estimates of intra-beam scattering in abs
DESCRIPTION
Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS. University of Ferrara and INFN Ferrara. M. Stancari , S. Atutov, L. Barion, M. Capiluppi, M. Contalbrigo, G. Ciullo, P.F. Dalpiaz, F.Giordano, P. Lenisa, M. Statera, M. Wang. OUTLINE Motivation (why?) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS
M. Stancari, S. Atutov, L. Barion, M. Capiluppi, M. Contalbrigo, G. Ciullo, P.F. Dalpiaz,
F.Giordano, P. Lenisa, M. Statera, M. Wang
University of Ferrara and INFN Ferrara
OUTLINE1. Motivation (why?)2. Formula for estimating intra-beam scattering (what?)3. Comparison of estimates with measurements (does it
work?)
![Page 2: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ABS Intensity
( ) ( )AtfQk
Q inout -124
×××= α
kk number of selected states (1 or 2) number of selected states (1 or 2)
dissociation at nozzle exitdissociation at nozzle exit
QQinin input flux input flux
ff fraction of atoms entering the first magnet fraction of atoms entering the first magnet
tt magnet transmission, calculated with ray-tracing code magnet transmission, calculated with ray-tracing code
AA attenuation factor attenuation factor
![Page 3: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Current Situation
Hermes Nov. IUCF ANKE RHIC
Qin (mbar l/s) 1.5 0.6 1.7 1.0 1.0
Bpt (T) 1.5 3.2 1.5 1.7 1.5
dmag (cm) 0.86 1.4 1.04 1.0 1.04
vdrift (m/s) 1953 1750 1494 1778 ~1530
Tbeam (K) 25.0 30.0 16.5 20.3 ~18
length (m) 1.16 1.40 0.99 1.24 1.37
dct (cm) 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Qout (atoms/s) 6.8x1016 6.7x1016 7.8x1016 7.5x1016 12.4x1016
![Page 4: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HYPOTHESIS: the beam density has an upper limit due to intra-beam scattering(IBS)
POSSIBLE WAY TO INCREASE INTENSITY: increase the transverse beam size while keeping the density constant
A method for estimating IBS is essential to work near this limit.
Parallel beam
slowfast
![Page 5: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Cross Section Definition
(for two intersecting beams)
dv = Number of collisions in time dt and volume dV
n1,n2 = Beam densities
Vrel = Relative velocity of the two beams
dVdtdv relvnnσ 21
21 v-vv =rel
( ) ( )221
2
21 vxv-v-vv
=rel
(Landau and Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, p. 34, 1975 English edition)
• v1||v2:
• General:
![Page 6: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Calculation of IBS losses
dVdtdv relvnσ 2=For scattering within a beam:
Analytical solution, if:
•v1 and v2 co-linear
•constant transverse beam size Am
2kT~v2vΔ beam
rms~
dzdt
dd 2
2mean
Φv
vΔ-2σ-2Φ ==
ν
( )00
1)(
ΦΦ
Φαz
z +=
σα 2meanv
vΔ=
Steffens PST97
![Page 7: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Simple Example
Remaining flux for r<= 5 mm Diverging beam from molecular-like starting generator and 2mm nozzlev/v = 0.3
Random point inside nozzle
Isotropic direction (random cos)
![Page 8: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Fast Numerical Solution
• Begin with a starting generator.
• Use tracks to calculate the beam density in the absence of collisions.
• Calculate the losses progressively in z.
Approximations:• Uniform transverse beam density • Co-linear velocities• is temperature (relative-velocity) independent
21 v-vv
=rel
)(),,( znzrn =φ
dzndn 2
meanv
vΔ-2σ=
![Page 9: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
)-1(' dnnn ii =
rdr2
1
v
1
N
1∝ ∑
π
Calculate n0(z), the nominal beam density without scattering, by counting tracks that remain within the acceptance r<5mm
For each piece dzi, reduce the nominal density by the cumulative loss until that point
Calculate the losses within dz, subtract them from ni to get ni` and add them to the cumulative sum
dzndn ii2
meanv
vΔ-2σ=
ii
ii n
n
nn ,0
1-0,
1-'=
Cumulative loss
Density reduced by scattering
![Page 10: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Experimental Tests
1. Dedicated test bench measurements with molecular beams and no magnets
2. Compare with HERMES measurement of IBS in the second magnet chamber
3. Calculate HERMES ABS intensity including the attenuation and compare with measurement
![Page 11: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Test Bench
nozzle skimmer c. tube QMA
Position (mm) 0 15 800 ~2000Diameter (mm) 4 6 10 -
![Page 12: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Molecular Beam Measurements
![Page 13: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Velocity Distribution Measurement
TIME OF FLIGHT
To be improved:v and vmean have 10-20% error and one value is used for all fluxes
FITTED PARAMETERS
![Page 14: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Attenuation Prediction
MEASURED CALCULATED
2-14H2-H2 cm 2.0x10=effσ
![Page 15: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Application to HERMES
Total density
Envelope density
∑
1 1 1
N v 2 rdr
Sum over tracksthat pass through dr
Total number of tracks
![Page 16: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Weighted average density:
env all
env
( , ) ( , )( )
( , )
n z r n z r dAn z
n z r dA
Survival Fraction:
)(
)('..
0 zn
znfs =
![Page 17: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Comparison with measurements
Note that IBS measurement is in a region of converging beam, while calculation assumes co-linear velocity vectors.
Reasonable agreement! 3x10-14 cm2
PRA 60 2188 (1999)(calculation)
![Page 18: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
What could explain the difference?
Formula assumes that vrel=v1-v2, and this neglects the convergent/divergent nature of the beam Formula assumes that v is constant for the entire length of the beam
( ) ( )
sin)v-(v
vv-)cos-1(
)v-(v
v2v1)v-(v=
vxv-v-vv
22
21
22
21
221
2121
2
21
2
21
θθ ΔΔ+
=
rel
![Page 19: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conclusions
• The parallel beam equation has been freed from the assumption of constant transverse beam size.
• The new equation reproduces molecular beam measurements reasonably well. Some more work remains to be done on velocity measurements and RGA corrections.
• The large losses from IBS measured by HERMES in the second half of the ABS are incompatible with the overall losses in the system, given the current assumptions. Predictions can be improved by introducing a z dependence into v to account for changing velocity distribution and/or convergence angle.
• This attenuation calculation can be done in 1-2 minutes after the average density is obtained, and is thus suitable for magnet parameter optimization
![Page 20: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Uncertainties
• Starting Generator: E2% on loss– Assumed that tracks with cos>0.1 leave beam
instantly (underestimate losses immediately after nozzle)
• Velocity Distribution (mol. beams): E15% on cross section
• Neglecting RGA ???
![Page 21: Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052401/56814e00550346895dbb6c75/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)