evaluation aerosol cci satellite retrievals macc assimilations reading 2012

44
evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

Upload: grace-flynn

Post on 29-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

evaluation

aerosol CCI satellite retrievals

MACC assimilations

Reading 2012

Page 2: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

the participants / the task

• AATSR F v142• AATSR O v202/v2q2• AATSR S v040/v031• MERIS A v21• MERIS B v11• MERIS E 802• PARASOL v30

• MODIS_aqua c5.1

• MODIS_terrac5.1

• SEAWIFS• MISR v31• FBOV AOD (MODIS)• FMNG AOD & fine-fr

• evaluate for the year

2008 daily global AOD

and Angstrom data of

– aerosol-CCI retrievals

– MACC assimilations

• compare to

– AERONET / MAN

– MODIS (AOD)

Page 3: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

the scoring concept

• rescale all data to a common 1x1 lat/lon grid

– establish 1x1 gridded AERONET daily data)

• identify local data pairs (satellite/model test

data versus AERONET reference data)

• require 10+ days with 10+ sites (spatial test) or

10+ sites with 10+ temporal records (time test)

to evaluate bias and correlation in any region

• both, a valid spatial score and a valid temporal

score, are required for a valid regional score

Page 4: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

scoring steps

• establish regional scores (1: best, 0: poor)

– step1regional spatial score for each day• (rank) correlation and (rank) bias

– step2regional temporal score for each 1x1 • (rank) correlation and (rank) biast

– step3combined regional score• total score = bias * spat.corr * temp.corr

– step4combine regional to one global score• ‘single score’ from regional total scores

• investigated properties: AOD550, Angstrom

Page 5: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

error / bias evaluation

• explore– total error = (1 - |score, total|)– bias error = (1 - |score, bias|)– spatial error = (1 - score, space)– temporal error = (1 - score, time)

score, total = score, bias * score, space * score, time

– bias•general direction ( + > test-data / - < test-data )•absolute bias (IQ test-data minus IQ reference)

• test vs AERONET: AOD, Angstrom• test vs MODIS, terra: AOD

Page 6: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AOD scores vs AERONET

global land ocean• MODIS A/T .63 .59 .66• AATSR S v40 -.60 .63 -.61• FMNG -.59 -.54 -.62• FBOV .57 .55 .59• AATSR O v202 -.56 -.56 -.58• MISR .53 .58 .53• AATSR F v142 -.52 -.56 -.53• AATSR S v31 -.48 -.56 -.47• MERIS ESA 802 .45 .48• MERIS B v11 .42 .35 .46• SEAWIFS -.41 -.37 -.45• PARASOL .64• MERIS A 21 .49

based on a10+ sample statistics

absolutelarger scoreis better

+/- sign for overall bias

Page 7: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AOD score detail vs AERONET

global land ocean

• FBOV– total score .57 .55 .59– seasonal score .83 .82 .84– bias score .84 .86 .84– spatial score .82 .77 .84

• FMNG– total score -.59 -.54 -.62– seasonal score .82 .81 .84– bias score -.88 -.86 -.91– spatial score .81 .77 .81

10 + events

Page 8: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

Angstrom scores vs AERONET

global land ocean• AATSR S v40 .60 .56 .65• FBOV .56 .55 .55• FMNG .48 -.49 .48• AATSR S v31 .52 .47 .57• AATSR F v142 .47 .51 .47• AATSR O v202 .41 .38 .43• MISR .38 .43 .37• MERIS ESA 802 . 38 .34 .37• PARASOL .44• MERIS A 21 .33

based on a10+ sample statistics

absolutelarger scoreis better

+/- sign for overall bias

Page 9: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

ANG score detail vs AERONET

global land ocean

• FBOV– total score .56 .55 .55– seasonal score .82 .80 .82– bias score .81 .84 .80– spatial score .84 .83 .85

• FMNG– total score .48 -.49 .48– seasonal score .73 .73 .72– bias score .85 -.85 .86– spatial score .77 .79 .77

10 + events

Page 10: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

assimilation data performance

• regional error assessment

– vs AERONET AOD

– vs MODIS-AOD

– vs AERONET Angstrom

Page 11: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

ECMWF AOD

FBOV (single assim.) FMNG (dual assim.)

Page 12: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

FBOV AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 13: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

FMNG AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 14: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

2ass … minus … 1 ass

improvement deteriation

Page 15: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

FBOV AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 16: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

FMNG AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 17: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

2ass … minus … 1 ass

improvement deteriation

Page 18: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

ECMWF Angstrom

FBOV (single assim.) FMNG (dual assim.)

Page 19: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

FBOV ANG performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 20: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

FNMG ANG performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 21: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

2ass … minus … 1 ass

improvement deteriation

Page 22: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

satellite data performance

• regional error assessment

– vs AERONET AOD

– vs MODIS-AOD

Page 23: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

the participants / the task

• AATSR F v142• AATSR O v202/v2q2• AATSR S v040/v031• MERIS A v21• MERIS B v11• MERIS E 802• PARASOL v30

• MODIS_aqua c5.1

• MODIS_terrac5.1

• SEAWIFS• MISR v31

• evaluate daily global

‘CCI-aerosol’ retrievals

– for the entire year 2008• AOD 550nm• Angstrom (if offered)

• versus AERONET / MAN

• performance in context

of established retrievals

Page 24: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

data content AOD year 2008

MISR

MODIS TERRA

PARASOL

MERIS-ESA

MERIS-BAER

MERIS-ALAMO

ATSR-SU

ATSR ORAC

ATSR ADV

Page 25: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

data volume AOD 1/1/2008

MODIS AQUA

MISR

PARASOL

MERIS-ESA

MERIS-BAER

MERIS-ALAMO

ATSR-SU

ATSR ORAC

ATSR ADV

MODIS TERRA

Page 26: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MODIS TERRA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– albsolute

Page 27: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MODIS AQUA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 28: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MISR AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 29: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

POLDER AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 30: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MERIS ESA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 31: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MERIS BEAR AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 32: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MERIS ALAMO AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 33: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR SU40 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 34: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR SU31 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 35: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR O202 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 36: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR O202iq AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

effectively ‘identical to O202

Page 37: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR ADV142 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 38: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR SU40 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

MODIS terra

Page 39: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR O202 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

MODIS terra

Page 40: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

AATSR ADV142 AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

MODIS terra

Page 41: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

POLDER AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 42: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MERIS ESA AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 43: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MERIS BEAR AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute

Page 44: Evaluation aerosol CCI satellite retrievals MACC assimilations Reading 2012

MERIS ALAMO AOD performance

• total error

– bias

– spatial

– temporal

• bias

– tendency

– absolute