european bus system of the future 2 - kollektivtrafikk.no · umberto guida, uitp. european bus...
TRANSCRIPT
21st March 2017
@ebsf_2project
Umberto Guida, UITP
European Bus System of the Future 2
2
Advanced solutions for improvedefficiency and attractiveness ofbus systems
H2020 Innovation Action, May 2015 – April 2018
21 March 2017
Facts & figures
3
42 partners
6 Research topics 31 TIs
11 PTO & PTA 7 BM ≈ 70% market
12 European networks
> 150 buses
21 March 2017
421 March 2017
5
Users’ needs and BS requirements
Tests of technological innovations
Local Evaluation
Global Evaluation
Transferability
21 March 2017
Project Logic
7
Energy of Auxiliaries
Thermal Control
Strategy vs. component
ICE vs. Electric
New bus vs. retrofit
Active Active
PassivePassive
Energy Strategy and Auxiliaries: the domains
21 March 2017
Energy and Thermal control solutions tested in the EBSF_2 Demonstrations
UITP8
Optimised control for auxiliaries, including full electrification
Improved efficiency of HVAC devices
Auxiliaries, design & control
Improved temperature distribution & air
circulation, human experience of climate
Controlleddoor opening
vs. easyaccess
Thermal management, active
Less glass surface versus good visibility and appealing
exterior
Improved low floor isolation
Integratedthermal energy
storages orheat sinks
Improved door sealing
Thermal management, passive
Insulated and/or tinted windows
Solutions under test: overview
Energy efficiency of high-capacity e-busesSOLUTION: Reduce auxiliary energy consumption by 20% through an Intelligent Energy Management System:
learn / predict energy demands optimize the energy flows between the auxiliary systems
and the energy storage unit.
PARTNERS: IRIZAR, TMB, FRAUNHOFER
10
Barcelona
21 March 2017
11
Continuous on-line positioning & auxiliary control via 2-way communication link to back-office server system
2 x 12 m (IRIZAR) full electric Back-Office Server
DresdenAuxiliaries
2 x STW ECX-TC3
CAN & Communication
CAN Interface
GSM-3G
21 March 2017
Energy efficiency of high-capacity e-buses
12
Vehicle Design (capacity, modularity, accessibility)
21 March 2017
Objectives
13
• Increase accessibility for all to bus and bus stops• Investigate new bus layout solutions• Adapt the capacity to the actual demand• Improve passengers’ satisfaction and the
passengers’ perception of service quality
21 March 2017
Solutions under test: overview
1419 January 2017
• DresdenModularity concept: (un)coupling of bus segments.• GothenburgAttractiveness and Efficiency of Innovative External andInternal Design of Electric Buses.• San Sebastian3D Passenger Behavioural Simulation• Design working groupDesign Charter for electric buses: can we express an electricbus as a new urban object in light of the key opportunityoffered by the energy transition?
15
Passenger Behavioural Simulation
3D simulation for designing new bus layouts as optimized interfaces between vehicle and bus stop, improving accessibility and dwell times.
21 March 2017
San Sebastian
16
• A simulation case study is defined by a bus layout, abus line (a set of successive bus stops), a population(passengers boarding and alighting the bus at eachbus stop), and the operator’s parameters for the line(boarding through any door, ticket validation, etc.)
• 8 “types” of passengers have been implemented,based on the “Personas” defined in the former EBSFproject.
• As simulation results, the tool provides the dwell time,the seat time, exit time, and the satisfaction.
Passenger Behavioural Simulation
21 March 2017
17
Bus editor
A wheel chair user boarding the IRIZAR’s i2e fully electric21 March 2017
San Sebastian
19
EBSF_2 Design charter
21 March 2017
20
Metz (F)
BUSES
CITIES PEOPLE
Göteborg (SE)
Urban contexts are changing
21 March 2017
Urban vehicles are changing
21
Scooters
Tramways
Car sharing
Electric cars
21 March 2017
Can we express an electric bus as a new urban object?
International
Congress on
Transport and
Infrastructures
Systems –TIS Roma
2017
electric
diesel
21 March 2017
Rationale
23
• No major change of the bus design and status in the last 10 years except for some specific bus categories (BRT, micro-buses).
• Very limited design innovations in comparison with other vehicle categories (private cars, tramways, scooters).
• Low acceptance of buses by some local authorities.• No distinctive design for Electric buses.
21 March 2017
The energy transition is a key opportunity to changethe bus beyond its technical transformation:
International
Congress on
Transport and
Infrastructures
Systems –TIS Roma
2017
• To serve a better customer experience
• To obtain a status upgrade for the local authorities
Rationale
Objectives
25
• Elaborate a Design Charter for new electric buses topropose a set of key (visual) design principles themanufacturers can mix with their own designstandards
21 March 2017
Involvement of the whole bus ecosystem:
Design Working Group: UITP and PT designers from Attoma, MAN Truck & Bus AG, RATP and Yellow Window.
Involvement of PTO, PTA and manufacturers thanks to UITP working bodies
Interface between bus and urban infrastructure
In-door bus stop – eletcric line 55 Gothenburg
Passengers’ satisfaction of innovative bus stops
21 March 2017
Interface between bus and urban infrastructure
Passengers’ satisfaction of innovative bus stops:
New bus stopsGothenburg
Perception of interior design (choice of
materials, etc)
Perceived access to bus stop
Perceived access to PT Perceived identity of bus (system)
Attractivity Use of PT
21 March 2017
Thank you for your [email protected]
2921 March 2017