evaluationrwanda_lisbon

Upload: archit-bohra

Post on 08-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    1/18

    NONIE BUDGET SUPPORTNONIE BUDGET SUPPORTEVALUATION WOKRSHOPEVALUATION WOKRSHOP

    Rwandas Experience with EvaluatingRwandas Experience with Evaluating

    Budget SupportBudget SupportPortugal, October 1, 2008Portugal, October 1, 2008

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    2/18

    Overview of the presentationOverview of the presentation

    BackgroundBackground

    Objective of the evaluationObjective of the evaluation

    Key findingsKey findings

    Major gaps in relation to impact evaluationMajor gaps in relation to impact evaluation

    Conclusion: Impact evaluation will be feasible if?Conclusion: Impact evaluation will be feasible if?

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    3/18

    1. Background1. Background

    June 2002, first PRSP approvedJune 2002, first PRSP approved

    2003 partnership agreement signed (5 donors)2003 partnership agreement signed (5 donors)

    20052005 2006, first and only joint budget support2006, first and only joint budget supportevaluation. Annual joint budget support reviewsevaluation. Annual joint budget support reviews

    institutionalizedinstitutionalized

    CaveatCaveat Evaluation findings have beenEvaluation findings have beenovertaken by recent reform effortsovertaken by recent reform efforts focused onfocused onGBS and not other aid modalitiesGBS and not other aid modalities

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    4/18

    2. Purpose of the evaluation2. Purpose of the evaluation

    Evaluate to what extent, under whatEvaluate to what extent, under whatcircumstances is GBS relevant, efficient andcircumstances is GBS relevant, efficient andeffective for achieving sustainableeffective for achieving sustainable impact onimpact on

    poverty reduction and growthpoverty reduction and growth

    Forward looking evaluation (lessons learned,Forward looking evaluation (lessons learned,

    joint donor accountability at country leveljoint donor accountability at country level

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    5/18

    3. Key findings3. Key findings

    Effect of General budget support:Effect of General budget support: RelevanceRelevance Harmonization and alignmentHarmonization and alignment

    Performance of public expenditurePerformance of public expenditure Planning and budgeting systemsPlanning and budgeting systems Policies and processesPolicies and processes Macroeconomic performanceMacroeconomic performance

    Public service deliveryPublic service delivery Poverty reductionPoverty reduction Sustainability of Budget supportSustainability of Budget support

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    6/18

    i. Key findings: Relevancei. Key findings: Relevance

    RelevantRelevant supporting stronger governmentsupporting stronger governmentleadership/ownershipleadership/ownership

    Links to decentralization strengthenedLinks to decentralization strengthened

    Balance between social and growth sectors ofBalance between social and growth sectors of

    the PRSP at issuethe PRSP at issue

    Conditionality not consistent with the paradigmConditionality not consistent with the paradigmof partnershipof partnership no mutual accountabilityno mutual accountability

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    7/18

    iiii..Harmonization and AlignmentHarmonization and Alignment

    Stronger alignment to PRSP and Vision 2020Stronger alignment to PRSP and Vision 2020

    Policy and institutional framework for harmonizationPolicy and institutional framework for harmonization

    strengthenedstrengthened

    Improved aid coordinationImproved aid coordination

    Predictability weaker (greatly improved recently)Predictability weaker (greatly improved recently)

    Potential to improve complementality between differentPotential to improve complementality between differentaid modalitiesaid modalities

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    8/18

    iii. Performance of public expenditureiii. Performance of public expenditure

    Significant additionality of aid due to ease ofSignificant additionality of aid due to ease ofdisbursementdisbursement

    Higher ratio of disbursement to commitmentHigher ratio of disbursement to commitment

    Stronger targeting of investment in direct serviceStronger targeting of investment in direct service

    delivery (education, health, agric.)delivery (education, health, agric.)

    Increased share of priority spendingIncreased share of priority spending

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    9/18

    iv. Planning and budgetingiv. Planning and budgeting

    PFM systems rebuiltPFM systems rebuilt

    PFM reforms have stronger linkage to budgetPFM reforms have stronger linkage to budgetsupportsupport

    Capacity development needs for PFM continueCapacity development needs for PFM continue

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    10/18

    v. Policies and policy processesv. Policies and policy processes

    ProPro--poor reform policies in placepoor reform policies in place

    Government ownershipGovernment ownership

    Policy process and dialogue more inclusivePolicy process and dialogue more inclusive

    Limitations on public/private sector linkagesLimitations on public/private sector linkages

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    11/18

    vi. Macroeconomic performancevi. Macroeconomic performance

    More focus on macroMore focus on macro--economic policy andeconomic policy andprocessesprocesses

    Supported disciplined budget managementSupported disciplined budget management

    Facilitates prudent fiscal managementFacilitates prudent fiscal management

    Rwanda registered strong macroRwanda registered strong macro--economiceconomicperformanceperformance

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    12/18

    vii. Delivery of public servicesvii. Delivery of public services

    Steady gains despite capacity challengesSteady gains despite capacity challenges

    Increased access to public serviceIncreased access to public service

    ProPro--poor spending in social sectors grewpoor spending in social sectors grew

    Within year predictability and timelinessWithin year predictability and timeliness

    challengedchallenged hampered service deliveryhampered service delivery

    Need to strength monitoring and evaluationNeed to strength monitoring and evaluation

    systemssystems

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    13/18

    viii. Poverty reductionviii. Poverty reduction

    Baselines for service delivery not establishedBaselines for service delivery not established

    Scarcity of data and statistics (greatly improvedScarcity of data and statistics (greatly improved

    now)now)

    Rebound effect after1994 effect makes it hardRebound effect after1994 effect makes it hardto demarcate the effect of public actionto demarcate the effect of public action

    This has changed with more reliable data. AbilityThis has changed with more reliable data. Abilityto compare trends improvedto compare trends improved

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    14/18

    ix. Sustainability of GBSix. Sustainability of GBS

    Rwandan context favorable for sustainabilityRwandan context favorable for sustainability

    Budget support volume has increasedBudget support volume has increased

    More donors have come on boardMore donors have come on board

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    15/18

    4. Major gaps in relation to impact4. Major gaps in relation to impactevaluationevaluation

    Evaluation established effect on policy andEvaluation established effect on policy andprocess indicators, not impact on developmentprocess indicators, not impact on developmentoutcomesoutcomes

    Rationale for Budget support is to maximizeRationale for Budget support is to maximizeimpact on development indicatorsimpact on development indicators

    Impact evaluation should link budget support toImpact evaluation should link budget support todevelopment results/outcomesdevelopment results/outcomes

    Approach not participatory, not inclusiveApproach not participatory, not inclusive

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    16/18

    Major gaps contdMajor gaps contd

    Fungibility of money means tracking impact ofFungibility of money means tracking impact ofeach $$$ is difficulteach $$$ is difficult

    Impact on private sector difficult to establishImpact on private sector difficult to establish

    Tendency for preferred sectors (social) crowdsTendency for preferred sectors (social) crowdsout growth sectors minimizing potential impactout growth sectors minimizing potential impacton overall development resultson overall development results

    Driven largely by policy and institutional reforms,Driven largely by policy and institutional reforms,less attention to implementation capacity gapless attention to implementation capacity gap

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    17/18

    5. Impact evaluation will be feasible5. Impact evaluation will be feasiblewith:with:

    Country owned strategy, government leadershipCountry owned strategy, government leadership

    Countries have a strong results framework, goodCountries have a strong results framework, goodstatistics and sound monitoring and evaluation systemstatistics and sound monitoring and evaluation system

    ResultsResults--based budgeting reforms may be required,based budgeting reforms may be required,linking spending to results/outcomelinking spending to results/outcome

    Incentive frameworkIncentive framework reward good performancereward good performance

    Links to mutual accountability is importantLinks to mutual accountability is important

    Harmonized indicator system for comparabilityHarmonized indicator system for comparability Predictable, longterm commitment, timely disbursementPredictable, longterm commitment, timely disbursement

    impact takes time to happenimpact takes time to happen

  • 8/7/2019 EvaluationRwanda_Lisbon

    18/18

    Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention