evaluation, special cases and pitfalls copyright · displace (pump down) cement with light, clean...
TRANSCRIPT
Primary Cementing Results –Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls
Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
Evaluate cement bond laboratory testing to assess the strengthand extent of cement-to-formation and cement-to-casing bond
Describe the concept of the cement “micro-annulus” effect and howto prevent this problem from occurring
Evaluate case study data for improving primary cement job quality
Identify other cementing problems and challenges such ascementing through gaseous zones and salt formations
Describe cement fluid properties and how those properties affectthe flow of cement; this is referred to as “cement rheology”
Calculate the cement volume required for a casing cementing job
Evaluate a cement bond log (CBL) and make recommendations
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
1
COPYRIGHT
• This thinking is inaccurate
Achieving Isolation
The term “isolation” is often used interchangeably with the term “bond”
Conventional thought in primary cementing is that: what is really needed is good cement “bond”
What is actually needed is good zonal “isolation”
Shear Bond and Hydraulic Bond lab tests evaluate the potential to achieve zonal isolation
Hydraulic Bond Test Cell
Pressure
Mud Cake
Formation Core
Cement Slurry
How good is the cement bond?- to the formation and to the pipeHow good is the cement bond?- to the formation and to the pipe
What are the forces required to break the bond?
What are the forces required to break the bond?
Has mud cake been removed?Has mud cake been removed?
Can gas flow in formation / pipe cemented annulus?
Can gas flow in formation / pipe cemented annulus?
Pressure
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
2_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
Casing
Cement
Pressure:Water or Gas
Hydraulic Bond Test Cell
Formation
Quantitative measurement is made to determine cement bond to the formation and to the pipe
Heating oil is circulated to establish temperature
FiltrateReturnsFluid In
Casing
Halliburton Cement Test Cell
MudCement
H2O
Formation
Cement
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
3
COPYRIGHT
Shear Bond (psi)
Water Bond (psi)
Gas Bond (psi)
2400(16,547.42)
1200(8,273.71)
400+(2,757.9+)
141(972.161)
500-700(3,447.38-4,826.33)
150-250(1,034.21-1,723.69)
123(848.06)
500-700(3,447.38-4,826.33)
150-250(1,034.21-1,723.69)
79(544.69)
200(1,378.95)
10-20(68.95-137.90)
Shear Bond (psi)
Water Bond (psi)
Gas Bond (psi)
Mill Varnish
Sand-Blasted
Rusty
External Pipe Surface Affects Bond
141(972.161)
500-700(3,447.38-4,826.33)
150-250(1,034.21-1,723.69)
123(848.06)
500-700(3,447.38-4,826.33)
150-250(1,034.21-1,723.69)
Resin-Sand Coat
2400(16,547.42)
1200(8,273.71)
400+(2,757.9+)
79(544.69)
200(1,378.95)
10-20(68.95-137.90)
Pipe / Cement Bond and the Micro-Annulus Effect
Avoid pressure on casing during Waiting On Cement (WOC) (if float valves holding pressure)
• If pressure is released, pipe returns to smaller outside diameter• Micro-annulus forms between pipe and cement
Displace (pump down) cement with light, clean salt water
Heat of hydration will: • Increase fluids temperatures, and,• Increase casing pressure
– Could cause casing expansion
Circulation while WOC is helpful
Increased pressure after WOC helpful
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
4_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
• Cement plus additives based upon total volume
Cost of Primary Cementing
Cost of cement slurry
Cost of Pumping Equipment
Cost of Rig Time and Waiting On Cement (WOC)
Cost of Evaluation
Cost of Remedial Operations (initial + future)
Primary Cement Study: Katy Field
25 casing strings cemented
22 Failures (88%)
Causes:• 2 due to lost circulation• 20 due to:
– Excess filter cake
– Lost returns
– Inefficient mud displacement
Cockfield
Wilcox
14-3/4"Hole
9-7/8"Hole
6-3/4"Hole
(0.375 m)
(0.251 m)
(0.171 m)
10-3/4"Csg
7-5/8"Csg
5" Liner
(0.273 m)
(0.127 m)
(0.194 m)
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
5
COPYRIGHT
Depth
6100'
6500'
7000'
7500'
7700'
Gas &WaterZones
SP
Spontaneous Potential (SP) Log of Katy Cockfield Sands
Pressure (psi)600 (4,136.9)
840 (3,923.1)
1600 (5,791.6)
2000 (13,789.5)
700 (4,826.3)
569 (3,923.1)
700 (4,826.3)
530 (3,654.2)
640 (4,412.6)
2500 (17,236.9)
(kPa)
(1,859.3 m)
(1,981.2 m)
(2,133.6 m)
(2,286 m)
(2,346.96 m)
Evaluation of Cement Jobs
9 Wells / 8 Failures / Average 8 squeezes per well
7-5/8"(0.1937 m) Casing Through Cockfield Zone
Well # Squeezes Well # Squeezes
1 0 6 7
2 6 7 9
3 11 8 4
4 8 9 4
5 10
Conclusion: Must improve primary cementing practices
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
6_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
Changes After Study
Improved drilling mud system fluid loss
Casing rotations and reciprocation • Requires power swivel
Added centralizers and scratchers to help mud displacement
Results: • Drilled 13 new wells• Only 2 primary cement job failures
– Each of these 2 failures required 3 squeezes
Bottom Line:• Saved enough money to drill 3 additional wells
Special Cementing Problems
Deep Wells• Depths greater than 15,000' (4,572 m)
• Temperatures greater than 250°F (121°C)
Liners• High temperatures, small hole, no movement
Gas communication
Highly deviated wells
Thermal wells strength retrogression:• For > 230°F (110°C), add 30% to 40% silica flour
Frozen formations:• Use gypsum / cement blend
Multi-Stage Cementing
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
7
COPYRIGHT
Cementing Through Gas Zones
Gas communication between zones and migration to surface is a common problem
First, understand problem and set objectives
Next, correct problem with careful slurry design, pipe movement, additives, proper displacement pressure program, etc.
ChannelGas
Leakage
Gas Zone
Cementing Thru Salt Sections
• Use salt saturated water while drilling
Control hole washouts
Use salt-saturated cement through salt and shale zones
Caliper hole to assure correct cement volumes
Use ample cement to cover zone
Design casing to withstand 1.0 psi/ft (22.621 kPa/m) collapse loads
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
8_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
SaltSection
Casing Failure Patterns
SaltSection
InitialInitial
Tubing
CasingSalt
CollapsedCollapsed
DeformedDeformed
Effect of Salt Zones
Salt zones can create cavities or washouts
If a salt water slurry is used, check salt for pumpability
Salt may act as either an accelerator or retarder
Sal
t W
ater
Slu
rry
Fre
sh W
ater
Slu
rry
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
9
COPYRIGHT
Cement Rheology
Shear stress and shear rate determination Shear stress and shear rate determination Shear stress and shear rate determination
Field measurement of cement slurry properties Field measurement of cement slurry properties Field measurement of cement slurry properties
Shear Rate
She
ar S
tres
s Herschel-Buckley
Rheological Models
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
10_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
Tru-WateBalanceTru-WateBalance
Pressured Mud Balance
Pressurized Mud Scale for Field Measurement of Cement Slurry Density
Pressured Mud Balance
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
11
COPYRIGHT
Radioactive Densometer
Useful Cementing Data
Volume: (hole diameter)2 x 0.97 = Bbls/1000 ft (304.8 m)
Mix Water: ~5 gal (18.9 L) per sack
Volume Conversion:
Hydrostatic Pressure:
• 5.614 ft3 / bbl and 6.29 bbls/m3
• 10 lb / gal = 0.52 psi/ft or 11.76 kPa/m
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
12_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
Not doing the calculations needed and not keeping good records
Relying too much upon chemical additives to solve all cementing problems
Failing to recognize and handle mud gel problems and failure to condition the mud
Using “hole problems” as an excuse not to implement correct, known procedures
Primary Cementing Pitfalls
PIT
FAL
LS
Company thought processes that say: “It’s the Service Company responsibility to provide a good primary cement job”
Compressive Strength versus Bond Index
Bond Index = Attenuation / Attenuation Max
Where:
Attenuation = Attenuation at any point on thelog (db/ft or db/meter)
Attenuation Max = Maximum attenuation(db/ft or db/meter)
Example for this 7" (0.1778 m) casing:Max log reading 3.5 mV eq 8.8 dB/ft (28.9 dB/m)
Min log reading 2 mV eq 10.5 dB/ft (34.4 dB/m)
> B.I. = 84%
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
13
COPYRIGHT
Interval Isolation Evaluation
Graph from experimental work, courtesy Schlumberger
A Bond Index of 0.80 suggests that only about 80% of the annulus is filled with good cement.
Casing size, in
5 6 7 8 9 10
15
10
5
0
ft
9 5/8 "
Cem
ente
d in
terv
al,
ft
FOR 80% CEMENT
Isolation can reasonably be ensured by a Bond Index higher than 0.80 over a minimum cemented interval, the interval length depending on casing size.
(m)
(0.127) (0.152) (0.178) (0.203) (0.229) (0.244) (0.254)
(1.524)
(3.048)
(4.572)
Example Log: CBL / VDL with "Bond Index"
Cement bond log should show > 10 millivolts over an interval of 7 meters to
be interpreted as providing isolation
Cement bond log should show > 10 millivolts over an interval of 7 meters to
be interpreted as providing isolation
Primary Cementing Results - Evaluation, Special Cases and Pitfalls ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
14_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT
Primary Cementing Planning Strategy Summary
and
Work to achieve successful primary cement job execution and results looking at both the drilling and the production operations perspectives
Work to achieve successful primary cement job execution and results looking at both the drilling and the production operations perspectives
Work with the drilling organization and cement services companies to strive to achieve a properly designed primary cement job
Work with the drilling organization and cement services companies to strive to achieve a properly designed primary cement job
Learning Objectives
Evaluate cement bond laboratory testing to assess the strength and extent of cement-to-formation and cement-to-casing bond
Describe the concept of the cement “micro-annulus” effect and how to prevent this problem from occurring
Evaluate case study data for improving primary cement job quality
Identify other cementing problems and challenges such as cementing through gaseous zones and salt formations
Describe cement fluid properties and how those properties affect the flow of cement; this is referred to as “cement rheology”
Calculate the cement volume required for a casing cementing job
Evaluate a cement bond log (CBL) and make recommendations
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Primary and Remedial Cementing Core
© PetroSkills, LLC., 2016. All rights reserved._____________________________________________________________________________________________
15
COPYRIGHT