evidence for translocation of in plants2evidence for translocation of iron in plants"2 a. l....

4
Evidence for Translocation of Iron in Plants" 2 A. L. Brown, Shogo Yamaguchi, and Jaime Leal-Diaz 3 Department of Soils and Plant Nutrition, and of Botany, University of California, Davis Iron is generally considered to be a very immobile element in growing plants. Localized absorption has been observed at a spot where a Fe solution sprayed on the foliage may cause a small area to become green. The fact that the surrounding chlorotic area remained chlorotic after spraying with Fe has led investigators to assume the Fe was immobile within the plant. Furthermore, workers in Kansas and Texas (6, 11) have reported that maximum yields of sorghum were obtained with 3 foliar sprays of ferrous sulfate solu- tion. This also tends to indicate that Fe is not trans- located, therefore new leaves as they become exposed must be sprayed for correction of Fe chlorosis. Bukovac and Wittwer (2) found that about 10 % of the Fe applied to a spot on a bean leaf was trans- located but this was only within the treated leaf. Doney et al. (5) using Fe59 found that 25 % of the Fe applied to a leaf was translocated to the apex leaves of bean plants. The work herein reported was designed to estab- lish whether foliar applied Fe was absorbed and trans- located, the possible pathway, and the extent of the translocation. Information on these points has im- portant implications insofar as correcting Fe chlorosis by foliar sprays is concerned. Materials and Methods Sorghum plants (Sorghums vulgare, L. var. RS 610) were grown in soil known to be Fe deficient for this particular species. Applications of N as (NH4)2- SO4 and P and K as KH2PO4 were sufficient for nor- mal growth. When the plants were in the fourth or fifth leaf stage of growth, Fe59 was applied in solu- tion to a portion of a leaf. The Fe solution was 10 mM FeCl2, pH 4.0, with a specific activity of about 100 /uc per ml. The leaf area to be treated was en- closed by applying a ring of lanolin so that the solu- tion would be absorbed from the enclosed area. The rates of application were 10 1ul, 20 pli, and 50 ,ul per leaf. 1 Received June 8, 1964. 2 The research reported in this paper was partially supported by Atomic Energy Commission contract AT (11-1)-34 Project No. 39. 3 Present address: Escuela de Agricultura y Gana- deria, Instituto Tecnologica de Monterrey, Sucursal de Correos "J", Monterrey, N.L. Mexico. 35 Four days after treatment with Fe59, the treated area of the leaf was discarded; the roots were freed of the soil by running tap water. An untreated chlorotic Fe deficient plant as well as an untreated green plant were included as controls. The plants were frozen with pulverized dry ice and freeze-dried and auto- radiographed essentially according to methods de- scribed by Yamaguchi and Crafts (12). This drying method is known not to permit any internal movement of substances during the drying time. The autoradiographs of the trial runs of sorghum showed considerable pseudoautograph, a smudging of the film in the areas of the buds and young enlarging leaves, by some volatile labile substance emanating from these organs during the film exposure time of 5 days. Therefore, the freeze-dried and mounted plants of later experiments were oven-treated for an hour at 60° and freed of the volatile substances and auto- graphed. Treatments of cotton (Gossypium hirsuttuim, L. var. Acala) plants were made in 2 ways. First, Fe59 was applied to the nutrient solution culture in which the cotton plant was growing, and secondly Fe59 in solution was applied to the basal region of a cotyle- donary leaf blade. Treatment was for 5 days. Bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris, L. var. Red Kid- ney) were germinated in perlite and grown in nutrient solution (8). To each set of 20 plants 31 Lmoles of FeSO4 were added 2 days before plants were trans- ferred to a CaCl,-KCl solution. After 2 hours in this latter solution pairs of plants were transferred to a CaCl,-KCl solution to which had been added 40 jtmoles of FeCl3 containing adequate Fe 59 for count- ing and autoradiographing. They remained in this latter solution for 48 hours, after which they were transferred to iron free Johnson solution (7) and allowed to grow for 26 more days. Leaf blade activity assays were made by cutting a disc of tissue on the twentieth and twenty-sixth days after the last transfer to Johnson solution. Leaf samples from 2 folioles were counted for determining the activity variations between them. The leaf tissue was counted immediately after removal from the plants. The counting values of the twenty-sixth days sampling were corrected for decay in relation to those of the twentieth day. The distribution of iron in the plant was expressed in cpm. Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evidence for Translocation of in Plants2Evidence for Translocation of Iron in Plants"2 A. L. Brown, Shogo Yamaguchi, and Jaime Leal-Diaz3 Departmentof Soils and Plant Nutrition, and

Evidence for Translocation of Iron in Plants"2A. L. Brown, Shogo Yamaguchi, and Jaime Leal-Diaz 3

Department of Soils and Plant Nutrition, and of Botany, University of California, Davis

Iron is generally considered to be a very immobileelement in growing plants. Localized absorption hasbeen observed at a spot where a Fe solution sprayedon the foliage may cause a small area to become green.The fact that the surrounding chlorotic area remainedchlorotic after spraying with Fe has led investigatorsto assume the Fe was immobile within the plant.Furthermore, workers in Kansas and Texas (6, 11)have reported that maximum yields of sorghum wereobtained with 3 foliar sprays of ferrous sulfate solu-tion. This also tends to indicate that Fe is not trans-located, therefore new leaves as they become exposedmust be sprayed for correction of Fe chlorosis.

Bukovac and Wittwer (2) found that about 10 %of the Fe applied to a spot on a bean leaf was trans-located but this was only within the treated leaf.

Doney et al. (5) using Fe59 found that 25 % of theFe applied to a leaf was translocated to the apex leavesof bean plants.

The work herein reported was designed to estab-lish whether foliar applied Fe was absorbed and trans-located, the possible pathway, and the extent of thetranslocation. Information on these points has im-portant implications insofar as correcting Fe chlorosisby foliar sprays is concerned.

Materials and Methods

Sorghum plants (Sorghums vulgare, L. var. RS610) were grown in soil known to be Fe deficient forthis particular species. Applications of N as (NH4)2-SO4 and P and K as KH2PO4 were sufficient for nor-mal growth. When the plants were in the fourth orfifth leaf stage of growth, Fe59 was applied in solu-tion to a portion of a leaf. The Fe solution was 10mM FeCl2, pH 4.0, with a specific activity of about100 /uc per ml. The leaf area to be treated was en-closed by applying a ring of lanolin so that the solu-tion would be absorbed from the enclosed area. Therates of application were 10 1ul, 20 pli, and 50 ,ul perleaf.

1 Received June 8, 1964.2 The research reported in this paper was partially

supported by Atomic Energy Commission contract AT(11-1)-34 Project No. 39.

3 Present address: Escuela de Agricultura y Gana-deria, Instituto Tecnologica de Monterrey, Sucursal deCorreos "J", Monterrey, N.L. Mexico.

35

Four days after treatment with Fe59, the treatedarea of the leaf was discarded; the roots were freed ofthe soil by running tap water. An untreated chloroticFe deficient plant as well as an untreated green plantwere included as controls. The plants were frozenwith pulverized dry ice and freeze-dried and auto-radiographed essentially according to methods de-scribed by Yamaguchi and Crafts (12). This dryingmethod is known not to permit any internal movementof substances during the drying time.

The autoradiographs of the trial runs of sorghumshowed considerable pseudoautograph, a smudging ofthe film in the areas of the buds and young enlargingleaves, by some volatile labile substance emanatingfrom these organs during the film exposure time of 5days. Therefore, the freeze-dried and mounted plantsof later experiments were oven-treated for an hour at60° and freed of the volatile substances and auto-graphed.

Treatments of cotton (Gossypium hirsuttuim, L.var. Acala) plants were made in 2 ways. First, Fe59was applied to the nutrient solution culture in whichthe cotton plant was growing, and secondly Fe59 insolution was applied to the basal region of a cotyle-donary leaf blade. Treatment was for 5 days.

Bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris, L. var. Red Kid-ney) were germinated in perlite and grown in nutrientsolution (8). To each set of 20 plants 31 Lmoles ofFeSO4 were added 2 days before plants were trans-ferred to a CaCl,-KCl solution. After 2 hours in thislatter solution pairs of plants were transferred to aCaCl,-KCl solution to which had been added 40jtmoles of FeCl3 containing adequate Fe 59 for count-ing and autoradiographing. They remained in thislatter solution for 48 hours, after which they weretransferred to iron free Johnson solution (7) andallowed to grow for 26 more days.

Leaf blade activity assays were made by cutting adisc of tissue on the twentieth and twenty-sixth daysafter the last transfer to Johnson solution. Leafsamples from 2 folioles were counted for determiningthe activity variations between them. The leaf tissuewas counted immediately after removal from theplants. The counting values of the twenty-sixth dayssampling were corrected for decay in relation to thoseof the twentieth day. The distribution of iron in theplant was expressed in cpm.

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Evidence for Translocation of in Plants2Evidence for Translocation of Iron in Plants"2 A. L. Brown, Shogo Yamaguchi, and Jaime Leal-Diaz3 Departmentof Soils and Plant Nutrition, and

36PLANT 1'[IYSIOLI.0\

Results and Discussion

The freeze-dried and mounted planLts (lower haltr)together with the corresponding autoradiographs (up-per half) are shown in figure 1.

Sorghumi. The picture in the upper left of figure 1shows the distribution of Fe"" in sorghum plants fol-lowving the application to a small area of a leaf. Thesection of the leaf to xvhich Fe was applied vas re-moved; this shovs as a break in the leaf. Fe applie.lto the leaf xvas absorbed and translocated to otherparts of the plant. A considerable portion of the Fe59"was translocated toward the tip in the leaf to xxhich itxvas applied as shox-vn by the image density of thefourth leaf. However, very significant amounts of

I I. 'I::

I;

If

Xi.

* ,... ,. I..

Fe'" xvere transporteI I)particularly to the activelygrowing regions, the newly forming leaves an l rooctips. The leaves imnmedliately above the treate l onesshowx medium labelling in the mid and basal regions.These regions xvere enlarging at the time of treatment.Fe "9 Nxvas carried by the assimilate stream from thetretel miiature leaf to all actively growing leaves an lroc;t tips. The mature regions traversed by the tracerill this translocation did not become as heavily labelled

s tlh.e.e ternln:dl regitn.- of the assimilate stream.The accumulation in the budl and at the root tips woul(lindicate transport by phloem. The higher (losage per-mitted proportionate or greater than proportionateaccumulation in the groxving bud leaves and also re-.i.lted in a little greening of the young developing leaf

.l

IA:

-. :l

...::

a.-'p 4~,'*O -,.'

FIG. 1. Autoradiographs of FeC5" translocation and distribution in sorghum and cotton. Upper row, the autoradio-graphs of the plants shown in the loxer row. Left, sorghum leaf treatments in order of 10 ( 1 tic), 20 (2 ,uc) and 50 (5 ,c )Al of Fe5" solution. The arrows point to position whence treated regions 1 cm long, were removed. Middle, 10(1.0 tic) MlA of Fe5) solution (pH 4) applied in 3 droplets over the 3 major veins of 1 cotyledon; film exposure timefor the treated leaf blade was 1 hour and the lighter distribution, such as that in the veins basal to the treatment,does not show; arrowx points to the cut whereby the leaf blade xas excluded during the film exposure, except for thelast hour. If exposed 5 days like the rest of the plant, the entire leaf would he black. Right, 10 (1 ,uc) Al of Fe5"9solution added to the culture solutioni, the arrow points to the cut where> the roots ere excluded during filmexpI)sure, except for the last hour.

I

36

SOONNo

4..3"

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 3: Evidence for Translocation of in Plants2Evidence for Translocation of Iron in Plants"2 A. L. Brown, Shogo Yamaguchi, and Jaime Leal-Diaz3 Departmentof Soils and Plant Nutrition, and

BROWN ET AL.-EVIDENCE FOR TRANSLOCATION OF IRON IN PLANTS

which accumulated the greatest amount of activity(fig 1) upper left frame, right plant.

The maintenance of image intensity in the bud andat root tips has resulted from continued movement ofthe tracer; whether by translocation from the treatedspot or by redistribution from maturing regionswhich were assimilate sinks at the time of treatment.

The light labeling of all the mature leaves, includ-ing the tip region of the leaf above the treated leaf, isfrom movement in the transpiration stream, directlyor as a result of leakage from the phloem. Some leak-age into the xylem, together with a strong phloemmovement has been characteristic of very mobile sub-stances, such as maleic hydrazide (4), and phosphateand sulfate (1).

Cotton. The distribution pattern of Fes9 in a cot-ton plant following application to a cotyledonary leafis shown in the autoradiograph, upper center of figure1. Here again while much of the applied Fe59 re-mained in the treated leaf, some has been transportedto newly forming leaves.

The intermediate leaves received only very slightamounts of Fe59. This is in great contrast to sorghumin which phloem transport was marked. In thetreated leaf of cotton there has been some movementtoward the leaf margin.

The primary distribution of Fe59 by phloem hasbeen slight. The small bud leaf shows a little higherconcentration of activity than the next 2 older leaves.This may be due to some continued phloem transloca-tion, redistribution, or dilution of the original accumu-lation due to leaf expansion.

The distribution pattern of Fe59 in a cotton plantfollowing application to the roots is shown in theupper right of figure 1. In this autograph the rootshad 1-hour film exposure rather than 5 days. Therewas no evidence of a coating of Fe *deposits on theroots. Whether or not root uptake and distributionof Fe in the shoots would be different if the pH weregreater than that used (pH 3.5) in the present experi-ments can only be surmised. There were no symip-toms of injury; growth of the plants was vigorousthroughout the treatment period.

The distribution of activity in the mature greenleaves (cotyledons and the next 2 leaves) was notuniform. The veins and especially the petiole of thecotyledons show accumulation. The 3 top leaves, be-

ing much darker than the lower ones, must have re-ceived Fe59 by phloem, and also by xylem because Fe59is xylem-mobile, as revealed by the image of the coty-ledons and the next leaf above which were fully de-veloped at the time -of treatment. The distribution ofactivity in the upper leaves is more uniform.

The maintenance of a little higher concentration ofactivity in the bud indicates some continued transport,whether by redistribution from the mature and matur-ing leaves or directly from the root. At any rate, thelimited evidence in cotton is for high apoplastic mobil-ity and low, but very definite symplastic mobility.

Red Kidney Bean. The concentrations of Fe59 inthe various leaves of the bean plant are shown in tableI. The counts are higher in the newest tissue, hencethere is a tendency for Fe to be translocated to theactively growing regions. It was observed that theolder leaves were normal green in color, while thenewest growth was usually quite chlorotic.

The 2 branches, whose Fe59 concentrations are in-cluded in table I, grew during the time following Feapplication. Thus their Fe supply must have been dueto redistribution within the plant. Again the newerleaves on these branches have the higher concentra-tions.

At the second sampling 26 days after Fe treat-ment, young leaves developing from buds in the axilsof at least 2 leaves, contained radioactive Fe. This Fealso must have been derived from other parts of thebean plant.

Autoradiographs prepared from one of these plantstreated in the same manner, showed a similar distrib-ution pattern of Fe59.

Contrary to what has been reported frequently, Feappears as a mobile element. Mature leaves translo-cate Fe to new growing points and these compete forthe available Fe.

It is not possible from the results of these studiesto determine which mode of transport is the more im-portant. The significant fact is that Fe either appliedto the root in nutrient solution or applied to the foliagemay be transported fairly rapidly to other parts of theplant, particularly to the actively growing regions.This may explain why Fe applied to a spot on a leafdoes not cause the whole leaf to become green. Theabsorbed Fe is rapidly transported through the con-ducting tissues, presumably in the phloem, to the ter-

Table I. Iron-59 Activity Found in Leaf Disc Samples from Various Lcaves of a Red Kidney Bean Plant20 Days after Treatment

The data are expressed in counts per minute and are averages for 2 discs, only 1 sample from 1 leaflet.

Leaf number

Primaryleaf 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

On main axisOn branch from

1st leaf nodeOn branch from2nd leaf node

435 560

435

485

775

610 76(0

335 510

845

6th

1035 1450

37

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Page 4: Evidence for Translocation of in Plants2Evidence for Translocation of Iron in Plants"2 A. L. Brown, Shogo Yamaguchi, and Jaime Leal-Diaz3 Departmentof Soils and Plant Nutrition, and

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

minal growing tissues. Chlorotic leaves (1o not re-

cover readily, particularly if they have reached a more

or less mature condition.The distribution of iron via the xylem and other

apoplastic regions is probably well enough understood,but the distribution of iron via the phloem is rela-tively new information. By phloem there is the pos-

sibility of continual redistribution within the plant.Direct evidence of Fe'5>' transport in the phloem is

lacking in this communication, however, the interpre-tation of the distribution pattern is based on directevideleces accumulated from transport in phloem andxylenm separated from each other over a short distance,Stout and Hoaglandl (10), Yamaguchi (13); fromsugar concentration analyses above andl below a

phloem girdle on the main stem of cotton, Mason andMfaskell (9 ) a;and front )hloem exudate analyses,

Crafts and Loreniz (3), Zinmmierman (14).

Summary

Translocation of Fe xxas studied using Fe59 insorghuni, cotton and beans. Applications were madeto the foliage and in nutrient culture solution.

From the autoradiographs andl counting it was

apparent that Fe ax as reasonably mobile under theconditions of the experiments. Fe was translocatedby phloem and xylem ancld moved pIarticularly to theactively growing young developing tissues.

Literature Cited

1. 1IDD)ULP11, O., S. BIDDULPli, R. CORv, AND H.KOoNTZ. 1958. Circulation patterns for phos-phorus, sulfur, and calcium in the bean plant.Plant Physiol. 33: 293-300.

2. BUKOVAC, M. J. AND S. H. WITTWER. 1957. Ab-sorption and mobility of foliar applied nutrients.Plant Physiol. 32: 428-35.

3. CRAFTS, A. S. AND 0. LORENZ. 1944. Fruit growthand food transport in cucurbits. Plant Physiol.19: 131-38.

4. CRAFTS, A. S. AND S. YAMAGUCnI. 1958. Com-parative tests on the uptake and distribution oflabelled herbicides by Zebrinia penidula and Tradcs-catia flumzinensis. Hilgardia 27(16) : 421-54.

5. DONEY, R. C., R. L. SMIITIH, AND H. H. WIEBE.1960. Effects of various levels of bicarbonate,phosphorus, and pH on the translocation of foliar-applied iron in plants. Soil Sci. 89: 269-75.

6. FISHER, F. L. AND L. KEYES. 1954. Chlorosis insorghum in the Rio Grande plain of Texas. TexasAgr. Expt. Sta. Progr. Rept. 1737.

7. JOHNSON, C. M., P. R. STOUT, T. C. BRoYER, AND

A. B. CARI-TON. 1957. Comparative chlorine re-

quirements of different plant species. Plant and

Soil 8: 337-53.8. LEAI.-DIAZ, JAIMF. 1964. 1'he uptake of ferrous

and ferric iron by Phascolits vu)lgdfaris L. var. RedKidnev. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California,Davis.

9. MASON, T. G. A\ND Ed. J. MASKELL. 1928. Studieson the transport of carbohydrates in the cottonplant. I. A study of diurnal variation in the carbo-hydrates of leaf, bark and wood and of the effectsof ringing. Ann. Botany 42: 189-253.

10. STOUT, P. R. AND D. R. HOAGLAND. 1939. Upwardan(l lateral movement of salt in certain plants as in-(licated by radioactive isotopes of potassium, sodium,and phosphorus absorbed by roots. Am. J. Botany26: 320-24.

11. WITHEF, L. V. AND E. NV. CARLSON. 1959. Foliarand soil applications of iron compounds to controliron chlorosis of grain sorghum. Agron. J. 51:474-76.

12. \AMAGLUCHI, S. AN) A. S. CRAFrS. 1958. Auto-ra(liograpilic. method for studying absorption andtranslocation of herbicides using C14-labelled com

pounds. Hilgardia 28(6): 161-91.13,. YAMAGIUCII, SuOWo. 1959. Comparative studies

with labelled herbicides on woody I)lants. Hil-gardia 29(4) : 171-204.

14. ZIIM.MERMAAN, M. H. 1957. Translocation of or-

ganic substances in trees. II. On the translocationmechanism in the phloem of white ash, Fra-rinusanwcric(oa L. Plant Physiol. 32: 399-404.

38

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.