evaluation of corrosion products and methods of

47
Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of Characterization September 15, 2015 RJ Lee Group, Inc. Keith Wagner

Upload: others

Post on 15-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of Characterization

September 15, 2015

RJ Lee Group, Inc.

Keith Wagner

Page 2: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Who is RJ Lee Group

• 30+ years in business

• Multiple locations

– Monroeville, PA – Headquarters

– Pasco, WA

– Oakridge, TN

• 200+ professionals with backgrounds in various disciplines

2 Privileged and Confidential RJ Lee Group

• Biology

• Chemical Engineering

• Chemistry

• Civil Engineering

• Computer Science

• Electrical Engineering

• Environmental Sciences

• Geology

• Industrial Hygiene

• Materials Science

• Mathematics

• Mechanical Engineering

• Metallurgy

• Mineral Processing

• Mineralogy

• Physics

Page 3: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

• Materials Characterization

• Failure Analysis

• Forensic Engineering & Investigation

• Durability Modeling

• Environmental Assessment

• Risk Assessment

• Process Troubleshooting

• Field Sampling

• Site Inspections

• Quality Assurance / Quality Control

• Expert Testimony

• Data Management

RJ Lee Group - Areas of Experience

3 Materials Challenges in Maintaining Aging Infrastructure - Concrete RJ Lee Group

Page 4: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

4 Privileged and Confidential RJ Lee Group

• Microscopy

– Optical Microscopes

– Scanning electron microscopes

– Transmission electron microscopes

– High resolution electron microscopes

– Computer-controlled microscopy

• Surface Analysis: ESCA/XPS

• X-ray Diffraction

• X-ray Fluorescence

• Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

• Raman Imaging & Spectroscopy

• Analytical Chemistry

– ICP-ES and ICP-MS

– AA and IC

– GC-MS, GC-FID, GC-ECD

– DSC / TGA

Analytical Instrumentation 1st Mira delivered to EPA

Page 5: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Hitachi S-5500 SEM/STEM

Hitachi HD-2300 STEM

Thermo K-Alpha XPS

0.00E+00

1.00E+05

2.00E+05

3.00E+05

4.00E+05

5.00E+05

6.00E+05

7.00E+05

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300

Co

un

ts /

s

Binding Energy (eV)

O1

s

Si2

pC1

s

N1

s

Na

1s

Mg1s Zn

2p

Ca

2p

B1

sC

l2p

K2

p

Al2

p

Fe

2p

0.00E+00

1.00E+05

2.00E+05

3.00E+05

4.00E+05

5.00E+05

6.00E+05

7.00E+05

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300

Co

un

ts /

s

Binding Energy (eV)

O1

s

Si2

pC1

s

N1

s

Na

1s

Mg1s Zn

2p

Ca

2p

B1

sC

l2p

K2

p

Al2

p

Fe

2p

Internal Development and Instrumentation

RJ Lee Group Privileged and Confidential 5

Internal Development and Cutting Edge Technology

Innovative, Comprehensive Solutions for Clients

RJLG utilizes innovative technology for unprecedented

materials characterization abilities.

Page 6: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Example Area of Investigation

6 Privileged and Confidential RJ Lee Group

Events of September 11, 2001

Kuwati Oil Fires

1994 Northridge Earthquake

Disaster Assessment

Page 7: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Corrosion Process Examples multiple causes and manifestations

1. General/Uniform corrosion

2. Galvanic and stray current corrosion

3. Intergranular and stress corrosion cracking

4. Crevice and Pitting corrosion

5. Microbiologically-Influenced Corrosion (MIC)

6. Environmentally assisted cracking

7. Corrosion fatigue

8. Fretting wear/oxidation

9. Particulate induced erosion corrosion or impingement attack

7 RJLee Group

Page 8: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Some Analytical Technique Capabilities

8 RJLee Group

• Microscopy

– Optical Microscope – morphology and optical properties (mineral/compound ID)

– SEM/EDS – morphology, elemental composition

– TEM/STEM – morphology, internal/crystal structure, elemental composition

– High resolution electron microscopes – nano-size features, structure and composition

– Computer-controlled microscopy – morphology, size distribution of features

• Surface Analysis

– ESCA/XPS – quantitative surface elemental chemistry, oxidation state determination (compound ID), depth profiles, some mapping capability

– Auger Spectroscopy – quantitative surface elemental chemistry, depth profiles, mapping capabilities

– Secondary ion mass Spec. (SIMS) – quantitative surface chemistry,, depth profile, mapping, detection limit in ppm range depending on matrix and element of interest

• Bulk Composition

– X-ray Diffraction – quantitative crystalline compound ID, phase ID

– X-ray Fluorescence – quantitative elemental ID, oxide conversion/equivalent

Page 9: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Some Analytical Technique Capabilities

• Organic Compound Analysis

– Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) – bonding ID, organics, surfactants, silicones

– Raman Imaging & Spectroscopy – bonding ID, organics, surfactants, oxides, carbon, silicones

– GC-MS, GC-FID, GC-ECD – quantitative organic and compound ID

• Analytical Chemistry

– Inductively Coupled Plasma, ICP-ES and ICP-MS – quantitative elemental composition down to trace levels

– Atomic Absorption (AA) - quantitative elemental composition down to trace levels

– Ion Chromatography (IC) – quantitative anion and cation ID

• Thermal Analysis

– Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) – thermal properties, phase changes, thermal durability/life expectancy

– Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) – mass change vs. temperature, thermal deterioration point, volatile compound quantitation

9 RJLee Group

Page 10: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Corrosion can be unpleasant or beautiful

10 RJLee Group

Regardless, corrosion is usually costly

Page 11: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Virtually all materials will corrode (or environmentally/chemically deteriorate)

under the right conditions

11 RJLee Group

Page 12: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Concrete Degradation Mechanisms Reinforcing Corrosion

12 RJLee Group

• Reinforcing steel in concrete vital to performance

– Maintains compressive stress fields

– Prevents easy opening of cracks that initiate

– Stress transfer by bond of cement and wire surface

• Loss of bond leads to failure

– Loss of compressive loads leads to tensile failure

– Volume expansion of wire on de-tensioning can cause cracks

• Loss of bond has multiple causes

– Corrosion • Expansive component

• Ongoing, difficult to arrest, impossible to reverse

– Poor steel condition • Improper manufacturer

• Improper coating

– Poor paste properties and deterioration

Page 13: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Environmental/Materials Selection Corrosion

13 RJLee Group

The selection and combination of

materials can lead to unforeseen

problems

Page 14: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

14 RJLee Group

Environmental corrosion in Electronics

Anodic dissolution can occur in the presence of moisture and bias during

operation of the device.

Page 15: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Environmentally Assisted Cracking, Polymers

15 RJLee Group

Polymers also susceptible to

environmental “corrosion”

Page 16: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

FTIR Spectrum showing indications of oxidation/corrosion of polymer compound

16 RJLee Group

Page 17: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Fire Suppression Pipe Leak

17 RJLee Group

Page 18: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Cross Section through ID Surface Pit

18 RJLee Group

Page 19: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Cross Section through ID Surface Pit

19 RJLee Group

Very little chloride detected in

surface corrosion product

Page 20: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Cross Section through ID Surface Pit

20 RJLee Group

Detection of chlorides near corrosion front

Page 21: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

21 RJLee Group

Selected Drill Pipe Investigations

• Issues with extruded pipe surface quality

– Extrusion surface defects smears and laps

– hindered coating quality, adhesion and corrosion resistance

• Abrasion studies on coated aluminum pipe

– Wear studies addressing service life loss

– Surface scoring and tool mark evaluations

• Corrosion studies on steel drill pipe

– Corrosive wall cross-section loss

– Led to downgrading and limited service life

• Failure analysis of fractured steel drill pipe

– Pipe failed due to crack development

– Failure caused by tool plunge mark

Page 22: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

22 RJLee Group

Drill Pipe Extrusions

Bad Surface Good Surface

Page 23: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

23 RJLee Group

Good Extruded surface

Page 24: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

24 RJLee Group

Bad Extruded Surface

Page 25: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Cross Section of Bad Extruded Surface

25 RJLee Group

Page 26: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Characterization of Thermally Applied Coating Materials

26 RJLee Group

Page 27: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

27 RJLee Group

Bad Extruded Surface Underneath Flake/Lap (Note bright spots are Sn-rich)

Page 28: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

28 RJLee Group

Raman Spectrum collected from carbonaceous material under Flake/Lap

Raman shift (cm-¹)

500 1 000 1 500 2 000

10236617 black spots on Al_2

Oxide or sulfide Amorphous carbon

Page 29: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Abrasion Studies on Coated Pipe

29 RJLee Group

Slipper/Jaw Marks

Drag Marks

Page 30: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Slipper/Jaw Marks and Cross Sectional Depth Measurements

30 RJLee Group

Page 31: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Drag Marks on Surface and Cross Sectional Depth Measurements

31 RJLee Group

Page 32: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Drill Pipe Failed During Pressure Testing

32 RJLee Group

Page 33: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Fracture Origin at Tool Plunge Mark

33 RJLee Group

Page 34: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Fracture Surface of Crack Origin

34 RJLee Group

Depth of Surface crack

Depth of Tool Mark

Page 35: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Pipes Prematurely Retired Due to Cross Sectional Material Loss

35 RJLee Group

Issue thought to be corrosion/erosion on ID surface

Page 36: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Retired Pipe Corroded on OD ID was Polymer Coated

36 RJLee Group

Page 37: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Corrosion Products on OD Surface of Pipe

37 RJLee Group

BSE image of OD corrosion products

EDS spectrum indicates

chloride corrosion

Page 38: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Sample Corrosion Projects

38 RJLee Group

• Buried gas line Failure • Presumed to be caused by corrosion

• Failed Water Hose

• Failed Valve in closed loop cooling system

Page 39: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

39 RJLee Group

• Protective coating missing at fracture location

• Incomplete fracture

• No indication of necking

• Fracture ductility only evident at top of pipe at ligament

NTSB Investigation Photo Pipeline Accident Brief

Number DCA-08-FP-006, March 5, 2008

NTSB Investigation Photo Pipeline Accident Brief

Number DCA-08-FP-006, March 5, 2008

Buried Gas Pipe Failure

Page 40: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

40 RJLee Group

Buried Gas Pipe Failure

• Corrosion pit on bottom surface near origin in flattened dent area

• Pit depth only ~20% of wall thickness

• Pipe fracture surface exhibits brittle transgranular cleavage

• Pipe material is 70 HRB

• Nearest weld is approximately 2 feet away

NTSB Investigation Photo Pipeline Accident Brief

Number DCA-08-FP-006, March 5, 2008

NTSB Investigation Photo Pipeline Accident Brief

Number DCA-08-FP-006, March 5, 2008

Page 41: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

41 RJLee Group

Was Corrosion the Root Cause of Failure?

• Small corrosion pit did not breach pipe wall

– No evidence that a leak could have come from this area

• Fracture mechanics determined that corrosion pit too small to affect fracture characteristics

– Pipe manufactured from API 5L Grade B steel – 70 HRB

– Material properties indicate fracture should have been ductile

– Current material properties indicate ductile character by the deformation of the ligament at the top of the pipe

• Brittle pipe failure mode did not match material condition – Pipe buried too deep for temperature to affect fracture characteristics

– Hydrogen embrittlement would exhibit intergranular fracture mode

– High strain rate only viable explanation of brittle character of fracture

Page 42: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Water Hose Fitting Failure

42 RJLee Group

Brass colored area

Copper colored area

Secondary crack

Page 43: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Water Hose Fitting Failure

43 RJLee Group

Shows intergranular fracture exhibiting

evidence of corrosive attack.

Page 44: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Water Hose Fitting Failure

44 RJLee Group

Shows brass colored area,

intergranular fracture in base metal

exhibiting little indication of de-

zincification.

Page 45: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Water Hose Fitting Failure

45 RJLee Group

Spectrum collected from copper

colored, area, indicates low zinc

content consistent with de-

zincification.

Page 46: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Valve Failure in Closed Loop Cooling System

46 RJLee Group

Page 47: Evaluation of Corrosion Products and Methods of

Valve Failure in Closed Loop Cooling System

47 RJLee Group

Pitting due to corrosive attack in

well maintained system, stray

current driven failure