exclamation in english and arabic: a contrastive … journal of science commerce and humanities...
TRANSCRIPT
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
174
Exclamation in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Study
DR. Nadia Amin Hasan
Department of English
Faculty of Arts- Assiut University
Abstract
Exclamation is considered till now one of the challenging topics, particularly its semantics. Studies
on exclamation abound. Many studies on exclamation have compared different languages to English.
Languages covered by these studies include English, Italian, Paduan, Brazilian Portuguese, Turkish,
French, German, Setswana, Korean, Catalan, Vietnamese and Austronesian languages. On exclamation in
Arabic and English little is said. This paper aims at surveying the coding of exclamation in standard Arabic.
It aims, following Michaelis (2001) and Rett (2008) to examine the formal and the semantic features which
jointly define exclamation in English and contrast them with those of Arabic. The paper is divided into three
sections. The first begins with surveying different definitions of exclamations, a review of literature and the
method of analysis follow. The second section concentrates on a contrastive analysis of the coding of
exclamation in both English and Arabic. Thus, the Arabic material considered is examined according to the
bearings of the different definitions of the terms exclamation and exclamatives. Also, an analysis will be
conducted on Arabic according to the criteria set by linguists for identifying exclamation. Similarities and
differences together with the findings and the conclusion of the analysis will be pointed out in the third
section of the paper.
I. Introduction
Collins dictionary defines exclamation as an abrupt, emphatic or excited cry or utterance. It may also
be an interjection or ejaculation. Webster (1989: 330) confirms that to exclaim 'is to cry out in emotion or
excitement or to utter under the stress of sudden thought or emotion.' Trask (1993:96) introduces
exclamation as one of the four sentence types of traditional grammar, typically expressing a more or less
emotional comment on something and often enhanced by a grammatical distinctive form, or any utterance
serving to express emotion regardless of its grammatical form. Crystal (1997: 142) defines it as a term used
in the classification of sentence functions and defined sometimes on grammatical and sometimes on
semantic or sociolinguistic grounds.
Huddleston (1984: 351) states that 'exclamation is characterized by a sense of surprise. Exclamatory
statements are overlaid by an emotive element. They involve an emotive element' Quirk et al. (1985) use the
term 'exclamation' to refer to the logical or semantic status of an utterance. The term 'exclamative' is often
used to refer to a specific sentence/clause type on par with the three clause types declaratives, interrogatives
and imperatives. This means that in Quirk et al.‟s terminology, some exclamations are realized by
exclamatives, while some are not.
Sadock & Zwicky (1985:162 qtd in Beijir, 2002) state that declarative and exclamatory sentences are
similar as they both represent a proposition as being true, but they differ in that in an exclamation, the
speaker emphasizes his strong emotional reaction to what he takes to be a fact, whereas in a declarative, the
speaker emphasizes his intellectual appraisal that the proposition is true.” Radford (1997: 506 qtd. In Beijir,
2002: 1) defines an EXCLAMATIVE as “a type of structure used to exclaim surprise, delight, annoyance
etc. Michaelis (2001: 1039) states that 'Exclamations … are grammatical forms which express the speaker‟s
affective response to a situation: exclamations convey surprise. Surprise may be accompanied by positive or
negative affect.'
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
175
. In so far as Arabic is concerned, Eid (1992: 563- 4) states that exclamation is driven by a strong
feeling of astonishment arising from something curious and extraordinary. It is expressed positively to
glorify or exalt someone or something and it may be expressed to degrade or condemn. It may also encode
feelings of high elation or grief. Linguists confirm that it is a feeling of excitement for something
extraordinarily vague. This sort of excitement is called exclamation even though it is not outwardly
expressed. Grammarians state that it is an exaggerated description of something astonishing, unique and
unprecedented. Moreover, it is expressed verbally. There are two methods for wording exclamation in
Arabic: those that express functions other than exclamation but sanctioned as exclamatory by common usage
or derived from tradition (termed by grammarians 'sama؟i') and those consistent with the rules or norms
(termed by grammarians 'qyassi'.).
I.1. Review of literature:
Michaelis (2001: 1038) has conducted a typological survey of the coding of exclamatives as they
'form a variegated class both within and across languages'. She worked with examples from French,
German, Turkish, Setswana and Korean. Exclamatory utterances assert that the degree in question is higher
than the speaker would generally expect. Exclamative constructions, concluded Michaelis (2001:1042) are
characterized by some formal and semantic features.
Fabian Beijir's paper (2002) attempts to settle matters concerning the too many terminology used to
describe expressive/emotional utterance. Some of the terminologies used are EXPRESSIVE
UTTERANCES, EXCLAMATORY UTTERANCES, EXPRESSIVE SENTENCES, EXCLAMATIONS,
EXCLAMATIVES, and EXPRESSIVE SPEECH ACTS. He came up with the conclusion that ' if the
proposition in an expressive/emotional utterance indicates a high or extreme position on a semantic scale,
and a deviation from a norm, this expressive/emotional utterance is an exclamative. He, then, sorted out five
types of exclamatives: 1- Prototypical exclamatives, 2- Exclamatives with interrogative form, 3- Such (a)
and so exclamatives, 4- Exclamative that-clauses and to-infinitive clauses, 5-DPs used as exclamatives
Zanutti and Porter (2003) study exclamatives as they are a "less well-studied clause types" and to
detect whether force is represented in syntax. They note that clause types like exclamatives are detected by
some distinguishing semantic characteristics. They point out three properties which distinguish exclamative
clauses and show how they give rise to criteria which help pick out members of this class. The three
properties are: factivity, scalar implicature and inability to function in question/ answer pairs. Factivity
means that their propositional content is presupposed. It is a property that presupposes the truth of the
proposition expressed by that clause Scalar implicature, on the other hand, indicates that the proposition
they denote lies at the extreme end of some contextually given scale". Thus, if we say 'how very difficult the
exam is!, this indicates that the degree of its difficulty is greater than the alternatives under consideration,
and this aspect of its meaning can be labelled an implicature because it goes beyond the sentence‟s truth-
conditional meaning. They conclude that force can't be inferred by any element in particular in syntax.
Rather, clause types like exclamatives are detected by some distinguishing semantic characteristics. Their
work on exclamatives falls within the domain of Construction Grammar. They follow the line of Michaelis
and Lambrech (1996) but with a somewhat different approach.
.
Peter Collins (2004) conducts an empirical study of exclamative clauses in English, which is
intended to complement the accounts presented both in the comprehensive reference grammars and in the
more theoretically-oriented literature (e.g. Michaelis and Lambrecht 1996; and Zanuttini and Portner 2003).
He argued that the exclamative clause type is to be limited to constructions with an initial exclamative
phrase containing what (as modifier) or how (as modifier or adjunct), since only in these has there been a
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
176
grammaticalisation of the illocutionary force of exclamatory statement. .Ana C. P. (2004) investigated a
subclass of exclamative construction in Brazilian Portuguese characterized by a negative-bias inference.
. Castroviejo Mir´o (2008) proceeded from the claim that the semantics of exclamatives is a
challenging topic of linguistic research since their status as clause type is not well-defined. She concentrated
on embedded exclamatives and conducted a comparison between English and Catalan. Christopher Potts
and Florian Schwarz (2008) build logistic regression models and use the resulting statistics to state general,
corpus- and language-independent hypotheses about what it means to be an exclamative pragmatically.
These hypotheses allow us to identify previously unnoticed exclamatives, and they highlight the importance
of purely expressive meanings. Rett (2008) proposes a semantic account of exclamations. The account relies
on an important distinction between „proposition exclamations‟ (exclamations expressed with declarative
sentences, as in 1) and „exclamatives‟ (exclamations expressed with wh-clauses, definite DPs and inversion
constructions, as in 2.
(1) Sue wore orange shoes!
(2) a. (My,) How orange Sue‟s shoes were!
In her paper (2011), she provides a semantic and pragmatic account of exclamations. She draws on work in
degree semantics to explain why exclamatives can and must receive a particular type of degree
interpretation.
Sæbø's (2010) challenge has been to defend, in the face of potential counterevidence, the
hypothesis that interrogatives and exclamatives have basically the same denotations. Kaufman's article
(2010) examines the morphology and syntax of two types of nominalizations: exclamative formation and
temporal subordination across a wide range of Austronesian languages. Thi Vinch To (2012) investigated
some typical structures in English and Vietnamese. He also analyzed the uses of these sentences in
performing the illocutionary acts known as the exclamatory acts in the speech act theory. He proceeded from
the contention that there was less attention paid to the pragmatic perspective in dealing with exclamatives
while interest was paid to morphosyntactic and semantic aspects of Vietnamese. He concluded that
exclamatory sentences in English are used to show the following illocutionary acts: surprise, excitement,
compliment, painfulness, promise and comfort; while in Vietnamese they show the first four acts only.
Depending on the subject, object and the speaker's feelings, exclamative acts can be internal, external,
unconscious and conscious in both English and Vietnamese.
Chernilovskaya et al (2012) contended that utterances of wh-exclamative clauses convey two distinct
implications: descriptive and expressive content and they focus on the context change effect of exclamatives
assuming that their denotation is some semantic object that can be turned into a proposition corresponding to
their descriptive content. In a reply to the claim that exclamatives signal a mental state, they argue that:
'instead, we claim that they signal a mental occurrence, that is, a mental/emotive event. Exclamatives are
used when the speaker is „struck‟ by something (or pretends to be).
I. 2. The Theoretical Framework:
An analysis of Arabic will be conducted according to the semantic and formal criteria for identifying
exclamations and exclamatives as set by Michaelis (2001), Rett (2008) and other linguists who share the
same intuitions. In detecting Arabic exclamation, the material considered will be tested according to the
bearings of the different definitions of the terms exclamation and exclamatives. The paper follows the
differentiation made between exclamatives and exclamations posed by Quirk et al (1985).
Michaelis (2001) examines the formal and semantic criteria which define exclamations. She sets
them as the following: 1- The coding of surprise or the affective stance of the speaker: she states that
exclamatives are grammatical forms that express the speaker‟s affective response to a situation:
exclamations convey surprise. Surprise may be accompanied by positive or negative affect. Michaelis adds
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
177
that the speaker‟s affective stance toward the propositional content can be overtly expressed by a negated
epistemic predicator like I can’t believe or by an interjection denoting the speaker‟s surprised affect.'
However, the speaker‟s affective stance is not necessarily encoded at the lexico- grammatical level. She
exemplified that exclamation may be represented by an isolated-NP exclamative like The indignities that
the world heaps on him!; thus, the speaker‟s affective stance is not lexically expressed. In such cases we
can say that the speaker‟s affective stance can be inferred by the hearer from the semiotic value
conventionally attached to the form employed.
2- the expression of a speaker's viewpoint: she asserts that ' Both exclamations and declaratives linguistically
encode a proposition which the speaker assumes to be true'. But unlike declaratives, exclamations should
semantically and pragmatically presuppose that the proposition is known to both speaker and hearer. But the
scalar degree is known to the speaker only. Scalarity must be coupled with presupposition. Scalarity may be
syntactically realized by anaphoric degree adverbs. This sentence type can be expressed in different formal
expressions as there is a many-to-one mapping of form to function. Michaelis (2001) states them as follows:
1- Co-occurrence with interjections:
Exclamations give expression to the speaker's affective stance or attitude. Sometimes an exclamation
is realized by an interjection which is a word or a sound used to express a sudden feeling or emotion.
Interjections belong to the oldest form of the spoken language and represent the most primitive type of
utterance. Sometimes an exclamatory construction co-occurs with interjections. Interjections are a mark of
emotive emphasis in speech. The most common interjections in English as explained by Svartvik & Leech
(1985 :117)
Oh! = surprise
Ah! = satisfaction
Aha! = jubilant satisfaction or recognition
Wow! = great surprise
Yippee! = excitement or delight
Outch or ou! = pain
Ugh! = disgust
Eckersely & Eckersely (1981: 315) add the following to the list
Hello! = surprise in addition to its use as a greeting
Hey! = to attract attention
Alas! = a literary form expressing sorrow or disappointment
They comment that the interjections 'oh!' is sometimes written 'O'. Then, it may have the force of a verb
particularly in rhetorical speech.
O that I had done what he told me (ibid: 316)
O is followed by a noun clause. The same applies to 'alas' meaning I am sorry. (ibid: 335)
Thi Ven (2012: 2) states that Interjection can appear either before or after an exclamative expression.
He cites the following examples:
(1) Ah! Here they are!
(2) What a crazy cat that was, whoo!
2- Subordination to factive epistemic verbs: This property, factivity, was first pointed out by
Grimshaw (1979 qtd in zanutti and porter 2003: 19). Factivity presupposes that the propositional content
of the clause is true. Michaelis (2001) differentiates between main clause exclamative and constructions
containing exclamative complements. In main clause exclamatives, factivity is realized by an abstract
factive morpheme. In other constructions, factivity is realized syntactically by embedding the clause
under one of the factive verbs, e.g. know, agree, realize, etc. when they are embedded under a verb like
know or realize, in the present tense and with a first person subject, this verb cannot be negated, as seen
in the following:
I don‟t know/realize how very cute he is.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
178
Factivity may also be realized by embedding clauses under classes other than factive verbs. 'Adjectives and
noun construction', comments Crystal (1997:147), 'may display factivity, as in it's surprising that he left and
it's a shame that he left.'
3-Anaphoric degree adverbs, Rett (2008) concluded that when languages use degree words other than
question words in exclamative constructions, these are anaphoric degree words analogous to so(in English
and German), Italian cosı´, and French tellement.
.
4-Question words: An exclamative construction may take an information-question form.
5- Subject and finite verb inversion:
6- Right Dislocation:- Michaelis (2001: 1043) adds that an exclamative sentence type may invoke right
dislocated or unlinked topic as in
(a) She’s pretty sharp, my mom.
(b) That’s certainly a shame, that he’s not willing to discuss it.
In her semantic account of exclamation, Rett (2008) assumes that there are two semantic restrictions on
exclamatives: degree and evaluativity restrictions. She states that 'For the utterance of an exclamative to be
expressively correct, its content must additionally be about a degree, and that degree must exceed a
contextually relevant standard. (Rett, 2008: 601). Exclamation, she affirms, should also be judged on the
basis the evaluativity restriction, i.e. an exclamation is expressively correct if it is used to express surprise at
the content of the exclamation, and if this content is salient. … The content of the exclamative must
additionally be objectively surprising; specifically, the degree in question must be high relative to a
contextual standard. (Rett, 2008: 607)Thus, she concludes 'that any construction which denotes a degree
property can be used to utter an exclamative' (Rett, 2008: 612).
In addition and as deduced from the above review of literature, the semantic criteria of judging exclamation
can be summarized as follows:
1. The expression of a high or extreme position on a semantic scale or relative to a contextual standard
2. Deviation from a norm
3. Exclamatory utterances are emphatic. They are assertions.
4- Exclamatory utterances express the speaker's affective stance, positive or negative. They are overlaid by
an emotive element
II. Exclamation in English and Arabic:
II. 1. Exclamation in English
1-Prototypical or matrix exclamatives: The basic form of an exclamative 'is marked by an initial
exclamative phrase containing how or what'. They are called in the literature prototypical, matrix or
proposition exclamatives. Huddleston & Pullman (2005: 168) state that they may function as subject or
non-subject as in the following examples:
What unpleasant people work in this restaurant?
How clever you are!
They may also be main or subordinate clauses as in the following examples:
How very kind you are!
I told them how very kind you are! (Huddleston & Pullman 2005: 180)
2- Interrogative exclamatives: When uttering an exclamative, an interrogative clause may be used as in
the following:
Isn‟t she beautiful! (Rosengren 1997 qtd. in Bijar,2002: 9)
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
179
In the example above the speaker expresses his/her feelings concerning the fact that the female in question is
not only beautiful, but beautiful to a high degree on the scale of beauty (unless it is uttered ironically)
(Bijar,2002: 9)
Some wh-questions (called by Rett (2008: 613) Inversion exclamatives have the force of an exclamative
particularly when intensified by some adverbs. Svartvik & Leech (1985) state that 'You can intensify the
emotive force of a wh- question by adding some adverbs like ever, on earth etc. to the wh- word. They cite
the following examples:
How ever did he escape? {I just can't imagine!}
Why on earth you didn't tell me? {How silly of you!}
What in Heaven's name does he think he's doing? {The idiot!}
The utterances as such are all scalar; they all refer to phenomena on high positions on various scales.
Also when the subjunctive is combined with inversion may do as exclamations as in Far it be from me! as
pointed out by Quirk et al (1985:204).
3-Some statements when uttered with emphasis and falling intonation can do as exclamations or when
emphasized by 'do' when used as a dummy auxiliary or when Emphatic 'so' and 'such' are added as in the
following examples
You do look pretty!
He's such a nice man.
Negative statements when intensified by 'at all' express exclamatory meanings. For example:
I found nothing at all the matter with him.
Other negative intensifiers are 'a bit and by any means' (both adverbials of degree) and 'whatever' (a
postmodifier of a noun phrase).
You have no excuse whatever
Negative emphasis is also expressed by placing the negative element at the beginning of the clause:
Never have I seen such a crowd of people. (Svartvik & Leech ( : 118-119 )
c. 'can' is used in exclamations to express the idea 'is it possible..'
It surely can't be four o'clock already!
Could any one be such a fool as to believe that! (:Eckersely & Eckersely,1981: 197)
d. May is used in exclamatory sentences to express a wish
May all your dreams come true! (ibid: 206)
Some statements with comment clauses can do as exclamatory utterances; they are so called because they do
not add to the information, but they function as a comment on its truth' the manner of saying it or the attitude
of the speaker.
Stated bluntly, he had no chance of recovery.
What's more, we lost all our belongings
- Some sentence adverbials can express an emotional reaction as:
To my regret,he did not accept our offer.
Surprisingly, no one objected to the plan. (Svartvik & Leech, 1985: 121)
4- Nominal, DP, hidden or Non-sentence exclamations:
A DP as pointed out by Beijer (2002:14) can also be used as an exclamative, as long as the NP is
modified by a restricted relative clause (Quirk et al. 1985:11.53):
The fuss they made! (Quirk et al. (1985 §11.53)
Quirk et al. (1985) call the utterance above nonsentence, since it is a DP used as if it were a complete
sentence. This exclamative type naturally relies on the intonation contour. According to Quirk et al.
(1985:11.53) DP-exclamatives generally express disapproval, i.e. the speaker does not approve of the fuss
they made. Grimshaw (1979) refers to exclamations like that as hidden exclamatives.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
180
5- That-clause exclamations: Rosengren (1997 qtd. In Bijar,2002: 9-10) points out, however, that some
exclamatives consist of that-clauses. A that-clause denotes a real or hypothetical state of affairs, and when
using that clause exclamatorily, the speaker in question considers the existence of the state-of-affairs
denoted by the that-clause to be a deviation from a certain norm. They may be emphasized by so or such as
in the following examples they cite:
That I have something to do with this monstrousness!
That she could be so ruthless!
In example (16) the speaker considers the very fact that someone believes that he has something to do with
something described as a monstrousness to be remarkable. In example (17) the existence of the fact that she
could be so ruthless is in itself a deviation from a norm. Exclamations, thus, do not only express deviations
from certain norms, but also various feelings, such as astonishment, joy, surprise and disappointment in
relation to this deviation. These feelings regarding the propositional content of an utterance are conveyed via
certain intonation patterns.
Beijer (2002:13) affirms that 'when someone utters an exclamatory that-clause, he conveys that the
very existence of the fact in question is a deviation from a certain norm'. Zanuttii & porter (2003: 4) argue
that nominal and that-clause exclamatives have the two syntactic components marking an exclamative,
namely the wh- and the factive operator. The relative clause can fulfill the role of the wh- operator and the
definite article 'the' marks the clause as factive.
6- Infinitive exclamations: An infinitive is sometimes used in exclamatory sentences or in sentences
expressing a wish unlikely to be realized. For example:
To think that he knew about it all the time!
Oh! To be young again!
Oh! To be in England! (Eckersely & Eckersely , 1981: 235)
7- Echo exclamations, which repeat part or all of the preceding utterance:
A: I‟m going to London for a holiday.
B: To LONdon! That‟s not my idea of a rest. (Quirk et al. (1972: 7.84 qtd. In Bijar 2002:4)
8- There are also some exclamatory constructions. Eckersely & Eckersely (1981: 160) state that: a. some
exclamatory sentences are of the pattern 'adv./ v./ subj. i.e. adverbs have front position. This is so for
emphasis. 'This usage is in many cases literary and emotional' (ibid: 263)
Here comes the bride!
There goes our train!
Here they are!
b. Svartvik & Leech (1985: 125) state that the construction 'if only I could remember his name is
exclamatory
Now for some fun!
9- Repetition {which also denotes degree = extremely}
It's far, far too expensive. (Svartvik & Leech, 1985: 118)
10- Some imperatives in particular contexts could be classified as exclamatory, e.g. down with the prime
minister!
11- Epithet exclamative: Arnold M. Zwicky (2004: 1) adds another type of exclamation which he calls
epithet exclamatives and cites the following as an example:
You goddam linguist!
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
181
12- Single word exclamations
Some exclamations are expressed by single words. It is a type of language where no verb is needed
because every thing needed for the understanding of the message is provided by context'. Eckersely &
Eckersely (1981: 315) confirm that 'sometimes an ordinary word or groups of words are used as
interjections. For example: Silence! Well done! Stop! These 'perhaps are elliptical sentences equivalent to
something like: I want silence! You have done well'
II. 2. Exclamation in Arabic:
II.2. A. Syntactically based Exclamatives
1-Prototypical or matrix exclamatives The unmarked syntax for exclamatives in Arabic is what is called
in Arabic grammar Qyassi: or Rule-governed. This can be dubbed exclamatives.
1. Ryding (2005: 518-19) states that form IV of the trilateral verbs in Traditional Arabic is used,
preceded by the function word ma, to indicate surprise, wonder or astonishment at a certain quality or
characteristic of someone or something. Form IV is augmented from form I by the prefixing of hamza plus
fatha. It is a past non-finite verb. It has the stem pattern aC1C2aC3. It is followed by a noun in the accusative
or a pronominal suffix to indicate the possessor. The verbs used in this type of construction are sometimes
referred to as 'adjectival verbs'. They are also termed 'verbs of surprise or admiration' and they occur in two
types of constructions on the pattern: ma ?af؟al and ?af؟el bi-hi.
Examples:
Type I: Ma ?akrama zaydan
How generous zayd is!
Ma ?a؟ðama Muhammadan
How great Muhammad is!
Type II: ?akrim bi-Zaydin
?a ð؟ im bi-Muhammadin
In the Glorious Qur'an we have:
?absir bi-hi wa ?asme؟ (Qur'an :18- 28)
How well He beholds and how well He hears! (Ghali, 2008 : 296)
'Ma', in type I, is an indefinite exclamatory particle and it is the subject of the sentence. ?akram-a and
?a؟ðam-a are past non-finite verbs whose subjects are mustatir. The exclamatory objects are the two proper
nouns cast in the accusative with the vowel /a/ and the nunation. In this type also, the verb may be suffixed
with a pronoun that functions as the exclamatory object. It may be a second or a third person pronoun as
shown in the following examples:
?ilah-ii ma ?krama-k
My God how generous you are!
Qutila al-?insaan-u maa ?akfar-a-h (Qur'an: 80-17}
Slain be man! How disbelieving he is! (Ghali, 2008 : 585)
This verb also may be augmented by the preventive 'n' or 'nuun al wyqaya'. It, then, should be suffixed by
the first person pronoun i as in the following example
Ma ?fqara-n-i ?ila ؟afwa allah
Oh !How much I need God's forgiveness!
In type II ?akrim and ?a ð؟ im are also past non-finite verbs cast in the form of an imperative to
express exclamation. The letter bi- is additional and the two proper nouns are the subjects of the sentence.
They are in the nominative case as subjects but they are pronounced with kasra or the vowel /i/ and
nunation. The verbs used in these two types are the main verbs for exclamation.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
182
Verbs of surprise of the two above-mentioned types are formed only from trilateral verbs on condition that:
1- they are in the active voice
2- they are capable of being fully inflected. So, we can't use verbs of praise and blame like 'ne؟ma' and
'bi?sa'.
3- they should express an act or a state in which one person may surpass another.
4- they shouldn't be one of the defective verbs. So, we can't use defective verbs like 'kan'.
5- they shouldn't be one of those verbs whose adjectives are formed on the pattern ?f؟al for masculine and
fa؟laa? for feminine. So, we can't use, in this construction, verbs like ħamura 'to become red' and ؟awara 'to
become one-eyed' because the masculine and the feminine adjectives derived from these types of verbs are
?aħmar and ?a؟war and ħamraa? and ؟awraa? respectively.
If the verb does not agree with the above conditions, there must be some recourse to a
circumlocution. Thus, if the verb is augmented (e.g. tadahraja) we use a trilateral root verb that accepts
this form (e.g. a?a ð ma), then we follow it with the masdar as in the following example:
Ma ?a؟ðama tadahruja assaxra
How fast this rock rolls!
The same rules apply if the verb is one of the defective verbs.
Ma ?ajmal-a ?esbah-a al-sama? Safiya
How clear the sky is this morning!
Tammam Hassan (2003: 358/9) adds that because of the confusion resulting from using these
structures in interrogation and negation, Arabs resort to some techniques like dispensing with the verb
of surprise and forming the structure with the particle 'ma' and the use of '?ay'. The particle ma refers
to something wondrous. It is used in various verses of the Qur'an:
Fa-?awħa ?ila ؟abdihi ma ?awħa (Qur'an: 53- 10)
Then He revealed to His bondman what He revealed (Ghali, 2008 : 526)
Iz jağša assedrata ma jağša (Qur'an:53:16)
As that which envelops did envelop the lote-tree! (Ghali, 2008 : 526)
Ašša؟rawy comments on the two verses above saying that the particle ma indicates bewildering
numerousness and abundance; i.e. Allah has revealed to the prophet many miraculous things beyond
human expectations and belief. Moreover, the lote tree is enveloped by astonishing creatures known
only by God.
Another example:
al- qaari؟aa ma l-qaari؟aa (Qur'an:101:1/2)
The smiter! What is the smiter? (Ghali, 2008 : 600)
li-?ay yawmin ?ujila-t (Qur'an: 77: 12)
To whichever day is( this) term appointed? (Ghali, 2008: 580)
Wright (1964:316)states that the interrogative pronoun ?ay serves to express astonishment, in which
case it may always be put in the masculine singular and the noun which it governs in the genitive is
undefined. For example:
je?tani bi-rajul-in ?ay-u rajul !
You‟ve brought me a man, how great he is!
2- Another common exclamation type is realized by the use of vocatives. It is expressed by the
particle 'yaa' and '?ayuha' for masculine or ?ayatuha' for feminine. Then, a noun in the nominative with
the article follows as in:
Yaa ?ayyuha at-telmiiz
O you student!
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
183
It may be followed by a noun without the article if the person addressed is present If the person
addressed is absent, the noun is put in the accusative as in:
Yaa ğafilan (Haywood & Nahmad, 1965: 444)
O careless!
In standard Arabic 'some vocative nouns of an idafa construction' (Ryding: 170-1) are used to express
feelings of astonishment 'e.g. yaa-salam or of bereavement and loss 'e.g. yaa-xasara'.
Or the vocative as used in the Qur'an
Ya-bušra ! haza ğulam! (Qur'an:12-19}
What good tidings! Here is this youth! (Ghali, 2008: 237)
Exclamation of this type may also use the preposition 'l-' [pronounced with fatħa] in addition to a definite
noun in the genitive case. yalalmaskiin! O the poor man!
Yaalal?asaf! How unfortunate!
The preposition 'l-' is sometimes followed by a pronominal suffix to indicate the exclamatory object. It
should be followed then by the preposition min and an indefinite noun.
Yaalaka min jaban!
O what a coward you are!
Wa ya nukraha min saa؟a ħiin ؟ ada aššayx wa qad wara ibnatahu fi tturaab (Taha Hussein, 2010:
41)
What evil hour it was when the old man went home after he had buried his daughter!
Some vocatives are used as part of some formulaic exclamatory expressions. As indicated in the
quran in sura al-kahf (or the Cave)
Yaa-waylatana mali haza al-kitabi la yuğaderu sağyratan (Qur'an: 18-49}
Oh woe to us! How is it with this book that it leaves out nothing, small or great, except that it has
enumerated it? (Ghali, 2008: 299)
III. 2. Exclamation 'sama؟ii' = non-rule governed.
This can be dubbed exclamation. 1- Some formulaic constructions express functions other than
exclamation but sanctioned sometimes as exclamatory by common usage or depending on context. They are
termed in Arabic 'sama؟ii' as shown in the following:
a. the use of the masdar 'subħan' with the Name of Allah to express surprise or astonishment or as
indicated in the Qu'ran with the addition of the word 'rab' with the genitive first person pronoun annexed
to it 'Rabbi':
Qul subħaana Rabbi hal Kuntu illa bašarar rasuula (Qur'an:17- 93)
All extolement be to my Lord! Have I been anything except a mortal as messenger? (Ghali, 2008: 291)
This word 'subħaan' is used in prayers to glorify God
b. The use of some idiomatic verbs in an exclamatory sense like: 'qutel and kabur
Fa-qutela kayfa qaddar
θumma qutela kayfa qaddar (Qur'an:74: 19/ 20)
So, may he be slain, how he determined!
Again, may he be slain, how he determined! (Ghali, 2008: 576)
qutela al-?insan ma ?akfarah (Qur'an: 80- 17)
slain be man, how disbelieving he is! (Ghali, 2008: 585)
kaburat kalema-tan taxruju min ?fwahi-him (Qur'an:18: 5)
An odious word it is coming out of their mouths. (Ghali, 2008: 294)
In his interpretation of the glorious Qur'an, Attabari comments that the verb here equals the Arabic
prototypical exclamative: ?akber biha kalema how odious this word is! They claim that Allah has a son.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
184
Aššurawy comments that the verb kabur means ؟aðuma wa tanaha fi el-؟iðam, it is so odious that it has
reached an extreme point on the scale of atheism.
Many other formulaic expressions are used interjectionally (Haywood & Nahmad, 1965: 446). For
example:
La ?elah-a ?ela ?ant subħanak (Qur'an:21- 87)
There is no god except You. All extolement be to You! (Ghali, 2008: 329)
Ma؟aaz allah ?inn-a-hu rabb-i ?aħsan-a maθway(12-23)
Allah be my refuge! Surely He is my Lord who has given me the fairest lodging. (Ghali, 2008: 238)
Haša li-lah ma ؟alemna ؟alyhi men suu? (Qur'an:12- 51)
Allah forbid! In no way do we know any odious (deeds) against him. (Ghali, 2008: 241)
Some swear words are also used exclamatorily. When two friends negotiate after being judged one
to heaven and the other to hell, the former sees the latter's place. Then, he exclaims
Tallah-i in kedt-a laturd-iin (Qur'an:37- 56)
By Allah, decidedly you were almost about to topple me down indeed. (Ghali, 2008: 448)
It is a swear word used to express surprise as pointed out by Al- Fayd l-kašany in his interpretation of the
Qur'an. It is commented by Ghali (2008: 448) that tallahi is a stronger oath than the usual wallahi.
Moreover, the word rada, besides meaning perish, indicates a fall into the void or a deep well. It means a
fatal falling down,i. e. leading certainly to death.Thus, it is higher on the semantic scale of falling down than
waqa؟ , saqat or hawa (all meaning 'to fall' with scalar difference). Rosengren (1997 qtd. in Beijar (2002)
shows that:
the exclamatory/emotive function of exclamatives is triggered by the sentence mood, the
propositional properties, and the stress pattern. The proposition is described as a predicate
inducing a scale of some sort: DEGREE or QUANTITY. Generally, a speaker is
expected to produce a proposition of a certain value on some scale, that is, a proposition
in accordance with the norm in question.
Believers, when contemplate the great creation of heavens and nature, they exclaim:
Rabba-na ma xalaqt-a haza batil-an subhana-k (Qur'an:3- 191)
Our Lord, in no way have You created this untruthfully. All extolement be to You! (Ghali, 2008: 75)
When believers are judged to paradise, they exclaim:
Al-hamd-u lilah-i lazy sadaqana wa؟d-a-h (Qur'an:39- 74)
Praise be to Allah Who has sincerely (made good) His promise to us (Ghali, 2008: 466)
This is an expression of great joy and high elation.
2- Some constructions with lilah
Wa lilah ?awqata al ğaza? Tuula haza al-?usbuu؟ '(Taha Hussein: 2010: 28)
wa-lilah may also be added to the word darruhu as in:
Wa li-lahi darr-uhu min faris!
O! What a great knight he is!
3- Interrogative exclamation: The use of question words or interrogatives to express great
astonishment and surprise in what may be called rhetorical or exclamatory interrogatives. All types abound
in the Qur'an, for example:
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
185
a- The particle ?a may be used directly with the verb. For example: ?a- nu-?minu kama ?aama-a a-
ssufahaa? (Qur'an:2-13)
Shall we believe just as the fools have believed? (Ghali, 2008: 3)
b- the particle ?a may be prefixed to the word ?inna and to the conjunctions wa , fa, and θumm-a
?a-?inna la-madin-uun (Qur'an: 37- 53)
Will we surely be doomed indeed? (Ghali, 2008: 448)
?a-wa- lamma ?saba-t- kum musiiba-tun qad ?asabtum miθl-ayha qul-tum ?anna haza (Qur'an:3- 165)
And is it that when an affliction befell you, and you have alrea dy been afflicted twice over the like of it,
did you say 'however is this? (Ghali, 2008: 71)
?a-fa-ma naħnu bi-maytiin ?ila mawtatu-na al-?ula (Qur'an: 37- 58)
Then in no way will we be dead except for our first death. (Ghali, 2008: 448)
c. the interrogative particle hal:
hal θwweb-al-kuffar-u ma kan—u ya-؟mal-uun (Qur'an:83- 36)
Have the steadfast disbelievers been requited for what they were performing? (Ghali, 2008: 589)
d.the compound negative particle ?a-la
?a-la tastami؟-uun (Qur'an : 26- 25)
Do you not listen? (Ghali, 2008: 368)
It is said by the pharaoh to his companions and followers when confronted by Moses' claims of the
presence of God {or from the point of view of the pharaoh of a god other than him}.
e. the use of the particle of requiring with urgency or gentleness: ?alla halla lawla lawma. For
example:
lawla yukalimuna allah-u ?aw ta?tina ?aaya (Qur'an: 2- 118)
If only Allah had spoken to us or a sign had come up to us (Ghali, 2008: 18)
f. the interrogative pronoun man / ma:
man ?ilah-un ğayr ul-lah ya?tiikum bi-dyaa? (Qur'an: 28- 71)
What god other than Allah will come up to you with illumination? (Ghali, 2008: 394)
Ma-li-haza al-ketabi la yuğaaderu sağera-tan wa-la kabiira-tan ?illa ?aħsaha (Qur'an :18 -49)
How is it with this book that it leaves out nothing, small or great, except that it had enumerated it!
(Ghali, 2008: 299)
g. the interrogative pronoun ?ay
fa-?ay-u el-fariiq-ayn-i ?aħaq-u bi-l-?amn (Qur'an :6- 81)
Then, which of the two groups is worthier of security. (Ghali, 2008: 137)
h. kayf
fakayfa tataq-uuna in kafar-tum yawman yaj؟alu l-weldana šiiba (Qur'an :73- 17)
So, in case you disbelieve, how will you protect yourselves against a day that will make the new-born
hoary-headed. (Ghali, 2008: 574)
4- The use of nouns of numbers 'kam' and 'ka?ay' as exclamatory: Nouns of numbers are mainly
used as interrogatives to mean how many? But they are also used as 'assertory or exclamatory' [Wright,
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
186
1964: 125 Vol. II] to mean many or much. 'kam' is followed by a substantive in the genitive of the singular
or of the broken plural, and requires a verb in the perfect as in:
kam ğelman-an malak-tu!
How many a slave have I owned!
wa kam min malak-in fi ssamawat (Qur'an : 53- 26)
and how many an angel (there is) in the Heavens (Ghali, 2008: 526)
wa kam qasam-na min qary-tin kana-t ðalima { Qur'an: 21:11}
and how many a town that was unjust We have shattered .(Ghali, 2008: 323)
'ka?ayy' is ordinarily used as assertory or exclamatory but rarely as an interrogative. It is
compounded of 'ka' and the 'genitive of '?ayy' .
It abounds in the Qur'an:
Wa ka?ayyin min nabyyin qatala ma؟ahu rebyyon kaθiir-un-a fa-ma wahan-u lima ?sabahum fi sabeel illah
{ Qur'an: 3- 146}
And similarly how many a prophet there has been along with whom myriads manifold have bought; so in no
way do they feel feeble for whatever afflicted them in the way of Allah
(Ghali, 2008: 68)
Wa ka?ayyin min qaryatin ?amlaytu laha wa heya ðalima θumma ?axzt-u-ha { Qur'an: 22- 48}
And similarly many a town I have reprieved, while it was unjust; thereafter I took it (away) (Ghali, 2008:
338)
Wa ka?ayyin min qaryatin ؟atat ؟ an ?amri rab-i-ha wa rusul-i-hi fa-ħasab-na-ha ħesab-an šadiid-an wa
azaban nukra (Qur'an: 65-8)؟ azab-na-ha؟
And (similarly) many a town there has been that rebelled against the command of God and His messenger,
so We reckoned with it a strict reckoning, and tormented it a highly maleficent torment! (Ghali, 2008:559)
Wa ka?ayyin min ?aayatin fi ssamawati wa l-?ard yamur-uun ؟alyha wa hum؟ anha murid-uun (Qur'an: 12-
105)
And (similarly) many a sign (that are) in the heavens and the earth that they pass by, and they are veering
away from them! (Ghali, 2008: 248)
Ašša؟rawy comments on this verse that whenever you find this word ka?yyn, know that the noun following
is too many to count. It is definitely beyond counting or listing. I prefer to call these nouns of numbers
measurement operators following Rett (2011).
5- Some statements when uttered with emphasis are also exclamatory: the use of some emphatic
particles like ?inna and the lam. As in the following examples:
Inna la-dal-uun (Qur'an: 68-26)
Surely we are indeed erring people! (Ghali, 2008: 565)
Inna la-mudrak-uun (Qur'an: 26- 61)
Surely we are indeed overtaken! (Ghali, 2008: 370)
Same as English, emphasis in Arabic is also detected by repetition. In the following the use of
repetitive interjections is exclamatory:
Hayhata hayhata lima tw؟aduun (Qur'an :23- 63)
Away, away with whatever you are promised! (Ghali, 2008: 344)
Sentences with repetitive structure are emphatic and emotive; consequently they are exclamatory.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
187
But, unlike English, to indicate that a particular sense or action lies at the very end of a scale, the
absolute object of the verb is used undefined as in:
?za rujj-at el-?ard rajja wa bussa-t-i el-jebal-u bassa (Qur'an : 56: 4-5)
When the earth will be convulsed with a (severe) convulsion and the mountains crumbled with a violent
crumbling (Ghali, 2008: 534)
Wright (1964: 54-vol. II) states that 'it is used for strengthening or magnifying, i.e. to add greater force to the
verb. He adds (ibid: 55) 'still for greater emphasis the masdar may be repeated'. We have in the Qur'an:
?eza dukk-at el -?ardu dakkan dakka (Qur'an: 89- 21)
When the earth is pounded (into powder) pounding, pounding (Ghali, 2008: 593)
The destruction of the earth on the Day of Judgement is beyond imagination and description. It is something
unprecedented and inexperienced before.
Also for expressing something lying at the extreme end of a scale 'the masdar accompanied by a suffix
referring to the logical subject' is used as in:
Junn-a jun-uun-uh (ibid)
He reached the highest degree of madness!
As stated above, if the proposition in an expressive/emotional utterance indicates a high or extreme position
on a semantic scale, and a deviation from a norm, without explicitly stating this deviation, this
expressive/emotional utterance is an exclamative. (Biejir, 2002: 17)
6- Epithet exclamation: it is also available in Arabic. For example when the wife of the prophet
Ibrahiim is informed of begetting a child while she and her husband are very old she was surprised and her
immediate response was uttering an epithet
Faskkat wajh-a-ha wa- qalat ؟ajuz-un ؟ aqiim (Qur'an : 51- 29)
Then she beat her face and said 'an old sterile woman (Ghali, 2008:521)
7- Echo exclamation which repeats a previous utterance or part of it to express astonishment is also
available in Arabic as indicated by the following:
-Xatab-ha ؟abbas el-helw qabla safarihi ?ila a-ttal elkabiir
-?abbas el-helw! (Mahfouz, 1977: 142)
-She has been engaged to Abbas el Helw
Abbas el-Helw!
7- Single word exclamation: it is stated by Haywood & Nahmad, (1965: 446) that 'certain nouns are
used in the accusative as interjections. For example: marħaba! 'welcome' and ؟ajaban! 'strange'. The
thundering cries 'bread! Freedom! Social justice' ushering in the 25th
of January revolution are considered a
type of exclamations. It was a cry for a long-lived injustice and a deep-rooted sense of degradation and
marginalization.
8- The use of exclamatory negation:
One may exclaim by uttering negative sentences, for example:
Ma sam؟ena bi-haza fi-l-milati l-?aaxera (Qur'an: 38- 7)
In no way did we hear this in the last creed (Ghali, 2008: 453)
ma la-hum bi-hi min ؟elmin wa-la li-?abaa?i –him (Qur'an : 18-5)
In no way do they have any knowledge of it, nor their fathers (Ghali, 2008: 294)
ma-?šhad-tu-hum xalq-as samawati wa-al-?ardi wa-la xalqa ?anfusi-him (Qur'an: 18- 51)
In no way did I make them witness the creation of the heavens or the earth (Ghali, 2008: 299)
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
188
9- The use of verbs of praise and blame particularly 'ne؟ma' and 'be?sa' are also used to exclaim
in particular contexts. In the Qur'an we have
Wa be?sa al-wirdu l-mawruud (Qur'an: 11- 98)
And miserable is the herding to be herded! (Ghali, 2008: 233)
It is stated in the Qur'an that the pharaoh will take his followers to hell. Then the Qur'an comments with the
above verse.
'Oh! The worst place ever!
Fa-ne؟ma ?ajr-u l - ؟amil-iin (Qur'an : 39- 74)
So how favourable is the reward of the good doers! (Ghali, 2008: 466)
When believers are ordered to paradise, they exclaim: oh! how great our reward is!
fa-?iza nazala bi-saħati- him fa-saa?a sabahu l- munza-riin (Qur'an: 37- 177)
So when it comes down in their courtyard, then how odious will be the morning of them that are
constantly warned. (Ghali, 2008: 452)
How worse that morning is when they are awakened to the ever-lasting punishment of God. It is the worst
morning ever!
Many verbs are used in the imperative to mark great surprise and amazement in particular context.
When the Jini are sent by God to listen to the Qur'an, they are stunned by its rhetoric and greatness and they
order one another: Hark! The Qur'an says:
Fa-lamma hadaro uh qal-u ?nsetu (Qur'an: 46- 29)
As soon as they were in its presence they said: Hearken! (Ghali, 2008: 506)
They listen until the prophet finishes. Then, they run away to their people to warn them against God's anger
if they remain disbelievers. The Qur'an says:
Fa-lamma Qudy-ya wall-au ?ila qawm-i-him Munzer-iin (Qur'an: 46- 29)
Then as soon as it finished, they turned back to their people, constantly warning. (Ghali, 2008: 506)
An emphasis enough that their running away is an expression of their surprise over what they have heard is
their statement in sura al-jin
Inna same؟na qura'an-an ؟ajaba (Qur'an: 72- 1)
Surely we have heard a wonderous Qur'an. (Ghali, 2008: 572)
10-Some particular constructions are used to conjure up some exclamatory meanings like wa law tara
meaning there is nothing like this you will ever see or hear!
Wa-law tara iz faze؟-u fa-la fawt (34: 51)
And if you could see them as they get alarmed: so there is no eluding. (Ghali, 2008: 434)
What is observed here is that it is a conditional sentence without its apodosis. Ašša؟rawy, in his
interpretation of the Qur'an, states that the then clause of this conditional sentence is dispensed with because
it is implied. The meaning indicated is 'if you behold them, Muhammad, when they are in such a fright on
the Day of Judgment, you will see something extraordinarily astonishing that will comfort your heart. They
will be punished in return for their blasphemy and disbelief.
O behold them! How frightened they are when they hear the call for resurrection from which there is no
escape!
Wa-law tara iz eðalim-uun mauquf-uun ؟end-a rabb-i-him yarje؟u badihim ?ila ba؟din el-qawl (34: 31)
And if you could see as the unjust ones are being made to stand in the reckoning of their Lord, bandying
argument the one against the other! (Ghali, 2008:431)
O behold them! When they are brought over on the Day of Judgement and they stand in front of God
helpless and unaided casting the blame on one another!
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
189
11- Same as English, exclamation can be expressed by interjections which 'are called by the Arabs sounds or
tones.' [Wright 1964: 294- vol. I]. They also co-occur with exclamations. Some of the interjections used in
the Qur'an in an emotive sense and which have a verbal force are:
Ha = look!
Hayt = come here!
Hayhat = far from it!
Halum = bring here!
Waa: waa ?slamah
Way = woe!
Way ka?anna allahu yabsut-u el-rizq-a li-man ya- šaa?u min ؟ebade-hi
(Qur'an : 28- 82)
Ah, actually Allah outspreads the provision to whomever He decides of H:is bondmen. (Ghali, 2008: 395)
?uff = ugh! Fie!
In the qur'an we have in the story of the parents whose son denies them their Islam and resists being
converted to Islam or believing in God. He exclaims in their face:?uff!
Wa-llazi qala li-walid- ayhi ?uffin la-kuma (Qur'an : 46- 17)
And he who say to his parents 'fie upon you both' (Ghali, 2008: 504)
Tab-an! = death
When the prophet called up the people of Mecca to inform them that he is the messenger of God to them, his
uncle Abu-lahab exclaimed in his face:
Taba-an la-k! ?a-li-haza jama؟ta-na
Death to you! Have you gathered us to tell us this nonsense!
Wright (1964: 296- vol.I) states that some interjections have, 'by origin or use, a certain verbal force
and have therefore called ?asmaa? Al?f؟aal'. They are either originally imperatives, as 'hati' meaning give
here or equivalent to imperatives and in some cases admitting its construction and inflection. For example
ha may be joined by the pronominal suffixes of the second person. In which case it is equivalent to the
imperative of '?axaza'.
Hak-a-ha = take her!
Or a hemza may be substituted for the 'k' and the word decline as follows:
Singular masculine 'ha?a' and feminine 'ha?i'
Dual 'ha?uma'
Plural masculine 'ha?umu as in:
'ha?umu ?eqra?uu ketabyya' (Qur'an: 69-19)
Here you are! Read my book (Ghali, 2008: 567)
12- Exclamation in Arabic is expressed by many verbs involving the body (Levin's encoding of this class
of verbs, 1993: 217) For example:
Faskkat wajha-ha wa- qalat ؟ajuzun ؟ aqiim (Qur'an :51- 29)
Then she beat her face and said 'an old sterile woman (Ghali, 2008:521)
The act of striking the face with the hand is an indication enough that her astonishment is beyond
expression. It is something unprecedented that couples who are far beyond the age of begetting have
suddenly become expectant parents.
Fa-?asbaha yuqalibu kaff-ay-hi ؟ala ma ?anfaqa fiha (Qur'an :18- 42)
So in the morning, he became (remorseful) wringing his hands for what he expended upon it. (Ghali, 2008:
298)
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
190
This is said by the owner of the garden that has been devastated for his refusal to give something out of it for
the poor. When he saw it, he was stunned. He kept wringing his hand, which is an emphasis enough of
surprise and astonishment. His story was mentioned in sura al kahf (the Cave).
Another exclamatory act expressed by a body part verb is the movement of the head up and down. In
the Qur'an we have:
Fa-sa-yunğeduun ?elaika r?uus-a-hum wa-yaquluun mata huu (Qur'an: 17:51)
Then, they will wag their heads at you and they will say ,"when will it be? Say, "it may be drawing near".
(Ghali, 2008:287)
The verb is derived from the root 'nğd' that means moving the head up and down as an act of amazement and
surprise.(al- Mu؟jam al-wajiiz: 625) They do so because of what the prophet informs them of the certainty of
resurrection.
Fa-lamma ra?a-yna-hu ?kbar-na-hu wa-qata؟-na ?aydya-hun (Qur'an: 12- 31)
So, as soon as they saw him, they were greatly amazed at him and cut their hands severely. (Ghali, 2008:
239)
The Qur'an says that when the women saw the prophet Yousuf, they were amazed by his beauty. The degree
of their surprise and involvement is expressed by the act of cutting off their fingers unaware of what they
were doing.
When the magicians are confronted by Moses by order of the pharaoh, his evidence [i.e. the stick that
all of a sudden turned into a huge snake that swallows up all their tricks] outweighs their magical tricks. The
magicians, amazed and bewildered, have nothing to do to express their amazement and their stunning sense
of God's greatness but to prostrate humbly in self-abasement. No words are enough. The Qur'an says:
Fa?ulqya as-saharatu sajed-iin (Qur'an : 26- 46)
So the sorcerers were cast down, prostrating themselves. (Ghali, 2008: 369)
?iza yutla ؟alay-him ya-xer-uun lil-?azqani sujjadan (Qur'an :17-107)
When it is recited to them, they collapse upon their face prostrating. (Ghali, 2008: 293)
The extreme limit of their glorification to God's words is expressed by prostrating.
Walla mudberan wa lam yu؟aqeb( Qur'an : 27- 9)
He turned away withdrawing and did not retrace his steps. (Ghali, 2008: 377)
Moses, when called by God in the Holy Land of Sinai to be sent as a messenger to the pharaoh, his first
response is running away, an expression of great surprise and horror.
Wa tara qula ummatin jaθya (Qur'an : 45- 28)
And you will see every nation kneeling down (Ghali, 2008: 501)
On the Day of Judgement, every nation is horrified. They kneel down in horror. The extent of their horror is
expressed by kneeling down.
Wa-tada؟u kulu zati ħamlin ħamla-ha wa tara annasa sukara wa ma hum bisukara wa lakin azaab-a alla-hi
šadiid (Qur'an : 22- 2).
And every pregnant female will lay down her burden; and you see mankind drunken, and in no way are they
drunken but the torment of Allah is strict. (Ghali, 2008: 332)
Every pregnant lady gives birth to her child, even if it is immature.
Some verbs that express body- internal states of existence (Levin's encoding of this subclass of
verbs, 1993: 223) are used to express extreme feelings. This is a subclass of the above-mentioned class of
verbs. They describe a physical state of the subject that is a reflex of a particular psychological state as
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
191
indicated by Levin (ibid). For example: An assertion of believers' great fear when they listen to the verses of
the Qur'an and what it expresses of what awaits disbelievers, they shudder and tremble. The Qur'an says:
Taqša؟eru min-hu guluudu l-aziin yaxšawna rabba-hum (39: 23)
Whereat shivers the skins of the ones apprehensive of their Lord. (Ghali, 2008: 461)
Wa aqtaraba al-wa؟d ul-haq fa?za hija šaxesatun ?bsar ul-aziin kafaru ya waylana qad kunna fi ğaflatin
min haza bal kunna ðalimiin (Qur'an :21- 97)
And the True Promise has drawn near. So, only then do the beholdings of the ones who disbelieved keep
glazing over! O woe to us! We were already in a state of heedlessness of this; no' indeed we were unjust!
(Ghali, 2008: 330)
Wa iz zağat el- ?absar-u wa balağati l-quluub ul ħanaje r(Qur'an : 33-10)
And as beholdings swerved and hearts reached the larynx. (Ghali, 2008: 419)
This verse shows another body part verb to express great horror. The first is related to the eyes with which
they stare or look fixedly. Moreover, their hearts lurch up or move until they reach their larynx.
To express even greater horror on the day of Judgement, the Qur'an says:
Wa ?anzer-hum yawma al-?aazefati iz el-quluubu lada al-hanajeri kaðim-iin (Qur'an :19- 39)
And warn them against the Day of Imminent (Doom) as the hearts are close to the larynxes and they are
repressing (anguish inwardly) (Ghali, 2008: 308)
Here, their hearts lurch up until they reach the larynx and get jammed there. They will be choking the throat.
They do not either return to their places or get out and consequently they die and get rid of this horror.
II. 2. B. Morphologically-based exclamations
Merin & Nikolaeva (2008: 2) state that exclamations exhibit a bewildering variety of morphological and
syntactic forms. Exclamatory meaning in Arabic is sometimes morphologically indicated by exhibiting an
extreme degree in some constructions. Various derivatives of the root ؟a-j-b are used to indicate amazement.
They exhibit degree morphology defined by Rett (2011: 14) as 'a cover term for gradable or amount
predicates.' For example
Inna same؟na qur?aanan ؟ajaba (Qur'an : 72- 1)
Surely we have heard a wonderous Qur'an. (Ghali, 2008: 572)
Inna haza la-šay?un ؟ajiib { Qur'an : 11-72}
Surely this is a wonderful thing. (Ghali, 2008:230)
Inna haza lašay?un ؟ujaab { Qur'an : 38:5}
Surely this is indeed a most wondrous thing. (Ghali, 2008: 453)
Different forms derived from this root are used. For example, we have verbs, adverbs, nouns and
adjectives. In the first example we have the form ؟ajab that follows the pattern CaCaC or fa؟al. In the
second and third examples we have different patterns of adjectives. All of them are attributive adjectives.
The first adjective describes the matter as something amazing and marvelous. The second adjective ؟ajiib
follows the pattern fa؟iil. The third adjective follows the pattern fu؟aal as it is read ؟ujaab or the pattern
fu ؟؟ aal as it is sometimes read ؟ujjaab in another way of reading the ؟ayya. These are two intensive forms of
the adjective, though the latter is less common. Adjectives of these forms indicate a very high degree of the
quality which their subject possesses (Wright, 1965: 136/7 vol.II). It is commented that 'the words ؟ajab
nearly indicates something astonishing, ؟ajiib adds more meanings, ؟ujaab means the thing that goes far
beyond expectation and ؟ujjaab that is read with the gemination of the second radical indicates the farthest
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
192
end of amazement (al-qurtuby: 15/ 68:9). Thus, if we put them in an ascending order of intensity, they are as
follows:
ujjaab؟ ujaab؟ ajiib؟ ajab؟
In the Qur'an we have these two verses:
Bal ؟ajebta wa ya-sxar-uun/ wa ?za zukker-uu la yazkr-uun
Wa ?za ra?a-w ?ayatan yastasxruun (Qur'an : 37- 12/14)
No indeed, you wonder and they scoff. And when they are reminded, they do not remember. And when they
see assign, they turn it into scoffing. (Ghali, 2008: 446)
In Arabic, if a word exhibits an increase in its morphological make-up, this indicates intensity in its
meaning. The more there is evidence of the prophet's truthfulness, the more they are led astray. yastasxruun
indicates the extremity of their scorn .
wa –hum ya-starix-uuna fi-ha (Qur'an : 35- 37)
And they scream aloud. (Ghali, 2008:438)
They are crying in hell. They have reached an extreme degree of crying, an indication enough of their terror
and pain and that they are taken aback. The situation is totally unexpected and terrorizing. There is a
difference of degree between the two verbs 'yasrix' and yastarix' both meaning 'cry'. The latter follows the
pattern of form VIII of trilateral verbs. This verb is augmented with respect to form I in that an infix /t/ is
added to the form after the first radical. This verb is in the present tense. Thus, it is prefixed with the present
tense subject marker ya-. It has the pattern ya- C1-ta-C2iC3. It is stated that 'form VIII verbs may be
reflexive or medio-passive in meaning, but they also express a wide range of meanings that are difficult to
predict.' (Ryding: 2005: 543). This form has phonologically many characteristics. It is stated that 'the
insertion of the extraneous consonant /t/ within the root sometimes affects the spelling and the pronunciation
of form VIII. Various forms of assimilation of the infixed –taa- to the initial root consonant occur. The taa,
as a result of a process of progressive assimilation, is velarized if the initial root consonant is velarized, i.e. it
is either s,d, t, or ð. Thus, the taa changes to taa.
Fa-ta?ala allah-u l-malik-u lhaq la ?ilaha ?ila huwa rabu l؟-arši l-kariim (Qur'an : 23- 116)
Then Supremely Exaltd be Allah, The King, The Truth! There is no god but He, The Lord of the Honorable
Throne. (Ghali, 2008: 349)
The pattern of this verb is tafa؟al. this is form VI of trilateral verbs. It is augmented with prefixed ta- and a
long vowel –aa- inserted after the third consonant of the trilateral root. It is in the present tense. The subject
marking stem vowel is fathaa and the two stem vowels are fathaa. Thus, it has the stem pattern ta-
C1aaC2C2A3. One meaning of this form of the verb is 'gradual, continuous movement or increase in a
quality' (Ryding: 2005: 543). In his interpretation of the Qur'an, ašša؟rawy says that the word ta?ala means,
when ascribed to God that HE is far above all in HIS Righteousness, His Purity, His Impartiality, Integrity
and Blemishlessness. The Throne is also specified here because it is the topmost of all God's creation. So,
what is meant is that Allah is in the highest degree of Greatness and Sublimity with nothing and no one else
above. This satisfies the criterion of scalar implicature. It is affirmed
III. Conclusion:
A survey of different analyses on exclamations has shown that the most common criteria linguists
count on for identifying exclamation are scalar implicature (the expression of a high or extreme position on
a semantic scale), factivity, emphasis, deviation from a norm and the expression of the speaker's affective
stance positive or negative. Linguists have also differentiated between exclamatives and exclamation in
English. Exclamation is an all-inclusive term. Exclamative is only a clause type. In so far as the English
language is concerned there are prototypical exclamatives realized by wh-words (wh- exclamatives),
interrogative exclamatives (or rhetorical questions), exclamatory statements (accompanied by some sentence
adverbials or when uttered with particular emphasis and intonation), noun phrase exclamation, that-clause
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
193
exclamation, exclamatory infinitives, echo exclamation, epithet exclamation, some verbless imperatives and
single word exclamations. Formulaic expressions, vocatives and interjections are also exclamatory.
Exclamation in English is a syntactic and semantic phenomenon.
In Arabic, there are two methods for wording exclamation. The first is that consistent with the rules
or norms: 'qyassi', which corresponds exactly to the English term 'exclamative'. The second is 'sama؟i'
which corresponds exactly to the term 'exclamation' in English, i.e those constructions that express functions
other than exclamation but sanctioned as exclamatory by common usage or derived from tradition.. The
former is expressed by 'verbs of surprise or admiration' and they occur in two types of constructions: ma
?af؟al and ?af؟el bi-hi. They are sometimes reduced to the particle 'ma'. Other particles may be used like
?ay. It is also realized by the use of vocatives. The latter is realized by the use of some formulaic expressions
like subħan, some swear words, particular constructions like wa-lilah and wa law tara, the use of
interrogative and exclamatory negation, nouns of numbers and emphatic statements. The emphasis is
realized by the use of inna, lam of emphasis, repetition, the absolute object of the verb or the masdar
accompanied by a suffix referring to the logical subject and. verbs of blame and praise are sometimes
exclamatory in particular contexts.. Same as English, various types of exclamations like epithet, echo and
single word exclamation are also present in Arabic. Interjections are also exclamatory though some of them
differ from English interjections by having a verbal force. Exclamation in Arabic is sometimes kinetically
realized by the use of verbs involving the body and verbs that denote body internal states of existence. It is
also morphologically expressed by a variety of degree morphology. Thus, in Arabic exclamation is a
morphological, syntactic, semiotic and semantic phenomenon. The study suggests the inclusion of these
categories in grammar books.
Appendix 1
The Phonemic Symbols that will be used to represent the Arabic Data in the Study are Listed
Below with their Corresponding Arabic Graphemes.
[b] Voiced bilabial stop [ب]
[t] Voiceless alveo-dental stop [ت]
[t] Voiceless alveo-dental velarized stop [ط]
[d] Voiced alveo-dental stop [د]
[d] Voiced alveo velarized stop [ض]
[k] Voiced velar stop [ك]
[q] Voiceless uvular stop [ق]
[?] Voiceless glottal stop [ء]
[g] Voiced alveo-palatal fricative [ج]
[ħ] Voiceless pharyngeal fricative [ح]
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
194
[ع] Voiced pharyngeal fricative [؟]
[f] Voiceless labio-dental fricative [ف]
[] Voiceless dental fricative [ث]
[z] Voiced dental fricative [ذ]
[ð] Voiced dental velarized fricative [ظ]
[s] Voiceless alveolar fricative [س]
[s] Voiceless alveolar velarized fricative [ص]
[z] Voiced alveolar fricative [ز]
[š] Voiceless alveo-palatal fricative [ش]
[x] Voiceless alveo-palatal fricative [خ]
[ğ] Voiced uvular fricative [غ]
[h] Voiced glottal fricative [ه]
[r] Voiced alveolar trill [ر]
[l] Voiced alveolar lateral [ل]
[m] Voiced bilabial nasal [م]
[n] Voiced alveolar nasal [ن]
[y] Voiced palatial glide [ى]
[w] Voiced bilabial round glide [و]
[i] High front vowel [ ]
[a] Low back vowel [`]
[u] High back rounded vowel [ ]
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
195
Note: Consonant gemination and vowel length are represented by doubling the respective consonant or
vowel letter.
Bibliography
Books and Articles
Abels, K. 2010. Factivity in exclamatives is a presupposition. Studia Linguistica, 64(1), 141-157.
Ana C.P. 2004. Presupposition and focus in a subclass of exclamative constructions in Brazilian
Portuguese. Bastos (University of Connecticut). Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian
Linguistic Society
Bastos, A. C. (2008). Presupposition and Focus in a subclass of exclamative constructions in Brazilian
Portuguese. In 38th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 4-6).
Beijer, Fabian. 2002. The syntax and pragmatics of exclamations and other expressive/emotional utterances.
Working Papers in Linguistics, 2.
Cantarino, Vicente. 1976. The Syntax of Modern Arabic Prose. 3 vols. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press.
Castroviejo Mir´o, Elena (2007) “A degree-based account of wh- exclamatives in Catalan”, in Puig-
Waldm¨uller (ed.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 , Barcelona, 134–149.
Castroviejo Miró, E. (2008). What does it take to embed an exclamative. Graduiertenkolleg Satzarten,
Universität Konstanz
Cayne, Bernard S., ed. 1989. The new lexicon Webster's dictionary of the English language. New York:
Lexicon Publications, INC.
Crystal, D. 1997. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Limited.
Eid, M. 1992. Al- Naħw al- Mussafa. Cairo: Maktabat Aššabaab.
Eckersely C. E. & Eckersely J. M.1981. A Comprehensive English Grammar. London: Longman
Elliott, D. 1974. „Toward a grammar of exclamations‟ Foundations of Language 11: 231-46.
Ghali, M. M. 2008. Towards Understanding the Ever- Glorious Qur'an. Darranashr lilgami؟aat. Cairo,
Egypt.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2):279–326.
Hanks, P. 1985. Collins dictionary of the English language. London: Collins.
Hassan, Tammam. (2003). Al-Bayan fi Rwai؟ el Qur'an. Al-hay?a al-misriyya al-؟amma lel-ketab.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
196
Haywood , J. A. & Nahmad. 1965. A New Arabic Grammar of the Written Language. Lewis Reprints
Limited.
Huddleston, R. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R & Pullman, G. K. A Student's Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Hussein, T.2010. ?al- ?ayyam. Cairo: October Printing Houses.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. The University of
Chicago Press
Mahfouz, Naguib (1977). Zuqaq el madaq. Cairo:Matabat Misr.
Majma؟al-luğa al-؟arabyya. 2009. Al- Mu؟jam al-wajiiz. Cairo:AL-matabe؟
Al-?amiryya
Merin, A., & Nikolaeva, I. (2008). Exclamative as a universal speech act category: A case study in decision-
theoretic semantics and typological implications. Ms., University of Konstanz and SOAS London University.
Michaelis, L. (2001). Exclamative constructions. In Haspelmath, M., editor, Language typology and
language universals: An international handbook, volume 2, pages 1038{1050. De Gruyter.
Michaelis, Laura and Knud Lambrecht. 1996a. Towards a construction-based theory of language function:
The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72(2):215–247.
Michealis, Laura and Knud Lambrecht. 1996b. Discourse and Language, 375–389. CSLI, Stanford.
Michaelis L & K Lambrecht 1996 „The exclamative sentence type in English‟ in A Goldberg (ed.)
Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language CSLI: Stanford, CA: 375-89.
Potts, Christopher, and Florian Schwarz.. 2008. "Exclamatives and heightened emotion: Extracting
pragmatic generalizations from large corpora." Ms., UMass Amherst: 1-29.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English, Longman,
London.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Radford, A. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. A Minimalist Approach, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Rett, J. (2008). A degree account of exclamatives. In Proceedings of SALT (Vol. 18, pp. 601-618).
Rett, J. (2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(5), 411-442.
Rosengren, I. 1997. ‚Expressive Sentence Types - A Contradiction in Terms. The Case of Exclamation‟, in
Swan, T. & O. Jansen Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
197
Ryding, Karine C. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
Sæbø, K. J. (2010). On the semantics of “embedded exclamatives”. Studia Linguistica, 64(1), 116-140.
Svartvik, J., & Leech, G. (1985). A communicative grammar of English. LAUDT, Linguistic Agency.
Sadock, J. M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. „Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax‟, in Shopen, T. (ed),
Language Typology and Syntactic Description. London: Cambridge University Press. 155-197
Trask. 1993. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Wright, W. 1964. A Grammar of the Arabic Language. 2 Vols. Cambridge University Press.
Zanuttini, Raffaella and Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface.
Language 79 (1):39–81.
Online Sources
Al- Fayd l-kašany Tafseer Assafy.
http://www.ruqayah.net/books/index.php?id=1101
Ašša؟rawy, M. M. thoughts on the Qur'an. www.alro7.net/ayaq.php?langg=arabic&aya
Attabary, M. Jame؟ Al-Bayan Fi Tafsiir Al-Qur'an. www.alro7.net/ayaq.php?langg=arabic&aya
Castroviejo Mir´o, E. 2006. Wh-exclamatives in Catalan. University of Barcelona dissertation..
http://user.uni-frankfurt.de/_castrovi.
Chernilovskaya, Anna, Cleo Condoravdi & Sven Lauer .2012. How to express yourself: On the discourse
effect of wh-exclamatives. Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. University
of California, Santa Cruz. April 13–15, 2012 http://www.stanford.edu/~cleoc/WCCFL-Handout.pdf
Collins, Peter. 2004. Exclamative Clauses: a Corpus-based Account
Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society
From: prijipati.library.usyd.edu.au
Kaufman, Daniel. 2010. Exclamatives and temporal nominalizations in Austronesian
http://www.engl.polyu.edu.hk/research/nomz/files/KAU.Austro.final.pdf
Rett, Jessica (2012) Expressing exceeded expectations in exclamatives
and other constructions_2nd Cornell Workshop in Linguistics and Philosophy October 20
http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Rett/cornell%20handout.pdf
Thi Vinh To .2012. Exclamatives and Exclamatory Acts in English and Vietnamese. The Internet Journal of
Language, Culture and Society URL: www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL/ ISSN 1327-774X
Zwicky, A. (2004). Isolated NPs. Talk presented at the Stanford
Semantics.Fest,5.http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=5&uin=uk.bl.ethos.555436
International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities Volume No 2 No 2 February 2014
198
The sky, the mountains and the earth are God's creatures. They glorify God and feel great anger for
man's sins and ingratitude. They feel even more furious when some disbelievers claim the presence of a son
for God. This great anger is expressed in the following verse:
Takadu samawatu ya-tafatar-n min-hu wa tanšaq-u
l-?ardu wa taxeru el-jebalu hadda (Qur'an: 19- 90)
the heavens are almost about to be rent asunder thereof and the earth cloven and the mountains to collapse,
razed (completely)
The sky and the earth's anger is expressed by being about to be split
The mountains are about to break down to pieces. (Ghali, 2008: 311)
Ibn abbas says,' the earth and the sky are so frightened and terrified of man's atheism that they are about to
annihilate./ disappear/break down in anger. This is an indication that their anger has reached an extreme
point.
What asserts the scalar nature of Arabic exclamatives is likening them to comparative adjectives.
Contarino (1974: 11), as noted by Ryding (ibid), describes the word following maa as 'elative in the
accusative of exclamation, that is, as a comparative adjective'.