european capacity building initiativeecbi fellows views on timeframes and cycles european capacity...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbiFELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES
AND CYCLES
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive
initia
tive e
uro
péen
ne d
e re
nfo
rcem
en
t des
cap
acité
s ecbi
for sustained capacity building in support of international climate change negotiations
pour un renforcement durable des capacités en appui aux négociations internationales sur les changements climatiques
![Page 2: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
1. RATIONALE
• Appropriate for a durable agreement, however not useful for a 5 - 10 year agreement
• Important to dynamically link successive implementation timeframes, as cyclicity does not guarantee succesiveness
• Dynamic contribution cycle, communication-consideration-inscription applicable to different architectures with respect to housing
• 5+5 formulation important for not locking in ambition, and the difficulty of Parties changing contributions presented for inscription
![Page 3: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
Basic Simple Contributions Cycles
Basic Dynamic Contributions Cycle
Enhanced Cycles
5 concrete + 5 indicative Include the graphic***
Communication - consideration - inscription of the first 5 years
• Most INDCs have a 2030 outlook, which could be adjusted to the fit the 5+5 formulation
• Different understanding of the procedures for aggregate consideration; assessment [technical] vs consultative processes [diplomatic] differentiated based on the type of obligations and types of mitigation commitments
• Irrespective of architectural options and solution on differentiation, the 5+5 cycles incl (comm-consider-inscription] is possible , with flexibility
• Scope [adaptation, mitigation, finance, tech/CB]] and modalities [benchmarking for defining the gap and adequacy thereof to be elaborated between 2016-2017] for the consideration exercise
2. CYCLE FEATURES
![Page 4: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
Communication Consideration Inscription
Mitigation INDCs + further definition of UFI
• Technical+ diplomatic process
• Aggregate and not individual
• Limited options for adjustment
• Schedules vs integral part of the agreement
Adaptation INDCs + Defined minimum information
• Planning aspirations and gaps; link between ambition/ adaptation; needs
• Support and adequacy thereof??;
• Schedule vs integral part of the agreement
Finance Pledges • Post 2020 indicative targets??
• Clarified transparency provisions for finance
• Adequacy in aggregate, incl. burden sharing [UP TO DONORS]??
• Define cycle for formalisation through replenishment as an integral part of the agreement [SAME TIMEFRAME]
• Schedule vs integral part of the agreement
3. CYCLE FEATURES
![Page 5: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
• [adaptation not being a commitment - could be problematic for some Parties, inreakout groups] trexplor
• By Paris:• Definition of mínimum information for adaptation in respect of planing
conduct, needs, recognition of efforts by developing countries as part of [NDAP??]
• Definition of developed countries mínimum information in respect of planning conduct, provision of support
• Before agreement enters to forcé (2016-2017):
• Planning/implemntation guidelines;• Need assessment methodologies• Transparency of support
• Consideration process to assess adequacy by 2018-19; inscription by 2019
• ASSURANCES: The assesed needs in light of mitigation ambition is NOT only Annex II bill; Planning objectives pertain to conduct rather than adaptation effectiveness
4. SYNOPSIS - ADAPTATION
![Page 6: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
• By Paris:• Communicate indicative post 2020 finance undertakings• Adopt transparency provisions and pathways approach, and [replenishment
process being core incl. modalities including recipients + adequacy assessment]
• Before agreement enters to forcé (2016-2017):• Transparency methodologies
• Consideration process to assess adequacy by 2018; inscription by 2019-2022 for the period 2020-2025 [including all sources and types of finance; proportions of grants, credit lines be based on decisions by the CMP/CoP/Governing Body/SCF/GCF Board]
• FELLOWS: Is the understanding the same in terms of providers of finance being rich developed countries + voluntary recognition of South-South cooperation; recipients being developing countries, particulalry those that are vulnerable - lists??
• • ASSURANCES: Rich developed will as a mínimum obligation provide
finance as per Convention obligation; support includes private sector finance flows over and above defined public sector component
5. SYNOPSIS - FINANCE
![Page 7: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
• By Paris:• Define consideration modalities by Paris• Adopt transparency provisions, further clarified UFI along different types
of commitments??• How do we deal with a Gap?? [how do we know the gap (synthesis report);
WS II without underplay of INDC; methodological challenges with INDCs??; finance clarity and capacity constraints; [equity considerations]
• Before agreement enters to forcé (2016-2017):• Accounting and counting rules • Undertake the consideration process [equity considerations]• Cloing the gap
• Inscription of all undertakings by 2019; in a schedules environment what asurances for developing countries?
• DISCUSSION WITH PARTNERS: Vision of the global stock-take; FELLOWS, what are our fears and interests in such a stock take?
6. SYNOPSIS - MITIGATION
![Page 8: European capacity building initiativeecbi FELLOWS VIEWS ON TIMEFRAMES AND CYCLES european capacity building initiative initiative européenne de renforcement](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eef5503460f94bff6c4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
• Submitted INDCs currently cover either 5 [in some instances there is an indicative trajectory] or 10 years [in some cases the Parties have a trajectory]
• Different understanding of the procedures for consideration; assessment [technical] vs consultative processes [diplomatic]
• Difference in architectural options [integral part of the agreement in terms of conduct and outcomes vs housing in schedules with conduct being an integral part of the agreement]
• Difference in the scope [adaptation, mitigation, finance] and modalities [benchmarking for defining the gap and adequacy thereof] of the consideration exercise
• Others, differentiation, parallel cycles vs interlinked cycles, etc
7. SYNOPSIS - CYCLES