european journal of soil science, june 2006,

Upload: jadore999

Post on 30-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    1/19

    Trace element distributions in soils developed in loessdeposits fromnorthern France

    T . S T E R C K E M A N a , F . D O U A Y b , D . B A I Z E c , H . F O U R R I E Rb , N . P R O I X d , C . S C H V A R T Zb & J . C A R I G N A Ne

    aENSAIA-INPL/INRA, Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, BP 172, 54505 Vandoeuvre-le`s-Nancy Cedex,

    bISA, Laboratoire Sols et

    Environnement, 41, rue du Port, 59046 Lille Cedex, cINRA, Unite de Science du Sol, BP 20619, 45166 Olivet Cedex, dINRA,

    Laboratoire dAnalyses des Sols, 273, rue de Cambrai, 62000 Arras, and eCNRS, Centre de Recherches Petrographiques et

    Geochimiques, 15, rue Notre Dame des Pauvres, 54501 Vandoeuvre-le`s-Nancy, France

    Summary

    A pedo-geochemical survey was carried out in the Nord-Pas de Calais region (France) on soils developed

    in loess deposits. Total concentrations of Al, Fe and 18 trace elements, as well as common soil

    characteristics, were determined in samples from 52 surface and 97 deep horizons developed in these

    loess deposits. The Pb isotopic composition was determined in two sola. The composition of deep

    horizons, compared with that of the upper continental crust, with that of horizons developed from 21

    other sedimentary rocks from the region and with that of loess from various parts of the world, confirms

    that loess from the Nord-Pas de Calais region derives from multi-recycled and well-mixed ancient

    sedimentary rocks. Correlation analysis shows that least mobile (i.e. ionic potential (Z/r) is between 3

    and 7) geogenic elements (Bi, Co, Cr, Cu, In, Ni, Pb, Sn, Tl, V, Zn) are associated with the fraction

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    2/19

    few decimetres to about 20 m. The origin of the loess material

    of western Europe is still controversial. It has been proposed

    that these aeolian sediments were derived locally from

    paleoestuaries bordering the English Channel. Alternative

    models favour the role of shallow marine shelves that

    emerged during glacial times. In either case, a reworking of

    Tertiary sediments during the Pleistocene era seems to be

    required before the aeolian deposition (Gallet et al., 1998).

    Our work deals only with soils developed from typical loess

    (Jamagne et al., 1981), excluding those developed in the

    transition zone where loamy aeolian formations are mixed

    with sand.

    In the Nord-Pas de Calais, the development of soils issuing

    from loess is quite slight. Soils developed in this recent mate-

    rial are attributed to luvic BRUNISOLS or NE OLUVISOLS,

    according to the Re fe rentiel Pe dologique (AFES, 1998) or to

    Cambisols or Haplic Luvisols according to the WRB (ISSS,

    1998). Under forest, the soils are often designated as luvic

    BRUNISOLS OLIGOSATURE S or as oligosaturated

    NE OLUVISOLS.

    The luvic BRUNISOLS are distinguished by incipient clay

    illuviation, leading to the formation of a structural horizon

    with some clay coatings (St horizon). The NE OLUVISOLS

    are characterized by a typical BT horizon, resulting from

    marked clay illuviation. The St and BT horizons are brown

    to yellow brown (Munsell: 10YR 4/4 to 10YR 4/6), with a

    loamy to loamy-clayey texture, and a distinct prismatic and

    polyhedral structure. The C horizon generally appears between

    0.8 m and 1.2 m. It can be distinguished from the St and BT

    horizons by its yellowish colour (Munsell: 10YR 5/6), its

    smaller clay content and the absence of structure. The soil

    parent material is often calcareous and designated as Cca.

    An S or SC horizon may be observed between the BT (or St)

    horizons and the Cca horizon. The sola may be truncated as a

    consequence of water erosion.

    In soils developed in a relatively shallow loess stratum over-

    lying an impermeable material (such as clayey Tertiary depos-

    its or residual clay with flints), signs of temporary water

    excess may appear at depths of less than 0.5 m. When the

    loess deposit is thicker, the soils show better natural drainage

    and less distinct hydromorphic features appear at greater

    depths.

    The main use of the loess soils is intensive cultivation for

    various crops (cereals, sugar beet, potatoes, vegetables, etc.).

    Some of them are under permanent grassland and a very small

    portion under forest.

    Canche

    Authie

    Aa

    Lys

    Scarpe

    Esc

    aut

    Sam

    bre

    Lille

    Valenciennes

    Holocene deposits

    Loamysandy transition zone

    Sands zone (thin mantle)Sands zone (thick mantle)

    Loess zone (thin mantle)

    Loess zone (thick mantle)

    FranceBelgium border

    50km

    Dunkerque

    Calais

    Boulogne

    Figure 1 Map of the superficial Pleistocene deposits of northern France, adapted from Paepe & Somme (1970).

    Trace elements in loess soils 393

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    3/19

    Sampling

    Sampling sites were far from potential contamination sources

    (industrial plants, busy roads, houses, etc.). There were 38 sites

    under cultivation, 11 under permanent grassland and three

    under forest. All the horizons were sampled, in soil pits. The

    sola were described according to the Pedological Information

    System (STIPA, 1982). The horizons were sampled starting at

    the bottom of the solum, to avoid contaminating the horizons

    to be sampled. A steel blade was used to detach about 1 kg of

    soil material, which was poured into a polypropylene bag.

    Analysis

    In each solum, samples from three horizons were analysed: the

    surface organo-mineral horizon (LA horizon for cultivated

    soil, A horizon for other soil uses), the C horizon and a

    horizon situated between the previous ones, a BT, S or SChorizon. In one solum situated under forest and another one

    under cultivation, all the horizons were analysed for the deter-

    mination of the lead isotope ratios.

    Methods of analysis are presented in Table 1. Quality con-

    trol was based on internal control samples whose mean and

    uncertainty values were known. For each parameter, a control

    sample was analysed every 1520 samples. The total contents

    of trace and major elements were determined for batches of

    3040 samples. Three blanks, two internal control samples and

    two certified samples (GBW 7401 and GBW 7402) in triplicate

    were inserted into each batch. Moreover, in each batch two

    samples were analysed twice and two others were analysed

    thrice. At the INRA Soil Analysis Laboratory, where the

    analyses were performed, all the parameters, except Bi, In,

    Mo and Sn contents, are controlled by national or interna-

    tional inter-laboratory comparisons. The frequency of these

    comparisons is one sample a month for the pedological para-

    meters (BIPEA, 2000) and four samples every 3 months for

    major and trace elements (Van Dijk et al., 2001). The resultswere expressed on a dried soil basis, after deduction of the

    moisture content.

    Lead isotope ratios were determined using a magnetic sector

    and multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectro-

    meter (MCICPMS) (White et al., 2000) after aqua regia

    extraction and lead separation by anionic exchange chromato-

    graphy (Manhe` s et al., 1980).

    Data processing

    Frequency distributions, correlation matrices, principal com-

    ponents analysis (PCA) and multiple linear correlations wereperformed using the STATISTICA software (StatSoft, 2002).

    Data below the quantification limit were replaced by values of

    half this limit (Holmgren et al., 1993; Sanford et al., 1993).

    Results and discussion

    Soil characteristics

    The frequency distributions of nearly all the parameters mea-

    sured in the deep horizons are only slightly skewed (data not

    shown). Therefore, the data can be reasonably used in regres-

    sion analysis without transformation. The particle-size distri-

    bution fits that of typical loess as given by Jamagne et al.

    Table 1 Methods of analysis. The standards refer to those published by AFNOR (Paris)

    Parameter Principle Standard

    Pretreatment Drying at room temperature, sieving to 2 mm, grinding to 0.250 mm for total dissolution NF ISO 11464

    Residual moisture content Weighing the test portion before and after heating at 105C NF ISO 11465

    Particle-size distribution Sedimentation (050 mm) and sieving (>50 mm) NF X31-107

    Organic carbon Dry combustion or sulfo-chromic acid oxidation (when CaCO3 >50 g kg1) NF ISO 10694,

    NF ISO 14235

    Total carbonates Measurement of the volume of CO2 released after reaction with HCl NF ISO 10693

    pH pH of a water suspension NF ISO 10390

    CEC Percolation of a 1.0 mol l1

    ammonium acetate solution, pH 7 NF X31-130Exchangeable cations Extraction with a 1.0 mol l1 ammonium acetate solution, pH 7 NF X31-108

    Total Al, Bi, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Calcination followed by a HF HClO4 digestion at 180C. Determination by ICPOESa NF ISO 14869-1

    Fe, In, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, or ICPMSb

    Sb, Sn, Tl, V, Zn

    Total Hg Digestion by a sulfo-nitric acid mixture at 60C. Determination by CVAFSc INRA methode

    Total As and Se Digestion by a sulfo-nitric acid mixture containing V2O5. Determination by CVAASd INRA methode

    aICPOES, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.bICPMS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.cCVAFS, cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry.dCVAAS, cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry.eSterckeman et al. (2002a).

    394 T. Sterckeman et al.

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    4/19

    (1981): dominance of coarse silt, and coarse silt to fine silt

    ratios are always above 1 and often above 2 (Table 2).

    Relationships between trace elements and major mineral

    components

    The positive correlations of numerous trace element contents

    with lutum, Al and Fe contents suggest that trace elements are

    specifically associated with phyllosilicates and with iron oxides

    and hydroxides of the finest fraction (Table 3). This is sup-

    ported by the fact that, in the lutum fraction of two deep

    horizons, Sterckeman (2004) found mainly smectites, chlorite

    and illite, together with goethite. In the >2 mm fractions, he

    found chlorite, micas and feldspars whose content decreased

    with increasing fraction size. The quartz content increased

    with the fraction size, the >50 mm fraction containing more

    than 800 g kg1 quartz. This composition could explain the

    negative correlations of trace element contents with the coarse

    fraction content, as quartz acts as a diluent of the carryingphases.

    In the deep horizons, the correlation between Al and Fe

    explains about half of the variance of Bi, Cr, Cu, In, Ni, Pb,

    Sn, Tl and Zn contents and about 80% of that of V (Table 3).

    It also explains the variance of As, Co, Mo and Sb, but at a

    rather smaller level (about 15% to 35%). It does not explain,

    or only slightly, that of Cd, Mn, Hg and Se. More or less close

    Table 2 Physico-chemical characteristics of the soil horizons from the Nord-Pas de Calais loess deposits (median values)

    Horizon type

    Variable Unit LA or A BT S, SC or C Cca Subsoil

    Cultivation

    Size (n) /horizon 38 33 26 11 70

    Thickness /cm 20 15 20 20 20

    Lutum (

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    5/19

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    6/19

    Table3

    Linearcorrelationcoefficients

    betweenvariablesmeasuredinthesoilhorizonsfromtheNord-PasdeCalaisloessdep

    osits.Coefficientssignificantlydifferentfromzero(

    0.05)

    areinboldtype.Coarsefraction(202000mm)isthesumofcoarsesiltandsands

    Lutum

    Finesilt

    Coarsesilt

    Finesand

    Coarsesand

    Coarsefraction

    OrganicC

    pH

    CaCO3

    CEC

    Al

    Fe

    Mn

    Surfacehorizons

    Lutum

    1.00

    0.23

    0.6

    7

    0.4

    7

    0.20

    0.7

    7

    0

    .00

    0.23

    0.2

    7

    0.5

    6

    0.81

    0.8

    2

    0.05

    Finesilt

    0.23

    1.00

    0.3

    0

    0.8

    0

    0.3

    5

    0.8

    0

    0

    .24

    0.26

    0.22

    0.24

    0.37

    0.4

    3

    0.4

    7

    Coarsesilt

    0.6

    7

    0

    .30

    1.00

    0.09

    0.2

    7

    0.6

    2

    0

    .12

    0.17

    0.3

    0

    0.2

    9

    0.58

    0.6

    7

    0.3

    1

    Finesand

    0.4

    7

    0

    .80

    0.09

    1.00

    0.4

    2

    0.8

    1

    0

    .31

    0.17

    0.16

    0.4

    3

    0.49

    0.5

    4

    0.24

    Coarsesand

    0.20

    0.3

    5

    0.2

    7

    0.4

    2

    1.00

    0.3

    5

    0

    .12

    0.07

    0.25

    0.20

    0.28

    0.08

    0.08

    Coarsefraction

    0.7

    7

    0

    .80

    0.6

    2

    0.8

    1

    0.3

    5

    1.00

    0

    .16

    0.03

    0.02

    0.5

    1

    0.75

    0.7

    9

    0.3

    4

    OrganicC

    0.00

    0.24

    0.12

    0.3

    1

    0.12

    0.16

    1

    .00

    0.7

    5

    0.24

    0.7

    8

    0.27

    0.17

    0.5

    4

    pH

    0.23

    0.26

    0.17

    0.17

    0.07

    0.03

    0.7

    5

    1.00

    0.5

    8

    0.4

    2

    0.27

    0.20

    0.3

    4

    CaCO3

    0.2

    7

    0.22

    0.3

    0

    0.16

    0.25

    0.02

    0

    .24

    0.5

    8

    1.00

    0.03

    0.07

    0.04

    0.00

    CEC

    0.5

    6

    0.24

    0.2

    9

    0.4

    3

    0.20

    0.5

    1

    0

    .78

    0.4

    2

    0.03

    1.00

    0.21

    0.3

    1

    0.4

    2

    Al

    0.8

    1

    0

    .37

    0.5

    8

    0.4

    9

    0.2

    8

    0.7

    5

    0

    .27

    0.2

    7

    0.07

    0.21

    1.00

    0.8

    6

    0.3

    8

    Fe

    0.8

    2

    0

    .43

    0.6

    7

    0.5

    4

    0.08

    0.7

    9

    0

    .17

    0.20

    0.04

    0.3

    1

    0.86

    1.00

    0.4

    2

    As

    0.4

    0

    0.03

    0.2

    8

    0.19

    0.10

    0.2

    7

    0

    .23

    0.13

    0.13

    0.3

    6

    0.23

    0.3

    6

    0.11

    Bi

    0.2

    7

    0

    .39

    0.09

    0.5

    1

    0.14

    0.4

    3

    0

    .69

    0.4

    8

    0.13

    0.6

    3

    0.10

    0.21

    0.19

    Cd

    0.07

    0.3

    3

    0.07

    0.19

    0.3

    6

    0.17

    0.4

    2

    0.3

    8

    0.2

    7

    0.2

    9

    0.08

    0.05

    0.17

    Co

    0.5

    0

    0

    .35

    0.6

    0

    0.3

    3

    0.16

    0.5

    4

    0

    .56

    0.4

    7

    0.15

    0.18

    0.68

    0.7

    6

    0.7

    7

    Cr

    0.7

    1

    0

    .36

    0.6

    5

    0.3

    6

    0.14

    0.6

    8

    0

    .37

    0.3

    7

    0.06

    0.13

    0.78

    0.8

    5

    0.5

    0

    Cu

    0.04

    0.22

    0.19

    0.3

    0

    0.16

    0.12

    0

    .05

    0.02

    0.13

    0.06

    0.01

    0.01

    0.09

    Hg

    0.01

    0.26

    0.06

    0.11

    0.25

    0.17

    0

    .56

    0.26

    0.16

    0.4

    3

    0.33

    0.25

    0.6

    3

    In

    0.4

    2

    0

    .42

    0.22

    0.5

    6

    0.14

    0.5

    4

    0

    .70

    0.4

    1

    0.03

    0.7

    4

    0.22

    0.3

    1

    0.24

    Mn

    0.05

    0

    .47

    0.3

    1

    0.24

    0.08

    0.3

    4

    0

    .54

    0.3

    4

    0.00

    0.4

    2

    0.38

    0.4

    2

    1.00

    Mo

    0.12

    0.25

    0.03

    0.3

    7

    0.07

    0.24

    0

    .79

    0.6

    0

    0.21

    0.6

    2

    0.04

    0.01

    0.3

    8

    Ni

    0.7

    7

    0.20

    0.6

    0

    0.3

    3

    0.09

    0.6

    1

    0

    .41

    0.4

    7

    0.2

    8

    0.09

    0.86

    0.8

    1

    0.4

    4

    Pb

    0.10

    0.08

    0.09

    0.01

    0.2

    9

    0.12

    0

    .64

    0.4

    2

    0.03

    0.3

    9

    0.35

    0.23

    0.4

    9

    Sb

    0.02

    0

    .30

    0.09

    0.3

    9

    0.05

    0.21

    0

    .79

    0.5

    4

    0.12

    0.5

    7

    0.23

    0.12

    0.3

    6

    Se

    0.02

    0.21

    0.09

    0.2

    8

    0.02

    0.13

    0

    .91

    0.6

    9

    0.19

    0.6

    8

    0.29

    0.13

    0.5

    1

    Sn

    0.11

    0.19

    0.12

    0.06

    0.3

    6

    0.06

    0

    .38

    0.14

    0.23

    0.3

    3

    0.12

    0.07

    0.3

    6

    Tl

    0.4

    3

    0

    .45

    0.20

    0.5

    2

    0.4

    1

    0.5

    6

    0

    .24

    0.15

    0.10

    0.3

    6

    0.48

    0.3

    8

    0.02

    V

    0.7

    0

    0

    .42

    0.6

    4

    0.4

    7

    0.03

    0.7

    1

    0

    .03

    0.08

    0.05

    0.3

    6

    0.65

    0.8

    6

    0.3

    6

    Zn

    0.4

    0

    0.15

    0.4

    1

    0.00

    0.4

    2

    0.15

    0

    .22

    0.25

    0.3

    0

    0.06

    0.34

    0.3

    9

    0.23

    Trace elements in loess soils 397

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    7/19

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    8/19

    Table4

    AveragecompositionofsoilhorizonsfromNord-PasdeCalaisloessdepo

    sitsandsedimentaryrocks(medianvalues)

    ,ofloessfromFrance,GreatBritain,Germ

    any,Spitsbergen,

    Kansas,Argentina,ChinaandNewZe

    aland(Worldloess,medianvalue)andofu

    ppercontinentalcrust(UCC,meanvalue)

    Nord-Pasde

    Calais

    Loess

    Surfacehorizons

    Deeph

    orizons

    21othersedimentary

    parentmaterialsa

    Worldloessb

    UCC

    Unit

    LACultivation

    AGrassland

    AForest

    BT

    S,SCorC

    Cca

    All

    Surfacehorizons

    Deephorizons

    Value(n)

    T&Mc

    Wd

    Ge

    Size

    /horizon

    38

    11

    3

    47

    39

    11

    97

    219

    390

    Al

    /gkg

    1

    41.2

    41.0

    37.6

    52.6

    50.1

    42.0

    50.3

    35.0

    36.9

    65.2(75)

    80.4

    77.4

    72.2

    Fe

    20.6

    20.1

    18.2

    29.1

    26.6

    22.5

    27.4

    20.5

    23.8

    31.5(75)

    35.0

    30.9

    39.9

    As

    /mgkg

    1

    8.5

    9.0

    10.0

    10.6

    9.7

    8.4

    10.0

    8.0

    7.6

    1.5

    2

    4.4

    Bi

    0.16

    0.15

    0.30

    0.17

    0.15

    0.14

    0.16

    0.17

    0.12

    0.127

    0.123

    0.23

    Cd

    0.41

    0.33

    0.15

    0.13

    0.11

    0.12

    0.12

    0.40

    0.10

    0.098

    0.102

    0.079

    Co

    9.2

    8.8

    4.7

    11.5

    10.6

    10.0

    11.1

    9.0

    8.5

    11.4(54)

    10

    11.6

    17

    Cr

    54

    55

    44

    68

    65

    54

    65

    51

    57

    56(42)

    35

    35

    80

    Cu

    15.8

    14.8

    13.7

    14.3

    13.9

    11.6

    13.6

    13.6

    9.3

    13.0(42)

    25

    14.3

    32

    Hg

    0.065

    0.061

    0.174

    0.031

    0.020

    0.020

    0.024

    0.061

    0.022

    0.056

    0.0123

    In

    0.038

    0.041

    0.062

    0.045

    0.041

    0.037

    0.041

    0.038

    0.031

    0.05

    0.061

    Mn

    642

    627

    302

    593

    519

    450

    523

    427

    276

    620(75)

    600

    5

    27

    774

    Mo

    0.53

    0.49

    0.93

    0.53

    0.48

    0.44

    0.50

    0.53

    0.43

    0.14(7)

    1.5

    1.4

    0.78

    Ni

    20.5

    19.1

    12.9

    28.6

    28.6

    23.4

    27.8

    18.8

    20.1

    19.5(39)

    20

    18.6

    38

    Pb

    30.3

    32.7

    71.6

    19.2

    17.8

    15.1

    18.6

    29.4

    14.6

    16.0(71)

    20

    17

    18

    Sb

    0.65

    0.76

    1.82

    0.57

    0.61

    0.50

    0.55

    0.71

    0.45

    0.2

    0.31

    0.3

    Se

    0.22

    0.29

    0.65

    0.13

    0.06

    0.05

    0.10

    0.29

    0.17

    0.05

    0.083

    0.15

    Sn

    2.17

    2.27

    3.20

    2.09

    2.01

    1.65

    2.02

    2.01

    1.46

    3.6(18)

    5.5

    2.5

    1.73

    Tl

    0.46

    0.44

    0.51

    0.51

    0.48

    0.41

    0.50

    0.39

    0.36

    0.75

    0.75

    0.47

    V

    59

    64

    53

    75

    72

    58

    72

    58

    64

    66(42)

    60

    53

    98

    Zn

    66

    68

    47

    58

    54

    43

    55

    67

    44

    55(42)

    71

    52

    70

    aFromSterckemanetal.(2002a):limes

    tones,chalks,shales,marls,clays,sandsan

    dmixedfaciesfromPrimary,Secondary,TertiaryandQuaternaryeras.

    bFromLeRiche(1973),Tayloretal.(1983),Galletetal.(1996,1998),Dingetal.

    (2001),Jahnetal.(2001)andYokooetal.

    (2004).

    cFromTaylor&McLennan(1995).

    dFromWedepohl(1995).

    eFromGaoetal.(1998).

    Trace elements in loess soils 399

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    9/19

    the Cd content is less in surface horizons under forest com-

    pared with those under permanent grassland and cultivation.

    This is consistent with the hypothesis of an exogenous Cdinput in the surface horizons varying with soil use (see next

    section).

    In the deep horizons, Cd is positively and closely correlated

    with Mn and organic C, while it shows few correlations with

    other soil characteristics, contrary to the other trace elements.

    Considering the absence of link between Cd and organic C in

    the surface horizons, and that Cd is known to generally show

    little association with organic matter in soil (Adriano, 1986;

    Alloway, 1995), the positive correlation between Cd and

    organic C in the deep horizons could be a consequence of a

    physical link between Cd and Mn, the latter being also asso-

    ciated with organic C.

    Enrichment of surface horizons

    In the deep horizons, close linear correlations exist between the

    contents of various trace elements and those of Al or Fe (Table 5).

    These relations have the general form:

    TEDH aMEDH b; 2

    where [TE] represents the concentration of a trace element (in

    mg kg1), [ME] the concentration of a reference major element

    (Al or Fe, in g kg1), DH indicates that the content refers to

    deep horizons, and a and b are the parameters of the linear

    regression (least squares method).

    If we consider that [TE]DH represents the trace elementcontent of the original soil parent material, i.e. the pedo-

    geochemical background (PGB) content, this can be estimated

    in any surface horizon ([TE]PGB/SH) assuming that:

    TEPGB=SH aMESH b; 3

    where SH indicates that the content refers to a surface horizon.

    This assumption is possible because there is generally no sig-

    nificant contamination with Al and Fe in soils. In the case of

    Cd, Hg and Se, which show no correlation with Al or Fe, the

    mean content of the deep horizon was taken as [TE]PGB/SH

    (Table 5). For Mn, Co was taken instead of Al or Fe.

    Subtracting [TE]PGB/SH from the actual trace element contentof the surface horizon ([TE]SH) gives the enrichment (ETE) of the

    surface horizon, relative to the soil parent material (Figure 6),

    expressed in mg kg1 or in percentage of [TE]PGB/SH.

    The bivariate diagrams (e.g. Figures 4a and 6) indicate that the

    surface horizons are enriched with all the trace elements deter-

    mined, except Co, Cr and Ni. In absolute values (mg kg1) and

    without distinguishing between soil use, enrichments with Mn,

    Zn, Pb, Cu and V are the greatest (median from 172 mg kg1 to

    3.32 mg kg1) (Table 6); the smallest are Se, Mo, Tl, Hg, Bi

    and In (from 0.11 mg kg1 to 0.003 mg kg1). When

    expressed relative to the pedo-geochemical background, the

    Lutum

    Al

    Fe

    Co

    Cr

    Ni

    V(15)

    0.8 0.9 1.0

    0.2

    0.1

    0.0

    0.1

    LutumV(15)

    FS

    CS

    FSa

    CSa

    org CSe(4).

    pH

    CaCO3

    CEC

    AlFe

    Mn

    Cd(1)

    CoCr

    Cu(5)

    Ni

    Pb(3)

    Zn(7)

    Mo(11)

    Sn(9)

    Sb(6)

    Tl(12)

    Bi(10)

    In(14)

    As(13)

    Hg(2)

    1.0

    1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

    0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    PC1: 32.03%

    PC2:23.71%

    org. C

    Pb(3)Sn(9)

    Sb(6)

    Hg(2)

    Se(4)

    0.5

    0.6

    0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    Figure 3 Principal components analysis of the variables measured in surface and deep horizons from loess deposits. FS, fine silt; CS, coarse silt; FSa,

    fine sand; CSa, coarse sand. The surface enrichment ranking number is in parentheses.

    400 T. Sterckeman et al.

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    10/19

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    11/19

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    12/19

    estimated from the correlation between the isotopic ratio and

    1/[Pb] in the horizon under forest (Figure 9). The results do

    not vary significantly whatever the isotopic ratio used and are

    close to the mean isotopic composition of the French

    industrial Pb emissions and of the main lead ores (Monna

    et al., 1997).

    In forest soils, the enrichments calculated by the two meth-

    ods are close. In the OF horizon EPb/Al is 120.3 mg kg1,

    Table 6 Estimated enrichment of the soil surface horizons from the Nord-Pas de Calais loess deposits with 15 elements

    All soil uses All Cultivation Grassland Forest

    Median 5th percentile 95th percentile Median 5th percentile 95th percentile Median

    /mg kg1 /% of the pedo-geochemical background /g m2

    As 0.91 1.01 3.89 10.6 13.6 49.8 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.21

    Bi 0.030 0.005 0.128 24.8 4.7 99.3 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.009

    Cd 0.26 0.09 0.52 220.4 75.3 434.8 0.080 0.085 0.050 0.001

    Cu 4.26 0.45 13.43 44.1 4.0 126.9 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.2

    Hg 0.035 0.011 0.159 106.4 33.7 482.2 0.009 0.010 0.006 0.007

    In 0.003 0.002 0.020 7.6 5.3 66.9 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002

    Mn 172 17 348 37.1 4.7 83.5 47.3 49.8 34.7 2.2

    Mo 0.10 0.00 0.39 22.9 0.3 99.3 0.022 0.029 0.022 0.030

    Pb 14.93 6.20 48.67 94.6 42.7 337.4 4.0 4.6 3.4 2.4

    Sb 0.22 0.03 0.90 42.8 5.8 196.2 0.069 0.071 0.053 0.071

    Se 0.113 0.038 0.373 94.2 32.0 311.2 0.029 0.029 0.030 0.024

    Sn 0.51 0.18 2.20 28.9 10.4 139.8 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.08

    Tl 0.049 0.001 0.117 11.6 0.1 31.6 0.012 0.015 0.009 0.006V 3.32 2.84 12.97 6.6 4.8 22.2 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.2

    Zn 18.66 4.42 38.50 41.0 11.1 87.2 5.6 6.5 3.6 0.3

    Lutum

    FS

    CS

    FSa

    pH

    Al

    FeECd

    0.9 0.8

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    org. C

    ECuEPb

    EMo

    ESn

    ESb

    EBi

    EIn

    EAs

    ESe

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

    EHg

    Lutum

    FSCS

    CSa

    org. C

    pH

    CaCO3CEC

    Al FSaFe

    ECuEPb

    EZn EV

    EMo

    ESn

    ESb

    ETl

    EBiEInEAs

    EMn

    EHgESe

    ECd

    1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

    1.0

    0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    PC1: 40.11%

    PC2:16.40%

    Figure 7 Principal components analysis of the characteristics and enrichments [expressed as ln(mass or cmol by m2)] of the surface horizons from

    loess deposits. FS, fine silt; CS, coarse silt; FSa, fine sand; CSa, coarse sand; EXX, enrichment with element XX.

    Trace elements in loess soils 403

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    13/19

    Table7

    ContentandisotopiccompositionofPbinthehorizonsoftwosolafrom

    theNord-PasdeCalaisloessdeposits

    Horizon

    Depth/cm

    Pb/mgkg

    1

    208

    Pb/206Pb

    207Pb/206Pb

    206Pb/207Pb

    208Pb/204Pb

    207Pb/204Pb

    206Pb/204Pb

    Solumundercultivation

    LA

    024

    42.4

    2.0726

    0.83990

    1.1906

    2

    38.570

    15.630

    18.609

    BT1

    2

    445

    19.3

    2.0417

    0.81930

    1.2205

    6

    38.957

    15.632

    19.080

    BT2

    4

    585

    18.6

    2.0408

    0.82000

    1.2195

    1

    38.950

    15.650

    19.086

    BC

    8

    5100

    20.2

    2.0382

    0.81987

    1.2197

    1

    38.960

    15.672

    19.115

    C1

    10

    0130

    17.6

    2.0522

    0.82315

    1.2148

    5

    39.054

    15.665

    19.031

    C2

    13

    0160

    17.2

    2.0468

    0.82247

    1.2158

    5

    38.967

    15.658

    19.038

    C3ca

    16

    0180

    15.6

    2.0499

    0.82720

    1.2088

    9

    38.764

    15.643

    18.910

    Solumunderforest

    OF

    03.5

    131.7

    2.1042

    0.86321

    1.1584

    7

    38.051

    15.610

    18.084

    A

    3.58.5

    113.5

    2.0991

    0.85837

    1.1649

    9

    38.199

    15.620

    18.197

    Esg

    8.537.5

    19.9

    2.0451

    0.82061

    1.2186

    1

    39.049

    15.669

    19.094

    SCg

    37.577.5

    18.0

    2.0513

    0.82124

    1.2176

    7

    39.141

    15.670

    19.081

    Cg

    77.5150

    16.6

    2.0511

    0.82341

    1.2144

    6

    38.964

    15.642

    18.997

    Qualitycontrol

    NBS981Pb

    referencematerial

    2.1

    677

    0.91484

    1.09308

    36.725

    15.499

    16.942

    Twostandard

    deviations(n

    17)

    0.0

    001

    0.00004

    0.00005

    0.008

    0.003

    0.004

    Referencevalues(SE)

    2.1677

    2

    0.91483

    7

    36.722

    8

    15.498

    3

    16.941

    2

    404 T. Sterckeman et al.

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    14/19

    whilst EPb/IR is 120.6 mg kg1. In the A horizon, EPb/Al is

    99.8 mg kg1, whilst EPb/IR is 92.3 mg kg1. In the LA hor-

    izon, EPb/IR is 17.3 mg kg1, i.e. about 36% less than EPb/Al

    (27.1 mg kg1). When using a greater 206Pb/207Pb ratio (here

    1.175), as suggested by the relationship between this ratio and

    1/Pb (Figure 9), EPb/IR becomes 26.5 mg kg1. Figure 9 sug-

    gests that, at least under forest, the 206Pb/207Pb ratio of the

    exogenous Pb could increase with depth, which could reveal a

    variation in exogenous Pb composition (and origin) with time.

    Semlali et al. (2001) found the 206Pb/207Pb of exogenous Pb to

    increase with depth in a French Andosol. This could be the

    consequence of the greater206

    Pb/207

    Pb of lead depositedbefore petrol lead deposition (Farmer et al., 1996, 2002).

    This might explain why the estimated isotopic composition

    of anthropogenic Pb in the LA horizon is different from that

    in the OF and A horizons (for instance a greater 206Pb/207Pb

    ratio), as the LA horizon results from mixing by ploughing of

    horizons deeper than those of the forest A horizon. However,

    it cannot be excluded that the exogenous Pb could be partly

    different in forest soils to that in cultivated soils, because of

    different sources or interceptions of the fallout. Nevertheless,

    it is reasonable to consider that the Pb enrichment in the

    surface horizons is completely due to exogenous, mostly

    anthropogenic, input.

    Comparison with continental crust and other sedimentary

    deposits

    The composition of the loess horizons is close to that of thehorizons developed in 21 other sedimentary parent materials

    from the Nord-Pas de Calais, particularly when comparing the

    deep horizons which can be considered to be uncontaminated

    (Table 4). This composition is not so very far from the average

    composition of loess deposits from various places in the world

    (Argentina, China, France, Germany, Great Britain, Kansas,

    New Zealand, Spitsbergen) calculated from the results of var-

    ious researches. A close agreement is also found when compar-

    ing the composition of the Nord-Pas de Calais loess horizons

    with those of the upper continental crust (UCC), though this

    varies according to the authors (Taylor & McLennan, 1995;

    Wedepohl, 1995; Gao et al., 1998). This is consistent with theconclusion reached by Taylor et al. (1983) and confirmed by

    Gallet et al. (1998), that the average composition of the upper

    continental crust can be obtained from aeolian deposits as well

    as from fine-grained clastic sediments.

    Enrichment factors (EF) of the loess deep horizons were

    calculated for all the elements, using the classical formula

    (see for instance Shotyk et al., 2003):

    EF EDH=REDH=EUCC=REUCC; 7

    where REis one of the reference elements, here Al and Fe, and

    UCC refers to the upper continental crust.

    0.75

    0.80

    0.85

    0.90

    0.95

    1.00

    1.05

    2.00 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.30

    208Pb/206Pb

    207Pb/206Pb

    Soils, Germany, surface horizons

    Soils, Germany, deep horizons

    Pb in gasoline, average, France

    Industrial emissions, average,France

    Aerosols, N-PdC

    Peat bogs, Norway

    Pb ores, Australia, Idaho, Canada

    Loess, N-PdC, cultivation, LA

    Loess, N-PdC, forest, OF

    Loess, N-PdC, forest, A

    Loess, N-PdC, deep horizons

    European Standard Lead Pollution(Haack et al., 2003)

    Figure 8 Relationship between 207Pb/206Pb and208Pb/206Pb in horizons from two sola in loess

    deposits and in other samples (references in the

    text). N-PdC, Nord-Pas de Calais.

    Under foresty=1.1424x+1.1531R2=0.96

    1.15

    1.16

    1.17

    1.18

    1.191.20

    1.21

    1.22

    1.23

    0 0.03 0.05 0.07

    1/[Pb] / mg1kg2

    206Pb/207P

    b

    Cultivation

    Forest

    Figure 9 Relationship between 206Pb/207Pb and 1/[Pb] in horizons

    from two sola on loess deposits.

    Trace elements in loess soils 405

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    15/19

    Enrichment factors using the composition of UCC from Gao

    et al. (1998) are closer to 1 than the EF based on the data from

    Taylor & McLennan (1995) and Wedepohl (1995) (Figure 10).

    Whatever the REand the UCC composition used, the loess soils

    from the Nord-Pas de Calais appear richer in As and Sb than

    the upper continental crust, and also seem to be slightly

    enriched with Cd. When based on the values from Taylor &

    McLennan (1995) and Wedepohl (1995), the EF indicates a

    slight enrichment with Bi, Cr, Ni and Se, which is not confirmed

    by the EF based on the data from Gao et al. (1998).

    The enrichment factors have also been calculated using the

    average composition of world loess as a reference (Figure 10).They indicate no or only slight enrichment of the Nord-Pas de

    Calais loess compared with the available data, except for Mo.

    However, the reference data for Mo come from only one loess

    deposit of Great Britain (Le Riche, 1973), analysed with a

    method which may not be comparable to the methods used

    in the other more recent work. The relative composition of

    loess from the Nord-Pas de Calais is close to that of the other

    loess from distant parts of the world. Again, this is consistent

    with the fact that loess is a representative sample of the con-

    tinental crust, more or less diluted with quartz and carbonates.

    Their ionic potentials make As, Cd, Mo and Sb relatively more

    mobile (less conservative) elements (Goldschmidt, 1958; Pedro

    & Delmas, 1970), susceptible to accumulation in sedimentary

    rocks. This may be why loess appears enriched with these

    elements in comparison with UCC.

    Bivariate diagrams give a generally positive correlation

    between Al and Fe in the various loess deposits. However,Fe/Al ratio varies according to the location of the deposit

    (Figure 11). Loess deposits from the Nord-Pas de Calais,

    together with those from France and southwestern Germany

    (Kaiserstuhl), appear to be slightly richer in Fe than those

    from the rest of the world. Whatever the deposit, the

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Al / gkg1

    Fe/gkg1

    Nord-Pas de Calais

    France

    Great Britain

    Germany

    Spitsbergen

    Kansas

    Argentina

    China

    New Zealand Figure 11 Relationship between Fe and Al con-

    tents in loess deposits from Nord-Pas de Calais,

    France, Great Britain, Germany, Spitsbergen,

    Kansas, Argentina, China and New Zealand

    (see Table 4 for sources).

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    Al Fe As Bi Cd Co Cr Cu Hg In Mn Mo Ni Pb Sb Se Sn Tl V Zn

    EFAl

    UCC, Taylor & McLennan, 1995

    UCC, Wedepohl, 1995

    UCC, Gao et al., 1998

    World loess depositsSedimentary rocks from N-PdC

    Figure 10 Average enrichment factors (EFAl) of

    elements in deeper horizons from loess deposits,

    against different materials, using Al as reference

    element. UCC, upper continental crust; N-PdC,

    Nord-Pas de Calais.

    406 T. Sterckeman et al.

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    16/19

    correlations between Fe and Al show negative y-axis inter-

    cepts, indicating an impoverishment in Fe. This could be the

    consequence of sedimentary differentiation and the moderate

    chemical weathering undergone by the loess protoliths (Gallet

    et al., 1998). These differentiation and weathering processes

    might have been slightly weaker in northwestern Europe thanin the other parts of the Earths surface.

    There is often a close correlation between Al and most of the

    trace element contents in the loess deep horizons from the

    Nord-Pas de Calais (Table 4). In the other loess deposits, the

    correlation is generally not as good and does not fit that found

    in the Nord-Pas de Calais horizons (Figure 12a). However,

    several trace element contents from the various deposits corre-

    late with Fe more uniformly, as if there were a unique relation-

    ship between the Fe and TE of the loess from various regions

    of the Earths surface. Figure 12(b) illustrates this phenom-

    enon in the case of Zn and is similar to that observed for Co,

    Cu, Pb and V. These elements behave more like Fe than Al

    and could be more associated with iron (oxy-)hydroxides than

    with phyllosilicates. Chromium content appears to be more

    closely correlated to Al than to Fe (Figure 13). In this case, as

    well as in the case of Ni and Sn, loess from Argentina, Kansas,

    Spitsbergen and New Zealand does not fall along with the

    correlations with Al or with Fe. This connects with the Nd

    and Sr isotopic compositions measured by Gallet et al. (1998),

    which clearly distinguished the Argentinean loess from the

    other deposits they studied. The rare earth elements and theisotopic results from these authors indicate a significant con-

    tribution of young Andean volcanic rocks to the Argentinean

    loess deposits, whereas multi-recycled and well-mixed ancient

    sediments are the principal sources for the other loess deposits.

    Note that the New Zealand loess rests upon two eroded vol-

    canoes of basaltic composition (Taylor et al., 1983).

    The manganese content clearly does not correlate with that of

    Al or Fe because of its great mobility (Pedro & Delmas, 1970).

    However, Mn varies similarly in the different loess deposits. No

    data were available about the As, Bi, Cd, Hg, In, Sb, Se and Tl

    contents of loess from the other parts of the world. If loess

    deposits from the Nord-Pas de Calais are considered to derive

    from sedimentary rocks similar to those found in this region, EFs

    based on these sediments average composition show that loess is

    not enriched with As, Sb and Cd, nor with any other element.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Zn

    /gkg1

    Zn/gkg1

    Fe / gkg1

    AI / gkg1

    (a)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

    Nord-Pas de Calais

    France

    Great BritainGermany

    Spitsbergen

    Kansas

    Argentina

    China

    New Zealand

    (b)

    Figure 12 Relationship between Zn content

    and (a) Al content, (b) Fe content in loess

    deposits from Nord-Pas de Calais, France,

    Great Britain, Germany, Spitsbergen, Kansas,

    Argentina, China and New Zealand (see Table

    4 for sources).

    Trace elements in loess soils 407

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    17/19

    They show an impoverishment in Se, due to the large Se content

    in some peat horizons fromthe region (Sterckeman etal., 2002a).

    These results suggest that the ratios between trace element

    contents and those of Al or Fe in deep loess horizons from

    northern France (Table 8) give an acceptable characterization

    of the pedo-geochemical background of soils developed in

    most sedimentary rocks from northwestern Europe.

    Conclusions

    In the north of France, the contents of the least mobile ele-

    ments in the deep horizons of soils from loess deposits are

    close to those in the upper continental crust. In contrast, loess

    appears to be enriched with mobile elements, such as As or Cd.

    The composition of Nord-Pas de Calais loess is close to that of

    loess from other parts of the world (the rest of France, Great

    Britain, Germany, Spitsbergen, Kansas, Argentina, China,

    New Zealand). However, whatever the mobility of the element,

    the average composition of the loess from the Nord-Pas de

    Calais is closer to that of the 21 other sedimentary rocks of the

    region than to that of the loess from the rest of the world. Our

    results highlight the fact that, to some extent, loess composi-

    tion reflects the composition of the various rocks it is derived

    from, which can be slightly different from those of the upper

    continental crust.

    In the deep horizons, Bi, Co, Cr, Cu, In, Ni, Pb, Sn, Tl, V and

    Zn are associated with phyllosilicates and, probably even moreclosely, with iron oxy-hydroxides of the fine fraction. This is

    suggested by the correlation of these element contents (except

    Cr and Sn) with Fe, which is closer than that with Al, when

    considering the loess deposits from the rest of the world. More

    mobile elements such as As, Cd, Hg, Mn, Mo, Sb and Se seem

    less or unassociated with these carrying phases. Cadmium, as

    well as Co, seems to be particularly linked to Mn. The distribu-

    tion of trace element/Al or trace element/Fe in loess could be

    used as an estimate of the background contents for soils devel-

    oped from most of the sedimentary materials in the north of

    France and also in northwestern Europe.

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Cr/gkg1

    Cr/gkg1

    Fe / gkg1

    AI / gkg1

    (a)

    (b)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

    Nord-Pas de Calais

    France

    Great Britain

    Germany

    Spitsbergen

    Kansas

    Argentina

    China

    New Zealand

    Figure 13 Relationship between Cr content and

    (a) Al content, (b) Fe content in loess deposits

    from Nord-Pas de Calais, France, Great

    Britain, Germany, Spitsbergen, Kansas,

    Argentina, China and New Zealand (see Table

    4 for sources).

    408 T. Sterckeman et al.

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    18/19

    Surface horizons are enriched with exogenous input of all the

    trace elements examined, except Co, Cr and Ni. Isotopic com-

    position demonstrates that Pb enrichment is almost totally due

    to human contamination through atmospheric fallout fromvarious emission sources. Enrichments with Cd, Cu, Mn and

    Zn are greater in cultivated soils than in forest soils.

    Enrichments with Pb and with Cu, Hg, Mo, Sb, Se and Sn are

    due mainly to human contamination through atmospheric fall-

    out. Humic substances seem to act as a sink for all these

    exogenous elements.

    Acknowledgements

    We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Conseil

    Re gional du Nord Pas de Calais and of the Ministe` re de

    lAme nagement du Territoire et de lEnvironnement.

    References

    Acade mie des Sciences 1998. Contamination des sols par les elements en

    traces: les risques et leur gestion. Rapport No. 42, Institut de France,

    Paris.

    Adriano, D.C. 1986. Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment.

    Springer-Verlag, New York.

    AFES 1998. A sound reference base for soils: The Referentiel

    Pedologique (in English). INRA Editions, Paris.

    Alloway, B.J. 1995. Cadmium. In: Heavy Metals in Soils (ed.

    B.J. Alloway), pp. 122151. Blackie Academic & Professional,

    Glasgow.

    BIPEA 2000. Analyse de terre. Resultats des circuits mensuels. BureauInterprofessionnel dEtudes Analytiques, Gennevillers.

    Chiaradia, M. & Cupelin, F. 2000. Behaviour of airborne lead and

    temporal variations of its source effects in Geneva (Switzerland):

    comparison of anthropogenic versus natural processes. Atmospheric

    Environment, 34, 959971.

    Chow, T.J., Snyder, C.B. & Earl, J.L. 1975. Isotope ratios of lead as

    pollutant source indicators. In: United Nations FAO and International

    Atomic Energy Association Symposium (IAEA SM 191/4),

    pp. 95108. IAEA, Vienna.

    Ding, Z.L., Sun, J.M., Yang, S.L. & Liu, T.S. 2001. Geochemistry

    of the Pliocene red clay formation in the Chinese Loess Plateau

    and implications for its origin, source provenance and paleoclimate

    change. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 65, 901913.

    Dunlap, C.E., Steinnes, E. & Flegal, A.R. 1999. A synthesis of lead

    isotopes in two millennia of European air. Earth and Planetary

    Science Letters, 167, 8188.

    Emmanuel, S. & Erel, Y. 2002. Implications from concentrations and

    isotopic data for Pb partitioning processes in soils. Geochimica et

    Cosmochimica Acta, 66, 25172527.

    Farmer, J.G., Eades, L.J., MacKenzie, A.B., Kirita, A. & Bailey-

    Watts, T. 1996. Stable lead isotope record of lead pollution in

    Loch Lomond sediments since 1630 A.D. Environmental Science

    and Technology, 30, 30803083.

    Farmer, J.G., Eades, L.J., Atkins, H. & Chamberlain, D.F. 2002.

    Historical trends in the lead isotopic composition of archival

    Table 8 Distribution parameters of the ratios between trace element contents (in mg kg1) and Al or Fe contents (in g kg1) in deep soil horizons

    from Nord-Pas de Calais loess deposits

    [Element]/[Al] [Element]/[Fe]

    Element Arithmetic mean Median 5th percentile 95th percentile Arithmetic mean Median 5th percentile 95th percentile

    Al 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 1.85 1.71 2.08

    Fe 0.54 0.54 0.48 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

    As 0.20 0.20 0.14 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.27 0.44

    Bi 0.0033 0.0033 0.0027 0.0039 0.0061 0.0060 0.0051 0.0071

    Cd 0.0024 0.0024 0.0013 0.0038 0.0046 0.0046 0.0023 0.0072

    Co 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.27 0.41 0.40 0.35 0.49

    Cr 1.30 1.29 1.16 1.43 2.42 2.42 2.18 2.74

    Cu 0.27 0.27 0.22 0.31 0.50 0.50 0.41 0.58

    Hg 0.0007 0.0005 0.0002 0.0027 0.0012 0.0009 0.0004 0.0052

    In 0.0009 0.0009 0.0007 0.0010 0.0016 0.0016 0.0014 0.0019

    Mn 10.6 10.8 6.0 16.3 19.8 19.9 10.8 28.8

    Mo 0.010 0.010 0.008 0.012 0.019 0.019 0.015 0.022

    Ni 0.56 0.56 0.46 0.65 1.03 1.03 0.86 1.23Pb 0.37 0.37 0.33 0.42 0.69 0.68 0.59 0.82

    Sb 0.011 0.011 0.008 0.014 0.021 0.021 0.015 0.026

    Se 0.0024 0.0021 0.0010 0.0051 0.0044 0.0038 0.0017 0.0099

    Sn 0.040 0.040 0.036 0.044 0.075 0.074 0.067 0.082

    Tl 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.011 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.021

    V 1.43 1.43 1.29 1.55 2.65 2.65 2.44 2.85

    Zn 1.09 1.09 0.97 1.21 2.04 2.03 1.73 2.39

    Trace elements in loess soils 409

    # 2006 British Society of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 392410

  • 8/14/2019 European Journal of Soil Science, June 2006,

    19/19

    Sphagnum mosses from Scotland (18382000). Environmental

    Science and Technology, 36, 152157.

    Gallet, S., Jahn, B.-M. & Torii, M. 1996. Geochemical characteriza-

    tion of the Luochuan loesspaleosol sequence, China, and paleocli-

    matic implications. Chemical Geology, 133, 6788.

    Gallet, S., Jahn, B.-M., Van Vliet Lanoe, B., Dia, A. & Rossello, E.

    1998. Loess geochemistry and its implications for particle origin and

    composition of the upper continental crust. Earth and Planetary

    Science Letters, 156, 157172.

    Gao, S.,Luo, T.-C.,Zhang, B.-R., Zhang, H.-F.,Han, Y.-W., Zhao, Z.-D.

    & Hu, Y.-K. 1998. Chemical composition of the continental crust as

    revealed by studies in East China. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,

    62, 19591975.

    Goldschmidt, V.M. 1958. Geochemistry. The International Series of

    Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, London.

    Haack, U.K., Heinrichs, H., Gutsche, F.H. & Plessow, K. 2003.

    The isotopic composition of anthropogenic Pb in soil profiles

    of Northern Germany: Evidence for pollutant Pb from a continent-

    wide mixing system. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 150, 113134.

    Holmgren, G.G.S., Meyer, M.W., Chaney, R.L. & Daniels, R.B. 1993.Cadmium, lead, zinc, copper, and nickel in agricultural soils of the

    United States of America. Journal of Environmental Quality, 22, 335348.

    ISSS 1998. World Reference Base for Soil Resources: Introduction (eds

    J.A. Deckers, F.O. Nachtergaele & O.C. Spaargaren). ISSS, ISRIC

    and FAO, Leuven.

    Jahn, B.-M., Gallet, S. & Han, J. 2001. Geochemistry of the Xining,

    Xifeng and Jixian sections, Loess Plateau of China: eolian dust

    provenance and paleosol evolution during the last 140 ka.

    Chemical Geology, 178, 7194.

    Jamagne, M., Lautridou, J.-P. & Somme , J. 1981. Pre liminaire a` une

    synthe` se sur les variations se dimentologiques des loess de la France du

    Nord-Ouest dans le cadre stratigraphique et paleogeographique. Bulletin

    de la Societe Geologique de France, 23, 143147.

    Juillot, F. 1998. Localisation et speciation de larsenic, du plomb, et du

    zinc dans des sites et sols contamines. Comparaison avec un sol

    developpe sur une anomalie geochimique naturelle en plomb. PhD

    thesis, Universite Paris 7 Denis-Diderot, Paris.

    Le Riche, H.H. 1973. The distribution of minor elements among the

    components of soil developed in loess. Geoderma, 9, 4357.

    Manhe` s, G., Alle` gre, C.J., Dupre , B. & Hamelin, B. 1980. Lead iso-

    tope study of basicultrabasic layered complexes: speculations

    about the age of the Earth and primitive mantle characteristics.

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 47, 370382.

    Monna, F., Lancelot, J., Croudace, I.W., Cundy, A.B. & Lewis, J.T.

    1997. Pb isotopic composition of airborne particulate material

    from France and the Southern United Kingdom: implications for

    Pb pollution sources in urban areas. Environmental Science andTechnology, 31, 22772286.

    Paepe, R. & Somme , J. 1970. Les loess et la stratigraphie du

    Ple istoce` ne re cent dans le Nord de la France et en Belgique.

    Annales de la Societe Geologique du Nord, 90, 191201.

    Pe dro, G. & Delmas, A.B. 1970. Les principes ge ochimiques de la

    distribution des e le ments-traces dans les sols. Annales

    Agronomiques, 21, 483518.

    Plant, J.A., Klaver, G., Locutura, J., Salminen, R., Vrana, K. &

    Fordyce, F.M. 1997. The forum of European geological surveys

    geochemistry task group inventory 19941996. Journal of

    Geochemical Exploration, 59, 123146.

    Sanford, R.F., Pierson, C.T. & Crovelli, R.A. 1993. An objective

    replacement method for censored geochemical data. Mathematical

    Geology, 25, 5980.

    Semlali, R.M., Van Oort, F., Denaix, L. & Loubet, M. 2001.

    Estimating distributions of endogenous and exogenous Pb in soils

    by using Pb isotopic ratios. Environmental Science and Technology,

    35, 41804188.

    Shotyk, W., Goodsite, M.E., Roos-Barraclough, F., Frei, R.,

    Heinemeier, J., Asmund, G. et al. 2003. Anthropogenic

    contributions to atmospheric Hg, Pb and As accumulation recorded

    by peat from southern Greenland and Denmark dated using 14C

    bomb pulse curve. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67,

    39914011.

    Smith, K.A. & Paterson, J.E. 1995. Manganese and cobalt. In: Heavy

    Metals in Soils (ed. B.J. Alloway), pp. 224244. Blackie Academic &

    Professional, Glasgow.

    StatSoft 2002. STATISTICA. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK.

    Steinnes, E. 2003. Biogeochemical cycling of selenium: atmospheric

    supply of Se from the marine to the terrestrial environment. In: 7th

    International Conference on the Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements(eds G.R. Gobran & N.W. Lepp), pp. 3637. Uppsala.

    Sterckeman, T. 2004. Caracterisation du fond geochimique en elements

    en traces dans les sols issus de roches sedimentaires du Nord de la

    France. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine,

    Vandoeuvre-le` s-Nancy.

    Sterckeman, T., Douay, F., Fourrier, H. & Proix, N. 2002a.

    Referentiel pedo-geochimique du Nord-Pas de Calais. Institut

    National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut Superieur

    dAgriculture, Lille.

    Sterckeman, T., Douay, F., Proix, N., Fourrier, H. & Perdrix, E.

    2002b. Assessment of the contamination of cultivated soils by eigh-

    teen trace elements around smelters in the North of France. Water,

    Air, and Soil Pollution, 135, 173194.

    STIPA 1982. Syste`me de Transfert de lInformation Pedologique et

    Agronomique. Notice pour lentree des descriptions et analyses de

    sols en banque de donnees. INRAIRAT, Paris.

    Taylor, S.R. & McLennan, S.M. 1995. The geochemical evolution of

    the continental crust. Reviews of Geophysics, 33, 241265.

    Taylor, S.R., McLennan, S.M. & McCulloch, M.T. 1983.

    Geochemistry of loess, continental crustal composition and crustal

    model ages. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 47, 18971905.

    Van Dijk, D., Uittenbogaard, J., Pellen, P. & Brader, A. 2001.

    International Soil-Analytical Exchange. Report 2000. Department

    of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen.

    Ve ron, A., Flament, P., Bertho, M.L., Alleman, L., Flegal, R. &

    Hamelin, B. 1999. Isotopic evidence of pollutant lead

    sources in Northwestern France. Atmospheric Environment, 33,33773388.

    Wedepohl, K.H. 1995. The composition of the continental crust.

    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 12171232.

    White, W.M., Albare` de, F. & Te louk, P. 2000. High-precision analysis

    of Pb isotope ratios by multi-collector ICPMS. Chemical Geology,

    167, 257270.

    Yokoo, Y., Nakano, T., Nishikawa, M. & Quan, H. 2004.

    Mineralogical variation of SrNd isotopic and elemental composi-

    tions in loess and desert sand from the central Loess Plateau in

    China as a provenance tracer of wet and dry deposition in the

    northwestern Pacific. Chemical Geology, 204, 4562.

    410 T. Sterckeman et al.