experience and lessons learned in … and lessons learned in addressing the challenges of training...
TRANSCRIPT
EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS LEARNED IN
ADDRESSING THE CHALLENGES OF
TRAINING IN KENYA
Presented
By
Mr. Lenard Menya Ong’onge
Chief Manager, Finance and Strategy
Kenya Nuclear Electricity Board (KNEB)
To
TECHNICAL MEETING(TM) ON COOPERATION FOR HUMAN
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AMONG EMBARKING AND EXPERIENCED
COUNTRIES
VENUE: VIENNA, AUSTRIA
DATE : 4th - 6th June 2013
KENYA FACTS
Africa comprises 54 countries as shown below and Kenya is a
sovereign state in East Africa
KENYA FACTS
• Kenya lies on the equator with the Indian Ocean to the south-east,
Tanzania to the south, Uganda to the west, South Sudan to the north-
west, Ethiopia to the north and Somalia to the north-east. The capital
is Nairobi.
• Kenya covers 581,309 km2 and has a population of about 43.5
million in early 2013.
• Kenya is administratively divided into 47 semi-autonomous counties
headed by Governors who were elected in the first general election
under the new Constitution in March 2013. The counties form the
first-order divisions of the country.
MAP OF KENYA SHOWING THE 47
COUNTIES
.
Ministry of Energy (MoE)
(energy policy matters)
Generation function Transmission and
Distribution
function -
KENYA POWER UETCL Imports
(<1%)
* - KenGen manages the Emergency Power Project (EPP) on behalf of the GoK ** - More Independent Power Producers (IPPs) expected in thermal, wind , solar and geothermal *** - GDC & KETRACO is 100% owned by GoK **** - REA was established to accelerate rural electrification and works with KPLC in implementing the rural programme
IPPs **
(~20% Inst. Cap)
Thermal
(187MW)
Geothermal
(~50 MW)
EPP *
(140 MW)
KenGen* (~ 80% Inst. Cap.)
Hydro
(761 MW)
Thermal
(259 MW) Wind
(5.3 MW)
Geothermal
(150 MW)
70% GoK & 30% Public
Energy Regulatory
Commission(ERC) (regulating energy sector)
Other IPPs
expected
Rural Electrification Authority (REA)****
POWER SUB-SECTOR INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
GDC KNEB KETRACO
100% Govt owned
KENYA DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY -
KENYA VISION 2030
• The country’s development agenda is anchored on the Kenya Vision
2030, which aims at creating “a globally competitive and prosperous
country with a high quality of life by 2030”.
• It aims to transform Kenya into “a newly industrialized, middle-income
country providing a high quality of life to all its citizens in a clean and
secure environment”.
• The Vision is anchored on three key pillars: economic, social and
political. Energy is a key foundation and one of the infrastructural
“enablers” upon which the economic, social and political pillars of this
long-term development strategy will be built.
IMPORTANCE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY IN
KENYA’S ENERGY MIX
• The critical need for nuclear energy is premised on the fact that, with the rising
demand for power in the country due to the accelerated investment in the economy, it
is one of the forms of energy that can produce enormous amounts of electricity at a
relatively economical cost. Kenya’s energy demand has been on a consistent rise in
recent years and it has become imperative to diversify the country’s energy sources to
meet this demand.
• Proposed projects under Kenya Vision 2030 are an ICT park, container terminal
,2nos.Standard gauge railway (Juba – Lamu and Mombasa – Nairobi –
Malaba,Kisumu), 2 nos. port including resort cities(Isiolo, Kilifi and Ukunda), Special
economic zones,I ron and steel smelting industry in Meru area and a Light rail for
Nairobi and suburbs
IMPORTANCE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY IN
KENYA’S ENERGY MIX
• The Ministry of Energy has proposed the use of nuclear energy for purposes of
electricity generation in the Draft National Energy Policy. The Least Cost Power
Development Plan (‘LCPDP’) has also recognized the need for inclusion of nuclear
energy in Kenya’s energy mix. The Least Cost Power Development Plan (LCPDP)
forecasts that the country’s peak electricity demand shall stand at over 16,905MW by
2031 requiring an installed capacity of 21,620MW electricity for industrial,
commercial and household use.
• According to the LCPDP the first nuclear power plant of 1,000 MW is expected to
be commissioned in the year 2022.
IMPORTANCE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
IN KENYA’S ENERGY MIX
Power Supply Mix for Kenya's System in 2031 as per
LCPDP - MW
5 040
2 400
2 340 1 440
1 500
4 000
2 000
140
GEOT
COAL
GAS TURBINE
MEDIUM SPEED DIESEL
WIND
NUCL
IMPORT
HYDRO
Peak Power Demand Projection for Kenya (MW)
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 0002
01
0
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
20
30
20
31
Source: Least Cost Power Development Plan 2011/2031
1st Nuclear Power plant ~
1000MW
Peak: 16,905MW Installed Capacity: 21,620MW
KENYA NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME
• The Nuclear Electricity Project committee (NEPC) was established vide
The Kenya Gazette Vol. CXII-No.123, Gazette Notice No. 14188 on the
19th November 2010 and mandate to drive the nuclear energy roadmap for
Kenya. NEPC is tasked with spearheading and fast tracking development of
nuclear electricity in order to enhance the production of affordable and
reliable electricity generation process.
• NEPC was transformed into the Kenya Nuclear Electricity Board
(KNEB) in November 2012. KNEB was established as a statutory body
through Legal Notice No. 131 issued under the State Corporations Act,
Cap 446 of the Laws of Kenya.
OBJECTIVES OF THE PROPOSED CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAMME
• To develop an adequate amount of qualified personnel necessary for the
nuclear power programme.
• To ensure manpower availability at the proper time.
• To ensure sufficient time for proper training.
• To ensure that the programme promotes the improvement of the overall
national educational, technological and industrial infrastructures.
• To make effective and efficient use of all available national training
opportunities.
• To ensure manpower retention.
KEY CAPACITY BUILDING
ACTIVITIES/UNDERTAKINGS FOR KENYA’S
NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME
i. Review of existing nuclear disciplines in the universities
ii. Introduction of appropriate nuclear disciplines in universities
iii. Introduction of nuclear energy related courses in the education syllabus at
all levels: Basic, teacher education, special needs education, post-school,
technical, business education, Non Formal Education (NFE) and Adult and
Continuing Education (ACE). To socialize learners and create interest in
the nuclear field. For this to be effective, support systems must be in place
including; curriculum, teachers and supporting materials, including
equipment.
KEY CAPACITY BUILDING
ACTIVITIES/UNDERTAKINGS FOR KENYA’S
NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME
v. Pursue capacity building with international partners under the bilateral and
multilateral relationships with governments, regulatory agencies, vendors,
utilities, educational institutions and others, which allow for placements and
staff ‘swapping’. Some proposed international institutions to partner with
include KINGS(Korea), Texas A & M University (US), International School
of Nuclear Law (ISNL in France) etc
vi. Continue participating in IAEA organized programmes under all relevant
disciplines
vii. Seek more funding allocation to support capacity building requirement for
the nuclear power programme.
KEY CAPACITY BUILDING
ACTIVITIES/UNDERTAKINGS FOR KENYA’S
NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME
viii. Continue the post graduate formal training in core nuclear related
subjects and also initiate the undergraduate education in nuclear
energy, both locally and internationally.
ix. Establishment of nuclear research institute(s)
x. Procurement of a nuclear research/training reactor
KNEB CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES
1) Scholarships - Graduate Training
The Kenyan Government through the Kenya Nuclear Electricity Board (KNEB)
launched a training programme targeting young Kenyans to be trained in various
areas of study related to nuclear science and engineering. The Government has
sponsored 30 Kenyans (2011 & 2013) to study MSc in Nuclear Science at the
Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Nairobi. The Government
under a partnership agreement with the Government of South Korea has also
sponsored 11 Kenyans to study Nuclear Engineering at graduate level at the KEPCO
International Nuclear Graduate School (KINGS), South Korea.
CURRENT CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES
2) IAEA Fellowships and Study Visits
IAEA International Cooperation Project KEN2005
The IAEA Technical Cooperation Project (TCP) titled ‘Building Capacity for
the Implementation of a Nuclear Power Programme by Developing Human
Resources, Institutional Capacity and the Legal and Regulatory Framework is
currently running. Under this project 29 staff and stakeholders were trained
through fellowship for the year 2012/2013 at Texas A & M University. The 2nd
group of 20 has already travelled to USA for a similar one month training
commencing on 4th June 2013 at TAMU. KNEB is also involved in development
of a new IAEA TC Project for 2014-2016
KNEB has also organized study visits to various nuclear active countries
including France, Korea, USA, China, South Africa, Japan among others
CURRENT CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES
3) Local & International Training
Various local and international trainings covering varied aspects of nuclear electricity
including safety, security and safeguard of NPP, nuclear law, legislative assistance and
drafting, regulation of nuclear electricity industry amongst others have already taken
place. A number of trainings (both local & international) have been attended by the
members of the NEP Committee and staff.
4) Development of Collaborative Programmes
KNEB seeks to enter into collaborative programmes with various countries, international
and national organizations, academic institutions and other relevant institutions within
and outside Kenya on nuclear electricity programme. Currently KNEB is drawing and
executing MoUs and Agreements with various nuclear electricity affiliates and interest
groups both locally and internationally.
PARTICIPANTS OF THE FELLOWSHIP
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY(TAMU)-USA
A team of 29 public sector officials embarked on a one (1) month training through an
IAEA fellowship between 9th July and 7th August 2012 at the Texas A & M
University, United States of America. The training was part of a broader capacity
building process established under the IAEA Technical Cooperation Project,
KEN2005, titled “Building Capacity for the Implementation of a Nuclear Power
Programme by Developing Human Resources, Institutional Capacity and the Legal
and Regulatory Framework”.
Participants were drawn from a wide spectrum of relevant institutions that are
expected to play crucial roles in Kenya’s nuclear power programme.
Participants disciplines included Engineering, Sciences, Communication, Human
Resource, Finance, Economics and Legal
OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAINING AT
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY(TAMU)-USA
The training objectives were set out from the start and it was expected that at
the end of the workshop, the participants would be able to:
Understand basic nuclear power plant systems, operations and safety culture
Describe the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Appreciate the prime importance of radiation protection, radioactive waste
management and environmental issues, safeguards, security and non-
proliferation
Articulate broader policy subjects such as regulatory and human resource
development, stakeholder involvement and public communications
Understand procurement procedures and financing issues in the nuclear industry
THE CAPACITY BUILDING FELLOWSHIP AT –
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY(TAMU)-USA
Major topics included introduction to nuclear physics, thermal hydraulics,
nuclear economics, fuel cycle, radiation protection at a nuclear power plant,
nuclear power plants organization, nuclear safety culture, nuclear security,
nuclear fuels and materials, nuclear kinetics, Economics of large verses Small
modular reactors (SMRs), electrical grid, non-proliferation, and nuclear
regulation. Other areas included disaster risk management, spent fuel
management and decommissioning of nuclear plants among others. The training
was conducted using a wide variety of methods including plenary presentation
by lecturers, material hand-outs, group work, field visits, simulations, and
laboratory work
KEY LESSONS FROM THE
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY(TAMU)-USA
i. Review of the capacity proposed of 1000MW in consideration of grid, SMR’s
could be an option.
ii. capacity expansion of the current skills including establishment of a
specialized energy institute
iii. Universities disciplines in Kenya need to adjusted to provide nuclear
conversion courses for engineers.
iv. Stakeholder involvement needs to key at this formative stage
v. Initiation of sustainability programs (outreach, apprenticeship, school-based
programmes etc
KEY LESSONS FROM THE
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY(TAMU)-USA
vi. Review of the financing options as the country considers nuclear. (SPV) may
need to be created for this purpose
vii. Clear emphasis on safety and security as well as international obligations
particularly THOSE RELATING TO NON-PROLIFERATION
viii. Need to undertake a capacity audit in the country and sound out all expertise
in the diaspora as Kenya considers nuclear power capacity building and
mobilization
ix. Need to collaborate with experienced institutions and countries to acquire
relevant facilities including a research reactor or training reactor.
LESSONS ON CAPACITY BUILDING FROM
THE FELLOWSHIP AT TAMU-USA
• Nuclear Industry is knowledge intensive; hence as a country, Kenya needs to
focus on training people on all facets of nuclear power generation and
implementation soonest. The training of nuclear power personnel should be
relevant and should aim at creating double competencies for redundancy and
also have refresher courses to guarantee competency of the staff and training on
human resource development, research and development.
• Need for a long term relationship with TAMU and other training institutions to
train people in various competencies (both short and long training programs),
relevant for the support of Kenya’s nuclear power programme.
LESSONS ON CAPACITY BUILDING FROM
THE FELLOWSHIP AT TAMU-USA
• Establishment of local nuclear training and research institutes is critical to
ensure training of critical mass in all relevant disciplines. The standards
in these institutions must be comparable to the best in the world.
• Set up programmes targeting young people to enhance interest in
sciences, and more so nuclear.
• The public must be engaged in the nuclear programme, for accurate
information sharing and public ownership. Special emphasis on
communities within the sites proposed and those chosen.
STRATEGIES FOR CAPACITY BUILDING
• Establishing bilateral and multilateral relationships with governments, regulatory
agencies, vendors, utilities, educational institutions and others, which allow for
placements and staff ‘swapping’
• IAEA training courses, fellowships and internships
• Formal courses of overseas study (e.g. vocational, undergraduate and postgraduate
programmes, which may include industry assignments) and training (directly with
utilities/national nuclear training organizations);
• Building staff training and development assignments into potential contracts with
vendors, consultants, service providers, etc.;
• Developing ‘strategic alliances’ with vendors/equipment suppliers whereby national
organizations obtain licenses to manufacture components in-country, which can
include training and qualification in the country of origin
FUNDING PROPOSALS FOR THE CAPACITY
BUILDING ACTIVITIES
Government of Kenya through the KNEB
Bilateral and Multilateral partnerships
Stakeholder institutions funding participants
IAEA -through fellowships, courses, expert missions, workshops etc
TCP Project
- Peaceful Uses Initiative
MAJOR CHALLENGES IN HUMAN RESOURCE
DEVELOPMENT
a) Lack of Experience in Nuclear Human Resource Development
• Kenya is approaching the development of its first commercial scale nuclear
power project from a point of zero experience in terms of training and
development of staff for the nuclear industry. Although Kenya has universities
with a history of training scientists and an institute dedicated to nuclear
sciences, the idea of developing capacity and skills to implement a
commercial scale nuclear power project will present a challenge that has never
been experienced before .
MAJOR CHALLENGES IN HUMAN RESOURCE
DEVELOPMENT
b. Lack of institutional capacity
Kenya lacks a strong institutions such as a competent nuclear regulator to support
the training of nuclear specialists. Such institutions need to be established, staffed
and provided with the necessary financial resources to acquire equipment,
facilities and other resources necessary to enable them to function.
c. Financial and Other Key Resources
The human resource development programme will require significant sums of
money to ensure its success. Financial resources will be required to establish and
staff a wide array of institutions and programs in a very short time, and to attract
a large cadre of expatriates’ expertise to occupy senior positions in a number of
key institutions.
Thank You
Questions ?