excellence by design - north hills school district hills msa 2015... · 2015. 4. 14. · excellence...
TRANSCRIPT
Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools
Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN
A Self-Study for Accreditation
by the Middle States Association
NORTH HILLS HIGH SCHOOL
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
April 27-30, 2015
HEAD OF SCHOOL
JOHN W. KREIDER
PRINCIPAL, NORTH HILLS HIGH SCHOOL
INTERNAL COORDINATORS
MR. WILLIAM MCGAHEE
DR. DAVID BARKOVICH
3624 Market Street 2 West Philadelphia, PA 19104
Telephone: (267) 284-5000 FAX: (215) 662-0957
www.msa-cess.org
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction 1
Organization for Growth and Improvement 2
Introduction 2
The Internal Coordinators 2
The School's Planning Team 3
The Role of the School's Leadership and Governance 8
The Plan for Institutionalizing a Planning Ethic 9
The Plan for Communication and Awareness 10
The Plan for Periodic Reviews of the Plan for Growth
and Improvement 11
Profile of the School 12
Profile of the School 15
Profile of Student Performance 30
The School's Mission, Beliefs, and Profile of Graduates 56
Mission 56
Beliefs 57
Profile of Graduates 61
Profile of Organizational Capacity
Introduction 63
Philosophy/Mission Standard 66
Governance and Leadership Standard 71
School Improvement Planning Standard 79
Finances Standard 85
Facilities Standard 91
School Climate and Organization Standard 101
Page
Health and Safety Standard 110
Educational Program Standard 122
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard 131
Student Services Standard 142
Student Life and Student Activities Standard 151
Information Resources and Technology Standard 160
Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality for
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
Introduction 169
Keystone Algebra 1 173
Keystone Biology 175
Keystone Literature 176
The Plan for Growth and Improvement 185
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 1 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Introduction
North Hills High School is extremely proud to apply for Middle States Association of Colleges
and School Commission on Elementary and Secondary School’s “Excellence By Design”
accreditation. While we believe that our students are provided with a superior education, we also
remain resolved to pursue continuous improvement as we strive to achieve the highest levels of
excellence. The process of undergoing the “Excellence By Design” self-study has benefitted our
students, faculty, and community by allowing our school and associated stakeholders to
holistically examine our efforts and accomplishments to date.
This process was undertaken in the hope of discovering new innovative and effective ways to
accomplish growth. We strongly believe that the volunteer stakeholders who have donated their
time to assist with this self-study have made impressive efforts in regards to their charge of
objectively examining the entire education experience at North Hills High School for areas of
possible improvement. This is possible because each stakeholder understands the difference that
an education makes in each student’s life. Our district’s students, parents, staff, administration,
and our community truly embrace our school’s efforts and give our students a tremendous
amount of support by providing opportunities to them both inside and outside of the classroom.
These opportunities allow our students to become lifelong learners, gain lifelong memories,
showcase the talents they work extremely hard to gain, and pursue a wide variety of post-
secondary endeavors. Achieving the Excellence By Design accreditation will be an amazing
validation of our efforts and the achievements of our students.
North Hills High School is changing lives through education. While our school has many
remarkable achievements in its long history, it is our unified and continued commitment to
excellence that makes North Hills High School unique and relevant. Through motivated students,
empowered community members, and a highly skilled faculty, the North Hills High School
continues to flourish in times of shrinking district enrollments and limited funding. Several years
ago, the entire school adopted North Hills High School marching band’s motto of “Pride,
Tradition and Excellence.” This was a deliberate decision based on a long history of student
success and achievement. Through the cooperation and support with all of our stakeholders,
North Hills High School will continue to grow as a positive environment where students achieve
excellence. For us at North Hills High School, there is no other option. Our students, and our
school, are truly exceptional and deserve no less.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 2 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A. Internal Coordinators
The Internal Coordinators for the self-study and accreditation process are:
Name Role in the Institution
Mr. William McGahee Assistant Principal
Dr. David Barkovich Dean of Students
A.1 How and why were the Internal Coordinators selected? Mr. William McGahee and Dr. David Barkovich were selected based upon their extensive
education, secondary school expertise, capacity for leadership, and for their skills at program
coordination involving a variety of different stakeholders in the district. Mr. McGahee has been
employed in the North Hills School district since 2001. Bill taught as an English teacher at North
Hills School for eight years, successfully made the transition from contractual employee to
administrator when he appointed as an assistant principal at North Hills Junior High for one year,
and has been the assistant principal at North Hills High School for the last five years. As part of
his responsibilities, Bill oversees the 11th
and 12th
grade students as well as a number of
programs that relate to the Middle States process, including the AP exams, attendance concerns,
coordination with our career and technical center, and our in-house alternative school. Dr.
Barkovich has been a contractual faculty member since 2002. He has been a school counselor at
both the junior high and high schools and currently has a leadership role in the school counseling
department. David is a certified as an elementary school counselor, secondary school counselor,
supervisor of curriculum and instruction, and k-12 principal. He is one of only ten National
Board Certified Teachers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in his content area (School
Counseling). David has recently earned his doctorate degree in Educational Leadership.
A.2 How did the Internal Coordinators fulfill their role and responsibilities? Both Mr. McGahee and Dr. Barkovich worked diligently during this process. Mr. McGahee’s
expertise in school policy, governance, and as a classroom teacher enabled him to lead our staff
in reflective practice. Dr. Barkovich used his experience and previously established partnerships
with the teachers to rally the faculty and involve them in the process. Using their previously
established reputations and connections with students and parents, their approach was to
facilitate and empower all of the stakeholders in making this process their own and openly
discuss how to make positive changes for the school at large. The Internal Coordinators
attempted to utilize technology whenever possible to not only minimize printing costs, but in
order to manage the large amount of data involved with the process.
A.3 What kinds of support and assistance were provided to the Internal
Coordinators to enable them to fulfill their responsibilities? Both of these coordinators are fortunate to have strong relationships with the high school faculty,
are known to the parents and community and high school student body as strong advocates for
young people and their education, with building administration, with district administration, and
with school board. Both had previously worked with the superintendent and other administrators
over the past decade in different capacities (superintendent once held Bill’s position). The benefit
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 3 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
of being able to simply pick up the phone and get assistance from any senior member of the
central office administration cannot be understated. The top down commitment to the EBD
process is perhaps best illustrated in the following email that was sent by the district
superintendent, Dr. Patrick Mannarino, to the administrators last fall:
From: Pat Mannarino
Date: Friday, October 31, 2014 12:58 PM
Subject: Middle States
Folks,
The Middle States Accreditation process is a very important, yet time consuming, process. It is a monumental task
in itself, let alone while you are attempting to manage a school. SO, please work with the internal coordinators to
provide any needed information and return them to Bill and Dave so they can appropriately process them for the
Middle States Planning Team. If you have any questions or concerns, see me!
Pat
B. The Planning Team
B.1 The members of the Planning Team are: Name Role in the Institution
Andrew Cook Student, grade 11
Danielle Galbraith Student, grade 11
Maria Melchiorre Student, grade 12
Brett Sopher Student, grade 12
Lauren Tucci Student, grade 11
Kelly Reith Parent
Kathleen Sopher Parent
Kathleen Tucci Parent
Jennifer Swab Parent
Alice Kilroy Parent
Crystal Barr Community Member
Daria White Community Member
Chris Cummings NH Faculty (Math)
Jennifer DiPasquale NH Faculty (Science: biology)
Regina Moorby NH Faculty (GATE and art)
Joseph Warnock NH Faculty (Math)
Missi Marangoni NH faculty (World language: French)
Laura Clark NH faculty (Science)
Sue Batson NH faculty (Science Curriculum Leader)
Jaime DeWeese NH faculty (Social Studies)
Kim Zwicker NH faculty (Special Education)
Michael Scarpaci NH faculty (Technology education)
Sandra Miller NH faculty (Library sciences)
Amy Patsilevas NH faculty (Family/Consumer Science)
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 4 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. What charge was given to the Planning Team? What authority was it given to
oversee, monitor, and make decisions regarding the school’s planning for
growth and improvement in student performance and organizational capacity? One of the first assignments for the Internal Coordinators (Mr. William McGahee and Dr.
Barkovich) was to form the Planning Team and introduce them to their duties. This gathering
would serve as the leadership group which would head this Excellence by Design Middle States
process as outlined by the Middle States Commission. Following the suggestions in the
Excellence by Design guide, members of various stakeholder groups were invited to participate
in this group. These groups included: faculty leaders from varied academic subjects; students
recommended by faculty members familiar with their leadership experience; parents and
volunteers who have been active in community and school organizations; and members of the
Board of Directors. Having a group that included a wide variety to stakeholders such as students,
parents, community members, and faculty representatives from many departments allowed for a
holistic self-study. With the inclusion of Mr. McGahee and Dr. Barkovich, this team had the
authority to speak with any interested stakeholder regarding this self-study, plan meetings and
seek out information as they saw fit, and act as representatives of the Planning Team both
internally at faculty meetings and externally to the community. Both the building and district
administration gave them the autonomy to ask challenging questions in order to discover areas in
which our students could be better served. Cooperation was received at every level of the school
district by the Planning Team.
B.3 How does the membership of the Team reflect the diversity within the
school’s community of stakeholders? The Middle States recommendations for membership reflecting the broad representation of the
institution’s stakeholder groups were adhered to. Parent volunteers live in both Ross Township
and West View Borough, the two communities that make up our district. Beginning with the
student members recommended by faculty members for their leadership and academic
accomplishments, these young men and women offered a perspective to the rest of the team that
was unique and invaluable in the process. This subgroup consisted of 11th
and 12th
grade students
from both genders. Our community members were all parents of either present or past high
school students. Faculty members volunteered to participate with a request that each curricular
area be represented. It is important to note that the diverse group of faculty members from the
many different curricular areas that are represented on the Planning Team came about upon the
very first request for faculty volunteers.
B.4 How were the members of the Planning Team selected? The planning team was comprised completely of volunteers who wish to contribute to our
school’s dedication to excellence and improvement. All of these stakeholders were notified via
open invitations posted to our district and high school website, via an opening day meeting on
the first day for faculty, via weekly email blast to subscribers, and via personal invitation. An
informational meeting was held on August 27, including a presentation by both Internal
Coordinators describing the Excellence by Design process and the important role the Planning
Committee would have in this undertaking. After all questions were answered to everyone’s
satisfaction, the next meeting date was announced with the understanding that an agenda would
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 5 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
be forwarded before that time. The faculty members indicated their interested by completing a
Google Doc data collection tool (below).
B.5 How does the Planning Team function and make its decisions? The Planning team utilized the guidelines presented by the Excellence by Design, which
encouraged all to not only listen but to contribute ideas in the team meetings. The Planning Team
established “Middle States Mondays” as an informal term referencing that the Team would meet
nearly each Monday of the 2014-15 school year after school. To help facilitate this, the Planning
Team chair published an agenda before each meeting allow members of the committee to think
about the next meeting’s issues beforehand. Dr. David Barkovich coordinated the
communication efforts as part of his duties in his position would include alerting members of
meeting times and forwarding attachments of items that would be discussed in the following
session. In addition, Dr. Barkovich was given the task of guiding the Planning Team
discussions. This was done purposefully as Dr. Barkovich, as a fellow faculty member and
fellow contractual employee, does not supervise any other faculty. Therefore the Planning Team
discussions could be undertaken free from the pressure of any feelings of being evaluated by an
administrator/supervisor.
Members of the team who were not able to attend these presentations were given a
summary of these reports at the next team meeting. The team was also kept current on what was
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 6 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
transpiring at the high school during the entire process either by being invited to various in-
service days or by being debriefed at a Planning Team meeting. For example, one of the most
important decisions the team made was choosing the three objectives, which would be the basis
of our action plan. First, the team was notified of the meetings to make this long term goal when
the process began in August of 2015. Next, the team was kept informed of the background
information to make this decision as member was provided with summary reports from each of
the Standards Groups.
The Planning team discussed the findings of the Standards meetings and surveys and by
linking this to the mission, philosophy, and the student profile they proposed three goals for the
school to strive for. The Internal Coordinators informed the Planning Team to keep in mind that
our objectives were to be measurable and academic so that students would be the beneficiaries of
our effort. The Planning Team quickly concluded that our standards reports were generally
positive and concluded that these twelve standards were being met. After several meetings of
discussion and debate and each member was assigned the “homework” of writing three
objectives based on the findings of these reports. From this brainstorming, combined with
extensive faculty input at during professional development days, it was proposed that three
performance objectives would be established. At the next several meetings these proposed
objectives were openly discussed, agreed upon with consensus from the Planning Team, and it
was decided that other concerns presented by the reports could be combined into these three in
different ways.
The team planned that the proposed list of objectives would be ready to be submitted in
late February of 2015 in the form of the Technical Review. After the objectives were forwarded
to the MSA-CESS on March 11, 2015, the Planning Team received the confirmation that our
technical review had been reviewed on March 17, 2015. The Internal Coordinators discussed
these suggestions with the Planning team at the next “Middle States Monday” and did make the
small required revisions as requested. A second draft of the Technical Review was sent back to
the Accreditation Officer to Middle States on March 23, 2015 and was approved that same day.
This news was joyously received by the Planning Team once word this accomplishment was
distributed. As illustrated by these examples, the Planning team conducted all meetings as open
discussions that led to almost immediately led to a consensus. We had no instances of serious
disagreement. According to the feedback received everyone felt comfortable sharing their
opinions and reaching a consensus.
B.6 How often did the Planning Team meet? (Provide a list of the Team’s meetings
and minutes for the meetings in the Team’s workroom.) Each of the planning team meetings was held in the high school classroom D108. This was
chosen due to the proximity to the front of the school so that stakeholder guests such as parents
and community members could easily attend and find the room. It also contained the LCD
projector, smart board, document projector, and computer that was utilized nearly ever session.
The desks in the classroom very frequently moved to form small groups and to facilitate
discussion. The first “Middle States Monday” was held on September 22, 2014. Other Planning
Team meetings occurred on:
September 9th
and 29th
of 2014
October 6th
, 20th
, and 27th
of 2014
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 7 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
November 4: Morning pre-meeting before a full day (7.5 hours) of an Standard-related
MSA-CESS related full high school faculty professional development day
November 3rd
and 10th
, 17th
of 2014
December 3: Standards-related PD meetings for all 12 standards
December 8th
and 15th
of 2014
January 14th
and 26th
of 2015
February 2nd
, 9th
, 16th
, 23rd
of 2015
March 2nd
of 2015: Final MSA Planning Team meeting
March 9th
: Planning Team transformed into Action Teams
March 16th
, 23rd
, 30th
: Action team Meetings
B.7 What is the Planning Team’s relationship to any other groups in the school, if
any, responsible for planning for growth and improvement in student
performance? The 2014-15 North Hills Middle States “Excellence By Design” Planning Team was an original
gathering of stakeholders. No previous relationship existed or contributed to the formation of this
team. It was comprised entirely of volunteers interested in achieving the highest levels of success
that our school is capable of.
B.8 What is the Planning Team’s plan for rotating membership of the Team and
identifying new members? What is the plan for training and orienting new
members to the work of the Team? All members of the Planning Team are anticipated to remain as part of the North Hills faculty or
community through 2022 with just one exception. One science department faculty member will
be retiring at the midpoint of the next school year, but the presence of two other members of the
science department on the Planning Team indicate that a replacement member will not be
appointed when this occurs. At the opening ceremonies of each school year from 2015 through
2022, the opportunity to become a new member of the MSA-CESS Planning Team will be made
available to the entire faculty, student body, and community via announcements and the internet.
Interested parties will be trained by the internal coordinators on an individual basis and
incorporated into the larger ongoing meetings that will occur through 2022.
B.9 How will the Planning Team function after the visit of the Visiting Team and
during the implementation of the Plan for Growth and Improvement? The Middle States Accreditation Implementation process will serve to drive building-based goals
of North Hills High School over the next six years. North Hills High School’s 2014-15 Planning
Team will create yearly timelines outlining the implementation of three objectives. A sub-
committee of the Planning will be charged with the creation of these timelines based on the three
separate approved performance objectives in the final month of the 2014-15 school year. Each
timeline will detail the activities that are scheduled for completion in that school year (per the
Action Plan timeline), and the persons responsible and resources necessary to complete said
activities. This team will select the individuals responsible for the year’s activities. The
administrative team will oversee periodic progress checks during the implementation process
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 8 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
during each school year. The Planning team will convene in May of each school year to review
progress, to make recommendations, and to ensure revisions to existing implementation plans are
carried through to the next school year.
C. Role of the School’s Leadership and Governance
C.1. What role has the school’s leadership and governance played in the self-study
process and the planning for growth and improvement in student
performance? Due to significant organizational changes during the 2013-14 school year in which our secondary
students and faculty transitioned from a 7-9-Junior High and a 10-12 High school to a 7-8
Middle School and a 9-12 High School, the pursuit of the Middle States re-accreditation was
delayed one year. After the reorganization at the high school had been completed, a directive was
issued which would start the process toward the renewal of accreditation under the direction of
Mr. John Kreider, the principal of North Hills High School. Mr. John Kreider chose the
Excellence by Design as the means for accreditation and it was his responsibility to appoint two
internal coordinators to lead the re-accreditation efforts.
From the central administrative office to the building level principals, generous support
has been given to initiate and propel the MSA-CESS self-study process. Mr. Kreider and the
district level administration were very supportive of the process. He granted the team great
autonomy in the planning and implementation of the EBD process. He provided time for the staff
to discuss our needs and make plans for positive changes. He provided superior leadership
during the process while encouraging self-reflection and positive change.
C.2. How has the leadership provided support for the self-study and accreditation
processes? Such an addition to the professional workload could only be accomplished by providing time
allotted by central and building administration to accomplish all that is required. The
administrative approval of in-service hours, faculty meetings, “Middle States Mondays”, and the
use of the after school professional time were essential for accomplishing this challenge. At
both central and building levels, not only have the challenges been issued to strive for going
from “good to great,” but the support and leadership needed in order to achieve this had been
consistently demonstrated.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 9 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.3. If the school is part of a larger system of schools, what role did the leadership
and governance of the system play in the planning process? What kind of
support did that leadership and governance provide for the school’s planning
efforts? As evidence in the previously quoted email, the North Hills administration provided the school
and team with full cooperation and access to resources. The funding needed to host the visit was
readily provided once a process for documentation was established. Additionally, the
administrators worked with the internal coordinators to provide the time and data needed to
complete the self-assessment.
D. The Plan for Institutionalizing a Planning Ethic When the internal coordinators were approached by the head of the school regarding the
yearlong EBD Self-Study planning process, both short-term and long-term plans were devised.
The Internal Coordinators communicated the start of the process to the staff via regular Friday
EEC (Education Excellence Committee, which was established over a decade ago) meetings,
which is made up of the high school curriculum leaders. These building leaders conveyed the
information back to their departments, but the internal coordinators also were budgeted time
during each month after school faculty meetings (8 in all during school year/EBD process). The
Internal coordinators were aware of the importance of parental, community, and central office
involvement and began soliciting volunteers to be members of the Planning Committee and
Action Teams. Those who volunteered were invited to all Planning Action Team meetings.
Meetings were held nearly every Monday and during professional development days. Parents
were regularly notified of the EBD process and purpose via the district website. The Internal
Coordinators, with the help of the administrative team for the school, divided up the staff into 12
committees and an entire professional development day (November 4, 2014) as well a follow up
Standard meeting (December 3, 2014) was set aside for these teams to meet. Each committee
was given one of the 12 Standards to review and research. Parents, students, and staff were each
surveyed and each committee analyzed and evaluated the results of the survey to gain knowledge
of the school’s place or standing with respect to that standard. These data evaluations occurred at
each weekly “Middle States Monday” meeting and on professional development days.
The next task was to develop objectives. This process began with a survey to the
entire faculty during a faculty meeting to seek ideas and to identify themes based upon the
previously discussed mission/vision/core values and the 12 Standards. Afterwards, the Planning
Team had weekly meetings where the two student performance goals and one organizational
capacity goal were decided upon. Electronic methods of gathering information from school staff
and the community were utilized frequently. Subsequent Planning meetings consisted of open
discussions sessions where staff contributed ideas for each goal. Faculty were invited to come to
“Middle States Mondays” whenever they wished to provide input and if an idea popped into their
head after an update was provided. The objective themes were organized by the Internal
Coordinators and returned to the Planning Team for consensus. Next, the Planning Team
reviewed the 12 Standards one final time for accuracy and to allow for and additional input.
Nearly an entire school years’ worth of plans and meetings culminated in the final document. A
communication plan was put into place to inform and prepare the community, students, and
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 10 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
parents for the visit. Notices were placed in the Elinks (email blasts to subscribers), announced at
board meetings and Open House, publicized on the NH website and on social media. The
Planning Team decided to inform students with in a fun manner using the EBD. A group of
student volunteers from the theater classes created an informative commercial video to prepare
and excite the students in the weeks leading up to the visit.
E. A Plan for Communication and Awareness As previously stated, an open invitation to all stakeholders was advertised via every available
medium in the fall of 2014. Again, the faculty was notified via a MSA-CESS presentation on
opening day of the 2015 school year. Additionally, personal invitations were extended to certain
stakeholders such as students and parents to ensure that we had full participation in this process.
All stakeholders were invited to a welcome meeting on September 9th in which we set the
expectations for the group and designed a schedule. Technology was used to communicate as
much as possible. Meeting notices will be sent via email and Outlook meeting reminders. The
North Hills website was updated with planning process update as well as an open invitation to
parents and community members. Students will be informed of the accreditation process via
student produced informative announcements and videos. These will were shown periodically
throughout the 2014-15 school year. Once the EBD was completed, it was made available to all
stakeholders for review on the district website. Prior to the visit, stakeholders are encouraged to
questions, propose changes, and acknowledge positive actions. Feedback will be collected,
analyzed and, if necessary, implemented by the team.
The Internal Coordinators attempted to utilize technology whenever possible to not only
minimize printing costs, but in order to manage the large amount of data involved with the
process. An example of the Google Form used to collect feedback at the end of the initial MSA
faculty meeting on August 21, 2014 is below:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 11 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The Internal Coordinators reviewed the responses in front of the large group and
addressed each concern point by point.
F. A Plan for Periodic Reviews of the Plan for Growth and
Improvement Many aspects of the EDB objectives that were developed during the self-study were already
coming to light separate from the process. Therefore, there are already plans to periodically
review and examine these issues. The Planning team will meet quarterly to evaluate data and
reports from stakeholders regarding progress and implementation of the objectives. For
assessments related to the student performance objectives, assessment data will be studied and
interventions will be implemented as each year’s overall and subgroup test scores are analyzed.
Surveys and informal meetings will also provide data and information on the progress towards
implementation of the established goals.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 12 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL’S COMMUNITY
A.1. Provide a description of the community. Describe its history and major
characteristics, including geographic location and socioeconomic and
demographic makeup. North Hills School District is comprised of West View Borough and Ross Township in
Allegheny County and located in the northern suburbs of metropolitan Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
The district was formed as the North Hills School Jointure in 1948, and in 1965, the two districts
merged to form North Hills School District. The district covers a 14.6 square mile area with a
population of nearly 40,000 residents. The two municipalities combine the attractiveness of
suburban living with the easily accessible cultural and educational opportunities that Pittsburgh
has to offer. Ross Township boasts a strong retail corridor on McKnight Road. Shopping malls,
restaurants, specialty shops and other commercial establishments are conveniently located and
serve a large portion of Allegheny County. West View offers a main street area with locally-
owned and supported small businesses. In addition, numerous recreational facilities and parks are
located in and adjacent to the two communities.
Ross Township became a first-class township in 1922 and a police force was added to the
township in 1940. Ross Township’s demographics are reflective of many of suburban Pittsburgh
communities. It is the 36th
most populated municipality in Pennsylvania. According to the U.S.
Census Bureau, Ross Township’s estimated population is 31,132 and remains relatively steady
each year. The community is predominately white with nearly four percent of census respondents
noting another race. The median home value is $149,900, and nearly 75 percent of Ross
Township residents own their homes. Nearly 20 percent of Ross Township residents are under
age 18 and approximately 21 percent are age 65 and older. The median household income in
Ross Township is $55,210. Nearly 90 percent of Ross Township residents are high school
graduates, nearly 33 percent have a bachelor’s degree and 12 percent hold a graduate or
professional degree.
West View was established in 1905. It was home to West View Park, one of Pittsburgh’s
most popular amusement parks from 1906 to 1977. The park’s former location now features a
shopping center with national retailers. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, West View
Borough’s estimated population is 6,759 and is projected to remain at those levels for the
foreseeable future. The community is predominately white with less than four percent of census
respondents noting another race. Nearly 30 percent of West View residents are under age 18 and
nearly 14 percent are over age 65. The median home value is $112,800, and nearly 68 percent of
West View residents own their homes. The median household income in West View is $50,938.
More than 90 percent of West View residents are high school graduates and nearly 30 percent
have a bachelor’s degree or higher.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 13 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. Describe any changes in the community occurring over the last five years that
have had an impact on the school. Indicate any changes that are expected to
occur during the next five years.
Last Five Years: Over the last five years, small updates and improvements have been made to Ross Township and
West View Borough. Occupation of storefronts along the McKnight Road corridor, one of the
most viable commercial thoroughfares in suburban Pittsburgh, remained high with most
vacancies being filled in a short timeframe. A countywide reassessment of all properties was
instituted to equalize and fairly levy taxes. Currently, millions of dollars of taxes levied on
properties in North Hills School District are being contested.
Next Five Years: Due to the small geographic area comprising North Hills School District, few new development
opportunities exist due to lack of vacant property. However, three new housing developments are
slated for construction. Dozens of townhomes are under construction, and plans are underway for
a residential development of nearly 300 single-family homes slated to sell for more than
$300,000 each and a smaller development with similar pricing. The larger housing development
will be constructed on the former site of the Highland Country Club and its adjacent golf course.
On the site of the district’s former Northway Elementary School and adjacent shopping center,
developers also plan to revitalize the current, dated and failing shopping center with a mix of
retail, office and restaurant space. An extended legal battle pertaining to a recent countywide
property reassessment will be settled. Since the assessments were meant to equalize taxes and
not simply increase taxes, the district may see a small increase in taxes upon settlement of all
contested assessments.
A.3. Describe the major challenges currently faced by the community—social,
economic, political. As with all communities in the United States, the area is still rebounding from the economic
collapse of recent years. However, housing prices, which remained relatively stable compared to
the nation as a whole, are on the rise, and homes continue to be built and sold in the area.
Commercial development continues to be a steady fixture as well with new businesses occupying
many storefronts alongside veteran retailers. The largest issue facing the district would be a lack
of available open properties as the trend in the area is to development new sites rather than
redeveloping existing ones as the developer plans at the former Northway Elementary School
area noted above.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 14 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.4. List the major educational and cultural programs and facilities in the
community that are available for use by the schools and their students.
Program/Facility
Northland Public Library
Carnegie Museum of Art
Carnegie Museum of Natural History
Carnegie Science Center
Heinz History Center
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
The Children’s Museum of Pittsburgh
Carlow University
Carnegie Mellon University
Chatham University
Duquesne University
Point Park University
Robert Morris University
University of Pittsburgh
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 15 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL
B.1. History of the School:
Provide a brief history of the school. Include key milestones and developments in the
life of the school. The district was formed as the North Hills School Jointure in 1948, and in 1965, the two districts
merged to form North Hills School District. Shortly after, new schools were constructed and
other buildings were used for different ages of students to accommodate the new student
population.
Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, North Hills continued to grow and was noted as
AAAA, the sports designation utilized for the largest school districts in Pennsylvania. Academic,
arts and athletic programs were noted as some of the best in the area with graduates gaining
successful careers or admission into prestigious universities upon graduation. North Hills
continued to have a steady student population due to its proximity to the city of Pittsburgh and
the delay in housing and commercial developments further north that would occur more heavily
starting in the 1990s. Today, approximately 90 percent of graduates continue their education
after high school.
In the 1990s, North Hills School District saw some difficult financial times that were
righted by a business director still handling the district’s finances today. As in the decades
previous, North Hills continued to enjoy a steady student population, academic, arts and athletic
success. However, some buildings began to show wear, and the district began initial discussions
about how to handle the issues related to the district’s seven elementary schools. Many of the
buildings existed from the original formation of the district in the ‘50s and ‘60s and exceeded
their useful lives. In addition, the district was in the beginning stages of a districtwide technology
program that continues to present day with a goal of equipping North Hills students with the
latest and best educational technology.
Led by this plan, North Hills also embarked on renovations at its junior high and senior
high buildings that share a hilltop campus. A renovated North Hills Junior High School opened
to the community in 1996 with updated finishes, improved technology and refinished
classrooms. North Hills Senior High School renovations were completed in 2007 and offered
students integrated educational technology, updated finishes, a professional television studio and
a theater-like auditorium for drama and arts performances among many other features.
One of the then-seven elementary schools, West View Elementary received a complete
overhaul that was completed in 2006. The elementary school previously housed junior high and
high school students during the district’s early years. It retained that historical significance, while
also gaining updates to benefit students. In 2006, North Hills instituted an elementary facilities
plan that sought to close three district elementary schools and renovate three remaining buildings
to have four comparable elementary schools with enrollments of 500 to 550 students. The plan
was completed in 2011 with the opening of Ross Elementary School joining the two other
renovated buildings – Highcliff and McIntyre elementary schools. The renovations provided all
elementary students in North Hills with a 21st century learning environment and alleviated long-
standing program and facilities inequities that permeated the district’s elementary schools.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 16 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
North Hills School District continues to be a nationally recognized public education institution
receiving annual awards from the Carnegie Science Center, the Washington Post and
BlackBoard.
In addition to this information, our school and our students are fortunate to have access to
very extensive historical records regarding the origins of the community. The following
information is utilized in several different curricular areas at the high school: Initially, the
infrastructure of West View and Ross first originated because of their proximity to a road.
Before this road was known as Perrysville Avenue, Perry Highway or Route 19, it was the
Allegheny and Perrysville Plank Roads, the Franklin Road and long before any of those, the
Venango Indian Path, used by Cornplanter Indians. The Indian routes were narrow, 18-inch wide
paths, which followed the course requiring the least exertion for men carrying burdens. The
Venango Path started at Shannopin’s Town (Pittsburgh) and went north through West View to
Perrysville and through the northern communities until it ended at Fort Presque Isle in Erie.
When the route north to the new town of Franklin, at the mouth of the French Creek, became
more important for transporting goods, the Franklin Road was born. It was a wider road that
could accommodate wagons and carts. In 1849, the Perrysville Plank Road was commissioned
and constructed as a one-lane toll road. Wooden planks about 8 inches wide, 3 inches thick, and
of varying lengths were laid horizontally across vertical stringers placed on a reasonably
prepared roadbed. At the start of the 1849, improvements began at the City line near Waldorf
Street, just below today’s Franklin Road (the only remnant of the first Franklin Road) and
Perrysville Avenue. After 1849, Franklin Road would be known as the Perrysville Plank Road.
To pay for the improvements on the Perrysville Plank Road, tolls were collected at four toll gates
established between the City line and Perrysville. The toll keepers lived in tollhouses along the
roads and raised and lowered tollgates, permitting travelers access to various sections of the road.
The wooden planks of the road were not durable and were replaced frequently. Between 1910
and 1911, the Plank Road was paved with bricks from the City line as far north as the
intersection with Three Degree Road. The advent of the automobile made the bumpy bricked
Perryville Plank Road obsolete. Macadam replaced the bricks until the era of concrete paving
arrived. By 1927, the need for a direct paved route from Pittsburgh to Erie was envisioned and
the Pennsylvania Department of Highways awarded a contract for The Perry Highway, named
for Commodore O.H. Perry. On November 23, 1929, the citizens of West View and Ross
celebrated the completion of the highway through the Borough with a ribbon cutting ceremony.
In the l970s, demolition of hundreds of homes and familiar landmarks along Perry Highway
began in preparation for the changes created by the construction of Interstate 279.
Historical records regarding the ownership of the land making up these communities is
also available. As the records indicate, all of the land west of the Allegheny and north of the
Ohio rivers remained "Indian country" until October 1784, when the "Last Purchases" were
made from the Indians at Fort Stanwix (Rome, N.Y), comprising all the land from the Allegheny
to the western boundary of Pennsylvania. During the war of the Revolution, in order to induce
men to stay in the Pennsylvania Line of the Continental Army and to encourage enlistments, the
Assembly, by resolution, promised to donate land to the soldiers. These certificates were to be
taken in payment for land were redeemable in gold or silver. In the latter case, the land was sold
at auction in Philadelphia, for a short period at Lancaster, and the money applied to the
depreciation pay of the soldier. Depreciation tables were set up for calculation the adjusted
amount. The northern part of the Last Purchase lands was divided off to an east-west line a few
miles south of the present New Castle and north of Butler and designated Donation Lands.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 17 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Everything south of the line to the rivers was designated the "Depreciation Tract". This
comprised all of Allegheny County north of the rivers, the southern parts of Beaver and Butler,
and western Armstrong Counties. Of course, the area now Ross Township was wholly within the
Depreciation Tract. At first it was part of Pitt Township, Westmoreland County, until the
erection of Allegheny County in 1788. In 1796, the part west of Surveyor Cunningham's district
was partitioned off by the north-south line running nearly through the mouth of Pine Creek and
formed into Pine Township. 1803, Ohio Township was formed by partitioning off that part lying
west of Surveyor Douglas' district, which included all the present western tier of Townships and
boroughs on the Ohio River. This left Pine with a strip of land, comprising the districts of
Douglas and Jones, six miles wide and sixteen long, from the rivers to the Butler County line.
In five years, land in the southern part of Pine Township was being taken up rapidly. On
November 15, 1808, thirty residents of that area petitioned the country courts to divide the
township "by a line from the eight-mile tree of Franklin Road (formerly the Venango Path),
running due east and west". The borough of Allegheny was formed in 1828 and took that part of
Ross Township nearest the Allegheny River. In 1847, the formation of Shaler Township took
away about two miles from the eastern side of Ross; so that from that time the township has
remained as it is today, except for the formation of the West View Borough in 1905. At the turn
of the twentieth century, Pittsburgh was experiencing a period of unprecedented growth. The
Allegheny-Bellevue Land Company, under the leadership of president William V. Callery, had
its agent, The Freehold Real Estate Company, acquire hillside and farmlands that had been part
of the original large tracts of Reel, Hilands-Collins, Scott and Robinson. Total purchase price for
the one square mile borough was $276,500, with the land price being $536 per acre. A total of
640 acres were purchased, and the Land Company recorded six housing plans in the area
between 1903 and 1914. The eastern portion of what would become West View Borough was
developed. The company formed the Allegheny-Bellevue Railways Company, which was
instrumental in extending streetcar service from Pittsburgh to the new developments. The
Allegheny-Bellevue Railways Company was one of the more than 200 companies that were
predecessors of the Pittsburgh Railways Company that served the communities of West View
and Bellevue in later years.
Our students are fortune to be able to access historical records and learn about the
pioneers that played important roles in the early settlement and development of West View and
Ross. Casper Reel came to Allegheny County in 1783 and was the first settler and probably first
to build a cabin in the West View/Ross area. He served under General Washington and was
present at the battle of Brandywine and other engagements. Also he became the first tax
collector north of the Allegheny and Ohio Rivers. Barnabas Hilands was another early settler to
West View who established his farm in 1794. The bulk of the Hiland’s land grants made up the
land which ultimately became the Borough of West View. Peter Ivory, Sr. immigrated to
America in 1817, and in 1819 purchased farmlands in the West View/Ross area. By the end of
1819, he had built the Four Mile House along the Franklin Road, near what would become Ivory
Avenue, named after this illustrious founding family. Fred Schwitter was born in Switzerland
on March 8, 1847, and though a penniless immigrant, he had saved enough money to start the
dairy business that eventually became a model dairy for farms across western Pennsylvania. He
built a large mansion on the Plank Road reminiscent of the house he remembered in Switzerland.
It was located at the current location of the West View Elementary School. Frederick C.
Martsolf was born in Butler, Pennsylvania in 1848. Between 1897 and 1904, he bought and
developed more than 50 properties in McKees Rocks, Stowe, Chartiers, Bellevue, and Ross,
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 18 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
work in frequently with the Allegheny-Bellevue Land Company. He built 50 houses in the West
View area and gathered support from interested locals and the Allegheny-Bellevue Land
Company. Martsolf was elected president of the first seven- member Borough council. As a
tribute to his vision, determination and perseverance, he was named the “Father of West View”
at the 2005 the centennial of the Borough.
The North Hills School District is made up of both Ross Township and the West View
Borough. It is generally conceded that the West View name came from pioneers, traveling north
from the city, who fully appreciated the glorious view to the west as they came down the
Venango Trail. Few people, aside from local historians, realized that the name was used for three
different areas along this trail. The 1876 Atlas of Allegheny County placed West View Post
Office or Village nearly a mile and a half further south than today’s borough line. This village
was located at the Perrysville Plank Road intersection with Ivory Avenue. The little hilltop
community was named because of the magnificent western view of the valley below. About a
mile north of West View Village on the east side of the Perrysville Plank Road near Cemetery
Lane was another little community also referred to by some as West View because of the large,
pretentious West View Hotel, famous for good food and its racetrack. Today, many commuters
going north on Perry Highway at the end of the day still enjoy the panoramic view of the
glorious Sunsets in the western sky beyond 1-279. Ross was named when the court confirmed
the township line in November 1809. It was named Ross in honor of James Ross, the eminent
attorney of Pittsburgh, just then at the height of his career.
A great deal of information is also available regarding the origins of our school district
itself. The first public elementary school in West View Borough was located at 131 Ridgewood
Avenue in a one-room structure that previously had been the office of the Freehold Real Estate
Company. The school was under the supervision of the Ross Township School Board. Teacher
Elizabeth Boal conducted classes for 39 students in the little building from November 1904 to
April 1905. Her $45 monthly salary included janitorial duties such as tending the two Reznor
stoves that heated the school. With the formation of the new Borough and a school board of its
own, a bond issue was floated for $8,500 to build a school. The Freehold Real Estate Company,
agents for the Allegheny-Bellevue Land Company, presented the Borough with several lots on
Oakwood Avenue. The Oakwood School, a four room brick building, was opened on Monday
evening, October 2, 1905. At first only two rooms were occupied by the teachers, Miss.
Elizabeth Boal and Miss Dunn. A third room was opened in 1906 with Mr. C.D. Coffey as
principal and Mrs. Ella Carroll and Miss Elizabeth Boal as assistants. Early in 1907, Principal
Coffey left and was succeeded by Miss Kittie Spence. In 1918 the Ridgewood School building
was added to the Oakwood School. When it was found necessary to open a school on the East
Bellevue side of the Borough, a suitable room was rented there and about 30 pupils received
instruction from Miss Josephine McGaw. A six room school and auditorium were built of yellow
brick at the corner of Highland and Columbia Avenues. The Highland School was dedicated,
Friday, October 8, 1909. Early in 1912 there was a movement to offer piano and vocal lessons,
manual training and home economics in the schools. Such projects were fostered and pushed by
a group of women who formed the sixty-member Highland Mothers’ Club. On October 21, 1913,
the Home and School Association was formed, and working closely with the county schools,
succeeded in bringing many innovations. Through their efforts, the first summer playground
program in the history of West View was opened at the Highland School in July of 1914. Instead
of paying for the addition of a gymnasium at the Highland School by taxation, the Highland
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 19 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Home and School Association created a special fund and held fundraisers. Through the labor of
the men and women of the Borough, the basement of the school was dug out.
As the Borough grew, the schools became more and more crowded, particularly Highland
School. In March of 1923 the Highland Homes and School Association went on record as
favoring the erection of a junior high school. The students of the Borough were paying tuition to
go to Latimer and Bellevue High schools. This plan came to fruition on April 18, 1925, when
construction began for the new West View Junior High School at the corner of Chalfonte
Avenue and Perry Highway, on the site of the old Donegal Inn. This new junior high school was
one of the first in the country to house grades 7, 8 and 9. After students completed the ninth
grade, the school district paid their tuition to attend high school at Perry, Oliver or Bellevue High
schools. In February 1934, a tenth grade was added and the Junior High then housed grades 7
through 10. On April 1, 1934, a $125,000 bond issue was approved for additions to West View
Junior High School for grades 11 and 12. By August 31, 1937, the addition was completed for
grade 11, and by 1938 classrooms for grade 12 were added. The name of the school was
officially changed to the West View Senior High School in 1938. The first graduating class of
the new West View Senior High School held their graduation exercises for the 120 seniors in
1939. In 1939, plans were drawn up and construction of West View High School Field, off of old
Perry Highway began. The area was leveled for a football field. The Works Progress
Administration started work on the field in 1940, but work was stopped when World War II
began. Construction resumed in 1949. Drawings for the field house were complete and eight
telephone poles were installed for the lights. The field house was completed for the 1950-51
year. The field name was changed from West View High Field to North Hills Field and changed
again in 1968-69 to Martorelli Field for North Hills’ football coach, Mario Martorelli. In 1969,
the district renovated the stadium with new bleachers and an updated track. Fill was added to the
low areas which became the practice and track fields. Significant improvements were made to
the football field again in 2000 through $9.5 million worth of renovations. In 2003, the Field
House was renamed McCurry Field House in honor of football coach and high school principal,
John McCurry.
In 1948, Pennsylvania was moving toward larger, merged school districts. In July, West
View and Ross formed the North Hills School Jointure, with a single system administration and
operation, but two separate school boards. The two school boards meet as an operating board.
Dr. R.S. Rice became Supervising Principal and Mr. Paynter served as assistant. North Hills
Joint Schools was composed of eight elementary schools, the Junior High at Samuel Hamilton
and the West View Senior High. By 1957, enrollment at the senior high had climbed to 917
students, and plans were well under way for the construction of a new high school. A 34-acre
parcel of land known as the Hein Farm became the site for the $2.8 million facility. Shortages in
steel and delays in delivery of construction materials along with labor disputes slowed down
construction. However, by September 8, 1958, the academic sections were completed and
students and staff entered their new building which housed grades 9, 10, 11 and 12. Finishing
touches for the new high school were completed by January 1959, and six days of dedication
activities followed. The new building, sometimes referred to as the Rice building, was dedicated
to Dr. Ralph S. Rice, who had served as supervising principal from 1949-1957. That same year
the high school opened its doors to an Adult Education Program, which attracted 274 participants
who paid a refundable $5 fee for eight-session courses. The most popular classes were sewing
and oil painting. In addition, modern mathematics entered classrooms and even parents were
invited to become schooled in the new math. By 1964, 371 parents throughout the district took
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 20 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
classes in the new math. On July 1, 1965, the North Hills Joint Schools officially ended and was
renamed the North Hills School District and soon thereafter, the need for expansion became
evident. In 1967, ninety-one new professional employees were hired. Enrollment was growing
annually at a rate of 5%, and senior classes were approaching the 900 mark. To accommodate the
enrollment surge, a new North Hills Intermediate High School welcomed 1,600 students in
grades eight and nine from the overcrowded Rice Building in 1972. The Intermediate School was
dedicated to Dr. Victor E. Morrone, Director of Elementary Education and Assistant
Superintendent of Schools.
In 1970, A.W. Beattie Vocational-Technical School on Babcock Boulevard in Ross
Township opened to students in North Hills School District. In 1983, declining enrollment
prompted a consolidation plan. North Hills Intermediate High School was converted into the
North Hills Senior High School, housing grades 10- 12. The old senior high became the junior
high school, housing grades 7-9. Due to declining enrollment, a shift to the establishing a middle
school model in grades 7 and 8 and the availability of space at the high school permitted the
reorganization in 2013 to a 9-12 high school and 7-8 middle school. Both of these buildings are
on the same campus, but separate bussing and classrooms are utilized.
B.2. Description of the School: Official Name of the School North Hills High School
Address of the Main Campus
(street address, city, state, zip
code)
53 Rochester Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15229
Telephone Number of Main
Campus 412-318-1402
Fax Number of Main Campus 412-318-1403
Name and Title of Head of
School John W. Kreider, Principal
E-mail Address of Head of the
School [email protected]
Website Address for the
School www.nhsd.net
Type of Organization X Public
X Not for Profit
X Academic
X Secondary Students
Year School Began Operating 1948
Year of First Graduating Class 1949
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 21 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
State/Agency/Country
Granting License to Operate Pennsylvania Department of Education
Diplomas/Certificates School
is Licensed to Grant
High School Diploma
Calendar Semesters (August-January, January to June)
Currently Accredited by Name of Agency Accredited Until
MSA-CESS Currently seeking
reaccreditation
B.4. SCHOOL INFORMATION: PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Is the school part of a larger school
district, system, or corporation?
Yes No
X
Name of District/System/Corporation: North Hills School District
B.5. SCHOOL INFORMATION: ALL SCHOOLS
B.5.a. Enrollment Trends
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Grades
Included in
This School
PAST PRESENT PROJECTED
BOYS/GIRLS
Two Years
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
One Year
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
This Year
BOYS/GIRLS
Next Year
Grade 9-HS 184 164 200 199 177 177 160 156
Grade 10-HS 195 169 181 166 197 195 177 177
Grade 11-HS 176 145 182 167 182 164 197 195
Grade 12-HS 188 161 190 149 188 164 182 164
TOTALS 743 639 753 681 744 700 716 692
B.5.a.1. Explain any significant or unusual enrollment trends for this school. This data represents a steady decrease in school age children within the district. Student
enrollment data from the 2004-2005 school year shows that 4783 students were enrolled across
grades k-12. This significant drop can be attributed to a large number of “baby boomer” area
residents continuing to reside in their homes but now without children in the district.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 22 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Another significant trend that the school is experiencing is the transferring of students to charter
and cyber schools. When a student transfers to a charter or cyber-school, the funding received by
the district for the student travels with the student. This leads to a significant amount of money
leaving the district without the district having ability to decrease offerings to students because
the changes in enrollment are not centralized in one specific area of the district. Therefore, the
district will still have expenditures for those offerings with less revenue. This has the possibility
of creating potential financial shortfalls.
B.5.b. Student Demographic Trends:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Student Characteristic:
Percent of Student Body
Now
Percent of Student Body
Two Years Ago
African-American 4% 4% Asian 2% 2% Caucasian/White 92% 93% Hispanic 2% 1% Native American Indian 0% 0% TOTAL 100% 100%
Student Characteristic:
Percent of Student Body
Now
Percent of Student Body
Two Years Ago
Economically Disadvantaged 32% 28%
B.5.b.1. Explain any significant or unusual demographic trends for this school. It is important to note that our school district has faced a steady increase in the number of
economically disadvantaged students. During the 2008-2009 school year, 847 students received
free and reduced lunches. Over the past six school years, that number has steadily increased to
1,122 students this year receiving free and reduced lunches. This is an increase in the student
population to 32% who come from an economically disadvantaged household.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 23 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.c. Size of the Professional and Support Staffs:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Full-Time Part-time Total Full-Time
Equivalent
ADMINISTRATIVE
STAFF:
Administrators 24 0 24
INSTRUCTIONAL
STAFF:
Classroom teachers-
elementary/lower
school
131 0 131
Classroom teachers-
middle school 43 0 43
Classroom teachers-
high school/upper
school
95 0 95
Special needs
teachers 28 0 28
STUDENT
SERVICES STAFF:
Guidance/college/
career counselors 14 0 14
Specialists and
consultants 21 1 22
Technology services
personnel 0 0 0
Information
resources/ library
personnel
6 0 6
Health services
personnel 4 0 4
SUPPORT STAFF:
Paraprofessionals
and aides 100.0 0.5 100.5
Secretaries and
clerks 32.0 0 32.0
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 24 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Full-Time Part-time Total Full-Time
Equivalent
Custodial personnel 44.0 1.7 45.7
Maintenance
personnel 12.0 0 12.0
Food services
personnel 0.0 40.0 40.0
Security personnel 3.0 0 3.0
Other: Non-Union 2.0 0 2.0
B.5.c.1. Describe significant trends in size of the staff that have had or may have an
impact on the education program, provision of student services, personnel,
facilities or finances. Declining enrollment and adjustment of educational program offerings based upon effectiveness
and participation have allowed the District to reduce the number of positions in all categories;
various retirement incentives offered over the past few years have allowed the District to reduce
through attrition without furloughing employees.
B.5.d. Experience of the Staff:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 – 2015
Years 0-1 2-5 6-10 11-20 over 20
Administrative
Staff
Women 0 1 2 4 5
Men 1 1 2 5 3
Instructional Staff
Women 22 27 38 63 57
Men 0 6 18 62 14
Student Services
Staff
Women 2 5 2 8 10
Men 0 0 1 4 4
Support Staff
Women 41 38 44 44 14
Men 11 14 11 18 12
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 25 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.d.1. Describe significant trends in experience of the staff that have had or may
have an impact on the education program, provision of student services,
personnel, facilities or finances. The District offered retirement incentives to employee groups which resulted in the retirement of
the most experienced staff; not all vacant positions were filled, and where replacements were
hired, the years of experience of the new hire(s) is significantly less than the years of experience
of the retiree. We expect this trend to continue since 25% of the professional staff currently have
over 20 years of experience and 40% of the professional staff have between 11-20 years of
experience. The support staff demographics reflect that the majority of more experienced
support staff employees have been retiring and it is expected that in the future, the highest
percentage of support staff will have less than 20 years of experience.
B.5.e. Academic Preparation of the Professional Staff:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Associate’s
or No
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
plus
hours
Master’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
plus
hours
Doctorate
Administrative
Staff
Women 1 2 0 4 1 2
Men 1 1 0 6 1 2
Instructional
Staff
Women 0 10 68 85 53 0
Men 0 1 51 28 11 1
Student
Services Staff
Women 0 0 5 15 6 1
Men 0 0 0 5 3 1
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 26 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.e.1. Describe significant trends in the academic preparation of the staff that have
had or may have an impact on the education program, provision of student
services, personnel, facilities or finances. All professional staff are required to possess a minimum of Bachelor’s Degree in order to receive
PA certification; the Level II certification requirements require a certificated individual to
receive 24 credits beyond their Bachelor’s Degree within six years of service time. In addition,
all student services staff are hired with possession of a Master’s Degree at the time of hire.
These requirements will result in the majority of staff possessing a minimum of Bachelor’s + 24
over time.
B.5.f. Professional Certifications of the Professional Staff:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
No
Certificate
Emergency
Certificate
Elementary
Level
Certificate
Middle
Level
Certificate
Secondary
Level
Certificate
Administrative
Certificate
Administrative
Staff
Women 5 0 1 0 2 6
Men 2 0 0 0 2 10
Instructional
Staff
Women 0 0 123 36 58 0
Men 0 0 29 14 47 1
Student
Services Staff
Women 0 0 16 4 8 0
Men 0 0 3 2 3 0
B.5.f.1. Describe significant trends in the professional certification of the staff that
have had or may have an impact on the education program, provision of
student services, personnel, facilities or finances.
All professional staff are properly certificated in their current teaching assignment. Of
note are newly created Math and Literacy Coach positions at the elementary level
which require elementary teaching certification but the role of the Coach is to work with
all elementary teachers regarding math and literacy instruction.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 27 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.g. Staff Demographic Trends:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Race/Ethnicity Percent of Staff in
Current Year
Percent of Staff Two
Years Ago
African-American .009% .009%
Asian --- ---
Caucasian/White 99% 99%
Hispanic --- ---
Native American Indian .001% .001%
TOTAL 100% 100%
B.5.g.1. Describe significant trends in the demographics of the staff that have had or
may have an impact on the education program, provision of student services,
personnel, facilities or finances. The District continues to actively recruit minority candidates for professional and other
positions; however, the job market in Western Pennsylvania currently has a low supply of
certificated minority applicants.
B.5.h. Staff Turnover:
B.5.a. Indicate the percentage of each category below that were new hires (or
assumed a new position within the school) in the year indicated.
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Percent New Hires
Three Years Ago
Percent New Hires
Two Years Ago
Percent New Hires
One Year Ago
Administrative
Staff 5% 12.5% 5%
Instructional Staff 3% 1.5% 4%
Student Services
Staff --- --- 6%
Support Staff 1% 2% 3%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 28 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.h.2 Indicate the percentage of each category below that left the staff or moved
to a new position) in the year indicated.
Percent
Changeover Three
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover Two
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover One
Year Ago
Administrative
Staff 29% 42% 4%
Instructional Staff 3% 3% 4%
Student Services
Staff --- 6% ---
Support Staff 5% 5% 3%
TOTAL 100% 100 100%
B.5.h.3. Describe significant trends in staff turnover that have had or may have an
impact on the education program, provision of student services, personnel,
facilities or finances. Purposeful retirement incentives and other resignations resulted in a higher turnover rate in the
past few years. The District does not intend to offer retirement incentives in the near future, so it
is anticipated that the turnover rate will decrease other than normal retirement age vacancies.
B.5.i. Participation In and Support for the School:
Parents:
X
Exceeds Expectations
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory While parent involvement is generally strong, the perception among stakeholders is that parent
involvement from lower-income households, which is an increasing number in our district, does
not seem to be as high as from families who are not financial struggling.
Community members and organizations
X
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 29 Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Unsatisfactory Our school has very strong partnerships with the local community organizations such as post-
secondary institutions, rotary clubs, VFWs, charities and volunteer organizations, and
governmental agencies. An advisory group for the six different Academies includes
representatives from the regional economic, educational and government community. These
stakeholders may give advice on curriculum, appear as guest speakers in classes, supervise
shadowing and apprenticeship opportunities and serve as mentors for individual students. In
addition, all academies will be articulated to a post-secondary program at a community college,
university, or technical school.
The business community
X
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory Our school has very strong partnerships with the local business community especially via our
Academy programs (http://www.nhsd.net/TheAcademiesatNorthHills.aspx). An advisory group
for the six different Academies includes representatives from the regional economic, educational
and government community. These stakeholders give advice on curriculum, appear as guest
speakers in classes, supervise shadowing and apprenticeship opportunities and serve as mentors
for individual students. In addition, all academies will be articulated to a post-secondary program
at a community college, university, or technical school.
B.5.j. Relationships with Authorities and Agencies:
Evaluate the quality of the school’s relationships with local authorities and government agencies.
X
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Our school has very strong partnerships with the local authorities, especially via our Academy
programs (http://www.nhsd.net/TheAcademiesatNorthHills.aspx). The Advisory Board for the
Academy for Government and Law contains both police chiefs and the local district magistrate.
These stakeholders give advice on curriculum, appear as guest speakers in classes, supervise
shadowing and apprenticeship opportunities and serve as mentors for individual students.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 30 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PROFILE OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE
he Profile of Student Performance includes the following information and data
that describe the levels of student performance on assessments that are most
respected by the members of the school’s community of stakeholders, valued by
the school’s professional staff, and/or required by the state or federal governments. The
Profile includes:
Data for standardized academic assessments.
Data for school-based academic assessments.
Data for achievement indicators such as graduation rate, college rigorous
courses, college acceptance, etc.
Data for citizenship measures such as attendance, promptness, discipline, etc.
Data for state academic assessments, if applicable.
Collecting and tracking data that describe how well the school’s students are
performing in the areas that are normally used by the school’s community of
stakeholders to determine if the school is accomplishing its mission is important for the
following reasons:
The school needs these data to determine if it is making progress toward
achieving its mission;
The school needs these data to determine if its graduates are meeting the
expectations expressed in the school’s Profile of Graduates;
The school needs these data to help it determine in which areas of student
performance there are the largest gaps between what is expected and how
student are performing and, therefore, what the focus of the school’s Plan for
Growth and Improvement should be.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 31 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE DATA—PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
We are not subject to the provisions of the No child Left Behind Act.
A.1. Results of State Academic Assessments:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance1
Keystone Exam – Algebra I
All 9-11
17.1 Advanced
26.8 Proficient
43.1 Basic
13.0 Below Basic
Caucasian
9-11 18 Advanced
26.9 Proficient
43.3 Basic
11.8 Below Basic
African-
American
9-11 0 Advanced
19.0 Proficient
57.1 Basic
23.8 Below Basic
Hispanic
9-11 22.2 Advanced
44.4 Proficient
11.1 Basic
22.2 Below Basic
Male
9-11 14.3 Advanced
24.0 Proficient
45.0 Basic
16.7 Below Basic
Female
9-11 20.3 Advanced
30.0 Proficient
41.0 Basic
8.8 Below Basic
1 Insert the names of the appropriate terms used to designate levels of performance on this assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 32 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance1
IEP
9-11 17.1 Advanced
4.8 Proficient
57.1 Basic
36.2 Below Basic
English
Language
Learners
9-11 11.1 Advanced
0.0 Proficient
22.2 Basic
66.7 Below Basic
Socially-
Economically
Deprived
9-11 10.3 Advanced
19.0 Proficient
52.9 Basic
17.8 Below Basic
School’s Performance on This Assessment:
X
X Made AYP
Did not make AYP
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance2
Keystone Exam – Biology
All
9-11 12.3 Advanced
20.1 Proficient
45.0 Basic
22.6 Below Basic
Caucasian
9-11 12.2 Advanced
19.7 Proficient
46.8 Basic
21.2 Below Basic
African-
American
9-11 4.2 Advanced
33.3 Proficient
16.7 Basic
45.8 Below Basic
2 Insert the names of the appropriate terms used to designate levels of performance on this assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 33 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance2
Hispanic
9-11 28.6 Advanced
14.3 Proficient
14.3 Basic
42.9 Below Basic
Male
9-11 11.2 Advanced
15.4 Proficient
47.4 Basic
26.0 Below Basic
Female
9-11 13.6 Advanced
25.6 Proficient
42.1 Basic
18.6 Below Basic
IEP
9-11 2.8 Advanced
3.8 Proficient
36.8 Basic
56.6 Below Basic
English
Language
Learners
9-11 12.5 Advanced
0.0 Proficient
12.5 Basic
75.0 Below Basic
Socially-
Economically
Deprived
9-11 6.9 Advanced
20.7 Proficient
41.4 Basic
31.0 Below Basic
School’s Performance on This Assessment:
X
X Made AYP
Did not make AYP
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 34 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance3
Keystone Exam –
Literature
All
9-11 4.0 Advanced
48.3 Proficient
37.1 Basic
10.6 Below Basic
Caucasian
9-11 4.5 Advanced
49.7 Proficient
35.7 Basic
10.2 Below Basic
African-
American
9-11 0.0 Advanced
33.3 Proficient
55.6 Basic
11.1 Below Basic
Hispanic
9-11 0.0 Advanced
40.0 Proficient
40.0 Basic
20.0 Below Basic
Male
9-11 2.5 Advanced
43.2 Proficient
38.7 Basic
15.6 Below Basic
Female
9-11 6.0 Advanced
55.0 Proficient
34.9 Basic
4.0 Below Basic
IEP
9-11 0.0 Advanced
15.2 Proficient
48.5 Basic
36.4 Below Basic
English
Language
Learners
9-11 0.0 Advanced
0.0 Proficient
25.0 Basic
75.0 Below Basic
Socially- 9-11 2.7 Advanced
3 Insert the names of the appropriate terms used to designate levels of performance on this assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 35 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance3
Economically
Disadvantaged
31.9 Proficient
49.6 Basic
15.9 Below Basic
School’s Performance on This Assessment:
X
X Made AYP
Did not make AYP
A.2. STATUS OF SCHOOL RE: MEETING NCLB REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Made AYP X
Making Progress
Warning
School Improvement I
School Improvement II
Corrective Action I
Corrective Action II
Other (Specify):
A.2.a. If the school did not make AYP, provide a description of the actions the school
is required to take in response to its status. N/A
A.2.b. Describe the next action that will be taken if the school does not meet AYP in
the next academic year.
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 36 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE DATA—ALL SCHOOLS
B.1. Results of Standardized Academic Assessments:
Our school utilizes the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams (above) as the
standardized assessment for our students.
B.2. Retention in Grade: *
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Retained in
Grade
9
All 0%
Caucasian 0%
African-American 0%
Hispanic 0%
Male 0%
Female 0%
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Retained in
Grade
10
All 0%
Caucasian 0%
African-American 0%
Hispanic 0%
Male 0%
Female 0%
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 37 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Retained in
Grade
11
All 0%
Caucasian 0%
African-American 0%
Hispanic 0%
Male 0%
Female 0%
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Retained in
Grade
12
All 1%
Caucasian 1%
African-American 0%
Hispanic 0%
Male 1%
Female 0%
*The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Education has established a cohort system
for each graduating class. Students are automatically promoted now despite credit indicators
being the measurement of progress towards graduation and grade promotion. Therefore, students
are not retained until they reach 12th
grade.
B.3. Honor Roll:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students % Honor Roll
9
All 59%
Caucasian 50%
African-American 20%
Hispanic 33%
Male 33%
Female 36%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 38 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students % Honor Roll
10
All 48%
Caucasian 51%
African-American 25%
Hispanic 40%
Male 37%
Female 33%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students % Honor Roll
11
All 50%
Caucasian 47%
African-American 50%
Hispanic 40%
Male 37%
Female 25%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students % Honor Roll
12
All 59%
Caucasian 50%
African-American 20%
Hispanic N/A
Male 33%
Female 39%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 39 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.4. GRADE POINT AVERAGE:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Average GPA
9
All 3.24
Caucasian 3.31
African-American 2.80
Hispanic N/A
Male 3.36
Female 3.12
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Average GPA
10
All 3.31
Caucasian 3.35
African-American 3.15
Hispanic 3.25
Male 3.35
Female 3.27
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Average GPA
11
All 3.39
Caucasian 3.43
African-American 2.75
Hispanic 3.50
Male 3.37
Female 3.41
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 40 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Average GPA
12
All 3.24
Caucasian 3.31
African-American 2.80
Hispanic N/A
Male 3.36
Female 3.12
C. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE DATA: FOR ALL
DIPLOMA GRANTING HIGH SCHOOLS
C.1. Honors Course Enrollment and Performance:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Enrolled in
Honors Course
9
All 48%
Caucasian 53%
African-American 50%
Hispanic 25%
Male 45%
Female 54%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Enrolled in
Honors Course
10
All 55%
Caucasian 57%
African-American 50%
Hispanic 25%
Male 53%
Female 57%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 41 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Enrolled in
Honors Course
11
All 52%
Caucasian 54%
African-American 33%
Hispanic 25%
Male 46%
Female 51%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Enrolled in
Honors Course
12
All 53%
Caucasian 57%
African-American 25%
Hispanic N/A
Male 53%
Female 57%
C.2. Advanced Placement® Course Enrollment:
Our school does not participate in the Advanced Placement® Program.
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
All students enrolled in an AP exam at North Hills High School must take the AP exam in order
to participate in the course. Our high school covers all test costs and fees. Please see the reports
below for the number of participants in each course.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 42 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 43 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 44 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.3. Advanced Placement® Examination Performance:
Our school does not participate in the Advanced Placement® Program.
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 45 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 46 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 47 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.4. International Baccalaureate Program Participation: X Our school does not participate in the International Baccalaureate Program.
C.5. International Baccalaureate Program Performance: X Our school does not participate in the International Baccalaureate Program.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 48 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.6. Graduation Rate:
FOR CLASS OF: 2014
Sub-Group of Students Percentage Graduating
Within Four Years*
All 92%
Caucasian 94%
African-American 90%
Hispanic 75%
Male 90%
Female 94% *Please note that in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, any student not graduating in four
years with their cohort is counted as a “dropout.” This is not only misleading but a disservice to
students who by law need to be provided with services until they are 21 years old. This includes
students with cognitive difficulties that require additional education until they are 21 and
students who may need additional vocational education per their IEP team.
C.7. Graduate Intentions:
FOR THE CLASS OF: 2014
Intentions Percent of Total
Senior Class
Attend 4 year college or university 64%
Attend junior or community college 24%
Attend another post-secondary,
technical school or business college 3%
Enter military service 1%
Undecided 1%
TOTAL 100%
C.7.a. List the colleges, universities, and/or post-secondary schools where graduates
of the last two graduating classes were accepted for matriculation most frequently.
Community College of Allegheny County 79
Penn State, branch campus 18
Penn State, University Park 18
Slippery Rock University 15
University of Pittsburgh, Oakland campus 14
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 49 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Robert Morris University 13
Duquesne University 12
University of Pittsburgh, branch campus 8
California University of PA 7
LaRoche College 7
Edinboro University of PA 4
Indiana University of PA 4
Waynesburg University 4
Clarion U of PA 3
Kent State University 3
West Virginia University 3
Carlow University 2
Carnegie-Mellon University 2
John Carroll University 2
Mercyhurst University 2
Ohio State University 2
Ohio University 2
Point Park University 2
St. Vincent College 2
Syracuse University 2
Thiel College 2
Westminster College 2
Youngstown State University 2
Kaplan School 1
Minneapolis Community Technical
College 1
Pittsburgh Technical Institute 1
Steamfitters Union 1
Vet Tech Institute 1
Allegheny College 1
Chatham University 1
Embry Riddle 1
Franciscan University of Steubenville 1
Geneva College 1
Grove City College 1
Juniata College 1
Laboratory Institute of
Merchandising(LIM) 1
Lackawanna College 1
Liberty University 1
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 50 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Lock Haven 1
Messiah College 1
Michigan State University 1
Muskingum University 1
North Carolina State University 1
Northeastern University 1
Northwestern University 1
Pacific Northwest Ballet Company 1
Purdue University 1
Southern Adventist University 1
St. Francis University 1
Truman State University 1
University of Akron 1
University of Arizona 1
University of Findlay 1
Washington & Jefferson College 1
Bradford School
D. CITIZENSHIP PERFORMANCE DATA—ALL SCHOOLS
D.1. Attendance:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage UNEXCUSED
Absent 10 or More Days4
9
All 10%
Caucasian 11%
African-American 8%
Hispanic 10%
Male 12%
Female 8%
4 The school may change this standard to meet the generally accepted standard for the school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 51 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage UNEXCUSED
Absent 10 or More Days5
10
All 8%
Caucasian 9%
African-American 5%
Hispanic 5%
Male 9%
Female 7%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage UNEXCUSED
Absent 10 or More Days6
11
All 10%
Caucasian 11%
African-American 8%
Hispanic N/A
Male 12%
Female 8%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage UNEXCUSED
Absent 10 or More Days7
12
All 9%
Caucasian 10%
African-American 8%
Hispanic 5%
Male 7%
Female 8%
5 The school may change this standard to meet the generally accepted standard for the school.
6 The school may change this standard to meet the generally accepted standard for the school.
7 The school may change this standard to meet the generally accepted standard for the school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 52 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
91% 91%
9% 9%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2012-2013 2013-2014 Baseline
Per
cen
t
Year
Absences
Students with >= 10Unexcused Absences
Students with <10Unexcused Absences
D.2. Tardiness:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students
Percentage Late to School
10 or More Days
9
All 10%
Caucasian 11%
African-American 8%
Hispanic 10%
Male 12%
Female 8%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students
Percentage Late to School
10 or More Days
10
All 8%
Caucasian 9%
African-American 5%
Hispanic 5%
Male 9%
Female 7%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 53 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students
Percentage Late to School
10 or More Days
11
All 10%
Caucasian 11%
African-American 8%
Hispanic N/A
Male 12%
Female 8%
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students
Percentage Late to School
10 or More Days
12
All 9%
Caucasian 10%
African-American 8%
Hispanic 5%
Male 7%
Female 8%
D.3. Suspensions from School:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Suspended
One or More Times
9
All 2.79 %
Caucasian 2.554 %
African-American .254 %
Hispanic 0 %
Male 2.290 %
Female .508 %
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 54 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Suspended
One or More Times
10
All 4.829 %
Caucasian 4.829 %
African-American 0 %
Hispanic 0 %
Male 3.409 %
Female 1.420 %
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Suspended
One or More Times
11
All 3.409 %
Caucasian 3.125 %
African-American .284 %
Hispanic 0 %
Male 2.556 %
Female .8522 %
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Suspended
One or More Times
12
All 2.719 %
Caucasian 2.114 %
African-American .604 %
Hispanic 0 %
Male 2.114 %
Female .604 %
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 55 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D.4. Expulsions:
No students were expelled from the North Hills High School last year.
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Expelled
Grades 9-12
All 0%
Caucasian 0%
African-American 0%
Hispanic 0%
Male 0%
Female 0%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 56 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE SCHOOL’S MISSION,
BELIEFS, AND PROFILE OF GRADUATES
A. MISSION
What is the school’s Mission? The mission of the North Hills School District is to excel at educating and preparing each student
to become a responsible, contributing member of society by providing a caring and academically
challenging environment.
The mission, vision, and beliefs are formally published on our district website under the “About”
tab at www.nhsd.net. It is also published in nearly every important district and high school
publication.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Mission? Summer, 2005 – North Hills School District’s current philosophy, mission, and core values were
created by district administration and approved by the North Hills Board of Directors.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Mission. August, 2013 – The North Hills faculty begins to meet regarding the MSA “Excellence By
Design” process. This begins with an examination of the current philosophy, mission, and core
values.
August and September, 2014 – As part of the MSA “Excellence By Design” self-study, the
North Hills MSA stakeholders (faculty, students, and community) were surveyed via Google
Doc. The overwhelming consensus was that the North Hills School District’s current philosophy,
mission, and core values remain relevant and appropriate for continued use through the year
2022. The Google Doc used to collect this information is part of this document (see below).
Stakeholders Number of Mission/Vision/Profile survey responses
Parents 52
Faculty 109
Students 68
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 57 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. BELIEFS What are the school’s Beliefs? North Hills Nine Core Values
1. Demonstrate genuine care, concern, and fondness for students.
2. Adopt a client-centered focus - students come first, followed closely by the needs of their
parents.
3. Develop and nurture healthy, productive and cooperative relationships with colleagues.
4. Communicate regularly and clearly with clients, their families and the community.
5. Demand quality - high expectations will yield high achievement.
6. Create and cultivate a districtwide Learning Community.
7. Benchmark programs, services, and students' results against the best.
8. Encourage innovation and risk-taking.
9. Establish community and regional partnerships.
The mission, vision, and beliefs are formally published on our district website under the “About”
tab at www.nhsd.net. It is also published in nearly every important district and high school
publication.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Beliefs? Summer, 2005 – North Hills School District’s current philosophy, mission, and core values were
created by district administration and approved by the North Hills Board of Directors.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Beliefs. August, 2013 – The North Hills faculty begins to meet regarding the MSA “Excellence By
Design” process. This begins with an examination of the current philosophy, mission, and core
values.
August and September, 2014 – As part of the MSA “Excellence By Design” self-study, the
North Hills MSA stakeholders (faculty, students, and community) were surveyed via Google
Doc. The overwhelming consensus was that the North Hills School District’s current philosophy,
mission, and core values remain relevant and appropriate for continued use through the year
2022. The Google Doc used to collect this information is part of this document (see below). The
survey was completed by:
Stakeholders Number of Mission/Vision/Profile survey responses
Parents 52
Faculty 109
Students 68
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 58 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 59 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 60 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 61 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. PROFILE OF GRADUATES
What is the school’s Profile of Graduates? North Hills High School graduates are the product of a dynamic learning community that is
devoted to the attainment of knowledge, skills, and understanding. North Hills’ graduates are
notable for:
thinking critically
communicating effectively
employing problem-solving processes
exhibiting tolerance, empathy, and respect
seeking self-improvement
embracing their role in a changing world
appreciating learning as a lifetime endeavor.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Profile of Graduates? August and September, 2014 – As part of the MSA “Excellence By Design” self-study, the
North Hills MSA stakeholders (faculty, students, and community) were surveyed via Google
Doc. The overwhelming consensus was that the North Hills School District’s current philosophy,
mission, and core values remain relevant and appropriate for continued use through the year
2022. At this time, the Planning Team was formed. One of their first goals was to review and
discuss the results of the discussions on Google Form comments that had been collected. It was
determined that our Profile of Graduates should contain elements of the “hidden curriculum” of
skills and qualities that our graduates also acquire over the course of their time as our students.
Next, the Planning Team narrowed down these skills and qualities to develop the aforementioned
Profile of Graduates.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Profile of Graduates. These skills and qualities were discussed frankly and openly within the Planning Committee in
respect to our mission, vision, and core values. Each of the comments that were submitted by the
stakeholders were considered and debated. Each stakeholder on the Planning Team contributed
to the discussion related to this Phase of the EBD process (which lasted several months and
many meetings during August-October, 2015) in some way and the decision was made via
consensus that our Profile of Graduates was indeed an affirmation of the experiences that each
graduate of North Hills High School undergoes during their enrollment in our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 62 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PROFILE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY
he Profile of Organizational Capacity provides information and data that portray
the school’s capacity to produce the levels of student performance the school and
its community of stakeholders desire and expect. The Profile consists of the
results of a self-assessment of the school’s adherence to the Middle States Standards for
Accreditation.
The twelve Standards for Accreditation reflect research-based best practices for quality
in schools. The Standards also represent the organizational “building blocks” that need
to be in place to produce high levels of student performance. The self-assessment leads
to identifying the school’s strengths and areas in need of improvement.
The Profile also provides those responsible for developing the school’s Plan for Growth
and Improvement with a good understanding of the current status of the school.
Standards for Accreditation for Schools: Elementary, Middle, High, and
PreK-12 Institutions
Foundational Standards: Standards addressing best practices in the components of a
school that provide the foundations for quality in the education program, services,
and results in terms of student learning.
Standard 1: Philosophy/Mission
Standard 2: Governance and Leadership
Standard 3: School Improvement Planning
Standard 4: Finances
Standard 5: Facilities
Standard 6: School Climate and Organization
Operational Standards: Standards addressing best practices in delivering the
education program, services, and activities to the students.
Standard 7: Health and Safety
Standard 8: Educational Program
Standard 9: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Standard 10: Student Services
Standard 11: Student Life and Student Activities
Standard 12: Information Resources and Technology
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 63 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Method(s) Used to Conduct the Self-Assessment of Adherence to the
Standards for Accreditation Electronic methods of gathering data on the 12 Standards were developed for ease of data
analysis and in order to gather survey data from as many different stakeholders as possible. Not
every stakeholder who had expressed interest in being a member of Standard Committee was
able to attend the schedule meetings, but the Google Doc electronic survey form allowed these
parents, students, and community members to contribute their thoughts and experiences to the
discussion for that Standard. Anyone who submitted a response in this electronic format was
invited to attend the live Standard discussions as well.
The gather of data regarding these standards occurred during October and November of 2014.
Surveys were first emailed to all North Hills Students with a link to the Google Doc survey. This
email to students included a notice that students who complete this survey would be entered into
a drawing for prizes (namely, parking in Mr. McGahee’s parking spot for a whole week!). The
morning announcements at our school also promoted this process during this time period. The
North Hills website and weekly e-link email blasts also included this link so that parents and
community members also had the opportunity to provide responses over a 6 week period.
All stakeholders were invited to an entire day of meeting regarding the 12 Standards on
November 4, 2014. At this event, the North Hills High School faculty members asked to choose
one of the twelve standards committees and an entire professional development day was
dedicated to examining the survey submissions and discussing how we might be meeting that
particular Standard. Standard meeting chairs were selected by a request for volunteers with
respect given to stakeholders with specific knowledge or responsibility for an area related to a
standard. Survey results and comments were collected using a Google Doc Form that allowed
for specific comments.
Surveys were distributed via email and the internet, collected, and then evaluated by the Internal
Coordinators and the Planning Team. The results were distributed back to Standards Committee
Chairs, including any comments were submitted. All stakeholders were invited to an entire day
of meetings regarding the 12 Standards on November 4, 2014. A second in-person gathering of
the Standards Review Teams was held on December 3, 2014.
Standard Chair(s) of the Self-Assessment Group
#1 Ryan Yates and Alice Kilroy
#2 Johannah Vanatta and Amy Patsilevas
#3 Jennifer DiPasquale
#4 David Hall and Chris Cummings
#5 Kevin Swindell and Mike Scarpaci
#6 John Kreider
#7 Tim McDowell and Joan Kinder
#8 Jaime Deweese
#9 Bill McGahee
#10 Nicole Bezlia and Deborah Davis
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 64 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
#11 Sue Batson
#12 David Charles and Sandy Miller
Standards Review Process
Standard chairs were selected by a request for volunteers with respect given to stakeholders with
specific knowledge or responsibility for an area related to a standard. Their responsibility was to
tally the survey results that had been electronically submitted to date, read and identify key
comments from these completed surveys, and compile them for review at a Standard meeting.
They also took the lead with the in-person group discussions on occurred on November 4, 2014,
an entire day that was devoted to reviewing the Standards in context of the previously discussed
Mission, Beliefs, and Profile of the School.
All stakeholders were invited to an entire day of meetings regarding the 12 Standards on
November 4, 2014. Each was provided with the previously discussed Mission, Beliefs, and
Profile of the School. All faculty members were asked to choose one of the twelve standards
committees. After breaking into small group in classrooms to discuss the 12 standards, each
group was asked to consider recommendations for possible student performance objectives based
on this data. These suggestions were projected via a PowerPoint presentation during the
professional development day on November 4 to all of the present stakeholders. The rest of the
faculty, both building and central administration members, and members of the Planning Team
were in attendance. The presentations given that day were conducted by the Internal
Coordinators.
The survey results received were from a variety of stakeholder groups. All faculty
members were responsible for taking at least one twelve standards survey, as well as the building
principals and associated central administrators. The results were tabulated by the Internal
Coordinators. Written comments were included as well. The relationship of the MSA Standards
to the high school mission and beliefs, the strategic plan, the EBD objectives and action plans are
described below.
A second in-person gathering of the Standards Review Teams was held on December 3,
2014. This meeting was held after school in order to involve a variety of stakeholders. At this
meeting, the Standards Review Teams reviewed the prepared Standards reports and reached a
consensus of agreement with its contents.
The relationship of the MSA Standards to the high school mission, beliefs, and Profile of
Graduates, and the EBD self-study are described below the survey data information.
A. By Standards Surveys
X YES X NO The self-assessment was conducted using the surveys
provided by the Middle States Association.
The MSA Standards survey was used during all committee meetings and as the means to create
the Standards report. However, an additional alternate survey was used to collect data from
stakeholders who may not be as familiar with the process. This data was used both during and
after the several Standards committee meetings. Feedback is indicated under each individual
Standard report. The survey is below:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 65 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. By a Committee
X YES NO The self-assessment was conducted by a committee
for all the Standards.
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher, parent,
student, etc.)
Please see each of the
standards sections below for
the committee member.
Please see the standards sections below for the
committee member’s roles.
**NOTE: Committee size and composition may vary depending upon the school’s size, the
topic to be addressed, etc. If needed, add lines to the above chart.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 66 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PHILOSOPHY/MISSION STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. List the people who participated in the most recent development/review of the
philosophy/mission and the stakeholder group each participant represents.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Jason Hillegas, faculty member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Ryan Yates, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Alice Kilroy, community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Mark Timko, faculty member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
A.2. List the date(s) of the most recent revision/adoption of the school's
philosophy/mission.
Summer, 2005 – North Hills School District’s current philosophy, mission, and core
values were created by district administration and approved by the Board of Directors.
August, 2013 – The North Hills faculty begins to meet regarding the MSA “Excellence
By Design” process. This begins with an examination of the current philosophy, mission,
and core values.
August and September, 2014 – As part of the MSA “Excellence By Design” self-study,
the North Hills MSA stakeholders (faculty, students, and community) were surveyed via
Google Doc. The overwhelming consensus was that the North Hills School District’s
current philosophy, mission, and core values remain relevant and appropriate for
continued use through the year 2022.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 67 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3. By what body was the most recent revision/adoption of the school's
philosophy/mission approved>
Summer, 2005 – North Hills School District’s current philosophy, mission, and core
values were created by district administration and approved by the Board of Directors.
August, 2013 – The North Hills faculty begins to meet regarding the MSA “Excellence
By Design” process. This begins with an examination of the current philosophy, mission,
and core values.
August and September, 2014 – As part of the MSA “Excellence By Design” self-study,
the North Hills MSA stakeholders (faculty, students, and community) were surveyed via
Google Doc. The overwhelming consensus was that the North Hills School District’s
current philosophy, mission, and core values remain relevant and appropriate for
continued use through the year 2022.
A.4. Indicate where the philosophy/mission is formally published. The mission and vision statements are formally published on our district website under the
“About” tab at www.nhsd.net. It is also published in nearly every important district and high
school publication.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school does not meet the
expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school partially meets the
expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school meets the expectations
of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school exceeds the expectations
of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 68 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 1:
Philosophy/Mission
The Standard: The school has a clearly written and actively implemented statement
of philosophy/mission that conveys the general and specific purposes of its educational
program, expresses expectations for quality, and serves as the basis for daily
operational and instructional decision making as well as long-range planning.
Stakeholders give input into the development of the school’s philosophy/mission and
understand and accept it. This document is aligned with the community served and is
reviewed periodically by stakeholder representatives.
1.1. – 1.5: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
1.1 The school takes steps to ensure that students and
their families understand and support the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
1.2 The philosophy/mission is free of contradiction,
ambiguity, and excessive abstraction. X
1.3 The philosophy/mission is consistent with ethical
norms and demonstrates respect for persons of all
races, creeds, and cultures.
X
1.4 The school implements a system to assess its
effectiveness in fulfilling its philosophy/mission. X
1.5 The school’s philosophy/mission is clearly
communicated in its brochures, promotional
materials, policy and procedural handbooks, web
site, and similar resources.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Unified with entire district; clear; near unanimous agreement from faculty
Technology allows access for community members for just about every activity or
upcoming event, academics,
High school principals are on the same page with parents/community involvement and do
a nice job notifying families
Our strength is in the use of these for the students.
Communications are used to convey this objective.
All stakeholders were involved in the process of creating these.
The information is readily accessible for all.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 69 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
I haven’t seen the mission statement and philosophy for a few years.
The school states a zero tolerance policy on bullying but my daughter was bullied.
The mission statement is well-written and available.
C. Root Cause Analysis
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Philosophy/Mission
Are there philosophy/mission
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Philosophy/Mission
Standard. The School Board of Directors, Central Administration, faculty, students, and community
understand that these serve as the foundation of all of our district’s initiatives and
programs.
The philosophy, mission and core values address the needs of all parties to whom it
pertains.
The philosophy, mission and core values detail specific expectations and outcomes for
students, teachers, and administration.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 70 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The philosophy, mission and core values describe expectations for the aforementioned
parties whilst and after enrollment in the district.
The school has a defined Philosophy/ Mission statement that is formally published in
nearly every major publication.
The results indicate found there in strength is in the ethical aspects of the mission, vision,
and core values as well as respect for all student groups.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Philosophy/Mission Standard.
Student and parental awareness of the mission, vision, and core values was found to be
somewhat lower than hoped for. The committee believes that this can be attributed to
hectic nature of parenting and teenage life. Considering the “why” that make up the
larger principles of a high school are not as much as a priority as the “what” needs to be
done on an everyday basis such as getting to class on time, driving to activities, and
completing homework.
More outside input was hoped for by invited stakeholders.
The philosophy, mission and core values lack routine review and revision.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Philosophy/Mission that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement. Plans are underway to better display these in the school building. Suggestions include
giving teachers laminated copies of the mission to display in their classrooms, displaying
the mission first during the morning announcements, and having teachers are devising a
way to incorporate the mission, vision, and core values into a lessons on principles,
ethics, and standards. While actionable, may not rise to the level of being part of the
action plan.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
The school’s philosophy/mission X
Samples of publications that communicate the mission/philosophy to the
school’s community of stakeholders X
Marketing, recruitment, and admissions materials X
Address of the school’s website X
Policies related to the philosophy/mission X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 71 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation.
TO BE COMPLETED BY INDEPENDENT, RELIGIOUS, AND
PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS
1. Is the school incorporated? N/A Yes
No
If yes, Name of Corporation: N/A
2. Is the school licensed to operate as an
educational school?
N/A Yes
N/A No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
operate?
N/A
In what country(ies) is the school
licensed to operate?
N/A
If no, explain the school’s authority to
operate:
N/A
3. Is the school licensed to grant
diplomas or certificates?
N/A Yes
N/A No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
grant diplomas or certificates?
N/A
Type(s) of diplomas or certificates
offered
N/A
If no, explain the school’s authority to
grant diplomas or certificates:
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 72 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
For religious schools:
Religious Affiliation: N/A
TO BE COMPLETED BY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1. Is the school part of a larger school
system or corporation?
X Yes
No
If yes, Name of System/Corporation: North Hills School District
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school does not meet the
expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school partially meets the
expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school meets the expectations
of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school exceeds the expectations
of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 73 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 2:
Governance and Leadership
The Standard: The school is chartered, licensed, or authorized by a state, nation, or
authority that operates in the public interest. The governance and leadership ensure the
integrity, effectiveness, and reputation of the school through the establishment of
policy, provision of resources, and assurance of a quality educational program. The
governance and leadership act ethically and consistently to assure an atmosphere of
mutual respect and purposeful effort on behalf of students and their learning. School
leaders foster a productive environment for teaching and learning, timely and open
communication with stakeholders, and the vision necessary for day-to-day operations
and long-term planning.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Johannah Vanatta, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jenna Kunselman, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Erin Traynor, community member and faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Peggy Byrnes, parent and faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Amy Patsilevas, parent and faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Carmen Washington, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
John Curran, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Fred Ebert, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Sue Biskup, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jennifer Sturges, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
2.1 – 2.17: Indicators for schools that are not part of a public school
district, archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other
school organization with a central office staff
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
2.18 – 2.38: Indicators for schools that are part of a public school district,
archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other school
organization with a central office staff
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 74 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Governance
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.18 The school is in compliance with all applicable
statutes, ordinances, and regulations of all civil
authorities of the jurisdiction in which the school
is located.
X
2.19 No legal or proprietary ambiguities in ownership,
control, or responsibility exist. Partnerships and
any corporate linkages in ownership/governance
are expressed as enforceable agreements.
X
2.20 The governance works cooperatively to establish
and maintain clearly formulated written policies
and procedures that are consistent with the
school’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed
regularly.
X
2.21 The governance provides appropriate
opportunities for education of the trustees/board,
including orientation and training sessions so that
all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
X
2.22 The governance appropriately recognizes the
accomplishments of the staff and students. X
2.23 The governance provides the school with effective
leadership, support, and continuity, including
succession planning to ensure stability of the
school leadership.
X
2.24 The governance thinks and acts strategically,
reflecting on its decisions and the consequences of
its actions.
X
2.25 The governance implements a system for
evaluating its own effectiveness in performing its
duties.
X
2.26 The governance focuses its activities on selecting,
evaluating, and supporting the head of the school
system, policy development, planning, assessing
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 75 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
the organization’s performance, and ensuring
adequate resources to accomplish the
organization’s philosophy/mission.
2.27 Governance refrains from undermining the
authority of the leadership to conduct the daily
operation of the school system.
X
2.28 The governance utilizes a clearly defined
performance appraisal system for the head of the
school system. The appraisal is conducted with
the knowledge and participation of the head of
the organization.
X
Central Office Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.29 The head of the school system is accountable to
the governance and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.30 The central office leadership ensures that all
school system programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
X
2.31 The central office leadership stays well informed
of educational developments. X
2.32 The central office leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning confidentiality
in communications.
X
School Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.33 The school leadership maintains appropriate and
constructive relations with families, students,
staff, the community, and with each other in the
interest of serving the needs of the students.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 76 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.34 The school leadership undertakes operational,
long range, and strategic planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.35 The head of the school is accountable to the
governance and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.36 The school leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and
appropriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.37 The school leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed
of educational developments.
X
2.38 The school leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
2.39: Indicator for schools that provide distance education.
This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.39 The school’s leadership includes personnel with
expertise in distance education methodologies. X
2.40– 2.47: Indicators for faith-based schools8
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 77 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Building leaders verbalize appreciation for teachers and staff
Monthly faculty meetings are a positive
Periodic building staff appreciation events are appreciated.
Central and building administrators have high visibility and approachability
The school is too involved with a student’s personal issues.
Some inconsistent treatment of students observed at the Central Admin level
Communication is good-especially via the web-page
Central and building administration has the knowledge and ambition to lead our district
to the next level
Sometimes board members and central administrators have their own agendas
Strong secondary principal leadership
As a teacher in another district, I see the administration more than my own family.
Administration have been accessible and helpful
B.2. Evidence: Results indicate that the school exceeds the minimum rating.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Governance and Leadership
Are there governance and
leadership standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 78 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Governance and
Leadership Standard. It appears that the High School is fortunate enough to have strong secondary leadership
and an administration that is highly visible.
Because the school has increased its use of technology, it is able to better maintain an
open communication with the stakeholders.
Central administration and building principals remain current on educational issues.
Central administration and building principals keep open communication with the
building principals.
Central administration and building principals uses strategic planning to reach long term
goals
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Governance and Leadership Standard. Inconsistency with policy enforcement is sometimes reported between building and
central administration when dealing with parents, students, and the community.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Governance and
Leadership that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement. Consistency and clarity of enforcement of school policies could empower parents,
faculty, and administrators with the knowledge regarding the likely reactions to
violations. This could contribute to higher attendance and graduation rates as the
expectations are clearly set. While notable, this may not rise to the level of being part of
the action plan.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Job descriptions for the head of the institution and other key administrative
personnel X
Appraisal tool and/or description of the process used to appraise the
performance of the head of the institution X
Chart of lines of authority/responsibilities X
Policies related to governance and leadership X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 79 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SCHOOL PLANS
Type of Plan Yes/No
Year Last
Reviewed/
Updated
Quality/Effectiveness
of Plan
Strategic Plan/Long-Range
Plan
X 2014
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Financial Plan X 2014
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Facilities Plan X 2014
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Technology Plan X 2014
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Professional Development
Plan X 2014
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Staffing Plan
X 2014
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Institutional Advancement
and Development Plan X 2014
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 80 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Plan Yes/No
Year Last
Reviewed/
Updated
Quality/Effectiveness
of Plan
Unsatisfactory
Curriculum
Review/Revision Plan X 2014
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Staffing Plan X 2014
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Student Enrollment Plan X 2014
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 81 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 3:
School Improvement Planning
The Standard: The school uses a collaborative process to develop and implement a
written strategic or long-range plan to improve its educational program and services.
Plans are aligned with the school’s philosophy/mission and its operational plans, and
are focused on continuous improvement of student performance, staff professional and
organizational growth.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Jennifer Dipasquale, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Danielle Galbraith, student Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Amy Kane, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Rachel Owens, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Ryan Graziani, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Mark Franks, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Patrick Clark, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kim Wroblewski, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jen Staudt, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Debra Everhart Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
3.1– 3.8: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.1 The school’s improvement plans are developed
with broad-based school community participation
and input.
X
3.2 Information about the school’s planning
processes, its improvement plans and goals, and
the results of implementing the improvement
plans are communicated to stakeholders and the
public.
X
3.3 Improvement plans are supported by the school
community and approved by the governance
where appropriate.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 82 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.4 Periodic external reviews validate the school’s
processes for strategic or long-range planning and
school improvement.
X
3.5 The school can document its long-range planning
for finances, facilities, and technology
enhancement.
X
3.6 Improvement plans are based on an analysis of
historical data, baseline performance information,
trend data, and projections.
X
3.7 The school’s improvement plans are reviewed
periodically to determine the extent to which
outcomes meet expectations so that corrective
actions can be taken as needed.
X
3.8 Planners consider the capacities of its facilities,
equipment, and staff before adopting new
programs.
X
3.9: Indicator for faith-based schools9 X This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
School has good communication methods (Twitter, text, etc.).
Consensus that our school is moving in a positive direction.
Not having homeroom has caused more problems than solved.
Moving the ninth grade into the high school seems to be a positive change.
Changed the bell schedule seems to have maximize instructional time.
Change to paper pencil test on the Keystone Exams.
Provide transportation after school hours for students wanting to stay for after school
tutoring or activities, could be a few days a month.
9 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 83 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. Evidence: N/A. Evidence indicates that this Standard is meeting or exceeding expectations.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: School Improvement and Planning
Are there school improvement and
planning standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the School Improvement
Planning Standard. The Strategic Plan appears to be a well-crafted document with appropriate goals for the
district.
There is good communication via electronic methods such as the website, social media,
and email.
Moving the ninth grade into the high school seems to be a positive change.
Changed the bell schedule seems to have maximize instructional time.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 84 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
School Improvement Planning Standard. The high school building does a good job of implementing state and district initiatives but
feel that new programs are brought forth by central administration rather quickly.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to School Improvement
Planning that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement. More parent and community involvement could be sought out in 2017 when next
strategic plan is created. While notable, this does not seem to be an extremely significant
issue and may not rise to the level of being part of the action plan.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Strategic and/or long-range plan X
Development/institutional advancement plan X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 85 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FINANCES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related to this Standard
A.1. For Publicly-Funded Schools
This section is not applicable to our school.
A.1.a. FINANCIAL RESOURCES:
Assessed valuation of the school district/school $2,785,000,000
Tax rate per thousand dollars of assessed valuation $17.26
Total budget for the school $72,267,980
A.1.b. ANNUAL PER PUPIL COSTS:
PER PUPIL
COSTS
Current
Academic
Year
Last
Academic
Year
Early Age
School/Center $N/A $N/A
Secondary/
Upper School $16,948 $16,357
Middle School $16,948 $16,357
Elementary
School/Lower
School
$19,948 $16,357
A.1.c. INSURANCE FOR THE SCHOOL:
Adequacy of Coverage
TYPE OF INSURANCE Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Property liability x
Employee liability x
Administration liability x
Governing body liability x
Theft, fraud, deceit x
Tuition increase N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 86 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Adequacy of Coverage
TYPE OF INSURANCE Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Travel and field trips x
Institution-owned vehicles x
Other (describe): x
A.2. For Non-Public, Independent And Proprietary Schools
X This section is not applicable to our school.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 87 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 4:
Finances
The Standard: Financial resources are sufficient to provide the educational
opportunities defined in the school’s philosophy/mission. The business practices of the
school are ethical. These practices promote confidence in the school’s ability to manage
fiscal and material resources in a responsible manner and follow prescribed budgeting
and accounting principles. The majority of resources raised for school purposes is
dedicated to the school’s operations.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Chris Cummings, faculty member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
David Hall, director of finances and operations Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kathy Pozar, community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Bonni Rossi, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Angela Costanzo, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kathy Aluise, paraprofessional Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jessica Hoffman, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Michael Ribar, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Rick Dervanik, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Nick Hand, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Maggie Baker, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
4.1 – 4.12: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
4.1 The school implements written financial policies
and procedures that are in accordance with
accepted business practices.
X
4.2 The governance and leadership exercise prudent
control over all financial operations. X
4.3 Levels of income and expenditures are in
appropriate balance. Current assets are sufficient
to meet current liabilities.
X
4.4 Finances are currently stable and projections X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 88 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
indicate continuing stability.
4.5 The school develops short- and long-range
financial plans to ensure resources are available to
deliver its educational program and services.
X
4.6 Stakeholders have opportunities to provide input
into financial plans. The staff is involved in
determining priorities for curriculum and
instructional needs.
X
4.7 Families enrolling students in the school are
informed in advance of all financial obligations for
attending the school.
X
4.8 Those entrusted with overseeing and conducting
the financial and business operations of the school
possess appropriate qualifications.
X
4.9 Periodic audits or financial reviews are conducted
by qualified external agencies and the school
responds appropriately.
X
4.10 The school has written, reasonable, and equitable
tuition, collection, and refund policies. N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.11 The school carries adequate insurance coverage
including business interruption, casualty,
property, and liability insurance for employees
and the governance/owner, as appropriate.
X
4.12 The school makes prudent use of resources
available through development activities, grants,
foundations, and other partnerships.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 89 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.13 – 4.15: Indicators for faith-based schools10 X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Minimal updates needed
Seem to be efficiently using resources
Stakeholders have input into budgeting,
Site-based budgeting seems to work
Haven't made course cuts to make budget
B.2. Evidence: N/A. The indicators show that the school is meeting or exceeding these standards.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Finances
Are there finances standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N.A
10 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 90 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Finances Standard. The district has a medium to high and stable real estate value per student.
The district has a medium to high personal income level per student.
The district has had a significant positive fund balance continually for the last 20 years.
The district has a well-educated and credentialed staff in the business office, including
the Director (CPA), Accounting Manager (CPA), and clerical staff (4 of 6 with bachelor
degrees).
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Finances Standard. A significant trend that the school is experiencing is the transferring of students to charter
and cyber schools. When a student transfers to a charter or cyber-school, the funding
received by the district for the student travels with the student. This leads to a significant
amount of money leaving the district without the district having ability to decrease
offerings to students because the changes in enrollment are not centralized in one specific
area of the district. Therefore, the district will still have expenditures for those offerings
with less revenue. This has the possibility of creating potential financial shortfalls.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Finances that should be
included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and Improvement. Cooperation with governmental officials to address inherent unfairness in the cyber-
charter funding system. While notable, this does not seem to be an extremely significant
issue and may not rise to the level of being part of the action plan as it is a district and
statewide issue rather than a building issue.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard Evidence School
Current operating budget (for main campus and each branch campus) X
Schedule of student tuition and fees (for non-public and proprietary
institutions) X
Evidence that the institution has no contingent liabilities or on-going
litigations that potentially could affect the institution’s ability to continue
operation
X
Summary of the institution’s insurance coverage (for main campus and
each branch) X
Policies related to finances, financial aid, and refunds X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 91 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FACILITIES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. PHYSICAL FACILITIES.
Facility Location Year
Constructed
Most Recent
Renovation Ownership
NHSD Senior
High School
53 Rochester Rd.
Pittsburgh, PA.
15229
1972 2007 Architectural
and MEP
X Owned
Leased
NHSD Middle
School
55 Rochester Rd.
Pittsburgh, PA.
15229 1958
1999 Architectural and MEP
Improvements
2014 HVAC & Technology
Improvements
X Owned
Leased
NHSD West View
Elementary
School
47 Chalfont St.
Pittsburgh, PA.
15229
1927
1998 Architectural and MEP
Improvements
2012 HVAC and Technology
Improvements
X Owned
Leased
NHSD Ross
Elementary
School
90 Houston Rd.
Pittsburgh, PA.
15237
1962 2010 Architectural
and MEP
X Owned
Leased
NHSD Highcliff
Elementary
School
156 Peony Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA.
15229
1956 2009 Architectural
and MEP
X Owned
Leased
NHSD McIntyre
Elementary
School
200 McIntyre Rd.
Pittsburgh, PA.
15237
1966 2008 Architectural
and MEP
X Owned
Leased
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 92 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. ADEQUACY OF FACILITIES.
BUILDINGS
Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Elementary X
Middle X
High X
RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Dormitories X
Sleeping rooms X
Common areas X
Dining areas X
Bathrooms X
Recreational areas X
Heating X
Lighting X
Ventilation X
Provisions for the
disabled (ADA) X
Cleanliness X
A.2.a.. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
N/A. All facilities are currently “Satisfactory.”
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 93 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3. MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING STAFF:
Type of Facilities Personnel Number Adequacy of Type and Number
Maintenance 11.5
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Cleaning 40.5
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Grounds 1.5
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Other: Delivery Drive 1
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Other: Summer Student
Workers Cleaning 5
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Other: Summer Student
Workers Grounds 4
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
A.3.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
N/A. All facilities staff needs are currently “Satisfactory.”
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 94 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.4. CONDITION OF FACILITIES.
A.4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
School Building(s) X
Furnishings X
Provisions for the
Disabled X
Variety of
Instructional Spaces X
Laboratories X
Counseling/Guidance
Space(s) X
Health Services
Space(s) X
Library/Learning
Media Center X
Administrative and
Support Spaces X
Offices and Planning
Spaces for the Faculty X
Heating, Ventilation,
Air Conditioning X
Electrical, Water, and
Sanitation Systems X
Energy Conservation
System X
Security System X
Storage Spaces X
Parking Spaces X
Athletic Fields X
Indoor Athletic
Space(s) X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 95 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Cafeteria/Dining
Space(s) X
Auditorium/Theater X
Dormitories X
Chapel X
A.5. ADEQUACY AND QUALITY OF MAINTENANCE/CLEANING.
A.5.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
School Building(s) X
Furnishings X
Provisions for the
Disabled X
Instructional Spaces X
Laboratories X
Counseling/Guidance
Space(s) X
Health Services Space(s) X
Library/Learning Media
Center X
Administrative and
Support Spaces X
Offices and Planning
Spaces for the Faculty X
Heating, Ventilation, Air
Conditioning X
Electrical, Water, and
Sanitation Systems X
Energy Conservation
System X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 96 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Security System X
Storage Spaces X
Parking Spaces X
Athletic Fields X
Indoor Athletic Space(s) X
Cafeteria/Dining Space(s) X
Auditorium/Theater X
Dormitories X
Chapel X
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 97 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 5:
Facilities
The Standard: School facilities are safe, clean, and well maintained. The physical
environment supports delivery of the educational program/services as well as optimal
student development and achievement. Facilities are appropriate and adequate to
implement the philosophy/mission of the school. They are regularly inspected for
effective operation and meet all applicable laws including health and safety code
requirements.
Name Stakeholder Group
2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Kevin Swindell, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Mike Scarpaci, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Steve Long, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Regina Moorby, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Matt Demharter, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jeff Boulos, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
5.1 – 5.6: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
5.1 The school’s facilities and equipment are
appropriate for achieving its philosophy/mission
and are healthy, safe, and well maintained.
X
5.2 The school plans for, funds, and schedules regular
preventative measures, repairs, and maintenance
of its facilities and equipment.
X
5.3.a The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for instruction;
X
5.3.b The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 98 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
appropriate accommodation for instruction;
5.3.c The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for administration;
X
5.3.d The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for: conferences;
X
5.3.e The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for student activities;
X
5.3.f The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for storage of school
property; and
X
5.3.g The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for storage for
student belongings.
X
5.4 Sufficient systems are in place to monitor and
adjust air quality to appropriate levels. X
5.5 Lighting is adequate and appropriate in student
and staff areas. X
5.6 Sufficient space is available for ingress, egress,
and traffic flow within the facilities. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Sharing of classrooms indicates that there is not appropriate space for all.
Conference areas and large group areas are too small.
HVAC not consistent throughout building.
Temperature controls are inconsistent
Exterior lighting needs improvement.
Campus is open in early morning and street crossing can be dangerous.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 99 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. Evidence: N/A. The indicators show that the standard is being met or exceeded.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Facilities
Are there facilities standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Facilities Standard. North Hills School District has undertaken a vigorous modernization and renovation
program since 2007. The dates of each renovation are listed in section A.1 of this
document.
Replacement and upgrades to building envelope components such as doors, windows,
roofs and improved insulation have been included in the scope of work.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 100 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
An integral part of the scope incorporated air conditioning all building. The final air
conditioning system is scheduled to come on line at the middle school during August of
2015.
All mechanical, electric and plumbing (MEP) infrastructures have been replaced as listed
in section A.1. At NHSD Middle School and West View Elementary electrical and
plumbing systems were updated to support the installation of air conditioning.
All classrooms have upgraded technology including interactive boards, overhead
projectors, document cameras and voice enhancement as needed.
Indoor air quality is achieved by insuring outdoor air is introduced into every HVAC
system. Inspection of air filters and terminal equipment is conducted on a regular
schedule.
Facility cleaning is modeled after standards set forth by APPA (Association of Physical
Plant Administrators). Quality control is achieved through daily inspections that are
digitally recorded and used to enhance the performance of each custodian.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Facilities Standard. As the budget allows, we need to keep up foundational maintenance to prevent untimely
breakage of resources.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Facilities that should be
included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and Improvement. Currently all NHSD facilities provide modern accommodations from both technology and
an architectural frame of reference. These improvements provide an environment where
the teaching staff and students can interact in a comfortable modern setting. Analyzing
and prioritizing future technology and facility enhancements has been recognized by the
school board and senior administrators. The Director of Finance and Operations and the
Director of Facility services are developing the process where future enhancements be
realized. While notable, this may not rise to the level of being part of the action plan as it
is a district situation rather than a building issue.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard Evidence School
Floor plan of facilities X
Long-range facilities plan X
Maintenance/repair schedules X
Plans for any facilities improvements X
Policies related to facilities X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 101 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SCHOOL CLIMATE AND ORGANIZATION STANDARD
FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 102 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 6:
School Climate and Organization
The Standard: The school’s organizational structure and climate facilitate
achievement of its core values as expressed in the philosophy/mission. The school
culture supports successful implementation of age- and developmentally appropriate
educational programs and services. Roles, responsibilities, expectations, and reporting
relationships are clearly defined. Administrative, instructional, and support staff are
qualified, competent, and sufficient in number to effectively provide quality
educational experiences. The school regularly conducts staff performance appraisals
and offers professional development opportunities informed by its philosophy/mission.
Relationships among the staff and leadership are collegial and collaborative.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
John Kreider, administrator and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
John California, faculty and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Rose Ann Ault, community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Lauren Vales, faculty and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Peter Torres, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
David Sentner, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Michelle Medic, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Katie Baumgartel, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kellee Kanith, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Brandon Pfab, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jeff Keenan, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
6.1 – 6.19: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.1 The school’s design, organization, climate, and
leadership support attainment of the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
6.2 Designated, qualified leadership provides
coordination, supervision, and direction for the
educational program, student services, and
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 103 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
student activities.
6.3 A logical and clear table of organization for the
school includes written job descriptions that
specify levels of responsibility and reporting
relationships.
X
6.4 Administrative, instructional, and support staffs
are qualified, competent, and sufficient in number
to meet the needs of the total educational
program, student services, and student activities.
X
6.5 Staff members, including administrators, are
assigned to work based on their education,
preparation, experience, expertise, and
commitment to the school’s success.
X
6.6 The school implements written personnel policies
and procedures for the operation of the school and
makes them available to all employees.
X
6.7 The school implements written policies and
procedures for determining adequate
compensation, arriving at reasonable workloads
and acceptable working conditions, and defining
just and fair treatment for all staff.
X
6.8 The school implements written policies and
procedures for evaluating staff performance.
Performance appraisals are conducted with the
knowledge of the staff member and reported in
writing as well as verbally. Results are used to
make professional development
recommendations. Staff members have an
opportunity to discuss and appeal their
appraisals.
X
6.9 Staff members are provided opportunities to offer
input into the content of their professional
development programs.
X
6.10 The school implements written policies and
procedures for handling complaints/grievances by
members of the staff.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 104 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.11 The school implements written policies and
procedures for orienting and mentoring new staff
members.
X
6.12 The school implements written policies and
procedures to ensure that service providers not
employed by the school are appropriately
oriented, supervised, and supported.
X
6.13 The working environment for the staff promotes
collegiality, high expectations, trust, support, and
recognition for accomplishments and
contributions.
X
6.14 Professional satisfaction and good general morale
characterize the school’s staff. X
6.15 Staff members are committed to the school,
dedicated to their work, and take pride in the
outcome of their efforts.
X
6.16 The leadership encourages staff members’
affiliation with professional organizations. X
6.17 The school’s families and community demonstrate
commitment to, pride in, and support for the
school through participation, promotion of its
mission, and financial support.
X
6.18 Members of the staff, students, and their families
feel safe in the school. X
6.19 A clearly defined, written code of student conduct
supports an environment that is conducive to
learning and is understood by students, staff, and
families. The code is enforced fairly and
uniformly.
X
6.20 - 6.28: Indicators for schools that are part of a public school district,
archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other school
organization with a central office staff X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 105 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
6.29 – 6.31: Indicators for schools with early age programs X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
6.32: Indicator for schools that provide distance education This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.32 Appropriately qualified faculty members
participate in distance-learning tasks including
grading student work, telephone consultation
with students, academic counseling, course
revision, and development of study guides.
X
6.33 – 6.43: Indicators faith-based schools11 X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
6.44 – 6.46: Indicators for all Pennsylvania public, independent, and faith-
based schools These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.44 The school has and implements a written policy
that requires all applicants for employment with
the school, including employees of independent
contractors but excluding employees who do not
have direct contact with students, to undergo the
following background checks prior to being hired
or contracted:
X
11 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 106 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
a. Pennsylvania State Police Request for Criminal
Records Check;
b. PA Department of Public Welfare Child Abuse
History Clearance; and
c. Federal Criminal History Record Information
(CHRI) from a FBI fingerprint-based background
check.12
6.45 The school has and implements a written policy
that requires the school to review applicants’
required background check reports prior to their
being hired or contracted to determine the fitness
of the individual to work in a position in which
s/he will have contact with children.
X
6.46 The school has and implements a policy that
requires the school to keep on file copies of the
required background check reports for all staff
hired or contracted on or after April 1, 2007.13
X
A.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Faculty and students are willing to get involved, a sense of togetherness, school spirit
Division of guidance counselors, principals according to grade-level seems to work.
Including ninth grade in high school worked
Students athletes miss less class time due to new school hours
Too many students are unexcused absent.
Challenges from Yik-Yak, proper behavior on social media make having a 100% positive
culture difficulty.
Announcements need to be available in ALL rooms (currently not available in cafeteria,
spotty at the middle school)
Testing demands impact school day
12 Act 114 of 2006 (state law) specifies that all applicants for employment with public and private schools
including employees of independent contractors, but excluding employees who do not have direct
contact with students undergo background checks noted in Indicator 6.11. In addition, Act 114 extended
the background check requirements to include student teacher candidates prior to their field experience.
Student teacher background check reports are to be submitted to their higher education administrator.
13 Act 114 of 2006 and the PA Public School Code, Section 1-111 requires public and private schools to
keep a copy of each background check report for each staff person hired on or after April 1, 2007 for the
duration of time the individual is employed by that school. This also applies to school contractors.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 107 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
We need a walkway that connects the buildings create a Freshman orientation class
(address study skills, social skills, social media, etc.)
Too many students have to see the principals.
A.2. Evidence: N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
C. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: School Climate and Organization
Are there school climate and
organization standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 108 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Implications for Planning
D.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the School Climate and
Organization Standard.
The North Hills High School culture and organizational structure of the high school
provides the vehicle for carrying out the established philosophy, mission, beliefs, and/or
objectives of the educational program and support services.
A clearly defined set of reporting relationships exists, and administrative, instructional,
and support staff are qualified, competent and sufficient in number to allow the effective
delivery of quality education to students.
Staff assessment procedures are in place, are clear to all involved, and are collaborative.
On-going professional development, clearly defined roles and responsibilities, and
collegial relationships among staff and administration are evident and conducive to
cooperative action.
Staff members possess the qualifications of education, preparation, experience, and
commitment that contribute to effective learning. Staff members are assigned to work by
reason of their training and/or expertise.
School leadership supports a comprehensive program of professional development for all
staff that addresses school-wide learning expectations and specific student needs by
allocating appropriate time and resources.
The school staff and administration is organized and efficient.
The school day runs smoothly without any major design or organizational problems.
Qualified and competent professional staff respects one another.
Staff members are highly qualified, experienced, and committed to effective learning.
Scheduling options for students are varied and allow students to explore their interests.
Classroom supports for special education students are effective.
Principal leadership is strong and stable.
A well-defined reporting structure is in place.
D.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
School Climate and Organization Standard.
The recently changes to the school schedule has produced little tangible positive results
for the high school. There is significant faculty desire to return to having a formal
homeroom period at the beginning of the day that would be divided by grade level.
Personnel policies and regulations are no longer printed and are only available to
employees online.
A high number of students seem to have policy violations.
A high number of students have unexcused absences.
Staff development programs could be more tailored to the needs of school personnel
according to their input and evaluation.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 109 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to School Climate and
Organization that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
Re-institution of homeroom period from 7:20-7:34 each day.
An examination into the higher rate of unexcused absences and policy violations.
Input should be solicited regarding staff development programs in order to tailor them
more to the needs of school personnel.
Written copies of the personnel policies and regulations can be made available at key
spots in the school such as the faculty lounge and offices. While notable, this may not rise
to the level of being part of the action plan.
E. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Organizational chart for the school and school system X
Floor plan of facilities X
Salary schedules and descriptions of benefits packages for teachers,
specialists, and support staff X
Contracts (e.g. union, collective bargaining agreements) X
Instruments used for evaluating the performance of the staff X
Professional development plan X
Policies related to school climate and organization X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 110 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. EMERGENCY AND CRISIS PLANS:
Type of Emergency/Crisis Plan Effectiveness of
Plans
S NI U
Building Evacuation X
Building/Grounds Search X
Lockdown X
Shelter In Place X
Severe Weather Plan X
Student or Staff Death X
Bomb Threat X
Other: Missing Student/Power Failure X
A.1.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 111 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. EMERGENCY DRILLS:
Type of Emergency Drill Frequency of
Drills Quality of Drills
S NI U
Fire
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Natural Disaster (Severe Weather,
Flooding, etc.)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Bomb Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
External Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Internal Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Bus Evacuation (Twice a Year)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Other: Severe Weather Drill
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
A.2.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 112 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3. HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTION SCHEDULE:
Type of Inspection Frequency
Results of
Inspections
S NI U
Fire Alarm System Pull Station, Horns, Strobes tested Monthly
Smoke Detectors, pull stations, sprinkler
pump, sprinkler system (checked/cleaned
annually)
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
X Annually X
Food Services (Refrigeration, Freezer,
Oven and Food Temps checked daily and log
kept. Food Temps checked each lunch)
Alleg Cty Health Dept Inspections 2 x year
X Daily X
Monthly
X Annually X
Elevator(s) (Certified Elevator mechanic
checks monthly. Bi Annual Certified
Inspection. Every Three Years the hydraulic
system checked for leaks & can withstand
rated weight)
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Internal Communications System (Announcements made weekly – any
difficulties reported)
X Semi-Monthly X
Monthly
Annually
Technology Arts/Industrial Arts
Equipment
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Athletic Equipment (After each season, equipment & uniforms
tested and replaced if needed)
(Bleachers & gym equip inspected yearly)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Playground Equipment (Daily by
building custodian, monthly report by
custodian. Quarterly inspection by
maintenance mechanic)
X
Daily
X
X Monthly X
X Quarterly X
Water Supply (Township Water Authority
sends water quality report yearly)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Swimming Pool Water - Twice Daily on X Daily X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 113 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Inspection Frequency
Results of
Inspections
S NI U School Days, (1x by Cert Pool Mgr), Weekly by
certified laboratory, County Health Dept
surprise inspections 2 x yr.
X Weekly X
X Semi-
Annually X
Other: Door Locking Systems (Daily by custodian, monthly by building
custodian, Semi-annually by maintenance
mechanic, quarterly maintenance mechanic
checks alarms are signaling monitoring
company)
X Daily X
X Monthly X
X Quarterly X
A.3.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
N/A
A.4. SUMMARY OF HEALTH SCREENINGS:
Screening For Conducted By
Frequency
Vision 9-12 grades all
students Certified School Nurse
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Hearing all 11th graders
and Special Ed students Certified School Nurse
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Dental- Not long mandated N/A
Semi-
Monthly
N/A Monthly
N/A Annually
Physical- all 11th graders Student’s private doctor or Semi-
Monthly
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 114 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Screening For Conducted By
Frequency
School Physician Monthly
X Annually
Tuberculosis No longer mandated
N/A Semi-
Monthly
N/A Monthly
N/A Annually
Other: Height/ Weight
9-12 all students Certifies School Nurse or LPN
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
A.5. SUMMARY OF INNOCULATIONS:
Inoculation For In Grade Level
4 doses Diphtheria, Tetanus K-12
3 doses Polio K-12
2 doses Measles, Mumps Rubella K-12
3 doses Hepatitis B K-12
2 doses Varicella (chickenpox) or history of disease K-12
1 dose tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) after age 11 K-12
A.6. PROVISIONS FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY:
Health and Safety Issue Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Adequate health care services at all times. X
Health care at school functions that take place away
from the school’s premises. X
Means to communicate internally in event of power
failure of evacuation of building. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 115 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Health and Safety Issue Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Means to communicate externally in event of power
failure of evacuation of building. X
Place(s) to assemble during an evacuation X
Proper and safe storage of dangerous substances. X
Fire blankets and/or eye wash stations in required areas. X
Automatic external defibrillators available and staff
personnel trained to use them. X
Panic buttons for dangerous equipment. X
Provisions for preventing the spread of infectious
substances and diseases. X
Safety lines in required areas. X
Students and the staff wearing eye and ear protection in
dangerous areas. X
Fire extinguishers available in all areas. X See
A.6.a
Fire alarm pull stations in all areas. X
Evacuation notice and directions posted in all rooms
and spaces. X
A.6.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned. The Safety Team has noticed that a fire extinguisher is not available in the B hallway of the first
floor. This has been ordered and should arrive soon. While notable, this is an individual
situation.
A.7. HEALTH AND SAFETY STAFF:
Type of Health and Safety Personnel Number Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Certified Nurse 1 X
Nurse’s Assistant LPN 1 X
School Security Officer 1 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 116 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Health and Safety Personnel Number Quality and Adequacy
Local Police Security Officer 0 NA NA NA
Athletic Trainer 2 X
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 117 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 7:
Health and Safety
The Standard: A safe, orderly, and healthy environment for teaching and learning is
provided. The school adheres to local, state, and federal government health and safety
requirements. Health, safety, preventive/emergency procedures, and crisis management
policies are clearly written, well documented, implemented, and updated regularly.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Tim McDowell, social worker and safety team
leader
Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Joan Kinder, school nurse Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Cindy Benoit, school LPN Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kim Zwicker, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Linda Geiger, paraprofessional Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
John Kremmel, paraprofessional Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Barb Foster, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Dan Derby, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
John Loeser, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Bonnie Ziff, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
7.1 – 7.15: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
7.1 The school has satisfactory written procedures and
functional equipment with which to communicate
during fire and other emergencies, to summon
assistance, and to evacuate the school’s facilities.
X
7.2 The school provides adequate health care at
school functions that take place away from the
school’s premises.
X
7.3 Appropriate training is provided for all staff
members on how to implement emergency and
crisis plans, handle accidents and illnesses, and
prevent the spread of infectious diseases.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 118 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
7.4 The school appropriately manages the storage and
administration of student medications. X
7.5 The school safely stores equipment and supplies. X
7.6 A system exists to account for the whereabouts of
students at all times. X
7.7 The school maintains comprehensive, current
health records for all students and staff. X
7.8 The school conducts and maintains written
records of regular emergency drills. X
7.9 Designated members of the staff inform faculty
and families (as appropriate to maintain
confidentiality) about students’ health or physical
needs.
X
7.10 The school ensures that the staff is kept up–to-
date on relevant health, wellness, and safety
information and practices, including procedures
to deal with individual student needs.
X
7.11 Working relationships with local authorities and
health service providers are positive and ongoing. X
7.12 The educational program includes opportunities
for students to develop knowledge, attitudes, and
practices necessary for personal wellness and a
healthy lifestyle.
X
7.13 The school has an effective system to control access
to the school by visitors and other non-school
personnel.
X
7.14 Staff members model positive health and safety
practices. X
7.15 Safe drinking water is available throughout the
day for the staff and students. X
7.16: Indicator for schools with early age programs X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 119 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Great professional development is offered in areas in CPR, 1st aid, abuse, drugs and
safety.
School safety plan is practiced often
Health and Family and Consumer Sciences classes promote healthy lifestyles
Full calorie pop is gone/cookies are smaller/French fries are ala carte
Full-time nurse and LPN do a fantastic job, but are overworked.
Physical Education should be required for all students for all grades (including a
swim unit)
Campus security staff do an excellent job. (numerous concerns about the safety of the
hilltop and open campus)
Turning safety team concerns into actions is a concerns
Staff members knowledge and certifications could be used to professionally develop
entire staff
B.2. Evidence:
N/A. Evidence is that this standard is being met or exceeded.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Health and Safety
Are there health and safety
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 120 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Health and Safety
Standard. High school has positive relationships with local law enforcement and with local EMS.
They regularly contribute not only during emergencies but also with class presentations
to students and staff/student professional development and training.
School safety officer has extensive law enforcement experience and positive relationship
with local police forces. He creates positive relationships with students.
School nursing staff promotes wellness via weekly emails and articles.
School provides free flu shots to school staff.
High school safety team is comprised of a group of administrators and faculty volunteers
dedicated to safety.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Health and Safety Standard. The ratio of nursing staff to students is reaching maximum level as required by the state.
Offsite events and field trips may not always have health staffs present due to
availability.
Students that arrive to the building on school district transportation are not supervised
prior to 7:05am.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Health and Safety that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Student bus and arrival schedule should be examined to determine if it can be adjusted to
create safer environment in the morning. While notable, this may not rise to the level of
being part of the action plan.
Enrollment should be monitored to ensure that school is adhering to state policies for
nursing staff to student ratios. While notable, this may not rise to the level of being part
of the action plan.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard Evidence School
Emergency and crisis plans X
Records of most recent health and safety inspections X
Record of emergency drills X
Emergency Procedures section of Faculty Handbook X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 121 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SUMMARY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM:
X The instructional hours are reported for one academic year
The instructional hours are reported for one academic semester
Grade
Level
English/
Language
Arts
REQUIRED
Math
Science
Social
Studies
The Arts
Other
Languages
Health/
P.E.
Technology
9 122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
61 hours
(40 min x
92 days)
Varies, not
required for
graduation
10 122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
61 hours
(40 min x
92 days)
Varies, not
required for
graduation
11 122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
61 hours
(40 min x
92 days)
Varies, not
required for
graduation
12 122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
122 hours
(40 min x
184 days)
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
Varies, not
required
for
graduation
61 hours
(40 min x
92 days)
Varies, not
required for
graduation
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 122 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 123 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Educational Program
The Standard: An effective educational program for a school consists of both
carefully planned and well executed curriculum programs and solid instructional
pedagogy. Also fundamental to a successful educational program are the means to
assess student performance and growth as well as programmatic evaluation. Thus,
curriculum, instruction, and assessment are often considered to be the “heart” of any
school since these three components have such an impact on the total school experience
of students. The curriculum outlines what students should know and be able to do.
Instruction identifies effective ways for teachers to ensure student learning takes place.
Assessment indicates at what level students are able to demonstrate knowledge, skills,
and attitudes.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Jaime DeWeese, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Olga Smyers, parent community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Barb Burnett, parent and community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Barb Foster, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jessica Linden, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Lisa Palmieri, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Peter Heil, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
8.1 – 8.16: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.1 Written curriculum guides identify program
objectives and define the scope and sequence of
the educational program. The guides are
functional.
X
8.2 The educational program provides instruction in
the basic subject areas of language arts and
literature (including early language development
and literacy skills, speaking, writing, and listening
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 124 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
communication skills), mathematics, the sciences,
and social sciences.
8.3 The educational program includes experiences in
visual and performing arts, health, world
languages, and physical education.
X
8.4 The educational program provides experiences
that promote students’ critical thinking,
reasoning, problem-solving skills, and study
skills.
X
8.5 The educational program includes instruction in
effective uses of information technology and
provides opportunities for application.
X
8.6 A variety of group learning settings (e.g.,
individual, small group, large group) is provided
for students daily.
X
8.7 The educational program offers opportunities for
development of social skills—such as increasing
self-control and a sense of individual and group
responsibility—in interaction with adults and
peers.
X
8.8 Written curriculum and instruction policies and
procedures provide direction to the staff,
leadership, and other stakeholders in the
development, implementation, and improvement
of the educational program.
X
8.9 Provision is made for both horizontal and vertical
articulation and coordination of the educational
program among all levels of the school.
X
8.10 An overview of the educational program, school
policies and procedures, and other pertinent
information is available in written form to
students and their parents.
X
8.11 The educational program defines desired student
outcomes as expressed in terms of student
understanding, knowledge, attitudes, skills, and
habits.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 125 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.12 Course or program objectives are simply stated
and understandable to students. X
8.13 The educational program considers the ages,
cultures, and varying levels of ability of students. X
8.14 The instructional program is designed to meet
students’ needs in accordance with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
8.15 The educational program and its expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school’s stakeholders.
X
8.16 Curriculum development is a dynamic, emergent
process influenced by the attributes and interests
of the children, their families, and teachers.
X
8.17 – 8.23: Indicators for schools with early age programs X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.24 – 8.25: Indicators for schools with elementary school programs X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.26 – 8.27: Indicators for schools with middle school programs X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.28 – 8.31: Indicators for schools with secondary school programs These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.28 The educational program facilitates a smooth
transition from elementary or middle school to
secondary school.
X
8.30 The educational program provides appropriate
educational programs for students who are
concluding formal study as well as those planning
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 126 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
further education.
8.31 The educational program develops habits of the
mind and attitudes required for success in further
education and in the workplace.
X
8.32 – 8.36: Indicators for schools that provide distance education.
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.32 Student interaction (synchronous and
asynchronous) with faculty and other students is
facilitated through a variety of means as an
essential characteristic of the educational
program.
X
8.33 Students and their families (if appropriate) are
informed about any aspects of the educational
program that are created or delivered by an
organization other than the school.
X
8.34 Stated student performance outcomes for
programs delivered through distance education
are achievable through that methodology.
X
8.35 Instructional materials are developed by authors
qualified in distance education techniques.
Textbooks and other instructional materials are
suitable for distance learning.
X
8.36 Appropriate study skills necessary for students to
utilize a distance education model effectively and
efficiently are included as part of the educational
program and instructional process.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 127 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
8.37 – 8.48: Indicators for faith-based schools14 X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings
Offer rigorous AP, CHS, and Honors courses
The variety of course offerings, levels within course offerings is excellent
Each department offers courses allowing students to challenge themselves
Online academy which allows students to branch out into other areas of interest via
online learning,
Remediation courses for keystones seem to be helping.
Scheduling conflicts can limit students from being able to take advantage of all of the
courses that we have to offer
Lack of academic help for students (i.e. homeroom tutoring)-look at ways to incorporate
academic tutoring (i.e. as a duty) since it is no longer available during homeroom and not
assuming that students will be able to stay after school;
Smaller study halls in classrooms so that students are able to focus on academics and get
help if necessary; more staffing to be able to strengthen educational programs that we
have in place;
Allow TAs to be assigned to the same subject matter year after year to provide
consistency for students and staff
B.2. Evidence:
N/A. Evidence is that this standard is being met or exceeded.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
14
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 128 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Educational Programs
Are there educational program
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Educational Program
Standard.
The educational programs consist of both carefully planned and well executed curriculum
programs that include appropriate standards, solid instructional pedagogy, and
appropriate assessment based on research and best practices.
The educational programs are sufficiently financed, periodically reviewed, and mission-
appropriate. They are developed to meet and address the needs of students and are
designed to produce student learning at all levels.
Effective policies and practices are in place, along with instructional materials,
technology, and equipment that are appropriate, functional, and well-maintained.
The secondary school educational program provides instruction in the basic subject areas
of language arts and literature (including speaking, writing, and listening skills),
mathematics, the sciences and social sciences.
The secondary school educational program provides experiences in the arts, health, world
languages, and physical education.
Staff members possess the qualifications of education, preparation, experience, and
commitment that contribute to effective learning. Staff members are assigned to work by
reason of their training and/or expertise.
School leadership supports a comprehensive program of professional development for all
staff that addresses school-wide learning expectations and specific student needs by
allocating appropriate time and resources.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 129 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Staff members are highly qualified, experienced, and committed to effective learning.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Educational Program Standard. Curriculum writing does not currently include student or parent input.
The recently changes to the school schedule has produced little tangible positive results
for the high school. There is significant faculty desire to return to having a formal
homeroom period at the beginning of the day that would be divided by grade level.
Staff development programs relating to curriculum could be more tailored to the needs of
different school personnel.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Educational Program that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement. Re-institution of homeroom period divided by grade level from 7:20am to 7:34am.
Professional development opportunities could be offered regarding specific curricular
(IE: physical education, music, school counseling, etc.) and how to deal with district
issues (increased poverty).
Methods of increasing parent and student input in curriculum development will be
developed. While notable, may not rise to the level of being part of the action plan.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of this Standard
Evidence School
Program of studies X
Scope and sequence charts X
Written curriculum guides for each component of the educational program X
Master schedule X
Policies related to educational program X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 130 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ASSESSMENT AND EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING
STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING:
Please see previously provided data on student Keystone scores, GPA, student post-secondary
matriculation, and Advanced Placement data located in the Profile of Student Performance
section. Additional data regarding student learning includes:
Name of Assessment Grade Level(s)
Administered
Curricular
Area(s)
Assessed
Evaluation of Most
Recent Results
S NI U
PSAT - Critical Reading
section 9 - 11
ELA X
PSAT – Math section Math X
PSAT – Written section ELA X
Name of Assessment Grade Level(s)
Administered
Curricular
Area(s)
Assessed
Evaluation of Most
Recent Results
S NI U
SAT - Critical Reading
section 11 - 12
ELA X
SAT – Math section Math X
SAT – Written section ELA X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 131 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 132 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
94% 93% 92.1%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Baseline
Per
cen
t o
f S
enio
r C
oh
ort
Year
Graduation Rate with Cohort
90% 90%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2012-2013 2013-2014 Baseline
Per
cen
t of
Sen
ior
Coh
ort
Year
Post-Secondary Education Upon Graduation
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 133 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1538
1541
1538
1536.5
1537
1537.5
1538
1538.5
1539
1539.5
1540
1540.5
1541
1541.5
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Baseline
Sco
re (
3 a
reas)
Year
Average SAT Scores
8.7%
9.2%
9.4%
8.20%
8.40%
8.60%
8.80%
9.00%
9.20%
9.40%
9.60%
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
Baseline
Per
cen
tag
e o
f S
eno
r C
oh
ort
Year
Repetition of Graduation Course
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 134 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment to Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 135 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 9:
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
The Standard: The school systematically collects and rigorously analyzes
quantifiable and observable evidence of individual learning and growth from multiple
valid and reliable sources. Evidence of student learning is used to evaluate and improve
curriculum effectiveness, instructional practices, professional development, and
support services. Progress in student learning and performance is expected and is
accurately, clearly, and systematically reported to the school community.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Bill McGahee, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Diane Flynn, faculty and community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kurt Zebley, faculty and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Karen Grumski, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Tom Lisak, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Angela Sefscik, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Mandi Downey, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Megan Buller, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Tom Lisak, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
9.1 – 9.15: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.1 The leadership and staff commit to, participate in,
and share in accountability for student learning. X
9.2 Assessment of student learning and performance
is aligned with curriculum and instruction in a
coherent system consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
9.3.a Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for individual students as
they move through the school
X
9.3.b Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for cohorts of students as they X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 136 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
move through the school
9.3.c Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for comparable (local, state,
and national) groups outside of the school
X
9.4 Assessment results are used to make decisions
regarding allocation of resources. X
9.5 The assessment of student learning and
performance enables students to monitor their
own learning progress and teachers to adapt their
instruction to students’ specific learning needs.
X
9.6 Assessment methods and content address suitable
social, emotional, physical, and
cognitive/language goals for students.
X
9.7 Assessments take into account recent, reliable
research findings on child development and
growth.
X
9.8 Assessments reflect understanding of the unique
needs and backgrounds of each student. X
9.9 Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained. General standards for transcript
control and use, including those related to
confidentiality, are known and observed.
X
9.10 Assessment results are the basis for making
recommendations to families whose children may
benefit from further evaluation. Referrals to
specialists are made for early identification of
possible disabilities and/or health conditions.
X
9.11 Members of the staff work collaboratively with
colleagues and families to review data about
learners’ progress and to develop appropriate
strategies for continued progress.
X
9.12 Families are viewed as an important source of
information and insights about students. X
9.13 The school communicates its assessment policies
and practices to the total school community (e.g.,
via parent handbooks, web sites, teacher
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 137 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
handbooks, policy manuals).
9.14 Communication with families regarding students’
progress in learning and performance is regular,
productive, and meaningful.
X
9.15 Students learn and perform at levels expected, or
progress is being made to raise results
accordingly.
X
9.16: Indicator for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
9.17 - 9.20: Indicators for schools that provide distance education These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.17 The school implements written policies and
procedures to ensure that students fulfill program
requirements personally and without
inappropriate assistance.
X
9.18 The school implements written policies and
procedures to ensure the identity of the students
when assessment of learning is conducted
electronically or by means other than in a location
in which the student is in the presence and under
the direct supervision of a staff member.
X
9.19 Members of the staff who evaluate student
assignments are qualified in the fields they are
evaluating.
X
9.20 Data on lesson and course completion rates are
used to evaluate and revise, as needed,
instructional and educational services.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 138 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
9.21: Indicator for faith-based schools15
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Given our make-up, our students perform really well.
Graduation rate seems low.
Too many students fail graduation courses.
Variety of assessments to address cognitive learning styles within assessments
Too much standardized testing (over testing the students)
Return to testing days?
Use motivational videos to enhance importance of high stake tests and to raise morale of
entire building environment
Common planning time with teachers of same content/grade level
B.2. Evidence:
N/A. The evaluation and evidence indicates that this standard is being met or exceeded.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
15
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 139 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Are there assessment and evidence
of student learning standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Assessment and Evidence
of Student Learning Standard.
The assessments given to North Hills High School students are used both nationally and
statewide to measure student success.
Administration of these assessments is both carefully planned based upon appropriate
standards, solid instructional pedagogy, and appropriate assessment based on research
and best practices.
Curricular adjustments are regularly made based upon assessment results in order to meet
and address the needs of students and are designed to produce positive results to student
learning at all levels.
Effective policies and practices are in place, along with instructional materials,
technology, and equipment that are appropriate, functional, and well-maintained.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard.
Revisions to the PSAT and SAT will require curricular updates in order to prepare
students for this new version of these assessments.
Graduation rate of 92.1% should be addressed.
The number of students who do not pass a course required for graduation should be
addressed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 140 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Assessment and Evidence
of Student Learning that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for
Growth and Improvement. Revisions to the PSAT and SAT will require curricular updates in order to prepare
students for this new version of these assessments. Graduation rate of 92.1% should be addresses.
The number of students who do not pass a course required for graduation should be
addressed.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Example of student transcript X
Example student report card X
Reports of the results of assessments administered to students X
Policies related to assessment of student learning X
Keystone testing schedule X
AP Testing packet X
PSAT Testing prep materials X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 141 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STUDENT SERVICES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. STUDENT SERVICES STAFF:
Type of Student
Services Personnel Number Source
Adequacy of
Type and Number
S NI U
Guidance Counselor 4 4 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Psychologist 2 2 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Psychiatrist 0 Staff N/A
Outsourced
Substance Abuse
Counselor 1
1 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Certified Special
Education Teacher 10
10 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Special Education
Paraprofessional 14
14 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Food Services 16 16 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Transportation 23 0 Staff X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 142 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Student
Services Personnel Number Source
Adequacy of
Type and Number
S NI U
Services 23 Outsourced
Admissions
Counselor 1
1 Staff X
0 Outsourced
Other: Social Worker 1
1 Staff
X 0 Outsourced
Outsourced
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 143 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Student Services
The Standard: The school implements written policies and procedures, in
partnership with families and the community, that provide all students with, or refer
them to, services that are age- and developmentally appropriate to optimize
opportunities for life-long success. Student services are systematic and integral to the
educational program. They are provided by qualified personnel, sufficiently financed,
periodically evaluated, and philosophy/mission appropriate.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Nicole Bezila, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Daria White, parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
David Barkovich, community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Holly Michael, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Maryssa Hestin, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Deb Davis, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Nicole Weber, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jason Greathouse, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Kathy Helfrich, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jen Ortiz, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Barb Drennen, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
10.1 – 10.26: Indicators for all schools
Student Support Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.1 Student support services address academic skills
development, social skills development, personal
growth, and career planning.
X
10.2 Counselors, administrators, teachers, and/or other
staff members share responsibility for providing
guidance and support to students.
X
10.3 The school is sensitive to the critical importance of X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 144 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
non-academic needs of students. A process is in
place to address students’ emotional and social
needs.
10.4 Assessment data are used to adapt curriculum
and teaching methods, provide personalized
counseling, and identify appropriate program
placement for students.
X
10.5 Career awareness activities are provided as
appropriate. X
10.6 Student support services extend into and
incorporate community services as needed. X
10.7 Student data are current, comprehensive, and
readily available for the staff’s use. X
10.8 Follow-up studies of graduates and other former
students are carried out and data are shared with
staff to help determine the effectiveness of the
school’s educational program and services.
X
10.9 The school offers an orientation program for new
students and their families to share the school’s
philosophy/mission, policies, procedures, and
expectations.
X
10.10 Families are provided with information about
child development, education, and related topics
through personal communications, pamphlets,
meetings, and referrals to web sites and other
resources.
X
Transportation Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.11 Written policies and procedures are implemented
to ensure the safety of students when being
picked up, transported, and dropped off by
transportation provided by the school.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 145 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.12 Appropriate training is provided to transportation
providers. X
10.13 Transportation services provided or contracted by
the school meet the safety requirements of all
appropriate legal authorities.
X
Food Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.14 Student dining areas are functional and hygienic. X
10.15 Meals provided by the school meet generally
accepted nutritional standards. Information about
nutritional values of the foods is available.
X
10.16 Appropriate training is provided to food services
providers. X
10.17 Food services personnel meet the health
requirements of all appropriate authorities. X
10.18 Food service facilities are inspected regularly and
meet the health and safety requirements of all
appropriate authorities.
X
Services for Student with Special Needs
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.19 The school implements written policies and
procedures to identify and address the needs of
students with special needs.
X
10.20 The school provides or refers families to
appropriate related services and/or
accommodations to meet student needs.
X
10.21 As applicable, the school is in compliance with all
local, state, and federal requirements related to
students with special needs.
X
Admissions and Placement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 146 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.22 The school implements written admissions policies
and procedures. X
10.23 The school implements written policies and
procedures for placement of students in
appropriate programs and levels.
X
10.24 Applicants for enrollment and their families are
clearly informed of the philosophy/mission of the
school, the nature and extent of the educational
program and services available, tuition and fees (if
applicable), school policies, and expectations for
satisfactory student performance.
X
10.25 The school accepts students for whom there is a
reasonable expectation of success in the
educational program as appropriate and
interpreted by law.
X
10.26 All statements and representations relating to the
school’s educational programs, services, and
resources are clear, accurate, and current.
X
10.27 – 10.31: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.27 Prior to admission, prospective students and their
parents/guardians are advised about the self-
motivation and commitment needed for
successful distance learning and the technical
competence required to participate and learn in
the educational program.
X
10.28 Admissions inquiries are handled in a prompt and
thorough manner. X
10.29 Adequate advisory services are available for
students who are having difficulty with their
studies as well as for those who are rapid learners.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 147 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.30 Students are actively encouraged to start,
continue, and finish the program in which they
have enrolled.
X
10.31 The institution implements written policies and
procedures to evaluate students’ previous
academic work and to provide fair and consistent
credit for their previous studies or work
experience.
X
10.32 – 10.35: Indicators for faith-based schools16 X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Very dedicated and educated staff
After school activities bus would help to get kids involved.
Hire for full time transition coordinator with co-op certification.
Online school counseling classes are awesome.
No school counseling department head even though other smaller departments have them.
B.2. Evidence:
N/A. The evaluation and evidence indicates that this standard is being met or exceeded.
A. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
16
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 148 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Are there assessment and evidence
of Student Services standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
C. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Student Services
Standard. North Hills High School provides services to students that removed barriers to learning.
The school counseling services are based upon the American School Counseling
Association model. The school counseling staff provide proactive, reactive, and crisis assistance to students
with academic, personal/emotional and career/college counseling. Other quality services including transportation, food service, services for special needs
students, and enrollment. These areas provide students with a positive, healthy, safe and
efficient experience during their school day. A well designed school counseling curriculum exists to address a variety of student
needs.
The division of caseload assignments permits focused developmentally appropriate
counseling.
Central and building administration/counselor relationship is very positive.
Administration provides excellent assistant to school counseling programming.
The district/school provides a full time student assistance coordinator, as well as school
based mental health counseling services through Mercy Behavioral services.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 149 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Student Services Standard. The limited budget for summer hours for school counselors effects scheduling and
counseling services that could accomplished prior to the opening of school.
All students might not understand the role of the school counselor.
Counselor caseloads create challenges to meeting with each student.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Student Services that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement. Examination of budget increases to summer school counseling hours allocations. Barring
this, devising a schedule in which counselor summer days are spread out among the
summer months. While notable, may not rise to the level of being part of the action plan.
D. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Description of guidance and counseling services available X
Guidance curriculum guide X
Policies related to student services X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 150 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STUDENT LIFE AND STUDENT ACTIVITIES STANDARD
FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SUMMARY OF NON-ATHLETIC STUDENT ACTIVITIES.
Type of Student Activity
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and
Quality of the
Activity
A.F.S. (American Field Service) 60 S
American Sign Language Club 40 S
Astronomy Club 30 S
Band 450 S
Marching 450 S
Bowling 10 S
C.A.D.D. Club 45 S
Cheerleading (JV & Varsity) 34 S
Choirs 140 S
Hilltop Heroes (Comic book club) 30 S
Diversity Council 30 S
Drama/Play/Musical 50/60/100 S
Environmental Club 30 S
French Club 50 S
FBLA (Future Business Leaders of America) 56 S
FTA (Future Teachers of America) 20 S
Graphics Club 34 S
German Club 128 S
Ham Radio 15 S
Japanese Club 20 S
Hands for Service (community service club) 222 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 151 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Student Activity
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and
Quality of the
Activity
Latin Club 60 S
Literary Leaves (literacy magazine) 10 S
NHTV (Multi-Media Club) 17 S
National Honor Society 100 S
Norhian (yearbook) 50 S
Orchestra 450 S
Photo Club 50 S
Pottery Club 48 S
SADD (Students Against Destructive Decisions) 192 S
Science Club 20 S
Spanish Club 99 S
Student Council 40 S
Senior High class officers 30 S
A.2. SUMMARY OF ATHLETIC STUDENT ACTIVITIES.
Type of Student
Activity Available for
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and Quality
of the Activity
Males Females S NI U
Varsity Cross
Country X X 27 X
Varsity Tennis X X 39 X
Varsity/JV Football X 60 X
Varsity/JV Golf X X 16 X
Varsity/JV Soccer X X 65 X
Varsity Volleyball X X 45 X
Varsity Basketball X X 41 X
Varsity Swimming
and Diving X X 37 X
Varsity Wrestling X 20 X
Ice Hockey X 48 X
Bowling X X 8/2 X
Varsity Lacrosse X X 67 X
Varsity Baseball X 37 X
Varsity Softball X 18 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 152 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Student
Activity Available for
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and Quality
of the Activity
Males Females S NI U
Varsity Track X X 116 X
For Schools with Residential Programs
A.3. DAY/BOARDINIG STUDENTS.
Type of Student Percentage of Student Population
Boarding N/A
Day N/A
20%
11%
24%
45%
Student Participation in Sport and Activities: Baseline 2013-14
No Participation
Sports Only
Sports and Activities
Activities Only
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 153 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 154 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 11:
Student Life and Student Activities
The Standard: A healthy atmosphere exists for all students. At all levels, non-
discriminatory, appropriate student activities that supplement classroom experiences or
community life are provided. An appropriate student activities program fosters a
positive intellectual, cultural, and social climate, promotes growth in student leadership
and social interaction skills, and encourages students’ special interests.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Kevin Deitrick, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Chelle Zimmerman, administrator and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Donna Perry, community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Laura Otte, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Dave Schoppe, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Sue Batson, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Ali Rittle, faculty and community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Erin Sutch, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Robin Stein, faculty and community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
11.1. – 11.6: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
11.1 Students are offered opportunities to build their
skills in handling responsibility, taking initiative,
leadership competencies, cooperation, and self-
direction.
X
11.2 Students, staff, families, and the community are
encouraged to offer input about and participate in
student activities.
X
11.3 Staff members, parents, and other volunteers who
lead or participate in student activities are
approved by the school’s leadership, suitably
qualified, and provide appropriate supervision to
students.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 155 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
11.4 The school recognizes student accomplishments,
contributions, and responsibilities in meaningful
ways.
X
11.5 Relationships among staff, volunteers, and
students demonstrate respect, fairness, and
understanding.
X
11.6 The school holds events that include staff,
families, and children. X
11.7 – 11.9: Indicators for boarding schools X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
11.10: Indicator for faith-based schools17 X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Students have the opportunity to participate in a variety of extra-curricular activities before
school, in school, and after school. Most all activities encourage students to develop lifelong
interests.
All students are encouraged to participate in co-curricular activities. Activities are of two
main types- each as important as the other. There are service organizations and special
interest clubs.
All activities and sports interact with each other for the betterment of the North Hills
community.
Values of joining a club are: service to community and to satisfy one’s self esteem,
cooperation and working with other’s for a common goal, creating new interests and friends,
resume builder.
Activities are numerous and take in a wide scope of interest at North Hills. The numbers
indicate that a vast majority of students at North Hills participate in at least one athletic group
and or activity.
17
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 156 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. Evidence: N/A. The evaluation and evidence indicates that this standard is being met or exceeded.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Student Life and Student Activities
Are there assessment and evidence
of Student Services standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Student Life and Student
Activities Standard. A healthy atmosphere exists for all students.
Athletics and activities office is staffed by highly qualified and dedicated individuals.
At all levels, non-discriminatory, appropriate student sports and activities that supplement
classroom experiences or community life are provided.
An appropriate student activities program fosters a positive intellectual, cultural, and
social climate, promotes growth in student leadership and social interaction skills, and
encourages students’ special interests.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 157 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
All students are encouraged to participate in co-curricular activities. Activities are of two
main types- each as important as the other. There are service organizations and special
interest clubs.
Values of joining a club are: service to community and to satisfy one’s self esteem,
cooperation and working with other’s for a common goal, creating new interests and
friends, resume builder.
Teachers are helpful and are willing to provide additional instruction.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Student Life and Student Activities Standard. Continuing to come up with new activities to meet the needs and interests of the students
in a constantly changing and global world.
The school district instituted a moratorium on staff compensation for new activities.
Therefore, many newer and highly attended activities are done with volunteer sponsors
and some previously established activities with lower participation are run by paid
sponsors.
Approximately 80% of the student body participates in a school activity. Therefore 20%
do not.
There is not currently a method of tracking which students participate in which activities
on a larger scale.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Student Life and Student
Activities that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement. Developing a survey of students to determine if a significant number of students are not
involved in any sports, clubs or activities. Students could complete the survey in
homeroom and a team of parents and teachers and administrators could analyze the
results to find ways to involve more students.
Investigate activity bus or activity schedule for student convenience.
An investigation into how to get more students involved in activities could prove
beneficial to making at-risk students more connected to the school.
More equitable funding for activity sponsors could be investigated.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 158 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard Evidence School
Samples of student publications—e.g., yearbook, student newspaper,
literary magazine X
Budget for all athletic activities X
Budget for all non-athletic activities X
Policies on academic eligibility X
Policies related to student life and student activities X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 159 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY
STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY:
Type of Information/Technology Resource Quantity of
Resource
Quality and Adequacy
of Resource
S NI U
Curriculum Focused Printed Books 6637 X
Reference Printed Books 1416 X
Leisure Reading Printed Books 4778 X
Magazine/Journal Subscriptions 39 X
Online Subscriptions 33 X
Curriculum Specific Application Software
Programs 11 X
Administrative Application Software
Programs 12 X
Application Software Programs Available on
School Network 12 X
Networked Desktop Computers for Students 950 X
Networked Laptop Computers for Students 1500 X
Stand Alone Desktop Computers for
Students 2 X
Stand Alone Laptop Computers for Students 0 X
Stand Alone Computers for Students in
Information Resources Center 0 X
Stand Alone Laptop Computers for Students
in Information Resources Center 0 X
Networked Computers for Students in 30 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 160 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Information/Technology Resource Quantity of
Resource
Quality and Adequacy
of Resource
S NI U
Information Resources Center
Networked Laptop Computers for Students
in Information Resources Center 50 X
Networked Desktop and/or Laptop
Computers for the Staff 200 X
Stand Alone Desktop and/or Laptop
Computers for the Staff in Classrooms/
Offices
0 X
Networked Desktop and/or Laptop
Computers for the Staff in Classrooms/
Offices
400 X
Classrooms with Hard-Wired Internet Access 400 X
Classrooms with Wireless Internet Access All X
LCD Projectors 10 X
Overhead Projectors 400 X
Classrooms with TV Monitor 120 X
Classrooms with Monitor Connected to
Computer 0 X
PDAs for Staff 120 X
PDAs for Students 0 X
Video Cameras 10 X
Video Recorders 3 X
Classrooms with Smart Board 275 X
A.2. FACILTIES FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY:
Type of Information/Technology Facility Quality and
Adequacy of Facility
S NI I
Information Resources Center (library, media center) X
Technology Resource Center X
Storage for Information Resources X
Storage for Technology X
Facility for Electronic Production X
Office for Information Resources Staff X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 161 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Information/Technology Facility Quality and
Adequacy of Facility
S NI I
Office for Technology Staff X
A.3. INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY STAFF:
Type of Information Resources and
Technology Personnel Number
Adequacy of Type and
Number
S NI U
Credentialed Information Resources Center
(library, media center) personnel 1 X
Information Resources Center (library,
media center) support personnel 1 X
Technology Support 1 X
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 162 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard
Information Resources and Technology
The Standard: Information resources, materials, and technology are accessible and of
adequate scope, quantity, and quality to facilitate the school’s pursuit of its total
educational program. These resources encourage all students and staff to broaden and
extend their knowledge and skills. Access to appropriate information resources and
technology is provided for students and staff. Appropriate instruction is offered to
develop student and staff inquiry, research, and information literacy skills. Information
technology equipment is functional and well maintained.
Name Stakeholder Group 2014-15 NH Faculty via Google Survey Faculty
2014-15 NH Student Body via Google Survey Students
2014-15 NH Community via Google Survey Parents and Community
Dave Charles, administrator Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Sandy Miller, faculty and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Matt Simon, faculty and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Pat Carey, faculty and parent Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Joe Bosely, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Jim Cassandro, faculty + community member Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
John, Kane, faculty Standard Review Team Member on 11/4+12/3
Reuben Clark, faculty
12.1 – 12.11: Indicators for all schools
Information Resources
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.1 Information resources are properly catalogued, housed,
and periodically reviewed for relevancy and currency. X
12.2 Media center staff is sufficient and appropriately
qualified to provide effective services to students and
staff.
X
12.3 Adequate orientation about the use of media services,
learning resources, and equipment is provided to the
staff and students.
X
12.4 Information resources are appropriately supported
annually with funding from the school’s budget. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 163 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.5 Information resources are age- and developmentally
appropriate, current, and reflect social and cultural
diversity.
X
12.6 Staff and students are provided opportunities to offer
input into the types, quality, and format of the
information resources provided.
X
Technology
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.7 The technology resources staff is sufficient and
appropriately qualified to provide effective
service to students and staff.
X
12.8 Technology resources are appropriately
maintained and supported annually with funding
from the school’s budget.
X
12.9 Adequate skills training on the use of technology
resources and equipment is provided to the staff
and students.
X
12.10 The school implements written policies and
procedures for acceptable use of technology. X
12.11 Long-range planning activities are in place to
ensure that the school keeps pace with
technological changes.
X
12.12 – 12.13: Indicators for schools with early age programs X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
12.14 – 12.15: Indicators for schools that provide distance education These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.14 The technology system is adequate to deliver the
educational program X
12.15 The school provides students with reasonable X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 164 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
technical support for the educational technology
hardware, software, and delivery system required
to implement the educational program.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Qualified faculty and instructors.
Technology is valued throughout our district.
Administration and teachers embrace new technology and students are exposed to more
than most comparable districts.
Our teachers have more technology resources than ever before and training is periodically
provided to staff.
Library promotes 21st century literacy skills.
Technology staff changes at the building level every year. Continuity is not valued and
computer tech staff is not invested in to promote continuity.
1 to 1 technology is a great initiative but at what cost to our current technological needs.
Invest in more computer techs and the proper infrastructure to allow a 1 to 1 initiative to
be executed effectively. Expand upon staff training on new devices.
B.2. Evidence: N/A. The evaluation and evidence indicates that this standard is being met or exceeded.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis N/A. Indicators show that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Foundational Issue: Information Resource and Technology
Are there information resource and
technology standard indicators not YES
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 165 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
X NO
Data to support your conclusion: N/A
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion
N/A
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Information Resources
and Technology Standard. Approximately $70,000 will be dedicated to refurbishing the library into an information
science hub for students, including an additional classroom with updated technology.
Learning media services and technology function as important tools to enhance
classroom instruction and other school activities as grade level appropriate.
Well-organized information resources reinforce knowledge, skills, and attitudes learned
in other program areas and broaden minds by providing opportunities to conduct research
and interact with information.
Excellent customer support, for staff and students
All teachers have tools and devices necessary to create/manage curriculum.
Students, administration, and faculty felt that the curriculum provided information
literacy skills.
Adequate wireless technologies
Large volume of carts, PC’s, iPads, and laptops
Adequate network bandwidth
Student access to accounts and storage
Continual revision and refinement of tools and devices
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Information Resources and Technology Standard. Currently library staff includes 1 certified librarian per 1400 students with 1 full time
teaching assistant. Until 2006, library staffing included 2 full time certified librarians and
.5 secretary.
Projectors are in need of refreshing (failing, non-managed)
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Information Resources
and Technology that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for
Growth and Improvement.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 166 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Wireless network needs refreshed and increased capacity. While notable, this may not
rise to the level of being part of the action plan.
New PCs for areas that can justify upgrade from XP. While notable, this may not rise to
the level of being part of the action plan.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
The information resources and technology plan(s) X
Budget for information resources and technology X
Information skills curriculum X
Policies related to information resources and technology X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 167 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT
s an educational institution, a school needs to give considerable attention to the
quality and comprehensiveness of its curriculum as well as the effectiveness of
the instructional pedagogy and assessment practices used to ensure student
success.
As part of its planning for growth and improvement, the school conducted an in-depth
self-examination of the curriculum, instructional program, and assessment practices for
those components of its educational program that are deemed essential to the areas of
student performance that have been identified as the priorities for growth and
improvement. Using the Middle States Indicators of Quality for Curriculum,
Instruction, and Assessment, this self-assessment required the school to look carefully
at its written curriculum, how the curriculum is delivered to the students, and the
practices used to assess the degree to which the students are achieving the learning
goals of the curriculum.
The overall purpose of this self-assessment is to identify any aspects of the school’s
curriculum, instructional pedagogy, and assessment practices that need to be developed
or improved to increase the likelihood that he school will be able to achieve the goals it
set for growing and improving student performance. Areas identified for development
and/or improvement should be included in the action plans for the measurable student
performance and organizational capacity goals that are the heart of the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
While the Visiting Team does not evaluate the quality of the curricular components
selected for self-assessment, the Team will note those areas the school identified for
development and/or improvement and expects to see those areas addressed in the
action plans.
A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 168 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
Keystone Courses Curriculum
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM
The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education
program meets the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
was conducted by the following process:
X Planning Team Review prior to subcommittee
Name Role in the Institution
Andrew Cook Student, grade 11
Danielle Galbraith Student, grade 11
Maria Melchiorre Student, grade 12
Brett Sopher Student, grade 12
Lauren Tucci Student, grade 11
Kelly Reith Parent
Kathleen Sopher Parent
Kathleen Tucci Parent
Jennifer Swab Parent
Alice Kilroy Parent
Crystal Barr Community Member
Daria White Community Member
Chris Cummings NH Faculty (Math)
Jennifer DiPasquale NH Faculty (Science: biology)
Regina Moorby NH Faculty (GATE and art)
Joseph Warnock NH Faculty (Math)
Missi Marangoni NH faculty (World language: French)
Laura Clark NH faculty (Science)
Sue Batson NH faculty (Science Curriculum Leader)
Jaime DeWeese NH faculty (Social Studies)
Kim Zwicker NH faculty (Special Education)
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 169 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Michael Scarpaci NH faculty (Technology education)
Sandra Miller NH faculty (Library sciences)
Amy Patsilevas NH faculty (Family/Consumer Science)
X Subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher,
parent, student, etc.)
John Kreider Administrator
Bill McGahee Administrator
Ryan Yates Administrator
David Barkovich Dean of Students
Deb Davis School Counselor
Regina Moorby Art Department Curriculum Leader
Leonard Lavelle Music Department Curriculum Leader
Kim Wroblewski Math Department Curriculum Leader
Sue Batson Science Department Curriculum Leader
Peggy Byrnes English Department Curriculum Leader
Jim Cassandro Technology Education Curriculum Leader
Joe Deible World Language Curriculum Leader
Steve Hoza Social Studies Department Curriculum Leader
Matt Demharter Faculty and Bargaining Unit Building Rep.
If the school used a committee to conduct the self-assessment, explain how all of the
school’s community of stakeholders was given opportunities to provide input into
the self-assessment. The first self-assessment of the indicators of quality was conducted by The Planning Team. The
Team was extremely eager to review the 12 Standard reports and quickly concluded that they
were generally positive. The indications are that these twelve standards were being met, but there
is room for growth. A great deal of brainstorming and discussion resulted in a Quality for
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment review that was conducted regarding the Keystone data.
At the next several Planning Team meetings the each of the survey results were openly
discussed, each rating was agreed upon with consensus from the entire Planning Team, and it
began to appear that a student performance objective was developing. The Planning team
conducted all meetings as open discussions that led to almost immediately led to a consensus.
There were no instances of serious disagreement. All indications were that everyone felt
comfortable sharing their opinions and reaching a consensus.
A second committee also met to review the Keystone data self-assessment. This
subcommittee was comprised of building administrators and teacher leaders from each
department and was formed based upon a previously established committee known as “EEC”
(Education Excellence Committee). This standing committee meets each Friday of the school
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 170 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
year and is made up of the high school curriculum leaders and building principals. These
building leaders conveyed the information back to their departments. This subcommittee agreed
with the recommendations of the Planning Team and there were no instances of serious
disagreement. All indications were that everyone felt comfortable sharing their opinions and
reaching a consensus. As this review was geared towards teaching staff, it was not sent to
students, parents or community.
Survey of the school’s stakeholders using the Middle States Survey:
A. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
1. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each column as
described.
Grade Level: Enter the grade level(s) at which each course/program in this curricular
component is taught.
Course Title: List the course/program titles or topics taught (e.g. Language Arts,
English IV, writing, journalism).
Hours per Semester/Year: Indicate the number of hours of instructional time devoted to each
program/ course per semester/year
Grade Level(s)
Course Title
Hours per
Semester/Year
9 Pre-Algebra 120 (Full year)
9 Algebra 1 120 (Full year)
10-12 Keystone Math (remediation) 60 (Semester)
9 Biology 120 (Full year)
9 English 9 120 (Full year)
9 Pre-AP English 9 120 (Full year)
10 Pre-AP English 10 120 (Full year)
10 English 10 120 (Full year)
10-12 Keystone Literature (remediation) 60 (Semester)
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 171 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
X The instructional hours are reported for one academic year
The instructional hours are reported for one academic semester
2. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned. These courses were specifically designed based upon PA Standards, approved by our school’s
Curriculum Council and administration, and have been administered at our school in preparation for the
Keystone Exams since 2013. Because our courses and curriculum have been aligned with state
standards, there are currently are no gaps or omissions in the sequence of courses taught in the high
school. There may be gaps present from elementary to middle school or middle school to high school.
3. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned. N/A. There is no unnecessary repetition. Any repetition of curriculum is done purposefully in the
Keystone remediation courses in order to reinforce subject matter in order to improve student
performance on the next occasion of Keystone testing in that subject area.
4. ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
Name of Assessment/
Test Area(s) Assessed
Level of Student
Performance
S NI U
Keystone Biology Biology X
Keystone Algebra 1 Algebra 1 X
Keystone Literature Language arts and
literature X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 172 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
83%79%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Literature Algebra 1 Biology
Perc
enta
ge R
each
ing P
rofi
cien
cy
Keystone Assessments in 2013-14
Student Assessment Data
Keystone Data FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance
Keystone Exam – Algebra I
All 9-11
17.1 Advanced
26.8 Proficient
43.1 Basic
13.0 Below Basic
Caucasian
9-11 18 Advanced
26.9 Proficient
43.3 Basic
11.8 Below Basic
African-
American
9-11 0 Advanced
19.0 Proficient
57.1 Basic
23.8 Below Basic
Hispanic
9-11 22.2 Advanced
44.4 Proficient
11.1 Basic
22.2 Below Basic
Male 9-11 14.3 Advanced
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 173 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance
24.0 Proficient
45.0 Basic
16.7 Below Basic
Female
9-11 20.3 Advanced
30.0 Proficient
41.0 Basic
8.8 Below Basic
IEP
9-11 17.1 Advanced
4.8 Proficient
57.1 Basic
36.2 Below Basic
English
Language
Learners
9-11 11.1 Advanced
0.0 Proficient
22.2 Basic
66.7 Below Basic
Socially-
Economically
Deprived
9-11 10.3 Advanced
19.0 Proficient
52.9 Basic
17.8 Below Basic
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance18
Keystone Exam – Biology
All
9-11 12.3 Advanced
20.1 Proficient
45.0 Basic
22.6 Below Basic
Caucasian
9-11 12.2 Advanced
19.7 Proficient
46.8 Basic
21.2 Below Basic
African-
American
9-11 4.2 Advanced
33.3 Proficient
18 Insert the names of the appropriate terms used to designate levels of performance on this assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 174 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance18
16.7 Basic
45.8 Below Basic
Hispanic
9-11 28.6 Advanced
14.3 Proficient
14.3 Basic
42.9 Below Basic
Male
9-11 11.2 Advanced
15.4 Proficient
47.4 Basic
26.0 Below Basic
Female
9-11 13.6 Advanced
25.6 Proficient
42.1 Basic
18.6 Below Basic
IEP
9-11 2.8 Advanced
3.8 Proficient
36.8 Basic
56.6 Below Basic
English
Language
Learners
9-11 12.5 Advanced
0.0 Proficient
12.5 Basic
75.0 Below Basic
Socially-
Economically
Deprived
9-11 6.9 Advanced
20.7 Proficient
41.4 Basic
31.0 Below Basic
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance19
Keystone Exam –
Literature All
9-11 4.0 Advanced
48.3 Proficient
37.1 Basic
19 Insert the names of the appropriate terms used to designate levels of performance on this assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 175 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Name of Assessment Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance19
10.6 Below Basic
Caucasian
9-11 4.5 Advanced
49.7 Proficient
35.7 Basic
10.2 Below Basic
African-
American
9-11 0.0 Advanced
33.3 Proficient
55.6 Basic
11.1 Below Basic
Hispanic
9-11 0.0 Advanced
40.0 Proficient
40.0 Basic
20.0 Below Basic
Male
9-11 2.5 Advanced
43.2 Proficient
38.7 Basic
15.6 Below Basic
Female
9-11 6.0 Advanced
55.0 Proficient
34.9 Basic
4.0 Below Basic
IEP
9-11 0.0 Advanced
15.2 Proficient
48.5 Basic
36.4 Below Basic
English
Language
Learners
9-11 0.0 Advanced
0.0 Proficient
25.0 Basic
75.0 Below Basic
Socially-
Economically
Disadvantaged
9-11 2.7 Advanced
31.9 Proficient
49.6 Basic
15.9 Below Basic
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 176 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that need
to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is assigned.
Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
Investigate having all teachers (all subjects) incorporate “Keystone style” multiple choice and
constructed-response questions.
Investigate having all teachers incorporate tier one or tier two vocabulary into lesson design
Investigate smaller class size
Investigate creating Keystone Camp (remedial after-school sessions for identified students.
Continue to offer remediation courses
B. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 177 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill the
stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities, objectives,
and goals for all courses and units within the
program that are based on clearly defined
expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the alignment
of teaching strategies, learning activities,
instructional support, instructional resources, and
assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that promote
students’ critical thinking, reasoning, problem-
solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum address
the diverse learning needs of the students without
compromising the essential knowledge and skills
students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers across
grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level staff
members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful, and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 178 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
X
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
X
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives and
define the scope and sequence of the curriculum.
The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices in, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the
selection of learning materials and media.
X
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development, and
research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of the
curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to be
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 179 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
deleted from the curriculum.
Indicators for Schools That Provide Distance Education
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.21. Students and their families (if appropriate) are
informed about any aspects of the curriculum that
are created or delivered by an organization other
than the school.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CI.22. Stated student performance outcomes for any part
of the curriculum delivered through distance
education are achievable through that
methodology.
X
CI.23. Appropriate study skills necessary for students to
utilize a distance education model effectively and
efficiently are included as part of the curriculum
and instructional process.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
The assessments given to North Hills High School students are used both nationally and
statewide to measure student success.
Administration of these assessments is both carefully planned based upon appropriate
standards, solid instructional pedagogy, and appropriate assessment based on research
and best practices.
Curricular adjustments are regularly made based upon assessment results in order to meet
and address the needs of students and are designed to produce positive results to student
learning at all levels.
Effective policies and practices are in place, along with instructional materials,
technology, and equipment that are appropriate, functional, and well-maintained.
Evidence:
N/A. Evidence is that this standard is being met or exceeded.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 180 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum
are appropriate for the students. X
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes in promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
X
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Indicators for Schools That Provide Distance Education MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 181 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1 2 3 4
II.12. Student interaction (synchronous and
asynchronous) with the faculty and other students
is facilitated through a variety of means as an
essential characteristic of the curriculum.
X
II.13. Instructional materials in the curriculum are
developed by authors qualified in distance
education techniques. Textbooks and other
instructional materials are suitable for distance
learning.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
There is a rush to deliver the large amount of Keystone curriculum, especially in biology.
Time constraints based on this sometimes interfere with the ability to adequately meet the
diverse needs of all students.
We have an outstanding faculty at North Hills, who are very supportive of each other. A factor that presents a challenge is class size. In addition, there is a HUGE need for further
articulation and cooperation between high school and middle school teachers. Not every faculty member in each subject area is aware of how they might contribute to
higher student performance in these areas.
Evidence:
N/A. Evidence is that this standard is being met or exceeded
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 182 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
a. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for cohorts
of students as they move through courses in the
curriculum.
X
b Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
comparable (local, state, and national) groups
outside of the school.
X
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
X
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrolment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
X
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 183 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Given our make-up, our students perform really well.
Variety of assessments to address cognitive learning styles within assessments
Too much standardized testing (over testing the students)
Return to testing days?
Use motivational videos to enhance importance of high stake tests and to raise morale of
entire building environment
Common planning time with teachers of same content/grade level
Evidence:
N/A. Evidence is that this Indicator of Quality is being met or exceeded
C. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS N/A. Evidence is that this standard is being met or exceeded
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational program
made within the past five years.
Adjustments in the course selection process to involve teacher recommendations of courses
based on the students’ current and past performance. The creation of our school’s own online Keystone remediation coursework based on the current
curriculum. This was done to create greater access to remediation during the summer and to
allow students attending our career and technical center to remain in their program while still
receiving remediation.
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the educational
program.
The curriculum and assessments provided to North Hills High School students are
based on sound practice and are used to provide a high quality instruction.
Administration of this curriculum and these assessments is both carefully planned
based upon appropriate standards, solid instructional pedagogy, and appropriate
assessment based on research and best practices.
Curricular adjustments are regularly made based upon assessment results in order to
meet and address the needs of students and are designed to produce positive results
to student learning at all levels.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 184 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Effective policies and practices are in place, along with instructional materials,
technology, and equipment that are appropriate, functional, and well-maintained.
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of the
educational program.
Students are assessed using a wide variety of methods across their k-12 education and across
different subject matters. This creates challenges at each level as students must adjust to
new instructional techniques based upon new Our high school has an increasing population of economically disadvantaged students, who
traditionally do not perform as well on standardized tests. Steps should be made to address
the needs of these learners.
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important next
steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational program that
should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
An examination of how each curricular area can assist with preparing students in these
Keystone areas should be undertaken.
An examination of ways in which to address higher class size in these Keystone areas
should be undertaken.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 185 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PLAN FOR GROWTH AND IMPROVEMENT
he culminating activity of the Excellence by Design self-study and planning
process is the development of a Plan for Growth and Improvement in student
performance and the school’s capacity to produce the levels of student
performance it desires and that are expected by its community of stakeholders.
The heart of the Plan for Growth and Improvement is composed of:
The three, four, or five areas of student performance and organizational capacity
the Planning Team has identified as most in need of growth and improvement,
The measurable objectives that have been developed to address those needs, and
The action plans the school will implement to achieve its objectives.
A. STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL
CAPACITY OBJECTIVES
The centerpiece of the school's Plan for Growth and Improvement is formed by the
three, four, or five areas of measurable objectives the school has identified as being the
highest priorities for growth and improvement if the school is to move closer to
achieving its Mission. At least two of the objectives must focus on areas of student
performance that have been determined to be priorities for growth and improvement.
The remaining one, two, or three objectives may be either student performance
objectives and/or objectives focused on growing and improving the school's
organizational capacity to produce the levels of student performance desired and
expected by the school's community of stakeholders. Space is provided below to
evaluate the maximum number of objectives. This limited number of objectives is
suggested so the school can focus on the most critical aspects of student performance
without diverting its energies in too many directions.
To identify these priority areas, the Planning Team asked itself:
What are the gaps between what we say in our Profile of Graduates regarding
what we want our graduates to know, be able to do, and/or what qualities we
want them to demonstrate and our students’ actual performance in those areas?
Which of these gaps constitute the highest priorities for narrowing if we are to
move closer over the next seven years to achieving our mission?
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 186 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Are there area of our organization's capacity the must be improved in order to
improve our students' performance to the levels we desire and expect
Specifying clear and measurable student performance objectives identifies the school's
commitment to achieve specific end results and thus, is tied directly to accountability.
The objectives must be written in such a way that they outline growth in student
performance for the next seven years and represent a major focus for growth and
improvement in student performance in the school. The objectives should be consistent
with the mission and should extend and define the aim portion of the mission in more
specific detail. Objectives explicate in measurable terms the key end results that the
school seeks to realize from its mission, as expresses in its Profile of Graduates. Not
only should the objectives be related to the school's mission, but where there is also a
district or system plan, the objectives should be linked to one or more of the district’s or
system’s objectives.
The term “student performance” is intended to be defined in the broadest possible
terms. The objectives submitted for accreditation may be focused on any of the
outcomes expected of students as stated in the Profile of Graduates.
Upon reviewing the results of the subcommittee’s input into the Indicators, the Planning Team
met to transform the findings into objectives. As a starting points, a Google Doc was used to
gather suggestions for objectives as they relate to the Mission, Vision, and Profile of Students
from stakeholders. Examples of responses are below. They were combined, condensed, and
transformed into the three objectives that were approved in the Technical Review.
Overall High School enrollment percentage in World Language will maintain or increase its percentage.
By the year 2021, 100% of North Hills students enrolled in the arts will increase critical thinking skills, (self guided, self-disciplined thinking, and improving reasoning abilities) as demonstrated in the classroom assessments and AP Scores.
Students will willingly and actively participate in the various activities offered in the PE Curriculum.
Promote Responsible Citizenship
Each year the percentage of advanced and proficient students will increase on the 10th grade Keystone Literature exam.
By the year 2021, North Hills High School students will demonstrate school spirit, citizenship and community connections by increasing participation in extra-curricular activities and clubs by 5%, by increasing participation in service organization or community-building activities by
5%, and by increasing participation in school sports and sport clubs by 5%.
Improve/Increase student and teacher access/use of relevant technology.
To make more students aware of career choices related to Applied Technologies fields
By the year 2021, 100% of North Hills students will achieve proficient or advanced ratings prior to graduation on the Keystone Biology
assessment.
By the year 2021, 100% of the Technology Education students will incorporate the 1 to 1 initiative as demonstrated by the use during classroom
activities and assessments.
All students enrolled in World Language will complete a differentiated final assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 187 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
By the year 2021, 85% of North Hills students will increase participation in college and career exploration as demonstrated by participation in
college and career related activities such as guest speakers, apprenticeships, college fairs, etc.
Planning and implementing an individualized fitness plan helps to develop a solid foundation of knowledge and skills that impacts wellness
throughout a lifetime.
Improve reading strategies and comprehension skills across high school curriculum
Each year the percentage of advanced and proficient students will increase on the 11th grade Keystone Literature exam retakes.
By 2021, 100% of North Hills students will complete 10 hours of career and college planning activities as demonstrate by completion of an
electronic portfolio.
Increase the number of credits that graduating students have taken
Digital Citizenship: Teaching students in the importance of using technology responsibly.
By the year 2021, there will be an increase in the percentage of North Hills students who achieve a score of 3 or higher on AP Exams.
By the year 2021, 100% of the Technology Education students will utilize STEM-related technology and equipment (3D printers, laser engravers,
plotters, CNC mill, etc.) as demonstrated through their classroom projects.
Teachers will offer opportunities for cultural connection extension.
By the year 2021, 80% of North Hills students will increase participation in community service related activities as demonstrated by participation
data.
To offer a service learning lifeguarding course for PE credit in which students would earn certification in lifeguarding, CPR and First Aid for the professional rescuer.
Promoting a culturally diverse, welcoming and supportive school environment
Each year ninth grade students will demonstrate reading skills growth through Keystone-aligned assessments.
By 2021, additional nursing, special ed, and full time social worker faculty at High school in order to reduce caseload efforts.
Increase Keystone Exam scores
With DARE programs being eliminated district wide, high school students in the SADD club will create a program to be presented to every 6th
grader in each of the 4 elementary schools
By the year 2021, an increased number of students will select courses that emphasize STEAM concepts through interdisciplinary studies.
By the year 2021, 100% of the Technology Education students will have the opportunity to develop advanced programming skills through the
implementation of curriculum, equipment and software as demonstrated by the available courses.
By the year 2021, there will be a 25% increase in the number of North Hills students that successfully complete online courses.
Increase National Merit and AP Scholars
Increasing enrollment in CHS Nutrition and Nutrition, Food and Fitness courses will provide students with an opportunity to learn healthy lifestyle habits that will affect their overall health and wellbeing across the lifespan
By the year 2021, North Hills will see an increase in daily attendance.
By the year 2021, 100 % of Technology Education students will work in a lab environment that is safe, clean and aesthetically pleasing which
parallels the 21st century industry standards as demonstrated in our current curriculum proposal.
Increase percent of students taking college level classes
By the year 2021, student enrollment in STEAM-related AP courses will increase.
By the year 2021, 100 % of Technology Education students will have the opportunity attend career awareness events (Trades Fair, speaker from
the PIA, speakers from PTI, etc.), competitions and by being mentored by the staff members for career guidance.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 188 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 189 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 190 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 191 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Based upon these responses, the prior information, and several weeks of deliberation and
research, the Planning Team created a final draft of the objectives. This Technical Review was
forwarded to the MSA-CESS Accreditation Officer on March 11, 2015. The Internal
Coordinators received the confirmation that the Technical Review had been reviewed on March
17, 2015 and that only minor changes needed. Dr. Barkovich had a quite enjoyable 45 minute
telephone conference with Dr. David Molinari, the Accreditation Officer, on Marcy 19, 2015.
The Internal Coordinators did make the required revisions and resubmitted the Technical Review
on March 23, 2015. The final draft was approved that same day and was distributed to the
Planning Team. It was suggested by team members that these should be distributed to the faculty
at the April 1, 2015 high school faculty meeting given the importance and excitement over this
approval. Both drafts of the Technical Review can be found in the appendix.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 192 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.1. Student Performance Objective #1:
Student Performance Objective #1:
By the year 2022, North Hills High School students will demonstrate improvement as engaged
learners in their acquisition of content knowledge and performance skills in core demographic
areas as defined by the NCLB as measured by:
93% of students will demonstrate that they have reached the “Proficient” or “Advanced”
level on the literature local assessment by the conclusion of their 11th
grade year (as
defined by 9th
grade cohort).
The baseline from the 2013 – 2014 academic school year indicates that the
percentage of North Hills High School students that had reached proficiency or
higher on the literature local assessment by the conclusion of their 11th
grade year
was 83%.
This goal of 93% represents the current percentage of 83% as well as an
additional 10% of students reaching proficiently on the literature local
assessment.
As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal of increasing the proficiency rate by 10%
represents that approximately 35 more students in each cohort will reach this
mark.
Please note that in 2015, the literature local assessment is the Pennsylvania
Keystone Literature Exam and reaching “Proficient” or “Advanced” is required
for a student’s high school graduation. It is possible that legislation on the state-
wide level may necessitate a change in literature assessment measurements, but
any changes that need to be made because of the state-wide changes will adhere
as closely as possible to this current objective as stated in 2015.
89% of students will demonstrate that they have reached the “Proficient” or “Advanced”
level on the algebra 1 local assessment by the conclusion of their 11th
grade year (as
defined by 9th
grade cohort).
The baseline from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North Hills
High School students that had reached proficiency on the algebra 1 local
assessment by the conclusion of their 11th
grade year was 79%.
This goal of 89% represents the current percentage of 79% as well as an
additional 10% of students reaching proficiently on the algebra 1 local
assessment.
As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal of increasing the proficiency rate by 10%
represents that approximately 35 more students in each cohort will reach this
mark.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 193 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Please note that in 2015, the algebra 1 local assessment is the Pennsylvania
Keystone Algebra 1 Exam and reaching “Proficient” or “Advanced” is required
for a student’s high school graduation. It is possible that legislation on the state-
wide level may necessitate a change in the algebra 1 assessment measurements,
but any changes that need to be made because of the state-wide changes will
adhere as closely as possible to this current objective as stated in 2015.
70% of students will demonstrate that they have reached the “Proficient” or “Advanced”
level on the biology local assessment by the conclusion of their 11th
grade year (as
defined by 9th
grade cohort).
The baseline from the 2013 – 2014 academic school year indicates that the
percentage of North Hills High School students that had reached proficiency on
the biology local assessment by the conclusion of their 11th
grade year was 50%.
This goal of 70% represents the current percentage of 50% as well as an
additional 20% of students reaching proficiently on the biology local assessment.
As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal of increasing the proficiency rate by 20%
represents that approximately 70 more students in each cohort will reach this
mark.
Please note that in 2015, the biology local assessment is the Pennsylvania
Keystone Biology Exam and reaching “Proficient” or “Advanced” is required for
a student’s high school graduation. It is possible that legislation on the state-wide
level may necessitate a change in the biology assessment measurements, but any
changes that need to be made because of the state-wide changes will adhere as
closely as possible to this current objective as stated in 2015.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 194 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
83%79%
50%
93%89%
70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Literature Algebra 1 Biology
Per
cen
tag
e R
each
ing
Pro
fici
ency
Local Assessments
Student Assessment Data
Baseline: 2013-14
Goal: 2021-22
Please note that the Keystone exams and the associated requirements for high school graduation
are relatively new assessments and that the requirements for school districts are regularly revised
by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Department of Education. North Hills High School is
managing these revisions as they are communicated. A strategy related to this performance
objective that is being developed is an in-depth examination of these Keystone scores. This
examination will disaggregate the data using the following variables so that specific
interventions can be created for each population.
Proficiency rate of students classified as economically disadvantaged (via participation in
Free/Reduced Lunch Program) vs. those who are not so identified
Proficiency rate of students participating in a career and technical center (CTC) program
vs. those who do not
Proficiency rate of students that have been identified with learning disabilities vs. those
who are not so identified
Keystone related course grade data and pass rate as compared to actual Keystone test
scores
Gender
Race
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 195 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2 Student Performance Objective #2: By the year 2022, North Hills High School students will successfully pursue a variety of
appropriate post-secondary options as measured by:
96% of students will graduate with their grade level cohort.
92% of students graduating will pursue post-secondary education (of any type).
The average SAT score of 11th
grade students who have taken this college entrance exam
will be 1546 across three testing areas.
7% students or less will require repetition of a course required for graduation.
Specifically:
96% of students will graduate with their grade level cohort.
o The baseline data from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North
Hills High School students graduating with their grade level cohort was 92.1%.
o This goal of 96% represents the baseline percentage of 92.1% as well as an
additional 3.9%.
o As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal of increasing the graduation rate by 3.9%
represents that approximately 14 more students in each cohort will reach this
mark.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 196 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
92% of students graduating will pursue post-secondary education (of any type).
o The baseline data from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North
Hills High School students pursuing post-secondary education was 90%.
o This goal of 92% represents the baseline percentage of 90% as well as an
additional 2%.
o As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal of increasing the percentage pursuing post-
secondary education by 2% represents that approximately 7 more students in each
cohort will reach this mark.
o Please note that post-secondary education is a broad category that includes
matriculation to a college or university, community college, business and
technical schools, military enlistment, and enrollment into and technical
apprenticeship or trade program.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 197 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The average SAT score of 11th
grade students who have taken this college entrance exam
will be 1546 across three testing areas.
o The baseline data from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the average SAT score of
North Hills High School student in 11th
grade was 1541 across three testing areas.
o This average score goal represents the current average score of 11th
grade students
of 1538 as well an increase of 8 points across three testing areas for a new average
score of 1546.
o Please note that The College Board is redesigning the SATs for the 2015 test
administration and this may feature scoring changes. Any changes that need to be
made will adhere as closely as possible to this current objective as stated in 2015.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 198 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
7% students or less will require repetition of a course required for graduation.
o The baseline data from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North
Hills High School students requiring repetition of a course required for graduation
was 9.4%.
o This goal of 7% represents the current percentage of 9.4 % and as well as a
decrease of 2.4%.
o This goal of decreasing this number by 2.4% indicates that approximately 9 more
students in each cohort will not have to retake these courses.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 199 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3 Organizational Capacity Objective #1: By the year 2022, North Hills High School will develop systematic methods of tracking,
addressing any identified deficits, and measuring the positive impact of strategies relating to
positive school participation, attendance, interactions as measured by:
Methods will be developed that encourage 90% of students in grades 9-12 will
voluntarily participate in school sponsored extra-curricular clubs or sports of their
choosing.
The baseline data from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North
Hills High School students voluntarily participating in school sponsored extra-
curricular clubs or sports of their choosing was 80%. This baseline data was
determined through significant effort, as no infrastructure for managing this data
currently exists in 2015. It is very hard to determine who is participating in which
activity or sport.
This goal of 90% represents the current percentage of 80% as well as an
additional 10% of students.
This increase of 10% by 2022 represents approximately 145 students of the total
student body of approximately 1450.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 200 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Methods will be developed that encourage 95% of students in grades 9-12 (as defined by
9th
grade cohort) to have fewer than ten unexcused absences.
The baseline from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North Hills
High School students with fewer than 10 unexcused absences was 91%.
This goal would increase the current percentages of 91% by 4% to no less than
95%.
As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal indicates that approximately 14 more
students in each cohort will to have less than 10 absences. This would be
approximately 56 students in grades 9-12.
Currently, disaggregate data relating to absences is not available. As part of this
objective, systematic methods of tracking, addressing any identified populations,
and measuring the positive impact of strategies will be developed.
Note that prior to 2012-13 our school was a 10-12 school building and underwent
significant organizational changes to become a 9-12 school building. Therefore
only baseline data from the two previous school years was evaluated.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 201 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Methods will be develop so that no more than 24% of students in grades 9-12 will have
administrator contact for violations of school policy (any).
The baseline from the 2013 – 2014 indicates that the percentage of North Hills
High School students were referred to the administration for violations of school
policy was 29%.
This goal would reduce the current percentage of 29% by 5% to a total of no more
than 24%.
As each graduating cohort of North Hills High School is comprised of
approximately 350 students, this goal indicates that approximately 14 less
students in each cohort will to have contact regarding a policy violation.
Currently, disaggregate data relating to discipline is not readily available. As part
of this objective, systematic methods of tracking, addressing any identified
populations, and measuring the positive impact of strategies will be developed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 202 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. ACTION PLANS Action plans describe the methods the school will use to accomplish its
mission/philosophy and its performance/capacity objectives. Action plans provide
detailed descriptions of the specific actions required to achieve desired results outlined
in the student performance improvement and organizational capacity objectives. This is
the “doing” part of the plan. Action plans can and should include multiple activities
that will engage the school in improvement activities for the next seven years. Action
plans should be specific and tell in detail how the school will accomplish its objectives.
Action plans should relate directly to the objectives, but they also should be related to
the mission/philosophy.
Action Plans After the two performance objectives and the organizational capacity were formed the following
data collection tool was sent to all stakeholders in order to obtain feedback regarding the best
methods of meeting these goals.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 203 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 204 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 205 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Please see the Action Plan Attachments at the conclusion of this document.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 206 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
North Hills High School Middle States Action Plans
2015-2022 Student Performance Objective #1:
Action Planning Team 1: Ryan Yates (administrator), Jen Dipasquale, Joe Warnock, Lisa Palmieri, Chris Cummings (faculty), Kelly Reith (parent)
By the year 2022, North Hills High School students will demonstrate improvement as engaged learners in their acquisition of content
knowledge and performance skills in core demographic areas as defined by the NCLB as measured by:
Objective 1A: 93% of students will demonstrate that they have reached the “Proficient” or “Advanced” level on the literature local assessment
by the conclusion of their 11th grade year (as defined by 9th grade cohort).
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Develop methods through
which teachers from every
subject will integrate
"Keystone style" multiple
choice and constructed-
response questions. The
priority will be in grades 9
and 10.
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Keystone
data, PD
trainer
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Faculty training on
how to word
questions, how to
create rubrics to score
questions, and how to
score constructed-
response questions
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 207 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 2: Develop methods through
which teachers from every
subject will integrate
teachers will incorporate tier
one and tier two vocabulary
into lesson designs. The
priority will be in grades 9
and 10.
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Keystone
data, PD
trainer,
Common
Core
vocabulary
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiently
pass rate
In
development
Faculty training on
how to word
questions, how to
create rubrics to score
questions, and how to
score constructed-
response questions
Strategy 3: Investigate small class sizes
(20 students or less) in
Keystone-related classes
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Dependent on
staffing
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
None
Strategy 4: Investigation of new
curricular resources in 9th
and 10th grade English
classes to focus on key skills
needed for success on the
Keystone Literature test
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Unlocking
the Keystone
Exam:
Literature,
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiently
pass rate
In
development
Professional
development days for
faculty or summer
curriculum writing to
plan activities and
lessons
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 208 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 5: Use of CDT testing and
testing data to assess
students' strengths and
weaknesses, adjustment of
classroom instruction to
address these needs
Curriculum leaders
and classroom
teachers
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
CDT Test
scores,
technology
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Professional
development days for
faculty or summer
curriculum writing to
plan activities and
lessons
Strategy 6: Continuation of remediation
courses for students that
have not been successful on
the Keystone Exam
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
Ongoing Current
faculty,
technology,
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In progress None at this time
Strategy 7: Creation of "Keystone
Camp", a remedial after-
school tutoring sessions for
sophomores demonstrating
low achievement
Building
administration,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
implementation
year, then
annually each
April & May in
weeks prior to
Keystone test
Keystone
data, CDT
data, practice
tests,
Unlocking
the Keystone
Exam:
Literature
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 209 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Objective 1B: 89% of students will demonstrate that they have reached the “Proficient” or “Advanced” level on the Algebra 1 local assessment
by the conclusion of their 11th grade year (as defined by 9th grade cohort).
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Develop methods through
which teachers from every
subject will integrate
"Keystone style" multiple
choice and constructed-
response questions. The
priority will be in grades 9
and 10.
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Keystone
data, PD
trainer
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiently
pass rate
In
development
Faculty training on
how to word
questions, how to
create rubrics to score
questions, and how to
score constructed-
response questions
Strategy 2: Develop methods through
which teachers from every
subject will integrate
teachers will incorporate tier
one and tier two vocabulary
into lesson designs. The
priority will be in grades 9
and 10.
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Keystone
data, PD
trainer,
Common
Core
vocabulary
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Faculty training on
how to word
questions, how to
create rubrics to score
questions, and how to
score constructed-
response questions
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 210 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 3: Investigate small class sizes
(20 students or less) in
Keystone-related classes
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Dependent on
staffing
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiently
pass rate
In
development
None
Strategy 4: Investigation of new
curricular resources in 9th
and 10th grade English
classes to focus on key skills
needed for success on the
Keystone Literature test
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Unlocking
the Keystone
Exam:
Literature,
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Professional
development days for
faculty or summer
curriculum writing to
plan activities and
lessons
Strategy 5: Use of CDT testing and
testing data to assess
students' strengths and
weaknesses, adjustment of
classroom instruction to
address these needs
Curriculum leaders
and classroom
teachers
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
CDT Test
scores,
technology
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Professional
development days for
faculty or summer
curriculum writing to
plan activities and
lessons
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 211 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 6: Continuation of remediation
courses for students that
have not been successful on
the Keystone Exam
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
Ongoing Current
faculty,
technology,
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In progress None at this time
Strategy 7: Creation of "Keystone
Camp", a remedial after-
school tutoring sessions for
sophomores demonstrating
low achievement
Building
administration,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
implementation
year, then
annually each
April & May in
weeks prior to
Keystone test
Keystone
data, CDT
data, practice
tests,
Unlocking
the Keystone
Exam:
Literature
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 212 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Objective 1C: 89% of students will demonstrate that they have reached the “Proficient” or “Advanced” level on the biology local assessment by
the conclusion of their 11th grade year (as defined by 9th grade cohort).
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Develop methods through
which teachers from every
subject will integrate
"Keystone style" multiple
choice and constructed-
response questions. The
priority will be in grades 9
and 10.
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Keystone
data, PD
trainer
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Faculty training on
how to word
questions, how to
create rubrics to score
questions, and how to
score constructed-
response questions
Strategy 2: Develop methods through
which teachers from every
subject will integrate
teachers will incorporate tier
one and tier two vocabulary
into lesson designs. The
priority will be in grades 9
and 10.
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Keystone
data, PD
trainer,
Common
Core
vocabulary
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Faculty training on
how to word
questions, how to
create rubrics to score
questions, and how to
score constructed-
response questions
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 213 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 3: Investigate small class sizes
(20 students or less) in
Keystone-related classes
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Dependent on
staffing
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
None
Strategy 4: Investigation of new
curricular resources in 9th
and 10th grade English
classes to focus on key skills
needed for success on the
Keystone Literature test
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Unlocking
the Keystone
Exam:
Literature,
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Professional
development days for
faculty or summer
curriculum writing to
plan activities and
lessons
Strategy 5: Use of CDT testing and
testing data to assess
students' strengths and
weaknesses, adjustment of
classroom instruction to
address these needs
Curriculum leaders
and classroom
teachers
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
CDT Test
scores,
technology
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
Professional
development days for
faculty or summer
curriculum writing to
plan activities and
lessons
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 214 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 6: Continuation of remediation
courses for students that
have not been successful on
the Keystone Exam
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
Ongoing Current
faculty,
technology,
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In progress None at this time
Strategy 7: Creation of "Keystone
Camp", a remedial after-
school tutoring sessions for
sophomores demonstrating
low achievement
Building
administration,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
implementation
year, then
annually each
April & May in
weeks prior to
Keystone test
Keystone
data, CDT
data, practice
tests,
Unlocking
the Keystone
Exam:
Literature
increases in #
of correct
answers on
Keystone
exams and/or
proficiency
pass rate
In
development
None at this time
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 215 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Student Performance Objective #2: Action Planning Team 2: Sandy Miller, Chris Cummings, Mike Scarpaci, Kim Zwicker, Sue Batson (faculty members), Maria Melchiorre, Andrew Cook (students), Alice Kilroy (parent)
By the year 2022, North Hills High School students will successfully pursue a variety of appropriate post-secondary options as measured by:
Student Performance Objective 2A: 96% of students will graduate with their grade level cohort.
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Disaggregate the graduation
rate data in order to target
populations with a greater
chance of not graduating by
the following (Example:
Whether student attended
NH 9-12, special education
students, etc.)
Building
administrators,
school counselors
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
graduate rate
of grade level
cohort
In development None
Strategy 2: Investigate re-instating a
tutoring program, either
peer-to-peer, or utilizing
teachers (possibly during
lunch periods in cafeteria)
Administrators,
teachers,
department heads
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Teachers,
cafe space
Increase in
graduate rate
of grade level
cohort
In development None
Strategy 3: Examining limiting students
ability to participate in work
release privilege if in
academic danger
Building
administrators,
school counselors,
parents
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
graduate rate
of grade level
cohort
In development None
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 216 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 4: Examine student failure data
in order to improve class
placement process; including
examining pre-requisites
Explore adjusting pre-
requisites to maximize
appropriate placement
Building
administrators,
counselors,
curriculum
leaders, faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
graduate rate
of grade level
cohort
In development None
Strategy 5: Examining offer free
summer remediation classes
in Keystone areas
Central
administration,
building
administration, ,
technology staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Funding for
summer
online tuition
Increase in
graduate rate
of grade level
cohort
In development None
Strategy 8: Re-institute homeroom
period from 7:20-7:38am so
that cohort has time to
interact and create
connections.
Building
administration,
support staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
graduate rate
of cohort
In development Strategy 8:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 217 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Student Performance Objective 2B: 92% of students graduating will pursue post-secondary education (of any type).
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Explore methods of
increasing awareness of
school counseling
department and Counseling
Resource Center CRC.
School counselors,
building
administrators
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
percentage of
students
pursuing
post-
secondary
education
In development None
Strategy 2: Explore methods of
increasing student
exploration of fields relating
to the trades and
manufacturing, including
participation in
apprenticeships and trades as
careers;
CTC staff, school
counselors,
building
administration,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Increase in
percentage of
students
pursuing
post-
secondary
education
In development None
Strategy 3: Develop method of offering
alumni speaker series for a
variety of career areas
Building
administrators,
counselors,
curriculum
leaders, faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Increase in
percentage of
students
pursuing
post-
secondary
education
In development None
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 218 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 4: Explore better promotion of
job shadowing and
internship opportunities
Building
administrators,
counselors,
curriculum
leaders, faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Consultation
with attorney
regarding
liability
Increase in
percentage of
students
pursuing
post-
secondary
education
In development PD for school
counselors on
managing job
shadowing/
internships
Strategy 5: Explore methods in
involving faculty in college
exploration process.
Building
administrators,
counselors,
curriculum
leaders, faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Increase in
percentage of
students
pursuing
post-
secondary
education
In development PD for faculty on
establishing
relevance to subject
topic
Strategy 8: Re-institute homeroom
period from 7:20-7:38am so
that school counselors can
deliver developmentally
appropriate information to
grade levels by homeroom.
Building
administration,
support staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Percentage
increase in
students
pursuing
post-
secondary
education.
In development
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 219 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Student Performance Objective 2C: 7% students will require repetition of a course required for graduation
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Investigate re-instating a
tutoring program, either
peer-to-peer, or utilizing
teachers (possibly during
lunch periods in cafeteria)
Central
administration,
building principals
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
PD training Decrease in
the number of
students
requiring
course
repetition.
In development None
Strategy 2: Explore methods of
providing the tools for
success to all students
(example: Calculators)
School board,
central
administration,
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Funding for
calculators
for each
student
Decrease in
the number of
students
requiring
course
repetition.
In development None
Strategy 3: Explore establishing a
mentor program for at risk
students.
Building
administrators,
counselors,
curriculum
leaders, faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
students
requiring
course
repetition.
In development PD for staff
regarding mentoring
programs
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 220 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 4: Examine student failure data
in order to improve class
placement process; including
examining pre-requisites
Explore adjusting pre-
requisites to maximize
appropriate placement
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Decrease in
the number of
students
requiring
course
repetition.
In development None
Strategy 5: Explore methods of
improving communication
with parents of at-risk
students
Building
administrators,
counselors,
curriculum
leaders, faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
referrals to
building
principals
In development PD for faculty
regarding best
practices in
communication
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 221 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Organizational Capacity Objective #1: Action Planning Team 3:Kevin Deitrick, Chelle Zimmerman (administrators), Missi Marangoni, Jamie DeWeese, Amy Patsilevas, Regina Moorby
(faculty members), Lauren Tucci, Brett Sopher (students), Jen Swab, Kathleen Tucci, Kathleen Sopher (parents)
By the year 2022, North Hills High School will develop systematic methods of tracking, addressing any identified deficits, and measuring the
positive impact of strategies relating to positive school participation, attendance, interactions as measured by:
Organizational Capacity Objective 1A: Methods will be developed that encourage 90% of students in grades 9-12 will voluntarily participate in
school sponsored extra-curricular clubs or sports of their choosing.
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Examine methods of
identifying students who are
not participating in activities
and discovering what barriers
might exist to their
participation
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
school counselors,
club sponsors
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Full list of all
activities,
sports, and
intramurals
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
None
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 222 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 2: Examine whether
transportation is a barrier to
activity participation. If so,
consider running an after
school activity bus or
permitting high school
students to take middle
school buses home.
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
school counselors,
club sponsors
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Funding for
activity bus,
Full list of all
activities,
sports, and
intramurals
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
None
Strategy 3: Examine benefits and costs
of adding activity period on a
weekly, bi-weekly, or
monthly basis.
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Dependent on
staffing
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
None
Strategy 4: Examine expanding after
school intramurals offerings
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
school counselors,
club sponsors
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Full list of all
activities,
sports, and
intramurals
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
None
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 223 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 5: Conduct survey of students
to determine if there is
student interest in other
activities.
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Full list of all
activities,
sports, and
intramurals
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
None
Strategy 6: Develop methods of better
communicating variety of
activities to students,
including how meetings are
advertised during the
morning announcements,
how parents are informed of
activities, adding the list to
the Program of Studies and
adding the ability to note
interest in activities during
course selection process
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Full list of all
activities,
sports, and
intramurals
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
Exploration of best
practices in parent
communication
Strategy 7: Develop methods of bridging
with middle school/high
school activities, including
an activity fair at the end of
8th grade
Athletic director,
activities
coordinator,
building
administration,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
Full list of all
activities,
sports, and
intramurals
Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 224 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 8: Re-institute homeroom
period from 7:20-7:38am so
that club and sports have a
time to meet.
Building
administration,
support staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development
Organizational Capacity Objective 1B: Methods will be developed that encourage 95% of students in grades 9-12 (as defined by 9th grade
cohort) to have fewer than ten unexcused absences.
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Examine implementation of
an on-line excuse system by
which the parents can send
the excuse electronically.
Central
administration,
building
administration,
support staff,
technology staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
students with
10 or more
excused
absences
In
development
None
Strategy 2: Examine implementation of
reward system for students
demonstrating positive
attendance practices
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
students with
10 or more
excused
absences
In
development
None
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 225 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 3: Examine strengthening
and/or clarifying school
board policies that relate to
attendance and how it could
be linked to participation in
school sports and activities,
parking passes, and/or the
ability make-up course work
School board,
central
administration,
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Decrease in
the number of
students with
10 or more
excused
absences
In
development
None
Strategy 4: Examine methods of
communicating negative
benefits of absenteeism to
students parents/guardians
Building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty’s school
counselors
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Decrease in
the number of
students with
10 or more
excused
absences
In
development
Training on best
practices and methods
of dealing with
truancy and
absenteeism
Strategy 5: Re-institute homeroom
period from 7:20-7:38am so
that students can attend
tutoring and support services,
adding value to being on
time each day.
Building
administration,
support staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Increase in
the total
percentage of
student
involved in
extra-
curricular
clubs or
sports
In
development Strategy 8:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 226 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Organizational Capacity Objective 1C: Methods will be develop so that no more than 24% of students in grades 9-12 will have administrator
contact for violations of school policy (any).
Action Steps Person/ Group (s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status Professional
Development Needs
Strategy 1: Offer additional classroom
management training to all
faculty, administration and
staff
Central
administration,
building principals
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
PD training Decrease in
the number of
referrals to
building
principals
In
development
Faculty training on
classroom
management
Strategy 2: Examine strengthening
and/or clarifying school
board policies and how
consequences could be
linked to participation in
school sports and activities,
parking passes, and/or the
ability make-up course work
School board,
central
administration,
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Decrease in
the number of
referrals to
building
principals
In
development
None
Strategy 3: Examine implementation of
reward system for students
demonstrating positive
behaviors
Assistant
Superintendent for
curriculum,
building
principals,
curriculum leaders,
faculty
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
students with
10 or more
excused
absences
In
development
None
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 227 Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy 4: Examine current policies that
result in the most frequent
discipline referrals and
develop strategies for
targeting behaviors.
Building principal,
school counselors,
curriculum leaders
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD Decrease in
the number of
referrals to
building
principals
In
development
None
Strategy 5: Examine current
security/cameras to
determine if they provide
sufficient information for
resolving discipline referrals
Curriculum leaders
and classroom
teachers
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
referrals to
building
principals
In
development
None
Strategy 6: Exploration of formal
career/college plan, including
goal setting, measuring
progress, and communication
with stakeholders
School counselors,
curriculum leaders,
building principals
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2023
TBD,
possibly
including
additional
funding for
initiative
Decrease in
the number of
referrals to
building
principals
In
development
None
Strategy 7: Re-institute homeroom
period from 7:20-7:38am so
that students have time to
acclimate in the mornings
with developmental peers.
Building
administration,
support staff
2015-16 as
development year
with 2016-17
implementation
through 2022
None Decrease in
the number of
referrals
In
development Strategy 8: