evaluation of wrf-sfire performance with field...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFluxexperiment
Mary Ann Jenkins1,4,
Adam K. Kochanski1, Jan Mandel2, Jonathan D. Beezley2, Craig B. Clements3, Steven Krueger1
11Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT2Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO,USA3Department of Meteorology and Climate Science, San José State University, San José, CA4Department of Earth and Space Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
1
accepted for publication by Atmosphericchemistry and physics (ACP)
![Page 2: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WRF-SFIRE’s performance?
Pretty good.
![Page 3: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Examples of impact ofwildfire-atmosphere coupling on
wildfire behavior
3
Two ExamplesImpact of the background wind field
![Page 4: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
An illustration of the importance ofvertical wind shear in the upstream
flowProof of Concept
4
![Page 5: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ByMary Ann Jenkins, York University,
Toronto, Canada(Adjunct UofU)
Adam Kochanski, Steven Krueger,
University of Utah
5
![Page 6: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Clark et al 1996 IJWF. Schematic of SurfaceConditions at Head of Fire
“kinematic” explanation.
But it is completeand correct?
where δ = ∇⋅V is
convergence,
moving apart of
fluid particles.
V is velocity.6
![Page 7: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
kinematicexplanation too simple?
Two counter-rotatingvorticies
produce fire front (solidblack line)
Also simulated& observed
![Page 8: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Idealized (no surface friction) WRF-Sfire simulations of propagatinggrass fire lines in environments
without or with vertical wind shear
all with identical upstream surfacewind speed (5 m/s)
![Page 9: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
TextWRF-Fire
9
tsurface windspeed 5 m/s
![Page 10: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
X po
sitio
n of
the
fire
front
(m)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000
0.5
1
1.5
x 1010
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000
1
2
x 1010
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000
2
x 1010
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000
1
2
x 1010
Time (s)
Tota
l Fire
Hea
t (W
)
CONTROLSHEARLOGTANHdata5
tPropagation of Fire Front
10
![Page 11: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
tTANH
tLOG
tCONTROL
11
tSHEAR
![Page 12: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Z-vorticity, CONST
12
![Page 13: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Z-vorticity, CONST
13
![Page 14: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Z-vorticity,LOG
14
![Page 15: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Z-vorticity,LOG
15
![Page 16: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
where ω = ∇×V is vorticity,
rotation of fluid particles, ∇ is
gradient operator,
V is 3D velocity, and p is
pressure.
p∝−|ω2|
tVVortices and propagation of thefront
tThese low pressures (perturbations) are NOThydrostatic, they are DYNAMICAL
16
![Page 17: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
tLookingdown on
the surfacefire . . .
17
![Page 18: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
tLookingdown onthe LOG
surface fire. . .
18
![Page 19: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Z-vorticity,TANH
19
![Page 20: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Control Run No Background Shear
Z-vorticity,TANH
20
![Page 21: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
tLookingdown on
the TANHsurface fire
. . .
21
![Page 22: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
![Page 23: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Steady state fires exist in constant or shearedbackground wind profiles . . . that are not unstableto perturbations in the background flow.
Non steady-state fires occur in a backgroundwind profiles that are unstable to perturbations(supplied by surface heating, and in this case bythe fire).
Because it contains an inflection point, theTANH background wind profile is known to beunstable to perturbations in the wind field.
•
•
•
23
![Page 24: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
tX-Z crosssection of the LOG
fire . . .
tFirefront/backposition
24
![Page 25: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
tX-Z crosssection of
the TANHfire . . .
25
![Page 26: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Background wind profiles can be inherentlystable or inherently unstable to perturbationsintroduced by surface and plume convection.
Fire front propagation (and plume behavior) isdependent on low pressures associated with thedevelopment of vorticity.
Vorticity and vortices are a natural part of thebasic fluid dynamics of fire convection and willalways be part of the fire perimeter and front.
•
•
•
Discussion
26
![Page 27: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ConclusionsThe background wind field does matter! Based on
this study, fire/atmosphere interactions can be responsible for a lot of severe and/or erratic firebehavior that is observed.
Coupled atmosphere/fire simulators such as WFDSmust be given proper flow boundary conditions.
ABANDON the prescribed simple near-surface log-linear wind profile --- it does not work!
The most promising candidate to supply these BCs(either by one-way coupling or two-way coupling) isWRF and/or WRF-Sfire.
•
•
•
•
27
![Page 28: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Realistic Experiment
WRF-SFIRE validated using Fireflux I•
28
![Page 29: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29E−W distance (m)
N−S dista
nce (m)
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
2800
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
![Page 30: Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field ...forefire.univ-corse.fr/cargese2013/ven/jenkins.pdf · Evaluation of WRF-Sfire Performance with Field Observations from the FireFlux](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071100/5fd92862b69e3b00d2510751/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30