evaluation method regarding the effectof building design in the context ofsustainable development

8/6/2019 EVALUATION METHOD REGARDING THE EFFECTOF BUILDING DESIGN IN THE CONTEXT OFSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

1/23

September 2007

EVALUATION METHOD REGARDING THE EFFECTOF BUILDING DESIGN IN THE CONTEXT OF

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

G.-F. SARGENTISK. BARTSIOKA

N. SYMEONIDIS

K. HADJIBIROS

NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS

Faculty of Civil EngineeringDept. of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering


2/23

INTRODUCTION

METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Parameters Analysis and models Calculations and evaluation

CONCLUSIONS


3/23

INTRODUCTION


4/23

Construction Extremely polluting

Sustainable andenvironmentallyfriendly technologies

Positive results

Technical knowledge of sustainable solutions


5/23

Relation between built environment and ecosystem

Waste

Energy

loss Toxicity

Raw material Water

Energy

BUILTENVIRONMENT

INPUT

OUTPUT

Ecosystem


6/23

Collection of raw materialsIndustrial process

Construction

Use of buildingDemolition

Throw out-Rebuild-Reuse

Life cycleanalysis of

building

Method Evaluation of building design

Crucial parameters of design Environmental impact


7/23

METHOD OF ANALYSIS


8/23

Raw materials

Energy

Embodied energy

Energy of use

Toxicity

Recycling

1

2

3

Parameters

Materials


9/23

Parameters

1. Materials

Raw materials

Recycled materials


10/23

Parameters

2. Energy

Embodied energy

Energy of use


11/23

Parameters

3. Toxicity

Stages to examine toxicity and pollutant emission


12/23

Buildings of similar geometrical characteristics ground floor, 60,5m2 but constructed withdifferent techniques and materials are being compared.

Model 1. Typical contemporaryconstruction

Model 2. Bioclimatic construction

Model 3. Plinth construction Model 4. Natural stoneconstruction

Analysis and models


13/23

Calculations and evaluation


14/23



15/23

Calculations and evaluationRECYCLING ASPECTS OF MODELS 1, 2

5%

95%

recycling no recycling

RECYCLING ASPECTS OF MODEL 3

55%

45%



35%

65%


0

20

40

60

80

100

model 1 model 2 model 3 model 4

RAW MATERIALS USED MATERIALS

Table and data


16/23


0 20 40 60 80 100

model 1

model 2

model 3

model 4

Table and data


17/23

267968.5

302459.9

69557.8

143880.9

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

MJ

Calculations and evaluation3 6999 ,41

28 792,4

6 558,0 3

135 4,03 20 38,3

49 ,91

8 291,7 7

0,0 0

5 000,0 0

10 000,0 0

15 000,0 0

20 000,0 0

25 000,0 0

30 000,0 0

35 000,0 0

40 000,0 0

EMBODIED

ENERGY

(KWh)

Conc re te S te e l Wa l l Alum in ium Gla s s Wo o d Rubble -Ston e s fo r the roo f

MATERIALS OF BIOCLIMATIC BUILT

Table and data

Materials of bioclimatic building


18/23


J F M A M J J A S O N D

0.00.0

400.0

400.0

800.0

800.0

1200.0

1200.0

1600.0

1600.0

kWh

2000.0

MONTHLY HEATING/ COOLING LOADS - All Visible The rma lZone s Athe ns, Gre ec e


0.00.0

400.0

400.0

800.0

800.0

1200.0

1200.0

1600.0

1600.0

kWh

000.0

Heating Cooling

MONTHLY HEATING/ COOLING LOADS - All Visible The rma lZone s Athe ns, Gree ce


0.00.0

400.0

400.0

800.0

800.0

1200.0

1200.0

1600.0

1600.0

kWh

000.0

Heating Cooling

MONTHLY HEATING/ COOLING LOADS - All Vis ible The rma l Zones Athe ns, Gree ce


0.00.0

400.0

400.0

800.0

800.0

1200.0

1200.0

1600.0

1600.0

kWh

000.0

Heating Cooling

MONTHLY HEATING/ COOLING LOADS - All Visible The rma lZone s Athe ns, Gree ce

Software


19/23


0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

10 20 30

LIFE-CYCLE

ENERGY

[KWh]

Typical contemporary residence Bioclimatic built

Plint h co ns truc tio n Nat ural s to n e c ons tru ctio n


20/23

Aristophanes

Until well found the precision balance of criteria, it is useless tospeak about objective approach

Available evaluation methods

Willingness to pay (WTP)

Hed onic Property Method

Multi-c riteria dec ision analysis


21/23

Evaluation

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

10

20

30

LIFE-CYCLE

ENERGY

[KWh]

Typical contemporaryresidence Bioclimatic built

Pli nt h cons t ru ct ion N at ura l s ton e cons t ru c tion

0 20 40 60 80 100

model 1

model 2

model 3

model 4

RECYCLING ASPECTS OF MODELS 1, 2

5%

95%



55%

45%



35%

65%


0

20

40

60

80

100

model 1 model 2 model 3 model 4

RAW MATERIALS USED MATERIALS

!!! !!! --- !-

Multicriterion tableau for

dec iding the op timum

construction


22/23

CONCLUSIONS


23/23

CONCLUSIONS

Energy loss

Waste

Toxicity

Energy

Raw materialBUILT

ENVIRONMENT

Studying the construction with this

method we can reduce the mainenvironmental problems of construction

EVALUATION METHODREGARDING THE EFFECT OFBUILDING DESIGN IN THECONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT

UsefulEasy

INDICATOR Evaluates withparameters of

sustainability thetechnical solutions

INPUT OUTPUT

evaluation method regarding the effectof building design in the context ofsustainable development

Documents