experience with ghs implementation in new zealand ghs stocktaking workshop for southeast, east, and...

28
EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter Dawson Principal Scientist, Hazardous Substances Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA New Zealand)

Upload: lisa-stevenson

Post on 22-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND

GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia

Beijing15 – 17 September 2010

Dr Peter Dawson

Principal Scientist, Hazardous Substances

Environmental Risk Management Authority

(ERMA New Zealand)

Page 2: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

OUTLINE

HSNO Act and Regulations

Implementation of the UN GHS

Revision of GHS implementing regulations

Issues with implementation

Solutions?

Page 3: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

HSNO Act 1996

Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act

New Organisms1998

New hazardous substances July 2001

Existing hazardous substances July 2001 – July 2006

All hazardous substances in all sectors (except transport) regulated in NZ by HSNO Act

(Transport regulations based on UNRTDG, IMDG, ICAO)

Page 4: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

HSNO Act 1996

PurposeTo protect the environment and the health & safety of people & communities by preventing or managing the adverse effects of

hazardous substances & new organisms

‘Cradle to Grave’ approach

setting controls on how substances are classified,

contained, labeled, stored, used, transported

or disposed of

Combined Environmental and OHS Legislation

Page 5: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Link of HSNO Purpose to SAICM

Link to UN SAICM (Strategic Approach to International Chemical Management)

- “..to achieve, by 2020, that chemicals are produced and used in ways that lead to the minimisation of significant adverse effects on human health and the environment.”

Page 6: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

The HSNO System

HSNO Act

Threshold Regulations

Classification Regulations

Controls Regulations

Property controls Regulations s140Life cycle controls

Is it hazardous?

How hazardous is it?

What do I need to do to manage the

risk?

Page 7: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Is it hazardous?

• A substance is hazardous under the HSNO Act if it exceeds the regulatory threshold for one or more of the following (GHS) properties:

Explosiveness

Flammability

Ability to oxidise

Corrosiveness (metallic and biological)

Toxicity (including chronic toxicity)

Ecotoxicity

Page 8: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Is it hazardous?

• The thresholds are based on the UN GHS (Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals)

• Set out in the threshold regulations -Hazardous Substances (Minimum Degrees of Hazard) Regulations 2001

• http://www.legislation.govt.nz

Page 9: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

How hazardous is it?

• Hazardous Substances (Classification) Regulations 2001

• http://www.legislation.govt.nz

• Sets out classes and subclasses for each hazardous property based on GHS criteria

• Currently follows draft GHS criteria from 1999

• All GHS classification categories adopted

• Revision process to align with GHS 2009 underway

Page 10: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Hazard Classification under HSNO

Classification framework has some additions to GHS• Ecotoxicity (class 9) includes soil, terrestrial

vertebrate and invertebrate ecotoxicity - based largely on US EPA criteria

Guidance on classification – data requirements, mixture rules, etc, given in ERMA User Guide to HSNO Thresholds and Classifications

http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/ER-UG-03-1.pdf

Page 11: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Features of NZ Classification Regulations

Creates a classification coding system based on UNRTDG numbering:

• Hazardous property - Class eg. Class 6 - toxicity• Subclass number eg. 6.1 – acute toxicity• Hazard category eg. A – LD50 5mg/kgCombination of the class, subclass and category constitutes a

hazard classification eg. 6.1A (very acutely toxic) = GHS acute toxicity Category 1

Correlation between HSNO and GHS hazard categories provided at:

http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/GHS%20and%20NZ%20HSNO%20HAZARD%20CLASSES%20AND%20CATEGORIES.pdf

Revision exercise will clarify how HSNO codes equate to GHS categories

Page 12: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Physical Hazard ClassificationsProperty Explosiveness Flammability Capacity to oxidise

Class Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5

Subclass 1.1 Mass

explosion

1.2 Projection

1.3 Fire & minor blast

1.4 No

significant hazard

1.5 Very

insensitive

1.6 Extremely insensitive

2.1.1 Gases

2.1.2 Aerosols

3.1 Liquids

3.2 Liquid

Desensitised explosive

4.1.1 Readily

combustible

4.1.2 Self

reactive

4.1.3 Desensitised

explosive

4.2 Spontaneously

combustible

4.3 Dangerous

when wet

5.1.1 Liquids /solids

5.1.2 Gases

5.2 Organic peroxide

Hazard

Classification 1.1A 2.1.1A 2.1.2A 3.1A 3.2A 4.1.1A 4.1.2A 4.1.3A 4.2A 4.3A 5.1.1A 5.1.2A 5.2A

1.1B 1.2B 1.4B 2.1.1B 3.1B 3.2B 4.1.1B 4.1.2B 4.1.3B 4.2B 4.3B 5.1.1B 5.2B

1.1C 1.2C 1.3C 1.4C 3.1C 3.2C 4.1.2C 4.1.3C 4.2C 4.3C 5.1.1C 5.2C

1.1D 1.2D 1.4D 1.5D 3.1D 4.1.2D 5.2D

1.1E 1.2E 1.4E 4.1.2E 5.2E

1.1F 1.2F 1.3F 1.4F 4.1.2F 5.2F

1.1G 1.2G 1.3G 1.4G 4.1.2G 5.2G

1.2H 1.3H

1.1J 1.2J 1.3J

1.2K 1.3K

1.1L 1.2L 1.3L

1.6N

1.4S

Page 13: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Biological Hazard ClassificationsProperty Toxicity Corrosiveness Ecotoxicity

Class Class 6 Class 8 Class 9 Sub-Class 6.1

Acutely toxic

6.3 Skin

irritant

6.4 Eye

irritant

6.5 Sensitisation

6.6 Mutagen

6.7 Carcinogen

6.8 Reproductive / developmental

6.9 Target organ

systemic

8 1 Metallic

corrosive

8.2 Skin

corrosive

8.3 Eye

corrosive

9.1 Aquatic

9.2 Soil

9.3 Terrestrial Vertebrate

9.4 Terrestrial

Invertebrate

Hazard Classification 6.1 A

6.3A 6.4A 6.5 A

6.6 A

6.7 A

6.8 A

6.9 A

8.1A 8.2 A

8.3 A

9.1 A

9.2 A

9.3 A

9.4 A

6.1 B

6.3B 6.5 B

6.6 B

6.7 B

6.8 B

6.9 B

8.2 B

9.1 B

9.2 B

9.3 B

9.4 B

6.1 C

6.8 C

8.2 C

9.1 C

9.2 C

9.3 C

9.4 C

6.1 D

9.1 D

9.2 D

6.1E

Page 14: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Classification of Chemicals

Hazard classification data for 5400 chemicals can be found on the ERMA New Zealand Chemicals Classification Information Database (CCID)http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/hs/compliance/chemicals.html

Available on the OECD’s eChemPortalhttp://webnet3.oecd.org/echemportal/Home.aspx

Page 15: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter
Page 16: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter
Page 17: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter
Page 18: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter
Page 19: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Published classifications

Dangerous Goods and Scheduled Toxic Substances Transfer Notice 2004

http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/consolidatedGN35and128.pdf

~ 660 chemicals Chemicals Transfer Notice 2006

http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/gn72june06.pdf

~ 5000 chemicals (~500 pesticide, vet met actives)

Page 20: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Classifications & controls

Classifications are ‘tools’ linking a substance and its hazardous properties to the appropriate level of controls

Controls are performance based• Say what must be achieved, not how to achieve it• Provide flexibility in ‘how’ to meet requirement

For hazard communication• GHS label elements can be used but are not mandatory• GHS safety data sheet criteria can be used but not mandatory• Not in accord with ‘building block’ approach but need to accept

overseas labelled products from non-GHS countries• May revise as GHS implementation overseas progresses

Page 21: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Capacity Building Initiatives

Workshops/training programmes for enforcement officers and advisors

Seminars/workshops for industry, including in Australia

Guidance documents, codes of practice developed by ERMA and industry

NZCIC (Responsible Care) developed electronic compliance tool

Industry associations/regulatory agencies fully engaged, SMEs/workforce level less so

Need for capacity building at worker/public level

Page 22: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

22

Revision of Threshold and Classification Regs

Issued in May 2001

Based on proposals for GHS in 1999 and UNRTDG 11th Ed., 1999

Never amended since

GHS published in 2003, 1st Rev. 2005, 2nd Rev. 2007, 3rd Rev. July 2009

UNRTDG 16th Ed. 2009

Page 23: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

23

Revision of Threshold and Classification Regs

Update to reflect ‘current’ (2009) form of GHS in a manner consistent with adoption by overseas jurisdictions:

• European Union

• Australia

• China

• USA

Page 24: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Issues with implementation

Classification Classification of mixtures when no mixture test data

and lack of data available on components Lack of data available consistent with GHS endpoints

• NZ reliant on overseas data generated to existing criteria such as EU R-phrases

• Difficult to determine if hazard threshold crossed for some chronic toxicity endpoints because of absence of data

Evaluation of data quality/applicability• Variation in data available for a chemical• ‘Expert judgment’, ‘weight of evidence’ – consistent application

between countries/jurisdictions? Shortage of ‘experts’ No harmonised international list of GHS classified

substances

Page 25: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Issues with implementation

Hazard communication Dual system GHS/non-GHS labelling accepted

• Recognises NZ implementation of GHS is “ahead of other countries”

• Removes the need for relabelling

• Minimises compliance costs

Hazard based labelling versus risk based labelling – particularly for labelling of consumer products and pesticides

Page 26: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

Issues with implementation

Solutions? Guidance on classification – particularly mixtures (in

preparation)• Sector specific guidance eg. IPIECA for petroleum products

Guidance on criteria for evaluating data quality/applicability

Development of repository of GHS compatible data – OECD Global Portal?

Global database of GHS classified substances?OECD survey of Rotterdam chemicals, SCEGHS survey of

approach to lists, China/Japan/South Korea cooperation Guidance in application of building block approach to

different sectors Guidance on hazard vs risk based labelling

• APEC project on application of GHS to consumer products

Page 27: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter

ERMA New Zealand

Contact details

www.ermanz.govt.nz

[email protected]

Page 28: EXPERIENCE WITH GHS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND GHS Stocktaking Workshop for Southeast, East, and Central Asia Beijing 15 – 17 September 2010 Dr Peter