evidence-based management of the acute l umbar s pine

13
Evidence-Based Management of the Acute Lumbar Spine

Upload: rivka

Post on 25-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Evidence-Based Management of the Acute L umbar S pine. Our Goal. Early identification of the acute spine Based on current, high quality research Timely referral To an orthopedic manual therapist Maximize optimal outcomes Reduce risk of overall disability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Evidence-Based Managementof the Acute Lumbar Spine

Page 2: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

• Early identification of the acute spine– Based on current, high quality research

• Timely referral– To an orthopedic manual therapist

• Maximize optimal outcomes– Reduce risk of overall disability – Reduce burden on health care system

Our Goal

Page 3: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Lumbar Red Flags

Page 4: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Spinal ManipulationClinical Prediction Rule

• Flynn et al. Spine 2002– Symptoms < 16 days– FABQ < 19– No symptoms distal to

knee– Hip IR > 35o

– Lumbar hypomobility

• 4 or 5 had +LR 24.4 which equals 95% chance of successful outcome

Page 5: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

A Clinical Prediction

Rule to Identify

Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely to Benefit from

Spinal Manipulation: A Validation

Study

Page 6: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Treatment Groups• Childs et al. Ann Intern Med

2004• Manipulation

– First 2 sessions• Manipulation• AROM exercises

– Final 3 sessions• Stabilization exercises

• Hypothesis– Subjects in manipulation group

who fit CPR will have the best outcomes

Page 7: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Results

Subjects who were positive on the rule and treated with manipulation had greater improvements in pain and disability at 1

week, 4 weeks, and 6 months

Page 8: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Validation of Rule 4 or more present:

Symptoms < 16 daysFABQ < 19

No symptoms distal to kneeHip IR > 35o

Lumbar hypomobility

45% 92%

Page 9: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

The “2 Factor Rule”

• Recent onset (< 16 d)• No sx distal to knee45% 91%

Page 10: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine
Page 11: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Translation to Clinical Practice

• Patients with +CPR and received manipulation, the number needed to treat (NNT) for successful outcome:– One week: 1.3 – Four weeks: 1.9

• Lower NNT the more powerful the treatment effect– An NNT < 2 is quite

powerful

• Antibiotic cocktail to eradicate bacteria– NNT = 1.1

• Lipitor to prevent 1 heart attack– NNT = 16-23

• Crestor to prevent progression of plague build up– NNT = 7

Page 12: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Conclusion• High quality research indicates patient with acute

low back pain have a high probability of dramatic success following 2 physical therapy sessions

• Optimal outcomes are dependent on:– Identifying patients likely to benefit from manual therapy– Early referral to an evidence-based orthopedic manual

therapist

• At Kinetic Physical Therapy, we utilize state-of-the-art care by incorporating evidence-based manual therapy, exercise, and the application of a biopsychosocial model in managing cervical and lumbar disorders

Page 13: Evidence-Based Management of the Acute  L umbar  S pine

Supporting Article Summaries

• Flynn et al. Spine2002The objective of this study is to develop a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for identifying patients with low back pain who improve with spinal manipulation. A clinical prediction rule with five variables was identified. The presence of four of five of these variables increased the probability of success with manipulation from 45% to 95%. Overall, it appears patients with low back pain likely to respond to manipulation can be accurately identified.

• Childs et al. Annals of Int Med 2005The objective of this study was to validate a previous clinical prediction rule (Flynn et al. 2002) for identifying patients with low back pain who improve with spinal manipulation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive manipulation plus exercise or exercise alone by a physical therapist for four weeks. A patient who was positive on the clinical prediction rule and received a manipulation has a 92% chance of a successful outcome with an associated number needed to treat of 1.9 at four weeks.