euradwaste04 – partitioning and transmutation - panel discussion transmutation and partitioning...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Euradwaste04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion Transmutation and partitioning Fast neutron spectrum Critical Heterogeneous Homogeneous](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082917/55152db8550346a87d8b572e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Euradwaste’04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion
Transmutation and partitioningTransmutation and partitioning
Fast neutron spectrumCritical
Heterogeneous
Homogeneous
Thermal neutron spectrum
ADS
Global (all M.A.)
TRU Selective partitioning
Are nuclear systems too flexible ???Are nuclear systems too flexible ???
![Page 2: Euradwaste04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion Transmutation and partitioning Fast neutron spectrum Critical Heterogeneous Homogeneous](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082917/55152db8550346a87d8b572e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Euradwaste’04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion
CriteriaCriteria
Sustainability :• Natural resources utilisation• Minimising long-lived wastes
Fissile material denaturation
Reduced inventories in final disposal
Reduced activity and radio-toxicity in final disposal
Reduced inventories in the overall fuel cycle
Reduced activity in the overall fuel cycle
Economy
![Page 3: Euradwaste04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion Transmutation and partitioning Fast neutron spectrum Critical Heterogeneous Homogeneous](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082917/55152db8550346a87d8b572e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Euradwaste’04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion
EvaluationEvaluation ?
Thermal neutron spectrum Fast neutron spectrum Low level or no TRU at disposal
Uranium Thorium (1) Critical – Global
recycling
ADS – Selective partitioning
Sustainability No No Yes No
Fissile material denaturation Yes Yes Yes Yes
Reduced inventories in final disposal
Yes, if TRU recyling
Yes, if TRU recyling
Yes Yes
Reduced activity and radio-toxicity in final disposal
Yes, if TRU recyling
tbc Yes Yes
Reduced inventories in the overall fuel cycle, final disposal included
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Reduced activity in the overall fuel cycle
No tbc Yes dep. of scen
Fuel cycle constraints High (Cm, Cf, Bk)
tbc Medium High (Cm, Cf, Bk)
Time to be implemented 20 years 20 years 40 years More than 40 years
(1) : case of TRU transmutation using Thorium matrix, without implementing a thorium cycle
Geological
Disposal
![Page 4: Euradwaste04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion Transmutation and partitioning Fast neutron spectrum Critical Heterogeneous Homogeneous](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082917/55152db8550346a87d8b572e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Euradwaste’04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion
Some statements
Using PWR (TRU transmutation) :• Medium term for TRU inventory reduction in reactor
but strong impact on current fuel cycle facilities (some options are ruled out)
• Use of natural U resources• Fissile material denaturation
Using ADS :• R&D needed for viability and feasibility• Not sustainable per se
Using FNR and global TRU recycling • Sustainable• 6 Gen IV systems : 4 fast neutron spectrum with global
recycling of TRU• Promising prospects for resolving new fuel cycle
issues