evaluating the quality of open access content

18
SPARC and ACRL Annual Forum brian m. bot | sage bionetworks | @BrianMBot evaluating the quality of open access content

Upload: brian-bot

Post on 20-Feb-2017

120 views

Category:

Science


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: evaluating the quality of open access content

SPARC and ACRL Annual Forum

brian m. bot | sage bionetworks | @BrianMBot

evaluating the quality of open access content

Page 2: evaluating the quality of open access content

Sage Bionetworks

a non-profit organization which pilots a variety of components that are necessary

to build a scientific research commons

focused on a world where biomedical research will fundamentally change to be

more open and collaborative

supports communities of researchers working collaboratively across disciplines

Page 3: evaluating the quality of open access content

accessopen

Page 4: evaluating the quality of open access content

accessibility

Page 5: evaluating the quality of open access content

accessopen

Page 6: evaluating the quality of open access content

dataopen

Page 7: evaluating the quality of open access content

scienceopen

Page 8: evaluating the quality of open access content

science

Page 9: evaluating the quality of open access content

Synapse enabling large-scale collaborative science

enables sharing of all digital assets (data, code, results) and their relationships to one another

multi-channel communication instead of uni-directional broadcasting

aides in reproducibility by enabling communication throughout the research process

not only at time of publication

Page 10: evaluating the quality of open access content

Synapse enabling large-scale collaborative science

CRC Subtyping Consortium

DREAM ChallengesProgenitor Cell Biology Consortium

TCGA Pan-Cancer Consortium

CommonMind ConsortiumInteractome

CTDD

Superheroes Project

Influenza Vaccinations

Craniosynostosis Psychosis Spectrum Disorder

Oncology Molecular Classifiers

Next Gen Scientific Publishing

Open Science

Page 11: evaluating the quality of open access content

Synapse enabling large-scale collaborative science

collaboration around common questionDREAM Challenges

collaboration around common dataTCGA Pan-Cancer Consortium

Page 12: evaluating the quality of open access content

DREAM Challenges

Page 13: evaluating the quality of open access content

challenge assisted peer review

DREAM Challenges

Page 14: evaluating the quality of open access content

Synapse enabling large-scale collaborative science

collaboration around common questionDREAM Challenges

collaboration around common dataTCGA Pan-Cancer Consortium

Page 15: evaluating the quality of open access content

Cyriac Kandoth

TCGA Pan-Cancer Consortium

Page 16: evaluating the quality of open access content

TCGA Pan-Cancer Consortium

Page 17: evaluating the quality of open access content

scientific method1. define a question

2. gather information and resources (background research)

3. form a hypothesis

8. retest (frequently done by other scientists)

4. test hypothesis experimentally

5. analyze experimental data

7. publish results

6. draw conclusions based on data

Page 18: evaluating the quality of open access content

finitein

∞...