erp myths @ confenis 2012
DESCRIPTION
"ERP Myths 1999 vs. 2012" presentation at Confenis 2012TRANSCRIPT
1
Mythes van ERP implementaties:
Is er iets veranderd sinds 1999?
Martin VAN WUNNIK[ Financial Projects Contractor ]
(+32) 0475/96.95.91 [email protected]
2
23 mei 2012
www.slideshare.net/MvanWunnik
www.arsimaprojects.wordpress.com
4 augustus 1999
3
4
Myth: A complete, detailed planning guarantees
a fluid installation of new software.
5
Reality: The pre-defined planning will not be respected.
What to do: Best-case & Worst-case
‘Switching’ moment‘Boetes’ (bv. extra ‘resources’)
« Partiële leveringen » <> « Prioritaire leveringen »
6
Myth: All aspects of the new software are documented.
7
Reality: The documentation is incomplete.
What to do: Handleidingen +
Finale documentatie set (‘deliverable’)
Intern: Bekwaam persoon, onvoldoende tijd����
Formaten & continuïteit?
8
Myth: The new software works.
9
Reality: The new software does not work.
What to do: Beta-versies / Test / Parametrisatie
���� Bug-fixing procedure
Parallele werelden !(dumps naar Excel)
10
« Scope creep »
Prioriteiten
11
Conclusie
Scenarii + “boetes”
Finale documentatie
Debugging & support structuur
ERP : Standaardpakket ���� Oplossing op maat
Quid met onze bedrijfsprocessen ?!
Extra acronym: BI
12
Nothing, or almost nothing, is so enjoyable to say after a difficult implementation brought to a good end:
“Well, we finally made it…It was a piece of cake”.
“ERP is 20% technologieen 80% change management ”
13
Mythes van ERP implementaties:
Is er iets veranderd sinds 1999?
Martin VAN WUNNIK[ Financial Projects Contractor ]
(+32) 0475/96.95.91 [email protected]