evaluation standards 6 & 8

38
Evaluation Standards 6 & 8 Cherokee County Schools Administrators July 30, 2012 Joyce Gardner Professional Development Consultant, Region 8 [email protected]

Upload: grover

Post on 23-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation Standards 6 & 8. Cherokee County Schools Administrators July 30, 2012 Joyce Gardner Professional Development Consultant, Region 8 [email protected]. region8wnc.ncdpi.wikispaces.net. A Coherent Plan for Statewide Impact. Principal’s Responsibility. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Cherokee County Schools AdministratorsJuly 30, 2012

Joyce GardnerProfessional Development Consultant,

Region 8 [email protected]

Page 2: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

region8wnc.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

Page 3: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

A Coherent Plan for Statewide Impact

Page 4: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Principal’s Responsibility

Manage

Know

IdentifyEnsure

Supervise

Page 5: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Teacher Evaluation Process

5

STEP 1:Training and Orientation

STEP 2:Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference

STEP 3:Observation Cycle(Administrative and

Peer)

STEP 4: Summary

Evaluation and Goal Setting

See Process Handout

Page 6: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

STANDARD I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.

STANDARD II: Teachers establish a respectful

environment for a diverse population of

students.

STANDARD III: Teachers know the content they teach.

STANDARD IV: Teacher facilitate learning for

their students.STANDARD V: Teachers reflect on their practice.

STANDARD VI: Teachers facilitate academic growth.

6

Page 7: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Sixth Standard for Teachers:

TEACHERS CONTRIBUTE TO THE ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF STUDENTS.

The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable progress for students based on established performance expectations using appropriate data to demonstrate growth.

7

Page 8: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Effective Teachers

8

Student Growth Meets

Expectations

Proficient or Higher on All

StandardsEffective Teacher

Student Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Accomplished or Higher on All

Standards

Highly Effective Teacher

Page 9: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Inclusion of Student Growth:

The State will add a student growth component to the teacher and principal evaluation process.

A Teacher Effectiveness Work Group comprised of representative stakeholders will consider how to add the components and address technical concerns.

9

Page 10: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Importance of Student Growth:

10

Percent of Teachers Rated as Accomplished or Distinguished

Standard Schools that did NOT make expected growth

Schools that did make expected growth

Standard One 67.39 64.06Standard Two 67.21 66.87Standard Three 55.17 60.99Standard Four 63.79 63.93Standard Five 72.00 63.8

Current evaluation ratings are not correlated with student growth.

Page 11: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Proceeding with Caution:

Using the current data for grades 3 – 8 math and English Language Arts teachers, less than five percent are not making expected growth.

Under the current EVAAS system, nearly 80 percent of teachers stay in the same category (not detectably different) each year.

11

Page 12: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Annual Evaluation Policy:

12

Page 13: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Abbreviated Evaluation

• For career teachers not in their renewal year, the second option would require 2 informal observations

• Informal observations do not require a post-observation conference) and

• A summative evaluation at the end of the year.

• An abbreviated evaluation is an OPTION.• Principals always have the right to complete

the full Teacher Evaluation Process.

Page 14: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Concerns about Annual Evaluation:

The new evaluation instrument is more thorough and specific, and, therefore, takes longer for evaluators to complete.

The House and Senate budgets reduced the number of assistant principals.

Principals may not have time to complete the entire evaluation process for all staff members.

14

Page 15: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

15

Annual Abbreviated Evaluation:• Teachers contribute to

the academic success of students.

Standard Six

• Teachers facilitate learning for their studentsStandard

Four

• Teachers demonstrate leadership.Standard

One

Page 16: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

16

Requirements for Abbreviated Evaluation:

The abbreviated evaluation option includes:• Teacher Self-Assessment• Professional Development Plan• Two Informal Observations (at least twenty minutes each)

• Summary Evaluation Conference (on Standards One, Four, and Six)

• Summary Rating Form (on Standards One, Four, and Six)

Page 17: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

NC Educator Evaluation Systemhttp://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

Page 18: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

STEP 1: Principal will log in as normal.

STEP 2: Select Observe/Report: Observations.

STEP 3: Select the teacher of interest.

STEP 4: If creating a new observation, select NEW OBSERVATION.

Page 19: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

STEP 6: Click on the “Next” button

STEP 5: If working on an existing observation that is “In progress” click on the observation:

Page 20: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

STEP 6: If the teacher status is Career, click on the down arrow key in OBSERVATION VERSION then you may either select the Full Version:

Or the Abbreviated Version:

Page 21: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Probationary teachers do not have an option for different versions, therefore, only the Full Version is available:

Page 22: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

ABBREVIATED EVALUATIONSUMMARY RATING FORM

Beth Ann Williams – [email protected]

Page 23: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

STEP 1: Select New Form

STEP 2: Select Next

Page 24: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

STEP 3:

Or the Abbreviated Version:

If the teacher status is Career, click on the down arrow key in OBSERVATION VERSION then you may either select the Full Version

Page 25: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

WRITEABLE PDPRobert Sox – [email protected]

Page 26: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

populates when teachers are rated in the previous year as “not demonstrated” or “developing”

allows for additional items to be added

Page 27: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

BREAKReturn in 10 minutes.

27

Page 28: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8
Page 29: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Gallery Walk with the Standards• With a partner, read each of the elements

and descriptors posted around the room.

• Do one of the following:– Write down a behavior that exemplifies

this element.– Validate what someone else has written.– Add to what someone else has written.

Page 30: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

promotes

EffectiveLeadership

StudentLearning

Quality Teaching

1. Assessing teacher performance2. Designing a professional growth plan

Page 31: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers

Page 32: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

• Consistently and significantly exceeded basic competenceDistinguished

• Exceeded basic competence most of the timeAccomplished

• Demonstrated basic competence Proficient

• Demonstrated adequate growth toward achieving standards, but did not demonstrate basic competence

Developing

Page 33: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

• Consistently and significantly exceeded basic competenceDistinguished

• Exceeded basic competence most of the timeAccomplished

• Demonstrated basic competence Proficient

• Demonstrated adequate growth toward achieving standards, but did not demonstrate basic competence

Developing

Page 35: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

DRAFT

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Evaluation Summary SheetDraft January 2012: Assume SBE Adoption of Option One in TCP-C-006

Name: Martha Washington School: Independence Elementary SchoolLEA: Freedom County Schools Licensure: Career-Status Overall Status: EffectiveStandard One: Teachers demonstrate leadership.

NotDemonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard Two: Teachers establish a respectful environment.NotDemonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard Three: Teachers know the content they teach.NotDemonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard Four: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.NotDemonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard Five: Teachersreflect on their practice.NotDemonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard Six: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.*Only three-year rolling average is used to determine overall status*Year One (2009– 2010) Year Two (2010 – 2011) Year Three (2011 – 2012) Three-Year RollingAverage*

Does not meet

expected growth

Meets expected growth

Exceeds expected growth

Overall Status:

Needs improvement Effective HighlyEffective

Does not meet

expected growth

Meets expected growth

Exceeds expected growth

Does not meet

expected growth

Meets expected growth

Exceeds expected growth

Does not meet

expected growth

Meets expected growth

Exceeds expected growth

Page 36: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Coaching for Success

“People are like dirt. They can either nourish you and help you grow as a person or they can stunt your growth and make you wilt and die.”

~Plato

Page 37: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Resources• How to videos for online tool:• https://www.jcps.k12.nc.us/departments/Hum

anResources/Pages/NCEducatorEvaluation.aspx

• Directions for electronic signatures https://mxweb.media-x.com/home/ncval/help/EES_NC_ElectronicSignature.pdf

• Teacher Effectiveness Coordinator: Jennifer Preston, [email protected]

Page 38: Evaluation Standards 6 & 8

Contact Information

Joyce Gardner

[email protected]