eu – lifetime / universität karlsruhe (th) / tmb-fm / prof. kunibert lennerts – dipl.-ing....

1EU – Lifetime / Universität Karlsruhe (TH) / TMB-FM / Prof. Kunibert Lennerts – Dipl.-Ing. Karin Diez / Lyon 17.4.2005 Nr.1

THEMATIC NETWORK LIFETIME - WP1: Best practice and knowledge of lifetime

engineering

final presentation

WP 1 leader: Universität Karlsruhe (TH), TMB/FM

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kunibert Lennerts Dipl.-Ing. Karin Diez

COMPETITIVE and SUSTAINABLE GROWTH PROGRAMME


WP 1: Best practice and knowledge of lifetime engineering

Working steps

Questionnaire sent out in August 2002Follow up questionnaire sent out in November 2002Design of a database on basis of results of questionnairesSecond call for data in May 2004 to NDG LeadersRefinement of databaseUpload of database into Netspace for Member’s useAnalysis and Benchmarking of data


WP 1: tasks

structured database

Task 1: Exploring and benchmarking

of best practices

Task 2: Listing of

competencies and current practices

Task 3: identifying gaps in

competence, education and

training

Task 4: identifying gaps

in transfer activities

Task 6: Collecting and

finishing Deliverable 1

Task 5: Concluding state of the art in R&D,

dissemination, exploitation,

education and training

Keywords


WP 1: 2nd call for data research projects – example excel sheet

Sent out to all NDG leaders


WP 1: 2nd call for data research projects – example: completed data

Name of Project: OPIK

Participants: Universität Karlsruhe, TMB-FM; several hospitals

Start: 2000

End: 2003

Short description: processes in hosptials, benchmarking

Website: www.facility-management.uni-karlsruhe.de

Keywords out of list: 3,5,7,23

Keyword own definition (optional): benchmarking

Area (Buildings, Infrastructures, B&I): Buildings

Language: German

Partners from industry (Y/N): Y

Product development (Y/N): N

ID-Country, member, ID-Project: Germany, 5, 1


WP 1: 2nd call for data Educational courses – example excel sheet



WP 1: 2nd call for data Educational courses – example: completed data

Name of Course: Life cycle engineering of buildings

Member: 64


Language: Finnish

ID-Country: 8 Finland

Institution giving course: Helsinki University of Technology/Structural engineering and building physics

Keywords out of list: 1, 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 25, 29


WP 1: 2nd call for data Training courses – example excel sheet



WP 1: 2nd call for data Training courses – example: completed data

Name of Course: Plumbing and Heating

Institution giving course: FAS Training Centre, Baldoyle, Dublin 13

Member: 82


ID-Country: Ireland

Language: English

Keywords out of list: 8, 10, 15, 25, 31, 34


WP 1: 2nd call for data ACCESS database

Why using ACCESS?

challange: - Complex data from different sources

- relationship of data (1:1; n:m)

- need for a searching function

Access provides all possibilities for the design of a well structured database.


Database Structure

Structured searching routines can be executed in terms of:

research projects educational courses training courses standards, handbooks

All data is referenced to:

keyword country language member responsible for data / contact address


Database Queries

Example: Query on educational courses for language shall be German


Database Queries

Example: Query on educational courses for language shall be English


Database Queries

Example: Query on educational courses for language shall be German and keyword shall be “3 whole life costing”.


Benchmarking

The data collected in the database concerning research, education and training has been benchmarked under the following aspects:

competence (keywords and main topics) general national

gaps (keywords and main topics) general national

Transfer of research into praxis

Procedure: Each entry in the database is referenced to one or more keywords. In terms of benchmarking we are comparing how many times the keywords have been named to reference the entries.


Definition Competence Centres - Gaps

We define competence within the Lifetime Network on basis of the following aspects:

A search in the database to one of those topics will give a good starting point and contacts for further investigation

new research can build on published work Education / Training can be derived

We define gaps within the Lifetime Network on basis of the following aspects:

A search in the database to one of those topics gives very little or none results

education or training is (nearly) not available


Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Research ProjectsAt this state of the project there are 293 entries listed in the database.

The middle value of the “Use of keyword” of all keywords is 19. The standard deviation is 14 where the minimal value is 3 and the maximal value is 60. We take a closer look at all keywords where the Use of keyword is over 30 or under 8.


Competence Centres

Keywords named more often than 30 times (Use of keyword >30):

1 investment planning (50) 100 lifetime design (48) 14 economy of nature, environmental impact assessment

technology (45) 300 recycling technology (43) 400 lifetime management and maintenance (60) 24 modernisation planning and execution (32) 21 maintenance planning and execution (32) 45 optimisation of materials and components (35)


GapsKeywords that are underrepresented (Use of keyword <8):

13 multiple attribute decision making (e. g. MADA) (5) 18 selective demolition for recycling (7) 23 “Infrastructural management” (security, cleaning) (4) 25 analysis of the requirements of owner/user (e. g. QFD method) (5) 28 network (=total sample of the managed objects) planning (5) 500 Culture (5) 31 Building traditions (5) 32 Life style (5) 33 Business culture (5) 34 Aesthetics (6) 35 Architectural styles and trends (3) 36 Image (5) 39 sustainable city/regional planning (5)


Benchmarking to use of keywords per country

Amount of data for each country available in the database Share of projects for each country (293 in total)

2% 6%

1%

0%

2%

3%

11%

10%

2%

17%10%

0%

1%

0%

0%0%

4%

3%

3%

4%

0%

1%0% 9%

5%2%

2%

2%

Australia 6Austria 17Belgium 4Bulgaria 0Czechoslovakia 6Denmark 10Estonia 32Finland 29France 6Germany 49Greece 28Hungary 1Iceland 3Ireland 1Italy 0J apan 0Lithuania 13Netherlands 8Norway 10Poland 13Portugal 0Romania 2Slovenia 0Spain 26Sweden 14Switzerland 5United Kingdom 5USA 5


Use of keywords for all countries

Use of keywords for each country’s research projects; at the same time the summed up use of keywords for all countries.

We can derive for which keywords there seem to be existing competence centres and at the same time we can allocate them.

Further investigation is possible via searching routine in database


Transfer from research into praxis

From 293 projects in total we have information about involvement of industry partners only for 98 projects.

The share of projects where industry partners are involved is 65%.

Number of projects where partners from Industry are involved

195

64

34number of projects whereno information is availablepartners from industryinvolvedno partners from industry

Share of Projects where partners of industry are involved

65%

35% partners from industryinvolvedno partners from industry


Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Education

At this state of the project 109 educational courses are listed in the database.

The middle value of the “Use of keyword” of all keywords is 5,9. The standard deviation is 4,2 where the minimal value is 0 and the maximal value is 20. We take a closer look at all keywords where the Use of keyword is over 10 or under 2.


Competence Centres


1 Investment planning (12) 3 Whole life costing (11) 6 Performance data of materials and products (13) 7 Service life planning (11) 8 Durability limit states and service life design (12) 13 Energy efficiency in use (15) 21 maintenance planning and execution (20) 24 modernisation planning and execution (14)



500 Culture (1) 31 Building traditions (1) 32 Life style (1) 33 Business culture (1) 37 thematic network (0)


Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Training

At this state of the project 83 training courses are listed in the database.

The middle value of the “Use of keyword” of all keywords is 4,5. The standard deviation is 4,4 where the minimal value is 0 and the maximal value is 16. We take a closer look at all keywords where the Use of keyword is over 9 or under 1.


Competence Centres


1 Investment planning (15) 7 Service life planning (12) 14 Economy of nature, environmental impact assessment

technology (12) 15 Energy efficiency in use (15) 21 Maintenance planning and execution (16) 23 Infrastructural management (security, cleaning) (10)



4 usability, functionality and obsolescence analysis and design (0) 12 design for reuse (0) 28 network planning (0) 29 multiple attribute decision making (0) 32 Life style (0) 33 Business culture (0) 35 Architectural styles and trends (0) 36 Image (0) 37 thematic network (0)

eu – lifetime / universität karlsruhe (th) / tmb-fm / prof. kunibert lennerts – dipl.-ing....

Documents