evaluation of maternal smoking surveillance systems in massachusetts

47
1 Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts Lizzie Harvey, MPH CDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellow Massachusetts Department of Public Health June 14, 2011

Upload: ocean

Post on 14-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts. Lizzie Harvey, MPH CDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellow Massachusetts Department of Public Health June 14, 2011. Disclosure. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

1

Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance

Systems in Massachusetts

Lizzie Harvey, MPHCDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellow

Massachusetts Department of Public HealthJune 14, 2011

Page 2: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

Disclosure

• No significant financial interest or other relationships with the manufacturer(s) ofany commercial product(s) or provider(s) of any commercial services discussed in this presentation and with any commercial supports of the activity

• Massachusetts Department of Public Health RaDAR and PRAMS clearance

2

Page 3: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

3

Objective

• To evaluate maternal smoking surveillance through the Massachusetts Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)

Page 4: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

4

Importance of Maternal Smoking Surveillance

• Maternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with babies who are:– 1.4-3.0 times more likely to die of Sudden

Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)– at 30% higher odds of premature delivery– 2.3 times more likely to deliver term low birth

weight infants

Page 5: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

5

Maternal Smoking Relevance in US and Massachusetts

• Healthy People 2020 Objective– Increase smoking cessation during pregnancy

• CDC Winnable battle• National Performance Measure

– Smoking in the last trimester

• MA Priorities– Improve the health and well being of women in their childbearing

years– Support reproductive and sexual health by improving access to

education and services

• Opportunity for Intervention in MA– Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program

Page 6: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

6

Existing Surveillance System:Massachusetts Birth

Certificate (BC)

Page 7: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

7

MA Birth Certificate

• Maternal smoking questions since 1986

• Since 1996, two questions:

Page 8: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

8

Maternal Smoking in Massachusetts: Birth Certificate Data

% MA Women Reporting Smoking during Pregnancy on the Birth Certificate

6.97.5

13.1

0

3

6

9

12

15

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

MA PRAMS

initiation

Page 9: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

9

Massachusetts Pregnancy and Risk Assessment Monitoring System

(MA PRAMS) as a Surveillance System

Page 10: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

10

PRAMS Background

Population-based data on maternal attitudes and behaviors, before, during, and shortly after pregnancy

Page 11: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

11

MA PRAMS Background

• Initiated in 2007

• 80 questions (54 Core, 16 Standard, 10 MA developed)

• 2-6 months post-partum

• Administered in English and Spanish only

Page 12: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

12

MA PRAMS

Screener

Last 3 months

of pregnancy

3 months

before pregnancy

Current use

Page 13: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

13

Maternal Smoking Data Comparison

3 mo.

Pregnancy Post-partumPre-Pregnancy

PRAMS

3.8 mo.

BC

Conception12 mo. Delivery

Page 14: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

14

Methods

• Data Sources:– 2007-2008 MA PRAMS (N=2,997)– Linked to 2007-2008 MA BC data (N=2,997)

• Analysis:– Frequencies, prevalence estimates, sensitivity,

positive predictive value, kappa coefficients, chi square

– SAS 9.2 and SUDAAN 10.0

• Reference:– CDC: Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public

Health Surveillance Systems (2001)

Page 15: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

15

CDC: System Attributes

• Simplicity• Flexibility • Data Quality• Acceptability• Sensitivity• Positive Value Predictive• Representativeness• Timeliness • Stability

Page 16: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

16

Simplicity

MA BC• Entire population (~75,000 births/year) • DPH Parent

Worksheet with 2 smoking questions

• 49 licensed birth hospitals in MA

MA PRAMS• Population-based

mixed-methodology survey

(~1,500/year)• 4 questions on 80

question survey• Mail survey to

stratified sample of birth population

Page 17: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

17

Flexibility

MA BC• Iterations of maternal

smoking surveillance– 1986– 1996– 2011

• 2011 implementation of electronic 2003 standard birth certificate

MA PRAMS • Maternal smoking

questions Core• Compare to other states• Opportunity to select

standard and state-specific questions

• Other measures related to smoking knowledge and behaviors

Page 18: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

18

Data Quality

Maternal Smoking Surveillance Data Quality: Missing Fields, 2007-08

0.25 0.24 0.30 0.30

2.70 2.60

2.10 2.10

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

Cig UsePrior

Cig UseDuring

Cig UsePrior

Cig UseDuring

Screener 3 MonthsPrior

Last 3Months

Now

BC Pre Merge BC Post Merge PRAMS

% M

issi

ng

N=156,734 N=2,997 N=2,997

Page 19: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

19

Acceptability

MA BC• Mandatory

participation– General Law (Ch. 111,

s.24B)

• Stigma on maternal smoking

MA PRAMS• Not required by law

– Can refuse survey and refuse individual questions

• Infant outcome at 4 months post-partum may determine how mother will respond

Page 20: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

20

Sensitivity Analysis

113 79

20 2714

MA PRAMS

S

NS

192

2734

133 2793 2926

Sensitivity: 113/ (113 + 20) = 0.850

Smoking DURING Pregnancy

MA PRAMS captured 85% of all maternal smoking

during pregnancy identified by the BC

MA BC

S NS

Page 21: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

21

Predictive Value Positive (PVP)

113 79

20 2714

192

2734

133 2793 2926

PVP: 113/ (113 + 79) = 0.589

Smoking DURING Pregnancy

58.9% of all maternal smoking during pregnancy identified by MA PRAMS were cases identified by the birth certificate

MA PRAMS

S

NS

MA BC

S NS

Page 22: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

22

But wait…the BC is not a gold standard! True maternal smoking rate unknown

Kappa Coefficients measure agreement between categorical items taking chance into account

Value of KStrength of

agreement

< 0.20 Poor

0.21 - 0.40 Fair

0.41 - 0.60 Moderate

0.61 - 0.80 Good

0.81 - 1.00 Very good

Page 23: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

23

Kappa Coefficient Analysis

20 79113

Maternal Smoking

DURING Pregnancy

N=2,997

BC PRAMS

Κ = 0.68 (95% CI = 0.62 – 0.74)

Good Agreement

Page 24: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

24

Kappa Coefficient Analysis

2497 98 32 27 --

32 70 14 5 0

-- 10 58 34 0

-- -- 9 11 0

0 0 0 -- 0

Non smoker

Quitter

# cigs dec.

# cigs sa/inc.

NS resumed

Non Quitter # cigs # cigs NS

Smoker dec. sa/inc. resumed

--: 1-4 values suppressed

MA BC

MA PRAMS

Κ = 0.53

95% CI:

0.49 – 0.57

Moderate

Agreement

Page 25: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

25

Representativeness

% MA Women Smoking during Pregnancy

Combined, 10.2

BC, 6.9

PRAMS, 9.3

0

3

6

9

12

15

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Year

Page 26: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

26

Representativeness: Maternal Smoking by Data Source

14

7.2

17.6

9.3

12.6

18.8

10.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

Smoked Before Pregnancy

Smoked During Pregnancy

Smoked Post-Pregnancy

% o

f Mot

hers

BC

PRAMS

Combined

↑34%

↑42%

Page 27: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

27

Representativeness: Differences in Reporting

20 79113

Maternal Smoking

DURING Pregnancy

BC PRAMS

Who is reporting on PRAMS but not on BC?

Page 28: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

28

Demographic Characteristics of those who report maternal smoking during pregnancy

on PRAMS (N=192)Characteristic % PRAMS only % PRAMS and BC Chi-square p-value

White Race (vs. non white)

63.3 65.5 0.75

Black Race (vs. non black)

21.5 19.5 0.72

≥HS grad 73.4 77.0 0.57

≥College 32.9 40.7 0.27

≥ 30 years 26.6 29.2 0.69

Hispanic Ethnicity 35.4 17.7 0.005

Spanish Language 13.9 1.8 0.002

Married 24.1 23.9 0.98

Had Pre-pregnancy insurance

49.4 46.9 0.74

WIC 77.9 69.6 0.21

LBW 7.6 14.2 0.16

Page 29: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

29

Representativeness

MA BC• Population data• Stigma of maternal

smoking• Self-report• Recall bias

MA PRAMS• Stratified sampling by

race/ethnicity– 30% non response

• English and Spanish only• Stigma of maternal

smoking potentially decreased

• Self-report• Recall bias

Page 30: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

30

Limiting

Step

TimelinessMA BC MA PRAMS

DPH Parent Worksheetcompleted

49 Registrars Data Entry

Registry of Vital Records and Statistics

MDPH Birth Report

PRAMS Survey completed

Data Entry

Birth File Closed

Data weighted by CDC

PRAMS ReportPublic Health Action!

Limiting

Step

Public Health Action!

Page 31: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

31

Stability

MA BC• Required by law• 2003 Revised Birth

Certificate Implementation 2011

• Investment in Vital Information Partnership System (VIP) 2011

• MassCHIP

MA PRAMS• 5 year funding

approved 2011-2016– Decreased funding

than previous cycle

• PRAMS website• PONDER (MA

specific) and CPONDER

Page 32: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

32

Conclusions: MA PRAMS System Attributes

Simplicity: 4 questions

Flexibility: Ability to add state specific questions

Data Quality: Low % missing; survey data

Acceptability: Overall stigma potentially decreased

Sensitivity: Increased case

Positive Predictive Value: ascertainment

Representativeness: Higher ascertainment of maternal smoking; Additional measure of post-partum smoking

Timeliness: No real time data; 2 year lag

Stability: 5 year competitive funding from CDC (2011-16)

Kappa statistic

Page 33: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

33

Recommendations• Use PRAMS as a valuable data source in addition to BC to understand burden of maternal smoking

• Use PRAMS to fill the data gap regarding maternal smoking in post-partum period

• Use other PRAMS data to inform actionable interventions in maternal smoking

Prenatal patient education

Postpartum smoking environment

Page 34: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

34

Next Steps

• Add 2009 MA PRAMS data to analysis• Assess impact of new BC data on maternal

smoking• Continue work with the Tobacco Cessation

and Prevention Program– Identify women who are not reporting on the birth

certificate but reporting in PRAMS– Reach out to prenatal providers for universal

screening of maternal smoking behaviors and referrals to cessation programs

Page 35: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

35

AcknowledgementsHafsatou Diop, MDPH Office of Data Translation

Karin Downs, MDPH Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition

Thomas Land, MDPH Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program

Emily Lu, MDPH PRAMS Coordinator

Alice Mroszczyk, MDPH Privacy and Data Access Office

Maria Vu, MDPH Registry of Vital Records and Statistics

CDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program

Page 36: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

36

References/ResourcesCDC Tobacco Use and Pregnancy: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/TobaccoUsePregnancy/index.htm

(Accessed 6/2011)CDC Winnable Battle: Tobacco:

http://www.cdc.gov/WinnableBattles/Tobacco/index.html (Accessed 6/2011)CDC PRAMS:

http://www.cdc.gov/prams/ (Accessed 6/2011)CPONDER:

http://www.cdc.gov/prams/CPONDER.htm (Accessed 6/2011)MA PRAMS:

http://www.mass.gov/dph/prams (Accessed 6/2011)MassCHIP:

http://www.mass.gov/dph/masschip (Accessed 6/2011)MA General Laws regarding birth information collection:

http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXVI/Chapter111/Section24B (Accessed (6/2011)

2003 Revised Birth Certificate: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf (Accessed 6/2011)

CDC Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm (Accessed 6/2011)

Kappa Statistics: Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213.

Dietz, PM, et al. Infant Morbidity and Mortality Attributable to Prenatal Smoking in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2010;39(1) 45-52.

Page 37: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

37

Questions?

Contact Information:

Lizzie Harvey, MPH

CDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellow

Massachusetts Department of Public Health

[email protected]

(617) 624-5559

Page 38: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

38

Extra Slides

Page 39: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

39

Resources in MA

• Massachusetts Smokers’ Helpline

• QuitWorks

Page 40: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

40

Additional PRAMS Questions on Maternal Smoking

New 2009 Core:Which of the following statements best describes the rules about smoking inside your home now? Check one answerNo one is allowed to smoke anywhere inside my homeSmoking is allowed in some rooms or at some timesSmoking is permitted anywhere inside my home

Page 41: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

41

2003 Standard BC

Page 42: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

42

Impact of 2003 BC

3 mo.

Pregnancy Post-partumPre-Pregnancy

PRAMS

3.8 mo.

BC

Conception12 mo. Delivery

Page 43: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

43

Demographic Characteristics of those who report maternal smoking before pregnancy

on PRAMS (N=372)Characteristic % PRAMS only % PRAMS and BC Chi-square p-value

White Race (vs. non white)

58.9 65.4 0.20

Black Race (vs. non black)

22.8 15.9 0.09

≥HS grad 79.1 81.3 0.60

≥College 42.4 45.3 0.57

≥ 30 years 26.6 29.2 0.69

Hispanic Ethnicity 29.8 17.8 0.007

Spanish Language 9.5 1.87 <0.001

Married 32.9 28.5 0.36

Had Pre-pregnancy insurance

59.4 54.9 0.38

WIC 63.2 63.4 0.98

LBW 8.9 9.4 0.87

Page 44: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

44

Sensitivity Analysis

214 158

40 2499

MA PRAMS

S

NS

MA BC

S NS

372

2539

254 2657 2911

Sensitivity: 214 / (214 + 40) = 0.842

113 79

20 2714

MA PRAMS

S

NS

192

2734

133 2793 2926

Sensitivity: 113/ (113 + 20) = 0.850

Smoking BEFORE Pregnancy Smoking DURING Pregnancy

MA PRAMS captured 84.2% of all maternal smoking prior to pregnancy and

85% of all maternal smoking during pregnancy identified by the BC

MA BC

S NS

Page 45: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

45

Predictive Value Positive

214 158

40 2499

372

2539

254 2657 2911

PVP: 214 / (214 + 158) = 0.575

113 79

20 2714

192

2734

133 2793 2926

PVP: 113/ (113 + 79) = 0.589

Smoking BEFORE Pregnancy Smoking DURING Pregnancy

57.5% of all maternal smoking prior to pregnancy and 58.9% of all maternal smoking during pregnancy identified by MA PRAMS were cases identified by the birth certificate

MA PRAMS

S

NS

MA PRAMS

S

NS

MA BC

S NS

MA BC

S NS

Page 46: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

46

Kappa Coefficient Analysis

40 158214

Maternal Smoking

PRIOR to Pregnancy

N=2,997

BC PRAMS

20 79113

Maternal Smoking

DURING Pregnancy

N=2,997

BC PRAMS

Κ = 0.64 (95% CI = 0.60 – 0.69)

Good Agreement

Κ = 0.68 (95% CI = 0.62 – 0.74)

Good Agreement

Page 47: Evaluation of Maternal Smoking Surveillance Systems in Massachusetts

47

Representativeness: Differences in Reporting

40 158214

Maternal Smoking

PRIOR to Pregnancy

BC PRAMS

20 79113

Maternal Smoking

DURING Pregnancy

BC PRAMS

Who is reporting on PRAMS but not on BC?