estimated oral reading fluency a new measure in star-el and star reading
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Estimated Oral Reading Fluency
A New Measure in STAR-EL
and STAR Reading
![Page 2: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
It’s all about correlations!
• The link/correlation between fluency and reading comprehension is well documented.
• Measures of fluency were first used as a proxy for measuring comprehension.
• Reading First and DIBELS have placed great emphasis on fluency.
![Page 3: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
STAR and Est. ORF
• Resulted from a correlational study looking at– STAR (EL and Reading) scores– and DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency
• Statistically HUGE sample– N=12,220
![Page 4: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Wow! What a correlation!
![Page 5: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Wow! What a correlation!
![Page 6: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Things to point out
G4 – R=0.71
G3 – R=0.78
G2 – R=0.84
G1- R=0.87
![Page 7: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Interpreting a Correlation
• Can be positive or negative• 0.0 = no correlation• 1.0 = complete, 1-to-1 correlation• Correlations are deemed “statistically
significant” at about 0.3, depending on the sample size (N)
• To turn a correlation into a more easily understood framework, square it. The result then represents, roughly, the percentage of the time that you could correctly accurately predict one measure with the other.
![Page 8: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Things to point out
• G4 – R=0.71
• G3 – R=0.78
• G2 – R=0.84
• G1- R=0.87
![Page 9: Estimated Oral Reading Fluency A New Measure in STAR-EL and STAR Reading](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/551584de55034691418b5762/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
A Powerful Correlation!
• 0.87 x 0.87 = 0.756– With one measure (STAR scale score or
DORF) you could correctly accurately predict the other measure 75.6% of the time.
• Remember this formula,
I
C