epsiplus: an introduction rob davies epsiplus thematic network co-ordinator public sector...
TRANSCRIPT
ePSIplus: an introduction
Rob DaviesePSIplus Thematic Network Co-ordinator
Public Sector Organisation and Culture ChangePrague, 11 April 2007
funded by eContentPlus
ePSIplus basic data
• ePSIPlus Thematic Network• eContentplus• 950,000 Euro• Start date: 1 September 2006• Duration 30 months
ePSIplus and the Directive
• European Directive 2003/98/EC of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information
• Minimum harmonisation• Access, fairness, transparency, pricing.• ePSIplus is working in the spirit of the Directive
AND its recitals• Better exploitation of market potential of PSI
Chronology of EC actions• Guidelines (1989)• PIRA Study (1999)• PSINet Preparatory Action (2000) • Green Paper• EC Communication (2002)• ePSINet/ePSINet-CEE Accompanying Measures (2003-5)• Policy Group• Directive (2004)• ePSIplus (2006-9)• MEPSIR Study (2006)• Sectoral studies (GI, Met, Legal): to be procured (2007)• Review of Directive (July 2008)
www.ePSIplus.net
Transpositionas at
March 2007
Map view of Member States transposed
EU PSI Directive (broad)
PoliticalReview
2004 2005 2006 2007
1.07.05 Member States
comply
2008 2009PSI directive came
into force31.12.03
Started in 1987 may achieve its objectives by 2017: 30 Years!
We are here!
EC Info Soc monitoring via contracts and projects such as ePSIplus
Estimate as to whenall EU25 will haveTransposed the
PSI Directive
ePSIplus
ePSINet + ePSINetCee
MEPSIR
www.ePSIplus.net
CUPI Report
ePSIplus - within the European context
Five thematic areas
1 Legal and regulatory progress and impact
2 Public sector organisation and culture change
3 Encouraging PSI reuse business
4 The financial impact: pricing and charging
5 Information management, standards and data quality
1 Legal and regulatory progress and impact• Monitoring, sharing experience and analysis of
transposition, compliance, disputes arising• Relationship to other legislation e.g. FOI• Assessment of scope of Directive (culture, education etc)• IPR/copyright• Licensing mechanisms • Exclusive deals• Country Scorecard Target audience• National and European PSI policy makers• PSI regulators/arbitrators• Public and private sector stakeholders
2 Public sector organisation and culture change• Monitoring and review (inc Directive compliance) • Exchange experience and cross fertilize between
countries on practice and problems in implementing Directive
• Promote training and awareness raising approaches• Clarify relationship between eGovernment + PSI re-use• Assess and support appropriate models for PPP
Target audience Central and local government organisations
3 Encouraging PSI re-use business
• Raise awareness of existing cross-border and pan-European products and working business models.
• Inter-sectoral learning: what makes for success• Stimulate training and support facilities for businesses.• Build political support for re-use industries across PSI
sectors (e.g. through an Industry Action Group)
Target audience• Information and content industries• Representative associations
4 The financial impact of the Directive: pricing and charging
• Monitor changes in pricing and charging policies (inc public sector costs and budgets)
• Exchange experience between Member States on reducing barriers to low charges
Target audience• Financial policy makers and managers in central and local
government
5 Information management, standards and data quality • Consensus building on data quality issues• Support for necessary public-private standards
interoperability• Sharing good practice and building interoperability for
discovery and access to PSI
Target audience• Standards/ ‘interoperability framework’ agencies • Industry associations• Public sector information managers• PSI re-use businesses
Roles in the Thematic Network
• MDR: network co-ordinator• Analysts (subcontracted experts)• National Network Members• Stakeholders
– Public and private sector
Analysts
• Record discussions, monitor and move forward thematic agendas, compile analytic reports
• Lead and set agendas for thematic meetings
• Co-ordinate expert participation in each thematic meeting
• An analyst will participate in every national meeting
Network Partners
• One per country: private/public sector mix• Identify experts for Thematic Meetings• Host national meetings• Motivate participation/registration in national
meetings• Supply information on country situation/ cases• 5 have joined Project Management Board
(Ireland, Latvia, Malta, Romania, Slovenia)
Stakeholders
• Database of potential experts/invitees for meetings– 1250 -> 5000
• Register for Newsletter• Participate in discussions• Supply case information
Meetings
• Network kick-off, Prague, 30/31 October
• 15 Thematic cross-border workshops (3 iterative meetings for each of the 5 thematic areas)
• Up to 35 National and Federal level meetings (Months 3-26)
• Final Conference was Month 27….but now May 2008?
ePSIPlus knowledge cycle
Thematic agenda Thematic meeting
National agendas
Analytic updateson themes
National meetingsNational issue updates
Commission interest
• DG INFSO: Digital Libraries and PSI Unit• Wants close co-operation with ePSIplus on 2008
Review of Directive– recommendations from ePSIplus prior to launching
consultation end Feb 2008– May use ePSIplus conference as its key event (June
2008?)– Will participate in some national and thematic
meetings
Website www.epsiplus.net
• Structured access to knowledge and results– by country– by thematic issue– Country Scorecard – Directory of cross-border products
• News• Forum
Today
• Insights and analysis of the progress achieved and still to be made in changing public sector culture and attitudes toward commercial PSI re-use
• What needs to be done?
Some key issues• Relationships between e-Government, PPP and PSI re-
use• Effects of public sector data sharing policies on PSI re-
use (including IPR issues)• Training/support initiatives and infrastructures (e.g.
competence centres)– for central and local government
• Managing consequences of frequent changes in public sector structure for PSI re-use.
• Experiences of local government
Two big questions
• Why should the public sector bother to make a special effort to enable re-use of PSI?
• Who compensates the public sector for loss of revenues?
A one-stop shop on PSI re-use
www.ePSIplus.net