envision part b

7/28/2019 Envision Part b

1/17

3/16/20

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Promoting the Planning, Design, and

Construction of Sustainable Infrastructure:

The Institute for Sustainable

Infrastructures

envision Sustainability Rating System

ACI Fall 2011 Convention

October 16 20, Cincinnati, OHACI

WEB SESSIONS

ACI Web Sessions

ACI is bringing you this Web Session in keeping with its

motto of Advancing Concrete Knowledge. The ideas

expressed, however, are those of the speakers and do not

necessarily reflect the views of ACI or its committees.

Please adjust your audio to an appropriate level at this time.

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

ACI Web Sessions

ACI Web Sessions are recorded at ACI conventions and other

concrete industry events. At regular intervals, a new set of

presentations can be viewed on ACIs website free of charge.

After one week, the presentations will be temporarily

archived on the ACI website or made part of ACIs Online

CEU Program, depending on their content.

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

ACI Online CEU Program

ACI offers an easy-to-use Online CEU Program for anyone

who needs to earn Continuing Education credits.

Once registered, you can download and study

reference material. After passing a

10-question exam on the material, you

will receive a certificate of completion

that you can present to local licensing

agencies.

Visit www.concrete.org/education/edu_online_CEU.htm

for more information.

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

ACI conventions provide a forum for networking, learning the

latest in concrete technology and practices, renewing old

friendships, and making new ones. At each of ACIs two

annual conventions, technical and educational committees

meet to develop the standards, reports, and other documents

necessary to keep abreast of the ever-changing world ofconcrete technology.

With over 1,300 delegates attending each convention, there is

ample opportunity to meet and talk individually with some of

the most prominent persons in the field of concrete

technology. For more information about ACI conventions,

visit www.aciconvention.org.

ACI Conventions

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

ACI Web Sessions

This ACI Web Session includes 2 speakers presenting at the

ACI fall convention held in Cincinnati, OH, October 16 20,

2011.

Additional presentations will be made available in future ACI

Web Sessions.

Please enjoy the presentations.


2/17

3/16/20

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Spring 2012 SeminarsACI/PCA 318-11 Building Code Seminar

Omaha, NEApr 4

Pittsburgh, PAApr 10

New Orleans, LAApr 12

Cleveland, OHApr 25Ft. Myers, FLMay 1

Salt Lake City, UTMay 9

Kansas City, KSMay 23

San Diego, CAMay 31

San Antonio, TXJun 12

Albany, NYJun 14

Concrete Repair BasicsNew Brunswick, NJApr 5

Philadelphia, PAJun 14

For more information, visit ACI Seminars.

Concrete Slabs-on-GroundChicago, ILApr 17

San Francisco, CAApr 24

Denver, COMay 8

Charlotte, NCMay 15Milwaukee, WIJun 5

Troubleshooting Concrete ConstructionDallas, TXMar 22

Seattle, WAApr 11

Nashville, TNApr 18

Boston, MAMay 2

Indianapolis, INMay 16

Atlanta, GAMay 23

Baltimore, MDJun 6

Portland, ORJun 13

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Promoting the Planning, Design, and

Construction of Sustainable Infrastructure:

The Institute for Sustainable

Infrastructures


ACI Fall 2011 Convention

October 16 20, Cincinnati, OH

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Peter Binney, is a professional engineer with over 35 years of

experience in the public and private sector. He specializes in water

resources engineering and has served as the Director of a major

water utility as well as serving clients needs across the United

States and internationally. He holds post graduate degrees in civil

engineering and water resources management. He currently serves as the

director of Sustainable Infrastructure for Merrick & Co. in Aurora Colorado.

For the last two years, he has been working with ASCEs Committee for

Sustainability on the development of the sustainable infrastructure ra ting

system that will be used to guide practitioners and owners in achieving

higher degrees of sustainable performance for civil infrastructure projects. He

is the Chair of the Technical Committee and a Board member of the Institute

for Sustainable Infrastructure.

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Howard B. LaFever, earned his B.S. in Civil Engineering from

Clarkson University and his M.S. in Sanitary Engineering &

Water Resources Planning from Cornell University. He worked

his way up through the engineering ranks, specializing in

wastewater and solid waste services at Stearns & Wheler to his

current position as a Principal with GHD (formerly Stearns & Wheler).

Howard is a licensed professional engineer in NY, PA, VT, OH, and MA, and

is a Board Certified Environmental Engineer (BCEE) of the American

Academy of Environmental Engineers. He is currently serving on the Board

of Directors as Chair-elect for the recently formed Institute for Sustainability

Infrastructure (ISI). He is also a member of the New York State Association

of Solid Waste Management, American Public Works Association (former

Region II Director [DE, PA, NY, NJ]), American Society of Civil Engineers

(Fellow Member), New York State Society of Professional Engineers, past

President of the Central Chapter of ACEC New York, and a member of the

Water Environment Federation.

Sustainable Infrastructure

Rating System - envision

Peter Binney, PE, MASCE

Manager, Technical Development, Institute for Sustainable InfrastructureDirector, Sustainable Infrastructure, Merrick & Company

Howard LaFever, PE, BCEE

Board, Institute for Sustainable InfrastructurePrincipal, GHD

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 11

Topics

What is Sustainability?

Why is it important?

Why do we need a rating system?

What are the benefits? What is ISI? How Does It Interface with Your

Initiatives?

What are ISI products/services?

How do you get involved/get started?

Demonstration

What next?



3/17

3/16/20

What is Sustainability?


Sustainability - Mega Trends

Conservation and Efficiency Measures

Electric vehicles replace gasoline engines

Water use regulations

CO2 regulations

Sustainability


ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

A Life of Its Own ??

15

.


Reliability, resilience, affordable, supportable,

balanced, efficient, effective, adaptability,

durability, ...

COMMUNITY

ENVIRONMENT

ECONOMICS

16

Sustainable Development -Not a trade-off between business and the

environment but a synergy between them


World Population Growth

Human History to 1800s to reach 1 Billion

6.5 Billion+ today

Add 1 billion people every 10-11 years

IndustrialRevolution


4/17

3/16/20

hy Do We Need to Do Anything Else?


Why Do We Need Sustainability?

Falling behind global competitors, t he US struggles to gain

traction in planning and building the critical infrastructure

investments that are necessary to ensure future economicgrowth and suppor t an expanding population ..

Urban Land Institute, Ernst and Young, Infrastructure 2010


We must maintain and improve our infrastructure system to

ignite economic growth,

improve our global competitiveness,

and make it easier for businesses to create jobs .

U.S. Chamber of Commerce, ASCE,U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the National Governors Association, October 2011


.

The Infrastructure Gap - $2.2 Trillion by 2015

Either the country can risk further productivity decline,transportation congestion and potential catastrophesfrom dilapidated systems or it can develop newnetworks to accommodate the expected 100million inpopulation growth over the next generation.

Current infrastructure spending may help fix someoutmoded and crumbling roads, transit lines ad sewagesystems but it offers no long term solutions for keepingthe U.S competitive in global markets or addressingrelated energy consumption and environmentalconcerns.

Ernst and Young, Infrastructure 2009: A Pivot Point

What is Changing?


- 1960

1960 - 2010

2010 -

Infrastructure Expansion

Environmental Protection

Constructive Balance ?Project Delivery ModelsFinancial ConstraintsJobsLoss of Service

Loss of Functionality

How Are We Doing?

ASCE 2009 Report Cardfor AmericasInfrastructure Grade point average: D

C in 1988

5 year investment needed:$2.2 trillion

Grade range C+ for solid waste

D- for drinking water,inland waterways, levees,roads, and wastewater


Not So Well



5/17

3/16/20


Transportation Systems Needs

25 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Energy Infrastructure Needs55 million people affected by the 2003 Black Out

.

NASA Views Before And During Outage

26

Water Scarcity


Things to Do, Places to Go .


Natural Disasters


Katrina

Japan Tsunami

Aging Infrastructure



6/17

3/16/20

Public Ownership of Decisions Delivering Solutions vs Conflict


Economic

Effectiveness


How Do We Get

The Best Bang for the Buckand

Still Deliver

Desired Level of Service

While Protecting

Community Quality of Lifeand

Environmental Values

Changing Financial Inputs


Financing Project delivery Technology Design Informed

Consent Regulatory

Objective

Framework

We Are Building 2050 Today!

ACI Conference - October 19,2011

Range of useful life of

various constructed works

Source: Peakeverything Letsfaceitall...AndWin, MatthisWackernagel(ICLEIWorldCongress2009),

http://www.slideshare.net/ICLEIWorldCongress2009/peakeverythingletsfaceitallmatthiswackernagelicleiworldcongress2009

34

Project Delivery Models Can Change

the Sustainability Equation


Efficiency Effectiveness

We Can Deliver Technical Solutions !



7/17

3/16/20

How Do We Deliver Environmental

and Corporate Responsibility In An

Industrial Society?


LEED Started a New Wave of Innovation in

the Building Industry

Race to the top!

Identify andimplement newtechnologies thatsupport the LEEDbrand

Solar panels

Geothermal heatingand cooling

More

ACIConference October19,2011 38

How Has LEED Transformed the Building

Industry?

Redefined building value

Provided a way for building customers(owners, tenants, residents, the public)to recognize and understand the valueof building green

Low 1st costs low life cycle costs

Developed value metrics

Provided a system for measuring,assessing and publically recognizingbuilding performance

Better LEED-defined performance =higher value

Created the brand

Established a recognized andrespected brand in the building marketforhigh performance buildings


Source: Daniel Goleman, Ecological Intelligence, Broadway Books, New York, 2009

39

WhatAbout Infrastructure?

No overall sustainable infrastructure rating system

Many sector-specific (900+)

Infrastructure presents a different challenge

compared to buildings: Building design and construction - usually controlled by a single

organization

Public Nature of Infrastructure Projects affects/ benefits macroecosystems, communities, and regions; must consider -

Public stakeholder expectations and support;

Environmental responsibility;

Impact on public life;

And, the use of public funds sustainability needs to pay for itself!


Engineers and Construction Industry

Need to Deliver Smart, Green and

Affordable Solutions


What is ISI and what are itsproducts/services?

3/16/201242

envision



8/17

3/16/20

Formation of ISI

All three founding partners committed to sustainabilityand developed a number of tools and resource libraries

APWA Center for Sustainability ASCE Committee on Sustainability

ACEC Green Scorecard

ISI Formation

Leveraging value of a consolidated approach

Creating a framework that should become the Nationalstandard for Sustainable Infrastructure

Create a civil infrastructure uniform framework forsustainability assessments


501 (c ) (3) PartnershipFounding Partners

APWA Center for Sustainability ASCE Committee on Sustainability ACEC Green Scorecard

ISI Formation National Benchmark for Sustainable Infrastructure Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Projects

Focus Project Performance Verification Using CivilInfrastructure Rating System

Sustainable Professional Accreditation

Education and Training


ISI Mission Statement

To provide guidance that can help deliver and transformtomorrows infrastructure [through ISIs products andservices]

Examine issues beyond the traditional discipline ofengineering and consider how financial, political, socialand environmental elements affect sustainability

Serve as an Industry resource to promote sustainabilityin infrastructure development and re-development overthe life-cycle of the natural and built environment


ISI Core Products and Services

Rating System - envision

Assessors Accreditation

Verifier Training and Third Party Verification

Verification of Project Performance - Awards andRecognition Program

Interface of Owners, A/E, Agencies, Practitioners,Stakeholders

Communications/Education on Rating System


Goals for envisionRating System

Can serve as a National Benchmark forSustainable Performance

Should guide practitioners, owners, stakeholders inthe framing of sustainable infrastructure solutions

Sustainability must be affordable ; identifyeconomic performance as well as community andenvironmental protection

Keep it simple, practical, adaptable and usable


Enhancing the Version 1.0 Toolkit

Public Comments

Strategic Alliance with Harvard Zofnass

Harmonization of two rating systems

Collaboration and joint-representation

Alignment with Industry Groups

Alignment with Founding Partner training,education, advocacy, communication

ACI Conference - October 19,2011 48


9/17

3/16/20

Schedule

Public Comment Period Open

Version 2.0 Release in early 2012

Professional Accreditation

Sustainability Professionals (ISI-SP)

Verifiers

Recognition Program (details this Fall)

Training

Membership (Open Currently)


Membership Opportunities

Membership Types

Charter Members Sustaining Members

Other Agencies/Institutions

Visitwww.sustainableinfrastructure.orgfor additional membership details.


How Do ISI and the Concrete Industry

Interface ?

3/16/201251ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 51

CJSI is Providing Critical Input to

Infrastructure Sustainability Assessment


ISI Project

Verification

Industry

BMPs

And

Verifiable

Benefits/

Performance

envision

Sustainable development:

Our greatest challenge & opportunity

Industry-wide issue

Important how outside world views us

Today many different faces and messages

Need one face to the world and common messages

Pool resources to back-up messages

An unprecedented level of Industry segment collaborationrequired


Why a Concrete Joint Sustainability

Initiative? Develop common Industry identity (One face

to the world)

Develop common vision of industrysustainability

Pool resources and minimize duplication

Back-up sustainability

messages with facts

Coordinate communication

of outside messages



10/17

3/16/20

Joint declaration of industry vision

for a sustainable future

Constitutes charter document ofthe Concrete Joint SustainabilityInitiative

Contains 9 declarations

Lists 8 social values of concretestructures

24 industry associations havecurrently signed, with more tocome


Declaration #4: Our integratedthinking will focus on the following social

values provided by concrete structures

1. Resource efficiency2. Safety/protection

3. Financial responsibility

4. Operational continuity

5. Longevity/durability

6. Byproducts reduction

7. Esthetics

8. Societal connectivity


All align withISI KPIs

Current Concrete Joint Sustainability

Initiative actions

Develop and deliver alignment/call-to-action presentationfor within our Industry

Association collaboration to compile and unify industrysustainability messages

Compile/organize supporting facts to back up social values,identify related programs and gaps


Current actions (continued)

ACI to initiate development of 2 sustainable constructionpublications which could lead to more rapid code evolution

PCA/NRMCA to share industry-wide imaging/ brandingsurvey and recommendations

Communication/engagement with additional Industryassociations


envision

The Rating System


Sustainability is not achieved by a uniform model orsingle approach because of the varying contexts,environments, community/ stakeholder/ physical needs;

Technology and performance efficiency are enablers

to achieve desired outcomes but the public interest ismet through behaviors and informed decisions;

Identify the Key Performance Indicators that influenceand measure sustainable performance and can guidecontinuous improvement;

Highlight and reinforce performance improvements

that are balanced and understandable to stakeholders.


Sustainability and Rating Systems?

60


11/17

3/16/20

What Does envision Apply To?


TM

What Is An Effective Rating System?

A rating system :

Creates a framework of objective measures;

Provides guidance that can influence performancegoals and approaches;

Promotes project resilience and strategic focus;

Promotes consensus support to balanced tradeoffsbetween various project attributes and outcomes givenlimits of project context;

The basis for negotiating a constructive outcome interms acceptable to all parties.


Goals for Rating System

envision can be a nationally recognized standard forhigher sustainability performance for civil engineeringinfrastructure (across all civil infrastructure projects);

Rating system should promote transformational approacheswith increased project performance for triple bottom linefactors in addition to technical requirements;

envision should be scalable and broadly applicable

Accommodate sector-specific rating systems that may also

request recognition by ISI through 3rd

party verificationACI Conference - October 19, 2011 63

TM

TM

Key Features

1. Expands the breadth of project contribution tosustainability

2. Identifies infrastructure traps and vulnerabilities3. Expands opportunities and targets for performance

improvement4. Makes restorative an explicit level of performance

achievement5. Rewards focused innovation6. Encourages a shift to a new engineering design and

project delivery paradigm7. Advances sustainability knowledge and education8. Does not assess materials or products


Constructing the Rating System

Should be relevant, supportive, usable and productive E-version, interactive, instructive, outcome-based, process-

supportive, outputs

Should be scalable according to complexity and size Level 1 checklist and self assessment Level 2 comprehensive consideration of multiple criteria and

core system Level 3 focused project assessment (+ operations, existing

facilities) Level 4 multi-attribute, complex, contested, TBL balancing

Agencies, owners, consultants, communities (+/-) shouldbe able to use approach to reach consensus throughinformed decision making


The Value Proposition

Harmonizing multiple approaches to reflect a nationalstandard for approaches and performance

ISI integrity by awarding recognition through third party

assessment and verification

Defensible and rigorous for both advocates and opposers

Support the public policy approach and lead to moreeffective identification, financing, regulatory approval and

delivery of infrastructure solutions



12/17

3/16/20

Creating the Beta-Version

Inventoried the market (900+ rating systems)

Engaged two consultants experienced with FIDIC (PSMII) and CEEQUAL to develop basic framework

ASCE Foundation contributed $300,000 to developmentof rating system

Founder Partners developed goals for a rating system,critical review and development of core concepts, gapidentification, refinement of approaches, products

Collaboration with a number of federal agencies


Framework of Rating Tool

Matrix evaluation of 5 Macro-groups, 10 Primary Criteria(reflect triple bottom line attributes) and relativeperformance

74 Secondary Criteria and narrative guidance

A Sustainability Score and road map

Supports consideration of performance achievement(higher efficiency) as well as process improvement(pathway to supportable and effective approaches)

Peer review ongoing

Needs additional feedback and input from agencies,owners, practitioners, activists, academics .


Performance and Pathway ContributionDoes this project effectively contribute to sustainability?

Performance contribution Sought out all reasonable

opportunities to improvesustainable performance

Raised the bar in one or moredimensions of sustainableperformance

Achieved what was reasonable

Pathway contribution Considers how the project

aligns with overall communityneeds

Enhances quality of life

Useofrecycledconcreteandasphaltinhighwayconstruction

HighwaytrafficcongestionACI Conference - October 19,2011 69

Sustainability Through Project Delivery

Restore

Conventional

Sustain

Improve

DisassemblyDesign Construct O&M Reuse

Projectteam

Ownerorganization

Affected stakeholders

Regulatorybodies

Partnerorganizations

WholeSystemDesignReduce,reuse,recyclePhaseddevelopmentAdaptivePostlife

TeamCharteringUnderstand/ Integrate

CommunityNeeds

DeliverasPartofOwnerOrganization

PartnerwithRegulators

TechnologyAdvancementPerformanceGoals

BillWallace 70SDPerformance&Pathway


Dimensions of Sustainable Performance(FIDIC)

Range of Project Performance

ProjectDelivery

Phase

Degree ofInfluence

Conventional

Improved

Sustainable

Restorative

Project Team

Owner

NGOs

Regulators

Policy

Conventional Designs (Checklists)71




ProjectDelivery

Phase

Degree ofInfluence

Conventional

Improved

Sustainable

Restorative

Project Team

Owner

NGOs

Regulators

Policy

Life Cycle Projects

72


13/17

3/16/20




ProjectDelivery

Phase

Degree ofInfluence

Conventional

Improved

Sustainable

Restorative

Project Team

Owner

NGOs

Regulators

Policy

Sustainable Projects73 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011

Sustainability Performance Goals

SustainabilityPerformance

Environmental Performance

(beyond regulatory requirements)

Social Performance

(beyond typical stakeholder groups)

Economic Performance(beyond conventional PW analysis)

74

Sustainability Vectors

DoingThingsRight

DoingtheRightThings

Sustainable

Design

PerformanceContributions

PathwayContributions

Process/Tools

PerformanceImprovements

TransformProgramDelivery

CollaborativeDelivery

TechnologicalImprovements

Higher

PerformanceGoalsIntegratedSolutions


Performance

Implementation

Operability

Sustainability Mapping

Sustainability

Technical

Economic

Environmental

Social

Life Cycle Cost

EnvironmentalFootprint

ConsumerAcceptance

ProductAvailability

Removal Efficiency

Reliability

Resilience

Service life

Construction scheduleSystem IntegrationContext

Ease of operationMaintenance

ResourceConsumption

Capital CostO&M CostDisposal Cost

Energy UseChemical Use

Solids ResidualLiquids Residual

AestheticsRate Acceptance

Market Availability

CRITERIA OBJECTIVES METRICS

System Components

75 objectives in 10 categories and 34

subcategories

Five degrees of performance achievement

Improved to restorative

Linked to numeric score

Two components of sustainability contribution

Pathway (effectiveness)

Performance (efficiency)

Expanded scope of awards and recognition

Integration with decision-support tools (Stage

4) ; conflict resolution and informed consent

3/16/2012,ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 77

Rating System Primary CriteriaSection Weight (%)

1 Pathway 12.6

2 ProjectStrategy&Management 10.6

3 C omm un it y: Lo ng & Sh or t Te rm E ff ec ts 1 0. 7

4 LandUse&Restoration 8.9

5 Landscapes 7.0

6 Ecology&Biodiversity 8.8

7 WaterResources&Environment 11.5

8 Energy&Carbon 11.7

9 ResourceManagementIncludingWaste 8.2

10 Transportation 10.0

TOTAL 100%ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 78


14/17

3/16/20

Sustainability Rating System:

Community &

StakeholderEngagement

Project

Contributionand Setup

Decision Support:Deciding on the

Right Project

Landscape

Why Infrastructure

SustainabilityImprovement

?

How does it

work?

Background

Case for

Action

System

Overview

Whos

involved?

Key Sources

and

References

Project

Management

Neighborscommunities

Historic

Environment

Land Use

WaterResources

Ecology &

Biodiversity

Energy &

Carbon

Resource

Management

Transport

Guidelines on

Sustainability andInfrastructure

Decision Support:

Project

Performance

S u p po r t I n g M a t e r I a l s

3/16/2012, 79ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 79


What Indicators Promote Sustainability?


LEADERSHIPPromoting: Sound decision making Effective management Value propositions Sourcing Health and safety Life cycle assessment

+

KPIDocumentation and Performance


Characteristics of envision Scalable according to complexity and size One system for all types of civil infrastructure

Stage Description Benefits

1 OverallGuidanceandC he ckl ists P rov id esunderstandingofsustainabilityand

triplebottomlineaccountingand

applicationtoinfrastructureprojects.

SinglePurpose,

local

projects

2 AssessmentandRecognition Stepbystepprocessforownerorengineerto

performselfassessmentand toindicate

areaswhereimprovedbenefitscouldbe

achieved. BasisforISIverification

3 SinglePurposeProjectsandExisting

ProjectAssessment(future)

Largerormorecomplexprojectsinplanning

stagesandwhereindividualareasof

excellencecanbehighlighted.

4 DecisionSupport(future) Allowsbalancingofvariouselementsofa

projecttooptimizeperformanceand

investment.Facilitatesresolutionof

differingopinionsorapproacheswith

stakeholders orregulatoryneeds.ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 83

Basic - Performance that is at/ above conventional

Improved - Indications that superior performance is withinreach.

Superior - Sustainable performance that is noteworthy .

Sustainable - Performance that has achieved essentially zeroimpact.

Restorative - Performance that restores natural or socialsystems.


Five Degrees of Performance

84


15/17

3/16/20


Life Cycle Assessment

.

Conceptual Design Alternatives comparison

Final Design Materials selection, Value engineering

Construction Tabulate quantities, durations

Operations Energy and resource consumption, efficiency audits

Rehabilitation and Betterment Performance improvementsDecommissioning - recycling, reusing, brownfield development

85

Project Phases


Metrics will change as projectmoves from planning throughdesign, construction and

repurposing

Sustainability

Indicators

and Metrics

Change


Plan/Design

Construction

Operation

Decommissioning

How Do We Interpret Sustainable

Performance?

Level of Performance

Basic Improved Superior Susta inab le Restora tive

Criteria

Efficiency

Effectiveness

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10


Project Use of envision and Verification

Professionals should seek training and certification inbroad sustainability principles

Various training opportunities but ISI will certify userscompetence in applying envision tools

Use envision to enhance project performance Owners may apply for recognition of envision

Achievements and performance through third partyverification (Stage 2 and higher applications)

Professional standards requirements for accreditedsustainability professionals and verifiers

TM

TM

TM

TM

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 893/16/2012, 90ACI Conference - October 19,

2011 90


16/17

3/16/20

DEMONSTRATION

ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 91 ACI Conference - October 19, 2011 92


QUESTIONS

envision

www.sustainableinfrastructure.org

Bill Bertera, Executive Director, Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure

[email protected] Binney, Merrick & Co. [email protected], 720-427-6026


1919 - The Pershing Map(emphasis on coastal threats)


Thinking

BIG !!!!



17/17

3/16/20


ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Related Documents

ACI Bookstore

Promoting the Planning, Design, and Construction of Sustainable

Infrastructure: The Institute for Sustainable Infrastructures


envision Sustainability Rating System Concrete Sustainability Forum IV Concrete Sustainability Forum (ACI Fall 2009 Convention), Part 1 Concrete Sustainability Forum (ACI Fall 2009 Convention), Part 2 Concrete Sustainability Forum (ACI Fall 2009 Convention), Part 3 The Sustainable Concrete Guide - Strategies and Examples The Sustainable Concrete Guide Applications ACI Concrete Sustainability eLearning

ACI

WEB SESSIONS

Click on the image below to go to the web page.

Seminar Schedule Bookstore ACI Web Sessions Conventions

Onl ine CEU Program ACI eLearning Concrete Knowledge