etext of menexenus

Upload: senadbey

Post on 03-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    1/32

    *******The Project Gutenberg Etext of Menexenus, by Plato*******#23 in our series by Plato

    Copyright las are changing all o!er the orl", be sure to checthe copyright las for your country before posting these files$$

    Please tae a loo at the i%portant infor%ation in this hea"er&'e encourage you to eep this file on your on "is, eeping anelectronic path open for the next rea"ers& (o not re%o!e this&

    **'elco%e To The 'orl" of )ree Plain anilla Electronic Texts**

    **Etexts +ea"able y oth -u%ans an" y Co%puters, .ince /01/**

    *These Etexts Prepare" y -un"re"s of olunteers an" (onations*

    nfor%ation on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, an"further infor%ation is inclu"e" belo& 'e nee" your "onations&

    Menexenus

    by Plato

    Translate" by enja%in oett

    March, /000 4Etext #/5627

    *******The Project Gutenberg Etext of Menexenus, by Plato*************This file shoul" be na%e" /%nxns8&txt or %nxns/8&9ip******

    Correcte" E(T:;. of our etexts get a ne ;sscher ?asschers@aia&net&auA

    Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually create" fro% %ultiple e"itions,

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    2/32

    all of hich are in the Public (o%ain in the

    preli%inary !ersion %ay often be poste" for suggestion, co%%entan" e"iting by those ho ish to "o so& To be sure you ha!e an

    up to "ate first e"ition 4xxxxx/8x&xxx7 please chec file si9esin the first ee of the next %onth& .ince our ftp progra% hasa bug in it that scra%bles the "ate 4trie" to fix an" faile"7 aloo at the file si9e ill ha!e to "o, but e ill try to see ane copy has at least one byte %ore or less&

    nfor%ation about Project Gutenberg one pageD

    'e pro"uce about to %illion "ollars for each hour e or& Thefifty hours is one conser!ati!e esti%ate for ho long it e taeto get any etext selecte", entere", proofrea", e"ite", copyrightsearche" an" analy9e", the copyright letters ritten, etc& This

    projecte" au"ience is one hun"re" %illion rea"ers& f our !alueper text is no%inally esti%ate" at one "ollar then e pro"uce 2%illion "ollars per hour this year as e release thirtyFsix textfiles per %onth, or 32 %ore Etexts in /000 for a total of 2888Hf these reach just /8I of the co%puteri9e" population, then thetotal shoul" reach o!er 288 billion Etexts gi!en aay this year&

    The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Gi!e >ay :ne Trillion Etext)iles by the (ece%ber 3/, 288/& 4/8,888 x /88,888,888JTrillion7This is ten thousan" titles each to one hun"re" %illion rea"ers,hich is only KLI of the present nu%ber of co%puter users&

    >t our re!ise" rates of pro"uction, e ill reach only oneFthir"

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    3/32

    of that goal by the en" of 288/, or about 3,333 Etexts unless e%anage to get so%e real fun"ing currently our fun"ing is %ostlyfro% Michael -artNs salary at CarnegieFMellon

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    4/32

    Mac users, "o ;:T point an" clic, typing ors better&

    Exa%ple )TP sessionB

    ftp sunsite&unc&e"uloginB anony%ous

    passor"B your@loginc" pub"ocsboosgutenbergc" etext08 through etext00"ir 4to see files7get or %get 4to get files& & &set bin for 9ip files7GET G+T**T-E .M>== P+;T$**):+ P;ETERT.**.T>+T***'hy is this O.%all Print$O state%ent hereS Qou noB layers&They tell us you %ight sue us if there is so%ething rong ithyour copy of this etext, e!en if you got it for free fro%so%eone other than us, an" e!en if hatNs rong is not ourfault& .o, a%ong other things, this O.%all Print$O state%ent"isclai%s %ost of our liability to you& t also tells you hoyou can "istribute copies of this etext if you ant to&

    *E):+E$* Q:< ( T-. ETERTy using or rea"ing any part of this P+:ECT G

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    5/32

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    6/32

    on a physical %e"iu%, you %ust return it ith your note, an"such person %ay choose to alternati!ely gi!e you a replace%entcopy& f you recei!e" it electronically, such person %aychoose to alternati!ely gi!e you a secon" opportunity torecei!e it electronically&

    T-. ETERT . :T-E+'.E P+:(E( T: Q:< O>.F.O& ;::T-E+'>++>;TE. :) >;Q V;(, ERP+E.. :+ MP=E(, >+E M>(ET: Q:< >.T: T-E ETERT :+ >;Q ME(Q E :;, ;C=

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    7/32

    inclu"ing any for% resulting fro% con!ersion by or" proF cessing or hypertext softare, but only so long as *ET-E+*B

    4*7 The etext, hen "isplaye", is clearly rea"able, an" "oes *not* contain characters other than those inten"e" by the author of the or, although til"e KD, asteris *D an" un"erline WD characters %ay be use" to con!ey punctuation inten"e" by the author, an" a""itional characters %ay be use" to in"icate hypertext lins :+

    4*7 The etext %ay be rea"ily con!erte" by the rea"er at no expense into plain >.C, EC(C or eui!alent

    for% by the progra% that "isplays the etext as is the case, for instance, ith %ost or" processorsD :+

    4*7 Qou pro!i"e, or agree to also pro!i"e on reuest at no a""itional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the etext in its original plain >.C for% or in EC(C or other eui!alent proprietary for%D&

    427 -onor the etext refun" an" replace%ent pro!isions of this O.%all Print$O state%ent&

    437 Pay a tra"e%ar license fee to the Project of 28I of the net profits you "eri!e calculate" using the %etho" you alrea"y use to calculate your applicable taxes& f you "onNt "eri!e profits, no royalty is "ue& +oyalties are payable to OProject Gutenberg >ssociationCarnegieFMellon ;T* T: .E;( M:;EQ EE; ) Q:< (:;NT->E T:SThe Project gratefully accepts contributions in %oney, ti%e,scanning %achines, :C+ softare, public "o%ain etexts, royaltyfree copyright licenses, an" e!ery other sort of contribution

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    8/32

    you can thin of& Money shoul" be pai" to OProject Gutenberg>ssociation CarnegieFMellon == P+;T$ ):+ P;ETERT.*er&8&20&03*E;(*

    This etext as prepare" by .ue >sscher ?asschers@aia&net&auA

    ME;ERE;ppen"ix D

    Translate" by enja%in oett

    >PPE;(R &

    t see%s i%possible to separate by any exact line the genuine ritings ofPlato fro% the spurious& The only external e!i"ence to the% hich is of%uch !alue is that of >ristotle for the >lexan"rian catalogues of a

    century later inclu"e %anifest forgeries& E!en the !alue of the>ristotelian authority is a goo" "eal i%paire" by the uncertaintyconcerning the "ate an" authorship of the ritings hich are ascribe" tohi%& >n" se!eral of the citations of >ristotle o%it the na%e of Plato, an"so%e of the% o%it the na%e of the "ialogue fro% hich they are taen&Prior, hoe!er, to the enuiry about the ritings of a particular author,general consi"erations hich eually affect all e!i"ence to the genuineness

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    9/32

    of ancient ritings are the folloingB .horter ors are %ore liely toha!e been forge", or to ha!e recei!e" an erroneous "esignation, than longerones an" so%e in"s of co%position, such as epistles or panegyricalorations, are %ore liable to suspicion than others those, again, hichha!e a taste of sophistry in the%, or the ring of a later age, or theslighter character of a rhetorical exercise, or in hich a %oti!e or so%eaffinity to spurious ritings can be "etecte", or hich see% to ha!eoriginate" in a na%e or state%ent really occurring in so%e classicalauthor, are also of "oubtful cre"it hile there is no instance of anyancient riting pro!e" to be a forgery, hich co%bines excellence ithlength& > really great an" original riter oul" ha!e no object infathering his ors on Plato an" to the forger or i%itator, the NliteraryhacN of >lexan"ria an" >thens, the Go"s "i" not grant originality orgenius& )urther, in atte%pting to balance the e!i"ence for an" against a

    Platonic "ialogue, e %ust not forget that the for% of the Platonic ritingas co%%on to se!eral of his conte%poraries& >eschines, Eucli", Phae"o,>ntisthenes, an" in the next generation >ristotle, are all sai" to ha!eco%pose" "ialogues an" %istaes of na%es are !ery liely to ha!eoccurre"&Gree literature in the thir" century before Christ as al%ost as!olu%inous as our on, an" ithout the safeguar"s of regular publication,or printing, or bin"ing, or e!en of "istinct titles& >n unnon ritingas naturally attribute" to a non riter hose ors bore the sa%echaracter an" the na%e once appen"e" easily obtaine" authority& >ten"ency %ay also be obser!e" to blen" the ors an" opinions of the%asterith those of his scholars& To a later Platonist, the "ifference beteenPlato an" his i%itators as not so perceptible as to oursel!es& TheMe%orabilia of Renophon an" the (ialogues of Plato are but a part of aconsi"erable .ocratic literature hich has passe" aay& >n" e %ustconsi"er ho e shoul" regar" the uestion of the genuineness of a

    particular riting, if this lost literature ha" been preser!e" to us&

    These consi"erations lea" us to a"opt the folloing criteria ofgenuinenessB /D That is %ost certainly PlatoNs hich >ristotle attributesto hi% by na%e, hich 2D is of consi"erable length, of 3D greatexcellence, an" also D in har%ony ith the general spirit of the Platonicritings& ut the testi%ony of >ristotle cannot alays be "istinguishe"fro% that of a later age see abo!eD an" has !arious "egrees ofi%portance& Those ritings hich he cites ithout %entioning Plato, un"er

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    10/32

    their on na%es, e&g& the -ippias, the )uneral :ration, the Phae"o, etc&,ha!e an inferior "egree of e!i"ence in their fa!our& They %ay ha!e beensuppose" by hi% to be the ritings of another, although in the case ofreally great ors, e&g& the Phae"o, this is not cre"ible those againhich are uote" but not na%e", are still %ore "efecti!e in their externalcre"entials& There %ay be also a possibility that >ristotle as %istaen,or %ay ha!e confuse" the %aster an" his scholars in the case of a shortriting but this is inconcei!able about a %ore i%portant or, e&g& the=as, especially hen e re%e%ber that he as li!ing at >thens, an" afreuenter of the gro!es of the >ca"e%y, "uring the last tenty years ofPlatoNs life& ;or %ust e forget that in all his nu%erous citations fro%the Platonic ritings he ne!er attributes any passage foun" in the extant"ialogues to any one but Plato& >n" lastly, e %ay re%ar that one or togreat ritings, such as the Par%eni"es an" the Politicus, hich are holly

    "e!oi" of >ristotelian /D cre"entials %ay be fairly attribute" to Plato,on the groun" of 2D length, 3D excellence, an" D accor"ance ith thegeneral spirit of his ritings& n"ee" the greater part of the e!i"encefor the genuineness of ancient Gree authors %ay be su%%e" up un"er tohea"s onlyB /D excellence an" 2D unifor%ity of tra"itionFFa in" ofe!i"ence, hich though in %any cases sufficient, is of inferior !alue&

    Procee"ing upon these principles e appear to arri!e at the conclusion thatnineteenFtentieths of all the ritings hich ha!e e!er been ascribe" toPlato, are un"oubte"ly genuine& There is another portion of the%,inclu"ing the Epistles, the Epino%is, the "ialogues rejecte" by theancients the%sel!es, na%ely, the >xiochus, (e justo, (e !irtute,(e%o"ocus,.isyphus, Eryxias, hich on groun"s, both of internal an" externale!i"ence, e are able ith eual certainty to reject& ut there stillre%ains a s%all portion of hich e are unable to affir% either that theyare genuine or spurious& They %ay ha!e been ritten in youth, or possiblylie the ors of so%e painters, %ay be partly or holly the co%positionsof pupils or they %ay ha!e been the ritings of so%e conte%porary

    transferre" by acci"ent to the %ore celebrate" na%e of Plato, or of so%ePlatonist in the next generation ho aspire" to i%itate his %aster& ;otthat on groun"s either of language or philosophy e shoul" lightly rejectthe%& .o%e "ifference of style, or inferiority of execution, orinconsistency of thought, can har"ly be consi"ere" "ecisi!e of theirspurious character& )or ho alays "oes justice to hi%self, or ho ritesith eual care at all ti%esS Certainly not Plato, ho exhibits the

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    11/32

    greatest "ifferences in "ra%atic poer, in the for%ation of sentences, an"in the use of or"s, if his earlier ritings are co%pare" ith his laterones, say the Protagoras or Phae"rus ith the =as& :r ho can beexpecte"to thin in the sa%e %anner "uring a perio" of authorship exten"ing o!erabo!e fifty years, in an age of great intellectual acti!ity, as ell as of

    political an" literary transitionS Certainly not Plato, hose earlierritings are separate" fro% his later ones by as i"e an inter!al of

    philosophical speculation as that hich separates his later ritings fro%>ristotle&

    The "ialogues hich ha!e been translate" in the first >ppen"ix, an" hichappear to ha!e the next clai% to genuineness a%ong the Platonic ritings,are the =esser -ippias, the Menexenus or )uneral :ration, the )irst

    >lcibia"es& :f these, the =esser -ippias an" the )uneral :ration are cite"by >ristotle the first in the Metaphysics, the latter in the +hetoric&;either of the% are expressly attribute" to Plato, but in his citation ofboth of the% he see%s to be referring to passages in the extant "ialogues&)ro% the %ention of N-ippiasN in the singular by >ristotle, e %ay perhapsinfer that he as unacuainte" ith a secon" "ialogue bearing the sa%ena%e& Moreo!er, the %ere existence of a Greater an" =esser -ippias, an" ofa )irst an" .econ" >lcibia"es, "oes to a certain extent thro a "oubt upon

    both of the%& Though a !ery cle!er an" ingenious or, the =esser -ippias"oes not appear to contain anything beyon" the poer of an i%itator, hoas also a careful stu"ent of the earlier Platonic ritings, to in!ent&The %oti!e or lea"ing thought of the "ialogue %ay be "etecte" in Ren&Me%&,an" there is no si%ilar instance of a N%oti!eN hich is taen fro% Renophonin an un"oubte" "ialogue of Plato& :n the other han", the uphol"ers of thegenuineness of the "ialogue ill fin" in the -ippias a true .ocraticspirit they ill co%pare the on as being ain both in subject an"treat%ent they ill urge the authority of >ristotle an" they ill "etectin the treat%ent of the .ophist, in the satirical reasoning upon -o%er, in

    the re"uctio a" absur"u% of the "octrine that !ice is ignorance, traces ofa Platonic authorship& n reference to the last point e are "oubtful, asin so%e of the other "ialogues, hether the author is asserting oro!erthroing the para"ox of .ocrates, or %erely folloing the argu%entNhither the in" blos&N That no conclusion is arri!e" at is also inaccor"ance ith the character of the earlier "ialogues& The rese%blancesor i%itations of the Gorgias, Protagoras, an" Euthy"e%us, hich ha!e been

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    12/32

    obser!e" in the -ippias, cannot ith certainty be a""uce" on either si"e ofthe argu%ent& :n the hole, %ore %ay be sai" in fa!our of the genuinenessof the -ippias than against it&

    The Menexenus or )uneral :ration is cite" by >ristotle, an" is interestingas supplying an exa%ple of the %anner in hich the orators praise" Nthe>thenians a%ong the >thenians,N falsifying persons an" "ates, an" casting a!eil o!er the gloo%ier e!ents of >thenian history& t exhibits anacuaintance ith the funeral oration of Thucy"i"es, an" as, perhaps,inten"e" to ri!al that great or& f genuine, the proper place of theMenexenus oul" be at the en" of the Phae"rus& The satirical opening an"the conclu"ing or"s bear a great rese%blance to the earlier "ialogues theoration itself is professe"ly a %i%etic or, lie the speeches in thePhae"rus, an" cannot therefore be teste" by a co%parison of the other

    ritings of Plato& The funeral oration of Pericles is expressly %entione"in the Phae"rus, an" this %ay ha!e suggeste" the subject, in the sa%e%anner that the Cleitophon appears to be suggeste" by the slight %ention ofCleitophon an" his attach%ent to Thrasy%achus in the +epublic an" theTheages by the %ention of Theages in the >pology an" +epublic or as the.econ" >lcibia"es see%s to be foun"e" upon the text of Renophon, Me%&>si%ilar taste for paro"y appears not only in the Phae"rus, but in theProtagoras, in the .y%posiu%, an" to a certain extent in the Par%eni"es&

    To these to "oubtful ritings of Plato ha!e a""e" the )irst >lcibia"es,hich, of all the "ispute" "ialogues of Plato, has the greatest %erit, an"is so%ehat longer than any of the%, though not !erifie" by the testi%onyof >ristotle, an" in %any respects at !ariance ith the .y%posiu% in the"escription of the relations of .ocrates an" >lcibia"es& =ie the =esser-ippias an" the Menexenus, it is to be co%pare" to the earlier ritings ofPlato& The %oti!e of the piece %ay, perhaps, be foun" in that passage ofthe .y%posiu% in hich >lcibia"es "escribes hi%self as selfFcon!icte" bythe or"s of .ocrates& )or the "isparaging %anner in hich .chleier%acher

    has spoen of this "ialogue there see%s to be no sufficient foun"ation& >tthe sa%e ti%e, the lesson i%parte" is si%ple, an" the irony %oretransparent than in the un"oubte" "ialogues of Plato& 'e no, too, that>lcibia"es as a fa!ourite thesis, an" that at least fi!e or six "ialogues

    bearing this na%e passe" current in antiuity, an" are attribute" toconte%poraries of .ocrates an" Plato& /D n the entire absence of realexternal e!i"ence for the catalogues of the >lexan"rian librarians cannot

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    13/32

    be regar"e" as trustorthyD an" 2D in the absence of the highest %arseither of poetical or philosophical excellence an" 3D consi"ering that eha!e express testi%ony to the existence of conte%porary ritings bearingthe na%e of >lcibia"es, e are co%pelle" to suspen" our ju"g%ent on thegenuineness of the extant "ialogue&

    ;either at this point, nor at any other, "o e propose to "ra an absoluteline of "e%arcation beteen genuine an" spurious ritings of Plato& Theyfa"e off i%perceptibly fro% one class to another& There %ay ha!e been"egrees of genuineness in the "ialogues the%sel!es, as there are certainly"egrees of e!i"ence by hich they are supporte"& The tra"itions of theoral "iscourses both of .ocrates an" Plato %ay ha!e for%e" the basis ofse%iFPlatonic ritings so%e of the% %ay be of the sa%e %ixe" characterhich is apparent in >ristotle an" -ippocrates, although the for% of the%

    is "ifferent& ut the ritings of Plato, unlie the ritings of >ristotle,see% ne!er to ha!e been confuse" ith the ritings of his "isciplesB thisas probably "ue to their "efinite for%, an" to their ini%itableexcellence& The three "ialogues hich e ha!e offere" in the >ppen"ix tothe criticis% of the rea"er %ay be partly spurious an" partly genuine they%ay be altogether spuriousFFthat is an alternati!e hich %ust be franlya"%itte"& ;or can e %aintain of so%e other "ialogues, such as thePar%eni"es, an" the .ophist, an" Politicus, that no consi"erable objectioncan be urge" against the%, though greatly o!erbalance" by the eightchieflyD of internal e!i"ence in their fa!our& ;or, on the other han",can e exclu"e a bare possibility that so%e "ialogues hich are usuallyrejecte", such as the Greater -ippias an" the Cleitophon, %ay be genuine&The nature an" object of these se%iFPlatonic ritings reuire %ore carefulstu"y an" %ore co%parison of the% ith one another, an" ith forge"ritings in general, than they ha!e yet recei!e", before e can finally"eci"e on their character& 'e "o not consi"er the% all as genuine untilthey can be pro!e" to be spurious, as is often %aintaine" an" still %oreoften i%plie" in this an" si%ilar "iscussions but shoul" say of so%e ofthe%, that their genuineness is neither pro!en nor "ispro!en until further

    e!i"ence about the% can be a""uce"& >n" e are as confi"ent that theEpistles are spurious, as that the +epublic, the Ti%aeus, an" the =as aregenuine&

    :n the hole, not a tentieth part of the ritings hich pass un"er thena%e of Plato, if e exclu"e the ors rejecte" by the ancients the%sel!esan" to or three other plausible in!entions, can be fairly "oubte" by those

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    14/32

    ho are illing to allo that a consi"erable change an" groth %ay ha!etaen place in his philosophy see abo!eD& That tentieth "ebatable

    portion scarcely in any "egree affects our ju"g%ent of Plato, either as athiner or a riter, an" though suggesting so%e interesting uestions tothe scholar an" critic, is of little i%portance to the general rea"er&

    ME;ERE;ppen"ix abo!eD

    Translate" by enja%in oett

    ;T+:(ntalci"as, an e!ent occurring fortyyears after the "ate of the suppose" oration& ut Plato, lie .haespeare,is careless of such anachronis%s, hich are not suppose" to strie the %in"of the rea"er& The effect pro"uce" by these gran"ilouent orations on.ocrates, ho "oes not reco!er after ha!ing hear" one of the% for three"ays an" %ore, is truly Platonic&

    .uch "iscourses, if e %ay for% a ju"g%ent fro% the three hich are extantfor the soFcalle" )uneral :ration of (e%osthenes is a ba" an" spuriousi%itation of Thucy"i"es an" =ysiasD, confor%e" to a regular type& They

    began ith Go"s an" ancestors, an" the legen"ary history of >thens, tohich succee"e" an al%ost eually fictitious account of later ti%es& ThePersian ar usually for%e" the centre of the narrati!e in the age of

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    15/32

    socrates an" (e%osthenes the >thenians ere still li!ing on the glories ofMarathon an" .ala%is& The Menexenus !eils in panegyric the ea placesof>thenian history& The ar of >thens an" oeotia is a ar of liberationthe >thenians ga!e bac the .partans taen at .phacteria out of in"nessFFin"ee", the only fault of the city as too great in"ness to their ene%ies,ho ere %ore honoure" than the frien"s of others co%pare Thucy"&,hichsee%s to contain the ger% of the i"eaD e "e%ocrats are the aristocracy of!irtue, an" the lie& These are the platitu"es an" falsehoo"s in hichhistory is "isguise"& The taing of >thens is har"ly %entione"&

    The author of the Menexenus, hether Plato or not, is e!i"ently inten"ingto ri"icule the practice, an" at the sa%e ti%e to sho that he can beat the

    rhetoricians in their on line, as in the Phae"rus he %ay be suppose" tooffer an exa%ple of hat =ysias %ight ha!e sai", an" of ho %uch better he%ight ha!e ritten in his on style& The orators ha" recourse to theirfa!ourite loci co%%unes, one of hich, as e fin" in =ysias, as theshortness of the ti%e alloe" the% for preparation& ut .ocrates pointsout that they ha" the% alays rea"y for "eli!ery, an" that there as no"ifficulty in i%pro!ising any nu%ber of such orations& To praise the>thenians a%ong the >thenians as easy,FFto praise the% a%ong the=ace"ae%onians oul" ha!e been a %uch %ore "ifficult tas& .ocrateshi%self has turne" rhetorician, ha!ing learne" of a o%an, >spasia, the%istress of Pericles an" any one hose teachers ha" been far inferior tohis onFFsay, one ho ha" learne" fro% >ntiphon the +ha%nusianFFoul"

    beuite eual to the tas of praising %en to the%sel!es& 'hen e re%e%berthat >ntiphon is "escribe" by Thucy"i"es as the best plea"er of his "ay,the satire on hi% an" on the hole tribe of rhetoricians is transparent&

    The ironical assu%ption of .ocrates, that he %ust be a goo" orator becausehe ha" learnt of >spasia, is not coarse, as .chleier%acher supposes, but is

    rather to be regar"e" as fanciful& ;or can e say that the offer of.ocrates to "ance nae" out of lo!e for Menexenus, is any %ore unFPlatonicthan the threat of physical force hich Phae"rus uses toar"s .ocrates&

    ;or is there any real !ulgarity in the fear hich .ocrates expresses thathe ill get a beating fro% his %istress, >spasiaB this is the naturalexaggeration of hat %ight be expecte" fro% an i%perious o%an&.ocrates

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    16/32

    is not to be taen seriously in all that he says, an" Plato, both in the.y%posiu% an" elsehere, is not slo to a"%it a sort of >ristophanichu%our& -o a great original genius lie Plato %ight or %ight not ha!eritten, hat as his conception of hu%our, or hat li%its he oul" ha!e

    prescribe" to hi%self, if any, in "raing the picture of the .ilenus.ocrates, are proble%s hich no critical instinct can "eter%ine&

    :n the other han", the "ialogue has se!eral Platonic traits, hetheroriginal or i%itate" %ay be uncertain& .ocrates, hen he "eparts fro% hischaracter of a Nno nothingN an" "eli!ers a speech, generally preten"sthat hat he is speaing is not his on co%position& Thus in the Cratylushe is run aay ith in the Phae"rus he has hear" so%ebo"y say so%ethingFFis inspire" by the genius loci in the .y%posiu% he "eri!es his is"o% fro%(ioti%a of Mantinea, an" the lie& ut he "oes not i%pose on Menexenus

    byhis "issi%ulation& 'ithout !iolating the character of .ocrates, Plato, honos so ell ho to gi!e a hint, or so%e one riting in his na%e,inti%ates clearly enough that the speech in the Menexenus lie that in thePhae"rus is to be attribute" to .ocrates& The a""ress of the "ea" to theli!ing at the en" of the oration %ay also be co%pare" to the nu%erousa""resses of the sa%e in" hich occur in Plato, in ho% the "ra%aticele%ent is alays ten"ing to pre!ail o!er the rhetorical& The re%ar has

    been often %a"e, that in the )uneral :ration of Thucy"i"es there is noallusion to the existence of the "ea"& ut in the Menexenus a future stateis clearly, although not strongly, asserte"&

    'hether the Menexenus is a genuine riting of Plato, or an i%itation only,re%ains uncertain& n either case, the thoughts are partly borroe" fro%the )uneral :ration of Thucy"i"es an" the fact that they are so, is not infa!our of the genuineness of the or& nternal e!i"ence see%s to lea!ethe uestion of authorship in "oubt& There are %erits an" there are"efects hich %ight lea" to either conclusion& The for% of the greater

    part of the or %aes the enuiry "ifficult the intro"uction an" the

    finale certainly ear the loo either of Plato or of an extre%ely silfuli%itator& The excellence of the forgery %ay be fairly a""uce" as anargu%ent that it is not a forgery at all& n this uncertainty the expresstesti%ony of >ristotle, ho uotes, in the +hetoric, the ellFnon or"s,Nt is easy to praise the >thenians a%ong the >thenians,N fro% the )uneral:ration, %ay perhaps turn the balance in its fa!our& t %ust be re%e%bere"also that the or as fa%ous in antiuity, an" is inclu"e" in the

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    17/32

    >lexan"rian catalogues of Platonic ritings&

    ME;ERE;ppen"ix abo!eD

    Translate" by enja%in oett

    PE+.:;. :) T-E (>=:GTE.B : Menexenus$ (eath in battle is certainly in %any respects anoble thing& The "ea" %an gets a fine an" costly funeral, although he %ay

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    18/32

    ha!e been poor, an" an elaborate speech is %a"e o!er hi% by a ise %anhohas long ago prepare" hat he has to say, although he ho is praise" %aynot ha!e been goo" for %uch& The speaers praise hi% for hat he has "onean" for hat he has not "oneFFthat is the beauty of the%FFan" they stealaay our souls ith their e%bellishe" or"s in e!ery concei!able for%they

    praise the city an" they praise those ho "ie" in ar, an" all ourancestors ho ent before us an" they praise oursel!es also ho are stillali!e, until feel uite ele!ate" by their lau"ations, an" stan"listening to their or"s, Menexenus, an" beco%e enchante" by the%, an" allin a %o%ent i%agine %yself to ha!e beco%e a greater an" nobler an" finer%an than as before& >n" if, as often happens, there are any foreignersho acco%pany %e to the speech, beco%e su""enly conscious of ha!ing a

    sort of triu%ph o!er the%, an" they see% to experience a correspon"ingfeeling of a"%iration at %e, an" at the greatness of the city, hichappears to the%, hen they are un"er the influence of the speaer, %oreon"erful than e!er& This consciousness of "ignity lasts %e %ore thanthree "ays, an" not until the fourth or fifth "ay "o co%e to %y sensesan" no here a% in the %eanti%e ha!e been li!ing in the slan"s ofthe lest& .uch is the art of our rhetoricians, an" in such %anner "oesthe soun" of their or"s eep ringing in %y ears&

    ME;ERE;TE.B ut hy, %y frien", shoul" he not ha!e plenty to sayS E!eryrhetorician has speeches rea"y %a"e nor is there any "ifficulty ini%pro!ising that sort of stuff& -a" the orator to praise >thenians a%ongPeloponnesians, or Peloponnesians a%ong >thenians, he %ust be a goo"

    rhetorician ho coul" succee" an" gain cre"it& ut there is no "ifficultyin a %anNs inning applause hen he is conten"ing for fa%e a%ong the

    persons ho% he is praising&

    ME;ERE;TE.B Certainly Nnot&N

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    19/32

    ME;ERE;spasia&

    .:C+>TE.B Qes, "o an" besi"es her ha" Connus, the son ofMetrobius,as a %aster, an" he as %y %aster in %usic, as she as in rhetoric& ;oon"er that a %an ho has recei!e" such an e"ucation shoul" be a finishe"speaer e!en the pupil of !ery inferior %asters, say, for exa%ple, one hoha" learne" %usic of =a%prus, an" rhetoric of >ntiphon the +ha%nusian,%ight %ae a figure if he ere to praise the >thenians a%ong the >thenians&

    ME;ERE;n" hat oul" you be able to say if you ha" to speaS

    .:C+>TE.B :f %y on it, %ost liely nothing but yester"ay hear">spasia co%posing a funeral oration about these !ery "ea"& )or she ha"

    been tol", as you ere saying, that the >thenians ere going to choose aspeaer, an" she repeate" to %e the sort of speech hich he shoul" "eli!er,

    partly i%pro!ising an" partly fro% pre!ious thought, putting togetherfrag%ents of the funeral oration hich Pericles spoe, but hich, as

    belie!e, she co%pose"&

    ME;ERE;n" can you re%e%ber hat >spasia sai"S

    .:C+>TE.B ought to be able, for she taught %e, an" she as rea"y tostrie %e because as alays forgetting&

    ME;ERE;

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    20/32

    .:C+>TE.B ecause a% afrai" that %y %istress %ay be angry ith %e if

    publish her speech&

    ME;ERE;spasiaNs oranyone elseNs, no %atter& hope that you ill oblige %e&

    .:C+>TE.B ut a% afrai" that you ill laugh at %e if continue thega%es of youth in ol" age&

    ME;ERE;TE.B Truly ha!e such a "isposition to oblige you, that if you bi"%e "ance nae" shoul" not lie to refuse, since e are alone& =istenthenB f re%e%ber rightly, she began as follos, ith the %ention of the"ea"BFF Thucy"&D

    There is a tribute of "ee"s an" of or"s& The "eparte" ha!e alrea"y ha"the first, hen going forth on their "estine" journey they ere atten"e" ontheir ay by the state an" by their frien"s the tribute of or"s re%ainsto be gi!en to the%, as is %eet an" by la or"aine"& )or noble or"s are a%e%orial an" a cron of noble actions, hich are gi!en to the "oers of the%

    by the hearers& > or" is nee"e" hich ill "uly praise the "ea" an"gently a"%onish the li!ing, exhorting the brethren an" "escen"ants of the"eparte" to i%itate their !irtue, an" consoling their fathers an" %othersan" the sur!i!ors, if any, ho %ay chance to be ali!e of the pre!iousgeneration& 'hat sort of a or" ill this be, an" ho shall e rightly

    begin the praises of these bra!e %enS n their life they rejoice" theiron frien"s ith their !alour, an" their "eath they ga!e in exchange forthe sal!ation of the li!ing& >n" thin that e shoul" praise the% in theor"er in hich nature %a"e the% goo", for they ere goo" because they

    eresprung fro% goo" fathers& 'herefore let us first of all praise thegoo"ness of their birth secon"ly, their nurture an" e"ucation an" thenlet us set forth ho noble their actions ere, an" ho orthy of thee"ucation hich they ha" recei!e"&

    >n" first as to their birth& Their ancestors ere not strangers, nor are

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    21/32

    these their "escen"ants sojourners only, hose fathers ha!e co%e fro%another country but they are the chil"ren of the soil, "elling an" li!ingin their on lan"& >n" the country hich brought the% up is not lie othercountries, a step%other to her chil"ren, but their on true %other she

    bore the% an" nourishe" the% an" recei!e" the%, an" in her boso% theynorepose& t is %eet an" right, therefore, that e shoul" begin by praisingthe lan" hich is their %other, an" that ill be a ay of praising theirnoble birth&

    The country is orthy to be praise", not only by us, but by all %anin"first, an" abo!e all, as being "ear to the Go"s& This is pro!e" by thestrife an" contention of the Go"s respecting her& >n" ought not thecountry hich the Go"s praise to be praise" by all %anin"S The secon"

    praise hich %ay be fairly clai%e" by her, is that at the ti%e hen thehole earth as sen"ing forth an" creating "i!erse ani%als, ta%e an" il",she our %other as free an" pure fro% sa!age %onsters, an" out of allani%als selecte" an" brought forth %an, ho is superior to the rest inun"erstan"ing, an" alone has justice an" religion& >n" a great proof thatshe brought forth the co%%on ancestors of us an" of the "eparte", is thatshe pro!i"e" the %eans of support for her offspring& )or as a o%an pro!esher %otherhoo" by gi!ing %il to her young ones an" she ho has nofountain of %il is not a %otherD, so "i" this our lan" pro!e that she asthe %other of %en, for in those "ays she alone an" first of all broughtforth heat an" barley for hu%an foo", hich is the best an" noblestsustenance for %an, ho% she regar"e" as her true offspring& >n" these aretruer proofs of %otherhoo" in a country than in a o%an, for the o%an inher conception an" generation is but the i%itation of the earth, an" notthe earth of the o%an& >n" of the fruit of the earth she ga!e a plenteoussupply, not only to her on, but to others also an" afterar"s she %a"ethe oli!e to spring up to be a boon to her chil"ren, an" to help the% intheir toils& >n" hen she ha" herself nurse" the% an" brought the% up to%anhoo", she ga!e the% Go"s to be their rulers an" teachers, hose na%es

    are ell non, an" nee" not no be repeate"& They are the Go"s ho firstor"ere" our li!es, an" instructe" us in the arts for the supply of our"aily nee"s, an" taught us the acuisition an" use of ar%s for the "efenceof the country&

    Thus born into the orl" an" thus e"ucate", the ancestors of the "eparte"li!e" an" %a"e the%sel!es a go!ern%ent, hich ought briefly to

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    22/32

    co%%e%orate& )or go!ern%ent is the nurture of %an, an" the go!ern%entofgoo" %en is goo", an" of ba" %en ba"& >n" %ust sho that our ancestorsere traine" un"er a goo" go!ern%ent, an" for this reason they ere goo",an" our conte%poraries are also goo", a%ong ho% our "eparte" frien"s areto be recone"& Then as no, an" in"ee" alays, fro% that ti%e to this,speaing generally, our go!ern%ent as an aristocracyFFa for% ofgo!ern%enthich recei!es !arious na%es, accor"ing to the fancies of %en, an" isso%eti%es calle" "e%ocracy, but is really an aristocracy or go!ern%ent ofthe best hich has the appro!al of the %any& )or ings e ha!e alays ha",first here"itary an" then electe", an" authority is %ostly in the han"s ofthe people, ho "ispense offices an" poer to those ho appear to be %ost"eser!ing of the%& ;either is a %an rejecte" fro% eaness or po!erty or

    obscurity of origin, nor honoure" by reason of the opposite, as in otherstates, but there is one principleFFhe ho appears to be ise an" goo" is ago!ernor an" ruler& The basis of this our go!ern%ent is euality of birthfor other states are %a"e up of all sorts an" uneual con"itions of %en,an" therefore their go!ern%ents are uneual there are tyrannies an" thereare oligarchies, in hich the one party are sla!es an" the others %asters&ut e an" our citi9ens are brethren, the chil"ren all of one %other, an"e "o not thin it right to be one anotherNs %asters or ser!ants but thenatural euality of birth co%pels us to see for legal euality, an" torecogni9e no superiority except in the reputation of !irtue an" is"o%&

    >n" so their an" our fathers, an" these, too, our brethren, being noblyborn an" ha!ing been brought up in all free"o%, "i" both in their publican" pri!ate capacity %any noble "ee"s fa%ous o!er the hole orl"& Theyere the "ee"s of %en ho thought that they ought to fight both against-ellenes for the sae of -ellenes on behalf of free"o%, an" against

    barbarians in the co%%on interest of -ellas& Ti%e oul" fail %e to tell oftheir "efence of their country against the in!asion of Eu%olpus an" the>%a9ons, or of their "efence of the >rgi!es against the Ca"%eians, or of

    the -eraclei"s against the >rgi!es besi"es, the poets ha!e alrea"y"eclare" in song to all %anin" their glory, an" therefore anyco%%e%oration of their "ee"s in prose hich e %ight atte%pt oul" hol"asecon" place& They alrea"y ha!e their rear", an" say no %ore of the%

    but there are other orthy "ee"s of hich no poet has orthily sung, an"hich are still ooing the poetNs %use& :f these a% boun" to %ae

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    23/32

    honourable %ention, an" shall in!oe others to sing of the% also in lyrican" other strains, in a %anner beco%ing the actors& >n" first ill tellho the Persians, lor"s of >sia, ere ensla!ing Europe, an" ho thechil"ren of this lan", ho ere our fathers, hel" the% bac& :f these ill spea first, an" praise their !alour, as is %eet an" fitting& -e hooul" rightly esti%ate the% shoul" place hi%self in thought at that ti%e,hen the hole of >sia as subject to the thir" ing of Persia& The firsting, Cyrus, by his !alour free" the Persians, ho ere his country%en, an"subjecte" the Me"es, ho ere their lor"s, an" he rule" o!er the rest of>sia, as far as Egypt an" after hi% ca%e his son, ho rule" all theaccessible part of Egypt an" =ibya the thir" ing as (arius, ho exten"e"the lan" boun"aries of the e%pire to .cythia, an" ith his fleet hel" thesea an" the islan"s& ;one presu%e" to be his eual the %in"s of all %enere enthralle" by hi%FFso %any an" %ighty an" arlie nations ha" the

    poer of Persia sub"ue"& ;o (arius ha" a uarrel against us an" theEretrians, because, as he sai", e ha" conspire" against .ar"is, an" hesent L88,888 %en in transports an" !essels of ar, an" 388 ships, an" (atisas co%%an"er, telling hi% to bring the Eretrians an" >thenians to the ing,if he ishe" to eep his hea" on his shoul"ers& -e saile" against theEretrians, ho ere repute" to be a%ongst the noblest an" %ost arlie ofthe -ellenes of that "ay, an" they ere nu%erous, but he conuere" the% allin three "ays an" hen he ha" conuere" the%, in or"er that no one %ightescape, he searche" the hole country after this %annerB his sol"iers,co%ing to the bor"ers of Eretria an" sprea"ing fro% sea to sea, joine"han"s an" passe" through the hole country, in or"er that they %ight beable to tell the ing that no one ha" escape" the%& >n" fro% Eretria theyent to Marathon ith a lie intention, expecting to bin" the >thenians inthe sa%e yoe of necessity in hich they ha" boun" the Eretrians& -a!ingeffecte" oneFhalf of their purpose, they ere in the act of atte%pting theother, an" none of the -ellenes "are" to assist either the Eretrians or the>thenians, except the =ace"ae%onians, an" they arri!e" a "ay too late forthe battle but the rest ere panicFstricen an" ept uiet, too happy inha!ing escape" for a ti%e& -e ho has present to his %in" that conflict

    ill no hat %anner of %en they ere ho recei!e" the onset of thebarbarians at Marathon, an" chastene" the pri"e of the hole of >sia, an"by the !ictory hich they gaine" o!er the barbarians first taught other %enthat the poer of the Persians as not in!incible, but that hosts of %enan" the %ultitu"e of riches alie yiel" to !alour& >n" assert that those%en are the fathers not only of oursel!es, but of our liberties an" of theliberties of all ho are on the continent, for that as the action to hich

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    24/32

    the -ellenes looe" bac hen they !enture" to fight for their on safetyin the battles hich ensue"B they beca%e "isciples of the %en of Marathon&To the%, therefore, assign in %y speech the first place, an" the secon"to those ho fought an" conuere" in the sea fights at .ala%is an">rte%isiu% for of the%, too, one %ight ha!e %any things to sayFFof theassaults hich they en"ure" by sea an" lan", an" ho they repelle" the%& ill %ention only that act of theirs hich appears to %e to be the noblest,an" hich folloe" that of Marathon an" ca%e nearest to it for the %en ofMarathon only shoe" the -ellenes that it as possible to ar" off the

    barbarians by lan", the %any by the fe but there as no proof that theycoul" be "efeate" by ships, an" at sea the Persians retaine" the reputationof being in!incible in nu%bers an" ealth an" sill an" strength& This isthe glory of the %en ho fought at sea, that they "ispelle" the secon"terror hich ha" hitherto possesse" the -ellenes, an" so %a"e the fear of

    nu%bers, hether of ships or %en, to cease a%ong the%& >n" so thesol"iersof Marathon an" the sailors of .ala%is beca%e the school%asters of -ellasthe one teaching an" habituating the -ellenes not to fear the barbarians atsea, an" the others not to fear the% by lan"& Thir" in or"er, for thenu%ber an" !alour of the co%batants, an" thir" in the sal!ation of -ellas, place the battle of Plataea& >n" no the =ace"ae%onians as ell as the>thenians too part in the struggle they ere all unite" in this greatestan" %ost terrible conflict of all herefore their !irtues ill becelebrate" in ti%es to co%e, as they are no celebrate" by us& ut at alater perio" %any -ellenic tribes ere still on the si"e of the barbarians,an" there as a report that the great ing as going to %ae a ne atte%ptupon the -ellenes, an" therefore justice reuires that e shoul" also %ae%ention of those ho crone" the pre!ious or of our sal!ation, an" "ro!ean" purge" aay all barbarians fro% the sea& These ere the %en hofought

    by sea at the ri!er Eury%e"on, an" ho ent on the expe"ition to Cyprus,an" ho saile" to Egypt an" "i!ers other places an" they shoul" begratefully re%e%bere" by us, because they co%pelle" the ing in fear for

    hi%self to loo to his on safety instea" of plotting the "estruction of-ellas&

    >n" so the ar against the barbarians as fought out to the en" by thehole city on their on behalf, an" on behalf of their country%en& Thereas peace, an" our city as hel" in honour an" then, as prosperity %aes%en jealous, there succee"e" a jealousy of her, an" jealousy begat en!y,

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    25/32

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    26/32

    entere" into negotiations ith their bitterest ene%y, the ing of Persia,ho% they, together ith us, ha" expelle"FFhi%, ithout us, they again

    brought bac, barbarian against -ellenes, an" all the hosts, both of-ellenes an" barbarians, ere unite" against >thens& >n" then shone forththe poer an" !alour of our city& -er ene%ies ha" suppose" that she asexhauste" by the ar, an" our ships ere bloca"e" at Mitylene& ut theciti9ens the%sel!es e%bare", an" ca%e to the rescue ith sixty otherships, an" their !alour as confesse" of all %en, for they conuere" theirene%ies an" "eli!ere" their frien"s& >n" yet by so%e e!il fortune theyere left to perish at sea, an" therefore are not interre" here& E!er to

    be re%e%bere" an" honoure" are they, for by their !alour not only that seaFfight as on for us, but the entire ar as "eci"e" by the%, an" throughthe% the city gaine" the reputation of being in!incible, e!en thoughattace" by all %anin"& >n" that reputation as a true one, for the

    "efeat hich ca%e upon us as our on "oing& 'e ere ne!er conuere"byothers, an" to this "ay e are still unconuere" by the% but e ere ouron conuerors, an" recei!e" "efeat at our on han"s& >fterar"s thereasuiet an" peace abroa", but there sprang up ar at ho%e an", if %en are"estine" to ha!e ci!il ar, no one coul" ha!e "esire" that his city shoul"tae the "isor"er in a %il"er for%& -o joyful an" natural as thereconciliation of those ho ca%e fro% the Piraeus an" those ho ca%e fro%the city ith hat %o"eration "i" they or"er the ar against the tyrantsin Eleusis, an" in a %anner ho unlie hat the other -ellenes expecte"$>n" the reason of this gentleness as the !eritable tie of bloo", hichcreate" a%ong the% a frien"ship as of ins%en, faithful not in or" only,

    but in "ee"& >n" e ought also to re%e%ber those ho then fell by oneanotherNs han"s, an" on such occasions as these to reconcile the% ithsacrifices an" prayers, praying to those ho ha!e poer o!er the%, thatthey %ay be reconcile" e!en as e are reconcile"& )or they "i" not attacone another out of %alice or en%ity, but they ere unfortunate& >n" thatsuch as the fact e oursel!es are itnesses, ho are of the sa%e race ith

    the%, an" ha!e %utually recei!e" an" grante" forgi!eness of hat e ha!e"one an" suffere"& >fter this there as perfect peace, an" the city ha"rest an" her feeling as that she forga!e the barbarians, ho ha" se!erelysuffere" at her han"s an" se!erely retaliate", but that she as in"ignantat the ingratitu"e of the -ellenes, hen she re%e%bere" ho they ha"recei!e" goo" fro% her an" returne" e!il, ha!ing %a"e co%%on cause iththe

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    27/32

    barbarians, "epri!ing her of the ships hich ha" once been their sal!ation,an" "is%antling our alls, hich ha" preser!e" their on fro% falling& .hethought that she oul" no longer "efen" the -ellenes, hen ensla!e" either

    by one another or by the barbarians, an" "i" accor"ingly& This as ourfeeling, hile the =ace"ae%onians ere thining that e ho ere thecha%pions of liberty ha" fallen, an" that their business as to subject there%aining -ellenes& >n" hy shoul" say %oreS for the e!ents of hich a% speaing happene" not long ago an" e can all of us re%e%ber ho thechief peoples of -ellas, >rgi!es an" oeotians an" Corinthians, ca%e tofeel the nee" of us, an", hat is the greatest %iracle of all, the Persianing hi%self as "ri!en to such extre%ity as to co%e roun" to the opinion,that fro% this city, of hich he as the "estroyer, an" fro% no other, hissal!ation oul" procee"&

    >n" if a person "esire" to bring a "eser!e" accusation against our city, heoul" fin" only one charge hich he coul" justly urgeFFthat she as tooco%passionate an" too fa!ourable to the eaer si"e& >n" in this instanceshe as not able to hol" out or eep her resolution of refusing ai" to herinjurers hen they ere being ensla!e", but she as softene", an" "i" infact sen" out ai", an" "eli!ere" the -ellenes fro% sla!ery, an" they erefree until they afterar"s ensla!e" the%sel!es& 'hereas, to the great ingshe refuse" to gi!e the assistance of the state, for she coul" not forgetthe trophies of Marathon an" .ala%is an" Plataea but she alloe" exilesan" !olunteers to assist hi%, an" they ere his sal!ation& >n" sheherself, hen she as co%pelle", entere" into the ar, an" built alls an"ships, an" fought ith the =ace"ae%onians on behalf of the Parians& ;othe ing fearing this city an" anting to stan" aloof, hen he sa the=ace"ae%onians groing eary of the ar at sea, ase" of us, as the priceof his alliance ith us an" the other allies, to gi!e up the -ellenes in>sia, ho% the =ace"ae%onians ha" pre!iously han"e" o!er to hi%, hethining that e shoul" refuse, an" that then he %ight ha!e a pretence forith"raing fro% us& >bout the other allies he as %istaen, for theCorinthians an" >rgi!es an" oeotians, an" the other states, ere uite

    illing to let the% go, an" sore an" co!enante", that, if he oul" paythe% %oney, they oul" %ae o!er to hi% the -ellenes of the continent,an"e alone refuse" to gi!e the% up an" sear& .uch as the natural nobilityof this city, so soun" an" healthy as the spirit of free"o% a%ong us, an"the instincti!e "islie of the barbarian, because e are pure -ellenes,ha!ing no a"%ixture of barbaris% in us& )or e are not lie %any others,

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    28/32

    "escen"ants of Pelops or Ca"%us or Egyptus or (anaus, ho are by naturebarbarians, an" yet pass for -ellenes, an" "ell in the %i"st of us but eare pure -ellenes, unconta%inate" by any foreign ele%ent, an" therefore thehatre" of the foreigner has passe" una"ulterate" into the lifeFbloo" of thecity& >n" so, notithstan"ing our noble senti%ents, e ere againisolate", because e ere unilling to be guilty of the base an" unholy actof gi!ing up -ellenes to barbarians& >n" e ere in the sa%e case as hene ere sub"ue" before but, by the fa!our of -ea!en, e %anage" better,for e en"e" the ar ithout the loss of our ships or alls or coloniesthe ene%y as only too gla" to be uit of us& Qet in this ar e lost %any

    bra!e %en, such as ere those ho fell oing to the rugge"ness of thegroun" at the battle of Corinth, or by treason at =echaeu%& ra!e %en,too, ere those ho "eli!ere" the Persian ing, an" "ro!e the=ace"ae%onians fro% the sea& re%in" you of the%, an" you %ust

    celebratethe% together ith %e, an" "o honour to their %e%ories&

    .uch ere the actions of the %en ho are here interre", an" of others hoha!e "ie" on behalf of their country %any an" glorious things ha!espoen of the%, an" there are yet %any %ore an" %ore glorious thingsre%aining to be tol"FF%any "ays an" nights oul" not suffice to tell ofthe%& =et the% not be forgotten, an" let e!ery %an re%in" their"escen"ants that they also are sol"iers ho %ust not "esert the rans oftheir ancestors, or fro% coar"ice fall behin"& E!en as exhort you this"ay, an" in all future ti%e, hene!er %eet ith any of you, shallcontinue to re%in" an" exhort you, : ye sons of heroes, that you stri!e to

    be the bra!est of %en& >n" thin that ought no to repeat hat yourfathers "esire" to ha!e sai" to you ho are their sur!i!ors, hen they entout to battle, in case anything happene" to the%& ill tell you hat hear" the% say, an" hat, if they ha" only speech, they oul" fain besaying, ju"ging fro% hat they then sai"& >n" you %ust i%agine that youhear the% saying hat no repeat to youBFF

    N.ons, the e!ent pro!es that your fathers ere bra!e %en for e %ight ha!eli!e" "ishonourably, but ha!e preferre" to "ie honourably rather than bringyou an" your chil"ren into "isgrace, an" rather than "ishonour our onfathers an" forefathers consi"ering that life is not life to one ho is a"ishonour to his race, an" that to such a one neither %en nor Go"s arefrien"ly, either hile he is on the earth or after "eath in the orl"

    belo& +e%e%ber our or"s, then, an" hate!er is your ai% let !irtue be

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    29/32

    the con"ition of the attain%ent of your ai%, an" no that ithout this allpossessions an" pursuits are "ishonourable an" e!il& )or neither "oesealth bring honour to the oner, if he be a coar" of such a one theealth belongs to another, an" not to hi%self& ;or "oes beauty an"strength of bo"y, hen "elling in a base an" coar"ly %an, appearco%ely,

    but the re!erse of co%ely, %aing the possessor %ore conspicuous, an"%anifesting forth his coar"ice& >n" all nole"ge, hen separate" fro%

    justice an" !irtue, is seen to be cunning an" not is"o% herefore %aethis your first an" last an" constant an" allFabsorbing ai%, to excee", if

    possible, not only us but all your ancestors in !irtue an" no that toexcel you in !irtue only brings us sha%e, but that to be excelle" by you isa source of happiness to us& >n" e shall %ost liely be "efeate", an" youill %ost liely be !ictors in the contest, if you learn so to or"er your

    li!es as not to abuse or aste the reputation of your ancestors, noingthat to a %an ho has any selfFrespect, nothing is %ore "ishonourable thanto be honoure", not for his on sae, but on account of the reputation ofhis ancestors& The honour of parents is a fair an" noble treasure to their

    posterity, but to ha!e the use of a treasure of ealth an" honour, an" tolea!e none to your successors, because you ha!e neither %oney norreputation of your on, is alie base an" "ishonourable& >n" if you folloour precepts you ill be recei!e" by us as frien"s, hen the hour of"estiny brings you hither but if you neglect our or"s an" are "isgrace"in your li!es, no one ill elco%e or recei!e you& This is the %essagehich is to be "eli!ere" to our chil"ren&

    N.o%e of us ha!e fathers an" %others still li!ing, an" e oul" urge the%,if, as is liely, e shall "ie, to bear the cala%ity as lightly as

    possible, an" not to con"ole ith one another for they ha!e sorrosenough, an" ill not nee" any one to stir the% up& 'hile e gently healtheir oun"s, let us re%in" the% that the Go"s ha!e hear" the chief part oftheir prayers for they praye", not that their chil"ren %ight li!e fore!er, but that they %ight be bra!e an" renone"& >n" this, hich is the

    greatest goo", they ha!e attaine"& > %ortal %an cannot expect to ha!ee!erything in his on life turning out accor"ing to his ill an" they, ifthey bear their %isfortunes bra!ely, ill be truly "ee%e" bra!e fathers ofthe bra!e& ut if they gi!e ay to their sorros, either they ill besuspecte" of not being our parents, or e of not being such as our

    panegyrists "eclare& =et not either of the to alternati!es happen, butrather let the% be our chief an" true panegyrists, ho sho in their li!es

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    30/32

    that they are true %en, an" ha" %en for their sons& :f ol" the saying,O;othing too %uch,O appeare" to be, an" really as, ell sai"& )or hehose happiness rests ith hi%self, if possible, holly, an" if not, as faras is possible,FFho is not hanging in suspense on other %en, or changingith the !icissitu"e of their fortune,FFhas his life or"ere" for the best&-e is the te%perate an" !aliant an" ise an" hen his riches co%e an" go,hen his chil"ren are gi!en an" taen aay, he ill re%e%ber the pro!erbFFO;either rejoicing o!er%uch nor grie!ing o!er%uch,O for he relies uponhi%self& >n" such e oul" ha!e our parents to beFFthat is our or" an"ish, an" as such e no offer oursel!es, neither la%enting o!er%uch, norfearing o!er%uch, if e are to "ie at this ti%e& >n" e entreat ourfathers an" %others to retain these feelings throughout their future life,an" to be assure" that they ill not please us by sorroing an" la%entingo!er us& ut, if the "ea" ha!e any nole"ge of the li!ing, they ill

    "isplease us %ost by %aing the%sel!es %iserable an" by taing their%isfortunes too %uch to heart, an" they ill please us best if they beartheir loss lightly an" te%perately& )or our life ill ha!e the noblest en"hich is !ouchsafe" to %an, an" shoul" be glorifie" rather than la%ente"&>n" if they ill "irect their %in"s to the care an" nurture of our i!esan" chil"ren, they ill soonest forget their %isfortunes, an" li!e in a

    better an" nobler ay, an" be "earer to us&

    NThis is all that e ha!e to say to our fa%iliesB an" to the state eoul" sayFFTae care of our parents an" of our sonsB let her orthilycherish the ol" age of our parents, an" bring up our sons in the right ay&ut e no that she ill of her on accor" tae care of the%, an" "oes notnee" any exhortation of ours&N

    This, : ye chil"ren an" parents of the "ea", is the %essage hich they bi"us "eli!er to you, an" hich "o "eli!er ith the ut%ost seriousness& >n"in their na%e beseech you, the chil"ren, to i%itate your fathers, an"you, parents, to be of goo" cheer about yoursel!es for e ill nourishyour age, an" tae care of you both publicly an" pri!ately in any place in

    hich one of us %ay %eet one of you ho are the parents of the "ea"& >n"the care of you hich the city shos, you no yoursel!es for she has%a"e

    pro!ision by la concerning the parents an" chil"ren of those ho "ie inar the highest authority is specially entruste" ith the "uty of atchingo!er the% abo!e all other citi9ens, an" they ill see that your fathers an"%others ha!e no rong "one to the%& The city herself shares in the

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    31/32

    e"ucation of the chil"ren, "esiring as far as it is possible that theirorphanhoo" %ay not be felt by the% hile they are chil"ren she is a parentto the%, an" hen they ha!e arri!e" at %anNs estate she sen"s the% to theirse!eral "uties, in full ar%our cla" an" bringing freshly to their %in"sthe ays of their fathers, she places in their han"s the instru%ents oftheir fathersN !irtues for the sae of the o%en, she oul" ha!e the% fro%the first begin to rule o!er their on houses arraye" in the strength an"ar%s of their fathers& >n" as for the "ea", she ne!er ceases honouringthe%, celebrating in co%%on for all rites hich beco%e the property ofeach an" in a""ition to this, hol"ing gy%nastic an" euestrian contests,an" %usical festi!als of e!ery sort& .he is to the "ea" in the place of ason an" heir, an" to their sons in the place of a father, an" to their

    parents an" el"er in"re" in the place of a guar"ianFFe!er an" alayscaring for the%& Consi"ering this, you ought to bear your cala%ity the

    %ore gently for thus you ill be %ost en"eare" to the "ea" an" to theli!ing, an" your sorros ill heal an" be heale"& >n" no "o you an" all,ha!ing la%ente" the "ea" in co%%on accor"ing to the la, go your ays&

    Qou ha!e hear", Menexenus, the oration of >spasia the Milesian&

    ME;ERE;spasia, ho is only ao%an,shoul" be able to co%pose such a speech she %ust be a rare one&

    .:C+>TE.B 'ell, if you are incre"ulous, you %ay co%e ith %e an" hearher&

    ME;ERE;spasia, .ocrates, an" no hat she islie&

    .:C+>TE.B 'ell, an" "o you not a"%ire her, an" are you not grateful forher speechS

    ME;ERE;

  • 8/12/2019 Etext of Menexenus

    32/32

    ME;ERE;