etp guideline (september 2015)

8/15/2019 Etp Guideline (September 2015)

1/39

ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT (MCB 3053)

GUIDELINES

------

SEPTEMBER 2015

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS 31750 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.


2/39

E n g i n e e r i n g T e a m P r o j e c t ( E T P ) : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 S e m e s t e r Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contents Page

_______________________________________________________________________

1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . 4

2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES . . . 4

3. SCOPE OF PROJECT . . . . . . 5

4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK . . . . . 5

4.1 Project Proposal . . . . . . 5

4.2 Progress Report . . . . . . 6

4.3 Development of Prototype / Model . . . . 6

4.4 Poster Presentation . . . . . . 6

4.5 Demonstration of Working Prototype / Model . . . 6

4.6 Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) . . 7

4.7 Oral Presentation . . . . . . 7

4.8 Final Report . . . . . . . 7

5. ETP COORDINATORS . . . . . . 8

6. SUPERVISORS . . . . . . . 8

6.1 Supervisor 1 . . . . . . . 8

6.2 Supervisor 2 . . . . . . . 8

7. ETP ANNOUNCEMENTS . . . . . . 8

8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS . . . . . 9

9. EVALUATION . . . . . . . 9

10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE . . . . . 9

11. LABORATORY . . . . . . . 13

12. PLAGIARISM . . . . . . . 13

13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT . . . 13


3/39


14. APPENDICES . . . . . . . 18

APPENDICES:

Page

APPENDIX I IMPORTANTDATES 18 ..................................................................................................................

APPENDIX II PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC....................................................19

APPENDIX III PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET ............................................ 21

APPENDIX IV PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET .............................................. 22

APPENDIX V FABRICATION SCORE SHEET ......................................................... 23

APPENDIX VI POSTER EVALUATION SHEET ........................................................ 24

APPENDIX VII DEMO. OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL ............................... 25

APPENDIX VIII ORAL PRESENTATION: GROUP ASSESSMENT ......................... 26

APPENDIX IX FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET ....................................................... 27

APPENDIX X CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC) ............ 28

APPENDIX XI RESULTCOMPILATION 29 ..................................................................................................................

APPENDIX XII LOGBOOK SUMMARY ....................................................................... 30

APPENDIX XIII PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT .................................................... 31

APPENDIX XIV SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT .......................................... 32

APPENDIX XV SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT ....................... 33

APPENDIX XVI STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM. .................................................. 34

APPENDIX XVII STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM – SAMPLE .............................. 35

APPENDIX XVIII JUSTIFICATION LETTER .................................................................. 36

APPENDIX XIX JUSTIFICATION LETTER – SAMPLE ............................................. 37

APPENDIX XX ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM ................................................... 38

APPENDIX XXI PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE ................................................... 39


4/39


1. INTRODUCTION

This course is offered to the 3rd year engineering students. The subject is designed to ensure

that students will acquire the knowledge in conducting research and development by

working in a team. This includes conducting literature research, preparing project proposal,

performing preliminary design concepts, simulation, and evaluation for the best concept

and designing the selected concept.

Students will be divided into groups that consist of five to six members of variousdisciplines namely Mechanical, Electrical & Electronics, Chemical, Civil and Petroleum

Engineering. Please note that in view of the dissimilar number of students registering for

this module from each engineering program, there are groups that may not have studentsfrom all five engineering disciplines. One or two supervisors will be assigned to each

group.

2. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES

The objectives of the Engineering Team Project (ETP) course are as follows:

To inculcate teamwork spirit.

To develop leadership skills as well as technical competency in:o delegation of various taskso analysing engineering problemso performing engineering designo enhancing software related skills

To broaden the knowledge on commercially available off-the-shelf equipment aswell as industrial equipment.

To develop knowledge in integrating components into a comprehensive workingsystem.

To provide a platform for advanced design courses.

To nurture creativity, innovativeness, and business acumen.

To provide exposure on project management skills

The course outcomes are; at the end of this course, students should be able to:

1. Apply engineering knowledge and solve engineering design problem.2. Work in a multi-disciplinary team-based project work.3. Apply the principle of project management.

4. Apply proper design process to produce creative and innovative solution.5. Demonstrate effective communication, report writing, presentation and

entrepreneur skills.

Note: These are NOT the objectives of the project work you are worki ng on.


5/39


3. SCOPE OF PROJECT

The scope of the project includes:

To generate conceptual designs

To perform necessary engineering calculations To generate engineering drawings of the selected concept

To develop a working model or prototype

The final result of the project shall be exhibited in the form of engineering drawings,reports, and a WORKING MODEL or PROTOTYPE. The conceptual design should

incorporate as many as possible elements or components of Electrical / Electronic /

Mechanical / Chemical / Civil / Petroleum engineering. The approach to solutions and

methodologies such as selection of materials, problem analysis etc., shall be based onfundamental engineering calculations. The feasibility and suitability of a project to be taken

as an ETP project are assessed by using the Project Assessment Rubric in Appendix II.

4. SUMMARY OF PROJECT WORK

Please refer to Appendix I for the schedule of the present semester.

4.1 Project Proposal

Each group shall discuss among members to come out with a suitable and feasible projectand more importantly within the time frame as specified in Appendix I. When an

agreement has been reached among the team members and also the supervisor, a project

proposal must be submitted for assessment. Prior to submission, the project proposal must be discussed with the respective supervisors to determine the scope, problems, and

practicality of the proposed project. The content of the proposal must be based on the

format in Appendix XIII. The report shall not exceed 12 pages including the appendices.

Each group must submit the project proposal to the supervisor by the due date specified in

Appendix I. The proposal will be assessed based on the marking scheme in Appendix III.

Note: Supervisors need to ensure that any draft proposal be reviewed and returned promptl y to

ensure that students are able to submi t their work on time.


6/39


4.2 Progress Report

A progress report must be submitted to the supervisor by the due date specified inAppendix I. The report will be graded based on the marking scheme in Appendix IV. Thereport, which shall not exceed 12 pages including the appendices, shall comprise:

details of the activities that need to be carried out

identification of potential problems

a few conceptual designs that have been considered

necessary preliminary engineering calculations, data collection and benefit-costanalysis that have been used in deciding the final design.

4.3 Development of Prototype / Model

Throughout the project, the supervisor will monitor the overall progress and development

of the project through meetings and logbooks as well as progress report. The prototype ormodel of the project must be completed by the date specified in Appendix I. Upon

completion, the group must make an arrangement with the supervisor for assessment of the

prototype or model. The assessment will generally be based on the planning, execution andthe quality of the prototype or model. Please refer to the format in Appendix V for the

guidelines of the assessment.

4.4 Poster Presentation

Each group will be required to present their results and findings in the form of ONE A-1

size poster with a portrait-layout. The poster presentation provides an opportunity for

students to expose or share their work, knowledge and experience with other students and

also with lecturers. The poster from each group will be examined, unmanned, by one ormore examiners in a session that will be advised further. Appendix VI provides the

guidelines on the poster exhibition assessment criteria. The tentative time for the sessionis indicated in Appendix I. The use of more than one poster will be penalised.

Selected posters will be exhibited in the Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX), whichis described in Section 4.6. The selection will be made based on the scores given by the

examiners for the posters and the demonstration/simulation of the working

prototype/model.

4.5 Demonstration / Simulation of Working Prototype/Model

All groups are also required to demonstrate or simulate a working prototype or model oftheir project before one or more examiners (non-supervisor). An actual model

demonstration is preferable, however, in certain cases, a computer simulation might be

acceptable depending on the nature of the project. This demonstration/simulation will beassessed based on the criteria specified in Appendix VII.

The scores for the demonstration/simulation, together with the poster, will be used by the

ETP Coordinators in selecting groups that will participate in the SEDEX.


7/39


4.6 Science & Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX)

The Science & Engineering Design Exhibition (SEDEX) is an event organized by the

university towards the end of every semester. It provides opportunities for students to

present their project works, mainly through the ETP and Final Year Project (FYP) courses.

Only selected projects will be allowed invited to participate. For ETP, selection will

generally be made based on the score obtained by groups in the evaluations for posters anddemonstrations.

All participants will be given certificates, and in addition winners will be awarded. Projects

with certain outstanding quality and innovation will be selected to represent the university

at national and international level competitions. It must be noted that the operationalmatters of the SEDEX is beyond the responsibility of ETP supervisors and coordinators.

There shall also be no extra marks for groups that participate or win awards in the SEDEX.

Certificates, awards and details of the SEDEX should be obtained only from the SEDEX

Committee.

4.7 Oral Presentation

During the demonstration session, students shall deliver a presentation on their findingsusing own laptop. Assessment on visual aspects, clarity of presentation, logic, knowledge

of subject matter and the overall content of the presentation will be made on a group basis

(Appendix VIII). Each group member must present some portion of the materials. Eachgroup will be allocated 10 minutes for the presentation, and another 5 minutes for a

question and answer session. The examiners will be the appointed lecturers, other than the

group supervisor.

4.8 Final Report

Each group shall submit a final report by the due date specified in Appendix I. The reportwill be assessed using the form in Appendix IX. In this report, the ultimate results and

findings of the project shall be presented. The report shall be assessed based on:

Critical review of current problems/solutions

Literature review

Development of alternatives and options

Decision making processes

Final Design (engineering drawing)

Technical/Scientific aspects/support

Business and economic considerations

Application/Viability of selected design Suggestion for area of improvements

Recommendations for future work

Please note that the report must be limited to thirty (30) pages excluding appendices,

figures and drawings.


8/39


5. COORDINATORS

The following lecturers are appointed by the Head of the Mechanical Engineering

Programme as the ETP Coordinators.

1. Dr Hilmi Hussin (05 368 7027, [email protected])2. Dr Setyamartana Parman (05 368 7197, [email protected])3. Dr Mazli Mustapha (05 368 7208, [email protected])

The responsibilities of the Coordinators can be summarised as follows:

Managing and implementing the ETP course.

Assigning student groups and supervisors.

Advising supervisors on the project assessment or any other problemsencountered during the project work.

Assigning examiners and coordinate seminar presentation and poster exhibition.

Facilitate expenditure claims. Compiling students’ results.

6. SUPERVISORS

6.1 Supervisor 1

Evaluating the project proposal, progress report, fabrication and final report basedon the rubric provided on timely basis.

Advising students on the preparation of their design projects, including but notlimited to the technical, economical and management aspects.

Monitoring of student's progress against Gantt chart through their weekly progressreports.

Certifying students’ expenditure claims.

Obtaining claims and disbursement to students.

Assigning IC score to individual student appropriately.

6.2 Supervisor 2 or Co-Supervisor

A Supervisor 2 may be nominated to assist in the supervision of a team. The responsibilities

of the Supervisor 2 are:

Where applicable, guiding students or providing support in any specific areasincluding but not limited to soft skills, language, report writing, business acumen,

etc., as and when necessary within the project time frame.

Representing Supervisor 1 in executing the tasks stipulated in Clause 6.1 under thecircumstances whereby Supervisor 1 is not able to perform the task(s).


9/39


7. ANNOUNCEMENTS

All announcements regarding ETP will be made through e-Learning or posters at strategic

locations (e.g. Pocket C and Pocket D). Students MUST regularly visit these sites to keep

themselves updated and informed of all important dates and announcements.

8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS

Students are required to conduct meetings regularly among themselves on project

implementation. In addition, all groups are required to arrange weekly meetings with the

supervisor. The attendance of group members will be recorded. The logbook, theattendance record as well as students active participation will be monitored to calculate for

Individual Contribution (IC) (see Section 9. EVALUATION).

Each student must forward logbooks individually to the supervisor during weeklymeetings. The verified logbook shall be returned at the end of the meeting. Each student

shall bring the compilation of the logbooks to the weekly meeting.

9. EVALUATION

Students will be evaluated based on their capability in undertaking the project, producing

the written report and presenting the result. The main components of evaluation are givenin Table 1. In general, the evaluation of the group will be carried out by supervisors

(55 %), appointed examiners (40 %), and peer evaluation (5 %), with a total of 100 %. The

evaluation forms for each component are given in the Appendices.

The individual score for Individual Contribution (IC) (see Appendix X) described in

Section 8. ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS, and peer evaluation (Appendix XXI)will be used to differentiate the individual score for each student in a group. Each studentwill also be evaluated based on prescribed criteria by other members of the team, by means

of peer evaluation. Instructions on peer evaluation will be provided approximately in the

last 3 weeks of the semester.

10. PROJECT EXPENDITURE

In building the prototype or model, each group may request project fund of up to RM 200

to purchase approved components or materials that are not available in laboratories at UTP.

Figure 1 shows the ETP Purchase Requisition Flow Chart that students need to follow in

order to purchase project materials, in which failure to comply with this procedure mayresult in non-payment of the claims. Table 2 provides further explanation to the process

flow chart.


10/39


Table 1: ETP Grading Structure.

Tentative ComponentsAssessment Contribution

Evaluation

Time Supervisor Panel of

Examiners

Peer

Evaluation

Forms

W 3 Project Proposal10 %

Appendix III

W 7 Progress Report10 %

Appendix IV

W 10Fabrication of Prototype or

Model10 % Appendix V

W 11 Poster Evaluation 10 % Appendix VI

W 11Demonstration of Prototype or

Model20% Appendix VII

W 11 Group Oral Presentation 10 % Appendix VIII

W 14 Peer Evaluation 5 % Appendix XXI

W 14 Final Report 15% Appendix IX

Continuous

Individual Contribution

(Logbook & Meeting, Active

Participation)

10% Appendix X

Total 55 % 40 % 5 %


11/39


Figure 1: Purchase Requisition Flow Chart

6. Submit ETP Claim Breakdown Form and receipts

(hardcopies and softcopies) to ETP Coordinator

7. Collect claims from SV

End

Star t

5. - Arrange original receipts according to sequence in FORM 03- Paste original receipts on A4 papers

(Students are strongly advised to make copy of all receipts)

- Fill up ETP Claim Breakdown Form (App XX)

4. Purchase items

1. - Fill up FORM 03 (App XVI)

- Obtain verification from Lab Executive

Amount

exceed

RM200?

2. Prepare justification letter (App XVIII)

Note: 1. Submission of FORM 03 does not guarantee approval.

2. All deadlines stated are to be complied strictly. Late submissions will not be entertained.

Y

Legend

SV Supervisor

3. - Obtain signature from SV for FORM 03 and justification letter

(if exceed RM200)

- Submit FORM 03 and justification letter to coordinator

Deadline: 15 Nov 2013

N


12/39


Table 2: Explanation to Purchase Requisition Flow Chart.

FlowChartItem #

Description Remarks

1- Fill up FORM 03 (App XVI)- Obtain verification from Lab Executive

- Fill up FORM 03 completely. Refer sample, App XVII. - Obtain verification from Lab Executive on availability ofthe items in UTP.

2- Obtain signature from SV for FORM 03

and justification letter (if exceed RM200)- Prepare justification letter (App XVIII)

- Justification letter is applicable for purchase exceedingRM200. Refer sample, App XIX.

3- Submit FORM 03 and justification letter to

Coordinator (make copy for future reference)

- Incomplete or inaccurate information will result in delay ornon-approval.- Late submissions will not be entertained.

4 Purchase items

- Items purchased must be according to FORM 03 submitted.- If additional items are required, a new FORM 03 must be

submitted to the coordinator.- Claims of additional items not listed in the first FORM 03

will be honoured based on the discretion of coordinator.- Purchases are made using students' own money in advance.

5

- Arrange original receipts according tosequence in FORM 03

- Paste original receipts on A4 papers(Students are strongly advised to make copyof all receipts)- Fill up ETP Claim Breakdown Form(App XX)

- Receipts should be arranged according to sequence inFORM 03.

- All original receipts are to be pasted on A4 papers.- Copies of receipts are to be retained by students.- Fill up App XX completely, including Receipt No. for all

items.

6Submit ETP Claim Breakdown Form andreceipts to Coordinator in both softcopy and

hardcopy forms.

- Late submissions will not be entertained.- Please e-mail the softcopy version as well.

7 Collect claims from SV- Students are responsible to follow up with SV on payment.Please allow some time for payment to reach SV.


13/39


11. LABORATORY

Students are allowed to use the laboratory for the purposes of experiments or fabrications

of their model or prototype. The technicians who are in-charged for the laboratory related

to this course are responsible in co-ordinating the lab operations, which include the Health,

Safety and Environment (HSE) aspects, scheduling of equipment, checking and providing

consumables. Students are required to notify the technicians on their intent to use the labin advance. All lab regulations must be complied. Lab coats and proper attire shall be worn

in the lab. Each group must carry out housekeeping and the technicians will monitor this.Failure to comply with the regulations may result in deduction of marks by the

Coordinators.

12. PLAGIARISM

Plagiarism is strictly prohibited and is a serious offence. Kindly refer to Section 5.1 of the

UTP’s undergraduate handbook, A Guide to University Academic Policies and Procedures.Any work that is found to have been copied or plagiarized will NOT be assessed.

13. WRITING FORMAT FOR FINAL REPORT

The writing format of the ETP final report should follow the UTP standard as described

below. The report consists of many parts arranged in a certain order. It is recommendedthat the contents be in the following order, although not every report will include all the

items listed.

a) Title b) Acknowledgementc) Executive Summary / Abstract

d) Table of Contentse) Background of Project Workf) Identification and Definition of Problemg) Objective and Scopeh) Project Managementi) Literature Review j) Theoryk) Procedure / Methodologyl) Engineering Analysism) Business / Economic Analysisn) Discussion of Results

o) Conclusion p) Recommendationq) Referencesr) Appendices


14/39


General Writing Format

Students must follow specific guidelines for writing the report as stated below.

a) Language

The report must be written in English Language.

b) Font and Spacing

All text should be double-spaced (Times New Roman regular font-style, size 12)

written on one side of each white A4 paper. However, foot note, computer programcodes (must be reduced to font size 8), and captions for tables and figures should

be single-spaced.

c) Length

The report shall not be more than 30 pages, excluding the appendices. Students are

encouraged to be brief and concise in their writing and avoid jargon and passivevoice as much as possible.

d) Numbering

All pages must be numbered in proper sequence from introduction to the end of thereport including pages on figures, tables, computer programs and appendices. Page

numbers appear by themselves and are not to be enclosed in parenthesis, hyphens

or other decorative symbols. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and

centred.

e) Margin

The top, bottom and right margins are 25 mm. The left margin must be 40 mm.

f) Mathematical Text

Mathematical text must be spaced out, superscript and subscript must be clearly

shown as such.

g) Heading

Major headings, such as INTRODUCTION, should be in capitals. Times NewRoman and font size 14 should be used. Secondary headings such as Example, the

first letter should be capitalised, bold and font size 12 should be used, and tertiary

heading should be in Times New Roman.


15/39


h) Tables and Figures

Tables and figures less than a page in size should be inserted into the text near the

point of reference with a three-line space above and below. Tables should be

continuous and not carried over to the succeeding page. Margins’ limits are the

same as text full-page. All tables and figures should be numbered consecutively.

Tables and figures are must be within the main text. Table captions should be positioned at the top middle of each table. The captions for figures should be

positioned at the bottom middle of each figure.

i) References

The method of writing references must follow the standard format. See

Appendix XIV for samples of reference format.

j) Title Page

The title page should be set out in accordance with the Appendix XV and should

include the followings:- name of the group members in FULL complete with the Matrix Number.

- title of the ETP project

- month and year in which the ETP final report is submitted

Students must submit one copy of their ETP final report to the respective supervisor

on week 14.

General Content

This section will elaborate more about the general content needed in each part of the report

format.

a) Title

The project title should reflect the focus on core issues of the research work.

b) Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements should include the names of the contributors to the projectwork including the supervisors and members of the group, preferably not more than

one page.


16/39


c) Summary / Abstract

The summary or abstract briefly covers the content of the work. It should contain

the (i) Objectives of the project; i.e., state the core issue, research question or

objective of the design work, (ii) Methodology; i.e., briefly describe the methods

or techniques used in achieving the objectives, (iii) Results; i.e., describe the results

obtained from the methodology employed, and (iv) Conclusions; i.e., interpretationof the results in relation to the theory or hypotheses. Draw conclusions and state

the implications. The summary or abstract is presented so that any other reader,who is attracted by the title of the project, can know a little more without having to

read the whole report. Any reference to the literature is not made in the abstract but

if such references are necessary, they should be footnoted. Abstract should not bemore than one page.

d) Table of Contents

Table of contents lists all headings and sub-headings, tables, figures, appendices,

bibliography with the page numbers.

e) Background of Project Work

The background covers the research project, the definition of the problem, the

achievement expected from the project, the importance of the project as well as therange and depth of the study.

f) Objective and Scope

The aim of the study includes main/general matter that needs to be achieved orimplemented. Objectives are more detailed and closely related to aim. Scope is the boundary for the research work planned by the students to ensure the feasibility of

the project to be carried out within the given time frame.

g) Project Management

Project management should focus on progress monitoring and task allocation withthe usage of Gantt chart.

h) Literature Review

Literature review includes the review of written materials on the topic and area

chosen. It gives the background of the current studies of the problem area chosen

from various written sources of references. This section reviews the previous

research analytically, critically and objectively.


17/39


i) Theory, Methodology and Procedure

This section shall contain all the relevant theories, hypotheses, facts and data

obtained from references and literature reviews. The theories included must be

relevant with the objectives and the findings of the project, thus allowing the

comparison between the results achieved and the theory to be outstanding. The

methodology must be relevant and used in the project.

j) Engineering Analysis

This section should include data gathering, data analysis, tools required, possible

solutions to problems, decision making on the selected solution and project benefits.

k) Discussion on Result and Findings

This section presents the finding or outcome of the research work. It is suggested

that the results obtained be presented clearly in the form of tables and figures suchas graphs, diagrams or others.

l) Conclusions

Conclusion highlights whether the work completed complies with the set objectiveand the significance of the findings. Recommendation for future work should be

stated in this section to ensure the set objective can be achieved and improved or

even expanded.

m) References

This section is to record all references used for preparing the proposed project. Usethe standard format as given in the appendix.

n) Appendices

Lengthy calculations, figures, raw data, computer programs/source codes, outputs,

etc. are to be enclosed as appendices. They should be titled and numbered accordingto chronological order. Each appendix is preferably named using capital letters and

the appendices need to be listed down in the Table of Contents.


18/39


APPENDIX I: IMPORTANT DATES

Week Number

Activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Seminar I (ETP Briefing) 23/9

Seminar II 30/9

Seminar III 7/10

Project proposal due 13/10

Lab Safety Briefing 14/10

Seminar IV 21/10

Progress Report due 4/11

Submission of Form 03 11/11

Evaluation on Fabrication 25/10

Poster & Product Demo &Presentation assessment(PRESEDEX)

3/12

SEDEX(May & Sep semesters only)

9/12

Submission of ClaimBreakdown form & Receipts

16/12

Submission of PeerEvaluation Form

23/12

Submission of Final Report 23/12

* By co-ordinator: List of students, groups, supervisors and topics

Note: The above schedule is subjected to change. Please check messages in the e-learning regularly for updates.


19/39

APPENDIX II: PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

ETP Group: _______________________________ Project Title: _______________________________

Purpose: The assessment aims to measure the feasibility and suitability of a project to be taken as an ETP project.

Instruction: 1. Assign the appropriate score to each criteria, according to the most fitting description provided.

2. Sum up the total scores for all criteria in the last column.

3. Refer to the score indication table.

Criteria / Score 4 3 2 1 Sc

1. Opportunity for teamwork

development

[to assess suitability of project as

means to inculcate teamwork]

Supports development ofteamwork

Reflects interdependenceand balanced participation

Every member’s role isdefined and understoodby all.

Reasonable opportunityfor development ofteamwork andbalanced participation

Tasks are defined butnot all membersunderstand them

Not much opportunity forteamwork developmentas the tasks are highlysegmented andindependent of eachother

No opportunity forteamwork development

2. Level of technical competence

and capability of the team vis-

à-vis project’s requirement

(such as specialized

knowledge or skill)

The team possesses thenecessary technicalcapability to accomplishthe tasks

The team possessesthe necessary technicalcapability to accomplishthe tasks, however,some additional study

or guidance may beneeded

The team lacks thetechnical capability toaccomplish the tasks andrequires substantialguidance by supervisor

and extensive study

The team does not havethe technical capability toaccomplish the tasks

3. Availability of equipment

required

All equipment required areavailable in UTP

Most of the equipmentare available in UTP

Most of the equipmentrequired are NOTavailable in UTP

All equipment requiredare NOT available in UTP

4. Opportunity to incorporate

creativity, innovativeness andbusiness acumen

High opportunity Moderate opportunity Little opportunity No opportunity


20/39


Criteria / Score 4 3 2 1 Sc

5. Risk in operational safety (e.g.

laser cutting)

Minimal risk Low risk Moderate risk. Mayrequire trained personnel

High risk. Only authorizedand trained personnel(technicians) allowed tooperate / handle projectequipment or materials.

6. Project involves hazardous

materials (e.g. arsenic)

None at all A small amount of

hazardous material,within the capability ofthe labs at UTP

Moderate amount of

hazardous material

Large amount of

hazardous material

7. Time required for project

completion

Can be completed within10 weeks, with somebuffer time

Can be completedwithin 10 weeks, withno buffer time

May face difficulties incompleting within 10weeks

Cannot be completedwithin 10 weeks

8. Project involves

multidisciplinary knowledge

and skills

Involves more than 3engineering fields whichare adequately balanced

Involves 3 engineeringfields, which areadequately balanced

Involves 2 engineeringfields, which areadequately balanced

Involves only 1engineering field

9. Project cost Estimated less thanRM200

Estimated betweenRM200 – RM250

Estimated betweenRM250 – RM300

Estimated more thanRM300

Total Score

Total Score Indication

28 – 36 Project is highly feasible and suitable for ETP

19 – 27 Project is moderately feasible and suitable for ETP. Project requires review to improve on the criteria where the scores are low.

< 19 Project does not meet ETP expectations. It is strongly suggested to modify the topic or change to a more feasible topic.

Supervisor’s Signature: _______________________________

Name: _______________________________Date: _______________________________


21/39

APPENDIX III: PROJECT PROPOSAL SCORE SHEET FORM E1

MCB 3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

Group No Name ID

Supervisor 1.

Title

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Breakdown Guidelines for MarkingMarks

AllocatedMarks

1 Introduction

- Background analysis

- Objective statement- Problem definition- Design approach / methodology

30

2Project planning

- Gantt Chart- Task / work allocation- Project flow showing

involvement of all project

members

30

3Data gathering and

analysis

- Preliminary information(Behaviour trend and analysis)

- Documentation: references /survey / site visit

30

4Compliance to

requirement

- In-time submission- Report complies to

requirement/format10

TOTAL 100

Weightage in course: 10%

_________________________

Supervisor’s signature

Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall forwar d the completed form ( scanned copy) to ETP Coordi nator by th e deadline given.


22/39


APPENDIX IV: PROGRESS REPORT SCORE SHEET FORM E2


Group No Name ID

Supervisor 1.

Title

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


AllocatedMarks

1 Introduction

- Project definition and problem

statement- Identification of potential solutions- Literature review- Design concept- Justification in choosing design

30

2 Project

planning

- Task listing and distribution- Logic of sequence of task- Feasibility of plan

20

3 Methodology- Identification of suitable tools or

software20

4Data gathering

and analysis

- Application of fundamentalengineering knowledge in solving or

analysing design problem- Validity & suitability of data

20

5Economical / business

consideration

- Capital cost considerations- Operational cost considerations- Alternatives in materials

5

6 Conclusion- Summary of progress and findings- Next plan of action

5

TOTAL 100


_________________________


Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall forwar d the completed form (scanned copy) to ETP Coordi nator by th e deadline given.


23/39


24/39


APPENDIX VI: POSTER EVALUATION SHEET FORM E4


Group No

Title

Group Leader ID

Weightage: 10%

________________________ ____________________Examiner’s signature Name & Date

No. Component 4 3 2 1 Marks

1 Clarity of Images All images are in focus.Identifiable 2m away.

Most images are in focusIdentifiable 2m away

Most images are in focusIdentifiable 1m away

Many images are notclear or are too small.

2Originality ofGraphics

The graphics used reflectan exceptional degree ofstudent creativity.

One or two of thegraphics used reflectstudent creativity.

The graphics are madeby the student, but arebased on the designs ofothers.

No graphics made by thestudent are included.

3

Relevance of

Graphics

All graphics relevant.

All borrowed graphicshave a source citation.

Most graphics relevant.

All borrowed graphicshave a source citation.

Most graphics irrelevant.

Most borrowed graphicshave a source citation.

All graphics not relevant.

Most borrowed graphicswithout a source citation.

4OverallComposition:Figures, text, background.

Creatively composed.Suitable choice of colors.

Creatively composed. Satisfactorily composed Messy and distracting

5Accuracy ofContent / Facts

Over 90% accurate

Citation provided

Up to 70% accurate

Citation provided

Up to 50% accurate

Citation provided

Less than 50% accurate

Citation not provided

6Introduction:Problem statement,background & objective.

Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all

7 Methodology Clear & concise Satisfactory but lengthy Unclear No description at all

8Results &Conclusions


9Business/EconomicConsiderations


10 Texts & GrammarSuitable text sizes

No grammatical errors

Suitable text sizes

Some grammatical errors

Unsuitable text sizes

Some grammatical errors

Unsuitable text sizes

Many grammatical errors

Total (Max = 40)


25/39


APPENDIX VII: DEMONSTRATION OF WORKING PROTOTYPE/MODEL FORM E5


Group No

Title

THEMEGroup Leader ID

Weightage: 20%

RECOMMENDED FOR SEDEX? YES / NO



1 Level of Creativity

High:Excellent new andpractical idea that canbring extreme benefits tosociety

Substantial:New and practical ideathat can bring benefits tosociety

IncrementalPractical idea that canbring benefits to society

Operational:Repeating ideas andexisting procedures withlittle team input into theideas behind the project

2 Level of Innovation

Radical orBreakthrough:The work tackles a newmethodology to achievethe same function, andcould lead to a new

avenue of researchE.g. Using bioenergy ofhuman rider as powersource for bicycles

Substantial:The work is furtherapplied research,tackling a newmethod/material toachieve an existing

subfunctionE.g. The fabrication of aracing bicycle sub frameusing bamboo

Incremental:The work is appliedresearch, looking atsimple improvement ofan existing concept ordesign

E.g. Rear sensors on abicycle to warn riders ofimminent collision

Data Gathering:The work is purelynumber-crunching, withlittle associated noveltyE.g. measurement of

stress in bicycle spokesduring typical loadingcycle during cycling.

3Completion ofprototype

100 % 90 – 99 % 80 – 89 % < 80%

4Aesthetics &Finishing quality

Excellent geometry andassembly. Attractive colorand overall look. Cuttingsare very neat. Excellent

jointing

Attractive color andoverall look. Neatassembly. Cuttings arequite neat.Proper jointing.

Proper color chosen.Neat assembly.Poor cuttings.Satisfactory jointing

Poor overall look andcolor. Poor assemblyPoor cuttings.Poor jointing.

5Structure ofPrototype

Excellently rigid structure.Satisfactorily rigidstructure

Marginally stablestructure

Unstable structure.

6 Materials Appropriate materialswere carefully selectedbased on scientific facts.

Materials were selectedbased on scientific facts.

Materials were partlyselected based onscientific facts.

Inappropriate materialswere selected.

7Testing &Measurements

Clear evidence.Data taken several timesin a careful, reliablemanner.

Sufficient evidence.Data taken twice in acareful, reliable manner.

Some evidence.Data taken once in acareful, reliable manner.

Data not taken in areliable manner.

8

Understanding ofscientific principlesunderlying thefabrication/product

Members havecompletely clear andaccurate understanding

Members understandmost

Members have littleunderstanding

Members generally DIDNOT understand

9

Functionality /Ability toimplement thedesired task

Functions extraordinarilywell. 100%implementation

Functions well.90 – 99 %implementation

Functions pretty well, butwith minor defects80 – 89 %implementation

Major flaws in function.< 80% implementation

10 Demonstration skill Highly convincing Quite convincing Quite dubious Highly dubious

Total (Max = 40)


26/39


APPENDIX VIII: ORAL PRESENTATION: GROUP ASSESSMENT FORM E6


Group No

Title

Group Leader ID

Weightage: 10%



1Clarity ofPresentation

Very clear Quite clear Quite vague Very vague

2Sequence & TimeLimit

Logical sequence.Good continuityCompliance to time limit.

Logical sequence. Acceptable continuityExceed the time limit.

Acceptable continuityExceed the time limit.

Poor continuity.Exceed the time limit.

3Composition ofSlides

Very Good Good Marginal Poor

4Visual Aids(drawings & illustrations)

SuitableHigh quality

Adequate

Reasonable quality Adequate

Reasonable qualityInadequate

Low qualityInadequate

5Introduction(Background, problemstatement and objective)

Very clear Quite clear Quite vague Very vague

6Literature Review /Data Gathering

Highly adequate andrelevant

Adequate Marginal Poor

7 MethodologyJustified design selection

Adequate engineeringanalysis

Questionable designselection

Adequate engineeringanalysis

No design selectionSome engineeringanalysis

No design selectionMinimal engineeringanalysis

8 Project Planning Good work flowGood schedulingProper task distribution

Reasonable work flowProper schedulingProper task distribution

Quite poor work flowProper schedulingProper task distribution

Poor work flowPoor schedulingImproper task distribution

9Results &Discussions

Prototype well tested.Good discussions onresults.Business/Economicconsiderations

Prototype tested.Reasonable discussionson results

Prototype tested.Inadequate discussionson results

Prototype not tested.Minimal discussions.

10Conclusion &Recommendations

Highly convincing Quite convincing Quite dubious Highly dubious

Total (Max = 40)


27/39


APPENDIX IX: FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FORM E8

MCB3053 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

Group No Name ID Prog.

Supervisor

Title


AllocatedMarks

1 Layout and

presentability

- Summary- Table of contents

- Appendices (compilation of relevantinformation)

10

2 Introduction - Background of project work- Objective- Problem definition and identification- Literature review

20

3 Procedure andanalysis

- Approach to solutions / methodology- Fundamental engineering analysis

20

4 Results - Technical specification and engineeringdrawing

- Project output

- Discussion on result- Conclusion- Recommendations

40

5Project

management

- Progress monitoring (Gantt Chart)- Task allocation

10

TOTAL 100

/ 15


_________________________Supervisor’s signature

Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall forwar d the completed form ( scanned copy) to ETP Coordi nator by th e deadline given.


28/39


APPENDIX X: CALCULATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION (IC) FORM E9


Group No

Supervisor

Title

No

Name IDWeek 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 LB

5%MP5%

IC(10%

LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP

1

2

3

4

5

Logbook marking guidelines (LB)

Criteria Score

Submit & Complete all tasks 0.9-1Submit & Complete most tasks 0.8-0.9

Submit & Complete few tasks 0.1-0.8

No submission (w/o reason) 0

Meeting & Participation marking guidelines (MP)

Criteria Score

Come on time & active 0.8-1Come on time & less active 0.7-0.8

Late & active 0.5-0.7

Late & less active 0.1-0.5

Absent (w/o reason) 0

______________________


Date: ____________________ Weightage: 10%

CALCULATION OF IC (EXAMPLE)

No

Name IDWeek 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 LB

5%MP5%

IC(10%

LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP LB MP

1 Ali 1234 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0,8 0.9 0.8 4.3 4.1 8.4


29/39


APPENDIX XI: RESULT COMPILATION FORM E10


Group No

Supervisor

Title

SUPERVISOR OTHER EXAMINERS

No IDStudentName Prog.

Proj.Prop.

Prog.Rpt. Fab.

FinalRpt IC

Subtotal1 Poster Demo

GrpOral

Subtotal2

PeerEval T

10% 10% 10% 15% 10% 55% 15% 10% 10% 40% 5% 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

ASSESSMENT FOR EACH STUDENT (EXAMPLE)

SUPERVISOR OTHER EXAMINERS

No ID Student Name Prog.Proj.Prop.

Prog.Rpt. Fab.

FinalRpt IC

Subtotal1 Poster Demo

GrpOral

Subtotal2 To

10% 10% 10% 15% 10% 55% 10% 20% 10% 40% 100

1 XXXX STUDENT 1 CH 8 7.9 8.1 12 9 45 8 15 9.0 32 7

2 XXXX STUDENT 2 CH 8 7.9 8.1 12 8.7 44.7 8 15 9.0 32 76

3 XXXX STUDENT 3 CV 8 7.9 8.1 12 7.9 43.9 8 15 9.0 32 75

4 XXXX STUDENT 4 EE 8 7.9 8.1 12 9 45 8 15 9.0 32 7

5 XXXX STUDENT 5 ME 8 7.9 8.1 12 8 44 8 15 9.0 32 7

Note: Supervisors shall forward the completed form (scanned copy) to ETP Coordinator by the deadline given.


30/39


APPENDIX XII: LOGBOOK SUMMARY FORM E11


Group No Week No

SupervisorTitle

Student Name ID

Completed Activities (from last week)

Planned Activities (for next week)

Overall group progress vs. Gantt Chart:

Problems encountered:

Note: 1) Maximum 2 pages only

2) Supervisor needs to verify each student’s activities during the weekly meeting.

_______________________


Date: ____________________Note: Supervisors shall retain the forms for two consecutive years.


31/39


APPENDIX XIII: PROJECT PROPOSAL CONTENT

The project proposal must have the followings at minimum:

Details of the Project Team (front page)

Short Summary/Abstract

Problem Statement

Project Objectives

Background Study

Design Approach/MethodologyProceduresPlan and Schematic Flow Process of the ProjectHardware/Tools and Software

Project ManagementTask Allocation and Activities

Schedule/Gantt Chart

Group NumberProject:

Matric Number

Team LeaderMember

Member

…


32/39


APPENDIX XIV: SAMPLE OF REFERENCING FORMAT

The format of references for the respective sources is as follows:

1. journal refer to Meguid and Zhu (1995)

2. book refer to Glister P. (1993) 3. book in series refer to Ochoa, O.O and Reddy, J.N. (1989) 4. article in book/conference proceedings refer to Eskey, D and Grabe, W. (1988) 5. thesis refer to Mohd Shariff, A. (1995) 6. interview refer to Hamouda, A.M.S. (1994) 7. website refer to Duncan, Donna. (1998)

Meguid, S.A. and Zhu, Z.H., 1995, "A novel finite element for treating inhomogeneous solids,"

International Journal Numerical Methods Eng ineering 38 (2): 1579-1592

Glister P. 1993, The Internet Navigator, New York, John Wiley & Sons

Eskey, D and Grabe, W. 1988, "Interactive models for second language reading" in

P. Carrell, J. Devine and D. Eskey (Eds) Interactive approaches to Second Language Reading ,

Cambridge; Cambridge University Press

Hitam, P., 1995, Fundamental Study of X-111 Soil Characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi

PETRONAS, Malaysia.

Hamouda, A.M.S. 1994. LUSAS Ltd., UK, Private communication.

Websites (with author):

Author, Year, Title, Date accessed, from URL

Duncan, D. M., 2008, How to Eat Humble Pie, 6 Sept 2009, from http://www.geovillage.com

Websites (without author):

Title, Year, Date accessed, from URL


33/39


APPENDIX XV: SAMPLE OF COVER PAGE FOR FINAL REPORT

ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

TI TLE OF PROJECT

BY

GROUP NUMBER

Member 1 ( Matric Number)


Member 3 ( Matric Number)Member 4 ( Matric Number)



Supervisor:

January 2030

Universiti Teknologi PetronasBandar Seri Iskandar

31750 Tronoh,


34/39


Perak Darul Ridzuan

APPENDIX XVI: STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM FORM 03

Student's Name Student's ID

E-mail Address Contact No

ETP Group No Date

Project Title

Note: The cost of preparing project reports and posters including photocopying and stationeries are to be borne by the students

themselves.

No. Item Brand & Model

Dimension (L X W X H)/

description / material /specification

Vendor /

supplier

Unit

Price(RM) Qty

Amount

(RM)

Total

Verified by:(Lab Executive)

Certified by:(Project Supervisor)

Endorsed by:(ETP Coordinator)

Approved by:(Programme Head)

Signature

OfficialStamp


35/39


Date

APPENDIX XVII: STUDENTS’ REQUISITION FORM - SAMPLE FORM 03

Student's Name Suhana Bt Ramli Student's ID 12345

E-mail Address [email protected] Contact No 012-345 6789

ETP Group No 91 Date 14 Feb 2008

Project Title Electron X – provide brief description

Note: The cost of preparing project reports and posters including photocopying and stationeries are to be borne by the students

themselves.

No. Item Brand & Model

Dimension (L X W X H)/

description / material /specification

Vendor /

supplier

Unit

Price(RM) Qty

Amount

(RM)

1 Photovoltaic module Kyocera 120 X 10 X 10 mm / 250W Sunny Boy 88.90 1 88.90

2 Inductor Sumida CDH53 68 uH 1.5Arms 0.18DCR Xcel Circuit 63.50 1 63.50

3 Padding N/A 50 X 11 X 6 mm / rubber Eng Huat 5.00 6 30.00

4 Dividers N/A 3" X 6" sheet metal / steel Eng Huat 8.50 3 25.50

5 Spray paint Net Paint 1 liter / Oil-based paint Eng Huat 10.00 2 20.00

6 Galvanised washers N/A 3/8" / steel Eng Huat 3.50 4 14.00

7 Ply wood N/A 100 X 80 X 6 mm / wood Eng Huat 12.80 1 12.80

8 Hinges N/A 30 X 90 mm / brass Eng Huat 2.00 2 4.00

Total 258.70

Verified by:(Lab Executive)

Certified by:(Project Supervisor)

Endorsed by:(ETP Coordinator)

Approved by:(Programme Head)

Signature

Official

Stamp

Date


36/39


APPENDIX XVIII: JUSTIFICATION LETTER

MBB3013 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

To : AP Ir Dr Masri bin Baharom

Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering

From :

ETP Group No Contact :

CC (Supervisor) : Date :

Dear Sir,

RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASE EXCEEDING ETP BUDGET

Referring to the above, we wish to request your approval to allow purchases more than RM200 for our ETP project. The table

below shows the list of items to be purchased, in descending order of price and corresponding justifications or supporting remarks.

No ItemPrice

(RM) Supplier

Is there any

cheaper

alternative

source?

Justifications / supporting remarks

Total

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours sincerely, Endorsed by (Supervisor ):

___ _____________ ___ _____________

Decision: tick ( )

Sign: __________________________ Date: __________________________

Remarks (if any): ______________________________________________________________________________

Approved Not Approved


37/39


APPENDIX XIX: JUSTIFICATION LETTER - SAMPLE

MAB/MBB 3013 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

To : Dr. Masri B Baharom

Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering

From : Suhana Bt Ramli

ETP Group No 88 Contact : 012 – 345 6789

CC (Supervisor) : Dr Mohd Jefri Date : 14 Feb 2008

Dear Sir,

RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASE EXCEEDING ETP BUDGET

Referring to the above, we wish to request your approval to allow purchases more than RM200 for our ETP project. The table

below shows the list of items to be purchased, in descending order of price and corresponding justifications or supporting remarks.

No ItemPrice

(RM) Supplier

Is there any

cheaper

alternative

source?

Justifications / supporting remarks

1 Photovoltaicmodule

88.90Sunny

Boy No

There is only one sole supplier (Sunny Boy) in

Malaysia.

2

Inductor 63.50Xcel

Circuit No

Three quotations were obtained (RM77.50,

RM72.00 and RM63.50) and Xcel Circuit provided

the lowest price based on the same specification.

3 Padding 30.00

Eng Huat

For Items #3 - #8, Eng Huat is selected as the

location is near UTP, it has a complete range of

products meeting the specifications, hence is

convenient and helps reduce traveling time and

cost.

4 Dividers 25.50

5 Spray paint 20.00

6 Galvanised

washers14.00

7 Ply wood 12.808 Hinges 4.00

Total 258.70

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours sincerely, Endorsed by (Supervisor ):

___(Signature) _____________ ___(Signature) _____________

Decision: tick ( )

Sign: __________________________ Date: __________________________

Remarks (if any): ______________________________________________________________________________

Approved Not Approved


38/39


APPENDIX XX: ETP CLAIM BREAKDOWN FORM

MAB/MBB 3013 – ENGINEERING TEAM PROJECT

PREPARED BY

Student's Name Student's ID

E-mail Address Contact No

ETP Group No Date

Project Title (Refer Finance Reference from UTP Claim Form)

Please attach the completely endorsed Form UTP 03 and all the receipts.

Please use additional pages if necessary.

No. ItemDimension (L x W x H)/ description / material /

specificationReceipt No. Qty Amount

Total

Prepared by,

___________________________


39/39

APPENDIX XXI: PEER EVALUATION TEMPLATE

Peer Evaluation : Engineering Team Project ETP GRP:

Student to be evaluated

Name: ID:

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 ScoreContributions Routinely provides

useful ideas whenparticipating in the groupwork and discussion. Adefinite leader ormember who contributesa lot of effort.

Usually provides usefulideas when participating inthe group work anddiscussion. A strong groupmember who tries hard!

Sometimes providesuseful ideas whenparticipating in groupwork and discussion. Asatisfactory groupmember who does whatis required.

Rarely provides usefulideas when participatingin group work anddiscussion. May refuseto participate.

Quality ofWork

Provides work of thehighest quality.

Provides high qualitywork.

Provides work thatoccasionally needs tobe checked/redone byother group members toensure quality.

Provides work thatusually needs to bechecked/redone byothers to ensure quality.

Time-management

Routinely uses time wellthroughout the project toensure things get doneon time. Group does nothave to adjust deadlinesor work responsibilitiesbecause of this person'sprocrastination.

Usually uses time wellthroughout the project, butmay have procrastinatedon one thing. Group doesnot have to adjustdeadlines or workresponsibilities because ofthis person'sprocrastination.

Tends to procrastinate,but always gets thingsdone by the deadlines.Group does not have toadjust deadlines orwork responsibilitiesbecause of thisperson'sprocrastination.

Rarely gets things doneby the deadlines ANDgroup has to adjustdeadlines or workresponsibilities becauseof this person'sinadequate timemanagement.

Problem-solving

Actively looks for andsuggests solutions toproblems.

Refines solutionssuggested by others.

Does not suggest orrefine solutions, but iswilling to try outsolutions suggested byothers.

Does not try to solveproblems or help otherssolve problems. Letothers do the work.

Attitude Always has a positiveattitude about the

task(s). Never is publiclycritical of the project orthe work of others.

Often has a positiveattitude about the task(s).

Rarely is publicly critical ofthe project or the work ofothers.

Usually has a positiveattitude about the

task(s). Occasionally ispublicly critical of theproject or the work ofother members of thegroup.

Often has a negativeattitude about the

task(s). Often is publiclycritical of the project orthe work of othermembers of the group.

Reliability Consistently staysfocused on the task andwhat needs to be done.Very self-directed.

Focuses on the task andwhat needs to be donemost of the time. Othergroup members can counton this person.

Focuses on the taskand what needs to bedone some of the time.Other group membersmust sometimes nag,prod, and remind tokeep this person on-task.

Rarely focuses on thetask and what needs tobe done. Lets others dothe work.

TOTAL

Adapted from: http://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.html
http://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.htmlhttp://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.htmlhttp://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.htmlhttp://coe.nevada.edu/slefevre/grouprubric.html

etp guideline (september 2015)

Documents