erc case study

5
CASE STUDY: eastern resource centre (link) Group Members: D. Kellett G. Lewis M. Tibballs K. Randall-Dzerdz

Upload: kathryn

Post on 07-Mar-2016

252 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

University of Melbourne Constructing Environments

TRANSCRIPT

case study: eastern resource centre (link)

Group Members: D. Kellett G. Lewis

M. Tibballs K. Randall-Dzerdz

stRuctuRaL systeMsFOUNDATIONS AND FOOTINGS transfer and distribute the load/s of the building to the ground. The Eastern Resource Centre uses a system of concrete footings to support the building loads above (fi g.1).

The PRIMARY STRUCTURE is the structural system that transfers live and static loads through the building and to the ground. The Eastern Resource Centre utilises col-umns (fi g.2) and steel framing to translate the load/s of the structure to the earth.

The SECONDARY STRUCTURE is not directly involved in the load-bearing capacity of the building, and consists of elements such as walls, doors (fi g.3), and windows.

Figure 1: Concrete footings. Diagram: K. Randall-Dzerdz 2013.

Figure 3: Diagramatic door representation.

Figure 2: Primary loadbearing columns.

stRuctuRaL MateRIaLs

The Eastern Resource Centre employs a number of structural materi-als that serve functional and/or aesthetic purposes. Concrete is used in solid walls (1) , footings and slabs (2) as it can withstand the com-pressive loads that press down upon it. Steel is utilised throughout

the building (3), forming much of the primary structure but being left exposed to create a striking architectural feature. Loose insulation has been placed in wall (3) and fl oor cavities to help regulate the in-ternal environment of the space and enhance energy effi ciency. Glass can be seen on the facade of the building, letting in natural light and

protecting the space from the external elements.

1

2

3

4

stRuctuRaL JOINtsMany joints observed on site and in structural drawings have been fi xed joints. These in-clude:

Welded joints (fi g.4) formed though the heat-ing, and subsequent cooing and joining of metals to create an unmovable joint. The prevalence of these fi xings may be due to the widespread use of steel framework that can be appropriately joined using this method.

Bolts (fi g.5) create a fi xed joint where mul-tiple bolts have been used to prevent rota-tional movement that may arise if only one bolt had been set in place. Grout may also be used as a bonding agent in some bolted con-nections (fi g.6).

Figure 5: Bolted fi xing.

Figure 4: Welded joint.

Figure 6: Grout and bolt connection.

eNVIRONMeNtaL aNaLysIs

According to data collected by TATA Steel in the United Kingdom of the carbon dioxide impacts of steel construction (2002), a one-tonne steel plate will produce

close to one tonne of carbon dioxide though the production and manufacturing process. According to these fi gures, the steel used in the construction of the East-

ern Resource Centre would have no doubt contributed a great deal of carbon di-oxide into the atmosphere. However, the strength-to-weight ratio of steel means that much less can be used in many applications compared to other alternatives.

Carbon dioxide would have also been produced in the transportation and con-struction process of all elements, particularly as a by-product of energy consump-

tion. This energy consumed during this process is called embodied energy.

All elements of the structure will have consumed energy in the acquisition, manu-facturing, transport, and construction process. This may be negated however, if the energy saved throughout the lifespan of a structure, by using those certain

materials, is equal or greater than the energy consumed during construction.

In terms of recyclability, concrete, while having a long lifespan, cannot be recy-cled and reduced into its constituent parts. Steel may be melted down again, but

requires and great amount of energy to do so.

As previously stated, the strength-to-weight ratio of steel may be of economic benefi t as less material is required to withstand the same loads. Cheaper materi-als may not be an economically wise choice in the long-run, and may break down

quicker or require more energy and revenue to maintain.

Figure 7: Production of carbon dioxide during transport of materials. Source: Vautoinspect.com n.d.

References:

TATA Steel 2002, The carbon footprint of steel, Available: http://www.tatasteel-construction.com/en/sustainability/car-bon_and_steel/ [2013, September 5].

Vautoinspect.com n.d. ‘How do reduce carbon dioxide emossion’, Available: http://www.vautoinspect.com/how-to-reduce-carbon-dioxide-car-emission/ [2013, September 5].

Note: All structural images are attrib-uted to COX Architcts and Planners