essay on media and it's influence

6
“How media, society, and culture shape my reality” People describe the media as a mirror reflecting society. The reality is that they are a distorting mirror, shaping society - and shaping the way we think (David Couchman). 1 Adorno and Hockenheimer state that modernism is characterized by the everywhere presence of technology and by the commercialization of the human relationship. The big social institutions like family which accommodates individuals and give their life a meaning, is destroyed by the pressure of the working world and the spirit of competition. They cannot be saved from the public universals which invades all the spheres of life with its aggression, including the childhood and entertainment (Marks as cited in Maigret 2010-74). The power of that everywhere imposed culture is not a real culture but a simple domination, which comes from a technical capacity and power to produce a series of radio phonic programs, films and novels, which morals are easily understood and bring spiritual joy. The media create a darkly monitor, darkness that looses you: mass media brings the silence of the mass. They are a kind of anti-Aufklarung- a black sun of 1 http://www.facingthechallenge.org/media.php

Upload: teuta-hajrullahu

Post on 16-Dec-2015

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

This essay is about how media shapes our reality

TRANSCRIPT

How media, society, and culture shape my realityPeople describe the media as a mirror reflecting society. The reality is that they are a distorting mirror, shaping society - and shaping the way we think (David Couchman).[footnoteRef:2] Adorno and Hockenheimer state that modernism is characterized by the everywhere presence of technology and by the commercialization of the human relationship. The big social institutions like family which accommodates individuals and give their life a meaning, is destroyed by the pressure of the working world and the spirit of competition. They cannot be saved from the public universals which invades all the spheres of life with its aggression, including the childhood and entertainment (Marks as cited in Maigret 2010-74). The power of that everywhere imposed culture is not a real culture but a simple domination, which comes from a technical capacity and power to produce a series of radio phonic programs, films and novels, which morals are easily understood and bring spiritual joy. The media create a darkly monitor, darkness that looses you: mass media brings the silence of the mass. They are a kind of anti-Aufklarung- a black sun of modernity. They generalize the absence of critical sense and respect of the real culture by mythification of the human beings.[footnoteRef:3] However, Jackobson (1960), was the first to come up with a communication scheme, which includes the Addresser, the message and the Addressee. According to him, the Addresser sends a message to the Addressee but in order to achieve this, the message has to have a meaning which can be understood by the Addressee and this message should go through a physical channel and a psychological relation which enables communication. [footnoteRef:4] In this case the channel can be any kind of media. This is strictly related with Saussures thought (1916) about the signifier and the signified. According to him the signifier is the same to all but the signified changes according to the culture. He takes the example of onomatopoeia of the crows which in Albanian might be kikiriku and in English coockadoodledoo.[footnoteRef:5] In his book Goodbye information, its media time (2005), Saffo talks about the new forms and the exploding of the cyberspace. According to him, a new area of personal media is being developed, which in difference to the dominating and traditional media enables an interference of the individual and the feeling of creation.[footnoteRef:6] But, there is a dark side to the personal media: as in contrast to the mass media which offers the same content for the whole society, and thus gave the people the feeling of being a part of a group, in todays actuality, the individuals choose from the virtual media exclusively content that are related to their point of view. They isolate themselves from everything that doesnt fit with their point of view. We are risking to become groups defined by common prejudices, which can be easily disconnected of reality. [footnoteRef:7] McLuhan on the other hand points out the thought of some researchers who said that the graphic revolution has caused a shift in our culture from the personal ideals to collective images. This is the same as saying that television and photography have made us think away from the alphabetical and private point of view, to a more complex and general world of the group ionizations.[footnoteRef:8] [2: http://www.facingthechallenge.org/media.php] [3: Maigret, E. , Sociologjia e Komunikimit dhe e mediave, Papirus Publishing, Tirana, 2010, pp. 75] [4: Unversity of Prishtina (2011), Bazat e Komunikimit Masiv, Student Material, Unpublished booklet pp. 14] [5: Ibid. ] [6: Ibid.] [7: Ibid. ] [8: McLuhan, M. Instrumentat e komunikimit, mediat si nje zgjatim i njeriut, Instituti i Dialogut dhe Komunikimit, Tirana, 2004 pp.255]

If we take as an example of shaping our reality the media of television, than we might take into consideration the theory of Marshall McLuhan who says that the message itself is the medium because the meaning of the message is not the media but the way we use that message. He considers that media is an overstretch of the human senses. It, thus, depends on the individual and how he/she percepts the message. [footnoteRef:9]Just like Saussure tells us about the signifier and signified. McLuhan, turns into a prophet, when he warns us about the revolution that television, the multi senses medium, will bring to us and thus make us more stimulated and more generalized about the conscious, by favoring a wish to take part in a common culture, without boundaries, which he calls a global country.[footnoteRef:10] With the world turning into a global country, we are now able to learn about new cultures and about the world that surrounds us. This broadens our horizons, but there is still the risk of manipulating of the media, since the audience might have a little knowledge about these cultures. [9: McLuhan, M. Instrumentat e komunikimit, mediat si nje zgjatim i njeriut, Instituti i Dialogut dhe Komunikimit, Tirana, 2004 pp.13 ] [10: Maigret, E. , Sociologjia e Komunikimit dhe e mediave, Papirus Publishing, Tirana, 2010, pp. 114]

Now, lets take the example of how commercials shape our reality. Arnold Toynbee, who is a voice of human intellectual, even though living a world of commercials says that Personally, I am not affected by the commercials (Toynbee, as cited by McLuhan 2010-26). However, we might be witnesses of how commercials tend to create stereotypes of different people and things. For example, the commercial about Kosovo, the young Europeans was considered to be a stereotype of the youth. In the visual aspect, through the image of young kosovars, the metaphor of age turns into a metonymy, in the webpage or in the promotional commercial of this campaign. Youngsters of two sexes are chosen, who look handsome and with big life accomplishments, with great knowledge and interesting hobbies, just to transmit the stereotype of beauty and youth in contrast to the daily and routine one. Roland Bart (1970), points out the importance of the good interpreted message, which are a connection and push the audience towards a certain meaning among other meanings of the visual part. With other words, the modern image of youngsters of a high social level, is not enough and doesnt tell us anything about the identity and the Kosovar nation. In conclusion, living in a world with a raising importance of mass media, we have to take into consideration the fact how media affects us and how it shapes our reality. When McLuhan warned us about the revolution of the television, he was seen as a heretic, but nowadays everything is possible. But with the rise of the mass media, the level of knowledge rises too. It is hard in a modern world to fool a person with high knowledge, but there is the risk of gaining a false knowledge from the media. There is always the risk of manipulation, even at a very low level. This is the sphere which needs to be studied further in order to see in what certain ways media can manipulate with us.