environmental policies and law 2020-21 2s evolution of ......seveso disaster, italy the impact •...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 1
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
ENVIRONMENT POLICIES EVOLUTION
Part 2
António Gonçalves Henriques
1973
Oil Crisis - OPEC• The 1973 oil crisis began in October 1973 when the members of
the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC,
consisting of the Arab members of the OPEC plus Egypt and
Syria) proclaimed an oil embargo. The embargo was targeted at
nations perceived as supporting Israel during the Yom Kippur
War.
• By the end of the embargo in March 1974, the price of oil had
risen from $3 per barrel to nearly $12 (current prices). The oil
crisis had many short-term and long-term effects on global
politics and the global economy.
Members of OPEC
Saudi Arabia (1960)
Iran (1960)
Iraq (1960)
Kuwait (1960)
Venezuela (1960)
Qatar (1961)
Libya (1962)
Indonesia (1962-2009)
United Arab Emirates (1967)
Algeria (1969)
Nigeria (1971)
Ecuador (1973 to 1992 and from 2007)
Gabon (1975 to 1994)
Angola (2007)
1
2
![Page 2: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 2
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1973
The Yom Kippur War• Yom Kippur, also known as the Day of Atonement (reparation or expiation for sin),
is the holiest day of the year in Judaism. Its central themes are atonement and
repentance. Jews traditionally observe this holy day with a day-long fast and
intensive prayer, often spending most of the day in synagogue services.
• The Yom Kippur War, also known as the 1973 Arab–Israeli War, was fought from 6
to 25 October 1973, by a coalition of Arab states led by Egypt and Syria against
Israel. The war took place mostly in Sinai and the Golan Heights — occupied by
Israel during the 1967 Six-Day War. Egypt's initial war objective was to use its
military to seize a foothold on the east bank of the Suez Canal and use this to
negotiate the return of the rest of Sinai.
1973
The Yom Kippur War• The war began when the Arab coalition launched a joint surprise attack on Israeli
positions. Egyptian and Syrian forces crossed ceasefire lines to enter the Sinai
Peninsula and the Golan Heights, respectively. Both the United States and the
Soviet Union initiated massive resupply efforts to their respective allies during the
war, and these efforts led to a near-confrontation between the two nuclear
superpowers.
• By 24 October, the Israelis had improved their positions considerably. This
development led to tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, and
a second ceasefire was imposed cooperatively on 25 October to end the war.
3
4
![Page 3: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 3
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
5
6
![Page 4: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 4
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
Crude Oil Prices – Inflation adjusted
Ara
boil
em
barg
o
Irania
nre
volu
tion
Iran-I
raq
war
SaudiA
rabia
abandons
sw
ing p
roducer
role
Iraq
invades
Kuw
ait
Gulf
war
Asia
neconom
iccrisis
9/1
1 a
ttacks
PD
VS
A s
trik
e
OP
EC
cutb
acks
Glo
bal finance
crisis
OP
EC
cutb
acks
Uprisin
gs
in
Egyp
t&
Lib
yaS
yria
nconflic
t
Excess
supply
1973
CITES CONVENTION
Washington, DC
CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international agreement between
governments. Its aim is to ensure that international trade in
specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their
survival.
7
8
![Page 5: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 5
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1973
CITES CONVENTION• International wildlife trade is estimated to be worth billions of dollars and to
include hundreds of millions of plant and animal specimens.
• The trade is diverse, ranging from live animals and plants to a vast array of
wildlife products derived from them, including food products, exotic leather
goods, wooden musical instruments, timber, tourist curios and medicines.
• Levels of exploitation of some animal and plant species are high and the trade
in them, together with other factors, such as habitat loss, is capable of heavily
depleting their populations and even bringing some species close to extinction.
• Many wildlife species in trade are not endangered, but the existence of an
agreement to ensure the sustainability of the trade is important in order to
safeguard these resources for the future.
1973
CITES CONVENTION• Because the trade in wild animals and plants crosses borders between
countries, the effort to regulate it requires international cooperation to
safeguard certain species from over-exploitation. CITES was conceived in the
spirit of such cooperation. Today, it accords varying degrees of protection to
more than 35,000 species of animals and plants, whether they are traded as
live specimens, fur coats or dried herbs.
• The text of the Convention was agreed at a meeting of representatives of 80
countries in Washington, D.C., the United States of America, on 3 March 1973,
and CITES entered in force on 1 July 1975.
9
10
![Page 6: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 6
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1973
CITES CONVENTION• CITES is an international agreement to which States (countries) adhere voluntarily.
States that have agreed to be bound by the Convention ('joined' CITES) are known
as Parties. Although CITES is legally binding on the Parties – in other words they
have to implement the Convention – it does not take the place of national laws.
Rather it provides a framework to be respected by each Party, which has to adopt
its own domestic legislation to ensure that CITES is implemented at the national
level.
• CITES has now 183 Parties.
1973
CITES CONVENTION
Parties to the CITES Convention
11
12
![Page 7: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 7
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1973
CITES CONVENTION• Roughly 5,600 species of animals and 30,000 species of plants are protected by
CITES against over-exploitation through international trade. They are listed in the
three CITES Appendices.
• CITES works by subjecting international trade in specimens of selected species to
certain controls. All import, export, re-export and introduction from the sea of
species covered by the Convention must be authorized through a licensing system.
1973
CITES CONVENTION• Appendix I lists species that are the most endangered. They are threatened with
extinction and CITES prohibits international trade in specimens of these species
except when the purpose of the import is not commercial, for instance for
scientific research.
• Appendix II lists species that are not necessarily now threatened with extinction
but that may become so unless trade is closely controlled. International trade in
specimens of Appendix-II species may be authorized by the granting of an export
permit or re-export certificate. Permits or certificates should only be granted if
certain conditions are met, above all that trade will not be detrimental to the
survival of the species in the wild.
• Appendix III is a list of species included at the request of a Party that already
regulates trade in the species and that needs the cooperation of other countries to
prevent unsustainable or illegal exploitation.
13
14
![Page 8: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 8
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1973
CITES CONVENTION
Common name: Giant PandaScientific name:Ailuropoda melanoleucaDistribution: ChinaCITES listing: Appendix I
Common name: Asian ElephantScientific name:Elephas maximusDistribution:South and Southeast Asia, ChinaCITES listing: Appendix I
Common name: Wolf, Grey Wolf, Timber WolfScientific name: Canis lupusDistribution: Asia, Europe,North AmericaCITES listing: Appendix II
1974
Warning that CFCs could cause serious harm
to Earth's protective ozone layer
“Nature” Journal• Sherry Rowland and Mario Molina, chemists at the University of California, Irvine,
published the first scientific paper warning that human-generated
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) could cause serious harm to Earth's protective ozone
layer. They calculated that if CFC production continued to increase at the going
rate of 10%/year until 1990, then remain steady, CFCs would cause a global 5-7%
ozone loss by 1995 and 30-50% loss by 2050.
• They warned that the loss of ozone would significantly increase the amount of
skin-damaging ultraviolet UV-B light reaching the surface, greatly increasing skin
cancer and cataracts. The loss of stratospheric ozone could also significantly cool
the stratosphere, potentially causing destructive climate change. Although no
stratospheric ozone loss had been observed yet, in 1974, CFCs should be banned,
they said.
15
16
![Page 9: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 9
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1974
Warning that CFCs could cause serious
harm to Earth's protective ozone layer
1974
Warning that CFCs could cause serious harm
to Earth's protective ozone layer• At the time, the CFC industry was worth about 8 thousand million USD in
the U.S., employed over 600,000 people directly, and 1.4 million people
indirectly .
• Critics and skeptics – primarily industry spokespeople and scientists from
conservative think tanks – immediately attacked the theory.
• Despite the fact that Molina and Rowland's theory had wide support in
the scientific community, a handful of skeptics, their voices greatly
amplified by the public relations machines of powerful corporations and
politicians sympathetic to them, succeeded in delaying imposition of
controls on CFCs for many years.
17
18
![Page 10: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 10
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1974
Warning that CFCs could cause serious harm
to Earth's protective ozone layer
1976
Catastrophe or New Society? A Latin
American World Model.
Fundacion Bariloche
– Response of the 3rd World to "Limits to Growth“
claims growth and equity for the 3rd World.
19
20
![Page 11: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 11
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Seveso Disaster, Italy• The Seveso disaster took place on the premises of ICMESA (Società Industrie
Chimiche Azionaria Meda), a chemical plant owned by Roche.
• An uncontrollable surge in temperature and pressure caused the rupture of a safety valve, resulting in release into the air of a mixture of chemicals.
• This toxic cloud containing TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin), then widely believed to be one of the most toxic man-made chemicals, contaminated a densely populated area about six kilometres long and one kilometre wide, lying downwind from the site.
1976
Seveso Disaster, Italy
21
22
![Page 12: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 12
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Impact
• This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of a neighboring municipality that was most severely affected. The product spread over large area on the Lombard plain, between Milan and Lake Como. More than 700 people were evacuated, 2,000 treated for dioxin poisoning, and restrictions were applied to another 30,000. More than 25 km2 of land and vegetation were contaminated.
• Seveso, with 17,000 inhabitants, located 21 km north of Milan was the most severely affected.
• Due to contamination, 3300 animals were found dead (especially poultry and rabbits), and more than 80 000 had to be slaughtered to prevent the entry of dioxin into the food chain.
• Although no immediate fatalities were reported, the full horror of the incident slowly emerged over the following days, months and years. More than 200 people have been treated for dioxin poisoning.
1976
Seveso Disaster, Italy• A monitoring program was initiated for environmental systems and media to determine
the level of exposure, the extent of contamination, and the behavior and fate of TCDD released into the environment. Information about exposures was also obtained from signs/symptoms. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for TCDD and blood chemistry. The early screening of thousands of children revealed chloracne as the main health effect.
• The studies on long-term effects of mortality and cancer incidence revealed an increased occurrence of cardiovascular diseases that might have been related to stressors caused by the disaster. Results from the cancer incidence study showed an increased risk of hepatobiliary cancer particularly in those residing for more than five years. Some men had an increased risk of leukemia, and women exhibited an increase in multiple myeloma and myeloid leukemia.
23
24
![Page 13: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 13
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Lessons Learnt from the Disaster
• At the time of the Seveso disaster, the complexity of communication problems under conditions of severe uncertainty was recognized.
• Before the gas release, no one outside the plant, neither residents nor political or health authorities , had any idea that a hazard of such magnitude could be possible. The explosion and release were greeted by incredulity, followed by alarm and dismay.
• The firm's initial behavior led to subsequent suspicion about their motives; various instructions for precautionary measures were issued almost immediately, but the firm denied knowledge of the toxic substances involved. Ten days passed before the firm confirmed that dioxin had been released. Only then did the governmental authorities and the public learn that there was a grave risk.
• Even so, it was impossible to assess the danger with any precision. There was an onset of genuine dread, about illness in general and about malformed babies in particular. The widespread illness and deaths of animals of many species was a threatening sign.
1976
Seveso Disaster, Italy• The authorities had their own severe problems of decision-making under uncertainty,
including the definition of different polluted zones, programmes of evacuation of endangered residents, and disposal of contaminated material.
• From the very beginning of the disaster, situational uncertainty was salient; decisions had to be taken, sometimes under conditions of great urgency' in the nearly complete absence of information that might guide actions. Scientific uncertainty was crucial to the local magistrate’s decision to close the site eight days after the accident.
• Societal uncertainty was severe because there had been no previous institutional preparation or consultation for the accident. Legal/moral uncertainty was also severe.
25
26
![Page 14: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 14
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Seveso Directive
• Nations downstream from other nations will always be threatened by environmental spills and accidents caused by upstream nations.
• For this reason, international treaties and laws governing transboundary pollution are crucial for preventing disasters. They are needed to resolve issues related to liability and compensation. They are also needed to protect countries from domestic disasters caused by the carelessness or exploitative activities of foreign companies.
• Legislation aimed at the prevention and control of accidents involving dangerous substances in the EU was significantly prompted by this particular disaster, among others.
• As a result, in 1982, the Seveso Directive (Council Directive 82/501/EEC) on the major accident hazards of certain industrial activities was adopted, later amended in light of two other major accidents.
• In 1996, the Seveso Directive II (Council Directive 96/82/EC) replaced its predecessor, and in 2012 the new Directive 2012/18/EU (Seveso-III) was adopted, and Seveso Directive II was repealed.
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Seveso III Directive
The principles
• The Seveso Directive aims at the prevention of major accidents involving dangerous substances. However, as accidents may nevertheless occur, it also aims at limiting the consequences of such accidents not only for human health but also for the environment.
• The Directive covers establishments where dangerous substances may be present (e.g.during processing or storage) in quantities above a certain threshold. Excluded from the Directive are certain industrial activities which are subject to other legislation providing a similar level of protection (e.g. nuclear establishments or the transport of dangerous substances).
• Depending on the amount of dangerous substances present, establishments are categorised in lower and upper tier establishments, the latter are subject to more stringent requirements.
27
28
![Page 15: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 15
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Seveso III Directive
Main obligations for operators
• Operators are obliged to take all necessary measures to prevent major accidents and to limit their consequences for human health and the environment. The requirements include:
• Notification of all concerned establishments;
• Deploying a major accident prevention policy;
• Producing a safety report for upper-tier establishments;
• Producing internal emergency plans for upper tier establishments;
• Providing information in case of accidents.
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Seveso III Directive
Main obligations for Member State authorities
• Member States need to ensure that a number of requirements are fulfilled, those include:
• Producing external emergency plans for upper tier establishments ;
• Deploying land-use planning for the siting of establishments ;
• Making relevant information publically available ;
• Ensuring that any necessary action is taken after an accident including emergency measures, actions to ensure that the operator takes any necessary remedial measures and informing the persons likely to be affected;
• Reporting accidents to the Commission;
• Prohibiting the unlawful use or operation of establishments;
• Conducting inspections.
• Member States may maintain or adopt stricter measures than those contained in the Seveso Directive.
29
30
![Page 16: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 16
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Seveso Disaster, ItalyThe Seveso III Directive
Citizens' rights
• The public concerned has to be consulted and involved in the decision making for specific individual projects;
• Subject to the conditions outlined, Member State authorities need to make available any information held pursuant to the Seveso Directive;
• Access to justice needs to be granted in some specified cases.
1976
Habitat
Vancouver, Canada• Habitat I refers to the first United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, in Vancouver,
Canada, 1976, convened by the United Nations as governments began to recognize the
magnitude and consequences of rapid urbanization.
• Following the Conference, the General Assembly adopted the Vancouver Declaration on
Human Settlements, which carried an action plan with 64 recommendations for National
Action.
• A further outcome of the conference, was the establishment of the United Nations Centre
for Human Settlements - UNCHS (Habitat) with headquarters at Nairobi, Kenya.
• It is mandated to promote socially and environmentally sustainable towns and cities with the goal of providing adequate shelter for all.
31
32
![Page 17: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 17
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1976
Habitat
Vancouver, Canada• Cities are facing unprecedented demographic, environmental, economic, social and
spatial challenges.
• There has been an exceptional shift towards urbanization, with 6 out of every 10 people
in the world expected to reside in urban areas by 2030. Over 90 per cent of this growth
will take place in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean.
• In the absence of effective urban planning, the consequences of this rapid urbanization
will be dramatic. In many places around the world, the effects can already be felt: lack of
proper housing and growth of slums, inadequate and out-dated infrastructure – be it
roads, public transport, water, sanitation, or electricity – escalating poverty and
unemployment, safety and crime problems, pollution and health issues, as well as poorly
managed natural or man-made disasters and other catastrophes due to the effects of
climate change.
1976
Habitat
Vancouver, Canada• Policies, and approaches towards urbanization need to change in order for the growth of
cities and urban areas to be turned into opportunities that will leave nobody behind.
• UN-Habitat envisions well-planned, well-governed, and efficient cities and other human
settlements, with adequate housing, infrastructure, and universal access to employment
and basic services such as water, energy, and sanitation.
33
34
![Page 18: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 18
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1977
United Nations Conference on
Desertification• “Desertification” is land degradation in arid, semi-arid, and dry sub-humid areas resulting
from various factors, including climatic variations and human activities.
• It remains potentially the most threatening ecosystem change impacting the socio-economic
conditions of millions of people living in the drylands, which account for a significant
proportion of the Earth’s land.
• It is caused by complex interactions of a number of physical, biological, political, social,
cultural, and economic factors. Generally, it is a detrimental process that brings about a
gradual and an unnoticed reduction in the productive capacity of land over a period of
years.
• Although desertification occurs in all regions, it has high concentrations in developing
countries, especially in Africa. For example, developing countries in Asia, Africa, and South
America have larger populations living in drylands. An estimated 40% of people in Africa and
Asia live in areas constantly threatened by desertification .
USDA US Department of Agriculture 'Global Desertification Vulnerability Map‘http://soils.usda.gov/use/worldsoils/mapindex/desert.html
35
36
![Page 19: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 19
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1977
United Nations Conference on
Desertification• Achieving the core objectives of sustainable development will remain an impossible
mission for nearly two thousand million people living in the world’s drylands, whose
biological productivity is under serious threat from the intensifying trend of desertification.
• The global annual loss to desertification is in the order of 60,000 km2.
• Due to desertification, the annual loss of income is estimated at USD 65 thousand million,
and this does not include the costs incurred in social and environmental aspects.
• The costs of desertification are most often measured in terms of lost productivity, which
includes the reduced crop yields, grazing intensities, etc. Secondary costs are the loss of
ecosystem services and ecological functions that affect the very sustainability of the planet.
1977
United Nations Conference on
Desertification• The international community has long recognized that land degradation/desertification is a
major economic, social and environmental problem of concern to many countries in all
regions of the world. In 1977, the United Nations Conference on Desertification (UNCOD), in
Nairobi, Kenya, adopted a Plan of Action to Combat Desertification (PACD).
• The Conference was the first occasion on which the nations of the world turned their
concerted attention to the need for a comprehensive plan to halt and reverse
desertification.
• The Conference concluded that both the causes of desertification and the technical
solutions to combating it are known. The key to combative measures is to be found in
proper land-use. If desertification is to be brought to a halt considerable financial resources
will, however, be necessary.
37
38
![Page 20: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 20
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1978
“Amoco Cadiz” accident
Coast of Brittany, France• Amoco Cadiz was a very large crude carrier (VLCC) under the Liberian flag of convenience
owned by Amoco.
• On 16 March 1978, she ran aground on Portsall Rocks, 5 km from the coast of Brittany,
France due to severe weather conditions and to the failure of the hydraulic steering
mechanism.
• Ultimately the crude carrier split in three and sank, releasing 1,604,500 barrels (219,797
tons) of light crude oil and 4,000 tons of fuel oil resulting in the largest oil spill of its kind in
history to that date.
Portsall Rocks
1978
“Amoco Cadiz” accident
Coast of Brittany, France• A slick 18 miles wide and 80 miles long polluted approximately 350 km of Brittany
coastline.
• Severe weather resulted in the complete break up of the ship before any oil could be
pumped out of the wreck.
• Beaches of 76 different Breton communities were oiled. The isolated location of the
grounding and rough seas restricted cleanup efforts for the two weeks following the
incident.
39
40
![Page 21: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 21
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1978
“Amoco Cadiz” accident
Coast of Brittany, France• At the time, the Amoco Cadiz incident resulted in the largest loss of marine life
ever recorded after an oil spill.
• Mortalities of most animals occurred over the two-month period following the
spill.
• Two weeks after the accident, millions of dead molluscs, sea urchins, and other
benthic species washed ashore. Although small crustacean populations almost
completely disappeared from some areas, populations of many species had
recovered within a year.
• Diving birds constituted the majority of the nearly 20,000 dead birds that were
recovered.
1978
“Amoco Cadiz” accident
Coast of Brittany, France• Oyster cultivation in the estuaries was seriously affected and an estimated
9,000 tonnes were destroyed because of contamination and to safeguard
market confidence.
• Other shell and fin fisheries (including seaweed gathering) were seriously
affected in the short-term, as was tourism.
• Failure to remove oil from temporary oil collection pits on some soft sediment
shorelines before inundation by the incoming tide also resulted in longer-term
contamination.
41
42
![Page 22: Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s Evolution of ......Seveso Disaster, Italy The Impact • This event became internationally known as the Seveso disaster, after the name of](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062510/61452f7c34130627ed50d2d3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
António Gonçalves Henriques
2021-03-10 22
Environmental Policies and Law 2020-21 2s
Evolution of Environmental Policies – Part 2
1978
“Amoco Cadiz” accident
Coast of Brittany, France• In 1978, it was estimated to have caused 250 million USD in damage to fisheries and
tourist amenities. The French government presented claims totalling 2,000 million USD
to United States courts.
• In 1988 a U.S. federal judge ordered Amoco Oil Corporation to pay $85.2 million in fines;
$45 million for the costs of the spill and $39 million in interest. In 1992, Amoco agreed to
pay $230 million.
43