eurocogsci 2007 presentation

13
Free will and the power of veto: Convergent evidence from Decision- Making Alex Linhares [email protected]

Upload: alexandre-linhares

Post on 11-May-2015

626 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Free will and the power of veto: convergent evidence from decision-making

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Free will and the power of veto:Convergent evidence from Decision-Making

Alex [email protected]

Page 2: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

The traditional view of Free Will

Compare & contrast choices

Page 3: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

…is just like chess. However,

But is this of any quality?

Page 4: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Ron “Suki” King, a checkers world champion

385 opponents—simultaneously

He beat them all

2 seconds per move 12.30mins response

Page 5: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Capablanca’s remark

“I see only one move. The best one.”

José Raul Capablanca

Page 6: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Gary Klein’s work

Firefighters, nurses, jet pilots, radar operators, chess players, etc…

“I never make decisions. I can’t remember a single decision”

“It is always obvious what to do”

Page 7: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Recognition-primed decisions

• Experienced subjects unconsciously primed to act

• Simulation heuristic YES/NO response

Page 8: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Back to Free Will…Libet’s experimental settings

– Complexity clock– Readiness potential– Suprising timing of events

Page 9: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Libet’s experiment

Libet wanted to contrast the times between (i) movement of the fingers, (ii) the start of the readiness potential, and (iii) the instant in which the conscious decision is taken…– This instant can be measured with ‘Wundt’s

compexity clock’, a moving dot (like a second’s pointer), performing one full cycle at each 2.56 secs.

• Classic method in experimental psychology• Very accurate: one hour0.2 secs

The results are clear...

Page 10: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation
Page 11: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

In Libet’s words:

• “the brain evidently ‘decides’ to initiate or, at least, to prepare to initiate an act before there is any reportable subjective awareness that such a decision has taken place”.

• “it is concluded that cerebral initiation even of a spontaneous voluntary act of the kind studied here can and usually does begin unconsciously”.

Brain 106 (1983) 623-42

Page 12: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

Veto theory:

“Potentially available to the conscious function is the possibility of […] vetoing the final progress of the volitional process[…]”

“Conscious will might block or veto the process, so that no act occurs.”

Libet, B. (1999) Do we have free will? Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 47—57.

Page 13: Eurocogsci 2007 Presentation

If Klein is right, then what would the expected timing of neuro-events be like?

Gary Klein

• Subjects unconsciously primed to act; acts feel “obvious”; subjects cannot report on reasons; do not feel to be making decisions

• Simulation heuristic vetoes a primed urge

Benjamin Libet

• The brain initially prepares for an act, subjects only report conscious will to perform the act 250msec after onset of the RP

• There is 100msec for an act to be “vetoed”