estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques
DESCRIPTION
Polar Ice Sheets and Ice Shelves: Mass Balance, Uncertainties, and Potential Improvements Robert H Thomas…etc. Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques. Mass-budget , compares total snow accumulation with losses by ice discharge and melt runoff - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Polar Ice Sheets and Ice Shelves:Mass Balance, Uncertainties, and
Potential Improvements
Robert H Thomas…etc
![Page 2: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Sea-level equivalents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1
Volume (V); Accumulation (A); Contribution (C)
Perc
enta
ge
V
V
V
A A
A
C
C
C
"Small Glaciers"
Greenland
Antarctica
![Page 3: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Estimating ice-sheet mass balance:techniques
• Mass-budget, compares total snow accumulation with losses by ice discharge and melt runoff
• Repeated altimetry, to estimate volume changes
• Temporal changes in gravity, to infer mass changes
![Page 4: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mass budget: uncertainties
Antarctica Greenland
(Gt a-1)
Snowfall + 130 (7%) + 25 (5%)
Ice flow + 93 (5%) + 25 (5%)
Melt runoff Very small + 30 (10%)
Mass balance
(mm/yr SLE)+ 160
(+ 0.5)
+ 46
(+ 0.15)
![Page 5: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Altimetry: uncertainties
SRALT ICESat ATM
Topography effects
Laser pointing,
scattering, saturation
Changing dielectrics
Spatial/temporal cover
(clouds)
Basal uplift
Changing snow-densification rates
![Page 6: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
GRACE: uncertainties
Measurement errors
Spill-over effects
Atmosphere Basal uplift
Greenland Small
(few Gt a-1)
Very Small + ~12 Gt a-1
Antarctica
*V & W# R et al
+ ~13 Gt a-1 + ~9 Gt a-1 + ~72 Gt a-1*
+ ~25 Gt a-1 #
Low-resolution results refer to entire ice sheets, but are seriously limited by short temporal coverage
![Page 7: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Greenland Ice Sheet: rates of surface-elevation change (dS/dt)Above (red), and below (blue) ~ 2000-m elevation
![Page 9: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Greenland Mass Balance
![Page 10: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
____________________________________________________________________ ERS SRALT ATM(5) ICESat/ATM Interval: 1992-2003(8) 1992-2002(9) 1993/4-98/9 1993/4-2004 1998/9-2004 _____________________________________________________________________ Elevation (m) >2000 +65+/-4 +48+/-2 + 7+/-10 + 24+/-10 +38+/-10 <2000 +25+/-7 -14+/-12 - 77+/-17 -153+/-17 -212+/-17 >1500 +64+/-5 +42+/-5 - 2+/-10 + 12+/-10 + 16+/-10 <1500 -20+/-9 -56+/-14 -120+/-30 -257+/-30 -363+/-30 All +54+/-2 +27+/-3 - 30+/-11 - 45+/-11 - 56+/-11 ________________________________________________________________________ Table I: Rates of surface-elevation change (dS/dt) in mm/yr derived from ERS data compared with those from laser-altimeter surveys.
![Page 11: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ERS wavefront over Jakobshavn
![Page 13: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Antarctic Surface Elevation Change
PIG
AP
LIS
RIS
FRIS
![Page 18: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Crane Glacier after Larsen breakup
airborne lidar profiles measured in 2002 &
2004
![Page 19: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Antarctic ice-sheet mass balance
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Observation Period
Rat
e of
mas
s in
crea
se (G
t/yr)
Orange: Zwally Blue: GRACE Black: Rignot
![Page 20: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Recent mass-balance of Greenland and Antarctica.
Greenland Antarctica
Area (M km2)
1.7 12.3
Volume (M km3)*
2.9(7 m SLE)
24.7(57 m SLE)
Total accumuln. (Gt a-1)#
500(1.4 mm SLE)
1850(5.1 mm SLE)
Mass Balance Since ~1990: Thickening above 2000 m, at an accelerating rate; thinning at lower elevations, also accelerating to cause a net loss from the ice sheet of perhaps > 100 Gt a-1 after 2000.
Since early 1990s: slow thickening in central regions and southern Antarctic Peninsula; localized thinning at accelerating rates of glaciers in Antarctic Peninsula and Amundsen Sea region. Probable net loss, but close to balance.
![Page 21: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Causes
o post-glacial memoryo variability/trends in snowfall/meltingo changes in glacier velocities
- ice shelves- basal lubrication- ????
![Page 22: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Sea-level equivalents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1
Volume (V); Accumulation (A); Contribution (C)
Perc
enta
ge
V
V
V
A A
A
C
C
C
"Small Glaciers"
Greenland
Antarctica
![Page 23: Estimating ice-sheet mass balance: techniques](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081514/568131e0550346895d98470d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sea-level change and the cryosphere, June 2006QUESTION ACTION
-How long will glacier acceleration continue,
resulting from existing perturbations?
- Extend time series of observations- Model development and comparison with truth
- Relative importance of ice-shelf weakening and melt-water lubrication? - As above plus field measurements - East Antarctica: is this also vulnerable to
“perturbation weakening”?
- Remote-sensing surveys, and time series to identify current status
- Why are ice shelves thinning? - Ocean measurements near/beneath ice shelves
- Model development and comparison with truth
- Possible causes for ice-shelf breakup? - Field observations and modeling - Importance of oscillations and trends in surface accumulation? - Ice cores, accumulation radar, and modeling - Quantify the impact of changes in summer melt rates?
- AWS, field work including percolation, and modeling
- Relationship to the “Big Picture”: the link to prescribed scenarios of future climate change
- Climate-warming scenarios must include parameters important to the ice sheets: accumulation; summer temperatures; ocean conditions near ice sheets and beneath ice shelves