environmental debates

25
Environmental Debates Dominant paradigm values wealth creation and the domination of nature. Alternative environmental paradigm gives non- material values prominence and takes the view that humans should live in harmony with the environment. Gaia Hypothesis: earth as a living organism The environment as a global issue Global environmental and climatic change

Upload: mostyn

Post on 12-Jan-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Environmental Debates. Dominant paradigm values wealth creation and the domination of nature. Alternative environmental paradigm gives non-material values prominence and takes the view that humans should live in harmony with the environment. Gaia Hypothesis: earth as a living organism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Environmental Debates

Environmental Debates

Dominant paradigm values wealth creation and the domination of nature.

Alternative environmental paradigm gives non-material values prominence and takes the view that humans should live in harmony with the environment.

• Gaia Hypothesis: earth as a living organism• The environment as a global issue • Global environmental and climatic change

Page 2: Environmental Debates

Impact of Globalization and Development

• Industrialization• Urbanization• Resource Extraction• World Bank Infrastructure Projects and Impacts • Removal of Trade Barriers and Open Markets• Structural Adjustment Programs and Debt

Page 3: Environmental Debates

Impact of Globalization and Development

• Result = • More environmental destruction than at any

previous moment in history• Crisis of biodiversity• Scale and Intensity of destruction of natural

ecosystems• Global warming• Toxic wastes and toxic chemicals in the food

chain

Page 4: Environmental Debates

Regional Deforestation Rates

Region Forest Area Annual % Change (hectares 1995) (1991-1995)

Tropical RegionsAfrica 504.90 -3.69Asia/Oceania 321.67 -3.21Latin America/Caribbean 907.39 -5.69

Nontropical RegionsAfrica 15.34 -0.05Asia/Oceania 243.20 -0.21Latin America/Caribbean 42.65 -0.12Europe 145.99 +0.39Former Soviet Union 816.17 +0.56North America 457.09 +0.76• Source: UN Food and Agriculture Organization, State of the World's Forests 1997

(Rome: UN, 1997).

Page 5: Environmental Debates

Status of Coral Reefs by Region(mid-1990s)

Region Total Reef Area % of Total at High (sq. kilometers) or Medium Risk

Middle east 20,000 61Caribbean 20,000 61Atlantic 3,100 87Indian Ocean 36,100 54Southeast Asia 68,100 82Pacific 108,000 41Global Total 255,300 58• Source: World Resources institute, et al., Reefs at

Risk: A Map-Based Indicator of Threats to the World's Coral Reefs (Washington, DC: 1998).

Page 6: Environmental Debates

Annual Mean Global Surface Air Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations, 1866-1998

13

13.5

14

14.5

15

1866 1916 1966 1998

Mean Temperature, C

382

352

322

292

262

232

202

CO2, parts per million

x

x

x

xx

x

xCarbon dioxide concentration

Surface air temperature

Temperature trend, 1966-98: +1.69 C./century

Page 7: Environmental Debates

Materials* Consumption, 1970-1995

(metric tons per capita)

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

U.S. 10.38 9.26 9.55 9.26 10.22 10.84World** 1.53 1.49 1.56 1.49 1.61 1.66

*Materials include: minerals, wood products, metals, and synthetics.

**The world dataset does not include all commodities and varies greatly in how data is reported.

Page 8: Environmental Debates

U.S. Consumption of Global Resources

• Resource U.S. as a % of World • Energy Consumption (1995) 24.8% • Forestry Product Consumption (1996) 18.5% • Materials Consumption (1995) 28.7% • Water Consumption (1990) 13.7% • Population (1999) 4.6%

Page 9: Environmental Debates

Novel Conceptual Issues • 1. The creation of “technonatures”

• Human have always intervened in nature – Rainforests and their inhabitants co-produce one

another; – Farms and plantations as designed ecosystems– Molecular technologies—genetics and

biotechnologies: new reproductive technologies; nanotechnologies

• Biology under control is no longer “nature”• Capacity to “design” evolution?

Page 10: Environmental Debates

Novel Conceptual Issues

• 2. New ideas about the relations of nature + culture • Development: both nature and culture irrelevant

in “modern” societies. – False: cultural differences increasingly important +

development and economic activities of industrialized nations led to current crisis

Page 11: Environmental Debates

Novel Conceptual Issues

– --Cultural Ecology Paradigm (Anthropology, 1950s-1960s): humans “adapt” to the environment while changing it to meet their own needs

– --Problem: larger forces (e.g., capitalism) affect local human/environment relations

– --Political Ecology: human/nature relations in the context of local cultures, global forces; includes issues of ethnicity, gender etc.

Page 12: Environmental Debates

Towards Solutions: International Institutions (UN Conferences)

• 1.Stockholm (1972), Declaration on the Environment– http://www.tufts.edu/departments/fletcher

/multi/texts/STOCKHOLM-DECL.txt

--North/South Conflicts:

• --Development/Economic Welfare vs. the Environment?

• --Protect rainforest vs. transform production/consumption?

Page 13: Environmental Debates

Towards Solutions: International Institutions (UN Conferences)

• 2. Earth Summit, Rio de Janeiro (1992), Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development

• http://www.nssd.net/index.html-- Nation-States as Obstacles?-- Problems are global/international-- Principle of Sovereignty over a given territory breaks human unity + interrelation between territories (global ecosystem)-- Resource extraction important to states; each acts on behalf of interests

Page 14: Environmental Debates

Towards Solutions: International Institutions (UN Conferences)

• Growing awareness: interdependent/global character of the problem

• International Institutions more rhetoric than action; no power to implement

• Everyone’s an environmentalist yet nothing changes?

Page 15: Environmental Debates

Alternative Institutions and Social Movements: bypassing nation- states?

Growth of Humanitarian NGOs in 1990s (undermine rationale for Nation-State?)

Critique of debt burdens“Debt-for-Nature” plans

http://www.conservation.org/web/ABOUTCI/STRATEGY/Dfnswap.htm

Page 16: Environmental Debates

Alternative Institutions and Social Movements: bypassing nation-states?

New Social Movements Privileged spaces, sources of inspiration to think

differently about the environment Environmental Justice Movement = poor/minorities +

“environmental discrimination” Rainforest Movement Indigenous People’s Movements Oppose lack of transparency/participation in making

decisions about uses of space Seek voice = local democracy or autonomy

Page 17: Environmental Debates

Key Features of Transnational Activist Networks

1. Simultaneously Local and Global • Global:

– --“Glacial time” frame; evolutionary thinking = global perspective

– --Use of new technologies (internet/web to coordinate actions, share information; media events, video)

Local:--Defense of places; harmony with environment starts

locally--Participation and Grassroots organizations

Page 18: Environmental Debates

Key Features of Transnational Activist Networks

2. Source of a new global biological identity capable of weaving in singular cultures and diversity?

• Include local communities with different ways of thinking about/using environment

• rights to territorial autonomy + cultural identity

• preservation of local practices and knowledges (different ideas about use of territory)

Page 19: Environmental Debates

Key Features of Transnational Activist Networks

3. Formation of a new culture (new ways of thinking about relations among economy, society, nature)?

• Nature in the “modern” model: --radical separation human and nature--Nature to be conquered through science/technology

• Other models: continuity human/natural/spiritual = different treatment of natural world

Page 20: Environmental Debates

Key Features of Transnational Activist Networks

4. Growing links environmental movements + other social struggles (human rights, women’s groups, indigenous peoples)

Page 21: Environmental Debates

Ethnic minorities and indigenous rights movements

• http://www.china.org.cn/e-groups/shaoshu/

Honor Our Neighbors Origins and Rights

http://www.nativeweb.org/resources/human_rights_organizations/

Page 22: Environmental Debates

UNPO -- Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation

“UNPO is an international organisation created by nations and peoples around the world, who are not represented as such in the world´s principal international organisations, such as the United Nations.”

• “Founded in 1991, UNPO today consists of over 50 members who represent over 100 million persons.”

• “UNPO offers an international forum for occupied nations, indigenous peoples, minorities, and even oppressed majorities who currently struggle to regain their lost countries, preserve their cultural identities, protect their basic human and economic rights and safeguard the natural environment.”

• http://www.unpo.org/

Page 23: Environmental Debates

Launch BroadcastJuly 28, 1999

Evolving Ontology

Page 24: Environmental Debates
Page 25: Environmental Debates

Launch BroadcastJuly 28, 1999

Evolving OntologyJoseph Firmage

February 8, 2000