environmental technology resources, interstate technology ... conference... · environmental...
TRANSCRIPT
WWW.ITRCWEB.ORG
AdvancingEnvironmentalSolutions
WWW.jrwbioremediation.com
Environmental Technology Resources, Interstate Technology Regulatory Council
Guidance Documents:Technology Transfer Challenges and Solutions
MISSOURI WASTE CONTROL COALITION CONFERENCE
MichaelR.Sieczkowski,CHMMJRWBioremediation,LLC
July18,2017
What is the Interstate Technology Regulatory Council?ITRCisastate-ledcoalitionworkingtoincrease
regulatoryacceptanceofinnovativeenvironmentaltechnologiesandapproaches.At22-yearsold,ITRChasgrownintoanationalorganizationrepresentingall50statesthatbroadensanddeepenstechnicalknowledge,andexpeditesregulatorydecision-making.
MWCC July 2017
ITRCOrganization
ITRC Board of Advisors
Team Leaders/Project Teams Training
ECOS/ERIS ITRC Director
Board of Advisors
Voting Members
Non-Voting Federal Liaisons
Technical Teams Training
State Engagement (POCs) Public and Tribal
StakeholdersIndustry Affiliates
Program
MWCC July 2017
ITRC MissionTodevelopinformationresources andprocesses tobreakdownbarriers totheuseof technicallysoundinnovativesolutions forhealthycommunities,
economy,andenvironment.
MWCC July 2017
ITRCValues§Facilitatebetterdecision-makingbyfosteringtheacceptanceanduseofinnovative solutions§Developsolutionsbyworkingasastate-ledorganizationinpartnershipwiththoseaffectedbytheguidancewe develop§Produceproductsthataregroundedin technicalexcellence§Workwithintegrityinacultureof collaboration§Striveforconsensusindecision-making anddevelopmentof products
MWCC July 2017
2017 ITRC Technical Teams• Stormwater BMPPerformanceTeam• EvaluationofInnovativeMethaneDetectionTechnologies• BioavailabilityinContaminatedSoil• CharacterizationandRemediationinFracturedRock• LNAPLUpdate• QualityConsiderationsforMultipleAspectsofMunitionsResponseSites
• RemediationManagementofComplexSites• TPHRiskEvaluationatPetroleum-ContaminatedSites• KeyInformationNeededtoDevelopStrategiestoAddressEnvironmentalReleasesofPer- andPolyfluoroalkyl Substances(PFASs)NEW
MWCC July 2017
TEAM FORMATION
PROJECT TRANSITION
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
TEAM CLOSURE
TEAM CLOSURE
EXCEPTION
PROJECT START
PRODUCT IMPLEMENTATION:
INITIAL PHASE
PRODUCT IMPLEMENTATION:
FINAL PHASE
PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT
PRODUCT END: CONTINUOUS IMPLEMENTATION
AND OUTREACH
MWCC July 2017
WhatDoesITRC“Produce”
• FactSheets•GuidanceDocuments
• Printeddocuments(mostly-pre2014)• Internetbaseddocuments
• Websites• Webviewabledocuments
• Training• Inpersontrainingsessions• Internetsessions
MWCC July 2017
2016MajorActivities
•Releaseoftwodocuments•Geostatistics• InstitutionalControls
•Hitstowebsite•11,000averagemonthlyuniquevisitors
• Implementedsocialmedia•Currentstats:
• 164Twitterfollowers• 113Facebookfollowers• 917LinkedInfollowers
MWCC July 2017
2017MAJORACTIVITIES
• Anticipatedcompletionof3teamsandreleaseofteamproducts• ComplexSites,FracturedRock,Bioavailability
• 6PFASFactsheetstobereleased• NewGovernance• NewCo-Chairs:
• CherriBasinger,MO• TomHiggins,MN
• NewBoardmembers:• NajiAkladis,ME– AtLarge• SaraPearson,MI- Training
MWCC July 2017
PossibleNewteamsfor2018Minimumof7proposalssubmittedtotheBoard:
SitecharacterizationtoolsRemediationperformanceandinjectionAlternativestoAFFFcontainingPFASDronesEnvironmentalMolecularDiagnosticsSafedrinkingwaterShalereservoirs
MWCC July 2017
2016TrainingActivities
10,387participantsin2016onlinetraining•45onlinecourses•13differenttopics
MWCC July 2017
Trainingclasses:• 3PVIclassesinCO,NJ,
MA- 600attendees• LNAPLclassinGA–
200attendees
ITRCTraining- 1997-2016Over130,000Participants
02,0004,0006,0008,000
10,00012,000
Over 5,500 participants trained so far in 2017
MWCC July 2017
ITRC Training Participation1997 – 2016 – Sector Breakdown
• 74 Training Topics• 816 Classes• 130,516 Participants• Located
• 92% in US• 8% in 75 other
countries
State Local Govt34%
Federal Govt11%
Private Sector49%
All Other6%
MWCC July 2017
OnLineTraining•Geospatial Analysis for Optimization at Environmental Sites
•Long-term Contaminant Management Using Institutional Controls
•Petroleum Vapor Intrusion•Remedy Selection for Contaminated Sediments• Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy• Issues and Options in Human Health Risk Assessment
•Groundwater StatisticsMWCC July 2017
ClassroomTraining•Two-day Classroom Training
• Petroleum Vapor Intrusion: Fundamentals of Screening, Investigation, and Management
MWCC July 2017
PotentialNewTrainingVehicle• ITRC partnership with MWCC to continue the semi-annual MWCC seminar series
• Require approvals from both BODs
• Potential schedule to start spring 2018
MWCC July 2017
Documents:http://www.itrcweb.org/guidance
Membership:http://www.itrcweb.org/Membership/Welcome
Teams:http://www.itrcweb.org/Team
TrainingSchedule:http://www.itrcweb.org/Documents/TeamResources_OutreachMaterials/ITRC-2017-Classes-013017.pdf
IntegratedDNAPLSiteCharacterizationandToolsSelection:http://www.itrcweb.org/DNAPL-ISC_tools-selection
MWCC July 2017
StayUp-To-DatewithITRC
facebook.com/itrcwebtwitter.com/itrcweb linkedin.com/company/itrc
http://itrcweb.orgMWCC July 2017March 2017
THANKSTO:
PatriciaReyes,Director,InterstateTechnologyRegulatoryCouncil,Washington,DC
MaryYelken,CPLP,TheYelken Group,Lincoln,NE
JRWBioremediation,LLC,Lenexa,KS
MWCC July 2017
Tech Transfer: A Case StudyITRC’s role in implementing Geophysical Classification
for Munitions Response
GeophysicalClassification:Buriedmetalitemscanbeclassifiedinthegroundusingdatacollectedbygeophysicalsensorsaseither:1) Potentiallyhazardousmunitionsandexcavatedas
required2) Ornon-hazardousmetalclutter,debris,orgeologythat
canbeleftintheground
MWCC July 2017
RemovalActionCampSibert,Alabama,Site18:• AdvancedgeophysicalclassificationsensordatacollectedusingtheMetalMappersystem
• Sensordatawereprocessedandanalyzedtocategorizetheburiedmetalitemstodetermine1)whichwouldrequireexcavationand2)whichcouldbeleftintheground
Tech Transfer: A Case StudyITRC’s role in implementing Geophysical Classification
for Munitions Response
MWCC July 2017
Benefits:• CostSavings:Comparisonbetweentheclassificationtechniqueand100%excavationofalldetectedburieditemsshowedacostsavingsof48%–55%withtheclassificationtechnique
• ReducedOnsiteScheduleandLandImpact:Siteisahuntingpreservewithfieldsplantedtoattractwildlife.Usingclassificationwouldallowforlessexcavationsforfastercompletionandlessimpactontheland
Tech Transfer: A Case StudyITRC’s role in implementing Geophysical Classification
for Munitions Response