european operational concept validation methodology e-ocvm version 3: what’s new episode 3 - caats...
TRANSCRIPT
European Operational Concept Validation Methodology
E-OCVM Version 3: What’s New
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
Matthias PoppeDFSEpisode 3
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
2
Brief History
• Why do we need an Operational Concept Validation methodology? “To improve the transfer from R&D to operations… a
common ATM validation methodology is needed”(B. van Houtte, L. Breslin, B. Redeborn, April 2005)
• Version 1 and 2 of the E-OCVM define this common methodology Concept Lifecycle Model (V0, V1, …) Structured Planning Framework (Strategy, Plan, Report) Case Based Approach (Safety, Human Factors, …)
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
3
Version 3: What’s New?
• Main new aspects are Emphasis towards integrated Concept Development
Lifecycle Assessment of concept maturity and lifecycle transitions Management of stakeholder expectations through cases
• Methodology Version 3 continues to be a framework for R&D conduct It extends version 2 based on previous experience, e.g.
Lessons Learnt from Episode 3- To better address large scale validation- Involving complex concepts with performance targets- Addresses the need to construct a sound basis for decision
making
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
4
Concept Development Lifecycle
Emphasis on Integrated Approach: Link between Validation, Verification and Concept Definition
V0 V1 V2 V3
What evidence & maturity becomes available at what stage?Can we do the transition to the next phase?
V1 ScopeV2 FeasibilityV3 Integration
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
5
Maturity and Transitions
• Maturity Assessment process is being defined Manage the progress from ATM Needs to
Implementation- Identify research needs, define performance targets- Includes project monitoring and steering
At exercise level decide of what has to be done next- Ensure meeting the transition criteria for the next phase- Definition of studies, validation exercises
• Detailed transition criteria Vn to Vn+1 available Based on R&D needs and key questions to be answered
- Example: V2-V3 Operational viability (User acceptance, safety analysis, Human Factors) reached?
Evidence comes from validation exercises and case development
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
6
Case Development Cycle
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Business Case
V1
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Business Case
V2
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Business Case
V3
Exercise 2
V1
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Business Case
V1
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Case
Business Case
V1
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Business Case
V2
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Case
Business Case
V2
Environmental Case
Safety Case
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Business Case
V3
Environmental Case
Safety Case
-Human FactorCase
Business Case
V3
V1
Exercise Outputs
Direction for exercises
Exercises1…n
V1 V2V3
ValidationRepository
Exercise results feed into individual cases
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
7
Cases Improvements
• Main Objective: Providing key stakeholders with targeted information Developed along the concept lifecycle in iterations Key input for deciding priorities in exercise design
• Detailed guidance material available from CAATS II and EUROCONTROL: Safety Case Environment Case Human Factors Case Standards and Regulatory Case Business Case
Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009
Ep
isod
e 3
- C
AA
TS
II Fin
al D
isse
min
ati
on E
vent
8
Thank you!