eonardo acabal and ramon nicolas

4
EONARDO ACABAL and RAMON NICOLAS , petitioners, vs. VILLANER ACABAL, EDUARDO ACABAL, SOLOMON ACABAL, GRACE ACABAL, MELBA ACABAL, EVELYN ACABAL, ARMIN ACABAL, RAMIL ACABAL, and BYRON ACABAL , respondents.G.R. No. 148376 - March 31, 2005 – arpio-Mora!es, J . FACTS: "#!e$andro #ca%a! and &e!icidad 'a!asa%as, o(ned a parce! o) !and sit*ated in 'arrio +an !ad, Man$* od, Ne ros rienta!, containin an area o) 18.15 hectares /ore or !ess, descri%ed in +a ec!aration No. 15856. ' a eed o) #%so!*te a!e dated *! 6, 1 71, his parents trans)erred )or 2,000.00 o(nership o) the said !and to i!!aner #ca %a! , (ho (as then /arried to *stiniana 9ipa$an.: n #pri! 1 , 1 0, i!!aner e ec*ted the deed in ;*estion, % (hich the !ot (as trans)erred to his nephe( and odson 9eonardo #ca%a!, (ho !ater so!d it to Ra/on Nico!as. n cto%er 11, 1 3 i!!aner )i!ed a case )or ann*!/ent o) the sa!e to 9eonardo and to Nico!as. i!!aner c!ai/ed that he did not <no( the contents o) the deed he si ned, (hich he c! ai/ed (as a eed o) a!e =ear!ier in the proceedin s he said it (as a 9ease ontract>. +he R+ dis/issed the co/p!aint. i!!aner appea!ed to the #, (ho reversed the R+ and he!d that the deed in ;*estion (as si/*!ated and )ictitio*s. 9eonardo and Ra/on th*s appea!ed to the on certiorari. ISSUE: 1> ?@N the deed is va!id2> ?@N the propert in ;*estion is con$* a! propert HELD/RATIO: 1> AB . +he )ai!*re to den the en*ineness and d*e e ec*tion o) an actiona%!e doc*/ent does not prec!*de a part )ro/ ar *in a ainst it % evidence o) )ra*d, /ista<e, co/pro/ise, pa /ent, stat*te o)

Upload: lyle-murth

Post on 10-Nov-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Case digest property

TRANSCRIPT

EONARDO ACABAL and RAMON NICOLAS, petitioners, vs.VILLANER ACABAL, EDUARDO ACABAL, SOLOMON ACABAL, GRACE ACABAL, MELBA ACABAL, EVELYN ACABAL, ARMIN ACABAL, RAMIL ACABAL, and BYRON ACABAL, respondents.G.R. No. 148376 - March 31, 2005 arpio-Mora!es, J .FACTS: "#!e$andro #ca%a! and &e!icidad 'a!asa%as, o(ned a parce! o) !and sit*ated in 'arrio +an!ad, Man$*od, Neros rienta!, containin an area o) 18.15 hectares /ore or !ess, descri%ed in +a ec!aration No. 15856. ' a eed o) #%so!*te a!e dated *! 6, 171, his parents trans)erred )or 2,000.00 o(nership o) the said !and to i!!aner #ca%a!, (ho (as then /arried to *stiniana 9ipa$an.: n #pri! 1, 10, i!!aner eec*ted the deed in ;*estion, % (hich the !ot (as trans)erred to his nephe( and odson 9eonardo #ca%a!, (ho !ater so!d it to Ra/on Nico!as. n cto%er 11, 13 i!!aner )i!ed a case )or ann*!/ent o) the sa!e to 9eonardo and to Nico!as. i!!aner c!ai/ed that he did not . +he R+ dis/issed the co/p!aint. i!!aner appea!ed to the #, (ho reversed the R+ and he!d that the deed in ;*estion (as si/*!ated and )ictitio*s. 9eonardo and Ra/on th*s appea!ed to the on certiorari.ISSUE:1> ?@N the deed is va!id2> ?@N the propert in ;*estion is con$*a! propertHELD/RATIO: 1> AB. +he )ai!*re to den the en*ineness and d*e eec*tion o) an actiona%!e doc*/ent does not prec!*de a part )ro/ ar*in aainst it % evidence o) )ra*d, /ista o) the s*%$ect propert is concerned