eu gmp vol 4 nov 2008
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
1/16
***
*,
**
**
***
EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRCTORATE-GENERAL
Consumer
goods
Pharmaceutcals
Brussels,
2-5
November 2008 (rev.)
Eudralex
The Rules
Governing
Medicinal
Products
in
the
European
Union
Volume 4
EU
Guidelines to
Good
Manufacturing
Practice
Medicinal Products for Human
and
Veterinary Use
Annex
I
Manufacture of
Sterile
Medicinal
Products
(corrected
versionl
Please
note
correction on the
implementation
of
provisions
for
capping of
vials
1
Note:
Provisions
on
capping of
vials should be
implemented
by
0l March
20I0.
Document
History
Previous version dated 30 May 2003, in operation
since
Septernber
2003
Revision to align classification
table
of clean rooms, to
include
guidance
on media simultations, bioburden
monitoring and
capping
of
vials
November
2005 to
Decernber
2007
Date
for
coming
into
operation
and superseding
01 March 2009'
Commission Europenne,
B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie,
B-1
049 Brussel
-
Belgium- Telephone:
(32-2)
299 11
11
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
2/16
ANNEX
1
MANUFACTURE
OF STERILE
MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
Principle
The manufacture
of sterile
products
is
subject
to special
requirements
in
order
to minimize
risks
of microbiological
contamination,
and
of
partculate
and
pyrogen
contamination.
Much
depends
on
the
skill, training
and attitudes
of
the
personnel
involved.
Quality
Assurance
is
particularly
important,
and
this
type of
manufacture
must
strictly
follow
carefully established
and validated methods
of
preparation
and
procedure.
Sole
reliance
for
sterility or other
quality
aspects
must not be
placed
on
any
terminal
process
or
finished
product
tesl.
Note:
This
guidance
does
not lay
down
detailed
methods for determining the
rnicrobiological
and
particulate
cleanliness
of
air, surfaces
etc.
Reference
should
be
made to
other
documents such
as
the EN/ISO
Standards.
General
I
-
The
manufacture
of
sterile products should be carried
out
in
clean
areas
entry
to
which
should be through airlocks
for
personnel
and/o
for
equipment and materials. Clean
areas
should be
maintained
to
an appropriate
cleanliness standard and
supplied
with air which
has
passed
through
filters
ofan
appropriate
efficiency.
2.The
various
operations of
component
preparation, product
preparation
and
filling
should
be
carried out
in
separate areas within
the clean area,
Manufacturing
operations
are divided
into
two
categories,
firstly
those
where the
product
is
terminally sterilised,
and secondly
those
which
are
conducted aseptically
at some or all
stages.
3.
Clean
areas
for the manufacture
of
sterile
products
are
classified
according
to
the
required
characteristics
of the enviroument.
Each manufacturing
operation
requires
an
appropriate
environmental
cleanliness
level
in
the
operational
state
in
order
to
minimise the risks
of
particulate
or
microbial
contamination
of the
product
or
materials being
handled.
In order
to
meet
"in
operation"
conditions
these
areas
should
be
designed
to
reach
certain
specified
ai-cleanliness
levels
in
the
"at
rest"
occupancy
state.
The
"at-rest"
state
is the
condition where
the
installation
is installed and operating, complete
with
production
equipment but
with
no operating
personnel present.
The
"in
operation" state
is
the
condition
where the installation
is
functioning in
the
defined operating
mode
with
the specified
number
of
personnel
working.
The
"in
operation" and
"at
rest"
states
should be defined
for
each clean
room or
suite
ofclean
rooms.
For
the
manufacture
of
sterile
medicinal
products
4
grades
can
be distinguished.
Grade
A:
The local zone for high risk operations, e.g.
filling zone,
stopper
bowls,
open
ampoules and vials,
making
aseptic
connections.
Normally
such conditions
are
provided
by a
laminar
air
flow
work
station.
Laminar air
flow
systems should
provide
a
homogeneous
air
speed
in
a
range
of
0.36
-
0.54 m/s
(guidance
value)
at the
working
position
in open clean
room
applications.
The
maintenance of
laminarty should be demonstrated
and
validated.
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
3/16
A
uni-directional air
flow
and
lower velocites
may
be used
in
closed
isolators
and
glove
boxes.
Grade
B: For
aseptic
preparation
and
filling, this
is
the
background
environment
for the
grade
A zone.
Grade
C and
D:
Clean
areas for
carrying
out
less
critical stages
in
the
manufacture
of
sterile
products.
Clean
room
and
clean
air device classification
4.
Clean
roorns
and
clean air devices
should
be classified
in accordance
with
EN
ISO
14644-
l. Classification should
be clearly differentiated
from operational
process
environmental
monitoring.
The maximum
permitted
airborne
particle
concentration
for
each
grade is
given
in
the
following
table.
5.
For
classification
purposes
in
Grade
A zones,
a
minimum sample
volume
of
lmt should
be
taken
per
sample
location.
For
Grade
A
the airbome
particle
classification
is ISO
4.8
dictated
by
the
limit for
particles
15.0
rm.
For Grade
B
(at
rest) the airborne
particle
classification
is
ISO 5 for
both
considered
particle
sizes. .
For
Grade
C
(at
rest &
in
operation)
the
airborne
particle
classification
is ISO
7
and
ISO I
respectively.
For
Grade
D
(at
rest) the
airborne
particle classification
is
ISO
8.
For
classifcation
purposes
EN/ISO
14644-l
methodology
defines
both the
minimum
number
of sarnple
locations
and the
sample size
based
on
the
class
limit of the
largest considered
particle
size and
the
method of
evaluation
of
the
data
collected.
6. Portable
particle
counters
with a short
length of sample
tubing
should
be
used
for
classification
purposes
because
of
the
relatively higher
rate
of
precipitation of
paficles
>5.0pm
in
remote
sampling
systems
with
long lengths
of
tubing.
Isokinetic
sample
heads
shall
be used
in
unidirectional
airflow systems.
7.
"ln
operation" classification
may
be
demonstrated
during
normal operations,
simulated
operations
or during
media
fills
as
worst-case
simulation
is
required
for
this.
EN
ISO
14644-2
provides information
on
testing
to
demonstrate
continued compliance
with
the
assigned
cleanliness classif,rcations.
Clean
room and clean air device
monitoring
8.
Clean
rooms and clean
air
devices
should be
routinely
monitored
in
operation
and
monitoring locations based on
a
formal
risk
analysis
study
and the
results obtained
during
classification
of
rooms
and/or
clean air devices.
9.
For
Grade
A
zones,
particle
monitoring
should
be
undertaken
for the
full
duration
of critical
processing,
including
equipment
assembly,
except where
justified
by
contaminants
in
the
the
the
Maximum
permitted
number of
particles
per m'
equal
to or
greater
than
the tabulated size
At
rest
ln operation
Grade
0.5
pm 5.0um
0.5
pm
5.0.rm
A
3
520 20
3
520
20
B
3 520
29
352 000
2900
C
352 000
2900
3 520 000
29
000
D
3
520 000
29 000 Not dehned
Not
defined
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
4/16
process
that would damage
the
particle
counter
or
present
a
hazard,
e.g.
live
organisms
and
radiological hazards. In
such
cases monitoring during
routine
equipment set
up
operations
should be undertaken
prior
to
exposure
to
the
risk. Monitoring during
simulated
operations
should also be
performed.
The
Grade
A zone should be monitored
at
such a
frequency
and
with suitable sample size that all
intenentions, transient events and
any
system deterioration
would be
captured
and
alarms triggered
if
alert
lirnits
are
exceeded.
It
is
accepted
that
it
may
not
always
be
possible
to
demonstrate
low
levels of
5.0
pm
particles
at
the
point
of fill when
filling
is
in progress,
due
to
the generation
of particles or droplets from
the
product itself.
10.
It
is recommended that a similar system be used
for
Grade
B zones
although the sample
frequency may
be
decreased.
The
importance
of the
particle
monitoring
system should
be
determined by
the effectiveness
of the segregation between the adiacent Grade
A
and
B
zones.
The
Grade
B
zone
should
be monitoed at such
a frequency and with
suitable sample size that
changes
in levels
of
contamination and any system deterioration would be
captured
and
alarms
triggered
if
alert
limits are exceeded.
I
l.
Airborne
particle
monitoring
systems
may consist
of
independent
particle
counters;
a
nefwork
of
sequentially
accessed sampling
points
connected by manifold to a single
particle
counter; or
a
combinaton of the two.
The
system selected
must
be
appropriate
for
the
particle
size
considered.
Where remote sampling
systems are used,
the length
of
tubing
and
the
radii
of any bends
in
the tubing
must
be
considered
in
the
context
of
particle
losses
in
the
tubing.
The
selection of the
monitoring
system should take account of
any
risk
presented
by the
materials
used
in
the
manufacturing operation,
for
example those involving
live
organisms
or
radiopharmaceuticals.
12.The
sample sizes
taken
for monitoring
purposes
using
automated systems
will
usually
be a
fi"urction of
the sampling
rate
of
the system used.
It
is not necessary for the sample
volume
to
be the
same as
that used
for formal
classification
of clean
rooms
and clean air devices.
13.
In
Grade
A
and
B zones,
the
monitoring
of the
>5.0
rm
particle
concentration count
takes
on a
particular
signif,rcance
as
it
is
an important diagnostic tool
for
early detection of
failure.
The occasional indication
of
>5.0
rm
particle
counts
may
be
false
counts
due
to
electronic
noise,
stray
light,
coincidence, etc.
However
consecutive
or
regular
counting of
low
levels is
an
indicator of a
possible
contamination event
and should
be
investigated.
Such
events
may indicate
early
failure
of
the
IIVAC
system,
filling
equipment
failure
or
may
also
be diagnostic
of
poor practices
during
machine
set-up and
routine
operation.
14.
The
particle
limits
given
in
the table
for
the
"at
rest"
state should
be
achieved
after a
short
"clean
up"
period
of
15-20 minutes
(guidance
value)
in
an
unmanned state after
completion
of operations.
15. The monitoring
of
Grade C and
D
areas
in
operation should be
performed
in
accordance
with
the
principles
of
quality
risk
management. The requirements
and alerlaction
limits
will
depend
on the
nature
of
the operations carried out,
but
the
recommended
"clean up period"
should
be
attained.
I6.
Other
characteristics
such as temperature and
relative humidity
depend
on
the
product
and
nature
of the
operations
caried out.
These
parameters
should
not interfere with
the defined
cleanliness
standard.
17.
Examples
of
operations to be carried out
in the various
grades
are
given
in
the table below
(see
also
paragraphs
28
to
35):
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
5/16
Grade
Examples
of operations
for
terminally
sterilised
products.
(see
paragraphs
28-
30)
A Filling
of
products,
when unusually
at
risk
C
Preparation
of solutions. when unusuallv
at
risk.
Filline
of
nroducts
D
Preparation
of solutions
and
comnonents for
subseouent
fillinc
Grade Examnles of ooerations
for
asentic
nrenarations.
lsee
narasranhs.
31-35)
A
Aseotic
preparation
and
fillins.
C
Preparation
of
solutions to
be
hltered.
D Handlins
of comoonents
after
washins.
18. Where
aseptic
operations are
performed
monitoring
should
be
frequent
using
methods
such as settle
plates,
volumetric
air and surface
sampling
(e.g-
swabs and
contact
plates).
Sampling
methods
used
in
operation should
not
interfere with
zone
protection. Results
from
monitoring
should be considered when
reviewing
batch documentation
for finished
product
release.
Surfaces
and
personnel
should be monitored
after
critical operations.
Additional
microbiological
monitoring
is also
required
outside
production
operations,
e.g.
after
validation of
systems, cleaning and sanitisation.
19.
Recommended
limits
for
microbiological monitoring of clean
areas
during
operation:
Notes
(a)
These
are average values.
(b)
Individual
settle
plates
may
be exposed
for
less
than
4
hours.
20. Appropriate
alert
and action
limits
should
be
set
for
the
results of
particulate
and
microbiological monitoring. If these
limits
are
exceeded
operating
procedures
should
prescribe
corrective
action.
Isolator technology
21.
The
utilisation of
isolator
technology to
minimize human
interventions
in
processing
areas
may
result in
a
significant
decrease
in
the risk
of
microbiological
contamination
of aseptically
manufactued
products
from
the
environment. There
are
rnany
possible
designs
of
isolators
and
transfer devices,
The isolator
and the background
environrnent
should be
designed
so
that
the
required
air
quality
for
the
respective
zones
can
be
realised.
Isolators are constructed
of
various
materials more
or
less prone
to
puncfure
and leakage.
Transfer
devices
may
vary
from
a single door to double door designs to
fully
sealed systems
incorporating
sterilisation
mechanisms-
Recommended
limits
for
microbial
contamination
(a)
Grade air sample
cfu/m3
setfle
plates
(diameter
90
mm)
cfu/4
hours
(b)
contact
plates
(diarneter
55
mm)
cfir/plate
glove
print
-5
fingers
cfu/glove
A
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
6/16
22.The
transfer of
materials into
and out of
the
unit
is
one
of
the
greatest
potential
sources
of
contamination.
ln
general
the
area
inside the isolator
is
the
local zone
for high
risk
manipulations,
although
it
is
recognised that laminar
ai
flow
may
not
exist
in
the working
zone
ofall such devices.
23.The
air classification
required
for
the background
environment
depends
on
the
design
of
the isolator
and
its
application.
It
should be
controlled
and
for
aseptic
processing
it
should
be
at least
grade
D.
24. Isolators should be
introduced
only after appropriate
validation. Validation should
take
into
account
all
critical
factors
of
isolator
technology,
for
example
the
quality
of the air
inside
and outside
(backgroturd)
the
isolator,
sanitisation of the
isolator, the iransfer
process
and
isolator
integrity.
2-5. Monitoring
should
be
carried out
routinely and
should
include frequent leak testing
of
the
isolator
and
glove/sleeve
system.
Blow/filUseal
techno
logy
26. Blowlftll/seal
units are
purpose
built
machines
in
which, in one continuous
operation,
containers are
formed
from
a
thermoplastic granulate,
filled
and
then
sealed,
all
by
the
one
automatic
machine. Blow/fill/seal
equipment used
for aseptic
production
which
is fitted with
an
effective
grade
A
air
shower
may
be
installed
in
at
least
a
grade
C environment,
provided
that
grade
A/B
clothing
is
used.
The
environment should
comply with the
viable
and
non
viable
limits
at
rest
and the viable
limit
only
when
in
operation.
Blow/fill/seal
equipment
used
for
the
production
of
products
which
are
terminally
sterilised should
be
installed
in
at
least a
grade
D
environment.
27.
Because
of this special
technology
particular
attention
should
be
paid
to,
at
least the
following:
.
equipment
design and
qualification
o
validation
and
reproducibility of
cleaning-in-place
and
sterilisation-in-place
.
background clean
room environment
in
which the
equipment
is
located
.
operator training and
clothing
o
interventions in
the
critical
zone
of
the equipment
including
any aseptic
assembly
prior
to the commencement of
filling.
Tenninally sterilised
products
28. Preparation
of components
and
most
products
should be done
in
at
least
a
grade
D
environment
in order to
give
low
risk
of
microbial
and
particulate
contamination, suitable
for
filtration
and
sterilisation. Where the
product
is
at a
high
or
unusual risk of
microbial
contamination,
(for
example, because the
product
actively supports
microbial
growth
or
must
be
held for
a
long
period
before
sterilisation or
is
necessarily
processed
not
mainly in
closed
vessels),
then
preparation
should be
carried out in
a
grade
C environment.
29. Filling of
products
for
terminal sterilisation should be carried
out
in at
least
a
grade
C
environment.
30. Where
the
product
is
at
unusual
risk
of
contamination
from
the
environment,
for
example
because
the
filling
operation
is
slow or the
containers ae
wide-necked or are
necessarily
exposed
for
more
than a
few
seconds
before sealing, the
filling
should
be
done
in
a
grade
A
zone
with
at
least
a
grade
C background.
Preparation
and
frlling
of
ointments, creams,
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
7/16
suspensions
and emulsions should
generally
be carried
out
in
a
grade
C
environment
before
terminal
sterilisation.
Aseptic
preparation
31. Components after
washing
should
be
handled in at
least
a
grade
D
environment.
Handling
of
sterile starting
materials
and
components,
unless
subjected
to sterilisation
or
filtration
through
a
micro-organism-retaining filter
later in
the
process,
should
be done
in a
grade
A
environment
with
grade
B
background.
32.Preparation
of
solutions
which are
to
be sterile
filtered
during
the
process
should
be
done
in
a
grade
C environment;
if not fltered, the
preparation
of
materials
and
products
should
be
done
in
a
grade
A
environment
with a
gtade
B
background.
33. Handling and
filling
of aseptically
prepared
products
should
be done
in
a
grade
A
environment
with
a
grade
B
background.
34.
Prior
to the completion
of
stoppering,
transfer
of
partially
closed
containers,
as
used
in
freeze
drying
should
be done
either
in
a
grade
A
environment
with
grade
B
background
or
in
sealed
transfer trays
in
a
grade
B
environment.
35. Preparation and
filling
of
sterile ointments,
creams,
suspensions
and
emulsions
should
be
done
in
a
grade
A
environment,
with
a
grade
B
background,
when the
product
is
exposed
and
is
not
subsequently
filtered.
Personnel
36. Only the
minimun number
of
personnel
required
should
be
present
in
clean areas;
this
is
particularly
important
during
aseptic
processing.
Inspections
and controls
should
be
conducted outside the clean
areas
as far as
possible.
37. All
personnel
(including
those concerned
with cleaning
and
maintenance) ernployed
in
such
areas
should receive regular
training in
disciplines relevant to the correct manufacture
of
sterile
products.
This training should
include
reference to
hygiene and
to the basic
elements
of
microbiology. When
outside
staff
who
have
not received such
training
(e.g.
building
or
maintenance contractors)
need
to be brought
in,
particular
care should
be taken
over
their
instruction
and supervision.
38. Staff who
have
been engaged
in the
processing
of animal
tissue
materials
or
of
cultures of
micro-organisms other than
those used
in
the
current
manufacturing
process
should
not
enter
sterile-product
areas unless
rigorous
and
clearly defined
entry
procedures have been
followed.
39.
High
standards of
personal hygiene
and
cleanliness
are essential.
Personnel
involved in
the manufacture
of sterile
preparations
should
be
instmcted
to
report any condition
which
may
cause
the
shedding
of
abnormal
nurnbers
or
types
of
contaminants;
periodic
health
checks
for
such
conditions are desirable.
Actions
to
be taken
about
personnel
who could
be
introducing
undue
microbiological
hazard should
be decided
by a
designated
compeient
person.
40. Wristwatches,
make-up and
jewellery
should
not
be
worn
in
clean
areas.
41.
Changing
and
washing
should
follow
a
written
procedure
designed
to
minimize
contamination
of clean area clothing
or carry-through
of contaminants
to
the
clean areas.
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
8/16
42. The
clothing
and
its
quality
should be appropriate
for
the
process
and
the
grade
of the
working area.
It
should
be
worn
in
such
away as
to
protect
the
product
from
contamination.
43.
The
description
of clothing
required
for
each
grade
is
given
below:
o
Grade
D: Hair
and,
where
relevant,
beard should be
covered.
A
general
protective
suit
and appropriate
shoes
or
overshoes
should be
worn. Appropriate
measures
should
be
taken
to avoid
any
contamination coming
from
outside
the clean
area.
.
Grade C:
Hair
and
where
relevant
beard and
moustache should be
covered.
A
single
or
two-piece trouser suit,
gathered
at
the wrists and
with high
neck
and
appropriate
shoes
or
overshoes should
be
worn.
They
should shed
virtually no fibres or
particulate
matter.
Grade
A/B:
Headgear
should totally
enclose
hair
and,
where
relevant, beard and
moustache, it
should be tucked
into
the
neck of the suit;
a face
mask
should
be
worn
to
prevent
the
shedding of droplets.
Appropriate sterilised,
non-powdered
rubber
or
plastic gloves
and sterilised
or
disinfected
footwear
should
be
worn.
Trouser-legs
should
be
tucked inside
the
footwear and
garment
sleeves
into
the
gloves.
The
protective
clothing
should
shed virnally
no
fibres
or
particulate
mafter
and
retain
particles
shed
by the body.
44.
Outdoor clothing
should
not
be brought
into changing
rooms
leading
to
grade
B
and
C
rooms.
For
every
worker
in
a
grade
A/B
area,
clean
sterile
(sterilised
or adequately sanitised)
protective
garments
should be
provided
at
each
work session. Gloves
should be
regularly
disinfected
during
operations.
Masks
and
gloves
should
be changed at
least
for
every
working
session.
45.
Clean
area
clothing
should be cleaned and
handled
in
such
a
way
that
it
does
not
gather
additional
contaminants which
can
later
be
shed.
These
operations
should
follow written
procedures.
Separate
laundry
facilities for
such
clothing
are
desirable.
Inappropriate treatment
of clothing will
damage
fibres
and
may
increase the
risk
of
shedding
of
particles.
Premises
46.In
clean areas,
all
exposed
surfaces
should be smooth,
impervious and
unbroken
in
order
to
minimize
the
shedding
or
accumulation
of
particles
or
micro-organisms
and
to
permit
the
repeated
application
of
cleaning agents,
and
disinfectants
where
used.
47. To reduce
accunulation
of
dust and
to
facilitate
cleaning
there should
be
no
uncleanable
recesses
and a
minimum
of
projecting
ledges,
shelves,
cupboards
and
equipment.
Doors
should be designed to avoid those uncleanable
recesses;
sliding
doors
may
be
undesirable
for
this
reason.
48. False
ceilings
should be
sealed
to
prevent
contamination
from the space
above them.
49. Pipes
and
ducts
and
other
utilities
should be
installed so
that
they
do
not
create
recesses,
unsealed openings and surfaces which
are diffrcult
to clean.
50.
Sinks and drains should be
prohibited
in
grade
A/B
aeas
used
for
aseptic
manufacture.
In
other aeas air
breaks should
be fitted
between
the machine or sink and
the
drains.
Floor
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
9/16
drains
in
lower
grade
clean
rooms should be
fitted
with
traps or
water
seals
to
prevent
back-
flow.
51.
Changing rooms should
be designed
as
airlocks
and
used
to
provide
physical
separation
of
the
different stages
of changing and
so
minimize
microbial
and
particulate
contamination
of
protective
clothing. They
should
be flushed effectively
with
filtered
air.
The final stage of
the
changing
room
should,
in
the
at-rest
state,
be the
same
grade
as
the area
into
which
it
leads.
The use
of
separate
changing
rooms
for
entering
and leaving
clean
areas
is
sometimes
desirable.
In
general
hand
washing
facilities
should be
provided
only
in
the
first
stage
of the
changing rooms.
52. Both
airlock
doors should
not
be
opened
simultaneously-
An
interlocking
system
or
a
visual
and/or
audible
warning
system
should
be
operated
to
prevent
the opening
of
more
than
one
door
at
a
time.
53.
A
f,ltered
air
supply should
maintain
a
positive
pressure
and
an air
flow
relative
to
surrounding
areas
of a
lower
grade
under
all
operational
conditions
and should
flush the
area
effectively.
Adjacent rooms
of
different
grades
should
have a
pressure
differential
of
l0
-
l5
pascals
(guidance
values).
Particular
attention
should
be
paid
to
the
protection
of
the
zone
of
greatest
risk,
that
is,
the immediate environment
to which
a
product
and cleaned components
which
contact the
product
are
exposed.
The various
recomlnendations
regarding air supplies
and
pressure
differentials
may need
to
be
rnodified where
it
becomes
necessary
to contain
some
materials,
e.g.
pathogenic,
highly toxic,
radioactive or
live
viral
or bacterial
materials or
products.
Decontamination
of
facilities
and treatment
of air
leaving
a clean
area
may be
necessary for
some
operations.
54.
It
should
be
dernonstrated that air-flow
patterns
do
not
present
a contamination
risk,
e.g.
care should
be
taken
to ensure
that
air
flows
do
not distribute
particles
from a
particle-
generating person,
operation
or
machine to
a
zone of
higher
product
risk.
55. A
warning
system should
be
provided
to
indicate
failure
in
the
air
supply.
Indicators of
pressure differences
should
be
fitted
between
areas
where
these
differences
are important.
These
pressure
differences should
be
recorded regularly
or otherwise
documented.
Equipment
56. A
conveyor
belt
should not
pass
through
a
partition
between
a
grade
A
or
B area and
a
processing
area of lower
air cleanliness,
unless the
belt
itself is continually sterilised
(e.g.
in a
sterilising tunnel).
57.
As
far
as
practicable
equipment,
fittings
and
services
should be
designed and
installed
so
that operations,
maintenance
and
repairs
can
be caried
out outside
the clean
area.
If
sterilisation is
required,
it
should
be
carried
out,
wherever
possible,
after
complete
reassernbly.
58.
When equipment
maintenance has
been
carried out
within
the clean area, ihe
area should
be cleaned,
disinfected and/or sterilised where
appropriate,
before
processing
recommences
if
the
required
standards of cleanliness and/or
asepsis
have
not been
maintained
during
the
work.
59. Water
treatment
plants
and
distribution
systems
should
be designed,
constructed
and
maintained so
as
to ensure
a
reliable
source
of
water
of
an
appropriate
quality.
They
should
not
be
operated
beyond their
designed
capacity.
Water
for
injections
should
be
produced,
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
10/16
stored
and distributed
in
a
manner which
prevents
microbial
growth,
for
example
by
constant
circulation
at
a temperature above
70oC.
60. AII
equipment such as sterilisers, air
handling
and
filtration systems,
air
vent and
gas
filters,
water treatment,
generation,
storage
and distribution
systems
should
be subject
to
validation
and
planned
maintenance; their
return
to use should
be approved.
Sanitation
61.
The
sanitation
of
clean
areas
is
particularly
important. They
should
be cleaned
thoroughly
in
accordance
with
a
written
programme.
Where disinfectants are
used,
more than one type
should
be employed. Monitoring
should
be undertaken
regularly
in
order
to detect the
development
of resistant
strains.
62. Disinfectants
and
detergents
should be
monitored
for
microbial contamination;
dilutions
should be
kept in
previously
cleaned containers
and should only be stored
for
defined
periods
unless sterilised.
Disinfectants
and
detergents used
in Grades
A
and
B areas
should be
sterile
prior
to
use.
63. Fumigation
of
clean areas
may
be useful
for reducing
microbiological
contamination
in
inaccessible places.
Processing
64. Precautions
to
minimize
contamination should be
taken
during
all
processing
stages
including
the
stages
before sterilisation.
65. Preparations
of
microbiological
origin
should
not
be
made or
filled in areas
used
for the
processing
of other medicinal
products;
however,
vaccines
of dead
organisms
or of
bacterial
extracts
may
be
filled,
after
inactivation, in
the
same
premises
as other
sterile
medicinal
products.
66.
Validation of
aseptic
processing
should
include a
process
simulation
test using a
nutrient
medium
(media
fill).Selection
of
the
nuftient medium should
be
made
based
on
dosage
form
of
the
product
and
selectivity, clarity,
concentration and
suitability
for sterilisation
of the
nutrient
rnedium.
67.
The
process
simulation
test
should
imitate as
closely as
possible
the
routine aseptic
manufacturing
process
and
include all the critical subsequent
manufacturing steps.
It should
also
take
into
account
various
interventions
known
to occur during
normal
production
as well
as
\/orst-case
situations.
68.
Process simulation tests should be
performed
as
initial
validation
with
three
consecutive
satisfactory simulation
tests
per shift
and
repeated
at
defined intervals
and after
any
significant modification
to
the
HVAC-system,
equipment,
process
and
number of
shifts.
Normally
process
simulation tests should
be
repeated
fwice a
year per
shift and
process.
69. The nurnber
of
containers used
for media fills
should
be sufftcient to enable
a
valid
evaluation.
For
small batches, the
number
of
containers
for
media
fills
should at
least
equal
the size
of
the
product
batch.
The
target should be
zero
growth
and
the
following should
apply:
10
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
11/16
o
When
filling
fewer than 5000
units,
no contaminated units should be detected.
.
When
filling 5,000
to
10,000
units:
a) One
(
I
)
contaminated unit
should
result in an
investigation, including
consideration of
a
repeat media fill;
b)
Two
(2)
contaminated
units
are considered
cause
for revalidation, following
investigation.
o
When
filling
more
than
10,000
units:
a)
One
(
l)
contaminated
unit
should result
in
an
investigation;
b)
Two
(2)
contaminated
units
are considered cause
for revalidation,
following
investigation.
70.
For
any run size, intennittent incidents
of
microbial contamination rxay be
indicative
of
low-level
contamination
that should be
investigated.
Investigation of
gross
failures
should
include
the
potential
impact
on
the sterility assurance
of
batches manufactured since the
last
successful
media
fill.
71.
Care should be
taken that any
validation
does not
compromise
the
processes.
72.
Water
sources,
water treatment
equipment and treated
water
should
be
monitored
regularly
for
chemical and
biological
contamination
and,
as appropriate,
for
endotoxins.
Records
should
be
maintained
of
the results
of
the
monitoring
and
of any
action
taken.
73.
Activities in
clean
areas
and
especially
when
aseptic
operations
are
in
progress
should
be
kept
to
a
minimurn
and
movement
of
personnel
should
be controlled and
rnethodical, to avoid
excessive shedding
of
particles
and organisms
due
to over-vigorous activity.
The
ambient
temperature and
humidity
should
not
be uncomfortably
high
because of the
nature of the
garments
worn.
74.
Microbiological
contamination of starting materials should be
minimal.
Specifications
should
include requirements
for
microbiological
quality
when
the
need
for
this
has
been
indicated
by
monitoring.
75.
Containers
and
mateials liable
to
generate
fibres
should
be minimised
in clean areas.
76.
Where
appropriate,
measures
should
be
taken to
minimize the
particulate
contamination
of
the end
product.
77.
Components, containers and equipment should
be
handled
after the
f,rnal
cleaning
process
in
such a
way
that they are
not
recontaminated.
78.
The interval
between the washing and drying and the sterilisation of
components,
containers
and equipment
as well
as between their sterilisation and
use
should
be
minimised
and
subject to a time-limit
appropriate to
the storage
conditions.
79.
The
time
between
the start of the
preparation
of
a
solution and
its
sterilisation
or
filtration
through a
micro-organism-retaining
filter
should
be
rninimised. There should be
a
set
maximum
pennissible
time
for
each
product
that takes
into
account
its
composition
and
the
prescribed
method
of
storage.
80. The
bioburden
should be
monitored before
sterilisation.
There should be
working
limits
on
contamination
immediately
before
sterilisation,
which are
related
io the
eff,rciency
of the
method
to be
used.
Bioburden
assay
should be
performed
on
each
batch
for
both
aseptically
11
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
12/16
filled
product
and
terminally
sterilised
products.
Where overkill sterilisation
parameters
are
set
for
tenninally sterilised
products,
bioburden
might
be
monitored only
at
suitable
scheduled
intervals.
For
parametric
release
systems,
bioburden
assay
should
be
performed
on
each
batch
and considered as an in-process test. Where appropriate
the
level
of
endotoxins
should
be
monitored.
All
solutions,
in
particular
large volume
infusion fluids"
should
be
passed
through
a
micro-organism-retaining
filter,
if
possible
sited
immediately before
filling.
81.
Cornponents, containers, equipment and any other
article required
in
a clean
area
where
aseptic
work
takes
place
should
be
sterilised
and
passed
into the area through
double-ended
sterilisers
sealed
into
the
wall,
or by
a
procedure
which
achieves
the
same
objective
of
not
introducing
contamination.
Non-combustible
gases
should
be
passed
through
micro-organisrn
retentive filters.
82. The
efficacy of any
new
procedure
should
be
validated, and
the
validation verified
at
scheduled
intervals
based
on
performance
history
or
when any signihcant
change
is made
in
the
process
or
equipment.
Sterilisation
83.
All
sterilisation
processes
should
be
validated.
Particular attention should
be
given
when
the
adopted
sterilisation method
is not
described
in
the cuffent
edition
of
the
European
Pharmacopoeia,
or when
it
is
used
for
a
product
which
is not
a simple
aqueous
or oily
solution. Where
possible,
heat
sterilisation
is
the
method of choice.
In
any case,
the
sterilisation
process
must
be
in
accordance
with
the
rnarketing and
manufacturing
authorisations.
84. Before
any sterilisation
process
is
adopted
its
suitability
fo the
product
and
its
efficacy
in
achieving
the
desired
sterilising conditions
in
all
parts
of
each
type of
load
to
be
processed
should be
demonstrated
by
physical
measurements
and
by biological
indicators
where
appropriate.
The validity
of the
process
should be verified
at
scheduled
intervals,
at
least
annually, and whenever significant
modifications have been made
to
the
equiprnent.
Records
should
be
kept
of the
results.
85. For
effective sterilisation the whole of the
material
must
be
subjected
to
the required
treatment
and the
process
should be designed to ensure
that this
is
achieved.
86.
Validated
loading
patterns
should be established
for all sterilisation
processes.
87.
Biological
indicators
should be
considered as
an additional
method
for monitoring the
sterilisation.
They
should be stored and used
according to
the
manufacturer's
instructions,
and
their
quality
checked by
positive
controls.
If
biological
indicators are used,
strict
precautions
should
be
taken
to
avoid transfening
microbial
contamination
from them.
88. There should
be
a clear
means
of
differentiating
products
which
have
not
been sterilised
from
those which
have.
Each
basket,
tray
or
other carrier
of
products
or components
should
be clearly
labelled
with
the
material name,
its
batch
number
and
an
indication
of
whether or
not it
has
been
sterilised. Indicators such
as
autoclave tape
may be used, where
appropriate,
to
indicate whether or not
a
batch
(or
sub-batch) has
passed
through
a
sterilisation
process,
but
they
do
not
give
a
reliable
indication that
the
lot
is,
in fact,
sterile.
89.
Sterilisation
records
should
be available for
each
sterilisation
run. They should
be
approved as
part
of
the
batch
release
procedure.
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
13/16
Sterilisation
by
heat
90. Each
heat
sterilisation
cycle
should be
recorded on
a
time/temperature
chart
with
a
sufficiently
large
scale or by
other appropriate
equipment
with suitable accuracy
and
precision.
The
position
of
the temperature
probes
used
for controlling
and/or
recording should
have
been determined
during the
validation,
and where applicable
also
checked against
a
second
independent
temperature
probe
located at the
same
position.
91.
Chemical
or
biological
indicators
may
also be
used,
but
should
not.
take the place
of
physical
measurements.
92.
Sufficient time
lnust
be allowed
for the
whole
of the
load
to
reach the
required
temperature before
measurement
of
the
sterilising
time-period
is
commenced.
This time
must
be
detennined
for
each
type
of
load to
be
processed.
93. After the high
temperature
phase
of a
heat sterilisation
cycle,
precautions
should
be
taken
against
contamination
of
a sterilised
load during cooling.
Any cooling
fluid or
gas
in
contact
with
the
product
should be sterilised
unless
it
can
be
shown
that
any
leaking container
would
not.
be approved
for
use.
Moist
heat
94. Both
temperature and
pressure
should
be
used to
monitor
the
process.
Control
instrumentation
should
normally
be
independent
of
monitoring
instrumentation
and
recording
charts. Where automated control and
monitoring
systems
are
used
for these
applications
they
should
be
validated to
ensure
that
critical
process
requirements
are
met.
System
and cycle
faults
should be
registered
by
the
system and observed
by the
operator.
The reading of
the
independent
temperature
indicator should be
routinely
checked
against
the chart
recorder
during
the
sterilisation
period.
For sterilisers
fitted with a
drain
at
the
bottorn
of
the
chamber.
it
may
also
be
necessary
to
record the
temperature
at this
position,
throughout
the
sterilisation
period.
There
should
be frequent
leak tests
on
the
chamber
when
a
vacuum
phase is
part
of
the
cycle.
95.
The
items
to
be
sterilised,
other than
products
in
sealed
containers,
should
be
wrapped
in
a
material which
allows
removal
of air
and
penetration
of
steam but
which
prevents
recontamination
after sterilisation.
All
parts
of
the
load
should
be
in contact
with
the
sterilizing agent
at
the
required
temperature
for
the
required time.
96.
Care should be
taken
to
ensure
that steam
used
for
sterilisation
is of suitable
quality
and
does
not
contain
additives
at
a
level
which
could cause
contamination
of
product
or
equipment.
Dry heat
97 .
The
process
used
should
include air circulation
within
the chamber
and
the
maintenance
of
a positive
pressure
to
prevent
the entry
of
non-sterile
air.
Any air
adrnitted
should
be
passed
through a
HEPA filter.
Where this
process
is also
intended
to
remove
pyrogens,
challenge
tests
using endotoxins should be
used as
part
of the
validation.
Sterilisation
by
radiation
98.
Radiation
sterilisation
is
used
mainly
for
the sterilisation
of
heat
sensitive
materials
and
products.
Many medicinal
products
and some
packaging
materials
are
radiation-sensitive,
so
this
method
is
permissible
only
when the absence
of
deleterious
effects
on the
product
has
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
14/16
been confirmed experimentally.
Ultraviolet
iruadiation is not normally
an
acceptable
method
of
sterilisation.
99, During
the sterilisation
procedure
the
radiation dose should be
measured.
For
this
purpose,
dosimetry
indicators
which are
independent
of
dose
rate
should be
used,
giving
a
quantitative
measurement
of
the dose received
by the
product
itself.
Dosimeters
should
be
inserted
in
the
load
in
sufficient
nurnber
and
close
enough
together
to
ensure that
there
is
always
a dosimeter
in the irradiator.
Where
plastic
dosimeters
are
used they
should be used
within
the time-limit
of
their
calibration. Dosimeter
absorbances
should
be
read
within
a
shorf period
after
exposure
to radiation.
100.
Biological indicators may
be used as
an
additional control
101.
Validation
procedures
should
ensure
that
the
effects
of variations
in
density
of
the
packages
are
considered.
102. Materials handling
procedures
should
prevent
mix-up
between
irradiated and
non-
inadiated materials. Radiation
sensitive colour disks should
also
be
used
on each
package
to
differentiate befween
packages
which have been subjected to
inadiation
and
those
which
have
not.
103. The
total
radiation
dose
should
be administered
within a
predetermined
time
span.
Sterilisation with
ethylene
oxide
104.
This method
should
only
be used when no other
method is
practicable.
During
process
validation
it
should be
shown
that
there
is no
damaging
effect on the
product
and
that
the
conditions and time allowed
for
degassing
are
such
as
to
reduce
any
residual
gas
and
reaction
products
to defined
acceptable limits for the type of
product
or
material.
105.
Direct
contact between
gas
and microbial cells
is
essential;
precautions
should be taken
to
avoid the
presence
of
organisms
likely
to be enclosed
in material
such
as
crystals or dried
protein.
The
nature
and
quantity
of
packaging
materials
can
significantly
affect the process.
106. Before
exposure to the
gas,
materials
should be brought
into
equilibriun
with
the
hurnidity
and temperature
required
by
the
process.
The
time
required
for
this should
be
balanced against the
opposing
need
to
minimize
the
time before
sterilisation.
107. Each sterilisation
cycle should
be monitored
with suitable
biological
indicators,
using
the
appropriate
number
of
test
pieces
distributed
throughout
the load.
The inforrnation
so
obtained
should
form
part
of the batch
record.
108.
For
each
sterilisation cycle,
records
should
be
made
of
the time
taken
to
complete
the
cycle,
of
the pressure,
temperaftre
and
humidity
within
the chamber
during
the
process
and
of
the
gas
concentration and
of
the
total
amount of
gas
used.
The
pressure
and temperature
should
be
recorded throughout
the cycle on a chart.
The record(s) should
form
part
of
the
batch
record.
109.
After sterilisation,
the
load
should be stored
in
a
controlled
manner
under
ventilated
conditions
to allow residual
gas
and
reaction
products
to
reduce to the defined
level.
This
process
should
be
validated.
14
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
15/16
Filtration
of
medicinal
products
which
cannot
be
sterilised
in
their
final container
I10.
Filtration
alone
is not
considered
sufficient
when sterilisation
in the
final
container
is
possible.
With
regard
to
methods
currently
available,
steam
sterilisation
is
to be
prefened.
If
the
product
cannot
be
sterilised
in the
final
container,
solutions
or
liquids
can
be
filtered
through
a
sterile
filter of
nominal
pore
size of
0.22 micron
(or
less),
or
with at
least
equivalent
micro-organism retaining
properties,
into a
previously
sterilised
container.
Such
filters
can
remove most bacteria
and
moulds,
but not
all
vimses
or
mycoplasmas. Consideration
should
be
given
to complementing
the
filtration
process
with some degree
of
heat
treatment.
I I
l.
Due
to the
potential
additional
risks of the
filtration
method
as
compared
with other
sterilization
processes,
a
second
filtration
via
a
further
sterilised
micro-organism
retaining
frlter, immediately
prior
to
filling, may be
advisable.
The final sterile
filtration should
be
carried out
as
close
as
possible
to the
filling
point.
I
12.
Fibre-shedding characteristics
of filters should
be
minimal.
113. The integrity
of
the sterilised
filter shoud
be
verified
before
use and should
be
confirmed
mmediately after use
by
an appropriate
method such
as
a bubble
point,
diffusive
flow
or
pressure
hold
test. The
time
taken
to
filter
a
known volume
of bulk
solution
and
the
pressure
difference
to
be
used
across
the
filter
should
be
detennined
during
validation
and any
significant
differences
from
this
during
routine
manufacturing
should
be
noted and
investigated. Results
of
these checks
should be
included
in the
batch
record.
The iutegrity of
critical
gas
and
air vent
filters
should
be confirmed
after
use.
The integrity of
other
filters
should
be
confirmed
at
appropriate
intervals.
I
14. The same
filter
should
not
be
used
for
more than one
working
day
unless
such use
has
been
validated.
I15. The
filter
should
not
affect
the
product
by
removal of
ingredients
from it
or by
release
of
substances
into
it.
Finishing
of sterile
products
1
16.
Partially
stoppered
freeze drying
vials
should
be
maintained under
Grade
A
conditions
at
all tirnes until
the stopper
is fully inserted.
117.
Containers
should be
closed
by appropriately
validated
methods. Containers
closed
by
fusion,
e.g.
glass
or
plastic
ampoules
should
be
subiect
to
100% integrity testing.
Samples
of
other containers
should be checked
for integrity according
to
appropriate
procedures.
118.
The
containe
closure
system
for aseptically
filled
vials is not fully integral until
the
aluminium cap
has
been
crimped
into
place
on the
stoppered
vial.
Crimping
of
the cap should
therefore
be
performed
as
soon
as
possible after
stopper
insenion.
l19.
As
the
equipmeni
used to crimp
vial
caps
can
generate large
quantities
of non-viable
particulates,
the
equipment should
be
located
at a
separate station
equipped
with adequate
air
extraction-
120.
Vial
capping
can be
undertaken
as an
aseptic
process
using
sterilised
caps
or as a clean
process
outside
the aseptic core.
Where
this
latter
approach
is adopted,
vials
should be
protected
by
Grade A
conditions
up
to
the
point
of
leaving the aseptic
processing
area,
and
thereafter
stoppered vials should
be
protected
with a Grade
A
air
supply
until
the
cap
has
been
15
-
7/27/2019 Eu Gmp Vol 4 Nov 2008
16/16
crimped.
121.
Vials
with
missing or displaced stoppers
should
be
re.jected
prior
to
capping.
Where
human
intervention
is required at the capping station,
appropriate
technology
should
be
used
to
prevent
direct
contact
with
the
vials
and to
minimise
microbial
contamination.
122. Restricted access barriers
and
isolators
may be benehcial
in
assuring
the
required
conditions
and
minirnising
direct
human
interventions
into the
capping
operation.
123.
Containers
sealed
under
vacuurn
should
be
tested
for
maintenance
of
that
vacuum after
an
appropriate,
pre-determined period.
124.
Filled
containers
of
parenteral products
should
be
inspected
individually
for
extraneous
contamination
or other
defects.
When inspection
is done
visually,
it should
be
done
under
suitable
and
controlled
conditions of
illumination
and background.
Operators
doing
the
inspection should
pass
regular eye-sight
checks,
with
spectacles
if
worn, and
be
allowed
frequent breaks
from
inspection. Where other
methods
of
inspection
are used,
the
process
should
be
validated and the
performance
of
the
equipment
checked
at
intervals.
Results
should
be
recorded.
Quality
control
125.
The
sterility
test applied to the
finished
product
should
only
be
regarded
as
the
last
in
a
series
of control
measures by which sterility
is assured.
The test
should
be
validated
for
the
product(s)
concerned.
126.In
those
cases
where
parametric
release has been
authorised,
special
attention
should
be
paid
to the
validation
and
the monitoring of the
entire
manufacturing
process.
I27. Samples
taken
for
sterility
testing
should be
representative
of the
whole of
the
batch, but
should
in
particular
include samples taken
from
parts
of the
batch
considered
to be
most at
risk of
contamination,
e.g.:
a.
for
products
which have been
filled
aseptically,
samples
should
include
containers
f,rlled
at
the
beginning
and
end
of the batch and after
any signifTcant
intervention,
b.
or
products
which
have
been
heat
sterilised
in
their
final
containers,
consideration
should
be
given
to
king
samples
from
the
potentially
coolest
part
of
the
load.