evaluation for pr and event management agencies
DESCRIPTION
Evaluation form for assessing public relations and event management agencies in their pitch for your job. This is a useful tool which you can use during pitching presentations toTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evaluation for PR and Event Management Agencies](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100605/559b183a1a28ab82308b4866/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TDM Golden Jubilee ProgrammeAgency Evaluation
Agency Name:
Evaluator: Abel Ahing
Evaluation Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Background and objectives
1
Good understanding of our objectives and what need to be done to
achieve them.
2
Understands how we will know if our objectives are met or not, and
will evaluate the programme.
3
Clearly shows how the programme will elevate TDM's perceived
value, generate PR mileage and build emotional connection.
Creative proposal
4 The ideas are practical, effective and value for money.
5
The agency's "big idea" for the programme can clearly be
implemented by its proposed activities and engagement channels.
6
Ideas are creative, unique and inspiring - they tell our story and
deliver key messages effectively.
7
Program activities capture attention, attract widespread
participation and engagement, memorable and build emotional
connection with the target audience.
8 The activities are lined up to build momentum over time.
9
Content delivery is coordinated with the proposed activities and
orchestrated across channels to maximise impact.
Target audience insight and engagement strategy
10 Has in-depth understanding of our target audience.
11
The agency's understanding of the target audience underlines a
powerful communication and engagement strategy.
12
Uses the most cost-effective communication medium, content
delivery and engagement channels for each target audience.
Po
or
Ou
tsta
nd
ing
Sati
sfac
tory
Rating
Page 1 of 3
![Page 2: Evaluation for PR and Event Management Agencies](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100605/559b183a1a28ab82308b4866/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TDM Golden Jubilee ProgrammeAgency Evaluation
Agency Name:
Evaluator: Abel Ahing
Evaluation Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Po
or
Ou
tsta
nd
ing
Sati
sfac
tory
Rating
Presentation
13 The presentation was delivered clearly and professionally.
14 Our questions were clearly answered.
15
Presentation documentation was well-produced and provided a good
summary and rationale for their recommendations.
Compatibility
16
Has proven track record with clients in the same or similar industry as
TDM.
17
The agency's personnel are easy to get along with and there is likely
to be a cultural fit between us.
18
Forthcoming in what its services are in-house and what are
outsourced.
Company strength
19The agency has records that prove it can achieve desired results.
20
Has strong customer references and feedbacks, and allows our team
to speak with past customers about their experiences.
21 Has good writers to aid content creation.
22
Own talent such as graphic designers and front-end developers on
hand who can create digital experiences.
23
The agency has solid network to outsource work it can't complete in-
house.
Accountability and measurement
24
The agency defines the Return of Investment (ROI) for its proposed
programme.
25 Sets defined targets and measurable goals to be achieved.
26
Clear about how the goals and outcomes that it has defined will be
achieved.
Pricing and value
27 The agency's pricing reflects the value we will receive.
Page 2 of 3
![Page 3: Evaluation for PR and Event Management Agencies](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100605/559b183a1a28ab82308b4866/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TDM Golden Jubilee ProgrammeAgency Evaluation
Agency Name:
Evaluator: Abel Ahing
Evaluation Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Po
or
Ou
tsta
nd
ing
Sati
sfac
tory
Rating
Overall
What did this agency do that was markedly better than the other
agencies?
What did any/all of the other agencies do that was markedly better
than this agency?
What was the single most important factor in this agency winning /
not winning the business?
Page 3 of 3