ethiopian nile irrigation and drainage...

112
THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES ETHIOPIAN NILE IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECT MEGECH PUMP (SERABA) IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECT FINAL RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN REPORT Volume 2/3: Appendices June 2012 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Upload: vunhi

Post on 10-May-2018

249 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA

MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES

ETHIOPIAN NILE IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECT

MEGECH PUMP (SERABA) IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECT

FINAL RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN REPORT

Volume 2/3: Appendices

June 2012

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb350881
Typewritten Text
RP526 v5

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: MAPPING

APPENDIX2: COMPARISON BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND WORLD BANK POLICY

APPENDIX3: LEGAL DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX4: PUBLIC CONSULTATION

APPENDIX 5: WORLD BANK REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION

APPENDIX 6: SURVEY INSTRUMENTS

APPENDIX 7: VALUATION

APPENDIX 8: LEGAL VERIFICATION

APPENDIX 9: VULNERABLE GROUPS AND OPTIONS FOR RESETTLEMENT

APPENDIX 10: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY RESULTS

APPENDIX 11: MONITORING INDICATORS

CDs

CD 1: RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

CD 2: LEGAL VERIFICATION

CD 3: FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS

CD 4: VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS AND RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS

CD 5: MAPPING

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 i

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1. GRIEVANCE REDRESS FORM: AN EXAMPLE ................................................................................. 8

TABLE 2. COMPARISON BETWEEN ETHIOPIAN LEGISLATION AND WORLD BANK OP 4.12 ................... 13

TABLE 3. INTERVIEWS AND MEETINGS ........................................................................................................ 17

TABLE 4. CONSULTATION MEETINGS AND FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS ............................................. 23

TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF CONSULTATION PROCESS ........................................................... 25

TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP ......................................................... 31

TABLE 7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AT SERABA KEBELE, 11 AND 12 FEBRUARY 2010............................ 32

TABLE 8. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS WITH WOMEN: A SYNOPSIS OF RESULTS .............................. 35

TABLE 9. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT ACCORDING TO KEBELE .......... 79

TABLE 10. AVERAGE YIELD PER HETARE OF LAND FOR MAJOR CROPS .................................................. 85

TABLE 11. MARKET PRICES OF ANNUAL CROPS IN DEMBIA WOREDA ...................................................... 86

TABLE 12. LOCAL MARKET PRICES FOR EUCALYPTUS, NATURALLY PLANTED AND PERENNIAL TREES 87

TABLE 13. COST OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ONE HAND DUG WELL. ............................................................ 88

TABLE 14. AVERAGE YIELD PER HECTARE OF LAND FOR MAJOR CROPS PRODUCED IN THE PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................................................. 91

TABLE 15. LOCAL MARKET PRICE FOR EUCALYPTUS AND INDIGENOUS TREES .................................... 91

TABLE 16. SUMMARY OF THE PAYMENT SCHEDULE (FOR THREE YEARS) .............................................. 94

TABLE 17. VULNERABLE GROUPS: QUESTIONNAIRE TABLE ...................................................................... 96

TABLE 18. RESETTLEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSES: QUESTIONNAIRE TABLE ................................. 97

TABLE 19. HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS AGE BY KEBELE ................................................................................... 98

TABLE 20. GENDER OF HOUSEHOLD HEADS BY KEBELE ........................................................................... 98

TABLE 21. LITERACY LEVEL ACCORDING TO AGE OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE .................. 99

TABLE 22. PHYSICAL STATUS OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE .................................................... 99

TABLE 23. RELATIONSHIP OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS TO HOUSEHOLD HEADS BY KEBELE .............. 100

TABLE 24. EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE ........................................... 100

TABLE 25. SECONDARY EMPLOYMENT OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE .................................. 101

TABLE 26. FORMAL LAND POSSESSION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY KEBELE .................................................. 101

TABLE 27. ANNUAL INCOME OF HOUSEHOLDS BY KEBELE ...................................................................... 103

TABLE 28. EXAMPLES OF MONITORING INDICATORS OF PROJECT-AFFECTED PEOPLE ..................... 105

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1. ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF THE MEGECH/SERABA IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SCHEME .... 1

FIGURE 2. LAND USE MAP OF THE MEGECH/SERABA IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SCHEME ................. 2

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 ii

FIGURE 3. CADASTRAL MAP OF THE MEGECH/SERABA IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SCHEME ............. 3

FIGURE 4. STRUCTURAL (ENGINEERING) MAP OF THE MEGECH/SERABA IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SCHEME ........................................................................................................................................... 4

FIGURE 5. PARCELS (LANDHOLDERS) AFFECTED BY THE MEGECH/SERABA IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SCHEME ........................................................................................................................ 5

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 1

Figure 1. Administrative Map of the Megech/Seraba Irrigation and Drainage Scheme

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 2

Figure 2. Land Use Map of the Megech/Seraba Irrigation and Drainage Scheme

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 3

Figure 3. Cadastral Map of the Megech/Seraba Irrigation and Drainage Scheme

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 4

Figure 4. Structural (Engineering) Map of the Megech/Seraba Irrigation and Drainage Scheme

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 5

Figure 5. Parcels (Landholders) Affected by the Megech/Seraba Irrigation and Drainage Scheme

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 6

EXAMPLES OF LETTERS OF COMPENSATION REGARDING LANDHOLDERS

MEGECH (SERABA) IRRIGATION SCHEME

The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Date: ----------- Ministry of Water and Energy Subject: Confirmation by the Landholder in Relation to Compensation for House I, the undersigned, registered under Rural Landholding Book No. ------------- in the Amhara National

Regional State, North Gondar Zone, Dembia Woreda Administration, of -------------------------- Kebele, hereby

declare that with the permission of myself, my son/daughter or --------------------------------------------- Ato/W/ro

------------------------------------ has constructed his/her residential house on my landholding. This house has

been affected by the Megech (Seraba) Irrigation Project. Therefore I hereby confirm and permit that

Ato/W/ro -------------------------------- receive directly the total compensation for the said impacted house from

the Government.

Name: ----------------------------------

Signature: -----------------------------

Date: ------------------------------------

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 7

MEGECH (SERABA) IRRIGATION SCHEME

The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Date: ----------- Ministry of Water and Energy Subject: Confirmation by the Landholder in Relation to Compensation for Trees I, the undersigned, registered under Rural Landholding Book No. ------------- in the Amhara National

Regional State, North Gondar Zone, Dembia Woreda Administration, of ----------------------------- Kebele,

hereby declare that with the permission of myself, my son/daughter or ------------------------------------Ato/W/ro

---------------------------------- has planted trees on my landholding. The trees have been affected by the

Megech (Seraba) Irrigation Project. Therefore I hereby confirm and permit that Ato/W/ro -----------------------

receive directly the total compensation for the said impacted trees from the Government.

Name: ----------------------------------

Signature: ----------------------------

Date: -----------------------------------

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 8

TABLE 1. GRIEVANCE REDRESS FORM: AN EXAMPLE

GRIEVANCE FORM

Grievance Number: Copies to be forwarded to:

Name of Recorder: (Original) Receiver Party:

Region:

Zone: (Copy) Responsible Party:

Woreda:

Kebele:

Sub-Kebele (Village/Got):

Date:

INFORMATION ABOUT THE GRIEVANCE

DEFINE THE GRIEVANCE:

INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPLAINANT

Name: Form of Receipt:

Telephone No.: Written

Address: Mail

Region: Informal

Zone: Telephone

Woreda: Community/informal meetings

Kebele: Other (specify)

Sub-Kebele (Village/Got)

DETAILS OF GRIEVANCE

Access to Land and Resources:

land

grazing land

house

commercial site

other (specify)

Damage to:

house

land

livestock

means of livelihood

other (specify)

Damage to Infrastructure or Community Assets:

passageway

water sources, water infrastructure for irrigation/animals

drinking water

other (specify)

Decrease or Loss of Livelihood:

agriculture

animal husbandry

off-farm activity

other (specify)

Traffic Accident:

injury to persons

damage to property

damage to livestock

other (specify)

Incidents Regarding Land Acquisition and Compensation (Specify)

Relocation Process (Specify)

Land Redistribution Process (Specify)

Employment and Recruitment (Specify)

Other (Specify)

Model Arbitration Agreement in English and Amharic

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 9

Arbitration Agreement Between

Megech (Seraba) Irrigation Project Affected Person And

Dembia Woreda Administration

1. This Arbitration Agreement has been entered in to between Ato/W/ro

_____________________________________ (herenafter referred to as the “Project Affected Person”

or “PAP”) and the Dembia Woreda Administration (hereinafter referred to as “the Woreda”);

2. The objective of this Arbitration Agreement shall be to submit the grievance(s) of the PAP to the Arbitral

Tribunal, composed of members appointed by the PAP & the Woreda, and to secure a written award

from the Arbitral Tribunal;

3. The types of grievance(s) to be submitted to the arbitration & therewith to the Arbitral Tribunal shall be

disputes between the PAP & the Woreda in relation to the extent/quantum of compensation of the

properties on the rural landholding of the PAP affected by the project & method of assessment of such

compensation including the denial or quantum of some applicable rehabilitation measure(s)/assistance

as per the Entitlement Matrix of the Project;

4. This Arbitration Agreement shall not be applicable to land acquisition or expropriation measure taken by

the Woreda; No grievance in relation to land acquisition measure taken by the Woreda shall, in no case,

be submitted to arbitration process hereunder;

5. The place of arbitration shall be Dembia Woreda Administration;

6. The language of the arbitration shall be Amharic;

7. The number of arbitrators shall be three.

8. The PAP shall appoint his/her arbitrator. The Woreda shall also appoint its arbitrator. The two arbitrators

respectively appointed by the PAP & the Woreda shall jointly appoint the chairperson.

9. The appointment of the chairperson & acceptance of same by such chairperson shall constitute the

formation of the Arbitral Tribunal.

10. The procedure before the Arbitral Tribunal shall be as follows;

a) the PAP shall submit his/her grievance to the Arbitral Tribunal within ---------days after the

formation of the Arbitral Tribunal;

b) the Arbitral Tribunal shall send the grievance of the PAP to the Woreda within--------days of the

receipt of same;

c) the Woreda shall submit its reply to the grievance of the PAP within------------days of the receipt

of the grievance from the Arbitral Tribunal;

d) the Arbitral may grant additional opportunity to the PAP ,where necessary, to provide additional

replies to the reply of the Woreda; in such case, the PAP shall submit its counter reply to the

Arbitral Tribunal within-----------days from the request made by the Arbitral Tribunal;

e) the Arbitral Tribunal may conduct oral hearing before giving its award;

f) during such oral hearing, if any, the Arbitral Tribunal shall accord equal opportunity both to the

PAP & the Woreda to present their case, argument & evidence;

g) the Arbitral Tribunal shall deliberate on the case, argument & evidence submitted to it to

support the grievance of the PAP & to reject the grievance of the PAP by the Woreda;

h) the Arbitral Tribunal shall give its award within ------------days calculated from its formation;

i) the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal may be unanimously or by majority vote;

j) the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be signed by the members of same;

11. The award of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be in writing & shall be given forthwith to the PAP & the Woreda;

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 10

12. The award of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be based on the principles of law & shall show reasons up on

which the award based;

13. The award of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be final & binding; No appeal shall lie to regular court of

competent jurisdiction except on the ground(s) as provided under the Civil Procedure Code;

14. The Arbitral Tribunal shall follow the provisions of the Civil Code from Article 3325-Article 3346 and

shall also follow the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code to discharge its function;

15. The Arbitral Tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction;

16. The PAP & the Woreda shall cooperate with the Arbitral Tribunal to commence, undertake & finalize its

function under this Arbitration Agreement;

17. The Woreda shall provide venue for the Arbitral Tribunal;

18. The members of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be paid fees for their services;

19. The fee of the arbitrators & any other cost in relation to the arbitration process shall be borne by the

Project;

Done at Dembia Woreda on this day __________of the month of______________2003 E.C _______________________

________________________

The PAP for the Woreda

Witnesses: 1. ___________________ _____________________

2. ___________________ ______________________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 11

በመገጭ (ሰራባ) የመስኖ ልማት ፕሮጀክት በተነካ ሰው እና

በደምቢያ ወረዳ አስተዳደር መካከል

የተደረገ የግልግል ዳኝነት ስምምነት

1. ይህ የግልግል ዳኝነት ስምምነት በአቶ/ወ/ሮ____________________________________(ከዚህ በኋላ በዚህ ስምምነት “በፕሮጀክቱ

የተነካ ሰው” ተብሎ በሚታወቀው) እና በደምቢያ ወረዳ አስተዳደር (ከዚህ በኋላ በዚህ ስምምነት ውስጥ “ወረዳው”

ተብሎ በሚታወቀው) መካከል ተደረገ፡፡

2. የግልግል ዳኝነቱ ስምምነት ዓላማ በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ያለውን ቅሬታ(ዎች) በእርሱና በወረዳው ለሚሾሙና

ለሚቋቋመው የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤ ለማቅረብና ከጉባኤው ውሳኔ ለማግኘት ይሆናል፡፡

3. ለግልግል ዳኝነት ሂደት አብሮም ለግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ሊቀርቡ የሚችሉት በፕሮጀክቱ በተነካው ሰውና በወረዳው

መካከል በፕሮጀክቱ በተነካው ንብረት ምክንያት በሚከፈለው የካሳ መጠን እና የካሳ አወሳሰኑን በተመለከተ ያሉ

ቅሬታዎች እንዲሁም በፕሮጀክቱ የመብትና ጥቅሞች ሠንጠረዥ መሠረት አግባብነት ያለው የመልሶ ማቋቋሚያ

ድጋፍ በመከልከሉ ወይም መጠኑን በተመለከተ ያለውን ቅሬታ ጭምር ይሆናል፡፡

4. ይህ የግልግል ዳኝነት ስምምነት ለፕሮጀክቱ የሚያስፈልገውን መሬት ለመውሰድ በወረዳው የሚወሰደውን ርምጃ

አይመለከትም፡፡ ስለሆነም በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካውን ሰው የገጠር መሬት ይዞታ ለፕሮጀክቱ ለማዋል በወረዳው

የሚወሰደውን ርምጃ በተመለከተ ሊኖር የሚችል ቅሬታ በዚህ የግልግል ዳኝነት ስምምነት መሠረት ለግልግል ዳኝነት

ጉባኤው በማናቸውም ሁኔታ ሊቀርብ አይችልም፡፡

5. የግልግል ዳኝነት ሥፍራው የደምቢያ ወረዳ አስተዳደር ይሆናል፡፡

6. የግልግል ዳኝነት ቋንቋው አማርኛ ይሆናል፡፡

7. የግልግል ዳኞች ብዛት ሦስት ይሆናል፡፡

8. በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው የበኩሉን የግልግል ዳኛ ይሾማል፡፡ ወረዳውም የበኩሉን የግልግል ዳኛ ይሾማል፡፡ በፕሮጀክቱ

በተነካው ሰውና በወረዳው የተሾሙት የግልግል ዳኞች ሰብሳቢ የግልግል ዳኛ በጋራ መርጠው ይሾማሉ፡፡

9. የሰብሳቢው ግልግል ዳኛ መሾምና የሰብሳቢውም ይህንኑ ሹመት መቀበል የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤውን መቋቋም

ይገልጻል፡፡

10. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው የሚከተለው ሥነ-ሥርዓት ይኖረዋል፡፡

ሀ) በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ያለውን ቅሬታ የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው በተመሠረተ በ_______ቀን ውስጥ ለጉባኤው

በጽሁፍ ያቀርባል፡፡

ለ) የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ያቀረበውን ቅሬታ በተቀበለ በ____________ቀን ውስጥ

ለወረዳው ይልካል፡፡

ሐ) ወረዳው በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ቅሬታ ከጉባኤው በደረሰው በ________ ቀን ውስጥ ለቅሬታው ያለውን መልስ

ለጉባኤው በጽሁፍ ያቀርባል፡፡

መ)የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው አስፈላጊ ሆኖ ካገኘው በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ወረዳው ለሰጠው መልስ የመልስ መልስ

እንዲሰጥ ሊያዝ ይችላል፡፡ እንዲህ ከሆነ በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው የጉባኤው ትዕዛዝ በደረሰው በ______ ቀን ውስጥ

የመልስ መልሱን ለጉባኤው ያቀርባል፡፡

ሠ)የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔ ከመስጠቱ በፊት የቃል ክርክር እንዲካሄድ ሊያደርግ ይችላል፡፡

ረ)የቃል ክርክሩ የሚካሄድ ከሆነ የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው በፕሮጀክቱ ለተነካው ሰውና ለወረዳው

ጉዳያቸውን፤ክርክራቸውንና ማስረጃቸውን ለጉባኤው እንዲያሰሙ እኩል እድል ይሰጣቸዋል፡፡

ሰ)የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ያቀረበውን ቅሬታ፤ ቅሬታውን ለመደገፍ ያቀረበውን ክርክርና

ማስረጃ፤ እንዲሁም ወረዳው ለቀረበበት ቅሬታ ያቀረበውን መከላከያና መከላከያውን ለመደገፍ ያቀረበውን ክርክርና

ማስረጃ ይመረምራል፡፡

ሸ)የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው በተቋቋመ በ______ ቀን ውስጥ ለጉዳዩ ውሳኔ ይሰጣል፡፡

ቀ)የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔ በሙሉ ድምጽ ወይም በአብላጫ ድምጽ ሊሆን ይችላል፡፡

በ)የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔ በጉባኤው አባላት መፈረም አለበት፡፡

11. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔውን በጽሁፍ መስጠት አለበት፤የውሳኔውም ቅጅ በፕሮጀክቱ ለተነካው ሰውና

ለወረዳው ወዲያውኑ መሰጠት አለበት፡፡

12. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔ በሕግ ላይ የተመሠረተና ውሳኔው የተመሠረተበትን ምክንያት መግለጽ አለበት፡፡

13. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔ የመጨረሻና አስገዳጅ ይሆናል፤ ስለሆነም በፍትሐብሄር ሥነ-ሥርዓት ሕግ

በተመለከተው መሠረት ካልሆነ በስተቀር በግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ውሳኔ ላይ ለመደበኛው ፍርድ ቤት የሚቀርብ

ይግባኝ አይኖርም፡፡

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 12

14. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ሥራውን ለማከናወን በፍትሐ ብሄር ሕግ ከቁጥር 3325 አስከ ቁጥር 3346 በአሉት

ድንጋጌዎች እንዲሁም በፍትሐ ብሄር ሥነ-ሥርዓት ሕግ አግባብነት በአላቸው ድንጋጌዎች መሠረት ይመራል፡፡

15. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው ሥልጣኑን በተመለከተ ራሱ መወሰን ይችላል፡፡

16. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው በዚህ የግልግል ዳኝነት ስምምነት መሠረት ተግባሩን መጀመር፤ማካሄድና ማጠናቀቅ ይችል

ዘንድ በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰውና ወረዳው የመተባበር ግዴታ አለባቸው፡፡

17. ወረዳው ለግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው የማስቻያ ሥፍራ ማዘጋጀት አለበት፡፡

18. የግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው አባላት ለሚሰጡት አገልግሎት ክፍያ ይከፈላቸዋል፡፡

19. ለግልግል ዳኝነት ጉባኤው አባላት የሚከፈለው ክፍያና የግልግል ዳኝነት ሂደቱ የሚጠይቀው የሥራ ማስኬጃ ወጭ

በፕሮጀክቱ ይሸፈናል፡፡

በደምቢያ ወረዳ________________ቀን_______________ወር 2003 ዓ.ም ተደረገ፡፡

________________________ _____________________________

በፕሮጀክቱ የተነካው ሰው ስለ ወረዳው

ምስክሮች 1. _________________________

2. ________________________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 13

TABLE 2. COMPARISON BETWEEN ETHIOPIAN LEGISLATION AND WORLD BANK OP 4.12

Theme World Bank OP/4.12 Ethiopian Legislation Comparison Recommendations to Address Gaps

Policy Objective World Bank OP 4.12 has overall policy objectives, requiring that:

Involuntary resettlement should be avoided wherever possible, or minimised, exploring all alternatives

Resettlement programs should be sustainable, include meaningful consultation with affected parties, and provide benefits to the affected parties

Displaced persons should assisted in improving livelihoods etc, or at least restoring them to previous levels

Proclamation No 455/2005 (Article 3(1)) gives power to Woreda urban administration to “expropriate rural or urban landholdings for public purpose where it believes that it should be used for a better development…” This is supported by Article 51(5) and Article 40(8) of the 1995 Constitution.

Proclamation No 455/2005 (Article 7(5)) states that “the cost of removal, transportation and erection shall be paid as compensation for a property that could be relocated and continue its service as before.”

The World Bank requirement for avoidance or minimisation of involuntary resettlement is not written into Ethiopian legislation. However, this is expected to be made clear in the Regulations and Guidelines to be developed in association with Proclamation No 455/2005. Proclamation No 455/2005 does not require consultation with displaced persons throughout the resettlement process, rather it only allows for a complaints and grievance process. Also, although Proclamation No 455/2005 allows for some form of support to the displaced persons, it does not explicitly state that livelihoods should be restored to previous levels or improved.

World Bank OP4.12 overall policy objectives should be applied in terms of avoiding and minimising involuntary resettlement, ensuring that resettlement programs are sustainable and include meaningful consultation.

Notification Period/Timing of Displacement

Article 10 of World Bank OP/4.12 requires that the resettlement activities associated with a subproject are linked to the implementation of the EIDP programme to ensure that displacement or restriction of access does not occur before necessary measures for resettlement are in place. In particular, taking of land and related assets may take place only after compensation has been paid, and, where applicable resettlement sites and moving allowances have been provided to displaced persons.

Article 4 of Proclamation No 455/2005 requires notification in writing, with details of timing and compensation, which cannot be less than 90 days from notification. It requires that land should be handed over within 90 days of payment of compensation should the leaseholder accept payment. If there is no crop or other property on the land, it must be handed over within 30 days of notice of expropriation. It further gives power to seize the land through police force should the landholder be unwilling to hand over the land.

The requirements for proclamation No 455/2005 allow land to be expropriated before necessary measures for resettlement have taken place, particularly before the displaced person has been paid. This can have serious consequences for those affected, as they may be displaced without shelter or livelihood.

Displaced person should always be paid compensation and support before the land is handed over, as per World Bank OP 4.12.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 14

Theme World Bank OP/4.12 Ethiopian Legislation Comparison Recommendations to Address Gaps

Eligibility for Compensation

World Bank OP 4.12 gives eligibility to:

those who have formal legal rights to the land;

those who do not have formal legal rights to land, but have a claim to such land; and

those who do not have recognisable legal right or claim to the land

Proclamation No 455/2005, Article 7(1) allows ‘landholders’ to be eligible for compensation, where the term “landholder” (Article 2(3)) means ”an individual, government or private organisation or any other organ which has legal personality and has lawful possession over the land to be expropriated and owns property situated thereon”.

Proclamation No 456/255; Article 6(1) accepts the existence of communal land.

According to World Bank OP 4.12, eligibility for compensation is granted to all affected parties. Ethiopian Legislation only grants compensation to those with lawful possession of the land and, as per Proclamation No 456, those with traditional possession i.e. on communal land. It therefore does not recognise those without a legal right or claim as eligible for compensation.

The requirements of World Bank OP 4.12 should apply.

Compensation World Bank OP 4.12 Article 6(a) requires that displaced persons are provided with prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses of assets attributable directly to the project. If physical relocation is an impact, displaced persons must be provided with assistance during relocation and residential housing, housing sites and/or agricultural sites to at least equivalent standards as the previous site. Replacement cost does not take depreciation into account. In terms of valuing assets, if the residual of the asset being taken is not economically viable, compensation and assistance must be provided as if the entire asset had been taken.

Article 7 of Proclamation No 455/2005 entitles the landholder to compensation for the property on the land on the basis of replacement cost; and permanent improvements to the land, equal to the value of capital and labor expended.

Where property is on urban land, compensation may not be less than constructing a single room low-cost house as per the region in which it is located. It also requires that the cost of removal, transportation and erection will be paid as compensation for a relocated property continuing its service as before. Valuation formulae are to be provided by regulations.

The World Bank requirement for compensation and valuation of assets is that compensation and relocation must result in the affected person having property and livelihood returned to them to at least equivalent standards as before. This is not required in Ethiopian law. Rural landholders are not compensated for rental housing during relocation, and in fact there is no need to compensate urban dwellers for the market value of the property that has been expropriated, thus they may receive smaller, less valuable plots. It also does not compensate urban dwellers for lost income. it is hoped and expected that the regulation and directives will provide more clarity and clearer guidance in this regard.

The World Bank requirements for compensation must be followed, as per OP 4.12 Footnote 1, which states, “Where domestic law does not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost, compensation under domestic law is supplemented by additional measures necessary to meet the replacement cost standard”.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 15

Theme World Bank OP/4.12 Ethiopian Legislation Comparison Recommendations to Address Gaps

Valuation and Amount of Displacement Compensation

With regard to land and structures, ‘replacement cost’ is defined as follows: For agricultural land it is the pre-project or pre-displacement, whichever is higher, market value of land of equal productive potential or use located in vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of preparing the land to levels similar to those of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes.

For land in urban areas, it is the pre-displacement market value of land of equal size and use, with similar or improved public infrastructure facilities and services, and located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes.

For houses and other structures, it is the market cost of the materials to build a replacement structure with an area and quality similar to or better than those of the affected structure, plus the cost of transporting building materials to the construction site, plus the cost of any labour and contractors’ fees, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes.

Article 8 of Proclamation No 455/2005 allows for rural landholders whose landholdings have been permanently expropriated to be paid compensation according to Article 7 (above), as well as displacement compensation equivalent to ten times the annual average secured during the five years preceding the expropriation of land. Where the landholding has been provisionally expropriated, the annual average income shall also be applied, but only until possession of the land, but not exceeding 10 years. If equivalent substitute land is available, this shall equal the average annual income.

Article 9 requires that the valuation of property is carried out by a certified private or public institution or private consultant as per the valuation formulae as mentioned above. Until these regulations are promulgated, a Valuation Committee will undertake the task. The committee must be made up of experts with relevant qualifications.This must be designated by the Woreda Administration. A specialised committee of experts may also be set up separately if required. (Committee procedures will be determined by directives).

Compensation according to the World Bank is broader and ensures that all property and inputs to livelihoods are taken into account, including the costs associated with developing new livelihoods to the same standards or better.

Ethiopian legislation relating to rural landholders is relatively fair, and will be expanded upon by the regulations to be promulgated. For urban landholders, this is insufficient. This will also be clarified with the issuance of the new regulation. Until the regulations are promulgated, the legislation requires valuation to be carried out by a committee with the relevant qualifications, and ideally this should include an independent expert, as suggested for when the valuation formulae have been released.

As above, The World Bank requirements for compensation must be followed, as per OP 4.12 Footnote 1, which states, “Where domestic law does not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost, compensation under domestic law is supplemented by additional measures necessary to meet the replacement cost standard”.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 16

Theme World Bank OP/4.12 Ethiopian Legislation Comparison Recommendations to Address Gaps

Responsibilities of the Project Proponent

According to OP 4.12 (including Articles 14 and 18), the borrower is responsible for conducting a census and preparing, implementing, and monitoring the appropriate resettlement instrument. Article 24 states that the borrower is also responsible for an adequate monitoring and evaluation instrument. In addition, upon completion of the project, the borrower must undertake an assessment to determine whether the objectives of the resettlement instrument have been achieved. This must all be done according to the requirements of OP 4.12. Article 19 requires that the borrower informs potentially displaced persons at an early stage about the resettlement aspects of the project and takes their views into account in project design.

Article 5 of Proclamation No 455/2005 sets out the responsibilities of the implementing agency, requiring them to gather data on the land needed and the works, and to send these to the appropriate officials for permission. It also requires them to pay compensation to affected landholders.

The process required for the project proponent/ implementing agency is very much less according to Ethiopian Legislation. This does not require the implementing agency to undergo a planning process (e.g. RAP) or a certain process for implementation, and for monitoring and evaluating whether the resettlement has been successful.

The EIDP programme must ensure that where resettlement is required, a specific process must be followed as per the World Bank requirements. This must include screening, a census, the development of a plan, management of compensation payments, and monitoring and evaluation of success. It must also include proper consultation with the affected parties throughout the process.

(Compiled by SMEC, 2010)

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 17

TABLE 3. INTERVIEWS AND MEETINGS

DATE (2010)

LOCATION INDIVIDUAL/S CONSULTED ISSUES DISCUSSED

22 January

Regional EPLAUA Office, Bahir Dar

Ato Gebeyehu, and other Staff Project start-up meeting; introduction of the Consultant team, and discussion of objectives of the team; data collection

23 January

Dembia Woreda EPLAUA Office, Kola Dibe

Ato Sebsebachew Atnafu (ph: 0918046963), Head, Dembia Woreda EPLAUA

Introduction of the Consultant team and objectives of the team, the way forward, and cooperation in the identification of Project start-up

Dembia Woreda Administration Office, Kola Dibe

Woreda Administrator and EPLAUA staff Introduction and discussion of objective of the team, as to how to cooperate during surveying, and on government support regarding security and creating awareness

28 January

MoWE, Addis Ababa Ato Hayalsew and Tahal Group Consultancy team

Overall design status and how to proceed with ground truthing; arranged a programme with TAHAL to locate the start point jointly on field

05 February

Regional EPLAUA Office, Bahir Dar

Ato Getachew Jenber (ph: 0918340695), Head, EPLAUA; Ato Seleshi Temesgen, Deputy Head, EPLAUA; Ato Bayeh Tiruneh, Head, Land Administration Business Process, EPLAUA

Irrigation developments in the region and Seraba Irrigation project in particular; the role of EPLAUA in the planning and implementation of the Project; possibility to avoid/minimise resettlement; if unavoidable, tasks accomplished relative to the Project, resettlement options, land redistribution/consolidation, status of cadastral mapping in the Project area; experience of similar project in the Region (Koga). SMEC was informed that three implementation committees had been formed to work on the RAP: a Property Valuation Committee, a Compensation and Grievances Committee, and an Irrigation and Land Redistribution Committee. Although there was a programme for creating awareness of the Project with communities, more consultation was required);

Gebeyehu Belay, Land Administration Expert, EPLAUA

Issues related in the preparation of the RAP, information available in the office that can support the RAP preparation etc.

Ato Sisay Asres, Head, Irrigation and Drainage Business Process Unit

Role of the unit; Bureau’s relationship with the Project; resettlement options; focus on fairness of land redistribution for the Project to be sustainable; issue of host community, if any

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 18

DATE (2010)

LOCATION INDIVIDUAL/S CONSULTED ISSUES DISCUSSED

North Gondar Zone Regional offices

Dr. Taddese Amsalu, Advisor to the President of Amhara National Regional State on Irrigation, Water Resources and Catchments

Policy direction of the Region in terms of irrigation; nature of the Project; experience of the region in the preparation of RAP and its implementation; sharing experience on Koga irrigation project; caution to be taken during the process of property valuation; on grievance management; Project cost sharing by the peasants

BoWRD Office, Bahir Dar Mamaru Tsediku, Head, BoWRD Regional irrigation development experiences and the role of the Regional Bureau on similar projects; the availability of information in the Bureau that can support the participation of the RAP

ENIDP Office, Bahir Dar Ato Berhanu Ayichew (ph: 0918761428), Project Director/Coordinator of ENIDP

Role of the office vis-à-vis planning and implementation of the Project; further information on the Project; resettlement policy of the World Bank; irrigation developments in the region and Seraba Irrigation project in particular

08 February

North Gondar Zone Administration offices

Ato Agegnehu Teshager (ph: 0918350038), Chief Administrator, North Gondar Zone Administration

Briefing on the Project; plan re stakeholder workshop for the Project; the possible role of the Zone; inviting the Chief Administrator to the workshop

Dembia Woreda EPLAUA Office, Kola Dibe

Ato Sebsebachew Atnafu (ph: 0918046963), Head, Dembia Woreda EPLAUA Office

General issues relating to land administration; land redistribution, land replacement and consolidation experience of the Woreda; landholding profile within the Woreda; composition of the Property Valuation Committee; resolution of disputes relating to landholdings; grievance procedure (in case of extent of compensation) to be followed; eligibility to replacement land; status of cadastral mapping of the Woreda; availability of complete information on landholding status of farmers within the Woreda; administration of communal land; information on communal land within the Woreda; treatment of vulnerable groups (children, people with HIV, women, elderly…) within the context of land administration; possible resettlement framework vis-à-vis the planned Project

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 19

DATE (2010)

LOCATION INDIVIDUAL/S CONSULTED ISSUES DISCUSSED

Dembia Woreda Administration Offices, Kola Dibe

Ato Bayeh Abera, Dembia Woreda Administration Chief Administrator, and Ato Sebsebachew Atnafu, Head Dembia Woreda EPLAUA Office

Possibility to avoid and/or minimise the need for resettlement; if resettlement is unavoidable, on the formulation of feasible RRF; the organisational arrangement of the Woreda; capacity of the Woreda to implement the Project (in terms of resources input); level of public awareness and public attitude towards the Project; management of the effects of land redistribution; experience sharing from similar irrigation projects in the region; criticality of the finalisation of the cadastral mapping task in the Woreda, especially within the Project affected Kebeles; possible problems related to land administration issues (land redistribution, substitution and consolidation) and envisaged solutions; establishment of valuation/compensation and grievance committees at Woreda level; treatment of vulnerable groups within the context of the Project

12 February

Dembia Woreda’s Women Affairs Office, Kola Dibe

Ms Yeshareg Tewaba (ph: 0918724347), Manager of Women Affairs Office, Dembia Woreda

Planning Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with women in the Kebeles affected by the Project

13 February

Dembia Woreda Administration Offices, Kola Dibe

Ato Bayeh Abera, Dembia Woreda Administration Chief Administrator (ph: 0918700703, 0918350205), and members of Dembia Woreda Project Steering Committee: Ato Sebsbachew Atnafu (ph: 0918-046963), Head, Woreda EPLAUA Office; Ato Yohannes Sisay; Ato Zewdu Fetene, Head, WoFED Office; Ato Hailu Gebeyehu, Head, Woreda Public Relations Office; Ato Honelign Addisu, Head, Woreda Youth Association; Ato Daniel Gebeyehu, Head, Woreda Health Office; Ato Abelneh Seyoum, Woreda BoARD Agronomist; Ato Zerihun Abebe, Head, WoARD, Natural Resource Conservation; Ato Sitotaw

Perception of the Woreda about the project; advantages and possible disadvantages of the Project; ways to avoid/minimise resettlement, and development of possible resettlement options and formulation of RRF; plan to undertake public consultation, and support to be given by the Woreda; institutional arrangement of the Woreda for the implementation of the Project; capacity building requirements of the Woreda for the better implementation of the Project; land issues in terms of irrigation land redistribution, land substitution and consolidation; the need for having all-weather road to access the Project site; experience sharing from similar projects executed within the region; composition of the Property Valuation Committee

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 20

DATE (2010)

LOCATION INDIVIDUAL/S CONSULTED ISSUES DISCUSSED

15 February

Regional EPLAUA Office, Bahir Dar

Ato Getachew Jenber (ph: 0918340695), Head, Regional EPLAUA

Possible formulation of feasible RRF for the Project; issues of construction of all-weather road within the Project site; capacity building of the Woreda; availability of relevant Project documentation to the Woreda; experience sharing from Koga irrigation and resettlement project by the Woreda; number on the Property Valuation Committee: cadastral map as critical input to the Project

ENIDP RPCO, Bahir Dar Ato Mulugeta Seid, Head, Regional Project Steering Committee; Ato Berhanu Ayichew, Project Director/Coordinator of ENIDP

Formulation of RRF for the Project; compensation and its nature and duration; a concern of stakeholders around awareness creation on Project activities, particularly compensation issues; the need for clear, transparent, understandable modalities/procedures to be put in place in the valuation of properties to ensure the smooth operation of the Project; mistakes in RAPs for other projects (e.g. Koga Irrigation Project) not to be repeated

BoWRD Ofice, Bahir Dar Ato Mamaru Tsediku, Head, BoWRD RRF in the envisaged Project and role of the Bureau in the process; issue of irrigation land redistribution, including land consolidation; the role of WUAs; experience/opinion of the Bureau on irrigation development in the region

ORDA (Organisation for Rehabilitation and Development in Amahar) main office, Bahir Dar

Ato Ewunetu (ph: 0918765938), Director for Water Resource Development of ORDA

Overview of ORDA, and particularly the function of Water Resource Deveopment within the organisation

Ms Workwona Mekonen (ph: 0911633392) and Ms Tigist Gilimay (ph: 0913200248) of the Women’s Research Desk

The role of the Women’s Research Desk within ORDA (gender mainstreaming), and women’s issues in the area

16 February

Bureau of Women Affairs (BoWA), Amhara National Regional State, Bahir Dar

Ms Wollela Mebrat (ph: 0918769507, 0582265868), Deputy Head of BoWA

The function of the Bureau and how it operates, and particularly the process of gender mainstreaming within Regional local government structures

19 February

Dembia Woreda’s Women Affairs Office, Kola Dibe

Ms Tewaba and her deputy, Wossen Daznew

Confirmation of arrangements around women FGDs

12 May Dembia WoARD Office, Kola Dibe

Ato Abebe, Office Head, WoARD Role and capacity of the office to implement the irrigation project; the availability of information in the office that can support the RAP

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 21

DATE (2010)

LOCATION INDIVIDUAL/S CONSULTED ISSUES DISCUSSED

Dembia EPLAUA Office, Kola Dibe

Ato Sebsebachew, Office Head, EPLAUA Dembia Woreda

Role and capacity of the office to implement the irrigation project; the availability of information in the office that can support the RAP

Dembia Public Health Office, Kola Dibe

Ato Habtamu Aderaw, Public Health Officer, Dembial Woreda Health Office

Role and capacity of the office to implement the irrigation project; the availability of information in the office that can support the RAP

13 May Dembia Public Health Office, Kola Dibe

Mulugeta Sergualem, Planning Officer, Woreda Health Office

Health status of the Woreda, effect of the Project on the service, and problems associated with the sector in the Woreda; the availability of information in the office that can support participation of the RAP

14 May Dembia WoARD Office, Kola Dibe

Adane Muche, Senior Expert, Dembia WoARD

Water resources development status, effect of the Project on the service, and problems associated with the sector in the Woreda; the availability of information in the office that can support the RAP

Dembia Woreda Education Office, Kola Dibe

Worku Degaras, Head, Woreda Education Office

Educational development status; effect of the Project on the service; problems associated with the sector in Dembia Woreda

17 May ACSI Office, Kola Dibe Yalemwork Gebeyaw, Expert, Amhara Credit and Saving Institute (ACSI)

Capacity of the institute, number of members, types of loans; loan provision procedure

4 June Cooperative Office, Kola Dibe Fantahun Workeyi, Process Head, Cooperative Work

Members of the cooperatives; types of loans and other services; loan provision procedure

World Vision Office, Kola Dibe Mekonen Bekele, World Vision Manager Kinds of projects carried out and their magnitude under the NGO

15 June Dembia Woreda Administration Office, Kola Dibe

Ato Baye Abera (ph: 0918350205), Deputy Dembia Woreda Administrator

The Woreda Administration’s capacity to implement the RAP, and related requirements

North Gondar Zone Administration, Gondar

Agegnehu Teshager (ph: 0918350038, 0581110120), Chief Administrator of North Gondar Zone Administration

The Zone Administration’s capacity to take responsibility for implementation of the RAP

16 June Women Affairs Department, North Gondar Zone, Gondar

Ato Omar Hassen (ph: 0918778954) and Ato Guadie Demeke (ph: 0918721128), Coordinators of Gender Mainstreaming, Women Affairs Department of North Gondar Zone

Work of the Department and its potential contribution (and related constraints) to the Project, and NGOs involved in the Zone that may be of interest to the Project

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 22

DATE (2010)

LOCATION INDIVIDUAL/S CONSULTED ISSUES DISCUSSED

17 June ENIDP Office, Bahir Dar Ato Berhanu Ayichew (ph: 0918761428, 0582264368), Project Coordinator of ENIDP

Institutional capacity, particularly at a regional level

17 and 18 June

World Vision offices in Addis Zemen and Bahir Dar

Ato Nathan Samson (ph: 0584440486), and a representative of World Vision in Bahir Dar office

A brief overview of the programmes being undertaken by World Vision in areas relevant to Megech/Seraba Project, such as HIV/AIDS

18 June Amhara National Regional State Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) Office, Bahir Dar

Ato Birru Yitaferu (ph: 0912027600, 0582205174), Soil and Water Research Directorate Director of ARARI

ARARI’s current involvement in the Megech/Seraba Project, including the publication of a related report, with recommendations for future implementation

Amhara National Regional State’s Cooperative Promotion Agency (CPA) Office, Bahir Dar

Ato Bawoke, head of the Region’s CPA The role of the agency in farmers’ organisation, and other possible models for farm management to which the CPA can make a contribution

Amhara National Regional State’s EPLAUA Office, Bahir Dar

Ato Mehretu Dagnew (ph: 0918717882), Land Valuation and Resettlement Alternative Preparation Expert, Regional EPLAUA

The role of Regional EPLAUA in the Project, and its capacity to undertake RAP implementation

Ms Tenagne Kebede (ph: 0911726441), Social Economist Expert, Regional EPLAUA

Acting ‘informally’ as the gender expert of the organisation, her views of land-related issues facing women

26 June Dembia Woreda Administration Office, Kola Dibe

Dembia Woreda Project Steering Committee

Presentation of the Project RRF; organisation of group discussions around the entitlement matrix; what role different organisations will play in implementation of the RAP e.g. EPLAUA, the Administration, and Kebeles

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 23

TABLE 4. CONSULTATION MEETINGS AND FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS

DATE (2010) LOCATION PARTICIPANTS ISSUES DISCUSSED

11 and 12 February

Serabo Dablo Residents of Seraba Dablo Kebele, the Kebele Administration (Ato Abelneh), and Dembia Woreda Administration (Ato Alemneh)

Method of valuation of compensation for property and crops; possible payment of water charge, if any; possible dislocation due to the implementation of the Project, and envisaged resettlement plan; information on irrigation land redistribution process; possibility of compensation for lost land; possible redistribution of communal land due to shortage of land; issues on grazing land and the possibility of having alternative land for grazing; possible loss of communal land and possibility of substitute communal land; the need to fight against dissemination of false information on the taking of land from farmers to give to private investors; impact of the Project on churches and graveyards; possibility to get employment during Project implementation; possible negative impact of the Project on Lake Tana; possible impact on land due to construction of night ponds; resettlement plan to consider distance as a factor; plans to accommodate landless youth

19 February Kola Dibe

20 women representatives of Dembia Woreda’s Women’s Associations (ten from Kebele 01 and ten from Kebele 02) and three representatives of the Woreda’s Women Affairs Desk

Informed the group about the Project; discussed women’s issues in the area, how the Project may potentially impact on women, and the contribution they and/or Women’s Associations may make to the Project

02 March Guramba Bata

Kebele leaders and representatives of youth associations, landless people, elders, women’s associations, credit and saving and marketing cooperatives, and WUAs if any (187 participants)

Information about the area; the kind of changes people perceive coming to their area as a result of the Project; the threats/opportunities people expect from the Project, and problems/issues of concern and solutions; contributions people think they can make to RAP preparation and Project implementation

03 March Seraba Dablo As above, from Seraba Dablo (74) As above

04 March Achera As above, from Achera (23) As above

05 March Meskel Kiristos

As above, from Meskel Kiristos (79) As above

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 24

DATE (2010) LOCATION PARTICIPANTS ISSUES DISCUSSED

09 March Chenker As above, from Chenker (61) As above

10 March Aberjeha As above, from Aberjeha (62) As above

03 May Guramba Bata

Women representatives from Guramba Bata (10)

As above Women representatives from Debre Zuria (10) and Arabia (12)

04 May Women representatives from Jarjar (14), Achera (10) and Seraba Dablo (11)

06 May

Kebele Offices, Meskele Kiristos

Women representatives from Meskel Kiristos (8), Chenker (8) and Aberjeha (8)

As above

01 - 07 July Respective Kebele

PAPs from Guramba Bata, Achera, Seraba (2 groups), Meskel Kiristos, Chenker and Aberjeha (529)

Disclosure of the RRF

08 - 14 July Respective Kebels

PAPs from Guramba Bata, Achera, Seraba (2 groups), Meskel Kiristos, Chenker and Aberjeha (642)

Discussion around the RRF

Note: A list of participants and the minutes of some meetings are attached to this report in the form of a CD.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 25

TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF CONSULTATION PROCESS

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR CONCERNS CONSULTANT RESPONSE AND

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN

Issues Relating to Land

How will we get replacement farmland? Whom do we request for it?

Replacement land will be redistributed by the Region, in collaboration with the Woreda, Kebeles and PAPs, based on the specific guideline issued to that effect. Everybody in the Project Command Area shall contribute to the process of irrigation land redistribution.

What would be our cattle’s fate if the Project affected our communal grazing land and no replacement communal grazing land is provided for?

Replacement land for grazing shall be provided wherever possible; where not possible, the Kebele and PAPS will find a solution.

The Project impacted my land. Do you register only the impacted land or the whole of my landholding?

The Project will register both.

How does the land redistribution take place? Where does extra land come from for such purpose?

Based on relevant federal and regional laws, there is a specific guideline issued by the Region re irrigation land redistribution in modern irrigation. The land redistribution process will be undertaken based on this guideline. Extra land comes through the contribution of farmers within the Project Command Area based on some formula.

Land redistribution may force me to evacuate my landholding. I am not comfortable with this.

Land redistribution is going to be undertaken within the Project Command Area. If the land acquisition plan requires the whole of your landholding for the project, you will be provided with replacement land.

The Project has assured us it will provide us with replacement land. It has also been said that compensation for annual crops may not extend beyond five years. What is meant by that?

If replacement land is given, compensation for annual crops will be given annually. Five years is the maximum time scale for which compensation for annual crops will be paid to a PAP.

We are losing our landholding for the Project. We have been assured of getting compensation, but would the land be taken by the government forever or be returned to us after Project completion?

Replacement land shall be given through land redistribution process, after completion of the RAP. The land required for irrigation structures shall be used permanently to the Project and will not be returned to anybody.

Prior to this Project there were investors around this Kebele. If replacement land to be given, is it going to be given to the investors or to the farmers?

Replacement land shall not be given to investors but to the farmers in that area.

For grazing, grass compensation will be paid. How about the land?

As far as possible replacement land shall be given for grazing land. If not, compensation shall be paid.

My farmland is going to be impacted by a night reservoir. Am I entitled to get replacement farming land?

Compensation, in one way or another, is related to Project impact, the source being due to irrigation canals of different size and night reservoirs. Thus you are entitled to get replacement land for farming provided you fulfill the eligibility criterion for such right.

I have donated part of my farming land to my son. During the land measurement, that farmland has been registered in my name. What would be the entitlement,

This issue is related to legal verification of the identity and status of the PAP for entitlement regarding the land in question. If the Rural Landholding Book remains in

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 26

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR CONCERNS CONSULTANT RESPONSE AND

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN

either to me or to my son?

your name, you are the one to be eligible. If, however, you transferred that piece of the land to your son, the entitlement goes to your son provided your son has secured the Rural Landholding Book in his name. In any event, the entitlement goes to you or to your son.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 27

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR CONCERNS CONSULTANT RESPONSE AND

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN

Issues Related to Compensation

For the assessment of our compensation, a valuation committee shall be established. Will PAPs be included as members of such committee.

The valuation committee has already been established, since the start of the Project. The members are from the Woreda, the Kebele and the Consultant.

Why not pay us compensation for annual crops at one time?

According to the law, compensation for annual crops shall be paid annually.

Compensation for trees should include the first and second generation.

Correct, compensation for trees shall be assessed accordingly.

Compensation for loss of private grazing land, why should it not include other financial compensation if the farmer takes the grass from his grazing land?

Compensation for grazing shall be assessed at once and paid at once. Harvesting and taking of the grass from the field only affects the first year compensation in cash.

Is the annual crop compensation for this year or the coming year?

Next year you may have a chance to harvest and collect your crops from your fields. If the Project commences as planned, you may start getting compensation for annual crops after next year. There is an opportunity, as per the law, to get compensation without collecting the crops even for the first year when the Project starts.

Is there any payment of compensation for ripe and unripe annual crops?

Yes, but the basis for the assessment of such compensation is different for each.

We are using our farmland to produce different products in different years. How is the compensation going to be assessed?

The assessment of such compensation shall take into consideration the type of crop that could be grown in the Project area and its average price for the last five years.

There are farmers who are capable of producing twice a year. How will compensation be assessed?

If there is concrete information on that, the assessment of compensation may consider this issue.

We are producing 3 times in a given production year, by using a generator to irrigate our farmland. How is the compensation going to be assessed?

This is important information for the Project study. The Project will work with the relevant Kebele and Woreda institutions to identify those PAPs working with generators to produce two/ three times a year.

Is compensation for trees only for once, or are you taking into consideration its regenerative value for a certain time?

The assessment of compensation for trees shall take into consideration the regenerative capacity of trees three times.

In relation to annual crop compensation, what do you mean by proportional compensation?

Proportional compensation shall mean to replace, in terms of financial compensation, whatever legitimate financial loss the PAP is exposed to or impacted by the Project.

How is compensation for improvement on land going to be assessed? We have done terracing every year on our field and around our field to conserve water and to improve the productivity of our farmland?

Compensation for improvement on the land is allowed under the law. To be eligible, the cost incurred in relation to such activity shall be identified and assessed provided the activities are recognised by the Project.

Would the amount of compensation be enough to manage and sustain members of my family?

There are different types of compensation. The amount of each type shall be assessed based on the law. Compensation shall be adequate and based on the principle of replacement cost. . There are also other considerations to be made. The PAP shall manage the

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 28

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR CONCERNS CONSULTANT RESPONSE AND

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN

compensation wisely and intelligently to sustain the livelihood of the family.

Why do we not get additional compensation if we cut down and take our trees?

Cutting and taking tress is a recognised optional right available to the PAP. More than that, PAP will get compensation for trees for three years, to be paid at once.

How will compensation be paid out to us? Would it be at once or annually?

There are different types of compensation. Some is paid annually, such as for annual crops, and some is paid at once like compensation for trees, houses and perennial crops.

If the house is demolished, you said that we are expected to leave our homestead. Why are we leaving our houses? Where will we live then?

Houses are to be demolished for the construction of the irrigation structures. Available options are: to continue to live in the same place if there is sufficient land to build a new house, or to be relocated somewhere but within the Project Command Area. Compensation for the construction of a new house shall be given in both cases.

The fertility of the land is different from one place to another. How will compensation for annual crops be assessed?

To calculate compensation the Project shall take a five-year average productivity of the area/Woreda and the market price.

Why is compensation for the reconstruction of the house and for trees so small?

No amount of compensation has been disclosed to date to anyone. If any PAP has a grievance on the amount of compensation after disclosure of it, there is a legal right to appeal and to get redressed provided the grievance has some legitimate ground.

We sell our agricultural produce during the time when the price of the produce is high. Do you consider this situation in the assessment of compensation for annual crops?

The assessment shall be based on the five-year average local market price of the agricultural produce under consideration.

I heard that those people who have been affected by the Project are going to receive compensation. I do not know the details. Please explain.

There are different types of compensation, basically the following: land-to-land compensation/replacement land; financial compensation for properties on the land e.g. compensation for annual crops, houses, trees, perennial crops etc; and some rehabilitative measures in the form of assistance. The basis for compensation shall be the impact of the Project on people, in one way or another, within the Project Command Area, plus fulfilling the eligibility criterion established for the Project.

Who are the ones to get compensation for annual crops for five years?

PAPs whose farmland is affected by the Project. The timescale for the payment of compensation for annual crops shall depend on the duration of the Project (said to be three years). Under law, five years is the maximum timescale for temporal compensation.

We are not clear about the payment of compensation to the Kebele administration with respect to communal grazing land.

Compensation to the Kebele administration for communal grazing land shall be used for community purposes.

Is it obligatory to be relocated somewhere if the house It is not obligatory to be relocated. PAPs who opt for

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 29

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR CONCERNS CONSULTANT RESPONSE AND

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN

is going to be demolished, or is there an alternative – to reconstruct a new house on an available piece of land under my landholding right?

relocation can do that. It is acceptable for PAPs to opt to remain in their current area to construct their new house.

My house is to be demolished totally but the personnel from the Project were not in a position to value part of my veranda. What would be my entitlement?

The amount of compensation for a house shall be based on the extent of impact of the Project on the house i.e. partial or total. If the impact exceeds a certain percentage of damage, it may also be considered as total impact. Your veranda shall also be included in the compensation assessment framework.

My farmland has been impacted partially by the Project. The remaining plot of the farming land may not be sufficient enough for modern irrigation. What would be my options?

This issue shall be handled during the land redistribution process. Your concern shall be addressed regarding the provision of replacement land for farming.

Would it be possible to get compensation for trees without having any landholding right to the land?

In terms of impact and World Bank policy, you may. However, it requires some analysis, how to give effect to such policy-based right.

A certain piece of farming land was in dispute. That land has been impacted by the Project. During the land measurement and property inspection process it is registered in the name of the disputant. Now that piece of the farming land has, legally, been returned to me. Would I be entitled to get any right under the circumstances?

You will be entitled, provided you have a Rural Landholding Book issued in your name including that piece of land that is in dispute.

What are the options for the loss of private grazing land under the Project?

There are two options: getting replacement land, if available, or getting compensation for a certain period of time. If during the commencement of the Project there is any grazing on the land, the PAP may be allowed to cut and take it.

Other Issues

You suggested to us to use fuel-saving stoves. Would there be any bio-fuel problem in our area due to the Project?

The Project may cause the removal of most of the trees in the Project Command Area. In that case, bio-fuel may not be available as before, grounds to recommend the use of fuel-saving stoves.

What would be our fate after two or three years from now due to the Project?

The effect of the Project shall be to improve your living standard by improving your farm business from traditional to modern irrigation. This brings with it an unprecedented opportunity to farm two or three times in a given production year, and thus improvement on income.

After completion of the irrigation Project am I going to farm for myself or for the government?

The land to be acquired for the Project will be used to construct irrigation structures. After Project completion, every PAP in the Project Command Area shall get replacement land, through modern irrigation land redistribution process, and continue farming in the same area but with fundamental changes. You farm for yourself and not for the government.

The Project will affect our common or private grazing As far as possible replacement land shall be given for

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 30

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR CONCERNS CONSULTANT RESPONSE AND

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN

land. This reduces or totally affects the feed for our livestock. What is the plan of the Project to address this problem?

the purpose.

When is the time for the commencement of the Project? And the duration of the Project?

According to information secured from the Client, the commencement time for the Project might be sometime in February 2011, and the duration three years.

When are we expected to demolish our houses? The houses are to be demolished and the land on which the houses were built shall be cleared before the commencement of the construction. The Woreda Administration shall order the clearance of the land and notification of the amount of compensation to every PAP, and the timescale within which the land is to be cleared for the Project.

Is there any plan to resettle all affected people in one place?

There is no such plan.

We should have a priority to get employment during the implementation of the Project.

This shall be one of the important issues as part of the RAP. As far as possible, employment opportunities shall be given to the people in the project area.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 31

TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

The main questions, comments and responses from the Stakeholder Workshop held at Dembia Woreda Administration in February 2010:

CONCERNS OF THE PAPS RESPONSES

Stakeholder issues and comments:

the involvement of women and youth in the Project

the fate of communal lands, especially grazing and forest lands, during the implementation of the Project

how the Project will handle burial sites in case they are affected by the Project

the role of PAPs in the valuation of properties

the number of Kebeles affected by the Project

the size and number of the water storage facilities (the Woreda Administrator wanted to have access to the design of the Project)

that there should be capacity building of the Woreda

how to speed up the process of the property inventory and valuation

that the Project shall also take into consideration people who are engaged in non-farm activities in the Project area

that the Project shall consider commercial sex workers in the area

that most people welcome the implementation of the Project, and want to see the realisation of it

Women: the Project has an assigned (from client and consultant) a Gender Specialist.

Vulnerable groups: the issue is being addressed. The Project will make recommendations, based on the country’s legislation and the World Bank’s relevant Policy document; special assistance will be provided to vulnerable social groups.

The valuation process and determination of compensation: the Project will follow the country’s legal framework (e.g. in formally establishing the Woreda Property Valuation Committee), and the World Bank’s relevant Policy framework.

Properties on communal land: compensation shall be calculated accordingly; however, the compensation may not be given out directly to the farmers, who were using the land, but be used for common purpose.

Composition of the Property Valuation Committee: 6 members from the Woreda Administration, 2 members from the respective rural Kebeles and one valuation Specialist from the Consultant. The process of valuation: the affected land shall be measured in the presence of the affected landholder and other farmers who have adjacent land; an inventory of property on the land shall be made, registering said property, in the presence of all concerned, including the spouse where applicable; the measurement of the land and the inventory list of property shall be shown to the concerned farmer, who is required to sign on the document to prevent future complaints. The Project shall endeavour to make the process fair and transparent. There is no procedure under which the affected farmer can list and register the property him/herself and declare same to the Committee. The members of the Committee are there for the purpose of joint valuation.

Burial grounds or graveyards: the engineering design has taken maximum precaution not to affect such sacred places. If, however, during the construction stage such places will be affected, the design is flexible to be adjusted to not affect them.

Woreda capacity building: the issue is crucial. Up until now concrete measures have been taken to build the capacity of the Woreda, such as providing vehicles and motorcycles. There are sufficient funds allocated for capacity building purposes. However, allocation has to be based on study, and occur in a more integrated way.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 32

TABLE 7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AT SERABA KEBELE, 11 AND 12 FEBRUARY 2010

Comments, Questions and Concerns Reactions Made/Measures to be Taken

With the implementation of the planned Project, our young children would not go somewhere else to look for jobs, as they do now, but they will be able to employ themselves as part of the Project.

The Project will bring to the community two types of advantages/benefits: temporary job opportunities and having permanent irrigable land. The Project will allow you to produce crops two or more times a year. This helps the community to improve living standards.

We heard about the Project a long time ago. Our children are migrating to other places to generate income. If the Project is realised as planned, our children will join us and create jobs and income for themselves. We therefore urge the immediate commencement of the Project.

During implementation, the Project needs labour. Please let the Project employ our children so that they can create income for themselves.

That is correct. The study of the Consultant will consider this aspect.

The realisation of the Project brings us all benefits. We want to see it in our lifetime.

The project is beneficial to us. We will pay tax to the government. We will change our living standard. We are pleased with the coming of the Project. Please accelerate the implementation of the Project.

The Project is good for us. I am pleased to hear this news in my area.

How is the compensation for our crops to be calculated?

The whole land acquisition, resettlement, compensation and rehabilitation content and process will be guided by the relevant policy document and laws of the federal government, the relevant laws and guidelines of the region, and including the World Bank’s resettlement policy framework.

Are we expected to pay some water charges to the government?

There is no water charge to be paid as such. There will, however, be some contribution made by all beneficiaries to irrigation water, to be determined by your future WUAs, to cover only the cost of operation and maintenance; this contribution will help sustain the Project and therewith your economic benefits from the Project.

If the Project provides us water for the whole year, it is good. We are expected to farm all the year round and get more benefits.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 33

We heard about the Project a long time ago. If it affects our houses, where should we locate our new houses? Is there a new area that has been arranged for us?

The relocation will, as far as possible, be within the same Kebele. The details shall be looked into during the determination of relocation sites. You will also be part of such process to determine the option and framework for planned relocation.

How is the irrigation going to be managed, both at Woreda and Kebele level? This issue is one of the Consultant’s assignments to look into, in the preparation of the RAP.

Comments, Questions and Concerns Reactions Made/Measures to be Taken

There is a shortage of land in our Kebele. The Project is also good for our youth. It is good to think and plan the redistribution of communal land to landless youth.

The resettlement will, as far as possible, be within the same Kebele. The details shall be looked into during the determination of the resettlement option and framework. You will be part of such process.

I am young. I am living with my parents. I am landless. Is there any plan to accommodate me i.e. to give land to me?

This question is beyond the Consultant’s terms of reference.

If the Project has planned to take our grazing land, where will our livestock graze? Is there anything in the Project plan?

As far as possible, replacement land for grazing shall be provided.

If our communal land is going to be affected by the Project, is there any plan to give us substitute communal land, or what is an alternative to this?

The issue and fate of communal land shall be decided by the specific communities, who are using such land. If they decide on its redistribution, such land shall become part of the land redistribution plan and process. The Project strictly follows a participatory approach. The community themselves decide what is beneficial for them. The government implements what has been agreed to or decided by the community.

There are some people in our area who are spreading unfounded false information about the Project. We should fight them jointly. They are our enemies. We do not want to continue in poverty. Poverty is enough.

The Project is planned to benefit the existing community. The land, after development i.e. after the construction of the necessary modern irrigation structures (canals and night reservoirs) will not be given to private investors but will be redistributed to community members as per the regional laws and guidelines. The whole community will be participating in the land redistribution process directly and indirectly.

We understood the difference between a private irrigation project and this government irrigation project. We have been assured that we will not be forced to relocate and resettle without first getting proper compensation. It assures us a lot. We are pleased.

The issue of compensation in terms of land shall be carried out based on the federal laws including the regional laws and guidelines. The affected will be measured. Properties/structures to be affected will be inspected and registered. Due compensation shall be assessed by the Property Valuation Committee. Compensation shall be paid to the eligible after the regional government

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 34

approves the extent of compensation. There are also other committees to be established, e.g. for land redistribution. In each phase of the process you will be consulted, and your concerns and views will be incorporated.

How about our churches, and graveyards, where our ancestors are laid to rest in peace forever? Does the Project impact these? These matters are sensitive to us. The Project should take care of them.

Churches and graveyards are not going to be affected. The design has avoided them.

We need the Project. There were rumors that the land is going to be taken and be transferred to some private investors. Today it has become abundantly clear that the land is not to be taken by the government and then given to private investors. The land after development becomes ours. What is expected from us is to develop the land and to improve our living standard. The Project has come for our development.

Comments, Questions and Concerns Reactions Made/Measures to be Taken

We accept and appreciate the Project. It is good. But will there not be an impact on the volume of water in Lake Tana, to be reduced due to the Project? How about thinking of constructing a dam on Megech and Dirma Rivers?

Comparing to the volume of the lake’s water, the volume of water to be used for the irrigation is minimal. There shall not be any significant impact on the Lake. The issue of dam on such rivers, if any, is not within the terms of reference of the Consultant.

How about the land to be taken for the construction of night reservoirs? Does it affect someone’s land?

There are 14 night reservoirs to be constructed within the Project Command Area. Yes it will affect some landholdings.

Regarding resettlement, we do not want to resettle too far from our farmlands. How is our land capable of being produced two or three time a year?

The resettlement option and framework shall be decided in close consultation with the Woreda administration, the community (especially the PAPs), the Kebele administration and other key stakeholders.

The area is so fertile. The Project needs land. The Project is planning to resettle us. Is that so? But where to resettle to?

The construction of the irrigation structures shall commence after all the resettlement, compensation and rehabilitation issues have been settled. It means that no construction activity shall begin without you first knowing where to settle, how much is to be compensated, and securing your financial benefit including the provision of immediate assistance if provided, like construction of your houses and so forth. You will also get annually, if you are affected, temporary compensation until you get your irrigation land and resume your livelihood.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 35

TABLE 8. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS WITH WOMEN: A SYNOPSIS OF RESULTS

03-05-10: PARTICIPANTS FROM DEBRE ZURIA (10) AND ARABIA (12) KEBELES, HELD IN GURAMBA KEBELE

IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT

NEGATIVE ISSUES RECOMMENDATIONS

Diseases e.g. STDs, HIV/AIDS – how will we be able to prevent STDs for young women involved/employed in the project and those living in the area?; there will be more problems with malaria, particularly for pregnant women, and cholera – how will the project assist?

HIV awareness campaign for the whole community, particularly youth e.g. means of transmission, prevention; conducted by Women’s Association, Women Affairs Office, health extension programme; PLWHA to give counselling; stop stigmatising, discrimination; parents to be aware of dangers of STDs and warn their children

Resettlement – where is land being given to those being resettled? Landholders will be given other land – what about women-headed households if they lose their land? What will happen to women who rent land and are displaced from the area?

Woreda is encouraging people displaced to take cash; unoccupied land within the project area is close to the land/ grazing area, so it will be crowded, so would rather have payment for the land; not comfortable with other sites; money has no value, so it is better to divide the land between the people (e.g. one farm between two)

Vulnerable households – some women will find it difficult to farm e.g. the elderly Community and government to assist e.g. help construct replacement structures; elderly people who cannot farm to get cash

Landless people will not benefit from the project Employed in construction; loan from project/government to support themselves (government money is insufficient); have women’s savings schemes; raise cattle (“we can’t do without animals”) through growing grass with irrigation

Currently transport crops once a year, in the dry season; how to transport crops twice a year, when there will be no dry season? With less transport women will die with difficult pregnancies

Why will only young men going to be employed for construction? Women to be employed in construction

The young have businesses in town (e.g. in containers); how will they benefit from the Project?

People may lose employment e.g. bar, restaurant, grinder, shop

POSITIVE ISSUES

Women will benefit as many people will get employment through irrigation; through irrigation will plant onions and potatoes; if displaced and get money, women will go to urban areas and start businesses; young women can be involved in construction, cultivating land, businesses and raising animals (there will be sufficient water)

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 36

Want to work with the project – there are no issues for women

Women have many problems – maybe life will become easier for them with the project

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 37

03-05-10: PARTICIPANTS FROM GURAMBA BATA KEBELE (10), HELD IN GURAMBA BATA KEBELE

IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT

NEGATIVE ISSUES RECOMMENDATIONS

No benefit as there will be no canal/irrigation in the area Women’s Associations will look at how they can benefit e.g. sell food, sell vegetables in the market, produced from irrigation, sell their labour

Loss of grazing land Communities not benefitting directly do not mind sharing grazing land

Health: STDs, particularly HIV/AIDS; other diseases may increase e.g. TB, kalazar (from flies), malaria, cholera, other water-borne diseases; will particularly affect vulnerable communities, commercial sex workers; no potable water in the area so people are becoming sick; no medical treatment when sick at night – only have clinic in Guramba i.e.– clinic and dressing during the day – at night, and if there is an accident, carry the person to hospitals (in Kola Diba, Gondar)

Boil water; distribute, use mosquito nets; test for HIV virus, as is happening now, so can take medication – test in Kola Diba, and if health professionals come into the area in mobile clinics (1 X 3 months); awareness campaigns e.g. +ve are encouraged to marry +ves

In rainy season the canals will flood, so there will be no accessible roads; heavy trucks a danger during construction

Women (Women’s Association) to advise children in the community (e.g. in schools) of the danger of trucks

There may be conflict between those in the Project area and neigbours; people in the command area may become dominant, and displace them/their housing

Women’s Associations can teach people in neighbouring communities how the project can benefit them

POSITIVE ISSUES

More food available

Use cash from land to develop a business in town

More available transport

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 38

04-05-10: PARTICIPANTS FROM JARJAR (14), ACHERA (10) AND SERABA DABLO (11) KEBELES, HELD IN GURAMBA BATA KEBELE

IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT

Affected structures (no churches affected); may lose grinders

Affected land; currently grow maize, barley, potatoes, cabbage, onions, teff; trees affected e.g. eucalyptus, medicinal; women currently raise cattle, so will be the greatest losers of grazing land

Increase in diseases, particularly HIV/AIDS

WOMEN’S ROLE IN SOCIETY

Agricultural skills e.g. digging/hoeing the land, weeding, sometimes planting seed; landless assist with weeding cropped land; ploughs are too heavy for women to carry/handle; women are generally more involved in vegetable gardens

Raise cattle, shoats and chickens; get eggs, dairy

Make baskets, clothes (gabis), jewellery; do hairdressing

Prepare food in shops

WOMEN’S CONTRIBUTION TO PROJECT

RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNS SOLUTIONS

Sell vegetable products at market (e.g. from Achera); want a business selling cash crops e.g. teff, corn, vegetables; share with owners of generators to irrigate; use water for own vegetable gardens

Have no money to start a business; WFP?; culturally women don’t do the same agricultural work as men

Women to be involved in agriculture; capable of doing what men do; the landless have been promised land for agriculture;

Produce cotton: make gabis; in Jarjar, make traditional baskets/clothes, jewellery for sale

Convert crops to food; open shops, bars, restaurants The construction will help with road development; develop shops, cafes and restaurants on the road; improved transport, to use to carry goods for shops etc.

Provide transport to/from town Women’s Associations have savings accounts (Birr 2 per week) for businesses e.g. for bars, donkey transport

Employment in construction of canals

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 39

07-05-10: PARTICIPANTS FROM MESKEL KIRISTOS (8), CHENKER (8) AND ABERJEHA (8) KEBELES, HELD IN MESKEL KIRISTOS KEBELE

FACTS ABOUT LOCAL SOCIETY

Diseases: bilharzias, jardia, malaria, cholera, intestinal parasites, HIV/AIDS, TB

Use wood for fuel, building houses, making furniture, fruit (mangos, wanza), medicine (white eucalyptus); plants used for spices, medicine, food; grass is used for thatching, fuel, basket-making, rope-making

Women’s businesses: bars, restaurants, making bread, weaving cotton, designing dress patterns/embroidery, making jewellery, hair dressing

PROJECT IMPACTS

NEGATIVE ISSUES RECOMMENDATIONS

Women won’t be able to go far from their homes during construction as they may get attacked/raped by workers

To report to kebele; police, army will follow up with victims; Women’s Affairs Office gives assistance, and will also follow up; there is prevention through prosecution of the perpetrator

Culturally women are not allowed to harvest, plough; women and men are not equal in agriculture

Gender equality; women will be able to harvest, plough for the project; in the past men did the farming, but now there is equality; cultural impact of women working/farming with husbands is traditionally not accepted – depends on the area, and men’s level of ‘awareness’; need to educate men/women – an expert in the Women’s Affairs Office trains the community around this; Women’s Associations can be involved

Weak women in the area (elderly, sick) can’t use their land; what will happen to them?

Money for land

If women’s houses are affected, what will happen to them? Where will they be resettled?

Will be given land and money for the house; land will be within the project area, on new land, or they will resettle on land from before they were relocated; money will be given for property within the house if it is lost; women will be paid for their structure and given land; don’t know about land replacement for resettlement – it will be discussed within the kebele; want to settle outside the project area, but near to the land/project so can prepare food and sell to neighbours; want businesses; is there an option of the government/project rebuilding houses?

Want to prepare food for the project, but don’t have enough funds

Women’s Association will select women for this purpose (3-5 women at each restaurant) (268 women in the association in Mikele Keristos); will ask the kebele to provide land for restaurants; ask the government to provide a loan to supply food etc.

HIV/AIDS Everyone is aware of the disease; prevention through no sex, one partner, use of condoms (community and workers); if

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 40

construction workers were infected, they would not be able to build the canals

Early marriages, leading to fistula (not directly a project issue)

POSITIVE ISSUES

The project will help to develop power of women through agricultural production

Women’s morale is now low, but will increase with income from the project – improve their lives through agricultural production (crops, vegetables)

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 41

The international legal and policy framework in which projects operate, and implementation procedures and guidelines, have developed substantially since adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. Instruments supported by member states include those developed by the United Nations (UN) and the European Union/Commission. Others have been developed by particular bodies, such as the World Bank, the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Guidelines and procedures for a public consultation and disclosure process have, however, been formulated by various international development and funding agencies that may be relevant to the Project, and need to be considered if international standards and practice are to be followed. These include:

the World Bank;

the African Development Bank (AfDB); and

the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

The World Bank

The World Bank has a number of policy, guideline and operations handbook items that address various aspects of public consultation/participation and public disclosure. Of particular relevance is the Bank’s Involuntary Resettlement Sourcebook, which dedicates a chapter (Chapter 7) to Consultation and Participation.1 Public consultation and disclosure processes to be followed are specified in all Operational Policies (OPs) relevant to environmental/social issues. For example, in OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment it states on Public Consultation that for proposed Category A projects2 it is required that during the EA process the Borrower “consults project-affected groups and local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) about the project’s environmental aspects and takes their views into account. The Borrower initiates such consultations as early as possible. For Category A projects, the Borrower consults these groups at least twice: (a) shortly after environmental screening and before the terms of reference for the EA are finalised; and (b) once a draft EA report is prepared. In addition, the Borrower consults with such groups throughout project implementation as necessary to address EA-related issues that affect them”3. On disclosure: “For meaningful consultations between the Borrower and project-affected groups and local NGOs on all Category A projects …., the Borrower provides relevant material in a timely manner prior to consultation and in a form and language that are understandable and accessible to the groups being consulted”. “For a Category A project, the Borrower provides for the initial consultation a summary of the proposed project’s objectives, description, and potential impacts; for consultation after the draft EA report is prepared, the Borrower provides a summary of the EA’s conclusions. In addition, the Borrower makes the draft EA report available at a public place accessible to project-affected groups and local NGOs”4. The EA report will keep a record of interagency and consultation meetings, including consultations for obtaining the informed views of affected people and NGOs. The record will specify any means other than consultations (e.g. surveys) that were used to obtain such views. Public availability in the borrowing country and official receipt by the Bank of Category A reports for proposed projects are prerequisites to Bank appraisal of these projects. Bank policy requires all documents associated with environmental and social policies to be made available through the Bank for public comment, after the country concerned has given its consent for the release to the proposed disclosure and after the document has been officially accepted by the bank. Thus once the Borrower has officially transmitted the Category A EA report to the Bank, the Bank makes the report available through its InfoShop.5

1 World Bank. 2004. Op cit. 2 As classified by the World Bank: a proposed project is classified as Category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental/social impacts that are sensitive, diverse or unprecedented. This Project would be classified as a Category A project. 3 www.worldbank.org 4 www.worldbank.org 5 The InfoShop is the World Bank’s public information and reference centre located in Washington, D.C, United States of America. It is a one-stop shop for economic development literature and for information on World Bank project activities. It offers various facilities ranging

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 42

Of particular relevance to this Project is the Bank’s OP 4.12: Involuntary Resettlement, which requires consultation of project-affected people, host communities and local NGOs, as appropriate. Opportunities to participate in the planning, implementation, and monitoring of the resettlement programme must be provided, “especially in the process of developing and implementing the procedures for determining eligibility for compensation benefits and development assistance (as documented in a resettlement plan), and for establishing appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms”6. Particular attention must be paid to the needs of vulnerable groups among those displaced, “especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, Indigenous Peoples, ethnic minorities, or other displaced persons who may not be protected through national land compensation legislation”7.

World Bank OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement: A Summary

Operational policy (OP) 4.12 states, as a policy objective, that “displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs” (paragraph 2b).

The OP further requires that the resettlement plan include measures to ensure that “the displaced persons are . . . consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically feasible resettlement alternatives” (paragraph 6[a]).

The OP provides the additional guidance that “displaced persons and their communities, and any host communities receiving them, are provided timely and relevant information, consulted on resettlement options, and offered opportunities to participate in planning, implementing, and monitoring resettlement. Appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms are established for these groups” (paragraph 13[a]).

OP 4.12 provides a detailed outline of the elements of a participation plan:

“Involvement of resettlers and host communities, including:

(a) a description of the strategy for consultation with and participation of resettlers and hosts in the design and implementation of the resettlement activities;

(b) a summary of the views expressed and how these views were taken into account in preparing the resettlement plan;

(c) a review of the resettlement alternatives presented and the choices made by displaced persons regarding options available to them, including choices related to forms of compensation and resettlement assistance, to relocating as individuals, families, or as parts of pre-existing communities or kinship groups, to sustaining existing patterns of group organization, and to retaining access to cultural property (e.g. places of worship, pilgrimage centres, cemeteries); and

(d) institutionalised arrangements by which displaced people can communicate their concerns to project authorities throughout planning and implementation, and measures are in place to ensure that vulnerable groups are adequately represented (Annex A, paragraph 15)”.

Draft resettlement plans are to be disclosed, including documentation of the consultation process, in a timely manner, in an accessible place and in an understandable form and language.

Source: World Bank.2004. Involuntary Resettlement Sourcebook: Planning and Implementation in Development Projects.

In Good Practice statement GP 14.70: Involving NGOs in Bank-Supported Activities, the World Bank advises on how NGOs and other organisations of civil society are important actors in the development process; that they can make an important contribution towards ensuring that the views of local people are taken into account,

from free information in the form of reports and documents, products such as books and publications, to computer workstations allowing public access to the Bank’s web site and CD-ROMs. Requests to the InfoShop may also be submitted through the Internet or Bank missions. See www.worldbank.org 6 OP 4.00: Table of Operational Policies. www.worldbank.org 7 World Bank. 2007a. Op cit.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 43

promote community participation, extend the reach of the project to the poorest, and introduce ‘flexible and innovative’ approaches. The Bank therefore encourages Borrowers to consult with NGOs “and to involve them, as appropriate, in Bank-supported activities, including economic and sector work and all stages of project processing – identification, design, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation”.8 In a similar manner, the Bank encourages the inclusion of women in project design, appraising: (a) the local circumstances that may affect the different participation of females and males in the project; (b) the contribution that females and males could make to achieving the project’s objectives; (c) ways in which the project might be disadvantageous to one gender relative to the other; and (d) the project’s proposed mechanisms for monitoring the different impacts of the project on females and males.9

8 World Bank. 2000. GP 14.70: Involving NGOs in Bank-Supported Activities. 9 World Bank. 2003. BP 4.20: Gender and Development.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 44

CHECK LIST FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES

1. Educational institutions by Kebele

Elementary School

Junior Secondary School

High School

2. Health institutions by Kebele

Health post

Clinic

Health centre

3. Water points by Kebele

Hand dug well

Dip well

Spring

4. Roads by Kebele

All-weather

Seasonal

5. Social services and institutions

Church

Mosque

Kebele Administration Office

Co-operative

Market Union

Market place

Community forest

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 45

SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Government of Ethiopia

Ministry of Water and Energy

Megech and Ribb Irrigation

Socio-Economic Study (2010)

Household Questionnaire

Project Site: Ribb Reservoir site Questionnaire No. ____________

GIS coordinates: X______________ Y________________

Interview: Day __________ Month ___________ Year __________

1. Household Identification

1.

Region

_________________________________

2. Zone

________________________________

3. Woreda

_________________________________

4. Peasant Association

_________________________________

5. Gott / Mender(s)

_________________________________

6. Respondent’s Name

_________________________________

7. Name of Head of Household (HH)

_________________________________

8. Respondent’s gender: 1. Male 2. Female

9.

PAP Identification Number (PAP-IN)

Name of interviewer ______________

Name of Supervisor_______________

_________________________________

Signature___________________

Signature____________________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 46

2. Households Demographic Characteristics

No. Family members Relationship to house-hold head

(HH)

Age Gender 1.Male

2.Female

Marital Status

Ethnic Group

Religion Education Level (> 7 years age)

Occupation House-hold labor input

Physical limitation

Years of

resid-

ence

Primary Secondary Tertiary

Relation to HH Marital Status Ethnic group Religion Education level Occupation Household Labour Physical Condition 1. HH Head 1. Single 1. Amehara 1. Christian 1.illitrate 1. Crop production 8. Livestock 1. Agriculture 1. Able-bodied 2. Spouse 2. Married 2. Oromo 2. Muslim 2.Read and write 2. Learning/student 9. Poultry 2. Livestock 2. Disabled 3. Son 3. Divorced 3. Tigray 3. Other 3. Pre school 3. Weaving 10. Basket Making 3.Off-farm 3. Other 4. Daughter 4. Widowed 4. Other 4. Grade 1-4 4.Tannery 11. Spinning 4. Home maker 5. Relative 5. Separated 5.Grade 5-8 5.Carpenter/masonry 12. Petty Trading 5. Not active 6. Dependent 6.Grade 9-10 6.Black smith 13. Daily Labour 6. Other 7. Grade 11-12 7. Carpet making 14. Unemployed 8. Above Grade12 15. Other

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP August 2010 47

3. Livelihood

3.1. Agriculture /crops

3.1.1. Land tenure and Land use

3.1.1.1 Do you have your own farm land? 1) Yes 2) No ------- Skip to 3.1.1.3

3.1.1.2 If your answer is yes to question No. 3.1.1.1, indicate the size of land of your possession?

1) Total land possession ________________ha.

2) Land rented out to others______________ha.

3) Land rented from others_______________ha.

3.1. Cash lease__________________ ha.

3.2. Share cropping______________ ha.

3.3.Other arrangement(specify)___________, __________ha.

3.1.1.3 If your answer is no to question No. 3.1.1.1, indicate the size of land of your possession as informal user (not recognised by the Kebele)

1) Total land used ________________ha.

2) Former use of the land 1. Grazing 2. Forest 3. Other (specify)________.

3) Land rented out to others______________ha.

4) Land rented from others_______________ha.

4.1. Cash lease__________________ha.

4.2. Share cropping______________ha.

4.3.Other arrangement(specify)___________, __________ha.

3.1.1.4 Could you indicate the land use of your formal possession?

1.Rainfed ______________ha.

Rainfed land according to fertility:

1.1 Fertile land ___________________ ha

1.2 Moderately fertile_______________ ha

1.3 Poor Fertility __________________ ha

2.Irrigated______________ha.

Irrigated land according to fertility:

2.1 Fertile land ___________________ ha

2.2 Moderately fertile_______________ ha

2.3 Poor Fertility __________________ ha

3.Grazing______________ha.

4.Other(specify)_________, _________ha.

3.1.1.5 Could you indicate the land use of your informal possession?

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 48

1. Rainfed ______________ha.

Rainfed land according to fertility:

1.1 Fertile land ___________________ ha

1.2 Moderately fertile_______________ ha

1.3 Poor Fertility __________________ ha

2. Irrigated______________ha.

Irrigated land according to fertility:

2.1 Fertile land ___________________ ha

2.2 Moderately fertile_______________ ha

2.3 Poor Fertility __________________ ha

3. Grazing______________ha.

4. Other (specify)_________, _________ha.

3.1.1.6 If your answer to questions number 3.1.1.1 is “No”, how do you manage your livelihood?

(Multiple answers are possible.)

1) Share cropping 2) Land rent 3) Wage labour 4) Petty trade 5) Other (specify)___________

3.1.1.7 If your answer to questions number 3.1.1.1 is “Yes”, do you have land use certificate?1)Yes 2) No

3.1.1.8 Do you have land title deed? 1) Yes 2) No

3.1.1.9 If your answer to questions number 3.1.1.7 is “No”, what is your reason? 1) On process 2) no legal title

3) Other (Specify)______________

3.1.1.10 what is/are the land use of your holding? 1) Annual Crop 2) Perennial crop 3) forest 4) residential and working area 5) Backyard garden 6) Others (specify): _______________

3.1.1.11 What is your major type of farming for crop production? [Only one answer is expected.]

1) Rainfed 2) Traditional irrigation 3) Modern irrigation 4) both rainfed and irrigated 5) Other (specify) ______________________________________________

3.1.1.12. If you are cultivating under irrigation what is/are your water sources?

1) River(s) 2) Well(s) 3) Individual rain water storage 4) Collective rain water storage 5) Lake Tana 6) Other (specify) ____________. 3.1.1.13 What type of water application do you use?

1) Surface irrigation 2) Sub irrigation 3) Sprinkler irrigation 4) Micro-sprinkler 5) Drip irrigation: 6) Other (specify) _______________

3.1.1.14 Do you use supplementary irrigation for crop production? 1. Yes 2. No

3.1.1.15 What are the major crops you grow under supplementary irrigation? [Only one response]

1) Horticultural crops 2) Cereal crops 3) oil seeds 4) pulses 5) Perennials 6) other (specify): ________________ 3.1.1.16 What are the major crops you grow under rain fed condition?

1) Horticultural crops 2) Cereal crops 3) oil seeds 4) pulses 5) Perennials 6) other (specify): ________________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 49

3.1.1.17 What is/are your power sources to till the land?

1) Oxen 2) Cows 2) Horses 3) Donkey 4) Tractor 5) Own & family labour 6) Other (specify) _____

3.1.1.18 Do you own or have access to farm mechanization for different agricultural activities? 1) Yes 2) No

3.1.1.19 Do you hire labour for farm/agriculture activities?

1) Yes 2) No

3.1.1.20 What is your major labour source for your farm/agriculture?

1) Own and family labour 2) Hired labour 3) Both

3.1.1.21 Which farming method need hired labor?

1) Irrigation 2) Rainfed cropping

3.1.1.22 Which activities need hired labor more? [Only one answer is expected.]

1) Irrigation 2. Plowing 3. Cultivation 4. Weeding 5. Harvesting 6 other (specify)……

3.1.1.23. Which of the above activities are done by female hired labor?

1) Irrigation 2. Plowing 3. Cultivation 4. Weeding 5. Harvesting 6 other (specify)……

3.1.1.24. Why do you prefer female hired labor?

1. Better done by female 2. Cheaper 3. Others (specify)_____

3.1.1.25. How many holidays are there in a month in which you don’t work? _________________

3.1.1.26. If you use hired labour for your agricultural activities for how many days do you hire in a year._______

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 50

3.1.1_A Crop, vegetable and fruit production during last year

No. Crop

Cultivated land (ha)/

No. of trees

Production System:

1) Rainfed 2) Irrigation

3) Both

Use of inputs (1.Yes 2.No) Total

Production (quintals)

Yield in

(quintal/ha)

Fertilizer

Improved seed

herbicide and

pesticide

1 Cereals 100

Teff 100

Wheat 101

Barley 102

Maize 103

Sorghum 104

Millet 105

2 Pulse crops 200

Chickpea 201

Haricot beans 202

3 Oil crops 300

Sesame 301

Noug 302

Sunflower 303

4 Fruit and vegetables 400

Onion 401

Tomatoes 402

Carrot 403

Cabbage 404

Garlic 405

Potatoes 406

5 Perennial 500

Orange 501

Banana 502

Mango 503

Lemon 504

Coffee 505

Gesho 506

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 51

6 Forest trees 600

Gerar 601

Tid 602

Wanza 603

Eucalyptus 604

3.1.1_B Crop /Trees Sales (cash income)

No Output Quantity Sales (in Birr) Remark

1. Grains (in KG)

2. Pulses (in KG)

3. Oilseeds (in KG)

4. Spices and pepper (in KG)

5. Fruits (in KG)

6. Vegetables (in KG)

7. Handcrafts (Number)

8. Eucalyptus sold (Number)

9. Pines Sold (Number)

10. Other trees sold (Number)

11. Firewood (Shekim/Chinet)

12. Charcoal (Sack)

13. Others (Number) (Specify)

[Enumerator: Please check that quantity sold is expressed in units next to the output type.]

3.1.1.3_C Sources and use of labour during last year

No. Labour Source Labour Used during Last Year Type of

Payment 1.cash 2.crop 3.both

Labour used for: 1) Land preparation 2) Seeding 3) Weeding 4) Harvesting 5) Other

Gender of Participant: 1. Male 2. Female 3. Both

Number of worker(s) employed

Total number of days employed for all labourers

1 Own and family labour

2 Hired labour living with the family

3 Hired labour living outside the family

4 Exchanged

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 52

labour with Neighbourhoods

5 Other (specify)

3.1.1_D Perennial crops and other trees owned during last year

No. Type of Perennial Crop Number of Trees

1. Coffee (Young or <5)

Coffee (Mature or 6 to 15)

Coffee (Old or >16)

2. Orange (Young or <5)

Orange (Mature or 6 to 15)

Orange (Old or >16)

3. Banana (Young or <5)

Banana (Mature or 6 to 15)

Banana (Old or >16)

4. Lemon (Young or<5)

Lemon (Mature or 6 to 15)

Lemon (Old or >16)

5. Eucalyptus (Young or<5)

Eucalyptus (Mature or 6 to 15)

Eucalyptus (Old or >16)

6. Other (Young or <5)

Other (Mature or 6 to 15)

Other (Old or >16)

3.1.1.27. Have you practiced soil and water conservation measures in your farm? 1. Yes 2. No

3.1.1.28. If your answer is “No” to question number 3.1.1.27, what was the reason for not practicing?

1) No problem of soil and water conservation 2) Rodents living inside structures 3) Lack of incentive

4) Too Much Labor requirement 5) Lack of Land 6) Lack of Knowledge 7) Other (specify): _______

3.1.1_E Land improvement structures existing during last year

No. Types of Soil Conservation Measures Quantity (In Meter)

1. Vegetation Strip

2. Contour Plowing

3. Fallowing

4. Growing Tree

5. Soil Bund

6. Stone Bund

7. Cut Off Drain

8. Terracing

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 53

No. Types of Soil Conservation Measures Quantity (In Meter)

9. Diversion Ditches

10. Drainage Ditch

11. None

3.1.1.29 where do you get your agricultural input? [More than one answer is possible.] 1. Cooperative union 2. Private suppliers 3. Government 4) Others (specify): _______

3.1.1.30 Could you tell us about the amount of crop produced during last year as compared to the year before?

1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. The same as last year

3.1.1.31. If your answer is Increased / Decreased, by how much?

1. By 10 percent 2. By 15 percent 3. By 25 percent 4. By 50 percent

3.1.1.32. What was the reason for the decrease? 1. Rain amount and distribution below normal condition

2. Occurrence of Pest 3. Lack of labour 4. Others (specify) ______ 3.2 Agriculture / Livestock

3.2.1 Do you have livestock? 1) Yes 2) No --- Skip to 3.3.1 3.2.2 Is there any animal health service institution in your Kebele? 1) Yes 2) No ----Skip to 3.3.1

3.2.3 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 3.2.2, what type of animal service institution is found?

1) Animal Health post 2) Animal Health clinic 3) Others (specify) ___________

3.2.4 For how many times did you get veterinary services during last year? __________

3.2.5 What are the major types of veterinary Services provided in your area?

1. Cattle vaccination 2. Sheep and goat vaccination 3. Livestock treatment for external parasite

4. Livestock treatment for internal parasite 5. Artificial insemination 6. Castration

7. Others (specify) __________

3.2.6 What is the major source of water for livestock? 1) River 2) Traditional well 3) Pond

4) Spring 5) Lake 6) others (specify): _____

3.2.7 What are your cattle feed sources?

1. Communal Grazing Land 2. Private Grazing Land 3. Fallow Land 4. Swampy Areas 5. Road Side 6. Hilly and Sloppy Areas 7. Shrub/Bush Land 8. Crop residue 9. others (specify): _____________ 3.2.8 What are your Sheep and goat feed sources?

1. Communal Grazing Land 2. Private Grazing Land 3. Fallow Land 4. Swampy Areas 5. Road Side

6. Hilly and Sloppy Areas 7. Shrub/Bush Land 8. Crop residue 9. others (specify):

_____

3.2.9 What are your Equines feed sources? 1. Communal Grazing Land 2. Private Grazing Land 3. Fallow Land 4. Swampy Areas 5. Road Side 6. Hilly and Sloppy Areas 7. Shrub/Bush Land 8. Crop residue 9. others (specify): _____

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 54

3.2_A Livestock number owned by the family during last year

No. Livestock type

Number

1. Cattle

Oxen 101

Bulls 102

Cow 103

Heifer 104

Calf 105

2. Sheep 201

3. Goats 202

4. Equines

Horses 301

Donkeys 302

Mules 303

5. Poultry (mainly Chicken) 401

6. Beehives 501

7. Others 601

3.2_B Livestock sales

No. Livestock Number Sold Unit Price Total value Reason for Selling

1. Cattle

Oxen 101

Bulls 102

Cow 103

Heifer 104

Calf 105

2. Sheep 201

3. Goats 202

4. Equines

Horses 301

Donkeys 302

Mules 303

5. Poultry (mainly Chicken) 401

6. Beehives 501

7. Fish 701

8. Others 601

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 55

3.2_C Livestock product production and sales

Livestock and livestock Product Quantity Produced Quantity

Sold

Unit Price Total Sales

Value

8. Milk (Liter)

9. Butter (Kg)

10. Cheese(Ayib) (Kg)

11. Eggs (Number)

12. Hides (Number)

13. Skins (Number)

14. Honey (Kg)

15. Wax (Kg)

16. Dung (Kubat) (Number

3.2_D Livestock market location

Name of the markets in the area

Major market activity [One response only!] 1.Cattle market 2.Sheep&goat 3. Equines 4.Livestock product 5.grain 6.fruits and vegetables 7.consumer goods 8.all products

Market location

Number of

Market Days/wee

k

Within PA Walking Distance (in Hours)

Outside PA Walking Distance (in Hours)

Location and distance in Km.

Woreda

Zone or Region

1.

2.

3.

4.

[Enumerator: Please check consistency of responses.]

3.2_E Major constraints of agricultural production

Types of Problems 1. Yes 2. No

1. Animal Diseases

2. Feed Problem

3. Money or Credit facilities

4. Supply of improved seeds

5. Supply of fertilizer

6. Existence of road & markets

7. Shortage of Veterinary Services and Drugs

8. Lack of know-how and Extension

9. Shortage of Water

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 56

3.3 Non-farm activities and Migration

3.3.1 Are you a permanent resident in this area? 1) Yes 2) No -- Skip to -- 3.3.3

3.3.2 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 3.3.1, indicate for how long you have stayed here?

1. This year 2. Last year 3. Two years ago 4. 3 to 5 years 5. More than five years

3.3.3 What was the reason for your coming to this area? 1. Searching for employment 2. To see relatives 3. Parents are living in the same place 4. During land redistribution 5. Others(specify)_________

3.3.4 Do you have your own farmland? 1.Yes 2.No

3.3.5 What is the reason that you don’t have farm land? 1. I didn’t ask the Kebele 2. I don’t know farming 3. I don’t know how to get it 4. Land is not given to migrants 5. Other(specify)___________

3.3.6 Have you asked to get your own land? 1. Yes 2. No

3.3.7 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 3.3.6, then what was the response of the authorities?

1. No 2. Yes but wait 3. No response 4. Other (specify) ___________

3.3.8 If the response of the authorities is yes, but wait, how long have you waited? 1. Less than a year 2. One year 3. Two years 4. 3 to 5 years 5. More than five years

3.3.9 Do you have your own home? 1. Yes 2. No

3.3.10 If you don’t have your own residential house how do you manage to live? 1. Rental 2. With relatives 3. Dependent 4. Other(specify)___________

3.3.11 If you have your own residential house how did you manage to get the land?

1. Bought with the house 2. Gift from relatives/friends 3. Informal settlement 4.Other (specify)_____

3.3.12 What is your major occupation in the area? 1. Trader 2. Labourer 3. Handicraft 4. Weaving and cloth making 5.Construction worker 6. Agriculture 7. Other (specify)_______________

3.3.13 Is your major occupation providing you sufficient income to your family? 1. Yes 2. No

3.3.14 If “No” to 3.3.13, how do you manage to compensate the deficiency? 1. Work on secondary economic activity 2. Engaged in more than two activities 3. Other(specify)__________

3.3.15 What assets do you have in the project area? 1. Capital on trade 2. Shop 3. Working shade 4.livestock 5. Livestock shade 6. Residence 7. Others (specify)_________

3.3.16 What will be the damage that you face if you are told to leave out of this area? 1. Residential house 2. Damage on business premises 3. Animal shade 4. Machinery shade 5.livestock 6. Others(specify)_________

3.3.17 What are your requirements to resettle in a new area?

1. Capital for reconstruction 2. Land for working area 3. Land for residence 4. Land for farming

5. Acquire new Skill 6.Others (specify) ______________

3.3.18 If you have your own farmland, why do you prefer to involve in non farm activity?

1. Looking for better income 2. Old age 3. Disable 4. Widow 5. Others (specify) _________

3.3.19 What benefit/damage do you expect from the project?

1. Increase Income 2. Develop Market 3. Increase Production 4. Increase Knowledge 5. Increase employment opportunity 6. Increase productivity 7. Reduce Land 8. Displacement 9. Reduce Output 10. Nothing 11. Other 99. N/A

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 57

4. Social services

4.1 Health

4.1.1 Have you heard about HIV/AIDS epidemics in your area? 1) Yes 2) No 4.1.2 What preventive measures do you use against HIV/AIDS? 1) Prohibition 2) Limited to monogamous sex 3) Use of condom 4) All 5) Others (specify) ________ 4.1.3 Do you have malaria problem in your area? 1) Yes 2) No 4.1.4 What preventive measures do you use against malaria? 1) Mosquito net 2) Home chemical spray 3) Drain marshy places 4) Others (specify) _______ 4.1.5 How many mosquito nets do you have for the family? 1) Only one: 2) Two 3) Three: 4) More than three 4.1.6 Are the mosquito nets you have sufficient for the family? 1) Yes 2) No 4.1.7 Are there any health service/ facility in your kebele? 1) Yes 2) No 4.1.8 What kind of transport is available when you or one of your family members wants to go to the health

facilities? 1) Walking on foot 2) Use horse 3) Use vehicle 4) Carry by people 5). Others (specify): ____________ 4.1.9 What are the major diseases that prevailed in your family during the past year? 1. Malaria 2.Diarrhea (all types) 3.Intestinal Parasites 4.Skin Infections and Wounds 5.Rheumatic

6. Pain 7. Ear, Nose, Eyes and Throat Diseases 8.TB 9.HIV/AIDS 10) Others (specify) __________

4.1.10. If you go by foot when you travel to health facilities from your home, indicate the distance in km and walking in hours:

4.1_A Access to health services

NO.

Health Institution

Number

facilities/existing

Walking Distance from your home to

the nearby services (Hours)

Facilities Existing in the Woreda/nearby town and

distance from the PA

Facilities Existing in the Region and distance

from the PA

Within the PA

in the nearby

PA

Number

Distance in

Km.

Number

Distance in

Km.

1. Health Post

2. Health Center

3. Hospital

4. Private Clinic

5. Pharmacy/Drugstore

6. Other

Traditional Health Services

7. Community Health Worker

8. Religious Healer

9. Traditional Healer

10. Others

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 58

4.2 Water Supply

4.2.1 What is the main sources of drinking water for your family?

1) River: 2) Hand-dug well 3) None protected spring

4) Pond 5) Protected spring 6) Rain water

7) Deep well 8) Lake 9) Piped water

10) Other (specify) ___________

4.2.2 Is the water sources you use provide sufficient water for your family throughout the year?

1) Yes 2) No

4.2.3 If “No” to question number 4.2.2, how do you solve the problem?

1) By travelling far away to other safe source 2) by reducing the amount of water used

3) by using other unprotected water sources 4) Other (Specify) _________

4.2.4 Did you face any problem due to lack of clean water? 1) Yes 2) No

4.2.5 If “Yes” to 4.2.4, what kind of problem? 1) Health problem: 2) Sanitation problems 3) others (specify)

________________________

4.2.6 What kind of technical problem do you face related to water supply?

1) Quantity (Shortage) 2) Reliability (Frequency of supply)

3) Quality (Taste, Wet and Dry Seasons) 4) others (specify)_________

4.2.7 Could you tell us your daily water consumption quantity in your local unit (Ensera)? _____

4.2_A Source and location of water supply

No.

Main Source for Household Water

Supply

Walking Distance

(in hour)

Member of the family Who

collect the water

1. Female 2.Male 3. Both

1. Protected well or spring

2. Unprotected well or spring

3. River, Lake/Pond

4. Other (specify )

4.2.8. Do you use boiled water for drinking? 1) Yes 2) No

4.2.9. Which chemical do you use to clean water? 1) Chlorine 2) Wuhagar 3) other (specify) ____

4, 2.10.How frequent do you use chemicals?1) regularly 2) during health problem 3) other (specify)_____

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 59

4.3 Waste Disposal

4.3.1 Types and availability of waste disposal facilities 4.3.2 What is your reason for not having latrine?

1. Lack of capital 2.lack of labor to dig the pit 3. Lack of space in the compound 4. I don’t see the importance 5.

Others (specify) __________

4.3.3 Do you know that there is a strong relationship between sanitation and health problem?1)Yes 2) No

4.3.4 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.3.3, then could you mention some?

1. Respiratory disease 2. Infectious disease 3. Malaria 4. Water born diseases

5. Internal Parasite 6. Trachoma 7. Internal diseases 8. HIV/AIDS 9. Other 99. N/A

4.3.5 Do you wash your hands after using latrine? 1) Yes 2) No

4.3.6 Do you use soap to wash your hands after using latrine? 1) Yes 2) No

4.4 Education 4.4_A Availability of educational facility

No. Schools Availability in the (Number of facilities)

Within the PA

Outside the PA/Woreda

Within the PA

Outside the PA/ Woreda

One-Way Average Walking Distance from your home

(Hour)

One-Way Average Walking Distance from your home

(Hour)

1.

Pre School

2.

Lower Primary (1-4)

3.

Primary (5-8)

4.

Secondary (9-10)

5 Preparatory

5.

Technical School

4.4.1 Are there children who are not attending school? 1) Yes 2) No

4.4.2 What are reasons for not attending school? 1. Distance to school too long 2. No money for school

materials (books) 3. No money for school cloths (and food) 4. Child has to support the family in

agriculture and domestic works 5. Early Marriage (< 15 years) 6. Under School Age 7. Behavioral

problem 8. Change of Residence 9. Have no child 10. Others 99. N/A

No.

Human Waste Disposal

Types of waste disposal facilities 1.Yes 2.No

1. Flush toilet

2. Pit latrine

3. Fields

4. Corner of compound (open)

5. Other (Specify )

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 60

4.5 Credit services

4.5.1 Have you received any credit during last year? 1. Yes 2.No

4.5.2 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.5.1, what were the purposes of your borrowing?

1. Agriculture Input Purchase 2.Livestock Purchase 3.Household Consumption

4. Business Activities 5. Settle another Credit ("debt services) 6. Others (specify)_______

4.5.3 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.5.1, from where did you borrow the money?

1. Traditional Institutions (Ekub/Eder) 2. Friends/relatives neighbors 3. Local Money Lenders

4. Micro-Finance Institutions 5. Cooperatives 6. Others (specify) ____________

4.5.4 Are there traditional saving and credit institutions (iqub, idir, etc.) in your area?

1) Yes 2) No

4.5.5 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.5.4, what type are they?

1) Iqub: 2) Idir 3) Both: 4) Other (specify): ___________

4.5.6 Are you a member in the above local saving and credit institutions? 1) Yes: 2) No:

4.5.7 If “Yes” to question number 4.5.6, to which ones?

1) Iqub: 2) Idir 3) Both 4) Other (specify): ___________

4.5.8 Do you have access to any formal credit service providers (private or public banks) in your area?

1) Yes: 2) No

4.5.9 Are there any other micro-finance institutions that provide credit & saving services?

1) Yes 2) No

4.5.10 If your answer is yes to question number 4.5.9 have you taken any credit to meet your short/long term

finance needs? 1) Yes 2) No

4.5.11 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.5.10, for what purpose did you take the credit?

1) Fertilizer: 2) Improved seeds: 3) Animal fattening 4. Livestock purchase

5) Other (specify) ___________

4.5.12 If “Yes” to question number 4.5.10 how much did you borrow last year? Birr: _______

4.5.13 If “No” to question number 4.5.10, what were the major constraints that limited you to take the advantage?

1) Higher interest rate: 2) Lack of information on availability of credit:

3) Lack of collateral: 4) other (specify) _________________

4.5.14 If “No” to question number 4.5.10, how do you meet your agricultural finance/capital need?

1) Sale own assets: 2) Borrow from friends and relatives 3. Sale livestock

4) Borrow from local money holders 5) other (specify) ____________.

4.5.15 To whom do you supply your agricultural output (Indicate your major market links?)

1) Government owned enterprises: 2) Multipurpose Cooperative Society

3) Cooperative Union: 4) Middle men 5) Private Whole sellers 6) Retail sale 6) Others (specify)

4.6 Energy Supply

4.6.1. Have you faced fuel supply problem for domestic use during the last month? 1) Yes: 2) No:

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 61

4.6.2. If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.6.1, what were the reasons of the problem?

1. Insufficient resource/ decreasing 2. Bad Quality 3. Distance (Far away) 4. No Transport

5. Few Family Members to collect 6. Costs (Expensive) 7. Others (specify) _____________

4.6_A Family energy requirement

No.

Item

Use of Energy (Quantity/month)

1.Eser 2.chinet 3.shekim 4.liter 5. quintal

coo

kin

g

Lig

hti

ng

Hea

tin

g

Ho

use

Un

it

qu

anti

ty

Un

it

qu

anti

ty

Un

it

qu

anti

ty

1. Firewood

2. Charcoal

3. Crop Residues

4. Animal Dung

5. Candles

6. Kerosene

7. Generator

8. Gasoil

9. Electricity

4.6_B Family energy sources

No. Source

Kerosene 1.Yes 2.No

Wood 1.Yes 2.No

Charcoal 1.Yes 2.No

Animal dung 1.Yes 2.No

Crop residue

1.Yes 2.No

1. Own "plot of wood/forest"

2. Own Farms

3. Leftover in Land Preparation

4. Natural Forest

5. Natural Shrub/Grazing land

6. PA (Kebele) Plantation

7. Surrounding farms

8. Market

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 62

4.6.3 Do you have access to electric power supplies? 1) Yes 2) No

4.6.4 If your answer is “No” to question number 4.6.3, what are your alternative sources of energy for household

consumption?

1) Wood 2) Crop residues 3) Animal dung 4) All three

5) Others (specify)

4.6.5 Do you plant trees? 1) Yes 2) No

4.6.6 If your answer is “No” to question number 4.6.5, where do you get wood for domestic consumption?

1) Natural forest 2) Buy from fire wood collectors 3) others (specify):

4.7 Transport and communication 4.7.1 How many times do you travel out of your area in a week? _______

4.7.2 Do you have any way of transportation of your own? 1. Yes 2. No

4.7.3 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.7.2, which of the following way(s) do you use to transport

agricultural products to market places?

1. Farm handcart 2. Animal driven carts 3.carry by your self

4. Pack animals 5) Motor vehicles 6) others (specify): ________

4.7.4 Which of the following pack animals do you use for transport?

1. Camels 2. Donkeys 3. Horse 4. others(specify): _______

4.7.5 Do you have market information access/communication such as telephone, Radio…etc?

1. Yes 2. No

4.7.6 If your answer is “Yes” question number 4.7.5, indicate the market information communication means

you have (multiple answer is possible).

1 . Telephone 2. Mobile 3. Periodically posted price lists 4. Postal 5. Internet 6. Radio

7. from neighbourhood and friends 8. None 9. Others(specify): _______

4.7.7 Is there any road access in your community throughout the year? 1. Yes 2. No

4.7.8 If your answer is “Yes” question number 4.7.7, to which place are you connected? 1. To other PA

2. Woreda town 3. Zonal town 4. Regional town 5. The near by market 6. Others (specify)_____

4.8 Housing, livestock shade and storage facility

4.8.1 Do you have your own residential house? 1) Yes 2) No

4.8.2 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.8.1, then when was it constructed? ______ Years ago.

4.8.3 Could you tell us the area of your house? __________m2

4.8.4 Could you tell us the number of rooms of your house? _________

4.8.5 Could you tell us the type of material used for the construction of the roof of your house? 1. Grass 2.

Corrugated iron sheet 3. Others (specify) _________________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 63

4.8.6 Could you tell us the type of materials used for the construction of the floor of your house? 1. Mud 2. Stone

3. Cement screed 4. Bamboo splits 5. Others (specify) ______________

4.8.7 Could you tell us the type of materials used for the construction of the wall of your house? 1. Wood and

mud 2. Wood only 3. Bamboo and mud 4. Adobe 5. Hollow blocks 6. Others (specify) ____________

4.8.8 Do you have livestock shade? 1) Yes 2) No

4.8.9 If your answer is “Yes” question number 4.8.1, then could you tell us the area your livestock shade?

__________m2

4.8.10 Is the livestock shade a separate unit from the residence? 1) Yes 2) No

4.8.11 Could you tell us the type of material used for the construction of the roof of the livestock shade?

1. Grass 2. Corrugated iron sheet 3. Others (specify) _________________

4.8.12 Could you tell us the type of materials used for the construction of the wall of the livestock shade?

1. Wood and mud 2. Wood only 3. Bamboo and mud 4. Adobe 5. Hollow blocks

6. Others (specify) ____________

4.8.13 Do you have grain storage? 1) Yes 2) No

4.8.14 If your answer is “Yes” to question number 4.8.13, what type of storage do you have? 1) Modern 2)

Traditional 3) Both

4.8.15 What is the capacity of your storage? ______Quintal

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 64

0 05. Household income and expenditure

05.1. Household income and source

No. Income Source Annual Amount (in Birr)

Agriculture (Crops and Livestock)

1. Crops (Grain and Vegetable) produced (Produce x Price)

2. Crops (Grain and Vegetable) received from others (Produce x Price)

3. Perennial Crops both sold and used at home (Produce x Price)

4. Live Animals sold/consumed at home

5. Animal Products / By-Products( both consumed at home & sold)

6. Forest trees/ Products (including firewood, charcoal) sold and used

7. Land Rent/Lease Out

8. Petty Trading (income from trade)

9. Other income (specify)

Off-farm Activities

10. Governmental Permanent Employment of family members(salary)

11. Private/ Industry Permanent Employment of family members(salary)

12.

Hired / Daily Labor of family members(payments)

13. Handicraft / Trade of family members(income from trade)

Other Sources

14.

Financial support by family members (son, father, others)

15.

Financial support by relatives (brother, uncle, others)

16.

Neighbor's, charity

17.

Pension

18.

Remittance

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 65

05.2. HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE

Areas Item Annual Amount (in Birr)

Personal Requirements Consumables (Grains consumed x market price)

Other consumables (salt, sugar, oil, etc.)

Medical Care

Education

Clothing

House Maintenance/Building

Energy

Water

Transport

Agriculture and Livestock Farm Tools (incl. pumping)

Farm Inputs (Fertilizer/Pesticide/Seed, etc.)

Hiring Labor

Land Rented

Livestock feed

Animal Health

Buying Animals

Grains given to others as payment

Financial Matters Taxes/Payments(-)

Debt Repayment(-)

Savings(+)

Cultural events Social / Religious Ceremonies

Others

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 66

6. Water users organisations (WUOs)

6.1 Do water user’s organizations exist in your kebele?

1. Yes 2. No

6.2. If “Yes” to 6.1, indicate the number of water users’ organizations in your kebele: _____

6.3 If your answer to question number 6.1 is “Yes”, are you a member of water user’s organization(s)?

1. Yes 2. No

6.4 If you are a member of any water user’s organization, are you one of the elected members?

1. Yes 2. No

6.5. If your answer to question number 6.4 is “Yes”, indicate your function/position:

1) Chairperson 2) Secretary and accountant 3) Cashier and property control 4) Maintenance

committee 5) Audit and control 6) Other (specify) ______________

6.6. Do you know the elected members of your WUOs?

1. Yes 2. No

6.7 Do you know the program of the meetings of your WUOs? 1) Yes 2) No

6.8 If your answer to question number 6.7 is “Yes”, how many times the General Assembly meet in a year?

_____

6.9 How many times do the elected members meet in a year? _____

6.10. Are you a member of a WUO? 1. Yes 2. No

6.11 Do you participate in the General Assemblies of your WUOs? 1) Yes 2) No

6.12 If your answer to question no (6.10) is yes, indicate the frequency of your attendance:

1) Always 2) Sometimes 3) Rarely 4) Not at all

6.13 If your answer to question number 6.10 is “No”, explain your reasons:

1) No use to meet: 2) I don’t have time: 3) Others (specify): _______________

6.14 What is your contribution to the WUOs?

1) Labour 2) Water users fee 3) Contribute material 4.Other (specify) __________

6.15 If you contribute to the WUOs, how much is your contribution per year in Birr? _______

6.16 How is/are your WUO(s) functioning? 1) Very well 2) Well

3) adequately 4) Badly 5) Very badly

6.17 Explain your reasons for each:-

1) Very well: ________________________________

2) Well: ____________________________________

3) Adequately: _______________________________

4) Badly: ___________________________________

5) Very badly: _______________________________

6.18 What are your reasons for poor management of the WUO? (Multiple answers are possible.)

1. Lack of fair distribution of water 2. Lack of adequate irrigation/drinking water for all farmers/ families 3.

Poor management system 4. Lack of skill of members 5. Other (specify): ____________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 67

7. Community Attitude on the Proposed Irrigation Scheme

7.1 Have you heard of the proposed irrigation development? 1. Yes 2. No

7.2 If “Yes” to 7.1., are you willing to cooperate for development of the proposed irrigation project?

1. Yes 2. No

7.3 If “Yes” to 7.1, are you willing for resettlement due to land acquisition in case if needed?

1. Yes 2. No

7.4 If it is necessary due to the irrigation development, are you willing to merge your plots with others?

1. Yes 2. No

7.5. If “Yes” to 7.3., where do you like to resettle? 1. Within the same Woreda of the reservoir 2. Within the irrigation scheme command area of Dembia Woreda 3. Within the irrigation scheme command area of Dembia Woreda 4) others (specify): ____________ 7.6. If no to (7.3.), what would be your option to rehabilitate your livelihood other than resettlement either in your area or elsewhere? ________________________________________ 7.7 By using the new irrigation system, what types of crop(s) do you like to produce and for what purposes?

Rank your priorities.

Crop Type Priority Ranking for Production

(1st, 2nd, 3rd 4th)

Purposes of Producing: 1) Family food 2) Market 3) Both

Cereals

Pulses

Oil seeds

Vegetables

Fruits

Perennial crops

Industrial crops (cotton, sisals etc.)

Other (specify)

7.8 If you are outside the project area, what benefits do you get from the project?

1. Nothing 2. Irrigated land 3. Employment 4. Others (specify) ________________

7.9 If you are outside the project area, what negative effect do you expect from the project?

1. Reduced grazing land 2. Reduced forest land 3. Reduced crop land 4.share residential land

5.Other (specify)_______

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 68

8. Issues Related to Social Organisations

8.1 In which of the following Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) and Cooperative Societies you are a member? (More than one answer is possible) 1) Idir: 2) Ikub: 3) Cooperative Society 4) Informal labour exchange groups (wonfel, debo, jigi, etc) 5) others (specify): ___________________

8.2 If you are a member of a Cooperative Society organized in your area, indicate the type of organization? 1) Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperative society 2) Water Users Association 3) Savings and Credit Association 4) other (specify)____________________

8.3 If you are not a member of any of the above stated social organizations what are your reasons?

1) CBOs and Cooperative Societies are not established 2) I do not like to join them 3) unable to fulfil financial obligations 4) Other (specify):

8.4 Do you know any NGO operating in your area? 1) Yes 2) No

8.5 If your answer is yes to question no. 8.4., what is the major function of the NGO?_____

8.6 Do you prefer these NGOs as alternative institutions to implement the resettlement activity? 1) Yes 2) No

8.7 Where do you prefer to resettle?

1. In your current residential area only 2. Outside the project area 3. Any where 4.others (specify) _______

8.8 If your preference is to settle any where, then what was your reason?

1. You have another land outside the project area 2.you have relatives outside the project area

3. You can buy house in the nearby town 4.others (specify)_____________

8.9 What are the major problems of the project area?

1. Road 2. Market Place 3.Maleria 4.water supply 5. Others (specify) _______________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 69

CENSUS AND INVENTORY FORM

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office

Megech (Seraba) Irrigation Project Demographic and Property Inventory Format

Interviewer: ______________________________________________ Interview: Day __________ Month ___________ Year __________

01 IDENTIFICATION: Project Affected Household (Persons)

No.

Item Content

1. Region

_________________________________

2. Zone

_________________________________

3. Woreda

_________________________________

4. Peasant Association

_________________________________

5. Sub Kebele

_________________________________

6

Gott /Mender(s) Specific Location ()

_________________________________

6.1 Pump

6.2 Bridge

6.3 Canal

6.4 Access Road

6.5 Others(Specify)

7. Respondent’s Name

_________________________________

8. Name of Head of Household (HH)

_________________________________

9. PAP Identification Number (PAP-IN) _________________________________

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 70

No. Name of family members Relati-onship to the HH

Age Gender 1. Male 2. Female

Marital Status

Ethnic Group

Religion Education Level (> 7 years age)

Occupation Level of disability

Years of residence

Primary Secondary

Relation to HH Marital Status Ethnic group Religion Education Level Occupation Disability

1.HH 1. Single 1. Amehara 1. Christian 1. Illitrate 1. Unemployed 9. Basket making 1. Physical

2. Spouse 2. Married 2. Oromo 2. Muslim 2. Read and write 2. Agriculture 10. Spinning 2. Mental

3. Son 3. Divorced 3. Tigray 3. Other 3. Preschool 3. Weaving 11. Petty Trading 3. None

4. Daughter 4. Widowed 4. Other 4. Grade 1-4 4. Tanning 12. Daily Labour

5. Relative 5. Separated 5. Grade 5-8 5. Carpenter 13.Other

6. Dependent 6. Grade 9-10 6. Blacksmith

7. Grade 11-12 7. Carpet making

8. Above Grade12 8. Poultry

02. Households Demographic Characteristics

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 71

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office Date of interview ____________________ Name of land holder ____________________

03. Land Use Pattern of the Total Private Landholdings and Affected Land Areas (Ha) by the Project

No. Holding certificate and farm

identification no.

JPS Reading Neighbour (boundary) Total Landholding in Ha Land Use

1. Irrigation 2. Rainfed

Remark Signature of Land Holder Easting Northing East West North South Total

land holding

Total Size of Affected

land

Land use: Farm land, grazing land, irrigated land, trees/forest and residential area Land use certificate number ……………………………..

Reason for not having certificate ……………………

How many times do you harvest irrigation crops in a year ……………………

Name and signature of Property Valuation Committee

Name

Signature

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 72

Protection, Land Administration and Use Office

04. FIXED ASSET - Land: Type of "Private Land Holdings": Total and Affected Areas (ha)

Quantity of Land Available and Affected (in ha)

No Total Area of Land

Rented From Others

Rented To Others Government Land or Other Informal User

Right

Obtained From Others Shared with Others

Current

To be Affecte

d

Current To be Affecte

d

Current To be Affecte

d

Current To be Affected

Current

To be Affected Current To be Affected

1.

2.

3.

4.

05. Major Crops Grown and Crop Rotation Practiced in the Project Area

No. Major type of crop

Irrigation Rainfed 2008/2009

2007/2008

2006/2007

2005/2006

2004/2005

1

2

3

4

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 73

5

6

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office

Date of interview ____________________ Name of the owner of perennial crops ____________________

06. Type and Number of Perennial Crops Affected Due to the Project

No. Type of perennial crops

Number of ripe perennial crops

Age of growth Number of unripe perennial crops Remark Signature of owner Big Medium Small Seedling

Name and signature of Property Valuation Committee

Name

Signature

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 74

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office Date of interview ____________________ Name of the owner ____________________

07: Type and Number of Natural and Planted Trees Affected by the Project

Filite: the trees will be cut into a number of pieces (similar) and used for construction wall of houses and firewood

Name and signature of Property Valuation Committee

Name

Signature

N

o

Type of tree Very Big

(used for

firewood)

Age (level) of growth of trees

used for”Filite”(higher)

“Kebleta“ Age (level) of growth of the trees Signature

of the

owner

“Wereaje”

“Kuame” “Mager” used for

roof

“Mager” used for

Wall

“Chefeka” Seedling (“Chegn”)

Gutoo

Big Medium Small

Eucalyptus

Other trees

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 75

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office Date of interview ____________________ Name of the owner of the houses____________________

08. Residential Houses and Other Structure Affected by the Project

No. Building and other structures

Dimension Area in M2

Floor area M2

Material used for Construction No. Rooms

Level of House

Signature of owner

Length in (m)

Width in (m)

Radius in (m)

Wall 1.Wood only 2.Wood + mud 3.Masonery 4.Block 5.Brick 6.Other (specify)

Roof 1.Grass, 2.Corrugated iron 3. Other (specify)

Floor 1.Mud 2.Cement 3.Other (specify)

Door 1.Metal 2.Wood 3.Other

Window 1.Metal 2.Wood 3.Other

Residential Houses

Kitchen

Toilet Room

Shop

Others

Name and signature of Property Valuation Committee

Name

Signature

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 76

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office

Date of interview ____________________ Name of the owner of the houses____________________

09.Other Structures

Type of construction Type of construction

Number Materials used for construction

Unit Of measurement

Area Signature owner of the property

Fences

Terracing

Porch

Animal Shed

Water Harvesting

Water well

Beehives Traditional

Modern

Grain Store

Grain Mills

Other (Specify)

Name and signature of Property Valuation Committee

Name

Signature

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 77

Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Office

Date of interview ____________________ Name of the owner of the houses____________________

10. Business

Businesses number

Name of business

owner

Age of business

owner

Type of activity

No. of employees

Monthly income average

Destination of production

Place of selling

Duration of existence

of the business in affected

location

Comments

Name and signature of Property Valuation Committee

Name

Signature

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 78

19. Perception about the project

19.1. What benefit do you expect from the project?

…………………………………………………………………………………………

19.2. Potential negative impact of the project

……………………………………………………………………………………………

20. Compensation and Resettlement

20.1 Are you willing to give up your land against an appropriate compensation (land to land compensation) for the construction of canal and other structure? Yes ……………… No……….

20.2. Are you willing to give up your house against an appropriate compensation for the construction of houses? Yes………….. No……………...

20.3. Do you have a preference of location for the construction of houses? Yes……… No……… If the answer is yes mention the name and location of the places …………………………………………………………………………………………… Distance of the places from your houses in one way walking (in minutes)……………………………………. 21. Communal properties affected by the project

Do you fear loss of communal properties (grazing land, water points school፣ self help association and others)?

Yes No

No Name of affected communal properties Measure needed to be taken

1

2

Name and Signatures of the PAP (Project Affected Person) and Committee

Name of affected persons Signatures of the affected persons

1. 2.

Name of Property Valuation Committee Representatives

Signatures

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Name of the worker of Consultant Signatures

1. 2.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 79

TABLE 9. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT ACCORDING TO KEBELE

No. NAME OF PAP Length (m)

Width

(m)

Radius (m)

AREA (m2)

WALL ROOF FLOO

R DOOR

WINDOW

SERABA DABLO

1 Abeyu Ewentu Hailu

4.5 6.2 27.9 Wood and mud

Corrugated Iron Sheets (CIS)

Mud CIS

2 Yeredawe Ewentu Hailu

2.6 21.2

4 Wood and ageda

CIS Mud Wood

3 Fetene Aragy 6.2 6.1 37.8

2 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

4 Desetawe Getachwe Birhune

7.3 5.7 41.6

1 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

5 Getachwe Birehun Tesma

7.7 6.2 47.7

4 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS and wood

6 Semgne Dego Chekole

6.1 6.3 38.4

3 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

7 Dereje Belaye Felke

7.2 6.3 45.3

6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud Lamrea Lamrea

8 Atala Zelke Mech (w/ro)

1.2 4.52 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

9 Abu Arage Ayelgn

6.1 6 36.6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud

10 Gashaw Asemamaw

2.5 19.6

3 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud CIS

11 Adese Mekonenet

2 12.5

7 Wood and ageda

Grass Mud Shembeko

12 Tayachew Adugn Asaye

3 3 9 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud

13 Meleke Ewnetu 6.4 6.1 39.0

4 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS -

14 Eneyesh Aserat Techanew

6 5.2 31.2 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

15 Menegesha Zerhune Lakew

6 4 24 Wood CIS Mud CIS

16 Muluken Mekonene Derso

8 5.1 40.8 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

17 Alemu Feleke Bogale

5.7 5.5 28.2 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

18 Zemetu Abera 4.1 5.4 22.1

4 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 80

No. NAME OF PAP Length (m)

Width

(m)

Radius (m)

AREA (m2)

WALL ROOF FLOO

R DOOR

WINDOW

19 Ayalew Mekonene

2.3 16.6

2 Ageda Ageda Mud Ageda -

20 Eyayu Wondey Zerhune

7.3 6 43.8 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

21 Mamash Workey

2.1 13.8

5 Ageda Ageda Mud Tawela CIS

22 Eshety Mekonene Zeleke

2.8 24.6

3 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

23 Molla Legese Setey

6 5.4 32.4 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

24 Emuhye Lekeneshe Mulaw Mera

2 12.5

7 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

25 Yegezaw Abebe Nega

2.6 21.2

4 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

26 Gerema Alemenehe Jenber

2.9 26.4

2 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

27 W/ro Yelega Bemere Tasewe

2.6 21.2

4 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

28 Enedalwe Takele Zelke

2.2 15.2

1 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

29 Desetawe Dagnewe Hialu

2.7 22.9

0 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

30 Adane Welede Kedane

6.2 4 24.8 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

31 Seteyn Wale Betewa

2.9 26.4 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

32 Chmase Worku 1.5 7.07 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

33 Zeleke Mete Legese

6.7 6.5 43.5

5 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

34 Abebaw Demesashe Amare

6.1 6 36.6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

35 Sisay Guadey Ayele

6.3 5.6 35.2

8 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

36 Enu Mekonene Tebeje

5.3 4.1 21.7

3 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

37 Beyadgln Worku 5.8 5.8 33.6 Wood and CIS Mud CIS

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 81

No. NAME OF PAP Length (m)

Width

(m)

Radius (m)

AREA (m2)

WALL ROOF FLOO

R DOOR

WINDOW

Techanew mud

38 Abeyu Sisay Fetene

2.4 18.1

0 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

39 Balemuay Kasse Aserese

2.4 18.1

0 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

40 Yelekal sisay Fetene

2 12.5

7 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

41 Weretaw Alemu Feleke

6 4.7 28.2 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

42 Alebachewe Eyayu

2 12.5

7 Wood

Grass (Ageda)

Mud CIS

43 Mulu Alem Babel

8 6.5 52 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

44 Mulu Alem Agegnu Tesega

14.6 8.1 118.26

Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

45 Abebawe Agemase Zewdw

3 28.2

7 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud CIS

GURAMBA BATA

1 Aragaw Wonedie Feleke

5.2 6 31.2 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

2 Abebe Mitiku Abate

5.9 5 29.5 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

3 Dagnawe Abebe Mitiku

5.6 5.2 29.1

2 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

4 Emahoye Enate Ayele

3 4 12 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

5 Nega Shiferawe Wassie

5.9 5.4 31.8

6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

6 Merigeta Miserake G/mariame

5.9 5.3 31.2

7 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

7 Bayeleygne Getahune Meshesha

2.6 21.2

2 Wood

Wood and ageda

Mud Wood

8 W/ro Yeneguse Bayeleyegne Getahune

1.7 9.1 Wood and mud

Wood and ageda

Mud Wood

9 Tegabe Bayeleyegne Getahune

6 6.6 39.6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 82

No. NAME OF PAP Length (m)

Width

(m)

Radius (m)

AREA (m2)

WALL ROOF FLOO

R DOOR

WINDOW

10 Akalu Sisaye Woreku

2 12.5

6 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

11 Kasawe Abebe Mitiku

5.9 5.3 31.2

7 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

12 Amisale Derebe Wenedimeagegne

2.4 18.1 Wood and ageda

Eucalyptus and Shenbeko

Mud Wood

13 Addisu Beze 6.1 5.6 34.1

6 Wood and ageda

CIS Mud CIS

14 Adane Ayele Fesha

6 8 48 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

15 Dese Adisu Beze

2.4 18.1 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 83

No. NAME OF PAP Length (m)

Width

(m)

Radius (m)

AREA (m2)

WALL ROOF FLOO

R DOOR

WINDOW

ACHERA

1 Sentayew Abate G/tekeley

2.5 19.6

5 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Sanka

2 Asechalew Sentayew Abate

2.3 16.6 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Sanka

3 Ademase Sentayhu

2.5 19.6

5 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Sanka

4 Belete Sentay 1.5 7.1 Wood Grass (Ageda)

Mud Sanka

5 Huneghaw Tesefhune Muaye

5.4 5.2 28.0

8 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

6 Huneghaw Tesefhune Muaye

2 2.5 5 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud CIS

7 Emahoye Fentaneshe Belay

2.5 19.6 Wood Grass (Ageda)

Mud Sanka

8 Tegabu Melese 12.5

6 Wood and ageda

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

9 Setotaw Tegabu 1.25 5 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Wood

10 Huluager Bezabhe

5.4 4.2 22.7 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

11 Yezabe Belete Desse

1.25 5 Wood and ageda

Ageda Mud Shembeko

12 Yezabe Belete Desse

2.5 2 5 Wood and ageda

Ageda Mud Shembeko

13 Wondalew Gedelu Ambaw

6.1 5.6 34.1

6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

14 Demesi Mesefin Guadi

2 12.5

6 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud CIS -

15 Agegnchew Wereta Alene

5 5.9 29.5 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS -

16 Addisalem Wertaw Alene

2 12.5

6 Wood and mud

Ageda Mud CIS -

17 Aweke Mesfen 4.25 5.2 22.1 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS -

18 Tesfhune Muaye Lakew

6 6.8 40.8 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 84

No. NAME OF PAP Length (m)

Width

(m)

Radius (m)

AREA (m2)

WALL ROOF FLOO

R DOOR

WINDOW

19 Telhune Tegegn Ambaw

6.6 5.9 38.9

4 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

20 W/ro Kassa Yalew Teghe

1.5 7.1 Wood and mud

Ageda Mud Sanka

21 Desse Musy Ayenew

2 12.5

6 Wood and mud

Grass (Ageda)

Mud Shembeko

22 Eneyewe Azene Kasse

5.3 5 26.5 Wood and mud

CIS Mud Wood

CHENKER

1 Wedalwe Hiyla mulkene

6.1 6 36.6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

2 Menegesete Abuhaye Tesga

2 12.5

7 Wood and mud

Grass Mud Wood

3 Abuhaye Tesga Agedewe

6 6 36 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS CIS

4 W/ro Musherit Asemamawe

2.5 19.6

3 Wood and mud

Grass Mud CIS

5 Degese Getachew Wabenhe

2 12.5

7 Wood Grass Mud

6 Aweke Haile 2.5 19.6

3 Ageda Grass Mud

7 Dese Girema 5.8 7 40.6 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

8 Agemase Abahoye Tesega

5.9 5.9 34.8

1 Wood and mud

CIS Mud CIS

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 85

TABLE 10. AVERAGE YIELD PER HETARE OF LAND FOR MAJOR CROPS

CROP TYPES YEAR

2002 2000 1999 1998 1998-2002

Teff 20 14 16 18 17.2

Barley 20 12 17 19 17.2

Wheat 23 19 17 28 21.2

Finger Millet 28 16 16 17 19.6

Maize 29 25 45 65 40

Sorghum 32 16 35 23 26.2

Beans 17 11 15 12 14.4

Peas 18 7 10 8 10.4

Chick Peas 22 18 18 20 20.4

Lint 8 7 6 5 6.8

Guae 28 19 18 20 21.4

Nueg 8 5 6 6 6.2

Cabbage seed 10 7 7 12 8.6

Potatoes 78 82 100 120 94.4

Onions 55 49 70 90 69.6

Peppers 15 10 12 13 12.6

Abesh 8 11 12 12 10.6

Tikure Azmode 8 8 9 8 8.6

Neche Azmode 25 30 30 26 27.6

Source: Project Consultant’s Market Survey

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 86

TABLE 11. MARKET PRICES OF ANNUAL CROPS IN DEMBIA WOREDA

TYPE OF AGRICULTURAL

PRODUCT UNIT

RETAIL PRICES

2009 2010

Jan March April Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Cereal

Teff

Nech teff Quintal 900 841.7 850 840 800 736 720 733 763

Sergna teff Quintal 800 775 775 750 750 663 650 633 615

Key teff Quintal 750 681.8 700 650 625 640 407 357 350

Barley (ghebs)

Nech ghebs Quintal 350 430 525 400 350 400 407 357 350

Dibilik Quintal 375 387 470 300 300 250 277 325 378

Wheat (sindie)

Nech Quintal 700 675 641 550 576 590 567 560

Debilik Quintal 650 575 582 425 400 490 466 525 531

Maize (bekollo)

Nech Quintal 500 450 420 325 300 316 310 350 378

Bicha Quintal 450 453 420 275 250 273 286 318 340

Sorghum (mashilla)

Nech Quintal 750 423 435 458 520 426 420 450 431

Debilik Quintal 700 400 412 433 450 370 370 393 361

Finger millet Quintal 550 - - - - - - - -

Ruff (ruz) Quintal 550 550 550 433 420 500 500 550 600

Pulse crops

Horse bean Quintal 700 591 675 600 600 500 500 630 610

Filed peas Quintal 750 650 750 750 750 590 541 600 600

Chick peas Quintal 690 525 850 425 420 525 500 523 538

Noug Quintal - 650 600 550 600 650 670 700 750

Rape seed Quintal - 433 480 500 400 340 350 600 550

Spices

White cumin Quintal - 733 679 580 - - - - -

Black pepper Quintal - 975 1,042 1,000 1,000 - - - -

Fenugreek Quintal - 750 725 991 - 900 1,000 1,333 1,000

Red pepper Quintal - 1,750 1,517 1,200 - 1,500 1,500 1,325 1333

Vegetables

Tomatoes K/gram - 3.3 3 5 3.5 3.15 3 2.4 3.5

Onions Quintal - 650 700 900 500 300 400 400 450

Ye-habsa onions Quintal - 675 700 800 750 650 350 680 620

Baro Quintal - - - - - - - - -

Garlic Quintal - 790 760 750 800 750 600 950 750

Potatoes Quintal - 350 300 300 450 425 450 400 350

Sources: WoARD, and Project Consultant’s Market Survey

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 87

TABLE 12. LOCAL MARKET PRICES FOR EUCALYPTUS, NATURALLY PLANTED AND PERENNIAL TREES

TREE NAME

Unit Price

(Birr) TREE NAME

Unit Price

(Birr) TREE NAME

Unit Price

(Birr)

Eucalyptus

Large 250 Kebeleta 40 Weraje 30

Medium 180 Mager (roof) 25 Chefeka 5

Small 120 Mager (wall) 18 Seedling 0.5

Naturally planted trees

Waneza: Large 450 Girare: Large 110 Bisana: Large 100

Medium 350 Medium 65 Medium 60

Small 150 Small 30 Small 25

Jacaranda: Large 100 Wareka: Large 450 Neme: Large 90

Medium 40 Medium 250 Medium 30

Small 20 Small 150 Small 20

Saspanya: Large 90 Tesde: Large 110 Shembeko 1

Medium 50 Medium 70

Small 20 Small 50

Seedling 2

Perennial trees

Orange: Large/Ripe (price per kg) 8

Abukato: Large/Ripe (price per kg) -

Coffee: Large/Ripe (price per kg) 50

Medium 90 Medium 90 Medium 30

Small 30 Small 30 Small 20

Mango: Large/Ripe (per kg) 10

Zeytone: Large/Ripe (per kg) 5

Banana: Large/Ripe (per kg) 8

Medium 90 Medium 90 Medium 90

Small 30 Small 30 Small 30

Gesho: Large/Ripe (per kg) 5

Medium 30

Small 20

Source: Market Survey, Project Consultant

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 88

TABLE 13. COST OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ONE HAND DUG WELL.

S.N. Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price

A)Well digging

1 Site clearing M2 16 10 160.00

2 Well digging

2.1 Soft soil Digging (1-4m) M3 7.065 400 2826.00

2.2 Hard soil Digging(1-4m) M3 7.065 10 70.65

2.3 Digging (1-4 m) in water bearing formation and discharging water

M3 7.065 10 70.65

2.4 Soft soil Digging (5-8m) M3 7.065 5 35.33

2.5 Hard Soil(rock) Digging (5-8m) M3 7.065 5 35.33

2.6 Digging (5-8m) in water bearing formation and discharging water

M3 7.065 5 35.33

2.7 Soft soil Digging (9-12m) M3 7.065 5 35.33

2.8 Digging hard rock soil (9-12m) M3 7.065 5 35.33

2.9 Digging (9-12m) in water bearing formation and discharging water

M3 7.065 5 35.33

3 Supply and pack with river gravel in the annulled space b/n concrete cylinder and well up to the top level well

M3 1.947 10 19.47

4 Back fill annulled space b/n and concrete well and cylinder using excavated soil in situ

M3 5.722 30 171.66

5 Cart away of the excavated soil left after using for back fill

M3 15.473 10 154.73

Sub total 3685.11

B)Concrete Work

1 Produce concrete cylinder with the following space ; Concrete grade-c-20 (Cylinder diameter ,internal 100cm , external 120m height 50cm )

M3 4.3 200 860.00

2 Plastering and pointing concrete cylinder jointing M2 2.84 50 142.00

3 Sealing with 20cm high mortar mix of 1;3;6 after concluding the work specified underA.3

M3 0.127 50 6.35

4 Sealing with mater mix of 1;3;6 after concluding the work specified under A.4

M3 0.318 50 15.9

5 Reinforcing bar steel

6 m. m kg 55 10 550.00

8 m.m kg 46.5 10 465.00

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 89

S.N. Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price

10 m.m kg 35.2 10 352.00

6 Installing Concert Ringing

1-4 met No 8 100 800.00

5-8met No 8 10 80.00

9-12 met No 9 10 90.00

7 Transporting concrete cylinder to well No 25 2 50.00

8 Construction of grade C-20 slab with thickness of 10cm

M3 0.384 10000 3840.00

Sub total 7251.25

C) Masonry work

1 Excavation of 40 cm depth foundation M3 3.15 800.00 2520.00

2 Filling hard rock M3 3.15 200 630.00

3 10 c m Concert work over hard core surface M3 0.45 3000 1350.00

4 Constructing masonry work 60cm height above the concrete and 2 meter width

M3 1.722 5000 8610.00

5 Construction of masonry stair cases (with 2 stair, 20cm height, 1meter length, and 25 cm width stair cases)

M3 0.1 1000 100.00

6 Construction of pump casing (with 40cm length, 40cm height, and 40cm width)

M3 0.051 1000 51.00

7 Construction of concrete pump ((with 10 cm thickness 50cm length, and 1.5cm width )

M3 0.025 1000 25.00

8 Installation of Hand pump No 1 100.00 100.00

9 Fencing the area (4*4) by wood with 2 meter height, and 50 distance between the wood and constructing the door by iron sheet

M2 16 375 6000.00

10 Cleaning finished holes with chemicals No 1 100 100.00

Sub Total 19486.00

D)Laundry canal construction

1 Excavation work for foundation M3 0.0928 400 371.2

2 Masonry work with width 40 cm M3 0.928 300 278.4

3 Masonry wall with 40cm width and 60 meter height

M3 1.392 600 835.2

4 Disposal of waste material M3 0.928 400 371.2

5 Hard work filling M3 0.588 200 117.6

6 Placing of 5cm lean concrete With slope of 1;2 over the masonry

M3 0.165 100 16.5

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 90

S.N. Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price

7 Construction of 10cm height And 10 cm thickness washing baben

M3 0.131 2000 262.00

8 Plastering work M2 5.55 50 277.5

Sub total 2529.6

E)Cattle Trough

1 Excavation of foundation (with 50cm depth,70cm width and,3meter length)

M3 1.32 40 52.8

2 Masonry work (50 cm depth underground and 40 cm above the ground )

M3 2.376 300 712.8

3 Disposal of waste materials M3 1.32 40 52.28

4 Filling with core stoning M3 0.264 800 211.2

5 Placing of lean concert (above 5cm height Masonry work

M3 0.165 2000 330.00

6 Construction of cattle Trough (With 20 cm height ,15cm thickness and 1:2:3 mix) above the lean concrete

M3 0.342 3000 1026.00

7 Placing 1 inches pipe with fitting No 30 10 300.00

8 Placing 1 inches gate valve meter 2 100 200.00

9 Plastering work M2 5.35 100 535

Sub total 3420.00

Summary

Digging well 3685.11

Concrete work 7251.25

Masonry Work 19486.00

Laundry canal construction (Used for cloth washing) 2529.6

Cattle Trough 3420.00

Total Construction cost 36,372.56

Monitoring and support 7,127.44

Total cost 43,500.00

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 91

TABLE 14. AVERAGE YIELD PER HECTARE OF LAND FOR MAJOR CROPS PRODUCED IN THE PROJECT AREA

Type of crop

Year Market price for Cereals

Crop in Quintal(ETB)

Market price for Cereals Crop In

Kg (ETB) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1998-2002

Teff 20 18 14 16 18 17.2 900 9

Barely 20 18 12 17 19 17.2

Wheat 23 19 19 17 28 21.2

Finger Millet 28 21 16 16 17 19.6 550 5.5

Maize 29 36 25 45 65 40 500 5

Sorghum 32 25 16 35 23 26.2 600 6

Bean 17 17 11 15 12 14.4

Pea 18 9 7 10 8 10.4

Chick Pea 22 24 18 18 20 20.4 750 7.5

Lint 8 8 7 6 5 6.8

Guae 28 22 19 18 20 21.4

Nueg 8 6 5 6 6 6.2

Cabbage seed 10 7 7 7 12 8.6

Potato 78 92 82 100 120 94.4

Onion 55 84 49 70 90 69.6 500 5

Pepper 15 13 10 12 13 12.6

Abesh 8 10 11 12 12 10.6 1100 11

Tikure Azmode 8 10 8 9 8 8.6

Neche azmode 25 27 30 30 26 27.6

TABLE 15. LOCAL MARKET PRICE FOR EUCALYPTUS AND INDIGENOUS TREES

No 1.Eculaptus tree Unit Price

1.1 Small 120

1.2 Medium 180

1.3 Big 250

1.4 very Big 500

1.5 Kebeleta 40

1.6 Weraje 30

1.7 Mager(roof) 25

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 92

1.8 Mager(wall) 18

1.9 Chefeka 5

1.1 Seedling 0.5

1.11 Gutoo 18

2. Naturally planted trees

2.1.Waneza

2.1.1 Big 450

2.1.2 Medium 350

2.1.3 small 150

2.1.4 Sedlling 10

2.2 2.2.Girare

2.2.1 Big 110

2.2.2 Medium 65

2.2.3 Small 30

2.3.Bisana

2.3.1 Big 100

2.3.2 Medium 60

2.3.3 Small 25

2.4.Saspanya

2.4.1 Big 90

2.4.2 Medium 50

2.4.3 small 20

2.4.4 Seedling 2

2.5.Wareka

2.5.1 Big 450

2.5.2 Medium 250

2.5.3 Small 150

2.6.shembeko

2.6.1 Shembeko 1

2.7.Jakeranda

2.7.1 Big 100

2.7.2 Medium 40

2.7.3 Small 20

2.8.Neme

2.8.1 Big 90

2.8.2 Medium 30

2.8.3 Small 20

2.9.Tesde

2.9.1 Big 110

2.9.2 Medium 70

2.9.3 Small 50

3.Perennial Trees

3.1.Orange

3.1.1 Big/ripe(price Per Kg) 10

3.1.2 Medium 90

3.1.3 Small 30

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 93

3.2.Abukato

3.2.1 Big /ripe(price Per Kg)

3.2.2 Medium 90

3.2.3 Small 30

3.3.Mango

3.3.1 Big/ripe (price Per Kg) 10

3.3.2 Medium 90

3.3.3 Small 30

3.4.Zeytone

3.4.1 Big/ripe(price Per Kg) 5

3.4.2 Medium 90

3.4.3 Small 30

3.5.coffee

3.5.1 Big/ripe(price Per Kg) 50

3.5.2 Medium 30

3.5.3 Small 20

3.6.Banana

3.6.1 Big/ripe(price Per Kg) 8

3.6.2 Medium 90

3.6.3 Small 30

3.7.Gesho

3.7.1 Big/ripe(price Per Kg) 5

3.7.2 Medium 30

3.7.3 Small 20

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 94

TABLE 16. SUMMARY OF THE PAYMENT SCHEDULE (FOR THREE YEARS) N

ame

of

Aff

ecte

d K

ebel

e/

Inve

sto

r

Siz

e o

f L

and

Ho

ldin

g

Aff

ecte

d B

y th

e P

roje

ct

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

far

m

lan

d

in B

irr

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

irri

gat

ed f

arm

lan

d in

Bir

r

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

gra

zin

g la

nd

in b

irr

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

Lan

d

Imp

rove

men

t in

bir

r

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

Per

enn

ial c

rop

s in

bir

r

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

tree

s

in b

irr

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

Res

iden

tial

ho

use

s

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

Oth

er

stru

ctu

res(

Kit

chen

An

imal

sh

ed a

nd

gra

in

sto

re)

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

han

d

du

g w

ell &

Pu

blic

Fac

iliti

es i

n b

irr

Tra

nsi

tio

nal

Allo

wan

ces

in B

irr

Sh

ifti

ng

Allo

wan

ces

To

tal C

om

pen

sati

on

an

d

Allo

wan

ce in

bir

r

Seraba Dabelo 102.34 4741467.70 527006.03 2118.00 110521.82 120.00 362052.00 1106578.14 111470.23 89000.00 54000.00 45000.00 7149333.92

Meskele Kiristose

4.48 207928.02 40161.00 0.00 4843.04 0.00 2528.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255460.07

Achera 26.60 1233413.14 0.00 0.00 28728.61 3310.00 146567.00 316114.74 40980.18 24000.00 20000.00 1813113.67

Aberjha 36.81 1707033.79 627571.74 0.00 39760.14 0.00 954.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2375319.67

Guramba Bata 32.52 1505219.67 0.00 1325.52 35116.31 0.00 91092 352779.88 18403.22 379500.00 18000.00 15000.00 2416436.60

Chenker 48.44 2246075.19 520627.29 0.00 52315.50 0.00 26590.5 179308.00 32074.00 9600.00 8000 3074590.49

Investors 8.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 1121430.00 12463.00 1133893.00

Communal grazing land(all kebeles)

29.38 0.00 0.00 740376.00 740376.00

Residential area Guramba Kebele

0.32

Residential area Guramba Kebele

0.31 0.00 0.00

Total 289.73 11,641,137.53 1,715,366.0 743,819.52 271,285.4 1,124,860.00 642,246.50 1,954,780.7 202,927.63 468,500.00 105,600.00 88,000.00 18,958,523.42

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 95

The Legal Verification document, submitted to the MoWE, is included in a disk attached to these Appendices.

The process followed in legal verification, and verification of the names of landholders affected by the Project,

are included in the document.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 96

TABLE 17. VULNERABLE GROUPS: QUESTIONNAIRE TABLE

Name of Kebele __________________

No.

Name of affected people

(Household heads)

Vulnerable group (indicate by √ mark)

Female household head

Chronically ill

Very old

HIV/AIDS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 97

TABLE 18. RESETTLEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSES: QUESTIONNAIRE TABLE

Individual Choice for The Resettlement Of Residential Houses

Name of Kebele__________________

No

Name of individuals who will stay on the remaining own plot

M/F

Name of individuals who will move to other areas/village Name of individuals moving to villages outside the project area on

their own plots

M/F

Own plot M/F Asking for new plot M/F

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Note: ask the Affected population to divide themselves into four groups, as indicated in the table, and list their names.

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 98

TABLE 19. HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS AGE BY KEBELE

AGE

KEBELE

TOTAL SERABA DABLO

GURAMBA BATA

ACHERA ABERJEHA CHENKER MESKEL

KIRISTOS

No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %

<=4 67 14.38 10 25.00 45 14.24 28 10.61 15 9.43 4 8.33 169 13.07

5-9 73 15.67 9 22.50 53 16.77 44 16.67 25 15.72 7 14.58 211 16.32

10-14 82 17.60 4 10.00 48 15.19 38 14.39 27 16.98 10 20.83 209 16.16

15-19 65 13.95 3 7.50 44 13.92 41 15.53 23 14.47 8 16.67 184 14.23

20-24 57 12.23 5 12.50 38 12.03 27 10.23 13 8.18 4 8.33 144 11.14

25-29 34 7.30 3 7.50 24 7.59 20 7.58 13 8.18 2 4.17 96 7.42

30-34 22 4.72 2 5.00 13 4.11 18 6.82 9 5.66 2 4.17 66 5.10

35-39 24 5.15 - - 7 2.22 20 7.58 12 7.55 4 8.33 67 5.18

40-44 15 3.22 - - 11 3.48 8 3.03 7 4.40 1 2.08 42 3.25

45-49 6 1.29 2 5.00 14 4.43 4 1.52 8 5.03 - - 34 2.63

50-54 14 3.00 1 2.50 13 4.11 9 3.41 5 3.14 1 2.08 43 3.33

55-59 2 .43 - - 2 .63 1 .38 1 .63 2 4.17 8 .62

60-64 3 .64 - - 2 .63 2 .76 - - - - 7 .54

>=65 2 .43 1 2.50 2 .63 4 1.52 1 .63 3 6.25 13 1.01

Total 466 100 40 100 316 100 264 100 159 100 48 100 1,293 100

TABLE 20. GENDER OF HOUSEHOLD HEADS BY KEBELE

GENDER

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

Male

No. 67 8 56 42 23 7 203

% 76.14 100 84.85 79.25 74.19 100 80.24

Female

No. 21 - 10 11 8 - 50

% 23.86 - 15.15 20.75 25.81 - 19.76

TOTAL No. 88 8 66 53 31 7 253

% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 99

TABLE 21. LITERACY LEVEL ACCORDING TO AGE OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE

AGE

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %

<=4 - - - - 1 0.8 - - - - - - 1 0.2

5-9 20 9.8 2 11.1 17 14.1 9 7.6 5 6.3 2 10.0 55 9.8

10-14 35 17.2 2 11.1 14 11.6 15 12.6 10 12.7 2 10.0 78 13.9

15-19 26 12.8 1 5.6 12 9.9 19 16.0 6 7.6 3 15.0 67 11.9

20-24 37 18.1 5 27.8 17 14.1 13 10.9 8 10.1 1 5.0 81 14.4

25-29 21 10.3 2 11.1 17 14.1 15 12.6 11 13.9 1 5.0 67 11.9

30-34 13 6.4 2 11.1 7 5.8 10 8.4 8 10.1 2 10.0 42 7.5

35-39 18 8.8 - - 2 1.7 14 11.8 11 13.9 3 15.0 48 8.6

40-44 11 5.4 - - 6 5.0 7 5.9 6 7.6 1 5.0 31 5.5

45-49 5 2.5 2 11.1 10 8.3 4 3.4 7 8.9 - - 28 5.0

50-54 13 6.4 1 5.6 13 10.7 6 5.0 5 6.3 1 5.0 39 7.0

55-59 1 0.5 - - 2 1.7 1 0.8 1 1.3 2 10.0 7 1.3

60-64 3 1.5 - - 2 1.7 2 1.7 - - - - 7 1.3

>=65 1 0.5 1 5.56 1 0.8 4 3.4 1 1.3 2 10.0 10 1.8

TOTAL 204 100 18 100 121 100 119 100 79 100 20 100 561

100

TABLE 22. PHYSICAL STATUS OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE

PHYSICAL ABILITY

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

Able bodied

No. 454 40 309 259 145 48 1,255

% 97.4 100 97.8 98.1 91.2 100 97.1

Disabled No. 5 - 2 5 - - 12

% 1.1 - 0.6 1.9 - - 0.9

Other Limitation

No. 7 - 5 - 14 - 26

% 1.5 - 1.6 - 8.8 - 2.0

TOTAL No. 466 40 316 264 159 48 1,293

% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 100

TABLE 23. RELATIONSHIP OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS TO HOUSEHOLD HEADS BY KEBELE

RELATIONSHIP

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

Household Head

No. 88 8 66 53 31 7 253

% 18.9 20.0 20.9 20.1 19.5 14.6 19.6

Spouse No. 70 8 56 41 20 7 202

% 15.0 20.0 17.7 15.5 12.6 14.6 15.6

Son No. 145 11 95 88 56 18 413

% 31.1 27.5 30.1 33.3 35.2 37.5 31.9

Daughter No. 135 12 96 77 43 16 379

% 29.0 30.0 30.4 29.2 27.0 33.3 29.3

Relative No. 22 1 2 3 9 - 37

% 4.7 2.5 0.6 1.1 5.7 - 2.9

Dependent No. 6 - 1 2 - - 9

% 1.3 - 0.3 0.8 - - 0.7

TOTAL No. 466 40 316 264 159 48 1,293

% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

TABLE 24. EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE

EMPLOYMENT TYPE

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

Crop production

No. 254 17 148 189 105 26 739

% 54.5 42.5 46.8 71.6 66.0 54.2 57.2

Livestock No. 31 2 26 8 - - 67

% 6.7 5.0 8.2 3.0 - - 5.2

Off-farm No. 8 2 3 - 1 2 16

% 1.7 5.0 1.0 - 0.6 4.2 1.2

Home-maker No. 15 5 19 21 5 1 66

% 3.2 12.5 6.0 8.0 3.1 2.1 5.1

Not Active No. 110 14 79 42 46 19 310

% 23.6 35.0 25.0 15.9 28.9 39.6 24.0

Other activates

No. 48 - 41 4 2 - 95

% 10.3 - 13.0 1.5 1.3 - 7.4

TOTAL No. 466 40 316 264 159 48 1,293

% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 101

TABLE 25. SECONDARY EMPLOYMENT OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BY KEBELE

SECONDARY EMPLOYMENT TYPE

KEBELE TOTAL

Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

Learning No. 1 - 6 1 - - 8

% 3.6 - 40.0 4.8 - - 10.8

Tannery No. 2 1 1 8 - - 12

% 7.1 100 6.7 38.1 - - 16.2

Carpenter No. 4 - - - 1 - 5

% 14.3 - - - 50.0 - 6.8

Blacksmith No. - - 5 - - - 5

% - - 33.3 - - - 6.8

Poultry No. 18 - - - - 7 25

% 64.3 - - - - 100 33.8

Petty Trading

No. 1 - 3 6 1 - 11

% 3.6 - 20.0 28.6 50.0 - 14.9

Daily Labour

No. 2 - - 6 - - 8

% 7.1 - - 28.6 - - 10.8

TOTAL No. 28 1 15 21 2 7 74

% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

TABLE 26. FORMAL LAND POSSESSION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY KEBELE

LAND POSSESSIO

N

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %

<=0.250 1 1.4 - - 2 4.6 2 3.8 1 3.2 - - 6 2.8

0.251-0.500 7 10.0 1 16.7 6 13.6 13 24.5 5 16.1 - - 32 15.2

0.501-0.750 7 10.0 - - 6 13.6 6 11.3 7 22.6 - - 26 12.3

0.751-1.000 12 17.1 1 16.7 10 22.7 12 22.6 7 22.6 1 14.3 43 20.4

1.001-1.250 6 8.6 2 33.3 3 6.8 4 7.6 2 6.5 - - 17 8.1

1.251-1.500 7 10.0 1 16.7 4 9.1 6 11.3 3 9.7 1 14.3 22 10.4

1.501-1.750 4 5.7 - - 2 4.6 1 1.9 4 12.9 - - 11 5.2

1.751-2.000 9 12.9 - - 4 9.1 5 9.4 1 3.2 2 28.6 21 10.0

2.001-2.250 5 7.1 - - 2 4.6 - - 1 3.2 2 28.6 10 4.7

2.251-2.500 3 4.3 1 16.7 3 6.8 3 5.7 - - - - 10 4.7

2.501-2.750 2 2.9 - - 1 2.3 - - - - - - 3 1.4

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 102

2.751-3.000 7 10.0 - - 1 2.3 - - - - 1 14.3 9 4.3

>3.000 - - - - - - 1 1.89 - - - - 1 0.5

Total 70 100 6 100 44 100 53 100 31 100 7 100 211 100

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 103

TABLE 27. ANNUAL INCOME OF HOUSEHOLDS BY KEBELE

ANNUAL INCOME

KEBELE

TOTAL Seraba Dablo

Guramba Bata

Achera Aberjeha Chenker Meskel Kiristos

No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %

<=1,500 3 3.6 - - 4 6.5 4 9.5 - - - - 11 4.9

1,501-3,000 2 2.4 - - 8 12.9 4 9.5 - - - - 14 6.2

3,001-4,500 10 12.1 1 12.5 6 9.7 5 11.9 - - - - 22 9.8

4,501-6,000 3 3.6 - - 5 8.1 4 9.5 - - - - 12 5.3

6,001-7,500 3 3.6 - - 6 9.7 3 7.1 1 4.4 - - 13 5.8

7,501-9,000 2 2.4 1 12.5 6 9.7 3 7.1 1 4.4 - - 13 5.8

9,001-10,500 8 9.6 1 12.5 8 12.9 3 7.1 1 4.4 - - 21 9.3

10,501-12,000

4 4.8 1 12.5 2 3.2 1 2.4 1 4.4 1 14.3 10 4.4

12,001-13,500

2 2.4 1 12.5 2 3.2 3 7.1 1 4.4 - - 9 4.0

13,501-15,000

5 6.0 2 25.0 3 4.8 2 4.8 1 4.4 - - 13 5.8

15,001-16,500

3 3.6 - - - - 3 7.1 1 4.4 - - 7 3.1

16,501-18,000

4 4.8 1 12.5 2 3.2 - - 1 4.4 - - 8 3.6

18,001-19,500

3 3.6 - - 1 1.6 - - - - - - 4 1.8

19,501-21,000

6 7.2 - - - - - - - - - - 6 2.7

21,001-22,500

3 3.6 - - 2 3.2 2 4.8 - - 1 14.3 8 3.6

22,501-24,000

3 3.6 - - 2 3.2 - - 2 8.7 - - 7 3.1

24,001-25,500

4 4.8 - - 1 1.6 - - - - - - 5 2.2

25,501-27,000

2 2.4 - - 1 1.6 - - 1 4.4 - - 4 1.8

27,001-28,500

1 1.2 - - 1 1.6 - - 1 4.4 3 42.9 6 2.7

28,501-30,000

1 1.2 - - - - 3 7.1 1 4.4 - - 5 2.2

30,001-31,500

1 1.2 - - - - 2 4.8 2 8.7 - - 5 2.2

31,501- 1 1.2 - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.4

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 104

33,000

33,001-34,500

1 1.2 - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.4

34,501-36,000

- - - - - - - - 1 4.4 - - 1 0.4

36,001-37,500

- - - - - - - - 1 4.4 1 14.3 2 0.9

37,501-39,000

- - - - 1 1.6 - - - - - - 1 0.4

40,501-42,000

3 3.6 - - - - - - - - - - 3 1.3

43,501-45,000

- - - - - - - - - - 1 14.3 1 0.4

>45,000 5 6.0 - - 1 1.6 - - 6 26.1 - - 12 5.3

Total 83 100 8 100 62 100 42 100 23 100 7 100 225 100

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 105

TABLE 28. EXAMPLES OF MONITORING INDICATORS OF PROJECT-AFFECTED PEOPLE

SUBJECT/IMPACT INDICATOR VARIABLE

Land Acquisition of land Area of cultivation land acquired for the Project - public, private, communal

Timely acquisition of land

All affected families have replacement land and are farming

Change in land productivity per unit (acres, hectares)

Distance from homestead to farm, and to market the farm products

Buildings/Structures Acquisition of buildings and other structures

Number, type and size of replacement private residential buildings e.g. number of rooms/windows/doors, materials used for roofing/walls/ windows/doors/floor

Number of family members using the residential structure

Number, type and size of other structures replaced - public, private, communal

Durability and environmental suitability of replacement structures

Trees and Crops Acquisition of trees Number, type, ownership of private trees acquired, by area

Destruction of crops

Number, type, ownership of crops destroyed, by area

Compensation, Re-establishment and Rehabilitation

Compensation and re-establishment

Number/register of households affected (buildings, land, trees, crops)

Number/register of owners compensated by type of loss

Number/register of individuals/households classified as vulnerable

Amount compensated by type and owner

Number, type and size of structures, as above

Possession of latrines

Electricity access

Water supply

Type/number of allowances paid

Legal rights Number households restricted on access to livelihood sources (farming) due to no legal tenure rights e.g. land certificates

Household production and earning capacity

Ownership of capital assets, possession of consumer durables

Ownership of equipment and machinery

Landholding size, area cultivated and production volume/value, by crop (cash and subsistence crops)

Landholding status (tenure)

Redistribution of cultivation land

Pre-project production and income (year before land used) measured against current production and income

Changes to livestock ownership, and consumption of own livestock, post-disturbance

Employment status of economically active household members, by gender

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 106

Skills of household members, by gender

Number of affected population trained in Project-related training courses (including off-farm income trainees), by gender; level of training of vulnerable groups

Level of adopting improved agricultural techniques

Earnings/income by source, other than compensation payments, by gender

Changes to income-earning activities (agriculture and off-farm), pre- and post-disturbance, by gender

Amount/balance of income and expenditure

Realisation of household income restoration plans (components implemented, net income achieved)

Access to income-generating natural resource base (water, wood, grass)

Establishment of social services

Number, type of social services re-established e.g. dugwells, primary school

Social/Demographic Population influx Influx of people into the Project Area

Growth in number, size of settlements, formal and informal around construction works

Changes to household structure

Household size (births, deaths, migration in/out)

Age distribution

Gender distribution

Marital status

Relationships to household head

Status of vulnerable households

Migration Residential status of household members

Movement in/out of the homestead (place and residence of homestead members)

Changes to access Distance/travel time to nearest school, health centre, shop, market for purchase/sale of goods, and mosques

Changes to health status

Nutritional status (see food security below)

Number of people with disease, by type

Number of HIV/AIDS cases reported, and level of awareness and behavioural changes relating to HIV/AIDS status

Mortality rates

Access to health care services (distance to nearest facility, cost of services, quality of services)

Utilisation of health care services

Disease prevention strategies

Extent of educational programmes

Level of psychological stress

Number of households affected by hazards and disturbances from construction (noise levels, blasting, increased traffic levels)

Food security Food utilisation

Levels of food availability and accessibility

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 107

Food intake (number of meals taken per day per household)

Reported number of months with food shortage

Changes to educational status

Number, type of educational establishments, including replacement structures affected by the Project

Literacy and educational attainment

School attendance rates (age, gender)

Changes to status of women

Participation in Project-related farming activities

Participation in Project-related rehabilitation measures

Participation in Project-related training programmes

Participation in Project-related employment opportunities

Landholding status

Use of credit facilities

Income-earning capacity

Changes in social organisation

Organisational membership of household members

Leadership positions held by household members, by gender

Social cohesion and community relationships

Number people resettled to the same Kebele

Level of social organisation at community level e.g. number/type of social/self-help groups developed

Level of cohesion among kinship groups

Level of people’s satisfaction on their interaction within the community

Consultation Consultation programme operation

Number of Project-related structures established

Composition of Project-related structures, by gender

Number and dates of Project-related structures’ meetings

Attendance at Project-related structures’ meetings, by gender

Number of Project-related structures’ members trained, by gender

Type of issues raised at Project-related structures’ meetings

Involvement of government

Name and number of participating NGOs

Grievances resolved

Number, type of grievances registered, by gender

Number of grievances resolved/unresolved

Number of cases referred for arbitration/to court

Management Institutional development

Establishment of RAP institutional base

Office resources of Resettlement Implementation Unit

Staffing component of Resettlement Implementation Unit, by gender

Number, function of implementing agencies

Capacity training of implementing agencies

Number, function of available government departments and officials

Procedures in operation

Census and asset verification/quantification procedures

Effectiveness of compensation delivery system

RAP for Megech Pump (at Seraba): Draft RAP January 2011 108

Number of land transfers effected

Co-ordination between local community structures and the implementation agencies