exceptional bora outbreak in winter 2012: validation and analysis … · high-resolution...
TRANSCRIPT
06 – 10 October 2014 14th EMS Annual Meeting
Exceptional Bora outbreak in winter 2012: validation and analysis of
high-resolution atmospheric model simulations in the northern Adriatic area
Silvio Davolio, Paolo Stocchi – CNR ISAC (Bologna) Sandro Carniel, Alvise Benetazzo – CNR ISMAR (Venice)
Emanuele Bohm – CNR ISAC (Roma) Mariangela Ravaioli, Francesco Riminucci – CNR ISMAR (Bologna)
XiaoMing Li – RADI CAS (Beijing)
OUTLINE Framework and motivation The Bora event of winter 2012 in the northern Adriatic Modelling tools and available observations Modelling results
- validation: meteorological variables of interest for oceanographic applications - analysis of the meteorological event (heavy snowfall)
Conclusions
This study is undertaken in the framework of the Italian Project “RITMARE” coordinated by the National Research Council (CNR), within WP4 “Coastal Oceanographic Modelling” whose aim is to implement meteorological, oceanic and wave numerical models in order to attain a better understanding and representation of the main processes in the coastal zone and of their interactions.
Deep Water Outflow Current
Target area: northern Adriatic Sea, a region often affected by Bora winds, producing relevant air-sea exchange which in turn impacts the Adriatic circulation, triggering dense water formation processes. Suitable “laboratory”
The exceptional Bora event of winter 2012 is very interesting from both: - meteorological perspective - oceanographic perspective - air-sea exchange perspective and has been selected as case study for validation of NWP models. Aim: - Assess the capability of our NWP model chain of reproducing the Bora event and associated phenomena (snowfall, fluxes, etc.) - Assess the impact of using different initial/boundary conditions (from Global models) to drive the NWP chain - Evaluate the impact of different SST initialization
MOLOCH forecast +33 h
NWP models sometimes do not evolve SST during short-range forecasts, assuming it is a slowly varying variable. However it may be unrealistic in a small and shallow basin like the Adriatic Sea, during particular meteorological events such as Bora.
Bora event: 29 January – 13 February 2012 Transition from zonal circulation to more meridional flow in the European area, associated with a blocking pressure ridge meridionally elongated over the eastern Atlantic, and the westward movement of a retrogressive wave from Eurasia towards the Mediterranean basin à descent of a cold trough toward central Europe, which brought very cold air masses of continental origin in the Mediterranean àthe Mediterranean basin was characterized by a persistent cyclonic circulation associated with an exceptional cold anomaly ! exceptional persistence of Bora.
NCEP Reanalysis – T at 850 hPa NCEP Reanalysis, GPH at 500 hPa
ISAC WEB Page: www.isac.cnr.it/dinamica/projects/forecasts/
NWP MODELS developed at CNR ISAC
BOLAM: a limited area, hydrostatic, convection-parameterized model, typically applied to simulations on continent-scale areas. It is employed to bridge the gap between the "coarse" global model fields (0.5 deg. for the NOAA-GFS data and about 0.20 deg. for the ECMWF data) and the high resolution MOLOCH forecast. MOLOCH: non hydrostatic, convection-permitting model, applied to simulations/ forecasting at high resolution (1÷4 km) on regional/national domains. Nested in BOLAM. Physical schemes (radiation, PBL turbulence, soil and microphysics) are common in the two models. Dynamical core, vertical coordinate discretization differ. “Slab ocean model”: SST modulated by sfc fluxes and relaxed toward climatological value.
BOLAM 11 km MOLOCH 2.3 km
Ini$al and Boundary condi$ons
GFS NCEP Forecasts 0.5 deg
IFS ECMWF 0.25 deg
GFS NCEP SST form
Satellite data (MyOcean
0.0625x0.0625)
Three different sets of IC/BC
Initial and boundary conditions
FORECASTS SCHEME
BOLAM forecasts MOLOCH forecasts Model output considered for the analysis (+12h - +36h)
General picture of the Bora event – Comparison with ASAR (ENVISAT) retrieved wind field 02 Feb 2012, 21 UTC
ASAR
MOLOCH Different “jet” are observed and correctly predicted. Wind intensity over N-Adriatic is well captured (> 25 m/s). Hor. Res. allows to properly describe the critical topographical forcing responsible for the swing of high-speed low-level wind jets and wake areas. No deflection along the Italian coast.
28 Jan Onset
13 Feb Offset
WIND SPEED VIDA
ACQUA ALTA (Ve) S1 buoy
• OBS MOLOCH GFS MOLOCH IFS MOLOCH GFS+SAT
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb 27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
2m TEMPERATURE
S1 buoy
VIDA
ACQUA ALTA (Ve)
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb 27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
• OBS MOLCH GFS MOLOCH IFS MOLOCH GFS+SAT
SST
S1 buoy
VIDA
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
ACQUA ALTA (Ve)
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
Cold fresh water from the Po river
SURFACE HEAT FLUXES VIDA
ACQUA ALTA
• OBS MOLCH GFS MOLOCH IFS MOLOCH GFS+SAT
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
ΔT = T1st level - SST
S1 buoy
VIDA
ACQUA ALTA (Ve)
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb 27 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 16 Feb
• OBS MOLCH GFS MOLOCH IFS MOLOCH GFS+SAT
MOLOCH Surface Sensible Heat Fluxes 01 Feb 2012 at 15 UTC (+12h forecast)
MOLOCH-IFS MOLOCH-GFS
MOLOCH GFS+ SAT
MOLOCH-IFS MOLOCH-GFS
MOLOCH GFS+ SAT
MOLOCH Surface Latent Heat Fluxes 01 Feb 2012 at 15 UTC (+12h forecast)
Wind Speed - Acqua Alta Temperature - Acqua Alta
Wind Speed - Vida Temperature - Vida
u Obs u MOLOCH_IFS u MOLOCH_GFS u MOLOCH_GFS+SAT
Statistical Summary : Taylor Diagrams Standard DeviaRo
n Standard DeviaRo
n
Standard DeviaRo
n Standard DeviaRo
n
Good agreement between forecasts and observaRons and small differences among different simulaRons. Slightly worse results at S1 buoy
SST Acqua Alta SHF Acqua Alta LHF Acqua Alta
SST Vida SHF Vida LHF Vida
Standard DeviaRo
n
Standard DeviaRo
n
Standard DeviaRo
n
Standard DeviaRo
n
Standard DeviaRo
n
Standard DeviaRo
n
Statistical Summary : Taylor Diagrams u Obs u MOLOCH_IFS u MOLOCH_GFS u MOLOCH_GFS+SAT
Low correlation Similar correlation, but MOLOCH IFS in much better agreement
24-h Accumulated Precipitation
from 31 Jan 12 UTC to 01 Feb 12 UTC
MOLOCH-IFS
MOLOCH-GFS
Different IC/BC
Different SST initialization but also
different upper air fields!
MOLOCH-GFS
MOLOCH-GFS+SST
24-h Accumulated Precipitation
from 31 Jan 12 UTC to 01 Feb 12 UTC
Different SST initialization
Very weak impact of satellite SST initialization
on rainfall (snowfall) forecasts
MOLOCH-IFS
MOLOCH-IFS SST + 2°C
24-h Accumulated Precipitation
from 31 Jan 12 UTC to 01 Feb 12 UTC
Experiment to assess sensitivity to SST
initialization
Very weak impact of SST on snowfall over the
Apennines, increased precipitation over the central
Adriatic Sea
24-h Accumulated Precipitation
from 31 Jan 12 UTC to 01 Feb 12 UTC
Experiment to assess sensitivity to SST
initialization
Very weak impact of SST on snowfall over the
Apennines, decreased precipitation over the central
Adriatic Sea
MOLOCH-IFS
MOLOCH-IFS SST - 2°C
24-h Accumulated Precipitation
from 31 Jan 12 UTC to 01 Feb 12 UTC
Experiment to assess sensitivity to SST
initialization
Same results for GFS driven simulations: very weak
sensitivity
MOLOCH-GFS
MOLOCH-GFS SST + 2°C
24-h Accumulated Precipitation
from 31 Jan 12 UTC to 01 Feb 12 UTC
Experiment to assess sensitivity to SST
initialization
Same results for GFS driven simulations: very weak
sensitivity
MOLOCH-GFS
MOLOCH-GFS SST - 2°C
CONCLUSIONS - Different SST initializations shows:
- Much better agreement of ECMWF analyses, derived from OSTIA system (UKMO)
- Remarkable warm bias of GFS analysis (SST analysis based on IR satellite only)
- Limited impact of SST OI-analysis from satellite (MyOcean) mainly due to persistent cloud cover during the period
- Dynamical variables (e.g. wind) and Bora evolution are well forecast - SST initialization is critical for correctly forecasting surface fluxes and
temperature à importance for oceanographic applications - SST initialization has a weak impact on precipitation forecast for this severe
weather event à moisture is supplied by mesoscale circulation around the Mediterranean cyclone and not by the Adriatic Sea (short fetch, very cold air)
- Indication for model development: - the slab ocean model allows for a too fast cooling à revising heat capacity
(or thermocline depth) - Some discrepancies in forecast wind direction à increasing model horizontal
resolution - More event, also with different Bora characteristics need to be analysed