evaluation sms orientation guide

5
Evaluation SMS Orientation Guide Pesce Project Eval This instrument is for anonymous feedback after viewing the SMS Orientation Guide on the Staff-only Teachers Resources page of the Schofield Middle School website. Your thoughts are valuable to me in improving my educational technology skills to the benefit of our school in this endeavor. Please rate the quality of the SMS Orientation Guide below on a scale from 1 to 4 (1 equals Poor and 4 equals Exceptional). Additional comments are welcome. Thank you for your participation! Jean Pesce 1. Usefulness Was the content of the video generally useful? Do you feel the information will help orient new-comers with Schofield? Poor Fair Good Comment 2. Bias-Free Was the video bias-free in all respects? If not please explain who might be offended and why?

Upload: jean-pesce

Post on 01-Oct-2015

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A tool for feed-back evaluation of SMS Orientation Guide implemented at Schofield Middle School.

TRANSCRIPT

Evaluation SMS Orientation GuidePesce Project Eval

This instrument is for anonymous feedback after viewing the SMS Orientation Guide on the Staff-only Teachers Resources page of the Schofield Middle School website. Your thoughts are valuable to me in improving my educational technology skills to the benefit of our school in this endeavor.Please rate the quality of the SMS Orientation Guide below on a scale from 1 to 4 (1 equals Poor and 4 equals Exceptional). Additional comments are welcome.

Thank you for your participation!Jean Pesce1. Usefulness

Was the content of the video generally useful? Do you feel the information will help orient new-comers with Schofield?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment2. Bias-Free

Was the video bias-free in all respects? If not please explain who might be offended and why?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment3. Objectives

Were the objectives clearly stated in the introduction?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment4. . Presentation

Was the amount and complexity of the content appropriate for the audience?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment5. Reflection

Was there time allowed for the viewer to consider the information presented?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment6. . General Aspects

Did the video appear to be planned well for comfortable realistic viewing?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment7. Visual

Were the camera angle and transitions appropriate for engaging the viewer?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment8. Audio

Were the narration vocabulary, speed, and any additional audio appropriate for the intended audience?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment9. Introduction

Were the goals and objectives of the video provided beforehand and then accomplished as stated?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment10. Clarification and Summary

Were additional resources, materials, or activities available to improve the intended learning? Does the summary help the viewer and match the video?PoorFairGoodExceptional

Comment

Thank you for participating in my continued education and to improving the Schofield Middle School work environment.Jean Pesce