experiences on aton's gained in the newada duo project
TRANSCRIPT
Experiences on AtoN’sgained in the NEWADA
DUO projectDamir Obad
25.11.2014.
1expert group tracking and tracing
AGENDA:
1. NEWADA Duo Introduction
2. ATON Challenges
3. Results of the Pilot Implementation
4. Recommendations
2expert group tracking and tracing
NEWADA DUO:
• Project duration: Oct 2012 - Sept 2014
• Project partners: 9 from 7 countries
• Total project budget € 2,2 Mio.
• Objectives: Improve waterway management – Facilitate ICT based services (FIS portal, bahimetric
ENCs, AtoN)
expert group tracking and tracing3
• WP 5 – USER SERVICES BASED ON ICT
–Activity 5.3 – Pilot for Aids to Navigation (AtoNs)
• Planning of pilot AtoNs networks on selected stretches
• Design (including technical specification & ToR (Terms of Reference)) of pilot AtoNsmonitoring solutions for selected stretches
• Implementation of pilot system for virtual AtoNs provision on selected stretches
expert group tracking and tracing5
• Tests and evaluation of the results achieved on the pilot stretches for the implemented pilot system
• Design (including ToR) of pilot system for virtual AtoNs provision on selected stretches
• Implementation of pilot system for virtual AtoNs provision on selected stretches
• Tests and evaluation of the results achieved on the pilot stretches for the implemented pilot system
• Report on conclusions and recommendations based on tests and evaluations conducted within pilots
expert group tracking and tracing6
AGENDA:
1. NEWADA Duo Introduction
2. ATON Challenges
3. Results of the Pilot Implementation
4. Recommendations
7expert group tracking and tracing
ATON CHALLENGES:
• No clear indication on the buoy type (left, right, crossroads…)
• Some skippers can see the AtoNs, some cannot
• Conflicts with the ECDIS chart (many issues)
• May confuse skippers not being aware why it has been published
expert group tracking and tracing8
• Higher implementation and maintenance costs for real ATONs
• Additional load on the AIS base network
• MMSI assignments
expert group tracking and tracing9
AGENDA:
1. NEWADA Duo Introduction
2. ATON Challenges
3. Results of the Pilot Implementation
4. Recommendations
10expert group tracking and tracing
• Problems we faced:
–Budget cuts (40% less budget, same requirements)
–WP 5.3. Lead partner dropped out of the task
• Delay in specifications and procurement
–Limited or no access to national infrastructure
expert group tracking and tracing11
• Results
–Pilot systems implemented in Romania and Croatia
–Virtual AtoN management system
–Type 1 physical AtoN
–Type 3 physical AtoN (Romania only)
–Two different approaches to management applications
• Full featured ECDIS viewer in Romania
• Dedicated AtoN app in Croatia
expert group tracking and tracing12
• Problems with the solar panels, poor charging capacity
• Fully charged battery of 8Ah lasts about 20 days
• No equipment damaged or stolen during 2-3 months of operation
• Transmission without slot allocation
• Every 6 min on each channel (effectively 3 min)
expert group tracking and tracing14
• No special codes for display on ECDIS
• dGPS signal transmitted through the base station network
• Virtual AtoNs transmitted through the base station network
–High reliability of transmitted AtoNs
–No name coding so far
expert group tracking and tracing15
• Romanian pilot:
• Pilot activities are covering following segments:
–Waterborne segment (type 1 and 3)
–Onboard segment
–Onshore segment
–9 buoys equipped
–9 operational
– No stolen, damaged, or nonfunctional devices
expert group tracking and tracing18
• Reception on board
–AIS AtoNs (both real and virtual) have been received well
–Configuration parameters were correctly detected by onboard AIS device
–Range of reception was acceptable (up to 10km)
–Stability of reception onboard was proven to be good
expert group tracking and tracing20
AGENDA:
1. NEWADA Duo Introduction
2. ATON Challenges
3. Results of the Pilot Implementation
4. Recommendations
25expert group tracking and tracing
• Real AtoNs
–Battery power 8-24 Ah
–Recommended solar panels 4X5-6W (or different positioning of 2 panels)
–Sometimes problems with reception by shore infrastructure possibly due to low gain antennas and low position
–Precise GPS position
–Excellent for monitoring critical buoys
expert group tracking and tracing26
• Virtual AtoNs
–100% reliability during test period
– Inexpensive (free) and very fast way to mark critical events on the waterway
–Proper display (location) on both information and navigation ECDIS mode
–Problems with MMSI assignment
–Requires high redundancy shore system
–Possible link with NtS
expert group tracking and tracing27
• General
–Display standardization is a must! Two ways to achieve it:
• Name coding (easier and faster)
• Reassignment of codes within the AIS standard
–Changes in the ECDIS standard are required
–ECDIS on board highly recommended (obligatory)
expert group tracking and tracing28
AtoNs are very promising technology that has a future on inland waterways, but requires
imidiate action towards standardization!
expert group tracking and tracing29
Thank you for your kind attention!
Damir Obad, RGO [email protected]
With special thanks to:
AVP, AFDJ and Bogdan Paduraru
expert group tracking and tracing30