eu rohs amendments: meet the new rohs. same as the old rohs?
DESCRIPTION
EU RoHS AMENDMENTS: Meet the New RoHS. Same as the Old RoHS?. Information Technology Industry Council Spring Meeting March 19, 2009. Jean-Cyril Walker Partner Keller and Heckman LLP 1001 G St., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 202-434-4181 [email protected]. www.khlaw.com. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Jean-Cyril WalkerPartner
Keller and Heckman LLP1001 G St., NW
Washington, D.C. 20001202-434-4181
www.khlaw.com
Washington, D.C. ● Brussels ● San Francisco ● Shanghai
EU RoHS AMENDMENTS:Meet the New RoHS. Same as
the Old RoHS?
Information Technology Industry CouncilSpring Meeting
March 19, 2009
2│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20092
Why revise RoHS? Review required under Article 6 of current directive
Clearer directive – simpler in operation
Improve enforcement at the national level
Adapt to technical and scientific progress
Complement and increase coherence with other EU legislation
3│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20093
Summary of Key Changes• Change to RoHS scope
• Use of REACH methodology for new substances○ No new substances proposed
• RoHS exemptions - limited to 4 years – new review mechanism
• Incorporate Market Surveillance to reduce non-compliant products
4│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20094
Changes to RoHS Scope• Basic objectives remain the same
• RoHS de-linked from WEEE○ WEEE Categories 8 & 9 added
- Medical devices, monitoring and control instruments – 1/2014- In vitro diagnostic and medical devices – 1/2016- Industrial monitoring and control instruments – 1/2017- Active implantable medical devices – TBD by 2020
• Excludes spare parts for repair or re-use○ “Placed on the market” before 7/1/2006○ Category 8 & 9 products placed on the market before dates above○ Equipment subject to an exemption and placed on market before
exemption expires
5│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20095
New Substances• Based on unacceptable risk to human health or environment
• Substances to be chosen “based on” Articles 69-72 of REACH (lengthy process)
• Particular attention to substances in Articles III○ Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)○ Diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP)○ Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP)○ Dibutyl phthalate (DBP)○ !!!! TBBPA – not listed for consideration!!!
6│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20096
Changes to Exemption Process
• 4 year limitation – subject to renewal○ Submit renewal requests 18 months before expiration
• Additional exemption criteria○ Availability and reliability of substitutes○ Consideration of “socio-economic” factors
• Exemption review – should be less political○ Dealt with by TAC not Parliament & Council
• Commission to develop rules for exemption process○ Application data○ Substitution plan (in line with REACH)
• Decision process – need for certainty pending decision
7│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20097
Market Surveillances• RoHS II to incorporate new legislative framework
○ Specifies obligations – manufacturers, imports, distributors- Sample testing
- Identification labeling
- Defect/recall information/notification
• CE marking required
• Conformity assessment – standard TBD○ Presumption of conformity
• Member states to conduct market surveillance
8│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20098
Timing and Opportunities
• Timing Estimates (Rough)○ First reading – late 2009/early 2010○ Adoption – Spring/Summer 2010○ Entry into Force – mid/late 2012
• Opportunities for Impact○ Members of Environmental Committee○ Rapporteurs ○ Department of Commerce○ WTO consultation process?
9│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Copyright © 20099
Any questions?
Jean-Cyril WalkerPartner
Keller and Heckman LLP1001 G St., NW
Washington, D.C. 20001202-434-4181
www.khlaw.com
Washington, D.C. ● Brussels ● San Francisco ● Shanghai
Thank you!