evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to...

27
Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves Mentor: Julie Gard BS, DVM, PhD, DACT and Dr. Ray Wilhite Merial Summer Scholar: Amy Sanders

Upload: tyshawn-hankinson

Post on 15-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Mentor: Julie Gard BS, DVM, PhD, DACT and Dr. Ray WilhiteMerial Summer Scholar: Amy Sanders

Page 2: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Lameness• One of the two most costly diseases of the dairy industry (1).

• Prevalence in dairy herds is 20-50% of animals depending on age.

• Establishment of husbandry systems to rear replacement heifers that are adept to withstand the rigors of the industry are badly needed.

• What kind of changes can be made that can be utilized by today’s dairy farmers that will reduce the prevalence of lameness ?

Page 3: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Focus

• Investigate a simple modification to the “industry standard” for replacement heifer husbandry that may help:• Decrease cull rates of dairy cows• Increase the size of the digital cushion• Prevent lameness• Increase reproduction and milk production

Page 4: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Hypothesis

• Heifer claws will remodel in response to environmental conditions/stressors

• Specifically, the digital cushions will become larger in response to the stimulation of increased exercise and housing on variable terrain

• Life-long impact on animal health, welfare & productivity by decreasing the likelihood of lameness that is frequently seen during adulthood.

Page 5: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Preliminary Data – Study I• Performed with eight bull calves • Control group reared in accordance with industry standard practices• Treated group were allowed free access to a half mile long lane

where they walked for a total of at least two miles a day on rocky terrain for 4 months time.

• CT with 3-D analysis of P2 and P3 of the right rear foot from each calve was performed with Mimics® medical image processing software.

• Statistical analysis by ANOVA showed that the surface areas of the bones of the digit were significantly (P 0.05) larger in the treated calves vs. the control calves.

• This data indicates that bovine feet undergo structural adaptation in response to mechanical usage.

Page 6: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Preliminary Data – Study II• Performed with 20 bull calves • Control group (n=10) reared in accordance with industry standard

practices• Treated group (n=10) were allowed free access to a half mile long

lane where they walked for a total of at least two miles a day on variable terrain (grass, rocks, & dirt) for 4 months time.

• MRI & 3-D analysis of the digital cushion of the right front and rear feet from each calve was performed with Mimics® medical image processing software.

• It was found that the treated group had a positive percent difference in the volume and the surface area of the digital cushion, 37.10% and 18.25%, respectively, in comparison to the control group, when corrected for weight.

• This data also indicates that bovine feet undergo structural adaptation in response to mechanical usage.

Page 7: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Significance/Literature Support• Lameness has been described as one of the two most costly

diseases in the dairy industry due to the significant negative effects on the well-being and economic productivity of beef and dairy cattle [1]

• “...lameness is the most significant challenge for the dairy industry to overcome given obvious disruption of animal welfare and severe economic losses” [2,3,4]

• Problems with lameness have the potential to lead to other production problems such as decreased milk production, reproduction, & mastitis

• Cows detected with clinical lameness in the first 70 days in milk were 25% less likely to become pregnant compared to non-lame cows [3].

Page 8: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Significance

• Lameness can result in earlier culling (removal from the herd by selling) of animals as well as lower carcass weight, conformation class, and fat cover class and hence a lower carcass economic value.

• Each episode of lameness is reported to cost between $302 and $446 with cost increasing with the severity of the lameness [5,6]

Page 9: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Protection from the Digital Cushion• Housing has been shown to make a

significant impact on the strength/laxity, laminar morphology, connective tissue, and biochemistry of the sole [9].

• The digital cushion functions as a shock absorber and is protective to the structures underneath [2, 7].

• Decreases in the thickness of the digital cushion in cattle are related to contusions with the claw horn capsule and such contusions are a consequence of the lesser capacity of the digital cushion to dampen the pressure exerted by the third phalanx on the soft tissue beneath [2, 8].

Page 10: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Importance of the Digital Cushion• In a study by Bicalho, the prevalence of sole ulcers and white

line disease was significantly associated with the thickness of the digital cushion; with cows in the upper quartile of digital cushion thickness had an adjusted prevalence of lameness 15 percentage points lower than the lower quartile [2].

Digital Cushion: - 3 parts – middle, abaxial & axialRaber et al., 2004

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023303000534

Page 11: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Measurement of the Digital Cushion• The use of ultrasonography to measure the digital cushion was

based off of Bicalho’s study in which the thickness of the digital cushion was measured ultrasonographically from the junction of the heel and sole where a typical sole ulcer is located. [2]

• Also in previous studies, the measurement of the digital cushion was based upon age and lactation status while finding a correlation with the fatty acid content. [10].

• Our proposal is basing the measurements of the deep digital flexor compared to the digital cushion off of the environment that the heifer is raised in after weaning.

Page 12: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Method

• Control Group• 6 months: 299 lbs• 6 months: 339 lbs• 5 months: 374 lbs• 8 months: 452 lbs• 8 months: 558 lbs• 9 months: 604 lbs• 8 months: 608 lbs

• Treated Group• 7 months: 344 lbs• 6 months: 348 lbs• 6 months: 354 lbs• 8 months: 421 lbs• 8 months: 458 lbs• 9 months: 458 lbs• 9 months: 518 lbs

• 14 Holstein heifers with random assignment of seven in each group

Page 13: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Experimental Design• All calves were reared in accordance with the current accepted practices of

the dairy industry. • At the randomized ages from 6-9 months• Control group was raised according to industry standards of the dairy husbandry

at E.V. Smith Extension Unit • Treated group was maintained on a half mile long lane containing variable terrain

at the North Auburn Beef Experiment Station. • Pedometers were placed on each group for the length of one week to determine

steps/miles walked.

Page 14: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Treated Group• Encouraged to walk at least two miles per day by placement of

food and water on opposite ends of the lane. • Goal study period is 13-18 months depending on the age of

the heifers on day zero of study.

Page 15: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Variable Terrain

Page 16: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Method• Calipers were used to measure the

width and length of the medial and lateral claws of the left fore, & left rear legs of both groups

• The digital cushions and deep digital flexor tendons of both groups were measured by ultrasound examination using a 6 MHz transducer at monthly intervals.

• The Calf Number, Age, Body Condition Score, and Weight were all recorded as well along with the data.

Page 17: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Placement of ultrasound probe was the heal bulb at the level of the coronary band.

The heel bulb was cleaned with alcohol prior to ultrasound examination

Page 18: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Ultrasound Utilization• The 6 MHz transducer probe was placed on the bulb of the heel of each

claw at the level of the coronary band (Figure 1)• Measurements were recorded of the deep digital flexor and the digital

cushion. (Figure 2) • All calves were examined by ultrasound at day 0 & at monthly intervals.

Page 19: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

DAY ZERO:Control Group

Page 20: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Day Zero: Treatment Group

Page 21: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

DAY 30:Control Group

Page 22: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

DAY 30:Treatment Group

Page 23: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Results • Control

• Treatment

1 2 3 4 5 6 70

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Day ZeroDay 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 70

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

Day ZeroDay 30

Page 24: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Results• Currently, there is only a small difference between control and treated groups which

may be attributed to normal variation among animals and from growth• Additional time is necessary to allow enough time for remodeling of tissues so

recheck at monthly intervals. • The ultrasound method employed seems to be a viable tool for monitoring of the

digital cushion of cattle• There was difference, however, in the health of the feet of the calves. • The control group had cases of epiphysitis, and dermatitis due to wet pasture• We believe the rocky terrain pasture didn’t have problems because it was drier and

the movement of the calves helped keep them from standing in wet areas.

Page 25: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Results of Pedometers• Pedometers clipped onto cow leg straps were placed on four

heifers from each group over a period of one week. • Only one pedometer from each group had results. • Control group= 5.1 miles total= 0.73 miles a day• Treatment group= 13.1 miles total = 1.9 miles per day

Page 26: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

References• [1]Kossaibati MA, and Esslemnont RJ. The cost of production diseases in dairy herds in England.

Vet J 1997;154:41-51.• [2]Bicalho, RC, Machado VS, Caixeta LS. Lameness in Dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a

disease of debilitated cattle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of the digital cushion. J of Dairy Sci. 2009; 92:3175-3184.

• [3]Bicalho RC, Vokey CF, Erb HN, Guard CL. Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: Impact on pregnancy and survival. J Dairy Sci. 2007b; 90:4586-4591.

• [4]Bicalho RC, Warnick LD, Guard CL. Stragtegies to analyze milk losses caused by diseases with potential incidence throughout lactation: A lameness example. J of Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:2653-2661

• [5]Booth CJ, Warnick LD, Grohn YT, Maizon DO, Guard CL. Effects of lameness on culling on dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87:4115-4122

• [6]Guard C. The cost of lameness and the value of hoof care. Proc Hoof Care Conf. 1997; 4(abstract).

• [7]Cha E, Hertl JA, Bar D, Gröhn YT. The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programming. Prev Vet Med. 2010; 97(1):1-8

• [8]Knott L, Tarlton JF, Craft H, Webster AJ. Effects of housing, parturition and diet change on the biochemistry and biomechanics of the support structures of the hoof of diary heifers. Vet J. 2007;174 (2):277-87.

• [9]Räber M, Lischer Ch J, Geyer H, Ossent P. The bovine digital cushion – a descriptive anatomical study. The Vet J. 2004;167:258-264.

• [10]Izci, Celal; Erol, Muharrem; Goksahin, Ebru. A Study AboutDetermining the Changes in the Structural Characteristics of the Digital Cushion in Heifer and Multipar Dairy Cows: A Preliminary Report. March 2011; Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner FakultesiDergisi;2011, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p159

Page 27: Evaluation of the digital cushion and weight-bearing surface of the bovine foot in response to modifications in housing and rearing practices of calves

Special Thanks• Dr. Julie Gard• Dr. Debra Taylor• Dr. Merilee Holland• Leah Guidry• Megan Schnuelle• Will Justus• 4th Year Ambulatory and Therio

Students