enzyme kinetics and associated reactor design: immobilized enzymes
DESCRIPTION
CP504 – Lecture 5. Enzyme kinetics and associated reactor design: Immobilized enzymes. enzyme mobility gets restricted in a fixed space. Immobilized enzyme reactor (example). Recycle packed column reactor . Advantages of immobilized enzymes: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
1
Enzyme kinetics and associated reactor design:
Immobilized enzymes
CP504 – Lecture 5
enzyme mobility gets restricted in a fixed space
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
2
Immobilized enzyme reactor (example)
Recycle packed column reactor
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
3
Advantages of immobilized enzymes: - Easy separation from reaction mixture, providing the ability
to control reaction times and minimize the enzymes lost in the product
- Re-use of enzymes for many reaction cycles, lowering the total production cost of enzyme mediated reactions
- Ability of enzymes to provide pure products
- Possible provision of a better environment for enzyme activity
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
4
Disadvantages of immobilized enzymes: - Problem in diffusional mass transfer
- Enzyme leakage into solution
- Reduced enzyme activity and stability
- Lack of controls on micro environmental conditions
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
5
Methods of immobilization
1) Entrapment Immobilization
2) Surface Immobilization
3) Cross-linking
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
6
1) Entrapment Immobilization
It is the physical enclosure of enzymes in a small space.
- Matrix entrapment (matrices used are polysaccharides, proteins, polymeric materials, activated carbon, porous ceramic and so on)
- Membrane entrapment (microcapsulation or trapped between thin, semi-permeable membranes)
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
7
1) Entrapment Immobilization
Advantage is enzyme is retained.
Disadvantages are- substrate need to diffuse in to access enzyme and
product need to diffuse out - reduced enzyme activity and enzyme stability owing
to the lack of control of micro environmental conditions
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
8
2) Surface Immobilization
- Physical adsorption (Carriers are silica, carbon nanotube, cellulose, and so on; easily desorbed; simple and cheap; enzyme activity unaffected )
- Ionic binding (Carriers are polysaccharides and synthetic polymers having ion-exchange centers)
- Covalent binding (Carriers are polymers containing amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, or phenolic groups; loss of enzyme activity; strong binding of enzymes)
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
9
Methods of immobilization
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
10
3) Cross linking
is to cross link enzyme molecules with each other using agents such as glutaraldehyde.
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
11
Comparison between the methodsCharacteristics Adsorption Covalent
couplingEntrapment Membrane
confinement
Preparation Simple Difficult Difficult Simple
Cost Low High Moderate High
Binding force Variable Strong Weak Strong
Enzyme leakage Yes No Yes No
Applicability Wide Selective Wide Very wide
Running problems High Low High High
Matrix effects Yes Yes Yes No
Large diffusional barriers
No No Yes Yes
Microbial protection No No Yes Yes
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
12
Immobilized enzyme reactor (example)
Recycle packed column reactor
- Allow the reactor to operate at high fluid velocities
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
13
Immobilized enzyme reactor (example)
Fluidized bed reactor - A high viscosity substrate solution
- A gaseous substrate or product in a continuous reaction system - Care must be taken to avoid the destruction and decomposition of immobilized enzymes
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
14
Immobilized enzyme reactor (example)
- An immobilized enzyme tends to decompose upon physical stirring.
- The batch system is generally suitable for the production of rather small amounts of chemicals.
Continuous stirred tank reactor
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
15
Effect of mass-transfer resistance in immobilized enzyme systems:
Mass transfer resistance is present - due to the large particle size of the immobilized enzymes- due to the inclusion of enzymes in polymeric matrix
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
16
Effect of mass-transfer resistance in immobilized enzyme systems:
Mass transfer resistance are divided into the following: - External mass transfer resistance
(during transfer of substrate from the bulk liquid to the relatively unmixed liquid film surrounding the immobilized enzyme andduring diffusion through the relatively unmixed liquid film)
- Intra-particle mass transfer resistance (during diffusion from the surface of the particle to the active site of the enzyme in an inert support)
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
17
External mass-transfer resistance:
Enzyme
Ss
Sb
Liquid Film Thickness, L
Enzyme
Liquid film thickness, L
CSs
CSb
Assumption:- Enzymes are evenly distributed on the surface of a nonporous support material.- All enzyme molecules are equally active.- Substrate diffuses through a thin liquid film surrounding the support surface to reach the reactive surface.- The process of immobilization has not altered the enzyme structure and the M-M kinetic parameters (rmax, KM) are unaltered.
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
18
External mass-transfer resistance:
Enzyme
Ss
Sb
Liquid Film Thickness, L
Enzyme
Liquid film thickness, L
CSs
CSb
Diffusional mass transfer across the liquid film:
liquid mass transfer coefficient (cm/s)
substrate concentration in the bulk solution (mol/cm3)
kL
CSb
JS = kL (CSb – CSs)
substrate concentration at the immobilized enzyme surface (mol/cm3)
CSs
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
19
External mass-transfer resistance:
Enzyme
Ss
Sb
Liquid Film Thickness, L
Enzyme
Liquid film thickness, L
CSs
CSb
At steady state, the reaction rate is equal to the mass-transfer rate:
JS = kL (CSb – CSs) = rmax CSs
KM + CSs
maximum reaction rate per unit of external surface area (e.g. mol/cm2.s)
rmax
is the M-M kinetic constant (e.g. mol/cm3)
KM
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
20
Example 3.4 in Shuler & Kargi:
Consider a system where a flat sheet of polymer coated with enzyme is placed in a stirred beaker. The intrinsic maximum reaction rate of the enzyme is 6 x 10-6 mols/s.mg enzyme. The amount of enzyme bound to the surface has been determined to be maximum 1 x 10-4 mg enzyme/cm2 of support. In solution, the value of KM has been determined to be 2 x 10-3 mol/l. The mass-transfer coefficient can be estimated from standard correlations for stirred vessels. We assume in this case a very poorly mixed system where kL = 4.3 x 10-5 cm/s. What is the reaction rate, when the bulk concentration of the substrate (CSb) is (a) 7 x 10-3 mol/l and (b) 1 x 10-2 mol/l?
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
21
Solution to Example 3.4 in Shuler & Kargi:
Data provided: rmax = 6 x 10-6 x 1 x 10-4 mols/s.cm2
= 6 x 10-10 mols/s.cm2 KM = 2 x 10-3 mol/l = 2 x 10-6 mol/cm3 kL = 4.3 x 10-5 cm/s CSb = 7 x 10-3 mol/l OR 1 x 10-2 mol/l
= 7 x 10-6 mol/cm3 OR 1 x 10-5 mol/cm3
where CSs should be solved for, which can then be used to calculate JS.
Equation to be solved:
JS = kL (CSb – CSs) + rmax CSs
KM + CSs
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
22
Solution to Example 3.4 in Shuler & Kargi:
0.E+00
1.E-10
2.E-10
3.E-10
4.E-10
5.E-10
6.E-10
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01
C_Ss (mol/l)
J_S
or r_
S (m
ol/s
.cm
2 )J_S for part (a)J_S for part (b)r_S
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
23
External mass-transfer resistance:
Non dimensionalizing the above equation, we get
JS = kL (CSb – CSs) = rmax CSs
KM + CSs
where
= β C’Ss
1 + β C’Ss
1 - C’Ss
NDa
rmax / (kL CSb )
C’Ss =
=
CSs / CSb
NDa
β = CSb / KM
is the Damköhler number
is the dimensionless substrate concentration
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
24
Damköhler number (NDa)
NDa = Maximum rate of reactionMaximum rate of diffusion
= rmax
kL CSb
If NDa >> 1, rate of diffusion is slow and therefore the limiting mechanism
If NDa << 1, rate of reaction is slow and therefore the limitingmechanism
If NDa = 1, rates of diffusion and reaction are comparable.
rp = JS = kL (CSb – CSs)
rp = rmax CSs
KM + CSs
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
25
Effectiveness factor (η)
η = actual reaction rate
rate if not slowed by diffusion
η =
rmax CSs
KM + CSs
rmax CSb
KM + CSb
=
β C’Ss
1 + β C’Ss
β1 + β
Effectiveness factor is a function of β and C’Ss
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
26
Internal mass transfer resistance:
Assumption:- Enzyme are uniformly distributed in spherical support particle.- Substrate diffuses through the tortuous pathway among pores to reach the enzyme- Substrate reacts with enzyme on the pore surface -Diffusion and reaction are simultaneous- Reaction kinetics are M-M kinetics
CSs
CSr2
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
27
Diffusion effects in enzymes immobilized in a porous matrix:
Under internal diffusion limitations, the rate per unit volume is expressed in terms of the effectiveness factor as follows:
rS = η rmax’ CSs
KM + CSs
maximum reaction rate per volume of the support
M-M constant
substrate concentration on the surface of the support
rmax’
KM
CSs
η effectiveness factor
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
28
Diffusion effects in enzymes immobilized in a porous matrix:
η Definition of the effectiveness factor
η =reaction rate with intra-particle diffusion limitation
reaction rate without diffusion limitation
For η < 1, the conversion is diffusion limited
For η = 1, the conversion is limited by the reaction rate
Effectiveness factor is a function of β and C’Ss
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
29
Diffusion effects in enzymes immobilized in a porous matrix:
η
φTheoretical relationship between the effectiveness factor (η) and
first-order Thiele’s modulus (φ) for a spherical porous immobilized particle for various values of β, where β is the substrate concentration at the surface divided by M-M constant.
β
Prof. R. Shanthini 30 Sept 2011
30
Diffusion effects in enzymes immobilized in a porous matrix:
Relationship of effectiveness factor (η) with the size of immobilized enzyme particle and enzyme loading