30

Eremophila

alpestris Horned Lark +

+

c

Alauda

31 Alauda arvensis Eurasian Skylark

+ +

r

Motacillidae

Anthus

32 Anthus richardi Richard's Pipit

+ +

r

33 Anthus

campestris Tawny Pipit

+ +

r

Motacilla

34 Motacilla alba White Wagtail

+ +

c

Laniidae

Lanius

35 Lanius cristatus Brown Shrike

+ +

r

36 Lanius

isabellinus Rufous-tailed Shrike

+ +

r

37 Lanius excubitor Northern Shrike +

+

c

Corvidae

Pyrrhocorax

38

Pyrrhocorax

pyrrhocorax Red-billed Chough +

+

c

Corvus

39 Corvus corax Common Raven +

+

c

Prunellidae

Prunella

40

Prunella

fulvescens Brown Accentor +

+

r

Sylvia

Page 68: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

68

41 Sylvia curruca Lesser Whitethroat

+

+

r

42 Sylvia nana Desert Warbler

+ +

c

Phylloscopus

Muscicapidae

Ficedula

43 Ficedula parva

Red-breasted

Flycatcher

+ +

r

Oenanthe

44

Oenanthe

oenanthe Northern Wheatear

+ +

c

45 Oenanthe deserti Desert Wheatear

+ +

c

Phoenicurus

46

Phoenicurus

ochruros Black Redstart

+ +

Rr

Tarsiger

47

Tarsiger

cyanurus

Orange-flanked

Bluetail

+

+

Rr

Turdus

48 Turdus pilaris Fieldfare Thrush

+

+

Rr

Paridae

Parus

49 Parus montanus Willow Tit

+

+ r

50 Parus major Great Tit

+

+ r

Ploceidae

Passer

51

Passer

domesticus House Sparrow +

+

r

52

Passer

montanus

Eurasian Tree

Sparrow +

+

Cc

Page 69: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

69

Petronia

53 Petronia petronia Rock Sparrow +

+

r

Pyrgilauda

54

Pyrgilauda

davidiana Small Snowfinch +

+

Rr

Emberizidae

Emberiza

55

Emberiza

citrinella Yellowhammer

+

+

r

56 Emberiza cia Rock Bunting

+ +

r

57 Emberiza

godlewskii Godlewski's Bunting

+ +

r

58 Emberiza pallasi Pallas' Bunting

+ +

r

Calcarius

59

Calcarius

lapponicus Lapland Bunting

+

+ r

19 40 46 3 7 3

Table 4-12 Aves

However, the Cinereous vulture Aegypius monachus and Lesser kestrel Falco naumanni,

which were included in the Asian Red list can be found in this area. Despite being listed,

these two bird species are not rare in these regions, and can be seen commonly as

migratory. The Lesser Kestrel is quite common in the Gobi and Gobi steppe areas,

however in Central Asia it is regarded as rare. Because they feed on rodents that feed on

pasture in steppes and steppe desert regions, they stabilize the rodent populations and

have a positive influence on the land. Vultures, on the other hand, are scavengers and

thus help clean the environment, but recently, their populations are increasing, resulting

in them attacking and snatching livestock as well as Mongolian gazelle and Black-tailed

gazelle calves. Around Sainshand town, the increase in the number of vultures is

observed because of increase in carcasses, cases of livestock dying and particularly

vultures and crows have been sighted while during the slaughtering of domestic livestock

as preparation of herders for winter.

Page 70: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

70

In Sainshand and its surrounding areas, there are 59 species of birds that have been noted,

of which 19 species are resident and 40 are migratory birds. The 19 resident birds include:

The Upland buzzard Buteo hemilasius, Lesser kestrel Falco naumanni, Daurian partridge

Perdix dauricae, Pallas‟s sandgrouse Syrrhaptes paradoxus, Rock pigeon Columba livia,

Hill pigeon Columba rupestris, Eurasian eagle-owl Bubo bubo, Little owl Athene noctua,

Crested lark Galerida cristata, Mongolian lark Melanocorypha mongolica, Horned lark

Eremophila alpestris, Northern shrike Lanius excubitor, Red-billed chough Pyrrhocorax

pyrrhocorax, Crow Corvus frugilegus, Brown accentor Prunella fulvescen, House

sparrow Passer domesticus, Eurasian tree sparrow Passer montanus, Rock sparrow

Petronia petronia and the Small snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis. These resident birds,

all are anthrophogenic directed and can be sighted in Sainshand (Rock pigeon, hill pigeon,

Red-billed chough, Crow, House sparrow, Eurasian tree sparrow). Upland buzzards,

Lesser kestrels, Rock pigeons, Hill pigeons, Crested larks, Mongolian larks and Horned

larks can be sighed near oil derricks regularly.

Of the above mentioned bird species, the Daurian Partridge and the Pallas‟s Sandgrouse

has the significance of being hunted and regarded as game bird species. However, over

the last decade, not only in Dornogovi province and Sainshand, but also in every other

Mongolian provinces and soums, such hunting has not been done. Furthermore, the

Eurasian Eagle Owl is endangered to their own specific habitats. There are 46 bird

species that lay eggs in this region and 19 of them are resident while the other 27 are

migratory. In settlements, plant species such as poplar trees and Caragana arborescens are

common. Sainshand‟s trees and bushy plants usually grow in the village center, on the

outskirts of army bases and nearby schools, meaning that crows, House Sparrows,

Eurasian Tree Sparrows and other birds that lay their eggs might come and nest there.

Of all total birds, 3 species (Sylvia curruca, Tarsiger cyanurus, Emberiza citronella) pass

through the region, 7 species (Accipiter nisus, Falco peregrinus, Vanellus vanellus,

Calidris ruficollis, Larus argentatus, Streptopellia orientalis, Turdus pilaris) appear in the

region by accident and 3 species (Parus montanus, P. major, Calcarius lapponicus) enter

the region to escape from the cold.

Mammals

Mammals have their own special characteristics. According to the Mammalogical

Geographical distribution classification of Mongolia (A. G. Bannikov, 1954 – Банников

А. Г., 1954) Sainshand town and its surroundings have the characteristics of Mongolia‟s

Northern Gobi District. Even though a number of mammal species have been observed

there, large mammals in the Sainshand area (larger than hares) can be considered to be

nonexistent.

Page 71: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

71

According to study, it can be concluded that there are 29 species but no large mammals in

the area where the solar power plant is to be built. From these mammals(Table 4-13), the

Wild Ass or Khulan (Equus hemionus), the Grey wolf Canis lupus, and the Eurasian lynx

is listed thus protected by the international convention on the trade of animals and plant

specimen.

No Species name

(Latin)

Species name

(English)

CIT

ES

CM

S

Re

d b

ook o

f M

on

golia

sa

ndy

pe

bb

ly

Sa

xa

ul, b

ush

Sm

all

hill

Co

mm

on

/ ra

re//

ve

ry r

are

I INSECTIVORA INSECT-EATERS

1 Hemiechinus auritus

Long-eared

Hedgehog

+ + + + c

II CHIROPTERA BAT`S

2 Plecotus austriacus

Grey long-eared

bat

+

c

3 Eptesicus nilssoni Northern bat

+

+

c

III LAGOMORPHA LAGOMORPHS

4 Ochotona daurica Daurian pica

+

+ r

5 Lepus tolai Tolai hare

+ + + + Cc

IY RODENTIA

GNAWING

ANIMALS

6

Citellus

erythrogenus

Red-cheeked

souslik

+

+

r

7 Phodopus campbell Dwarf hamster

+

+ r

8 Phodopus

roborovskii

Roborowsky`s

dwarf hamster

c

9 Cricetulus sokolovi Sokolovi`s hamster

+

r

10 Cricetulus obscurus Govi hamster

+

+

c

11 Cricetulus

Grey hamster

+ + r

Page 72: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

72

migratorius

12 Allocricetulus

curtatus Mongolian hamster

+

+

r

13 Ellobius tancrei Mole lemming

+

r

14 Alticola argentatus

Royle`s mountain

vole

+ r

15 Meriones

unguiculatus Clawed jird

+ + +

r

16 Meriones meridianus Midday gerbil

+

+

c

17 Rhombomys opimus Great gerbil

+

c

18 Mus musculus House mouse

+ + + + Cc

19 Allactaga sibirica Siberian jerboa

+ + + r

20 Allacraga bullata Gobi jerboa

+ + +

r

21 Dipus sagitta Feather-footed

+

+

Rr

22 Cardiocranius

paradoxus Satunin`s jerboa

+

Rr

Y CARNIVORA CARNIVORES

23 Canis lupus Grey wolf II - - + + + + r

24 Vulpes vulpes Common red fox

+ + + + r

25 Vulpes corsac Corsac fox

+ + + + r

26 Felis lynx European lynx II - -

+

Rr

YI PERISSODACTYLA

ODD-TOED

MAMMALS

27 Equus hemionus Asiatic Wild Ass I

+ +

Rr

28 Gazella

subgutturosa Goitred gazelle

+ +

+

Rr

29 Procapra gutturosa Mongolian gazelle

+ +

Rr

Rr 2 20 11 21 11 6

r

r 14

Page 73: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

73

Cc

Cc 2

c

c 7

Summary 29

Table 4-13 Mammalia

There are no mammals inhabiting the project area, and depending on the environment

which the animals live in, the animals in the Sainshand area can be categorized as: 20

species living in sandy terrain, 11 species in stony terrain, 21 in bushy terrain, and 11 in

rocky terrain. Some mammal species‟ distribution can be overlapped in these biotopes or

terrains and the most common animals are the long-eared hedgehog (Hemiechinus

auritus), the Tolai hare (Lepus tolai), the house mouse (Mus musculus), the grey wolf

(Canis lupus), the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the corsac fox (Corsac vulpes). The long-

eared hedgehog is endemic to the Gobi region and while previously could be sighted

frequently, has since left human settlements following the transition to a market economy.

This can be explained that the Chinese demand for use of their meat for food. Other

mammal species commonly distributed are all hunted for their fur and meat, and all

except hares are now near endangered.

In the Sainshand area, in terms of occurrence, the animals can be categorized into: 7

endangered species, 14 rare species, 2 abundant species (Lepus tolai, mus musculus)

with other animals being at normal levels. The Tolai hare, which is the most common

species in the area, can be seen around bushes and during the night. However the animal

may come out only during the night in the solar power plant area. The house mouse, on

the other hand, can be seen in settlements regularly.

4.7 Historic and Cultural Resources

Currently no historical and cultural heritage was discovered within the territory of the

project site.

4.8 Social and Economic conditions

Here in this section the existing social conditions at and surrounding the project site

including population, employment, economy, health and well-being are described.

Page 74: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

74

4.8.1 Population and Demographics

The last census of population of Mongolia was done in 2000 which includes data of

population up to soum level. However, the Mongolian National Statistical Office

prepares annually the population report collected on aimag level. According to data of

population in aimags reflected in the reports for year2000-2008, total population of

Mongolia is 2.7 million people and intensity of the total population growth is 1.56

percent1.

1 Asian Development Bank (2009)

Page 75: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

75

Figure4-7Administrative-territorial boundaries of Dornogovi province

Population growth and changes in Sainshand soum: the number of population is growing

from day to day and there are government decisions behind to build the industrial

complex in this area. Mining resources and strategically important mineral deposits in

this region have high impact on the population of Sainshand soum. The number of

households and population as of the end of 2013 is shown in the graphics below.

Administrative-territorial boundaries of Dornogovi province

Page 76: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

76

Figure 4-8 Population number of Sainshand soum

/at the end of year 2013/

There are 22,011citizens in Sainshand soum, of which 65 percent or 14,314 are at the age

of employment, 7,334 people are employed among which 366 are herders. As of the end

of 2013, 668 people are registered unemployed in the whole Sainshand soum. 28 percent

of the total population is children. By age group 63.4 percent of the total population are at

the age of 16-59; 30.5 percent are at the age of 0-15 and about 6 percent are at the age of

over 60.

Figure 4-9Population and number of households shown by bags

/at the end of 2013/

0

20000

40000

2010 2011 2012 2013

6229 6513 6251 6529

21147 21175 21109 22011

Number of households and population of Sainshand soum

Households' number Population number

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

bаg 1 bаg 2 bаg 3 bаg 4 bаg 5

Number of Households and population of Sainshand soum by bags

Households' number Population number

Page 77: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

77

Bags (local administrative-territorial units) 1-3 belong to the soum‟s center and the 4th

Bag is named the Railway Station Region, which is located in Ar shand. The 5th

Bag is

located in Zuunbayan,around 50 km away from the soum.

As a result of the Census on Population and Housing in 2010, the majority of the

population in Sainshand soum lives in proper homes.

Figure 4-10. Family housing conditions /Census in 2010 /

Indicator Measurement

unit

Bag’s name Soum

result

I II III IV V

1 Volume of the territory thousand 38482,5 13712,5 29713,5 5495,5 146876 234280

2

Population

Total number 6189 3863 4758 5304 1897 22011

Male number 2976 1784 2287 2650 971 10668

Female number 3213 2079 2471 2654 926 11343

3 Household Total number 1836 1178 1451 1523 540 6523

4 Working-age

population

Total number 4046 2475 3054 3486 1253 14314

5 Employed Total number 2152 1298 1404 1770 710 7334

1%

67%

32%

0%

Not purposed housing Building Ger

Page 78: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

78

population

6 Number of

civil servants

Total number 473 460 308 200 295 1736

7 Working-age

unemployed

people

Total number 759 457 635 835 210 2896

Male number 361 200 286 322 95 1264

Female number 398 257 349 513 115 1632

8 Registered

unemployed

citizens

Total number 143 116 221 93 95 668

Male number 67 41 73 45 40 266

Female number 76 75 148 48 55 402

9 Industrial products thousand 0 0 0 0 978000 978000

10 Enterprises number 45 45 75 42 7 214

Table 4-14 Indicators by Bags

Sainshand soum is widening every year. The Millennium road vertical axis, the vertical

axis of the railway station that connects the northern and southern neighbors passes

through this soum,and it is connected to the central power system. With such good

conditions of the infrastructure, the government of Mongolia has decided to build “The

Industrial Complex” in Sainshand. As a result, the tourism has been rapidly developing,

with increasing population growth from the migration process along the large mineral

deposits and significant construction works take place from year to year. Sainshand is a

self-reliance soum in terms of development in the Dornogovi region and has a great

potential to become a city.

As a self-reliant soum of the Dornogovi region, the most acute problem of its infrastructure

is water, which remains to be solved today. It has only groundwater resources and there is

no surface water, therefore it is necessary to develop a plan for water management, for the

rational use and protection of water which is crucial for the future development of the

soum.

Total 1-9 10-19 20-49 50+

Dornogovi province 650 501 72 57 20

Sainshand 348 271 37 26 14

Table 4-15 Number of operating entities and organizations by bags

Page 79: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

79

4.8.2 Employment

Labor force: According to the methodology of the International Labor Organization the

labor force is the sum of the number of employed people registered in the Labor and

Social Welfare Department. People at the age of employment and yet not registered in the

Labor and Social Welfare Department, pupils at the age of employment and military

officers and prisoners are not included in the labor force. As of 1995 there are 23447

people at the age of employment, among which 16777 are workers, 17786 are

economically active and 1287 are unemployed. The employment rate was72% and 5.7%

of the people were registered unemployed.

By branches the highest 44% or 7310 people are employed in the Agricultural branch,

followed by employment in the State administration with 11% or 1925, 1633 or around

10 percent are employed in the transportation and warehouse business sector.

4.8.3 Economic Development Level

4.8.3.1 Agriculture

As to agriculture in this soum, it is dominated by livestock and crop farming. As of the

end of 2013, potatoes and vegetables were grown on 16.3 thousand hectares of land with

yield of 128.3 thousand tons. Furthermore, 178 thousand tons of hay were harvested.

Figure 4-11Employees by branch, at the end of year 2013

5%

44%

4% 4% 1% 10%

11%

6% 6%

9%

Аж үйлдвэр

Хөдөө аж ахуй

Барилга

Бөөний болон жижиглэн худалдаа

Санхүүгийн байгууллага

Тээвэр агуулахын аж ахуй, холбоо

Төрийн удирдлага, батлан хамгаалах, нийгмийн даатгал

Industry

Agriculture

Building

Wholesale& retail trade

Financial organization

Transportation, warehouse & communication

Public administration, defense, social insurance

Page 80: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

80

4.8.3.2 Livestock industry

Basic sources of the Mongolians‟ livesare livestock, therefore in comparison with other

branches the Livestock Registration Statistics are more developed. Livestock Census was

first provided in 1918 but was limited to Khalkh 4 provinces, servants and apprentices,

which caused the census incomplete. Since 1924 when the Modern Statistics Service was

established, the Livestock Census began to adopt integrated methodology, data and

program. Livestock Census was conducted in summer and autumn seasons or in August

and September, but since 1961 animal husbandry has been counted at the end of the year

or in December annually.

As of the end of 2013 in the whole Sainshand soum 77446 livestock were counted.

Mainly small animals were counted in the census whereas and camel and cows only

account for ta small part. Out of totally 199 herder households in Sainshand soum 366

herders are at the age of employment.

Figure 4-13 Livestock number by type of animal husbandry

4.8.4 Health level

There is Polyclinic – 1, Specialized clinic – 0, Health Center – 1, Soum‟s hospital - 15,

Hospital of the Traditional Mongolian Medicine – 0, Military Hospital - 0, Bag‟s and

Doctor‟s sector – 30, Family Hospital – 6, Private Hospital – 7, Maternity Hospital – 16,

totally 77 health facilities/organizations are operating in whole Dornogovi province.

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

Тэмээ Адуу Үхэр Хонь Ямаа

2482 5237

2760

29509

37458

Livestock number by type of animal husbandry

Camel Horse Caw Sheep Goat

Page 81: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

81

As of 2016 in whole province totally 62621 beds are used, 8738 patients were

hospitalized which was in comparison with previous year up by 1505 people and now it

is 7.2 bed/day in average. 212956 ambulatory medical examinations were given which

was in comparison with previous year up by 13561examinations.

4.8.5 Land use

Soums of Dornogovi province are included in the following zoning which takes into

account of their geographical location, natural wealth, mineral reserves, status and future

economic development priorities, road and communication, power supply as well as

existing interconnection.

Region

number

Regional

Center

Name of soums

belonging to the region Regional development priorities

The first

zone Sainshand

Sainshand, Urgun,

Mandakh, Saikhandulaan,

Altanshiree, Delgerekh

Industrial, refinery, transport,

logistic, tourism, elite cattle

breeding, food and agricultural

zones

Table 4-16 Regional Development Outlook of Sainshand soum

4.8.6 Social Infrastructure Development Level

Dornogovi province is considered as a region with highly developed road,

communication and infrastructure. Linear infrastructure includes railway station, auto

road, power lines,etc. 422 km of UB Railway Station that connects the Russian

Federation and People‟s Republic of China passes through the territory of Dornogovi

province from the northwest and the southeast. Furthermore the Mongolia Railway

Station Shareholding Company is implementing the New Railway Station project in three

stages and its first stage nearly 404 km out of 960 km of the railway in Tavan tolgoi –

Khuut direction is planned to go through the territory of Dornogovi province from the

southwest to the northeast. Therefore, the territory of Dornogovi province is mainly

divided into 4 parts by railroad network and they are all connected to the center of

Dornogovi province.

Page 82: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

82

With regard to the auto road it is fully connected by the paved road from Ulaanbaatar city

to Zamiin-Uud. The paved road in Choir-Sainshand-Zamiin-Uud direction was built and

put into operation through financing of the Asian Development Bank, of which the

highway in Altanbulag-Ulaanbaatar-Zamiin-Uud direction is planned in the west of

existing road.

The railway station and auto road network passing through the territory of Dornogovi

province will be the main line of the transit transportation for Mongolia that connects its

southern and northern neighbors in the province.

No. Project

name

Project

implementer

Project

location

Projectduration

Implemented Ongoing Further

planned

Railway station

1 New

railway

station

Railway

station of

Mongolia

Mandakh-

Zuunbayan-

Sainshand-

Baruun Urt

In

planning

2 Old

railway

station

Ulaanbaatar

railway

station

Dalanjargalan-

Airag-

Sainshand-

Urgun-Erdene-

Zamiin Uud

Operated since

1st January,

1956 to today

3 Branch line Ulaanbaatar

railway

station

Sainshand-

Zuunbayan

about 46 km

Used during

oil extraction

in Zuunbayan

4 Branch line Airag – Bor

Undur Mining

Processing

Plant

Used now

Auto road

5 Paved Dalanjargalan- Paved road

Page 83: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

83

roads from

Ulaanbaata

r to

Zamiin-

Uud

Airag-

Sainshand-

Erdene-Zamiin

Uud

from

Sainshand to

Zamiin-Uud

was

commissioned

in 2013.

6 Highway

990km

Chinggis

Land

Development

Group LLC

concession

Dalanjargalan-

Airag-

Sainshand-

Erdene-Zamiin

Uud

In

planning

7 Paved

roads

432km

Erdenes

MGL LLC

concession

From Tavan

tolgoi mine to

Khangi-

Mandal port

In

planning

8 Paved

roads

Khangi

Khuder LLC

From Agar

mountain iron

ore mine

located on

territory of

Khatanbulag

soum to

Khangi-

Mandal port

In

planning

9 Paved

roads

Ikh Govi

Energy LLC

From Tukhum

coal mine

located on

territory of

Mandakh

soum to

In

planning,

шороон

далан

барьсан

Page 84: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

84

Khangi-

Mandal port

1

0

Paved

roads

Mon Laa

LLC

Elsteitumur

ore mine -

Tugrug valley

– in front of

Khalic bag –

Modot khuren

tolgoi – Baga

khairkhan

mountain -

margin angle

ponds –Khangi

port

In

planning

1

1

Paved

roads

COAL LLC From Ailbayan

coal mine

located on

territory of

Huvsugul

soum to

Khangi port

Conducted

gravel roads

1

2

Local dirt

roads

Used now

Power and energy

1

3

220 kV

power line

Oyu Tolgoi-

Tsagaan

suvarga-

Sainshand

In

planning

1

4

110 kV

power line

Choir-

Sainshand-

Used now

Page 85: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

85

Zamiin Uud

1

5

35 kV

power line

Sainshand-

Urgun-

Sainshand -

Zuunbayan

Olon Ovoo-

Airag

Ikh khet-Altan

shiree

Used now

1

6

15 kV

power line

Galshar-

Delgerekh

urgun-Erdene

Zuunbayan-

Huvsugul

Zuunbayan-

Ulaanbadrakh

Used now

1

7

6 and

10kV

power line

Zuunbayan-

Khamriin

Khiid

Used now

Table 4-17 Information about the infrastructural projects near Sainshand

There are 2 soums out of totally 14 soums in Dornogovi province that host the wind

renewable energy. Other soums are fully provided with electricity of 15, 35, 110 kV.

Furthermore it is planned to build Choir-Sainshand-Zamiin-Uud 454 km of power

transmission lines of 220 kV with substation.

Communication

Mobile phone reception is available in all soums‟ center but it is unreliable in deserted

rural areas. The mobile phone key operators in this rural area are the MobiCom, G-

mobile, Unitel and Skytel companies which provide mobile communication services.

Every family has at least one cell phone. There is no over ground communications links

Page 86: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

86

in the area where the project will be implemented and this project has no effects on these

signals.

Education

In 2008 the school system was transferred from previous 11-year educational system to a

new 12-year system. Completion of education in the secondary schools is compulsory for

all children in Mongolia. Compared to other regions, this province is mainly high school

attendance.

There are 5 Secondary Schools (1-12 years), 12 kindergartens in Sainshand soum,

therefore the children usually come to study from other soums.

Page 87: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

87

CHAPTER 5 THE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

The analysis of project alternatives is one of the main tenets of environmental impact

policy and procedures world-wide. A thorough, unbiased and transparent assessment of

alternatives from an environmental, social, technical and economic standpoint is one of

the most important contributions an ESIA can make to improve decision making.

The analysis for this project contains options/alternatives which are site selection

alternatives, the “With Project” versus “Without Project” alternative in addition to other

energy resources alternatives. By considering these alternatives prior to the

commencement of project activities, environmental and social project benefits can be

maximized and potential challenges can be identified and addressed.

5.1 Site Selection

In identifying a suitable site for solar power developments, various factors need to be

taken into consideration. These include factors such as meteorological data, terrain

usability, access to public roads, shading analysis and grid connection.

The project site in Sainshand is on an altitude of 940 m above sea level and has a

relatively area though slightly oriented towards northwest. The landscape shows very

scarce and low vegetation (no tree). Besides, the location has the advantage of having

great accessibility to the abroad as there is a railroad nearby connecting Mongolia with

China, offering an ideal opportunity to transport all relevant components of a PV power

plant. Solar devices were put to collect data on solar conditions and the distance to

substation was also weighed as a key element. The other sites that were considered

include Dalanzadgad, Arvaikheer, Choir, Mandalgovi, Herlingiin Den, Taishir, Dorgon

and Durgun and the energy production capacity was calculated and compared for each

site as follows:

Page 88: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

88

Table 5-1 Energy production capacity of various sites examined

Overall the project site selection process was based on a 10 year-long research made by

professors at Mongolian National University starting from 2005 and also taking into

account the careful soil research made by German experts at the site. Having put

everything into consideration, Sainshand was chosen as the site where the 30Mw solar

project is going to be implemented.

5.2‘With Project’ VS ‘Without Project’ Alternative

The table below presents the symbols that denote the various levels of environmental

impact to aid in the comparison of alternatives. Each symbol indicates an overall

evaluation of the specified environmental component and social aspect.

Table 5-2 Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact

The “Without Project” option considers the alternative of not conducting the project at all.

It is normally evaluated to assess the impacts if the project does not go ahead. This

alternative is evaluated against the implementation of solar power project as one of the

renewable energy resources in Mongolia.

Symbol Description

X Denotes potential for impact, which is not considered

significant

S- Denotes Potential Significant Adverse

Impact

S+ Denotes Potential Significant Beneficial Impact

* Denotes no change to the existing

situation

Page 89: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

89

Table 5-2 is presenting the methodology of evaluation of the overall impacts and „symbol‟

takes into consideration that a degree of mitigation is applied. Going forward with the

proposed project alternative is considered the best possible option as opposed to „No

Project‟ since the proposed project is considered a green and environmental solution for

energy generation in Mongolia. Solar energy is considered as renewable clean technology

with no emissions and as a global and local trend for energy generation.

Environmental

Components

Project Options

Proposed Project Without Project

Alternative

Terrestrial Ecology S- *

Air Quality * *

Noise Generation * *

Wastewater Generation S- *

Waste Generation / Disposal S- *

Soil & Groundwater * *

Health & Safety S- *

Socio-economic Impacts S+ x

Traffic Disturbance x *

Archaeology / Cultural

Property

x *

Energy Production S+ S-

Employment and Job

Opportunity

S+ S-

Notes:

X : Denotes potential for impact, which is not considered significant

S- : Denotes Potential Significant Adverse Impact

S+ : Denotes Significant Beneficial Impact

* : Denotes no change to the existing situation

Table 5-3 Comparison of overall environmental impacts as a result of the proposed

Project against the ‘Without Project’ alternative

5.3 Electricity Sources Alternatives

As the energy demand has risen in the past years (see graph below) Mongolia has faced

severe energy shortages and blackouts. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projected

a deficit of over 600 MW by 2016.

Page 90: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

90

Figure 5-3 Power Supply and Demand Mongolia (Source: Mongolian State Specialized

Inspection Agency)

As all above the increasing demand forces the government to find additional energy

resources and these resources could be conventional and renewable resources. The use of

the solar energy is one of the preferable options with less impact than the conventional

resources, furthermore, it is considered as green option for Mongolia with its high

sunshine days and land availability. In the following the main reasons to use solar energy

instead of conventional resources are summarized:

Solar power is pollution-free during operation.

Production end-wastes and emissions are manageable using existing pollution

controls.

End-of-use recycling technologies are under development and policies are

being produced that encourage recycling from producers.

PV installations can operate for 100 years or even more with little

maintenance or intervention after their initial set-up.

Grid-connected solar electricity can be used locally thus reducing

transmission/distribution losses.

Compared to fossil and nuclear energy sources, very little research money has

been invested in the development of solar cells, so there is considerable room

for improvement.

High efficiency.

Page 91: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

91

CHAPTER 6 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

& SOCIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

6.1 Introduction

The proposed project may have impact on the environment during construction &

operation phases. During the construction phase, the impacts may be regarded as

temporary or short-term; while long term impacts may be observed during the operation

stage. The site was evaluated on the basis of the following environmental and social

criteria:

1. Availability of sufficient area of flat terrain;

2. Avoidance of sensitive habitats and species;

3. No conflicts with other land holders.

The site has a sufficient area of flat terrain. The ground is partially covered with small

grass parts however an arid sandy area in general.

Animal species that live in such open flat terrain are not threatened or restricted in their

environment. This type of area is available in multiple forms all around the whole region.

Nonetheless it has been proposed that holes are left in the surrounding fence for smaller

animals to pass through.

The investigated area is in the property of the Mongolian Government and the PV site is

already marked and reserved at the related authority in Sainshand. So there are no

conflicts with other landholders.

The project has overall positive impacts by providing a competitive, cost-effective,

pollution free reliable mode of Solar PV power. It will certainly meet the ever increasing

demand of power and bridge the gap between demand and supply of power in Mongolia.

6.2 Impact on the climate and air quality

6.2.1 Assessment of impacts on the climate and air quality

During the operation of the project no air pollution is expected that covers a large area of

the local population, flora and fauna, soil and it will not affect the water quality in any

way. However, construction of the Solar PV power plant and installation of solar

modules and mirrors, toxic gas and dust emerged due to utilization of special machines

and equipment during their technical operation may pollute the environment.

Page 92: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

92

Total amount of toxic smoke can be kept within permitted standard level due to proper

maintenance, regular technical inspection, utilization of high quality diesel fuel.

Applicable Mongolian standard for the air quality in cities and settlements (MNS 4585-

98: Air quality. General technical requirements) and World Bank Standard are shown in

Tables 6.1 and 6.2, respectively.

Specifications Measuring

duration

Measuring unit Permitted

max. level

Analyzing method

Gas mixture

Sulfur dioxide

(SO)

during 20 minutes

Daily average

mg/m3

0.5

0.03

Aero Saline solution

MNS- 0017.2.5.12-88

Fluorescence

Carbon

monoxide (CO)

during 20 minutes

Daily average

mg/m3 83

Gas correlation

Nitric oxide

(NO2)

during minutes

Daily average

mg/m3

0.085

0.04

Griis-Yelovsk, MNS

0017.2.5.11-88

Chemiluminescence

Ozone (O3) Hourly average mg/m3 120.0 Photometric method

Dust

Dust monitoring

(SPM)

during 20 minutes

Daily average

mg/m3

0.5

0.15

Weighing method Air

suction Black lead,

plumbum

Daily average mg/m3 0.001 AC and x-ray

fluorescence

Benzopyrene Daily average mg/m3 0.001 Liquid and gas

chromatography Table 6-1 Mongolian standard for the air quality in cities and settlements MNS 4585-98

Specifications Average duration Unit

Sulfur dioxide

1 year

0.05

24 hours 0.125 1 hour 0.35

Nitric oxide 1 year 0.4

1 hour 0.2

Dust particles

1 year

0.5 PM10

PM10 24 hours 0.15

Table 6-2 Air Quality Standard of the World Bank (Source: World Health Organization,

Instructions for air quality, 2nd

edition)

Page 93: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

93

Compared study of values obtained in accordance with the applicable instructions

reveals that the data compared with Air quality Standard of Mongolia and World Bank

Standard for CO level and dust volume are relatively low and has no impact on the air

quality.

Following negative impacts may occur during the construction works based or emerged

due to above mentioned possible conditions:

Exhaust gas and dust emerged during construction works of buildings and

facilities from used vehicles and heavy machinery may negatively affect the

quality of the air.

Earth/soil stripping works may cause soil erosion and can damage the soil layer.

Furthermore, dust may spread in the air, which may have environmental adverse

impacts due to increased dust level in the air.

Potential impacts emerged during construction works and operation, which may

negatively affect the air quality are summarized and assessed in the table below.

No. Impact/effect Assessment of consequence of the impact/effect

Very low

Or

Negligible

Low

Medium

High

Extreme

1

Increase of the airborne dust

level due to earth stripping

process, utilization of heavy

machinery and technical

equipment during construction

works

Х

2

Toxic fumes and gases

exhausted from heavy

machinery during

construction works may

negatively affect the quality

of the ambient air

Х

3

Emerged dust and toxic gases

may negatively affect the

working conditions in the area

and adversely affect the health

of employees

Х

Page 94: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

94

4

Due to the combustion process

and emerged CO (carbon

monoxide), HC (hydrocarbons),

NOx (nitrate and nitrite), SO2

(sulfur dioxide) and dust

emissions may negatively affect

the air quality

Х

5

Dust, toxic gases emerged due to

project activities may lay on the

earth surface and negatively

affect the vegetation and soil

quality

Х

6

Increased emission of poisonous

gas in the air composition may

change the precipitation and its

frequency

Х

Conclusion:

33% of the total impact is assessed as "very low" or "effect

less", whereas 66% of the total impact is assessed as "low". On

the base of the present data and evaluation the total impact of

the project on air quality shall be deemed as "low". The main

potential negative effects may emerge from toxic gases resulting

from the combustion of fuel specifications and can exceed

permitted level of applicable air quality standard.

Table 6-3 Impact on the weather quality and its assessment

6.2.2 Mitigation and elimination of the impacts on the climate and air quality

Construction and installation works of the facility and solar modules may increase the

amount of dust in the air. Therefore, in order to prevent dusting during the construction

and installation, applicable mitigation measures shall be taken. Special vehicles and

trucks for transportation of solar power plant equipment and construction materials shall

be used and gravel paved roads shall be sprayed with regular watering. No longer used

roads shall be closed after implementation of rehabilitation works.

Building materials, sand and mud shall be kept in suitable places and storages spaces.

Precaution measures shall be taken in order to prevent wind-blown dust.

After the completion of the construction works, areas without concrete pavement shall

be covered with gravel in order to prevent emerging of dust.

Technical equipment and heavy machinery shall be included in suitable technical

inspections and must fulfill applicable standards for exhaust emission. Technical

Page 95: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

95

equipment and heavy machinery shall be regularly inspected according to provisions of

technical services and maintenance.

Employees shall be included in regular health check-ups and if necessary provided with

special detoxification food and medication.

Vehicle exhaust pipes shall be equipped with special filters in order to suppress dust

generation by the combustion. Applicable technical procedures and rules must be

strictly followed by all means. Specification of the fuel, emissions of dust and the

amount of heavy metals must be considered during the selection of suitable

filters.Suitable fuel for technical equipment and heavy machinery must be used in order

to reduce the emission of nitrogen oxides and other harmful gases, fumes (CO2, CH4,

CFCs). Technical equipment and heavy machinery must be correctly adjusted and

configured.

6.3 Impact on the Geological condition and the mitigation measures

6.3.1 Impact on the geological condition

Currently, the project's land surface and entrails has no erosion or pollution. Pits and

drilling holes excavated for research and analysis purposes has been completely

backfilled in accordance with technical rehabilitation procedure.

Soil erosion and pollution may be caused due to human activity within the framework

of construction works of the Solar PV power plant and utilization of heavy machinery

and other technical equipment. It includes the surrounding area with supply roads

between the installed solar panels.

Small sized maintenance and repair shop shall be employed in order to maintain engines

and other equipment, technical devices, provision of the regular maintenance and

technical services to a variety of materials and spare parts, including fuel, oil reception,

storage and distribution. Thus, during their operation the earth surface and entrails may

be affected due to technical and human factors. This means that the particular area,

including its soil and vegetation, pastures and shrubs of natural habitats, species living

there, micro-organisms and ecology may be affected in a certain way.

6.3.2 Mitigation of the negative impact on the geological condition

Due to the impact it may cause to the surface and entrails during the construction

Page 96: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

96

process, earth stripping works and soil stockpile storage, restoration and re-vegetation,

preservation of the groundwater shall be executed and performed strictly in accordance

with applicable Mongolian rules, regulations and standards.

In addition, in order to protect the surface soil erosion trees, shrubs and planting

perennials shall be planted and cultivated to prevent soil erosion around the area as daily

duty. Due to works executed within the project arealiquid and solid waste pollution may

emerge in this relation. In consideration of household waste suitable toilets, garbage and

waste containers shall be installed in the project area. Latrines and drainage points shall

be installed downwind side of the settlement in accordance with the "Domestic waste

water disposal regulation".

6.4 Impact on the soil layer and the mitigation measures

6.4.1 Impact on the soil layer

The table below indicates the possible impacts on the soil and its severity during the

construction and operation of the PV power plant.

No. Impact/effect Assessment of consequence of the impact/effect

Very low or

Negligible

Low Medium High Extremely

dangerous

1 Soil of the project area can be damaged due to

soil erosion

Х

2 The project area can be damaged due to human

activity within the framework of construction

works of the Solar PV power plant and

utilization of heavy machinery and other

technical equipment.

Х

3 Sediments or hard particle dust containing NOx

and SOx may lay down on water and soil

surface and spread beyond the local flora and

fauna, which may havea negative impact

Х

4 Fuel and lubricant leakage, infiltration and soil

pollution

Х

Conclusion: Construction site to prevent soil erosion and 50% to 50%

of the total impact because there is little or very little effect

in that category.

Table 6-4 Assessment of the impact on the soil layer

Page 97: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

97

Some parts of the area are covered with thin sand. The particular area is affected

throughout the four seasons of the year by low and high speed winds. Therefore, the

surface of the soil is fertile brown soil blown and distributed nationwide, but is fed from

the corruption of compost plants.Thus, the low humus soil is less common and covered

mostly with gypsum, Borzon stone, rocks and pebble.

Concaves and cavities are covered mostly with brackish ponds and marsh soils in

addition to abundant piles of sand which may occasionally occur on the surface.

6.4.2 Mitigation and elimination of the negative impact on the soil layer

Environmental fertile soil, plants and livestock grazing of communities will be affected to

different extent during the construction, operation and decommissioning of the solar

project. However, the influence or impact is not such strong as in the mining sector.

A total of 80 hectares of the land area will be involved for the project, of which 64

hectares will be excavated.

Due to depletion of land reserves, excavation of the soil, the landscape shall be

changed in a certain way. It includes drilling holes and installation works of solar

panels and supporting piles, road stripes between panel rows and supporting facilities.

Certain parts of the soil and earth surface will be paved, clayed due to emerging of

land roads and pathways; soil disturbance may occur.

Following standards and instructions shall be strictly followed in order to reduce or

mitigate negative impacts on the soil cover:

MNS 4915:2000 Environment. Reclamation of land destroyed due to mining

activities. General technical requirements.

MNS 4917:2000 Environment. Requirements for fertile soil removing and its

temporary storage during the earth excavation. General technical requirements.

MNS 4919:2000 Environment. Re-vegetation of destroyed land. General technical

requirements.

MNS 4920:2000 Requirements for fertile soil removing and its temporary storage

during the earth excavation. General technical requirements.

Instructions for re-vegetation and restoration of the land impacted due to exploration

and research for minerals (Appendix 3 of the Resolution no. 64/А/62 of the Minister

for Environment and Agriculture from 2000)

It is important and essential to recover the used land area in proper and suitable

manner after implementation of the excavation and the completion of stockpiles

section and the side of the slope to ensure soil erosion protection.

Page 98: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

98

Land adjacent underground deposits kept and stored in piles for many years is often

one of the sources for soil pollution. Therefore rehabilitation measures shall be taken

as soon as possible in order to protect the vegetation.

Heavy contaminated soil with 50-70 cm in thickness shall be excavated, removed and

buried in a prepared earth hole/pit.

6.5 Impact on water bodies and mitigation measures

6.5.1 Impact on the water reserves, its quality and its assessment

The average groundwater mineralization of Gobi region is equal to 1120mg/liter, the

average hardness is 5.4mg-eq/liter, which is higher than the appropriate level of

drinking water. Drinking water of more than 100 soums of Gobi region does not fulfill

the standard requirements of which nearly 60 percent contains high level of

mineralization, nearly 40 percent of high hardness and is dominated by more than 80%

of magnesium hardness.

After commissioning of the Solar PV power plant in Sainshand estimated 10 technical

employees shall have permanent working place. In accordance with standard norms

approved through Resolution no. 153 of the Minister of Environment from 1995 one

person 15 liter water per day (10 * 15 * 350), which means annually 52500 liters or 52.5

m3 water. Drinking water is planned to be supplied and provided by water reservoir of

Sainshand city.

6.5.2 Mitigation of the impact on the water reserves and its quality

Mongolia is currently facing climate change, drought and desertification caused by

activity enlargements. In order to save natural resources and to mitigate the impact on the

current environment, lifestyle and farming so as to achieve sustainable economic growth,

the most appropriate and comfortable means should be determined to meet the needs of

life.

Ministry of Environment and Green Development of Mongolia adhere to environmental

policies to reduce water pollution, measures, implementation strategies and outcomes.

Contamination of water resources and sustainable conservation of the population use

planning ensures adequate water supply. The following strategies will be implemented:

Legal mechanisms on water conservation and sustainable use to improve the ratio of

water resource management and the organizational structure.

Enhance the availability of surface water circulation through the population and

Page 99: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

99

industrial water supply will be resolved.

Water quality, legal and economic mechanisms and management will be improved

through the implementation of following water protection strategies and measures:

Authorized hazardous waste disposal plant health inspection locations and employees

for one person from 1.2 - 2 m area with toilets shall be established with installed

hand-washing sinks and drying ovens.

Station for domestic waste water disinfection, neutralizing bio-oxidation facility.

Roads shall be built along the mountain chains with installed permanent and

temporary run-pass pipes during the spring flood, road barriers against rain water

storm and water facilities to dispose waste water in appropriate way;

Fuel and lubricants storage containers to prevent leakages,environment and

contaminated soil treatment and disposal measures;

Used waste water fees paid by the due date to be settled, and careful use of water

resources;

Workers to prevent loss of water as appropriate precautionary locations.

6.6 Impact of noise and mitigation measures

The solar power as a facility is not considered to exhibit any significant noisy

operations, although the facility‟s inverters and transformers may produce noise, but

this is not considered a serious issue, since they will not generate any significant noise.

Construction and decommissioning activities for solar power plant, however, will

contribute to noise impacts. There are several noise generating activities such as

opening access roads to construction personnel camp and facilities (if needed),

earthworks, haulage activities, excavation, backfilling, and installation of PV panels,

and other equipment within the facility in addition to noise sources generated from

machinery and equipment on site.

The closest community to the project area is the city of Sainshand which is

approximately 4 km away. Hence, it can be considered that the only people who could

potentially be impacted by the noise are the employees working within the project site;

these increased noise levels are considered occupational noises that require

occupational health and safety measures. In addition to this, some reptiles and

mammals, within the project area can potentially be driven away from the site due to

the sound levels. However, these noise impacts are not considered to significantly

harm animals nor cause impacts on a population level. Since the activities will occur

under normal operating conditions and are expected to have only localized and

temporary effects within the project area, the impact significance is low.

Page 100: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

100

6.7 Impact on visual amenity and mitigation measures

The construction activities that are likely to create a visual intrusion and a disruption

to aesthetics include: materials lay down, excavation, backfilling, and spoil. The

project site consists of areas that are sparsely vegetated or have no vegetative covers,

and hence no trees or bushes will need to be removed as part of construction. Also,

there are no close communities that would be within the visual radius of the project.

Therefore visual intrusions are anticipated to be limited to employees. Hence, the

visual effects of the construction will be of low significance within the project area.

The main impact during operation is the visual impact of the photovoltaic panels

during the day. The panels are geometric and reflective and will clearly stand out from

the surrounding natural landscape. This visual impact may be perceived as positive

and future-orientated rather than negative. The same has been seen for PV Power

Plants in other parts of the world.

Besides the presence of a large area of PV panels is not expected to constitute a risk

for glare since it is situated far from any airports, nor residential dwellings. Therefore,

it is not anticipated that visual impacts will be generated due to the PV system design.

6.8 Impact on Biodiversity and Mitigation measures

6.8.1 Impact on the flora and the mitigation measures

At the present time the project area is used as the pasture land by nomads and there are

no activities which are affecting negatively the particular area due to external factors.

Due to construction and installation works of the Solar PV power plant, the vegetation

cover can be destroyed.

Flammable and lubricating materials may contaminate the vegetation and change the

diversity of flora and fauna species. Building materials used by the construction of the

solar power plant, including equipment and transportation vehicles driving along the

road may contaminate the ground soil and vegetation.

Assessment of the project impact on the vegetation is shown in the table below.

Page 101: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

101

No.

Impact

Impact

intensity,

Probability scope

Very low or

Negligible

Low

Medium

High

Extremely

dangerous

1

May damage or

destroy the

vegetation within

the project area

Certainly Х Very likely

Likely

unlikely

Very unlikely

Vegetation within the

project area may

regress

Certainly

Very likely

likely Х

Unlikely

Very unlikely

2

Vicinity from

overgrazing of

the vegetation

within the

project area

Certainly Х

Very likely

Likely Unlikely

Very unlikely

3

Waste water impact

on the plant

community

Certainly

Very likely

Likely Х

Unlikely

Very unlikely

Impact of flammable

and lubricating

materials on the plant

community

Certainly

Very likely

likely Х

Unlikely

Very unlikely

Conclusion: The overall impact of the project on the vegetation within the project area

is classified as "low".

Table 6-5 Assessment of the project impact on the vegetation

Mitigation measures:

Soil erosion due to reduced soil moisture, structure damage and loss may influence the

favorable conditions for plant growth and this influence may result also in migration of

wild animals due to poor vegetation. Therefore, the following measures should be

taken:

The most optimal way to reduce the negative impact on vegetation is the optimal

choice of the connecting road for car traffic and regular monitoring and control.

Grade of planting according to appropriate technology and at the suitable time

in accordance with norms and standards and their performance in accordance

Page 102: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

102

and collaboration with argo-care professional organizations and units shall be

implemented following the previously projected schedule.

Vegetating of the surrounding area of the Power Plant is an important measure

and method to reduce the negative influence on vegetation, soil erosion,

desertification prevention, in order to reduce air pollution and mitigating climate

change.

Trees, bushes and shrubs planted perennials sprinkled flower beds shall be

planted in order to establish ornamental flower planting within and around the

project area.

Recorded species of plants, its categorization, documentation and long-term

monitoring plan will be coordinated with the competent authorities.

6.8.2 Impact on the fauna and the mitigation measures

Direct or indirect effects on plants or shortage of underground water resources are not

expected within the project implementation area or surroundings due to construction of

the Solar PV power plant and its later operation. But there is high risk of potential fuel

leak of the petrol distributing cars used in equipment transportation or construction

work; another risk is the indiscriminate release of household solid and liquid waste

which has an impact on temporary runoff pollution and groundwater layers.

No

.

Impact

Impact

intensity,

Scope

Probability

Very low or

Negligible

Low

Medium

High

Extremely

dangerous

1

Certain species of the

fauna may flee from their

habitat

Certainly Х

Very likely

Likely

unlikely

Very unlikely

2

Certain species of the fauna

may flee from their habitat or

extinct

Certainly Х

Very likely

Likely

unlikely

Very unlikely

3

Waste water impact on the

fauna of the project area

Certainly

Very likely Х

Likely

Unlikely

Very unlikely

Certainly

Page 103: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

103

4 Impact of flammable and

lubricating materials on the

fauna of the project area

Very likely

Likely

Unlikely Х

Very unlikely

5

Impact of the vibration

caused due to utilization of

heavy machinery and

technical equipment

Certainly

Very likely

Likely Х

Unlikely

Very unlikely

6

Hunting effects on the fauna

Certainly

Very likely

Likely

Unlikely

Very unlikely Х

Conclusion: The overall impact of the project on the fauna within the

project area is classified as "low".

Table 6-6 Assessment of the project impact on the fauna of the project area

Mitigation measures:

Mitigation and elimination of possible adverse impacts of a particular project shall be

implemented by individuals, business entities and organizations on human health and the

environment.

Protection of the biodiversity through national large-scaled protection programs of

wildlife and plants and other related activities shall be implemented in accordance with

applicable laws and regulations of Mongolia.

Construction, renovation and expansion of any existing production facilities, including

services and maintenance activities related to petroleum extraction, mining and building

construction or any other activities towards the use of natural resources may have

indirect or direct impact on the environment.

6.9 Impact on historical and cultural memorabilia and mitigation measures

There is no impact on historical and cultural memorabilia, because such historical and

cultural heritage or memorabilia was not discovered within the project area. In case of

discovery of historical and cultural heritage or memorabilia during the implementation

of construction works of the Solar PV power plant, necessary preservation and

Page 104: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

104

protection measures shall be taken in cooperation with provincial and local authorities,

including professional organizations.

6.10 Impact on the society and economy and mitigation measures

This section describes potential impacts of the project on socio-economic conditions

and amelioration of negative outcomes, aiming to protect the well-being of project

affected communities and to identify any potential enhancements to socio-economic

conditions.

Generally, the project will have either negligible or minor direct and indirect social and

economic effects on the local community and nomadic herders living in proximity to the

project area. These effects will commence during the construction and continue

throughout the operating life of the project. In short term, benefits will include

additional employment and expenditures associated with construction of the project.

These same types of benefits would accrue during operation. The overall socioeconomic

impacts of project implementation are discussed below.

6.10.1 Traffic

Construction Phase

During the Construction Phase traffic is expected to increase to a certain degree due to

the nature of activities that will take place such as the transport of equipment and

materials to and from the site through the surrounding road network. Additional traffic

load will be evident at certain times during the day, especially if there are slow moving

heavy vehicles transporting material to and from the site.

Vehicle traffic can cause congestion on road networks around and within the site and

thereby leading to potential accidents.

The above potential traffic impacts can possibly occur during the duration of

construction, especially during working hours. However, this is considered a short-term

impact. This impact is likely to happen but is not anticipated to cause any permanent

effect on the receiving environment. Besides due to the fact that the proposed PV site is

located around 4 km away from the eastern end of Sainshand, this temporary

disturbance is reduced to a minimum. The construction period is expected to be 3-5

months.

Page 105: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

105

Operation Phase

Impacts from traffic are not expected to occur during the operation phase due to

minimal number of personnel present within the project site. Therefore, increased traffic

load is not considered a significant impact. As a result, the impact is very low.

Decommissioning Phase

The anticipated impacts during decommissioning are similar to those for the

construction phase, where the heavy machinery that transports disassembled parts of the

project solar power plant facility might be of more significance than normal vehicles

and pickups. Proper management actions with adequate mitigations can reduce

significantly such anticipated impacts.

6.10.2 Employment Opportunities

Construction and Operation Phases

Positive benefits of the project may arise either from short-term job opportunities during

construction, or long-term job opportunities during operation. It is important that

construction and operation jobs to be targeted to the local people within Sainshand city

where feasible.

Moreover, DSP One LLC plays a significant role in the training and employment

process since it is considered a one-stop-shop for investors who can obtain potential

candidates through DSP One LLC according to their need. Furthermore the PV Power

Plant enables Mongolian universities and their students to gain hands-on experience in

energy production from large scale PV Power Plants.As a result, the impact significance

can be considered Positive (+).

Decommissioning Phase

Short-term job opportunities may arise during decommissioning, however, this can

negatively impact permanent personnel at the solar power plant since the facility will

cease its operations, therefore permanent staff may lose their jobs.

However given the fact that an upgrade is expected for the facility during its post –

design life, the significance of the impact is considered low.

Page 106: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

106

6.10.3 Economy

The project is anticipated to have benefits to society since the use of photovoltaic Power

Plants in Mongolia is not widespread currently. Implementations of such technology are

able to increase the awareness of this alternative electricity generation and could lead to

an increased market share in future. It will also provide a clean and pollution free

energy and as a result, improve public health.

On a more strategic level, it will increase the supply of electrical energy in Mongolia

from a renewable source, which is in line with the aim of the Mongolian government to

increase energy supply and reduce the overall CO2 emissions of Mongolia by

substituting energy from the predominating coal-fired Power Plants.

The solar project will also lead to upgrading the economic status of the local community

in addition to potential increase in land prices and improvement in welfare conditions in

the long run. Therefore, this impact is considered to be Positive (+).

6.10.4 Human Health

6.10.4.1 Safety Risks from Traffic

Vehicle traffic, particularly HGVs, will increase as a direct result of the construction

phase of the project and this can present a risk of accidents that could result from minor

injury to serious injury or death. This could be a negative impact that will be localized

and in short term, occurring during the construction and decommissioning phase.

Mitigation measures

To mitigate the potential traffic related impacts from the project, a traffic management

plan comprising strategies to manage vehicles and equipment during the execution of

the project will be implemented, including the following measures:

Provide appropriate traffic safety training to all drivers (employees and

contractors) as part of their induction and on an ongoing basis.

As part of pre-construction engagement activities, ensure that traffic and “rules

of the road” are discussed with local communities. Discuss and address

community concerns. Special sessions may be required for particularly

vulnerable groups such as children. At minimum communicate type, frequency

and traffic risks before heavy traffic begins for the construction phase.

Page 107: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

107

Use grievance mechanism or other means to monitor the driver conduct.

6.10.4.2 Increased Risks to Personal Safety from Population Influx

Increased risks to community safety and security are likely as a result of influx of

workers and other individuals to the area as posing a threat to security,primarily in

relation to their property and potential unruly or destructive behavior.

6.10.4.3 Injury or death from construction activities and unforeseen events

Risks to community health from construction activities such as accidents, chemicals

releases or such are low provided the community or their livestock does not trespass

within the construction area, particularly the WTG foundation excavations.

6.11.4.4 Respiratory effects from poor air Quality

Construction activity will result in fugitive dust. It will be generated by vehicle traffic

on unpaved roads, naturally occurring windblown dust from disturbed lands and dust

generated during construction activities.

Impacts will vary depending on the construction activity and the severity of most air

related impacts reduce with distance from the source. Fugitive dust will have the

greatest potential impact on local herder residents within site boundary, especially

during dry periods when there is heavy truck traffic. This could result in respiratory

impacts for the local community, ranging from minor irritation of the throat, eyes, nose

to chronic irritation, asthma and other respiratory effects.

Unmitigated respiratory effects from construction activities would be direct, negative

impacts that are localized but short to medium term. With mitigation these effects would

become localized and minor.

Mitigation of Respiratory Effects from Poor Air Quality

To mitigate the potential air quality related impacts from project activities, particularly

during construction, the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

Implementation and compliance with a traffic management plan which should

identify the strategies used to manage dust on the road during the execution of

the project.

Implementation and compliance with the Dust Management Plan(part of the

Page 108: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

108

overall ESMP).

Use of properly maintained vehicles and construction equipment with emission

controls.

Communicate project risk to local communities and address concerns

accordingly. Monitor any complaints filed from local stakeholders as an

additional tool to monitor dust management measures.

6.10.4.5 Spread of food and water-borne diseases

Population influx and increased project waste and effluents will increase pressure on

local waste management and sanitation services and infrastructure. The results could be

unplanned settlements, or increased crowding in existing settlements, increasing the

likelihood of illnesses from fecal-oral contamination. The spread of food and water-

borne diseases will be localized and medium term as there is a potential that it may

continue beyond the construction phase.

Mitigation measures:

To mitigate the potential spread of food and water-borne disease related impacts from

the project, the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

Implementation of Waste Management Plan, to make sure that household and

project waste is disposed in accordance with relevant Mongolian standards;

Implementation of a Camp Management and Security Management Plan to

ensure the workers‟ access to a safe and healthy work and living environment.

6.10.4.6 Occurrence and Spread of Communicable Disease

The rapid increase in population, especially male workforces, increases the risk of

occurrence of communicable diseases. Close living conditions, poor water quality and

sanitation can increase the risk of respiratory disease, as well as food and water-borne

diseases, which will be an indirect negative impact, however is local and short to

medium term.

Mitigation measures

To mitigate the potential occurrence and spreading of communicable diseases related to

the project, the following mitigation measures will be adopted:

Make sure the health screening is conducted for employees both before their

employment and throughout the contract period on an irregular basis;

Increase awareness on communicable disease prevention by providing training

Page 109: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

109

on communicable disease prevention on a regular basis; collaborate with an on-

site medical team to make sure such training is properly provided;

Seek opportunities to support local public health campaigns that focus on

preventing communicable diseases.

6.10.4.7 Increased pressure on water resources

To reduce the impacts on local water quality due to the project implementation, the

following mitigation measures will be adopted:

Make sure that all employees and workers abide by the code of conduct that the

community wells should not be used.

Monitor the compliance through the grievance mechanism to be put in place.

6.10.4.8 Risk to Human health from untreated sewage effluent

The following mitigation measures will be adopted to reduce the potential impacts from

the untreated sewage effluent due to the project:

Implementation of a detailed Waste Management Plan.

A local effluent collection or treatment system will be put in place in accordance

with Mongolian Law.

Effluent from domestic sewage treatment shall meet relevant standards issued by

Mongolian Ministry of Environment.

6.10.4.9 Increased risks to the safety of local community

The following mitigation measures will be adopted to reduce the potential security

related impacts from the project:

Make sure that project security is aware of the project‟s goals to establish good

relationships with local stakeholders; put in place the grievance mechanism for

communities to speak out their concerns

Develop a conduct code for security personnel, who outlines appropriate

conduct, engagement and use of force and make sure all security personnel fully

informed and abide by it.

Introduce head of security personnel to neighboring communities and outline the

necessary safety precautions that will need to be put in place to ensure the safety

of the project and local communities.

Page 110: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

110

6.10.4.10 Injury from Construction Activities

There would be no issues relating to infrastructure safety exposure to diseases,

hazardous material or increased exposure to natural hazards. The likelihood and severity

of adverse impacts is considered low in terms of the risk identified and there will be

management plan in place to further mitigate those risks.

To avoid work injuries, the following measures are to be taken:

Keep project plant and equipment to pre-defined routes and areas. Use

appropriate signage;

Inform the local communities that they should not enter the construction area

6.10.4.11 Emergency preparedness and response

The increase in HGV traffic and the potential injuries resulted from the project could

lead to an increased pressure on the emergency response system. This is an indirect

negative impact, which is localized and medium term. To mitigate the risk of severe

injury or death from emergency events such as equipment or machinery accidents, the

following measures will be adopted:

Develop an emergency response plan(ERP)

Communicate ERP with local emergency responders; build local capacity to

ensure appropriate local response in case of emergency.

Communicate potential risks and ERP to those potentially most affected by

emergency events.

6.10.4.12 Increased pressure on health services and infrastructure

Project activities will result in an increase of non-resident population and workforce,

which in turn could increase pressure on local health services and infrastructure. The

impacts of the project on health care infrastructure will depend on the size of locally

registered force. The impact will be an indirect negative impact, which will be localized

and medium term.

Mitigation measures

To mitigate the potential pressure on health services resulting from population influx,

the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

Ensure that all Contractors are provided with adequate health care (for work-

related injuries and off the job related health issues) that is independent of the

Page 111: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

111

local health care system.

Identify ways together with local professionalsin which the project can provide

sustainable investments in the health care facilities used by their workers.

6.10.5 Occupational and Public Health and Safety

This section introduces the potential impacts of the project on occupational and

community health and safety. Occupational and public health and safety concerns

associated with operation and construction of the project will be similar to those from

construction and operation of any industrial facility in a remote area. The major

potential hazards include:

Movement or operation of passenger and construction vehicles,equipment, and

materials could cause injury or death to humans(drivers, passengers, pedestrians)

or animals(livestock or wildlife).

Using hand tools or larger equipment could result in accidents that harm or kill

workers.

Falling overhead objects could cause injury or death to workers or trespassers.

Falls into or collapse of open excavations could cause injury or death to workers

or trespassers.

Falls from heights (buildings, transmission towers, WTGs) could cause injury or

death to workers or trespassers.

Blasting could cause injury or death to workers or trespassers.

Contact with electrical lines or transformers could cause injury or death to

workers or trespassers.

Noise and vibration could distress or injure workers or distress residents.

Mitigation Measures

DSP and its contractors will comply with International Occupational Health& Safety

regulations and standards in addition to Mongolian safety standards regarding

construction works, electric works, structural climbing and other hazards. In general,

construction operations will be planned and implemented in accordance with these

standards and with IFC safety guidelines (2007a).

There will be a workforce manager in charge of all activities, and in charge of

compliance with health and safety requirements. He/she will report directly to the project

manager and will have independent lines of reporting to the upper management. Before

the on-site work, the workforce manager will develop a safety program to cover

construction and later the operation. The program will describe the potential hazards and

the ways to prevent or avoid them. All construction workers, including contractors will be

Page 112: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

112

required to complete a training program that covers the safety program, and training will

cover hazard awareness, job- and site-specific hazards, emergency procedures for fire and

for illness or injury and natural disaster.

Besides training, the safety program will include detailed requirements for inspecting,

testing, and calibrating safety equipment, for monitoring the working environment for

hazards, and for monitoring worker health. In addition, all incidents and accidents will be

recorded if they results, or nearly resulted, in damage to equipment or injury or to humans

or animals.DSP will report to the lender on the status of the overall safety program,

including information on training and on incidents. In addition, DSP will compensate

herders for livestock that may be killed as a result of site-related traffic. With regard to

the construction workforce, a local labor force will be employed and wages will be paid

which are at least average for the area.

6.11 Impacts of Power Transmission Line

6.11.1Technical Characteristics of the Overhead Line (OHL)

The planned power transmission line from the PV-Power station to the substation will

meet all required regulations in Mongolia.

Towers

The design of the towers must ensure safe operation in all working climatic conditions, in

relation to the used phase conductors, earth wires and insulator sets and for the designed

wind and weight spans.

Depending on their position in the OHL, the types of towers could be: Suspension towers,

used for straight section of the line or Angle (tension) towers, used where the line

changes direction.

The towers will be steel lattice design. Each tower will have four legs and single

foundation per leg, i.e. four foundations for each tower. Number of conductors and their

disposition on each tower type is three lines in horizontal direction, each with two phase

conductors and two lines in horizontal direction with two earth wire conductors.

Foundations

The tower foundations will be undercut pad and chimney type constructed of reinforced

concrete. The type of concrete should provide conditions for placing normal foundations

and should be suitable to the specific carrying capacity of the terrain. In case of weak

carrying capacity of the terrain at certain micro-locations and based on geo-technical

investigations, relevant specific technical solutions will be designed and constructed.

Page 113: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

113

Earthlings

In the context of safety and protection at work (reducing the effects from electric shock,

etc.) special emphasis will be given to the tower earthling. This procedure should be

conducted in compliance with the requirements of the technical regulations.

Earthling of OHL towers will consist of two rings around each tower foundation, made

from FeZn wire Ø 10 mm. These rings are connected between them and to the tower steel

structure. In cases when earthling needs to be reinforced (e.g. for types of soil with lower

conductivity), reinforcement is done by adding two legs (extensions) from FeZn wire or

FeZn tapes to existing rings on each tower foundation. Finally, for sites with special

earthling requirements (in principal case – near buildings or houses), additional FeZn

wire ring is laid around entire tower structure, roughly 1 m away from existing rings and

at depth of 0.8 to 1.0 m.

Phase Conductors

For the phase conductors for the planned OHL, pursuant to the current concept for this

type of power lines in Mongolia, conductors ACSR will be used with normal cross

section of 490/65 mm2. Two conductors per phase are planned at a mutual distance of

more than 400 mm.

Insulators

The proposed OHL will belong to the grid with a directly grounded neutral point and a

degree of insulation for which the nominated lightning impulse withstands voltage is

1,425 kV. The insulator that is to be used will be of a type approved for such power lines

and appropriate assembling procedures will be carried out for the various types of

insulator chains.

6.11.2 Construction Works for the OHL

Transportation means used to transport towers to the construction sites mainly depend on

the terrain conditions. In general, trucks or heavy tractors will be used. No use of

helicopters for construction purposed is planned.

Use of existing access roads to tower location will be preferred. Thus, a combination of

access options will be used, using existing roads and tracks to allow access to

construction sites wherever possible and constructing new tracks where necessary. Roads

for construction access will be prepared using standard road construction heavy

machinery, mainly – bulldozers, by upgrading existing roads in order to accommodate

construction needs and buildings new access roads. Once construction is completed it is

intended to maintain access roads to enable maintenance activities. Any other access road

disturbed by construction activities will be improved to better condition in comparison to

its original stage.

Page 114: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

114

6.11.3 Access to Construction Sites of the OHL

Access to the works would be gained wherever feasible from the existing main road

network. The use of certain unclassified roads would also be required. Those unclassified

roads which may be used would be identified in subsequent project stages and during

preparation of the project‟s main technical design.

A combination of access options would need to be considered including making best use

of existing roads and tracks as well as new temporary and permanent tracks to allow

access to construction sites with the least environmental impact.

The overall operational life of the proposed OHL is approximately 20 years matching the

operational life of the solar power park, however the OHL would be technically viable for

a period of 70 years. The eventual final termination of operations will involve activities

for dismantling the infrastructure and equipment and their dislocation from the area of the

corridor of the OHL. The location will be subject of restoration and returning the

environment to its original condition.

6.11.4 Impacts and mitigation measures on Archaeology and Cultural

Heritage

There are no known archaeological sites, heritage sites, or large cemeteries located within

the route of the OHL corridor.

During the construction works, the works contractor shall be obliged to develop and

implement a “chance-find” procedure and to comply with national legislation on the

protection of cultural heritage. Workers will be trained in the use of these procedures.

If an archaeological site or items of archaeological significance are found during

execution of construction works, the work contractor / investor is obliged to:

(i) Inform immediately the competent public institution for protection of cultural heritage

about the discovery (ii) Cease operations and to secure the site against eventual any

damaging and against unauthorized access, and (iii) Maintain the uncovered items in the

location and in condition they were found.

With the implementation of the proposed chance find procedure we do not anticipate any

significant residual impacts.

6.11.5 Impacts and mitigation measures on Air Quality

6.11.5.1 Dust and Particulate Matter during Construction Activities

During the construction of the proposed 35 kV OHL, there will be site preparation and

Page 115: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

115

construction activities, all of which have the potential to generate dust. Such emissions

can be divided into dust and particulate matter (PM10).

Dust comprises of large airborne particles of material, which are resident in the

atmosphere for short periods of time after release, as they are heavy enough to fall out of

suspension in the air relatively quickly. Therefore, effects of these emissions will be

localized and they do not cause long-term or wide spread changes to local air quality but

their deposition on nearby properties causes soiling and may therefore result in

complaints of nuisance, which is usually temporary.

The main sources of dust during the construction activities include:

• Construction vehicle movements and other project related traffic on unpaved roads

• Soil excavation, handling, storage, stockpiling

• Site preparation and restoration after completion

• Construction of towers and access roads

• Internal and external construction works on substations.

The majority of the dust emissions are likely to occur during the working hours of

construction activity.

The precise behavior of the dust, its presence in the atmosphere, and the distance it may

reach would depend upon a number of factors. These include wind direction and strength,

local topography and the presence of screening structures (buildings, trees etc.) that may

intercept dust before it reaches sensitive locations. Each of these factors would differ

along the route of the proposed OHL.

Depending on wind speed and turbulence during construction it is likely that the majority

of dust will be deposited in the area immediately surrounding the source (up to 200 m

away). Therefore properties within 200 m of the construction site are most likely to

experience nuisance, without appropriate mitigation measures. However, the nuisance

would be temporary, and provided that site specific mitigation measures are implemented,

no significant dust effects are predicted.

6.11.5.2 Emissions from Traffic

The main pollutants of concern associated with road traffic are NO2, PM10, CO, benzene

(C6H6) and benzo[a]pyrene (C20H12). Of these pollutants, NO2 and PM10 are the

emissions most likely to result in exceeding relevant air quality standards or objectives.

The greatest potential for impacts on air quality from traffic associated with construction

of the proposed project would be in the areas immediately adjacent to the principal means

of access for construction traffic. In construction zones, the dust generated by vehicle

movements and local air pollutant emissions from vehicles may be temporarily elevated

during the busiest periods of construction activity, however, given the relatively remote

and open nature of much of the OHL route, no significant local air quality effects are

Page 116: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

116

predicted.

Air emissions during operation of the proposed OHL will be minor and only occur during

routine inspections and maintenance activities.

6.11.6 Noise and Vibration

The Mongolian standard MNS-4585-2007 has permitted noise limits of 60 dB(A) during

daytime, and 45 dB(A) at night. However the WHO provide a more stringent standard of

55 dB(A) and 45 dB(A) which will be applied to this project.

6.11.6.1Construction noise

In a general context, construction activities could be divided into a number of distinct

processes. They may be described as follows:

• Construction of tower foundations

• Tower assembly and erection

• Attachment of the conductors

• General road improvements and other similar works.

Based on available project information, there are no blasting requirements during the

construction process. Noise and vibration effects associated with blasting are therefore

not expected during construction activities. However, any eventual requirement for

blasting will be agreed in advance by the EPC contractor with the relevant local authority.

There are no plans to use helicopters during construction activities and, therefore no noise

implications associated with helicopters are expected. However, any eventual

requirement for use of helicopter would make noise audible to people within 2 km. The

duration of the noise would be short-term, on the order of minutes to an hour, and over a

very limited number of days.

Mechanical equipment which is planned to be involved in the construction of the

proposed 35 kV OHL includes, but is not limited to: track loader, excavator, hydraulic

hammer and breaker, mobile crane, air compressor, dump trucks, generators, concrete

pump, etc.

6.11.6.2 Construction vibrations

Planned construction activities and use of equipment and machinery will be a source of

vibration. The response of people to vibrations on the ground is influenced by many

factors. Some of those factors are physical, like amplitude, duration and frequency

content of vibrations, while other factors like the type of population, age, gender and

expectations are physiological. This means that people's reaction to vibrations is

subjective and differs for different people. It is generally accepted that for the majority of

people, vibration levels in excess of between 0.15 and 0.3 mm/s peak particle velocity are

Page 117: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

117

just perceptible. Previous studies have shown that vibration tends to be perceptible at

distances of up to 15 m from the source.

6.11.6.3 Operational Noise

An operational OHL can be a source of a phenomenon known as "corona discharge" (a

limited electrical insulation breakdown of the air) which can also occur naturally during

storms when highly charged clouds induce high electric fields around tall objects.

Whilst the conductor systems of overhead OHLs are designed and constructed to

minimize corona and hence acoustic noise, surface irregularities on the conductors,

caused by physical damage such as burrs, or debris such as insects, pollen, industrial

pollution, raindrops or other forms of contamination, may locally enhance the electric

field strength sufficiently for discharges to occur.

Any corona discharge would act as a source of audible noise i.e. a crackling sound

occasionally accompanied by a low frequency hum in certain wet conditions.

Corona noise is generated only when the conductor surface electric stress exceeds the

inception level for corona discharge activity. The OHL conductors are designed to

operate below this threshold. Surface contamination of a conductor, resulting in a

modification to its otherwise smooth profile, would cause a very local enhancement of

electric stress that may initiate discharge activity. At each discharge site, a limited

electrical breakdown of the air occurs. A proportion of the energy associated with the

corona process is released as acoustic energy, which is launched into the air as sound

pressure waves.

Highest noise levels generated by an OHL generally occur during rain. Water droplets

collect on the surface of the conductor and may initiate additional corona discharges. Fog

may also give rise to increased noise levels.

Fog noise is caused by droplets of water condensing onto the line and hence causing

discharge activity in a similar way to rain.

Operational noise generated by an OHL increases noise levels in the surrounding

environment and may cause nuisance to affected populations. The high variability in the

response of individuals to identical noise sources makes the prediction of annoyance very

difficult. Each individual's response to increased noise levels is subjective and highly

personal.

OHL audible noise is generally categorized as "crackle" or "hum", according to its tonal

content. Crackle may occur alone, but hum would usually occur only in conjunction with

crackle. Hum is only likely to occur during rain when rates of rainfall exceed 1mm/hr.

Crackle is a “broad band” noise containing a random mixture of frequencies, typically

ranging from 1 kHz to 10 kHz.

Page 118: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

118

6.12 Summary of Cumulative Impacts

This section investigates the cumulative impacts which could result from the existing

and/or planned projects in the area based on the current available information.

Within the project area and its surrounding there are no existing and/or planned

developments which would result in cumulative impacts on any of the environmental or

social receptors investigated as part of the ESIA. The natures of the potential impacts

which have been addressed above are site-specific and relevant mitigation measures will

be adopted. This includes impacts such as land use, geology and hydrology, biodiversity,

archeology and cultural heritage, air quality, infrastructure and utilities, and occupational

health and safety. The assessment of cumulative impacts in that sense is not relevant.

Page 119: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

119

CHAPTER 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL

MANAGEMENT PLAN

7.1 Introduction

The project developer is committed to achieving and maintaining environmental

standards, such that Mongolia environmental regulations are met, and potential adverse

environmental impacts resulting from the project activities are minimized as practicably

as possible. This will be achieved through appropriate project planning and methods of

project operation.

Implementation of on-going environmental monitoring programs will enable the

assessment and modification, if required, of the Environmental Management program.

Further to the impacts assessed in the previous chapter, this section presents more

detailed mitigation measures and monitoring requirements that correspond to the impacts

examined in the previous section, thus exploring them in more detail. Mitigation

measures aim to offset any negative impacts that may result from the project, and

monitoring is the process of measuring the success of mitigation measures in order to

assess their effectiveness.

7.2 Objectives

This Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) aims at ensuring the

application of the mitigation and monitoring measures needed to reduce and control the

various environmental and social impacts associated with the implementation of the

proposed project.

The key objectives of the ESMP are summarized below:

Minimizing any adverse environmental, social and health impacts resulting from

the project activities;

Conducting all project activities in accordance with relevant Mongolian

legislation and applicable EBRD guidelines.

Implementation of on-going environmental monitoring programs;

Periodic review of the Environmental Management programs to allow for iterative

improvement;

Ensure that all stakeholder concerns are addressed.

Overall, this ESMP aims at ensuring the application of the mitigation and monitoring

measures needed to reduce and control the various environmental and social impacts

associated with the implementation of the proposed project.

Page 120: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

120

7.3Environmental and Social Management Plan for this project

Depending on the nature of the project, the current plan was made for every 5 years

beginning from 2016. The plan shall be updated, reviewed and approved every year by

the Ministry of Environment and local authorities.

Before the 15th of February of each year the environmental protection plan and

environmental monitoring program shall be updated as detailed case review and

approved as environmental assessment by the Ministry of Environment from revoking

the Ministry of project implementation plan every year, as verified during the program

Performance report.

Page 121: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

121

ESMP for Planning and Construction Phase

Environmental

Attribute

Potential Impact Impacted

Objects

Management Action and

Compensation Measures

Type of

Action

Monitoring

Action

Frequency Responsible

Entity

Standard

Permission Level

Landscape and

Visual

The construction

activities are

likely to create a

visual intrusion

and a disruption

to aesthetics

including

materials lay

down, excavation,

backfilling and

spoil.

All

employees of

the facility,

community

members and

visitors.

Ensure proper housekeeping and

instruct the workforce accordingly. It

should be ensured that all machines,

vehicles and tools used during

construction should be removed on the

earliest time possible, waste is

collected and evacuated in a timely

manner and the project site is left in an

orderly state after each working day.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable norms

and standards of

Mongolia.

Soil Soil erosion and

pollution may be

caused due to

human activity

within the

framework of

construction

works of the

Solar PV power

plant and

utilization of

heavy machinery

and other

technical

equipment.

Livestock,

pastures,

fertile soil,

animals and

plants may be

impacted.

Due to the impact it may cause to the

surface and entrails during the

construction process, earth stripping

works and soil stockpile storage,

restoration and re-vegetation and

preservation of the groundwater shall

be executed and performed strictly in

accordance with applicable Mongolian

rules, regulations and standards.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Ministry of

Environment, the

Minister of

Energy, ratified

on May 6, 1989,

22 68 / A / 61,

Annex 5.

MNS 4915:2000,

MNS 4917:2000,

MNS 4919:2000,

MNS 4920:2000,

Resolution no.

64/А/62

Implement a proper waste management

plan. Make sure that no solid waste is

being dumped on the land and

distribute sufficient numbers of bins

and containers with respective

labeling. Ensure that such containers

are emptied or collected by respective

contractors in a timely manner in order

to prevent overflowing. Further,

instruct the local workforce to keep the

produced amount of waste at a

minimum level by for example reusing

materials where possible. Keep track

of the produced volume of waste

generated onsite and compare with the

amount collected by the contractor to

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 122: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

122

prevent illegal dumping.

In addition, in order to protect the

surface soil erosion, trees, shrubs and

perennials shall be planted and

cultivated to prevent soil erosion

around the area.

Mitigation Installment Continuous EPC

Contractor

In consideration of household waste

suitable toilets, garbage and waste

containers shall be installed in the

project area. Latrines and drainage

points shall be installed downwind side

of the settlement in accordance with

the "Domestic waste water disposal

regulation".

Mitigation Installment Once,

construction

planning

EPC

Contractor

Hazardous materials shall be stored in

appropriate areas and it needs to be

ensured that they do not contact land in

case of spillage. (Impermeable surface,

accessible only by authorized

personnel, etc.).

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Ensure regular maintenance of all

equipment and machinery used onsite.

If there is a risk of hazardous material

spillage during such maintenance, such

maintenance shall take place on

suitable locations to prevent spilling on

the land. Further, dripping pans shall

be installed on machinery which is

likely to leak hazardous materials such

as oil and fuel.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Construction and municipal solid and

liquid waste fixed-point shall gain

temporary disinfection and there

should be a specific day determined

each month to remove the

contaminated area. Heavy

contaminated soil with 50-70 cm in

thickness shall be excavated, removed

and buried in a prepared earth hole/pit.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 123: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

123

Soil sampling and Environment

monitoring shall be reviewed during

the test program for the period

specified (Soil quality assurance shall

be reviewed once a year. Professional

examination of the soil quality and

level of the contamination shall be

performed twice a year).

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Water and Waste

Water

Management

Improper

Management of

Water and

Wastewater.

People,

biodiversity

Mechanisms on water conversation

and sustainable use of water in order to

improve the ratio of water resource

management and reduce the total water

usage. Workers shall be instructed to

prevent the loss of water.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Joint resolution

of State Minister

for Environment

and State

Minister for

Health and Social

Welfare, Rules

and Procedures

for Protection of

Water Reserves,

No.143/A/352

from 1997 shall

be taken as

guidance and

instruction for

mentioned

activities.

Environmental

certificate of

authorization

procedure are not

currently

available.

Authorized hazardous waste disposal

plant in order to avoid pollution of

ground water. Install fuel and

lubricants storage containers and

prevent leakages.

Mitigation Installment Continuous EPC

Contractor

Install water facilities to dispose waste

water in an appropriate way. Ensure

that waste water containers are emptied

and collected by wastewater contractor

regularly and pay waste water fee by

due date.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Analysis of the use of ground water

supplied from environmental

inspection and testing program in

appropriate periods.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Measures to mitigate the influence

from torrential rain and runoff from

rainfall and flooding should be

considered in the planning. Installment

of temporary and permanent run-pass

pipes during spring flood and road

barriers against rain water storm where

necessary.

Mitigation Reviewing

EPC contract,

Planning

Once,

construction

planning

Project

Developer

Flora Construction

activities could

disturb and harm

existing flora.

Implement management measures to

prevent damage to the flora on the site.

This may include establishing a code

of behavior and ensure the awareness

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 124: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

124

of local workforce and other involved

people.

Take existing flora in consideration

when planning connecting roads for

car traffic and regular monitoring and

control.

Mitigation Inspection Once,

construction

planning

EPC

Contractor

Flora shall be replanted within and

around the project area. Grade of

planting according to appropriate

technology and at a suitable time in

accordance with norms and standards

and in collaboration with professionals.

Mitigation Inspection Once,

construction

planning

EPC

Contractor

Ensure that flammable and lubricating

materials are used in a suitable way

and avoid negative impacts on the

flora.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Fauna Construction

activities could

disturb and harm

existing fauna.

Conduct survey about the existing

fauna in the project areas including its

habits as breeding, feeding and

movement. The study shall be

executed by professionals and shall

include winter as well as summer

season. Thereby, project area shall not

be limited to the project site but also to

the area around and the transmission

line.

Mitigation Survey Once,

construction

planning

EPC

Contractor

with project

developer

Use construction material that impacts

the observed habits of the local fauna

as little as possible.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Leave small holes in the fences in

order to allow small animals to escape

the project site and avoid affecting

their natural movements.

Mitigation Installment

and Planning

Once,

construction

planning

EPC

Contractor

Implement management measures to

prevent damage to the fauna on the

site. Establish awareness of the local

workforce concerning the exiting fauna

and avoid hunting.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

and Project

Operator

Page 125: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

125

Take existing flora in consideration

when planning connecting roads for

car traffic and regular monitoring and

control.

Mitigation Inspection Once,

construction

planning

EPC

Contractor

Ensure that flammable and lubricating

materials are used in a suitable way

and avoid negative impacts on the

flora.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Archeology and

Cultural Heritage

Disturbance of

historical and

cultural

memorabilia

through certain

construction

activities.

Objects of

historical and

cultural

importance

Until now there was no historical and

cultural heritage or memorabilia

discovered within the project area. In

case of discovery of historical and

cultural heritage during the

implementation of construction works

of the solar PV power plant, necessary

preservation and protection measures

shall be taken in cooperation with

provincial and local authorities,

including professional organizations.

Mitigation Inspection Once,

construction

planning

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable norms

and standards of

Mongolia.

Construction activities should be

halted in the case of such founding.

The respective areas should be fenced

and the responsible authorities should

be informed. The construction in the

area should not be continued until

relevant experts and authorities have

been consulted, appropriate mitigation

measures are implemented and it is

ensured that the historical and cultural

memorabilia is not affected by such

proceeding. Construction on other

areas of the project site where no such

founding was made can be continued.

Mitigation Inspection Upon

occurrence

EPC

Contractor

Air Quality Construction and

installation works

may affect the

amount of dust in

the air and pollute

the environment.

Construction

and ambient

air in the

vicinity

involving

humans,

animals,

plants, and

The increased amount of dust in the air

during construction shall be minimized

by using adequate equipment. Special

vehicles and trucks for transportation

of solar power plant equipment shall

be used and such trucks shall be

covered when transporting fine and

dusty materials outside the project

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

• Air quality

indicators MNS

4585: 98

• Air quality in

urban areas with

the maximum

content of

chemicals

Page 126: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

126

on-site

employees.

location.

Gravel paved roads shall be spread

with watering if necessary during dry

times and speed limits shall be

conducted on the construction site in

order to minimize dust emerging from

the roads.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

After the completion of the

construction works, areas without

concrete pavement shall be covered

with gravel in order to prevent

emerging of dust.

Mitigation Installment Once,

during

construction

EPC

Contractor

Building materials, sand and mud shall

be kept in suitable places and storages

spaces. Precaution measures shall be

taken in order to prevent wind-blown

dust.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Technical equipment and heavy

machinery shall be included in suitable

technical inspections and must fulfill

applicable standards for emissions.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Vehicle exhaust pipes shall be

equipped with special filters in order to

suppress dust generation. Applicable

technical procedures and rules must be

strictly followed by all means.

Specification of the fuel, emissions of

dust and the amount of heavy metals

must be considered during the

selection of suitable filters. Suitable

fuel for technical equipment and heavy

machinery must be used in order to

reduce the emission of nitrogen oxides

and other harmful gases and fumes

(CO2, CH4, CFCs). Technical

equipment and heavy machinery must

be correctly adjusted and configured.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 127: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

127

Implementation and compliance with a

traffic management plan.

Transportation shall be managed in an

efficient way to reduce the overall

usage of transportation vehicles.

Where possible, train workers shall

handle construction materials and

debris during construction to reduce

fugitive emissions.

Mitigation Planning and

Inspection

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Visual monitoring of the dust

emissions shall be performed during

earthworks and construction activities.

The pollutant emissions shall be

continuously measured during the

construction and if there are extensive

levels of air pollution being measured

the sources of such pollution shall be

identified and adequate measures shall

be implemented. Communicate project

risk to local community and address

concerns accordingly.

Mitigation Inspection Upon

occurrence

EPC

Contractor

Ensure that for activities that contain

high levels of dust, the workers are

equipped with proper protective

equipment. Employees shall be

included in regular health check-ups

and if necessary provided with special

detoxification medication.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Noise Several noise

generating

activities during

the construction

such as

earthworks,

haulage activities,

excavation and

installation of PV

panels will have

an impact on the

noise level

around the project

All

employees

and workers

on site.

Measures to reduce noise level of

technical equipment shall be taken.

Therefore, technical equipment with

adequate noise levels should be

chosen. Technical equipment shall be

included in suitable technical

inspections and must fulfill applicable

standards for exhaust noise emissions.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Noise level shall

be measured in

accordance with

Mongolian

Standard MNS

12.1.017 0:

1988/5 х –

“Labor Safety,

Measurement

techniques and

standards of

external and

internal noises at

The workplace for employees shall be

in accordance with the requirements of

protective clothing and accessories

shall ensure full protection. This shall

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 128: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

128

area and heavy

machinery with

possible noise

emissions will be

used.

include providing employees with

hearing protection (headset) where

necessary.

the working

area” (shall not

exceed 60-80

dB).

Infrastructure Increased

amounts of traffic

during

construction can

have an impact on

the existing

infrastructure,

especially the

road network and

local traffic.

Local

community

Manage transportation during the

construction in order to keep the

increase in traffic to a minimum level.

Implement a transport plan that enables

to keep the impact on the existing

infrastructure and the existing traffic

on public roads to a minimum. Try to

avoid accessing residential areas and

main parts of the city with slow

moving heavy transportation vehicles.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable norms

and standards of

Mongolia.

Ensure that all trucks and vehicles

accessing the facility are operated by

licensed operators and all project

vehicles and trucks comply with the

proposed speed limits.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

Occupational

Health and Safety

There could be

additional risks

arising for

workers health

and safety during

construction due

to improper

material,

maintenance of

machines,

training etc.

Employees

and

Workforce on

the site

Develop and implement a Workers

Health and Safety Plan which ensures

the safety of any employee on the

construction site. Such plan should,

among others, include the proper

maintenance of any machines and tools

used, the proper instruction and

training of personnel to use such

machines and the supply of adequate

equipment for the workers.

Mitigation Inspection

and Planning

Continuous EPC

Contractor

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable norms

and standards of

Mongolia.

Implementation of a Camp

Management and Security

Management Plan to ensure the

workers access to safe and healthy

work and living environment.

Mitigation Inspection

and Planning

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Make sure that health screening is

conducted for employees both before

their employment and throughout the

contract period on an irregular basis.

Increase awareness on communicable

disease prevention and collaborate

Mitigation Inspection

and Planning

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 129: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

129

with an on-site medical team.

Socio-economic Positive benefits

of the project may

arise either from

short-term job

opportunities

during

construction or

long-term job

opportunities

during operation.

Local

community

and citizens

of Mongolia.

Construction and operation jobs should

be to the highest extent possible be

assigned to local people within

Sainshand City and other parts of

Mongolia.

Enhancement Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable norms

and standards of

Mongolia. Implement a Corporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) program. Assess

and address the needs of the local

community and work together with

community members during the

construction phase. The Plan should

address the aims and objectives of

community members and shall give

them the opportunity to participate by

expressing their concerns and

limitations.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous EPC

Contractor

ESMP for Operation Phase

Environmental

Attribute

Potential

Impact

Impacted

Objects

Management Action and Compensation

Measures

Type of

Action

Monitoring

Action

Frequency Responsible

Entity

Standard

Permission

Level

Landscape and

Visual

Visual impact

of the

photovoltaic

panels and the

project site

during the day.

All employees

of the facility,

community

members and

visitors.

Incorporate the local community members

and expound the purpose of the project.

The visual impact may be perceived as

positive and future-orientated rather than

negative.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable

norms and

standards of

Mongolia.

Avoid putting colorful graphics and

advertising on the project site.

Mitigation Planning and

Installment

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 130: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

130

Land Use Operational

activities could

impact the

actual land use.

Community

members,

famers and

nomads

Allow community members and others

(including nomadic settlers) to continue

with their activities in the project area as

normal as far as possible.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Allow nomads and community members

to submit complaints if they are

unreasonable withhold from their

previous activities.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Soil Improper

management of

solid waste,

hazardous

waste and other

hazardous

materials.

Livestock,

pastures,

fertile soil,

animals and

plants may be

impacted.

Implement a proper waste management

plan. Make sure that no solid waste is

being dumped on the land and distribute

sufficient numbers of bins and containers

with respective labeling. Ensure that such

containers are emptied or collected by

respective contractors in a timely manner

in order to prevent overflowing. Further,

instruct the local workforce to keep the

produced amount of waste at a minimum

level. Keep track of the produced volume

of waste generated onsite and compare

with the amount collected by the

contractor to prevent illegal dumping.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous Project

Operator

Ministry of

Environment,

the Minister of

Energy, ratified

on May 6, 1989,

22 68 / A / 61,

Annex 5.

MNS

4915:2000,

MNS

4917:2000,

MNS

4919:2000,

MNS

4920:2000,

Resolution no.

64/А/62

Hazardous materials shall be stored in

appropriate areas and it needs to be

ensured that they do not contact land in

case of spillage. (Impermeable surface,

accessible only by authorized personnel,

etc.).

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous Project

Operator

Ensure regular maintenance of all

equipment and machinery used onsite. If

there is a risk of hazardous material

spillage during such maintenance, such

maintenance shall take place on suitable

locations to prevent spilling on the land.

Further, dripping pans shall be installed

on machinery which is likely to leak

hazardous materials such as oil and fuel.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Page 131: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

131

Soil sampling and Environment

monitoring shall be reviewed during the

test program for the period specified (Soil

quality assurance shall be reviewed once a

year. Professional examination of the soil

quality and level of the contamination

shall be performed twice a year).

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Water and Waste

Water Management

Improper

Management of

Water and

Wastewater.

People,

biodiversity

Mechanisms on water conversation and

sustainable use of water in order to

improve the ratio of water resource

management and reduce the water usage.

Workers shall be instructed to prevent the

loss of water.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous Project

Operator

Joint resolution

of State Minister

for Environment

and State

Minister for

Health and

Social Welfare,

Rules and

Procedures for

Protection of

Water Reserves,

No.143/A/352

from 1997 shall

be taken as

guidance and

instruction for

mentioned

activities.

Environmental

certificate of

authorization

procedure are

not currently

available.

Authorized hazardous waste disposal

plant in order to avoid pollution of ground

water. Install fuel and lubricants storage

containers and prevent leakages.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Ensure that waste water containers are

emptied and collected by wastewater

contractor regularly and pay waste water

fee by due date.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Analysis of the use of ground water

supplied from environmental inspection

and testing program in appropriate

periods.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Flora The operation

of the project

could disturb

existing flora in

its natural

habitat.

Implement management measures to

prevent damage to the flora of the site.

This may include establishing a code of

behavior and ensure the awareness of

local workforce and other involved

people.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

Page 132: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

132

Record species of plants, its

categorization, documentation and a long-

term monitoring plan will be coordinated

with the competent authorities.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Ensure that flammable and lubricating

materials are used in a suitable way and

avoid negative impacts on the flora.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Fauna The operation

of the project

could disturb

existing fauna

in its natural

habitat.

Implement management measures to

prevent damage to the fauna of the site.

Establish awareness of the local

workforce concerning the exiting fauna

and avoid hunting.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

Contractor

and Project

Operator

Ensure that flammable and lubricating

materials are used in a suitable way and

avoid negative impacts on the flora.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Noise Noise

generating

activities during

the operation

could have an

impact on the

noise level

around the

project site.

All

employees and

workers on

site.

Noise measurement experts shall inspect

once a year the noise level, including

working conditions and take appropriate

actions if needed.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Noise level

shall be

measured in

accordance with

Mongolian

Standard MNS

12.1.017 0:

1988/5 х –

“Labor Safety,

Measurement

techniques and

standards of

external and

internal noises at

the working

area” (shall not

exceed 60-80

dB).

Page 133: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

133

Occupational

Health and Safety

There could be

risks arising for

workers health

and safety

during

operation and

maintenance

activities due to

improper

material,

maintenance of

machines,

training etc.

Employees

and

Workforce on

the site

Develop and implement a Workers Health

and Safety Plan for the operation phase

which ensures the safety of any employee

on the project site. Such plan should,

among others, include the proper

maintenance of machines and tools used

the proper instruction and training of

personnel to use such machines and the

supply of adequate equipment for the

workers.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable

norms and

standards of

Mongolia.

Implementation of a Camp Management

and Security Management Plan to ensure

the workers access to safe and healthy

work and living environment.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Make sure that health screening is

conducted for employees both before their

employment and throughout the contract

period on an irregular basis.

Mitigation Inspection Continuous Project

Operator

Community Health

and Safety

Public access to

various project

components

(substation,

trenches, and

modules) could

result in public

safety risks.

Local

community

and visitors

The project site must be fenced in order to

avoid unauthorized access. Especially the

substation area must be fenced with

concrete walls and be locked for

unauthorized personnel at all times. An

onsite safety guard should be present at

all times in order to avoid unauthorized

access to the project site. These guards

must be adequately trained. Further, set

up signs in an adequate distance to the

project area warning about the public

safety risk of present components

(substation, modules).

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

contractor

and Project

Operator

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable

norms and

standards of

Mongolia.

Make sure that the project security is

aware of the projects goals to establish

good relationships with the stakeholders.

Develop a conduct for security personnel

and introduce the head of the security

personnel to neighboring communities

and outline the necessary safety

precautions.

Mitigation Inspection

and briefing

of local

workforce

Continuous EPC

contractor

and Project

Operator

Page 134: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

134

Socio-economic Positive

benefits of the

project may

arise from the

long-term

operation of the

plant.

Local

community

and citizens of

Mongolia.

Job vacancies for the operation of the

plant should be to the highest extent

possible be assigned to local people

within Sainshand City and other parts of

Mongolia.

Enhancement Reporting on

the outcomes

Continuous Project

Operator

All permissible

levels shall be

strictly

maintained in

accordance with

applicable

norms and

standards of

Mongolia.

Implement a Corporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) program. Assess

and address the needs of the local

community and work together with

community members during the operation

phase. The Plan should address the aims

and objectives of community members

and shall give them the opportunity to

participate by expressing their concerns

and limitations. It is important to build up

a strong socio-economic relationship with

the local community before and during

the start of construction as well as during

the operation of the plant.

Mitigation Reporting on

the outcomes

Continuous Project

Operator

The

implementation

of the project

could increase

the awareness

of alternative

electricity

generation and

increase its

market share.

Implement cooperation with local

universities. Mongolian universities and

their students can gain hands on

experience in energy production from the

large scale PV Power Plant. Thereby, the

project can play a significant role in the

training and employment process in

Mongolia.

Enhancement Reporting on

the outcomes

Continuous Project

Operator

Page 135: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

135

ESMP for Decommissioning Phase

Environmental Attribute Potential Impact Management Action and Compensation Measures

Landscape and Visual The decommissioning activities are likely to create a

visual intrusion and a disruption to aesthetics including

materials lay down, excavation, backfilling and spoil.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Soil Soil erosion and pollution may be caused due to human

activity within the framework of decommissioning works

of the Solar PV power plant and utilization of heavy

machinery and other technical equipment.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Water and Waste Water

Management

Improper Management of Water and Wastewater. Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Flora Decommissioning activities could disturb and harm

existing flora.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Fauna Decommissioning activities could disturb and harm

existing fauna.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Air Quality Decommissioning works may affect the amount of dust in

the air and pollute the environment.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Noise Several noise generating activities during the

decommissioning such as earthworks, haulage activities,

excavation and installation of PV panels will have an

impact on the noise level around the project area and

heavy machinery with possible noise emissions will be

used.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Infrastructure Increased amounts of traffic during decommissioning can

have an impact on the existing infrastructure, especially

the road network and local traffic.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Occupational Health and

Safety

There could be additional risks arising for workers health

and safety during decommissioning due to improper

material, maintenance of machines, training and so on.

Refer to the respective mitigation and monitoring measures listed in

"ESMP for Construction Phase".

Page 136: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

136

7.4 Environmental Monitoring Program /2014-2018

The exploration sites are located in Dornogovi province of Mongolia. For every

exploration license, an environmental monitoring program is put in place to keep track

of the impacts on the environment in the area where exploration is being carried out.

Each program is reviewed and approved by the Mongolian Government and so far

exploration activities have had no impact requiring corrective action, such as:

7.4.1 Air environment pollution - code-J0

7.4.1.1 Monitoring performance

In the atmosphere of CO2, CH4, SO2, O2, NO2, H2S, unsaturated hydrocarbon,

pollution

7.4.1.2 Monitoring analysis type

Air sampling and analysis

7.4.1.3 Places

Wind domination in the direction from the lower area

7.4.1.4 Monitoring period, chart

2 times per year, 3rd and 4th quarter

7.4.1.5 Methodology:

UST17.2.3.16-80 "Urban air quality control procedures UST3384-82" and "General

Requirements for atmospheric sampling"

7.4.1.6 Equipment

Central Environment Research Laboratory in Ulaanbaatar

7.4.1.7 Performance records and reports:

Monitoring and registration forms prepared by the competent authorities, the permissible

size comparison

7.4.1.8 Data collection and reporting process:

Annual II in the 15th inspection agencies and local administrative bodies in the

environmental see work report delivered by.

Page 137: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

137

7.4.2 Soil pollution code-S0

7.4.2.1 Monitoring performance:

Soil chemical properties

7.4.2.2 Monitoring type

Soil sampling and analysis

7.4.2.3 Location:

From outside the fence in the direction of the prevailing wind

7.4.2.4 The period for analysis

Monitoring time of 2 times a year by agreement between the competent authorities,

3rd and 4th quarter

7.4.2.5 Methodology

Determination of sanitary evaluation of soil pollution in urban areas, instructions

7.4.2.6 Equipment and machinery

Central Environment Research Laboratory in Ulaanbaatar and other authorized soil

analysis laboratories

7.4.2.7 Performance records and reports

Test results issued by the competent authorities submit the form, the permissible size

comparison

7.4.2.8 Data collection and reporting process:

Annual II in the 15th inspection agencies and local administrative bodies in the

environmental see work report delivered by.

7.4.3 Groundwater pollution-code-J1 analyzes

7.4.3.1 Monitoring Rating:

Drinking water standards

7.4.3.2 The types of monitoring:

Chemical analysis of deep water

7.4.3.3 Location:

Page 138: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

138

Water from groundwater wells

7.4.3.4 Monitoring period

2 times per year, 3rd and 4th quarter

7.4.3.5 Methodology

"UST3534-83" Water sampling methods, conforming to the standards and methods of

chemical analysis

7.4.3.6 Equipment

Authorized chemical analysis laboratories

7.4.3.7 Performance records and reports

Test results issued by the competent authorities submit the form,with permissible size

comparison

7.4.4 Environmental Monitoring Annual Plan

The amount of the annual plans of monitoring of environmental protection and related

annual cost of environmental protection plans to work with the monitoring of staff

costs, travel expenses and their respective object to the cost of the travel and necessary

costs of sampling and sample delivery cost, the cost of the laboratory analysis consists

thereof.

Environmental monitoring work is accomplished in the table below which reflects the

yearly plan.

No.

Name and type of works

Measuring

unit

Work

load/vol

ume

Cost per

unit, in

thousand

MNT

Total cost, in

thousand

MNT

1 Cost for experts

and advisers

Person/day

1/2

3 times

15.0

30х 3 = 90.0

2 Per diem cost Person/day 1/2 10.0 20.0

3

Transportation costs

- vehicle

2

3 times

15.0

30.0 х 3 = 90.0

4

Measuring and

sampling costs

Amount

1

1

1

- water 3.0

- soil 5.0

- air 10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

Page 139: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

139

5

Cost for laboratory

analysis

Amount

1

1

1

- water 20.0

- soil 15.0

- air 35.0

20.0

15.0

35.0

Total sum 288.0

Table7-8 Environmental Monitoring Yearly Plan

Page 140: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

140

References

1. Feasibility Study of the Solar PC Power Plant, projected to be constructed in

Sainshand city of Dornogovi Province. Ulaanbaatar, 2013.

2. “Instruction manual for Enviromental Impact Assessment experts”. World Bank,

Ministry of Environment, 2006.

3. Methodical instructions for Environmental Impact Assessment. Ministry of

Environment and others. Ulaanbaatar. 2010.

4. Law of Mongolia on Environmental Protection. Ulaanbaatar, 1995.

5. Soil Map of the People‟s Republic of Mongolia, M1: 1.000.000, Ulaanbaatar, 1980.

6. National Atlas of the People‟s Republic of Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar-Moscow, 1990.

7. D. Dorjgotov, D. Batbayar, Classification of the soil of the People‟s Republic of

Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar. 1986.

8. D. Dorjgotov Soil Map of Mongolia. 1989.

9. Melnikov. N. V., “Theory and practice of open pit mining activities”. Moscow, 1973.

10. G. Namkhaijantsan, “Construction norms and rules. Atmosphere and geophysical

indicators used in construction". SNIP2.01.01-93. Press of Ministry of Environment.

Ulaanbaatar.1994. page 146.

11. Sh. Tsegmid, Physical geography of Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar.1969.

12. Research Reports of the Joint Mongolia-Soviet Biological Expedition

13. G. Erdenejav, Biological cultivation of perennial for age grassroots. Ulaanbaatar.

1981.

14. Ананьева Н.Б. Мөнхбаяр Х., Орлов Н.Л., Орлова В.Ф., Сесенов Д.В.,

Тэрбиш Х. 1997. Земноводные и пресмыкающиеся Монголии.

Пресмыкающиеся. Москва.

15. Банников А.Г. 1954. Млекопитающие Монгольской Народной

Республики. Москва.

16. Болд А. 1990. Эколого-географические основы охраны и рационального

использования орнитофауны МНР. Москва. Докторская диссертация.

17. Кузмин С.Л, Боркин Л.Я, Мөнхбаяр Х. 1988. Земноводные и

пресмыкающиеся МНР. Земноводные. Москва.

18. Соколов В.Е., Орлов В.Н. 1980. Определитель млекопитающих

Монгольской Народной Республики. Москва.

19. Юнатов А.А., Дашням. 1979. БНМАУ-ын ургамалжилтын зураг. Москва.

Page 141: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

141

Appendix 1 Conceptual Area Layout

Page 142: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

142

Appendix 2 Time Schedule

Page 143: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

143

Appendix 3 Typical Monitoring System Block Diagram

Page 144: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) · 2020-07-02 · Table 5-2: Evaluation Symbols for Levels of Environmental and Social Impact Table 5-3: Comparison of overall environmental

144

Appendix 4 Overview Single Line Diagram